I I?'"? DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa ----~

Transcription

1 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTO NUMBER ~ FY 215 STATE OF ARIZONA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL EXPENDITURE BUDGET DISTRICTWIDE BUDGET Proposed Version BY THE GOVERNING BOARD We hereby certify that the Budget for the Fiscal Year 215 was Proposed June 3, 214 Adopted Revised Date Mrs. Bonnie Sneed, President Mr. Denny Brown, Vice President Mr. George Jackson, Member Mrs. Pam Kirby, Member REVENUES AND PROPERTY TAXATION (This section is not applicable to budget revisions) I. Total Budgeted Revenues for Fiscal Year 214 2,226, 2. Estimated Revenues by Source for Fiscal Year 215 (excluding property taxes) Local 1 17, 167, Intermediate 2 State 3 19,299, Federal 4 9,42,6 TOTAL 45,886,6 3. District Tax Rates for Prior and Budget Fi scal Years (A.R.S. ~ D.4) Prior FY 2 14 Primary Tax Rate: r- 3~3548 J Secondary Tax Rates: M&O Override Special K-3 Program Override Special Program Override Capital Override Class A Bonds Class B Bonds JTED Total Secondary Tax Rate Est. Budget FY 2 15 I Mrs. Barbara Perleberg, Member A. TOTAL AGGREGATE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET LIMIT (A.R.S H) I. General Budget Limit (from Budget, page 7, line 1) 143,81,95 SIGNED SIGNED 2. Unrestricted Capital Budget Limit (from Budget, page 8, line A.12) 3. Subtotal (line A.l + A.2 ) s 17,97,475 16, 178,57 J:: The budget file(s) for FY 215 sent to the Arizona Department of Education, via the internet, on 214 ""'""(')<he d"' fm ''" bodg" d"cnbcd bow 1 ~ -~ ==--- I?'"? Superintendent Signature Business Manager Signature 4. Federal Projects (from Budget, page 6, line 18) 5. Title VIII-Impact Aid (from Budget, page 6, Federal Projects, line 16) 6. Total Aggregate School District Budget Limit (line A.3 + A.4- A.5) B. BUDGETED EXPENDITURES I. Maintenance and Operation (from Budget, page I, line 3) 2. Unrestricted Capital Outlay (fi om Budget, page 4, line I ) " 9, 13, ,38, ,81,95 17,97, Total Budget Subject to Budget Limits (line B.2) (This line cannot exceed line A.3.) 16, 178,57 Di stri ct Contact Employee: Daniel O'Brien Telephone: DOBricn(c/Jsusd.org Rev. 5/14-FY 215

2 ~ DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 FUND 1 (M&O) Expenditures Pnor FY 1 tuu Kegutar nducatton 1 Instruction l Support Services 21 Students Instructional Staff 3. KO.IU 23 General Administration 4. o.oo 24 School Administration 5. UU.4/ 25 Central Services Operation & Maintenance of Plant 7. LJ).4) 29 Other Operation ofnoninstructional Services 9. '/. 61 School-Sponsored Cocwricular Activities 1. u.uu 62 School-Sponsored Athletics K9 63, 7, 8, 9 Other Programs 12. u.uu Regular Education Subsection Subtotal (lines l-i2) 13. 1,44().)() 12UU~pecialnducahon I Instruction Support Services 21 Students Instructional Staff 16. ILL) 23 General Administration I School Administration I8. u.uu 25 Central Services 19. o.uu 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 2. u.uu 29 Other 21. u.uu 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 22.. Subtotal (lines 14-22) 23. )21.1So 4!'upi1J.raJisportahon 24. IK2.5 :> JU uesegregatwnttrom UistnctWJde Uesegregatton Budget, page 2, line 44) 25. Il3.24 )2U ~pecial K.-3 l"rogram Uvemde (from Supplement, page I, line IO) )3Uropout!'revenhonPrograms q )4U Jornt career and Technical nducanon and Vocahonal Education Center (from Supplement, page I, line 2) K-3 Readrng Program 29. ll.kk Iota! nxpenditures ttrnes u, and LJ-2~) (Cannot exceed page 7, line 1) 3. _:~, FfE Budget FY IU 5. UU.)J LJL/U 7. u.uu 5.K9 1,3~!.IS~ IU.L:> ) lu.~u 1K l.KK 2, COUNTY Maricopa CTDNUMBER 7248 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (M&O) FUND Employee!'urchased Salaries Benefits Services Supplies Other 63, 64, 6IOO ,418,I22 11,935,473 1,832, ,337 4,48 2,998,62 I,,346 83,569 3,834 2,125 L, ~~~, )(JIS ~n,t:>u JL/,)ISJ 24,UU/ 11,ouu 5KO,Ll4 24,K19 l9k,444 11,43 J,537 o, /4L,J~3 2,12/,~4 14o,UU2 IU4,UIS 2,166,341! 919,1SJ) 1,331,)3~ I U,LD 1/,I(J/ o,y/2, JU) 2,JD,5J1 7,192,397 4,912,557 16, 154,KOO 61,714 56,442 IL,~IS~ 2JL,ISUU 4o,4~u l,76,~1s I L4L,(JIIS 23/,)ISIS 4LU ou,~4j,~:>~ I~, ISJ~,~lo 11,4Uo,91/ o,uju,54u 114,1S::rt 16,314,743 5,215,433 I97, ,173, , ,962 41S3,o2L 141,~/~ )UU /,JUU 2,UUU IIS,~:I12,21SIS ),94'/,21Sl 4()'/,61 IS,OOO 4,())3,/U) I, /2~,4/ 3l,ISU 1,411S,tot 5,522,I24 1,46,455 44,777 I58,812 2,422, ,655 14,I63 IllS, DIS 3),4/(J ot,4~o 714,37 I75,65 93,345,432 29,882,48 12,54,73I 7,683, ,837 Pnor FY 2I4 54,764,3I7 Totals 4,I2,263 4,J /2,1S~I 1,1)),4)1 9, 195,925 :>,U43,3~U 22,133,354 u 3:>1,~/4 21S5,51S:> 1,)42,) /~ 12,941S,'/29 22,39,443 2,876,759 '/(J5,45J u 2,UUU u u 25,61!3,655 /,/2(),~1() 7,186,I69 3,254,5I LLl, UU ~u~,u ,93,145 VERSION Budget FY 2I5 51,978,693 4,88,476 4,JJ:>,~UIS ~~IS,U/1 9,IL,4n 4,ou~,JU4 21,2,59 u 34),~4) [/9,29 J,))f,(Jlj 91S,334,1o9 21,728,475 3,3, ,41 u u 2,UUU u u u 25,394,63 /,ISJ3,JJ2 7,I86,I68 3,22I,646 LLl,UU IS~U,U2U I43,81,95 Proposed % Increase/ Decrease -5.1% I. -.3% 2. -U.IS'Yo 3. -u.6% 4. -O.IS% 5. -IS.o'Yo % 7. U.U% 8. -L.U'Yo % 1. I.U'Yo II..% % 13. -I.4% % /.3% 16. U.U% 17..% 18. U.U'Yo 19. U.U'Yo 2. U.U% 21. U.U'Yo 22. -l.l% % 24..% % 26. U.U'Yo 27..% 'Yo % 3. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23AM Page I of8

3 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa _. CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS BY TYPE (M&O Fund Program 2) (A.R.S and 15-93) 1. Autism 2. Emotional Disability 3. Hearing Impairment 4. Other Health Impairments 5. Specific Learning Disability 6. Mild, Moderate or Severe Intellectual Disability 7. Multiple Disabilities 8. Multiple Disabilities with Severe Sensory Impairment 9. Orthopedic Impairment 1. Developmental Delay 11. Preschool Severe Delay 12. Speech/Language Impairment 13. Traumatic Brain Injury 14. Visual Impairment 15. Subtotal (lines 1 through 14) 16. Gifted Education 17. Remedial Education 18. ELL Incremental Costs 19. ELL Compensatory Instruction 2. Vocational and Technological Education 21. Career Education 22. Total (lines 15 through 21. Must equal total of line 23, page 1) Prior FY Budget FY ,347, ,188 73,14 1,75, ,47, ,29, , , , ,381 61, , , ,886 4,76, , ,1UlS, , ,781, , ,322 25,683,655 25,394, Expenditures BUdgeted for Audit Sei-vices CM&O Fund - Nonfederal ~. ~635 All Funds - Federal , FY 215 Performance Pay (A.R.S ) Amount Budgeted in M&O Fund for a Performance Pay Component Do not report budgeted amounts for the Performance Pay Component of the Classroom Site Fund on this line. Average Daily Membership A. FY 214 Average Daily Membership: B. FY 213 Average Daily Membership: Resident 23, Resident 24,24.26 Attending 24, Attending 24, Proposed Ratios for Special Education (A.R.S E.l and A.5) Teacher-Pupil 1 to 9 Staff-Pupil 1 to ""8, Estimated FTE Certified Employees (A.R.S E.2) Expenditures Budgeted in the M&O Fund for Food Service Amount budgeted in M&O fo; Food Service (Fund 1, Function 31) (This amount will be used to determine district compliance with state matching requirements pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 7, 21.17(a)] Estimated Transportation Revenues for FY 215 Estimated transportation revenues (object code 14) to be received 129,431 Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/21 4 9:23AM Page 2 of8

4 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION_P_ro..:.po_ sed SaJaries 61 Employee Benefits 62 l Regulae Education 1 Instruction 21 Support Services - Students 22 Support Services- Instructional Staff Program 1 Subtotal Qines 1-3) 2 Special Education 1 Instruction 21 Support Services- Students 22 Support Services - Instructional Staff Program 2 Subtotal Qines 5-7) Other Programs (Specuy) Instruction 21 Support Services- Students (I) For FY 2 15, the district has budgeted --,...--.,.---- in Fund 1, object code 659 for Classroom Site Fund pass-through payments to districtsponsored charter schools. This amount is not included in the amounts reported for Fund Support Services- Students 22 Support Services- Instructional Staff Program 1 Subtotal (lines 14-16) 2 Special Education l Instruction 21 Support Services -Students 22 Support Services -Instructional Staff Program 2 Subtotal Qines 18-2) Other Programs (Specify) Instruction 21 Support Services- Students 22 Support Services -Instructional Staff Other Programs Subtotal Qines 22-24) I DO Regular Education I Instruction 21 Supp<>rt Services - Students 22 Supp<>rt Services- Instructional Staff Program 1 Subtotal Qines 27-29) 2 Special Education '" '..._.,.., 28 16,24 4, ,946 1, ,637,1 63, ,15 1 Instruction 31 u.~n»v 21 Supp<>rt Services- Students 32 l---- ;;::,28;:;, 9:;~ :..::..,8;::, ;:7::; l 22 Support Services -Instructional Staff 33 Program 2 Subtotal Qines 31-33) ;4;:: 9:-,;-: 16::: ;-14:;-:3:-:,::;I-:; ;: ::-1 53 Dropout Prevention Programs I Instruction 3 5 Other Programs (Specify) f I Instruction 36 21,22 Support Serv. Students & Instructional Stalf f u u u u ~ -~ ".,~ -- ~, Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23 AM Page 3 of 8

5 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTDNUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed FUND61 UNRESTRICTED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND Rentals 644 All Other Totals % Increase/ 2 Support Services 21, 22 Students and Instructional Staff 3. 23, 24, 25,29 Administration I 4,VV:J,1 I 14,.)4,:1:14 26 Operation & Maintenance ofplant 5. ~ Student Transportation Operation ofnoninstructional Services (5) - 4 Facilities Acquisition and Construction 5 Debt Service Total Unrestricted (1) Amounts in the Unrestricted Capital Outlay Override line 1 above must be included in the appropriate individual line items for Fund 61 and in the Budget Year Total Column. (2) Detail by object code: 6641 Library Books 6642 Textbooks 6643 Instructional Aids 6731 Furniture and Equipment 6734 Vehicles 6737 Tech Hardware & Software Unrestricted Capital Outlay 727,142 2, 1,985,168 7,983,427 T,UOU 4,882,737 (5)" Expenditures Budgeted in Unrestricted Capital Outlay (UCO) Fund for Food Service Enter the amount budgeted in UCO for Food Service [Amount will be used to determine district compliance with state matching requirements pursuant to CFR Title 7, 21.17(a)] (6) Expenditures, if any, budgeted in the Unrestricted Capital Outlay Fund on lines 2-9 for the K-3 Reading Program as described in A.R.S (3) Includes principal on Capital Equity Fund loans of (4) Includes interest on Capital Equity Fund loans of , principal on capital leases of 2,42,79, and principal on bonds of 22,116, ' interest on capital1eases of 261,81, and interest on bonds of 12,18,285 Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/ :23AM Page 4 of8

6 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed OTHER FUNDS-REQUIRED CAPITAL EXPENDITURE DETAIL!(A.R.S (B)] UNRESTRICTED CAPITAL OUTLAY Expenditures Fund 61 PriorFY BudgetFY Total Fund Expenditures I. 14,661,47 17,97,475 S,el~ct Object Codes Detail (1) o 615 Classified Salaries Employee Benefits 3. 41,73 45, Construction Services 4. 1,24,67 1,194, Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements Fwniture and Equipment 7. 4,12,718 7,983, Vehicles 8. 2, 2, 6737 Technology Hardware & Software 9. 4,913,169 4,882, , 6832 Redemption ofprincipal 1. 4,5 6841, 6842, 685 Interest II. Total amounts reported on lines 2-11 above for: Renovation 12. 1,24,67 1,194,793 New Construction 13. Other 14. 8,974,117 12,918,213 Total (lines 12-14) 15. 1,178,724 14,113,6 BOND BUILDING Fund 63 PriorFY BudgetFY 6,213,836 91,83 28,134 6,94,525 6,213,742 6,213,742 NEW SCHOOL FACILITIES Fund 695 PriorFY BudgetFY ~~-~~~--,; ~ ~~ '. " I ~ 7 a s I I, I 2. I 3. I (I) Lines 2-11 may not include all budgeted expenditures of the fund. Total budgeted expenditures for each fund should be included on Line I. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23 AM Page 5 of8

7 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY _M_ar_ic_o._pa CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed SPECIAL PROJECTS FEDERAL PROJECTS I ESEA Title I- Helping Disadvantaged Children ESEA Title II- Prof. Dev. and Technology ESEA Title IV- 21st Century Schools ESEA Title V- Promote Informed Parent Choice ESEA Title III- Limited Eng. & Immigrant Students ESEA Title VII -Indian Education ESEA Title VI- Flexibility and Accountability IDEA Part B Johnson-O'Malley Workforce Investment Act AEA - Adult Education Vocational Education- Basic Grants ESEA Title X- Homeless Education Medicaid Reimbursement E-Rate ImpactAid Other Federal Projects (Besides E-Rate & Impact Aid) Total Federal Project Funds (lines 1-17) STATE PROJECTS Vocational Education Early Childhood Block Grant Ext. School Yr. -Pupils with Disabilities Adult Basic Education Chemical Abuse Prevention Programs Academic Contests Gifted Education Environmental Special Plate Other State Projects Total State Project Funds (lines 19-27) 29. Total Special Projects (lines 18 and 28) INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (2) 1. Teacher Compensation Increases 2. Class Size Reduction 3. Dropout Prevention Programs (M&O purposes) 4. Instructional Improvement Programs (M&O purposes) 5. Total Instructional Improvement Fund (lines 1-4) FfE Prior FY BudgetFY IOT.J7 ""8:T PriorFY 5, 1,384,114 1,884,114 TOTAL ALL FUNCTIONS PriorFY 3,594,38 531,79 56, ,966 16,248 4,567,189 2,48 37,288 77,829 11,557 11,,57 128,1 3,7 131,8 1T,T3T,3/o BudgetFY 5, 1,641,215 2,141,215 I BudgetFY 3,39,93 58, , ,79 11,95 3,338,653 18, ,452 1,156,77 46,788 9,13,349 76,76 76,76 9,27,19 l : OTHER FUNDS (DO NOT Add to Aggregate) I. 5 County, City, and Town Grants Structured English Immersion (I) Compensatory Instruction (I) 4,! 8 Student Success 5. 5 School Plant (Lease over 1 year) (2) School Plant (Lease I year or less) School Plant (Sale) Food Service Civic Center Community School Auxiliary Operations Extracurricular Activities Fees Tax Credit Gifts and Donations Career & Tech. Ed. & Voc. Ed. Projects Fingerprint School Opening Insurance Proceeds Textbooks Litigation Recovery Indirect Costs Unemployment Insurance Teacherage Insurance Refund Grants and Gifts to Teachers Advertisement Joint Technical Education Adjacent Ways Impact Aid Revenue Bond Building School Plant- Special Construction Gifts and Donations-Capital Condemnation Energy and Water Savings Emergency Deficiencies Correction Building Renewal Grant Debt Service Impact Aid Revenue Bond Debt Service 37. Other INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS l. 9_ Self-Insurance Intergovernmental Agreements _ OPEB _ 6 2,4, 2,47,154 37,558 12,958 86, 93,374 l (1) From Supplement, page 3, line 1 and line 2, respectively. (2) Indicate amount budgeted in Fund 5 for M&O purposes Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23AM Page 6 of8

8 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District COUNTY _M..;.;a.;_n...;.'c""'op"'a' CTDNUMBER ~7..:..:2~4;..::.8..:..:;..::. FY 215 Revenue Control Limit (RCL) (from Work Sheet E, line VIII, or Work Sheet F, line III) * (b) Plus Adjustment for Growth (I) * (c) Increase or (Decrease) in 3 District High School Tuition Payments (A.R.S J) (1) CALCULATION OF FY 215 GENERAL BUDGET LIMIT (A.R.S C)..:..;12:..;;,3.:..;;,,..:..;83""':..;,.9,;_9 (d) Adjusted RCL..:..:12:..;;,3.:..:.,..:..:83'-":..;,.9,;_9 2. (a) FY 215 District Additional Assistance (DAA) (from Work Sheet H, lines VII.E.l and Vli.F.l) 11,713, '--"--- *(b) DAA Reduction for State Budget Adjustments (from Work Sheet H, lines VII.E.2 and VII.F.2) 6,943,891 A. Maintenance and Operation..:..;12:..;;,3.:..:.,..:..;83"":..;,.9,;_9 VERSION ;;..Pro;..;..o;.p.;;,;os;..;.ed..;. B. Unrestricted Capital Outlay ;_ (c) Adjusted DAA.~.! FY 215 Ovenide Authorization (A.R.S and ) * (a) Maintenance and Operation ;4.:..;., 7..:..;69;..:,5;..::.=-2 * (b} Unrestricted Capital Outlay * (c) Special Program *4.. Small School Adjustment for Districts with a Student Count of 125 or less in K-8 or 1 or less in 9-12 (A.R.S ) (If phase-down applies, see Work Sheets K and K2) *5. Tuition Revenue (A.R.S and ) Local (a) Individuals and Other Private Sources (b) Other Arizona Districts (c) Out-of-State Districts and Other Governrnents State Certificates of Educational Convenience (A.R.S , , and ) State Assistance (A.R.S ) and Special Ed. Voucher Payments Received (A.R.S ) Increase Authorized by County School Superintendent for Accommodation Schools (not to exceed Work SheetS, line II.B.5) (A.R.S B) 8. Budget Increase for: (a) Desegregation Expenditures (A.R.S K) * (b) Tuition Out Debt Service (from Work Sheet, line 7)(A.R.S L) *(c) l Budget Balance Carryforward (from Work Sheet M, line 12) (A.R.S ) (d) Dropout Prevention Programs (Laws 1992, Ch. 35, 32 and Laws 2, Ch. 398, 2) (e) Registered Warrant or Tax Anticipation Note Interest Expense Incurred in FY 213 (A.R.S M) *(f) Joint Career and Technical Education and Vocational Education Center (A.R.S ),,, ;H * (g). FY 214 Career Ladder Unexpended Budget Carryforward (from Work Sheet M, line 6.f) (A.R.S C) * (Iir FY 214 Optional Performance Incentive Program Unexpended Budget Carryforward (from Work Sheet M, line 6.g) (A.R.S ) 214 Performance Pay Unexpended Budget Carryforward (from Work Sheet M, line 6.h)(A.R.S ) (j) Excessive Property Tax Valuation Judgments (A.R.S and ) * (k) Transportation Revenues for Attendance of Nonresident Pupils (A.R.S and ) ' *9,, Adjustment to the General Budget Limit (A.R.S , M, , and ) (Do not use this line as a subtotal) (2) 1. FY 215 General Budget Limit (column A, lines 1 through 9) (A.R.S F) (page 1, line 3 cannot exceed this amount) 11. Total Amount to be Used for Capital Expenditures (column B, lines 1 through 8) ( A.R.S F) (to page 8, line A.ll) 4,543,61 4,12,81 3,221, ,432 24,583 7,186,169 2,854,88 221,13 28,317 49,3 (2,413,853) ===14=3..,=81==95= 226,441 9,91, , =====:o;======= * Subject to adjustment prior to May 15 as allowed by A.R.S. Revisions are described in the instructions for these lines, as needed. (1) For budget adoption, this line should be left blank. (2) This line can be used to adjust the FY 215 GBL for any of the following: (1) reductions for (a) exceeding the prior year(s) GBL, (b) exceeding the prior year(s) M&O section of the Budget, or (2) reductions or increases due to (a) ADM Audit Adjustment, (b) Noncompliance Adjustment, (c) transfers to/from the EWS Fund, (d) JTED Reduction, or(e) other adjustments as notified by ADE. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/ :23AM Page7 of8

9 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #4~ COUNTY Maricopa CTDNUMBER ~~7~2~4~8~~- VERSION ;,;Pro=po:;.;;s,;;;ed:;... UNRESTRICTED CAPITAL BUDGET LIMIT AND CLASSROOM SITE FUND BUDGET LIMIT (A.R.S D and A.R.S ) CALCULATION OF UNRESTRICTED CAPITAL BUDGET LIMIT A. I. FY 214 Unrestricted Capital Budget Limit (UCBL) (from FY 214latest revised Budget, page 8, line A.12) 2. Total UCBL Adjustment for prior years as notified by ADE on BUDG75 report (For budget adoption, use zero.) 3. Adjusted Amount Available for FY 214 Capital Expenditures (line A. l + A.2) 4. Amount Budgeted in Fund 61 in FY 214 (from FY 214latest revised Budget, page 4, line 1) 5. Lesser of line A.3 or the sum of line A.4 and any positive adjustment on line A.2 6. FY 214 Fund 61 Actual Expenditures (For budget adoption use actual expenditures to date plus estimated expenditures through fiscal year-end.) 7. Unexpended Budget Balance in Fund 61 (line A.5 minus A.6) If negative, use zero in calculation, but show negative amount here in parentheses. 8. Interest Earned in Fund 61 in FY Monies deposited in Fund 61 from School Facilities Board for donated land (A.R.S l.F) 1. Adjustment to UCBL for FY 215 (A.R.S M) (1) II. Amount to be Used for Capital Expenditures (from page 7, line 11) 12. FY 215 Unrestricted Capital Budget Limit (lines A.7 through A.l1) (2) 14,661,47 14,661,47 14,661,47 14,661,47 7,911,36 6,75,11 23,675 1,323,789 17,97,475 CALCULATION OF CLASSROOM SITE FUND BUDGET LIMIT B. 1. FY 214 Classroom Site Fund Budget Limit (from FY 214latest revised Budget, page 8, line C.7) 2. FY 214 Classroom Site Fund Actual Expenditures (For budget adoption use actual expenditures to date plus estimated expenditures through fiscal year-end.) 3. Unexpended Budget Balance in Classroom Site Fund (line B.1 minus B.2) 4. Interest Earned in the Classroom Site Fund in FY FY 215 Classroom Site Fund Allocation (provided by ADE, based on 295) (3) 6. Adjustments to FY 215 Classroom Site Fund Budget Limit 7. FY 215 Classroom Site Fund Budget Limit (Sum oflines B.3 through B.6) (4) 9,924,221 6,789,11 8 3,135,13 4,954 8,583,617 11,723,674 (1) This line can be used to adjust the FY 215 UCBL for any of the following: (1) reductions for (a) exceeding the prior year(s) UCBL or (b) exceeding the prioryear(s) UCO section of the Budget, or (2) increases due to greater than anticipated growth from FY 214, or (3) JTED reduction, or (4) reductions or increases due to other adjustments as notified by ADE. (2) The amount budgeted on page 4, line 1 cannot exceed this amount. (3) In accordance with A.R.S ()(1), the per pupil amount is calculated based on estimated available resources in the Classroom Site Fund for the budget year and adjusted for prior year revenue carryforwards or shortfalls. However, actual payments to districts may differ from the estimated per pupil Classroom Site Fund allocation. (4) The sum of the amounts budgeted on page 3, line 4 and footnote (1) on that page, cannot exceed this amount. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23AM Page 8 of8

10 Use the table below to calculate the amounts for Page 8, section B. These calculations need not be printed as an official part of the budget forms. 1. FY 214 Classroom Site Fund Budget Limit (from FY 214latest revised Budget, page 8, line 7 of the table) 2. FY 214 Actual Expenditures (For budget adoption use actual expenditures to date plus estimated expenditures through fiscal year-end.) 3. Unexpended Budget Balance (line 1 minus 2) 4. Interest Earned in FY FY 215 Classroom Site Fund Allocation (provided by ADE, based on 295) Enter the total allocation in the Total Fund 1 colunm. Funds 11, 12, and 13 will automatically calculate. 6. Adjustments to FY 215 Classroom Site Fund Budget Limit* Payments to Fund 11 Fund 12 Fund 13 Charter Schools 1,833,984 1,833, ,716,724 4,422,278 3,667,959 1,957,354 2,997,78 2,464,924 67,179 3,618 1,1 3,433,447 3,433,447 Total Fund 1 9,924,221 6,789,118 3,135,13 4,954 8,583, FY 215 Classroom Site Fund Budget Limit (Sum of lines 3 through 6) ** 1,716,96 5,91,989 4,14,726 11,723,674 * This line may be used to recapture lost CSF budget capacity that resulted from underbudgeting in prior fiscal years. ** The amounts budgeted on page 3, lines 13, 26, 39, and footnote (1) should not exceed the amounts on this line. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23AM Page 8 of8

11 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed FY 215 STATE OF ARIZONA SUPPLEMENT TO SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL EXPENDITURE BUDGET FOR DISTRICTS THAT BUDGET FOR: SPECIAL K-3 PROGRAM OVERRIDE (A.R.S D and Laws 21, Ch. 179, 4) JOINT CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER(A.R.S ) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (A.R.S and ) Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:23 AM

12 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 M&O Fund Supplement Expenditures 52 Special K-3 Program Override I Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 29 Other 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services Subtotal (lines 1-9) (to Budget, page I, line 26) 54 Joint Caree~!,l~~.!~chnt~~Educ ation & Vocation~!..!~~~!!?!! Center I Instruction 2 Sup port Services 21 Students Instructional Staff General Administration School Administration Central Services Operation & Maintenance of Plant Other Operation ofnoninstructional Services Subtotal (lines 11-19) (to Budget, page I, line 28) I II Prior FY FTE Budget FY COUNTY Maricopa Salaries 61 2,422,828 2,422,828 Employee Benefits , ,655 Purchased Services 63,64, 65 14,163 14,163 CTDNUMBER Supplies 66 7? Other 68 Prior FY 214 3,254,51 Totals 3,254,51 VERSION Budget FY 215 3,221,646 3,221,646 Proposed % Increase/ Decrease -1.%11..% 2..%111..% 12..%2. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page I ofj

13 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER 7?48 _. VERSION Proposed Rentals 644 Textbooks, & Instructional Aids Property 67 Redemption of Principal 6831, 6832 All Other Prior Budget % Interest Object Codes FY FY Increase/ 6841, 6842, 685 (excluding 69) Decrease 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service Subtotal i _t------; Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service Subtotal (lines 27-31) (lines 26 & 32) (Include in Fund 61 Budget, page 4, lines 2-9) t------i Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 2 of3

14 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY _M_an_ _co...!p_a CTDNUMBER VERSION Proposed ILnl!.u~n Language Learners Supplement English Immersion Fund 71 1 Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff ITE Budget FY Salaries 61 Benefits 62 Services 63,64, 65 Supplies 1. r--~r---;-----;-----~ _, r--~r---;-----;-----~ _, 66 Property 67 Other 68 % Increase/ Decrease 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 27 Student Transportation 29 Other ~ 5.r-~-~--.r---r-----~------r ~ 6. 7.r--~r---;-----;-----~ _, 1 Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 27 Student Transportation 11. r--~r---;-----;-----~ _, Other Rev. S/14-FY 215 Page3 of3

15 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 C OUNTY~M~an~ c~op~a~ CTD 7248 Districtwid e Desegregation Budget, Fiscal Yea r 215 [A.R S (J) and (K)] Employee Purchased Maintenance and Operation (M&O) F und ~=-~- FTE Salaries Benefits Services Supplies Prior Budget 63,64, Expenditures FY FY Desegrtgation - Regular Education I Classroom Instruction I ,915, ,566 24,822 2 Support Services 21 Students , ,81 11, Instructional Staff ,531 26,87 13, ,99 23 General Administration School Administration Central Services 6. 9,45 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant Other Operation ofnoninstructional Services 9.. Subtotal (lines 1-9) ,172,238 1,364,183 34, , Desegregation - Special Education l Classroom instruction II.. 2 Support Services 21 Students ,886 96, Instructional Staff General Administration School Administration Central Services Operation & Maintenance of Plant Other Operation ofnoninstructional Services 19.. Subtotal (lines 11-19) ,886 96, Desegrtgation - Pupil Transportation Desegn gation - ELL Incremental Costs Classroom Instruction Support Services 21 Students Instructional Staff General Administration School Administration Central Services Operation & Maintenance of Plant , 2 7 Student Transportation Other Operation ofnoninstructional Services 31.. Subtotal (lines 22-31) , Number of individual school budgets Totals Other Prior Budget 68 FY FY 4,864,94 4,916, , ,591 1,114,21 1,85,713 9,45 9,45 6,725,992 6,73,1 45, ,158 45, ,158 1, 1, 1, 1, % Increase/ Decrease 1.1% I -2.7% 2-2.6% 3.%4.% ~.% 6. f.% '17..% I. % 19. ~ 1% l..% l I. -.9% l 2..% l 3..% l 4..% l 5..% I 6..% I 7..% I 8..% I %; 2..%; 21..%; 22..% 23..% 24..% 25..% 26..% 27..% 28..% 29..% 3..% 31..%-32. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 1 of6

16 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY~M~m== c~op~a~ CTD 7248 ~ ! M&O Fund (Conclu~ed) FTE Salaries - --~ -... Prior Budget Expenditures FY FY Desegregation - ELL Compensatory Instruction - I Classroom Instruction Support Services 21 Students Instructional Staff General Administration School Administration Central Services Operation & Maintenance of Plant Student Transportation Other Operation ofnoninstructional Services 42.. Subtotal (lines 33-42) Total M&O Fund Desegregation (lines 1, 2, 21, 32, & 43) (to Budget, page 1, line 25) (1) ,522,124 Districtwide Desegregation Budget, Fiscal Year 215 [A.R.S (J) and (K)] Employee Purchased Benefits Services Supplies Other 63, 64, ,46,455 44, ,812 Totals Prior Budget FY FY 7,186,169 7,186,168 % Increase/ Decrease.% i 33..% 34..% 35..% 36..% 37..% 38..% 39..% 4..% 41..% 42..% 43..% 44. (I) In accordance with A.R.S (K), the total amount budgeted for desegregation expenditures in the M&O, UCO, and IA Funds cannot exceed the amount budgeted in FY 29. Desegregation Revenues A.R.S (J)(3)(a), (h) & (j): Tax:Levy: 7,382,169 Other (description): ---- Other (description): ---- Other (description): Employees needed to conduct Desegregation activities Teachers I Administrators I Others I Total 71 I 3 I 35 I The date that the school district was determined to be out of compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 United States Code Section 2d) and the basis for that determination. A.R.S (J)(3)(c) 2. The initial date that the school district began to levy property taxes to provide funding for desegregation expenses. A.R.S (1) (3)(d) 3. An estimate of when the school district will be in compliance with the court order or administrative agreement. A.R.S (J)(3)(r) 6/8/1986 Ongoing Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 2 of6

17 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY~M~an~ c~olpa~ Districtwide Desegregation Budget, Fiscal Year 215 [A.R.S (J) and (K)] CTD 7248 In restricted Capital Outlay, (UCO) Fund 511 Desegregation - Regular Education I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service Library Books, Textbooks, & Redemption of Interest Rentals Instructional Aids Property Principal 6841, 6842, :~I I I I 8 ObJect Codes Budget Increase/ All Other I % ( excludmg 69) FY Decrease Desegregation - Special Education I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service ::1 ~ I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service Desegregation -~ELL Compensatory Instruction 1 Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service Subtotal Total UCO Fund Desegregation (lines SO, 56, 57, 63, & 69) (Inclnde in Fund 61 (2) In accordance with A.R.S (K), the total amount budgeted for desegregation expenditures in the M&O, UCO, and IA Funds cannot exceed the amount budgeted in FY 29. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 3 of6

18 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY_M_an c_o~pa CTD 7248 Districtwide Impact Aid Fund Desegregation Budget, Fiscal Year 215 [A.RS (J) and (K) and 15-95(R)] Aid (la) Fund Salaries 61 Employee Benefits 62 Purchased Services 63, 64, 65 Supplies Other Prior % Increase/ 1 Desegregation - Regular Education 1 Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 29 Other 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services Subtotal I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 29 Other 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services ll-1 I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 27 Student Transportation 29 Other 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 4 of6

19 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTD 7248 la Fund 515 Desegregation - ELL Compensatory Instruction Districtwide Salaries Fiscal Year 215 Employee Benefits 61 I Purchased Services Supplies 63, 64, I Other 68 I Prior Budget FY % Increase/ Decrease 1 Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 21 Students 22 Instructional Staff 23 General Administration 24 School Administration 25 Central Services 26 Operation & Maintenance of Plant 27 Student Transportation 29 Other (I) In accordance with A.R.S O(K), the total amount budgeted for desegregation expenditures in the M&O, UCO, and la Funds cannot exceed the amount budgeted in FY 29. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 5 of6

20 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY~M~an~ c~olp~a CTD 7248 Districtwide Rentals Library Books, Textbooks, & Instructional Aids Property % Increase/ Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service ::1 I I 1 Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service ::1 ~ I Desegregation - ELL Incremental Costs I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation ofnoninstructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service I Classroom Instruction 2 Support Services 3 Operation of Non instructional Services 4 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 5 Debt Service Subtotal (2) In accordance with A.RS (K), the total amount budgeted for desegregation expenditures in the M&O, UCO, and la Funds cannot exceed the amount budgeted in FY 29. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 6 of6

21 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District COUNTY _M_an_ c_o,_pa Desegregation Activity/Magnet Programs '- - ~ I CTD 7248 Program Name Description ( 1) FY 215 Student Capacity (2) FY 214 Number Students Served (3) Districtwide (4) Schools (5) Activity or Magnet Program (6) SUSD English Language Development Program (ELD). Educationals programs provided to ELL Students and the monitoring of follow-up students Yes 3 Activity (1) (2) Enter the capacity, in number of students who may participate in the program. (3) Enter the number of students served by each program in FY 214. (4) Indicate if this program is offered in all schools in the district. Select from the drop down list. (5) If the program is not offered at all schools, list each school, by CTDS, at which the program is offered. Separate each CTDS with a comma. Even though all text may not display, field will hold in excess of 3, characters. Description may be copied and pasted into this cell. (6) Indicate if the item described is an activity [A.R.S (J)(3)(b)] or a magnet program [A.R.S O(J)(3)(e)]. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 1 of 1

22 Desegregation Verification RepOI1ing Fiscal Year 215 A.R.S. ~ (.1)(3) District Name: Scottsdale Unified School District CTD: 7248 A.R.S. I 5-91 (1)(3) X X (d) any dates that property tax levies to provide funding for desegregation expenses were increased. (k) verification that the desegregation funding will supplement and not supplant funding for other academic and extracurricular activities. X (I) verification that the desegregation funding is educationally justifiable. X X X X X X X (m) any documentation that supports the proposition that the requested desegregation funding is intended to result in equal education opportunities for all pupils in the school district. (n) verification that the desegregation funding will be used to promote systemic and organizational changes within the school district. (o) verification that the desegregation funding will be used in accordance with the academic standards adopted by the State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S and (p) verification that the desegregation funding will be used to accomplish specific actions to remediate proven discrimination pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 United States Code section 2d) as specified in the court order or administrative agreement. (q) an evaluation by the school district of the effectiveness of the school district's desegregation measures. (r) an estimate of when the school district will be in compliance with the court order or administrative agreement and a detailed account of the steps that the school district will take to achieve compliance. (s) any other information that the di stri ct deems necessary to assist ADE in carrying out the purposes of this paragraph. Please check each reporting item approved by the governing board of the school district. The determination that the documentation being submitted to the Arizona Department of Education, meets the requirements listed above has been made by the district. All submitted documentation will be provided to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairpersons of the education committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives, as required by A.R.S. I I certify that the attached documents of the District, meet the requirements outlined in A.R.S. I 5-91 (.1)(3), li sted above, and have been authorized by the Governing Board of the District?:: to the Arizona Department of Education. &.,... ~ Mrs. Bonnie Sneed President of the Go ~ erning Board (signature) President name (printed) Mail original signed document to: ADE, School Finance 1535 West Jefferson, Bin 13 Phoenix, AZ 857 In addition, electronic copies of documentation, in either Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, or in portable document format (pdf), should be e mai led to ).JJ}\I~!gr:;O :filid..@!lzgs_lggy. Electronic copies may also be submitted via a CD, if file size is too large for . Mail COs to the address to the left. Rev. 5/14-FY 215

23 SUMMARY OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed I certify that the Budget of Scottsdale Unified School District, Maricopa County for fiscal year 215 was officially proposed by the Governing Board on June 3rd, 214, and that the complete Proposed Ex penditure Budget may be reviewed by contacting Daniel O'Brien at the District Office, telephone M ing n~s hours. 7 President of the Governing Board I. Student Count 2. Tax Rates: FY 214 FY 215 Secondary rate applies only for Prior Yr. Budeet Yr. Prior Estimated voter-approved overrides and 213 ADM 214ADM FY Bud!!et FY bonded indebtedness per A.R.S. Resident 24, , Primary Rate (22) and Joint Technical Education Districts per A.R.S. Attending 24, , Secondary Rate (F). 3. The Maintenance and Operation, Classroom Site, and Unrestricted Capital Outlay budgets cannot exceed their respective budget limits. Maintenance & Operation 143,81,95 GBL 143,81,95 Classroom Site 11,723,674 CSFBL 11,723,674 Unrestricted Capital Outlay 17,97,475 UCBL 17,97,475 1 Regular Education MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION EXPENDITURES % lnc./(decr.) Salaries and Benefits Other TOTAL from Prior FY Budget FY Prior FY Budget FY Prior FY Budget FY Prior FY I Instruction 52,871,268 49,353,595 1,893,49 2,625,98 54,764,317 51,978, % 2 Support Services 21 Students 4,78,796 3,998,948 23,467 89,528 4,12,263 4,88, % 22 Instructional Staff 4,128,336 3,972, , ,19 4,372,891 4,335,98 -.8% 23, 24, 25 Administration 13,551,495 12,741,569 1,843,271 1,986,85 15,394,766 14,727, % 26 Opcr./Maint. of Plant 8,932,988 8,899,636 13,2,366 12,12,954 22,133,354 21,2,59-5.% 29 Other.% 3 Oper. of No ninstructional Services 223, , , , , ,945-2.% 61 School-Sponsored Cocurric. Activities 285, ,29 285, ,29-2.2% 62 School-Sponsored Athletics 1,34,571 1,319,65 238,8 238,8 1,542,579 1,557,613 1.% 63, 7, 8, 9 Other Programs.% Regular Ed ucation Subsection Subtotal 85,376,582 8,781,875 I7,572, I47 17,552,294 I 2,948,729 98,334, I69-4.5% 2 Special Ed ucation 1 Instruction 22,36,363 21,53,I 76 3,8 198,299 22,39,443 2I,728,475 -I4% 2 Support Services 21 Students 2,876,759 2,763, ,962 2,876,759 3,3,754 54% 22 Instructional Staff 757, ,61 7,8 7,8 765, ,41 -I7.3% 23, 24, 25 Administration 2, 2, 2, 2,.% 26 Opcr./Mai nt. of Plant.% 29 Other.% 3 Oper. of Noninstructional Services.% Special Ed ucation Subsection Subtotal 25,67,775 24,919,569 12,88 475,6I 25,683,655 25,394,63 -l.l% 4 Pupil Transportation 6, 194,839 6,382,752 I,532,77 1,45,58 7,726,916 7,833,332 I4% 51 Desegregation 6,982,58 6,982,579 23,589 23,589 7,I 86,169 7,I 86,168.% 52 Special K-3 Program Override 3,254,51 3,1 I7,483 14,I63 3,254,51 3,221,646-1.% 53 Dropout Prevention Programs I 83, ,634 37,254 67,496 22I, I3 221,13.% 54 Joint Career and Technical Education and Vocational Education Center.% 55 K-3 Reading Program 99,45 89,2 99,45 89,2-2.1% TOTAL EXPENDITURES I 28,572, ,227,9I2 19,357,947 19,853, ,93, I ,81,95-3.3% Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page I of2

24 SUMMARY OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET (Concl'd) CTD NUMBER 7248 TOTAL EXPENDITURES BY FUND Increase/ % Increase/ Budgeted Ex penditures (Decrease) (Decrease) Fund from from Prior FY Budget FY Prior FY Prior FY Maintenance & Operation 147,93, ,81,95 (4,849,5) -3.3% Instructional Improvement 1,884,114 2,141, , % Structured Engl ish Immersion.% Compensatory Instruction.% Student Success 485, ,84 1 Classroom Site 9,924,22 11,723,674 1,799, % Federal Projects 11,,57 9,13,349 (I,87,221) -17.% State Projects 131,8 76,76 (55,4) -41.8% Unrestricted Capital Outlay 14,661,47 17,97,475 2,436, % New School Facilities.% Adjacent Ways 2,, 3,, 1,, 5.% Debt Service 34,775,335 32,796,535 ( l,978,8) -5.7% School Plant Funds 2,336,472 2,698,97 362, % Auxiliary Operations 1,364, 1,623, , % Bond Bu il di ng 6,213,836 (6,213,836) -1.% Food Service 11,444,938 11,223,71 (221,228) -1.9% Other 23,383,78 23,379,184 (4,596).% VERSION Proposed ---'---- M&O FUN D SPEC IAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS BY T YP E Program (A. R.S and 15-93) Prior FY Budget FY Autism 5,44,623 7,347,429 PROPOSED STAFFING SUMMARY Emotional Disability 448, ,188 Staff- Pupil Hearing Impairment 73,I4 1,75,664 Staff Type FTE Ratio Other Health Impairments 1,238,926 1,47,8 14 Certified -- Specific Learning Disability 4,81,22 5,29,3 1 Superi ntendent, Pri ncipals, Mi ld, Moderate or Severe Intellectual Disability 426,53 473,283 Other Administrators 89 1 to 27.9 Multiple Disabilities 143, ,523 Teachers 1,278 1 to I8.9 Multiple Disabi liti es with S.S.I. I 12,245 17,699 Other to Orthopedic Impairment 68, ,381 Subtotal 1,479 1 to 16.3 Developmental Delay 61, ,267 Classified -- Preschool Severe Delay 237, ,649 Managers, Supervisors, Directors 19 1 to Speech/Language Impairment 9,746,886 4,76,145 Teachers Aides to 9 1. Traumatic Brain Inj ury 31,429 28,95 Other to 27.8 Visual Impairment 686,898 1, 18,473 Subtotal 1,24 1 to 19.4 Subtotal 23,572,771 23,22,641 TOTAL 2,7 19 I to 8.9 Gifted Education 1,747,921 1,781,667 Remedial Education Special Education -- ELL Incremental Costs Teacher 28 1 to 9.I ELL Compensatory Instruction Staff 37 I to 8.3 Vocational and Technological Education 362, ,322 Career Education TOTAL 25,683,655 25,394,63 Rev. 5/14-FY 215 Page 1 of2

25 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District : COUNTY_M..;..an~ c..;..op~a CTD NUMBER 7248 VERSION Proposed DATE 6/4/214 BUDGET WORK SHEETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 215 A. B. C. C2. D. E. F. G. H. J. K. K2. L. M.. R. WORK SHEET TITLE Adjustment for Tuition Loss and Student Revenue Loss Phase-Down (Optional). Support Level Weights and PSD-12 Weighted Student Counts. Base Support Level and Base Revenue Control Limit Weighted Student Count: AOI Students Transportation Support Level and Transportation Revenue Control Limit. District Support Level and Revenue Control Limit Consolidation/Unification Assistance District Additional Assistance High School Student Count (Type 3). District Additional Assistance.. Equalization Base and Assistance. Small School Adjustment Phase Down Limit. Maximum Small School Adjustment Override Impact Aid Fund (ESEA, Title VIII) Maintenance and Operation Fund Budget Balance Carryforward. Tuition Out for High School Students. Student Success Fund PAGE S. Equalization Assistance for an Accommodation School Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 2 of 15

26 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District# COUNTY..;.M;.;.a;:;r..:.;ic:..;;o""'p.;:.. a CTD NUMBER 7248 A. WORK SHEET FOR ADJUSTMENT FOR TUITION LOSS and STUDENT REVENUE LOSS PHASE-DOWN (OPTIONAL) (A.R.S and ) NOTE 1: Only complete this section if the district receives less tuition from a district which is inside or outside of this state because the district of residence began to offer instruction in one or more high school grade levels not previously offered. If the district of residence is a joint unified district that phases instruction in over more than 1 year, complete a separate Work Sheet for each phase. I. A. Base year (FY )Attending ADM Grades Base year is defmed as the year before the other district began to offer instruction. B. Factor of 5% C. ADM loss required to qualify (line LAx line I.B) D. Number oftuitioned students lost in the year after the base year due to district of residence offering instruction in Grades 9-12 not offered previously.5. NOTE 2: If line I.C is greater than line I.D, do not complete the rest of this section. District does not qualify for an increase in the base support level (BSL). E. Tuition received in base year F. Tuition received in fiscal year after base year G. Tuition loss (line I.E -line I.F) (If less than, enter ) H. Enter the appropriate BSL adjustment factor: For the first year after the base year, the BSL adjustment is.75 For the second year after the base year, the BSL adjustment is.5 For the third year after the base year, the BSL adjustment is.25 I. Increase in BSL for Tuition Loss Adjustment (line I.G x line I. H) (to Work Sheet C, line X).. II. In addition to any adjustment for tuition loss received pursuant to A.R.S , a district which loses students from its student count resulting from the formation of a joint unified school district (pursuant to A.R.S ) and does not receive tuition for those students for the budget year, may increase its BSL (A.R.S ). The applicable increase(s) for Student Revenue Loss Phase-Down should be recorded on Work Sheet C, line XI: A. A district which loses at least 5 students may increase the BSL: 1. By 65, for the first year of the loss. 2. By 6, for the second year following the loss. 3. By 5, for the third year following the loss. 4. By 3, for the fourth year following the loss. 5. By 1, for the fifth year following the loss. B. A union high school district may increase the BSL: 1. By 1, if it loses at least 5 students in the first year. 2. By 2, if it loses an additional 5 students in the second year. 3. By 325, if it loses an additional 5 students in the third year. 4. By 2, in the fourth year if it was eligible for the third year loss. 5. By 1, in the fifth year if it was eligible for the fourth year loss. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 1 of 15

27 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER 7248 B. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 SUPPORT LEVEL WEIGHTS AND PSD-12 WEIGHTED STUDENT COUNTS (A.R.S ) c. STUDENT COUNT 3. Charter School (from line A.5) a. K-8 b Total a. K-8 (C.2.a + C.3.a) b (C.2.b + C.3.b) 5. Total Student Count (C.1 + C.4.a+ C.4.b) Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 2 of15

28 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District II COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER 7248 ~~~ ~~~---- C. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 BASE SUPPORT LEVEL (BSL) AND BASE REVENUE CONTROL LIMIT (BRCL) (A.R.S , , and E) WEIGHTED STUDENT I. A. FY 215 Non-AOI Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line C.5) B. Student Count Add-ons (1) 1. Hearing Impairment 2. K-3 3. K-3 Reading (2) 4. English Learners (ELL) 5. MD-R, A-R, and SID-R 6. MD-SC, A-SC, and SID-SC 7. Multiple Disabilities Severe Sensory Impairment 8. Orthopedic Impairment (Resource) 9. Orthopedic Impairment (Self Contained) 1. Preschool-Severe Delay 11. DD, ED, MilD, SLD, SLI, & OHI 12. Emotional Disability (Private) 13. Moderate Intellectual Disability 14. Visual Impairment 15. Total Add-on Count (I.B.1 through l.b.14) II. FY 215 Non-AOI Weighted Student Count III. FY 215 AOI FT Weighted Student Count (from Work Sheet C2, line II) IV. FY 215 AOI PT Weighted Student Count (from Work Sheet C2, line IV) Adjusted AOI AOI Weighted Weighted Student Student Count x Funding Ratio = Count X 95% = X 85% =.192 CALCULATION OF FY 215 BSL AND BRCL V. Total Weighted Student Count line II + III+ IV) VI. A. Base Level Amount To include Teacher Compensation, use Base Level od 3, For Career Ladder and Optional Performance Incentive Program districts, add increase of ~%approved by the district governing board (A.R.S , , and ) (3) B. Increase for 2 Days oflnstruction (line VI. Ax 5%) (A.R.S ) C. Adjusted FY 215 Base Level Amount (line VI.A + VI.B) (to Work Sheet K, line I.G and II. G) VII. Result (line V x VI.C) , VIII. Teacher Experience Index (TEl) (If actual TEl is less than 1. use 1.) IX. Result (line VII x VIII) X. Increase for Tuition Loss Adjustment (from all copies of Work Sheet A, line 1.1) XI. Increase for Student Revenue Loss Phase-Down (from Work Sheet A, line II) XII. Increase for Career Ladder [A.R.S (A)(5)] (3) XIII. FY 213 Nonfederal Audit Service Actual Expenditures (4) x 1. = XIV. Decreases for Charter School Federal and State Monies Received XV. Decrease for Charter School Nonparticipation Adjustment XVI. Other Reductions: (For FY 215 this amount is zero, unless otherwise notified by ADE) - XVII. FY 215 BSL and BRCL (sum lines IX through XIII minus lines XIV through XVI) (to Work Sheet E, line I ) 114,982, Portion ofline IX amount from total K-3 and total K-3 Reading weighted student counts: (2) K K-3 Reading (I) The Non-AOI Student Count for districts with district sponsored charter schools (DSCS) includes the district student count plus the estimated charter school student count for students that did not attend a district school last year. (2) Districts assigned a letter grade of C, D, or F, in accordance with A.R.S , or that have more than I % of their pupils in grade three reading far below the third grade level according to the reading portion of the AIMS test, will receive monies for this weight only after the district's K-3 Reading Program Plan is approved by the State Board of Education. A.R.S (3) In accordance with Laws 2 II, Ch. 29, 32, the maximum base level increase for a career ladder and optional performance incentive programs is I% for FY 215. (4) A.R.S F allows districts to increase the BSL if financial and compliance audit costs will be incurred for the budget year. Enter the FY 213 nonfederal audit expenditures on line Xill. Enter the FY 213 federal audit expenditures from all funds to the right (should agree to FY 213 AFR). Enter the total FY 213 audit expenditures from all funds to the right. Do not include costs of consulting or other nonaudit services paid to audit firms (e.g., application fees paid for submission of district's reports to ASBO and GFOA for certification or for the preparation of the Meritorious Budget Award application to ASBO) in the amounts reported on Line XIII or in this footnote. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 3 of 15

29 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District I! COUNTY..:;M..:;a::.n::..:; c.;;,op"-=a;... CTD NUMBER _...;..7-'-'::..:;2;..;.4..;;.8;;..;::..:; C2. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 WEIGHTED STUDENT COUNT: AOI STUDENTS (A.R.S and ) Note: To be completed by school districts that offer AOI instruction. AOI FULL-TIME (FT) WEIGHTED STUDENT COUNT ~ ~ ~----~~--~ AOIFT AOIFT I. A. FY 215 AOI FT Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line C.5) B. Student Count Add-ons I. Hearing Impairment 2. K-3 3. K-3 Reading (I) 4. English Learners (ELL) 5. MD-R, A-R, and SID-R 6. MD-SC, A-SC, and SID-SC 7. Multiple Disabilities Severe Sensory Impairment 8. Orthopedic Impairment (Resource) 9. Orthopedic Impairment (Self Contained) I. Preschool-Severe Delay 11. DD, ED, MilD, SLD, SLI, & OHI 12. Emotional Disability (Private) 13. Moderate Intellectual Disability 14. Visual Impairment 15. Total Add-on Count (I.B.1 through I.B.14) II. FY 215 AOI FT Weighted Student Count III. A. FY 215 AOI PT Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line C.5) B. Student Count Add-ons 1. Hearing Impairment 2. K-3 3. K-3 Reading (I) 4. English Learners (ELL) 5. MD-R, A-R, and SID-R 6. MD-SC, A-SC, and SID-SC 7. Multiple Disabilities Severe Sensory Impairment 8. Orthopedic Impairment (Resource) 9. Orthopedic Impairment (Self Contained) I. Preschool-Severe Delay 11. DD, ED, MilD, SLD, SLI, & OHI 12. Emotional Disability (Private) 13. Moderate Intellectual Disability 14. Visual Impairment 15. Total Add-on Count (III.B.1 through Ill.B.14) IV. FY 215 AOI PT Weighted Student Count AOI PART-TIME (PT) WEIGHTED STUDENT COUNT ~ ~ ~ AOIPT Student AOIPT (I) Districts assigned a letter grade of C, D, or F, in accordance with A.R.S , or that have more than I % of their pupils in grade three reading far below the third grade level according to the reading portion of the AIMS test, will receive monies for this weight only after the district's K-3 Reading Program Plan is approved by the State Board of Education. A.R.S Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 4 of15

30 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY_M_a_ri_c_,op_a CfD NUMBER 7248 D. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT LEVEL (fsl) (A.R.S , as amended by Laws 214, Cb. 17, 6, and ) AND TRANSPORTATION REVENUE CONTROL LIMIT (TRCL) (A.R.S ) TABLE I Approved Daily Route Miles per Eligible Student Transported I..5 or Less ll. More than.5, through 1. lll. More than 1. FY 215 State Support Level per Route Mile TABLE U FACTORS Approved Daily Route Miles per Eligible Students Transported I. 1. or Less ll. More than 1. Unified or an Accommodation School that offers instruction In grades 9-12 or a Common School District Not In a High School District (Type 1, 2, or 3) Common School District within a High School District or an Accommodation School that does not offer instruction in grades 9-12 (Type 1 or 4).1.12 High School District (Type OS).25.3 TSL CALCULATION I. Approved Daily Route Miles per Eligible Student Transported A. FY 214 Approved Daily Route Miles B. Number of Eligible Students Transported in FY 214 C. Approved Daily Route Miles per Eligible Student Transported (I. A + I. B) II. To and From School Support Level A. Annual Route Miles (Line I.A x 18 or 2, as applicable) Ocheck here if approved for 2 Days oflnstruction B. State Support Level per Route Mile (use Table I based on I. C) C. 1. FY 214 Annual Expenditure for Bus Tokens 2. FY 214 Annual Expenditure for Bus Passes D. To and From School Support Level [(II.A x II.B) + II.C.1 + II.C.2] III. Academic Education, Career and Technical Education, Vocational Education, and Athletic Trips Support Level A. Factor from Table II (based on I.C and district type) B. Academic Education, Career and Technical Education, Vocational Ed., and Athletic Trips Support Level (II.A x II.B x III.A) IV. Extended School Year Support Level fur Pupils with Disabilities A. Actual Route Miles traveled in July and August 213 to Transport Pupils w/disabilities for Extended School Year B. Estimated Route Miles Traveled in June 214 to Transport Pupils w/disabilities for Extended School Year C. Total Extended School Year Route Miles (IV.A + IV.B) D. State Support Level per Route Mile (use Table I based on I. C) E. Extended School Year Support Level for Pupils with Disabilities (IV.C x IV.D) V. FY 215 TSL (lines II.D + III.B + IV.E) (to Work Sheet E, line III) VI. Support Level Change A. FY 214 Transportation Support Level B. Transportation Support Level Change (If result is negative, enter ) (V- VI.A) TRCL CALCULATION VII. FY 214 Transportation Revenue Control Limit VIII. FY 215 Transportation Revenue Control Limit A. Preliminary FY 215 Transportation Revenue Control Limit (VI.B + VII) B. 12% offy 215 Transportation Support Level (V x 1.2) C. Adjusted FY 215 Transportation Revenue Control Limit (ifline VIlLA is greater than line VIII.B use line VII, otherwise use line VIII.A.) D. FY 215 Transportation Revenue Control Limit (the greater of line V or VIII. C) (to Work Sheet E, line VII) 11, , ,3, ,991 z , ,292. 8, , ,936, ,11, ,11, ,11, ,123, ,11, ,11, Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 5 of15

31 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District# COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER ----~ E. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 DISTRICT SUPPORT LEVEL (DSL) AND REVENUE CONTROL LIMIT (RCL) (A.R.S and ) CALCULATION OF THE DSL I. FY 215 Base Support Level/Base Revenue Control Limit (from Work Sheet C, line XVII) II. Tuition Out for High School Students (from Work Sheet, line 13) [Applies only to tuition for high school students if the District of Residence is a common school NOT within a high school district (Type 3).] III. FY 215 Transportation Support Level (from Work Sheet D, line V) IV. FY 215 District Support Level (sum of lines I through III) 114,982, ,936, ,918, CALCULATION OF THE RCL V. FY 215 Base Support Level/Base Revenue Control Limit (from line I above) VI. Tuition Out for High School Students (from Work Sheet, line 13) [Applies only to tuition for high school students if the District of Residence is a common school NOT within a high school district (Type 3).] VII. FY 215 Transportation Revenue Control Limit (from Work Sheet D, line VIII.D) VIII. FY 215 Revenue Control Limit (sum of lines V through VII) [to Budget, page 7, line 1(a)] 114,982, ,11, ,83, F. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 CONSOLIDATION/UNIFICATION ASSISTANCE (A.R.S and ) I. Consolidation/Unification Increase for Transitional Costs incurred in first year II. FY 215 District Support Level (line I+ Work Sheet E, line IV) III. FY 215 Revenue Control Limit (line I+ Work Sheet E, line VIII) [to Budget, page 7, line 1(a)].. G. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 DISTRICT ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT COUNT FOR COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOT WITHIN A HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (TYPE 3) (A.R.S C) I. High School Student Count Tuitioned Out (from Work Sheet, line 6). II. High School Student Count Transported by District of Residence to District of Attendance III. 5% of High School Student Count Transported by District of Residence to District of Attendance (Line II x.5) (to Work Sheet H, line V.A column 9-12). Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 6 of 15

32 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa... CTD NUMBER 7248 H. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 DISTRICT ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE (DAA) (A.R.S , , C, , , and B, as amended by Laws 214, Ch. 17, 1, 2, 12, 13, and 14) TABLE TO CALCULATE DAA PER STUDENT COUNT K I. FY 215 Actual Student Count: DAA per Student Count II. FY 215 Actual Student Count: A. Student Count Constant B. Actual Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line A.4).. C. Difference.. D. Weight Adjustment Factor X.3 X.4 E. Support Level Weight Increas;:.. F. Support Level Weight G. Adjusted Support Level Weight.. H. Support Level Amount X X I. DAA per Student Count -. =. III. FY 215 Actual Student Count: A. Student Count Constant B. Actual Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line A.4).. C. Difference.. D. Weight Adjustment Factor X.12 X.13 E. Support Level Weight lncreas;:.. F. Support Level Weight G. Adjusted Support Level Weight.. H. Support Level Amount X X I. DAA per Student Count IV. FY 215 Actual Student Count: 6. or More & JTED DAA per Student Count CALCULATIONS FOR DAA PSD K V. District Additional Assistance Base A. FY 215 Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line A.4 and Work Sheet G, line III for type 3 districts) , , B. DAA per Student Count (from Table above) C. DAA Base (line V.A x line V.B) VI. District Additional Assistance Growth Factor A. FY 215 Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line A.4 and Work Sheet G, line II for type 3 districts) B. FY 214 Student Count C. FY 215 DAA Growth Factor (VI.A + VI.B) VII. Adjusted District Additional Assistance A. DAA Base (from line V.C) B. Adjusted Growth Factor (ifline VI.C is < or= 1.5, use 1., if> 1.5, use 1 plus 5% of the increase) C. FY 215 DAA (VILA x VII.B) D. DAA for High School Textbooks X = X = X X ;_.;;..._ 26,881.7 = 6,934, =...;. 4...;., 1_.;.6..;..;3 ':..:..6.:...;8_.;..5_7 26, , , ,934, '--' ; 4,1 63,68.57 l.qqqq X 1. X 1. ~--~~~~~ 26,881.7 = 6,934, ;..._...;. = 4,163, FY 215 Actual9-12 Student Count (from Work SheetB, line A.4) 8, Support Level Amount for Textbooks x...:.. 6_9._6_8 3. DAA for Textbooks (VII.D.1 x VII.D.2) =...:.. 58;...;8.:...,4_7_4. 5..;..; E DAA (including charter additional assistance and capital transportation adjustment from lines below) 1. FY DAA (9-12 lines VII.C + VII.D.3 + VII.G.3 + VII.H) (to Budget, page 7, line 2.a) =...:.. 4_:,_75_1.:...,5_4_ DAA Reduction for State Budget Adjustments (to Budget, page 7, line 2.b) -...:.. 2:...,4_5_4:..., 7_3_ Adjusted FY DAA (VII.E.1-VII.E.2) (to Work Sheet J, line Ill.A.1 or III.B.5) =...:.. 2_:,_29_6.:..., F. PSD and K-8 DAA (including charter additional assistance and capital transportation adjustment from lines below) 1. FY 215 PSD and K-8 DAA (PSD and K-8 lines VII.C + VII.G.3 + VII.H) (to Budget, page 7, line 2.a) =...:.. 6.;...:,_96;_1.:...,8...:..5--._2..;..;6 2. PSD and K-8 DAA Reduction for State Budget Adjustments (to Budget, page 7, line 2.b) -~ 4:...,4 8_9:...,1_5_3._6_ 3. Adjusted FY 215 PSD and K-8 DAA (VII.F.1-VII.F.2) (to Work Sheet J, line III.A.1 or III.B.5) =...:.. 2_:,_47_2..:..,6_9_6._6_6 G. Charter Additional Assistance (CAA) 1. FY 215 Charter School Student Count (from Work Sheet B, line A.5) 2. CAA per Student 3. FY 215 CAA (line VII.G.1 x line VII.G.2) X = PSD. 1, K , , 'H.~, Capital Transportation Adjustment A.R.S B Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 7 of15

33 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY.;;.M.:..:a;.;..ri;,.;.co.:..p:..:.a CTD NUMBER J. WORK SHEET FOR EQUALIZATION BASE AND ASSISTANCE (A.R.S A and.b) NOTE: Common School Districts NOT within a High School District (Type 3) should only complete Sections I and III.B l. A. Total FY 215 PSD and K-8 Weighted State Aid Student Count I. PSD (from Work Sheet B, line C. I) 2. K-8 (from Work Sheet B. line C.4.a, Total Non-AOI and AOI Counts) B. Total FY 215 PSD-8 and 9-12 Weighted State Aid Student Count (Total Non-AOI and AOI Counts) C. Total FY 215 Weighted State Aid Student Count (line I.B PSD-8 column column) D. PSD-8 and 9-12 Factors (line I.B +line I. C) II. A. Lesser of District Support level (DSL) or Revenue Control Limit (RCL) (from Work Sheet E, line IV or Vlll, or Work Sheet F, line II or Ill) (to Work Sheet S, line LA) B. DSURCL PSD-8 and 9-12 Allocation (line I.D x line II.A) Ill. A. For ALL Districts Except Common School Districts NOT Within a High School District (Type 3) I. Adjusted FY 215 District Additional Assistance (from Work Sheet H) 2. Total FY 215 Equalization Base (II.B + IIJ.A.l) Primary Assessed Valuation Salt River Project (SRP) Valuation Government Property Lease Excise Tax Assessed Valuation TOTAL Valuation (III.A.3 + lll.a.4 + III.A.5) 7. Qualifying Tax Rate 8. Qualifying Levy (III.A.6 x III.A.7) 9. FY 215 Equalization Assistance Before Adjustments (lll.a.2- III.A.8) 1. FY 215 State Aid Decrease for Districts participating in Career Ladder Program (.375 x BSL from Work Sheet C, line xvm (Laws 1992, Ch. 158, 2) Unified districts use PSD-8 column only. (For FY 215 this amount is zero, unless otherwise notified by ADE.) 11. Total FY 215 Equalization Assistance (III.A.9- Ili.A.lO) B. For Common School Districts NOT Within a High School District (Type 3) I. Lesser of District Support Level (DSL) or Revenue Control Limit (RCL) (from Work Sheet E, line IV or VIII, or Work Sheet F, line II or Ill) 2. Tuition Out for High School Students (from Work Sheet E, line II or VI) 3. Adjusted DSURCL (Ill. B. I - III.B.2) 4. DSURCL PSD-8 and 9-12 Allocation 5. Adjusted FY 215 District Additional Assistance (from Work Sheet H) 6. FY 215 Equalization Base (III.B.4 + III.B.5) Primary Assessed Valuation Salt River Project (SRP) Valuation Government Property Lease Excise Tax Assessed Valuation + I 1. TOTAL Valuation (III.B.7 + lll.b.8 + Ili.B.9) II. ' Qualifying Tax Rate 12. Qualifying Levy (III.B.lO x III.B.Il) 13. FY 215 Equalization Assistance Before Adjustments (Ill.B.6-III.B.l2) 14. FY 215 State Aid Decrease for Districts participating in Career Ladder Program (.375 x BSL from Work Sheet C, line XVII) (Laws 1992, Ch. 158, 2) (For FY 215 this amount is zero, unless otherwise notified by ADE.) 15. Total FY 215 Equalization Assistance (III.B.l3 - III.B.l4) PSD , ,92.37 (I.A. I + I.A.2) ,658, ,472, (from Work Shed. H, line VII.F.3) 78,131, , , ,91.83 x , ,194, ,194, (line lii.b.jx i.d). (from Work Sheet H. line VTI.F.3).. x , ,918, ,78.75 (from Work Shed 8, line CA. b) ,259, ,296,86.1 (from Work Shea H, line VII. E.)) 47,556, , , ,91.83 x , ,619, ,619, ((line IU.BJ "'I.D)+Ill,B.2]. (from Work Sheet H, line VII.E.3).. x... Laws 214, Ch. 16, 3, requires a joint technical education district (JTED) with a student count of more than 2, students to be funded at 95.5% of the state aid that would otherwise be provided by law and to reduce its budget limits accordingly. Therefore, the JTED's actual total equalization assistance may be less than the amount calculated on this Work Sheet. Estimated reduction to state aid. This estimated reduction amount must be used to reduce the GBL on page 7, line 9 and/or the UCBL on page 8, line A.IO. Rev. 5/14-FY :26AM Page 8 of 15

34 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTDNUMBER 7248 K. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 COMPUTING SMALL SCHOOL ADJUSTMENT PHASE DOWN LIMIT (A.R.S and ) This Work Sheet applies to any district that operated under the provisions of the small school adjustment (A.R.S A), and exceeded the allowable student counts for the first time before FY 2. Districts that operated under the provisions of a small school adjustment and exceeded the allowable student counts for the first time after FY 1999, should refer to Work Sheet K2. If in FY 215, the K-8 student count is greater than 125 but less than 154, or the 9-12 student count is greater than 1 but less than 176, the district may continue to adopt a budget using a small school adjustment on Budget, page 7, line 4 of up to 5, without an election. OR If the district holds an override election as provided in A.R.S , the district may include up to the amount calculated below on Budget, page 7, line 3(a). I. A district whose student count K-8 has exceeded 125 but is less than 154 may determine the small school adjustment phase down as follows: A. Phase down base 15,. B. FY 215 actual K-8 student count C. Small school student count limit D. Student count above the small school limit (I.B - I. C) E. Adjusted Support Level Weight (See Table A below to calculate) X F. Weighted student count above small school limit (I.D x I.E) G. Base Level Amount (from Work Sheet C, line VI.C) X H. Phase down reduction factor (I.F xi. G) I. Grades K-8 small school adjustment phase down limit (I.A- I. H) II. A unified or union high school district whose student count in grades 9-12 has exceeded 1 but is less than 176 may determine the small school adjustment phase down as follows: A. Phase down base B. FY 215 actual9-12 student count C. Small school student count limit D. Student count above the small school limit (II.B -II. C) E. Adjusted Support Level Weight (See Table B below to calculate) X F. Weighted student count above small school limit (II.D x II.E) G. Base Level Amount (from Work Sheet C, line VI.C) X H. Phase down reduction factor (line II.F x II.G) I. Grades 9-12 small school adjustment phase down limit (II.A- II.H) ,. -.. III. For unified districts that qualified for a phase down limit for K-8 or 9-12 but not both, enter 1% of the RCL attributable to the nonqualifying K-8 or 9-12 weighted student count as provided in A.R.S (B)(2)(a). IV. Allowable Small School Adjustment, subject to an election (I.I + II.I +III) V. 1% ofthe District's Total RCL VI. Maximum override, subject to an election (Greater of line IV or line V).. TABLE A: GRADES K-8 Student Count Constant SMALL ISOLATED 5. SMALL 5. FY 215 Student Count (line I.B above).. Difference.. Weight Adjustment Factor X.5 X.3 Support Level Weight Increase.. Support Level Weight FY 215 Adjusted Support Level Weight (Enter on line I.E above) TABLE B: GRADES9-12 Student Count Constant FY 215 Student Count (line II.B above).. Difference.. Weight Adjustment Factor X.5 X.4 Support Level Weight Increase.. Support Level Weight FY 215 Adjusted Support Level Weight (Enter on line I I.E above) Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 9 of 15

35 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY Maricopa CTDNUMBER 7248 K2. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 COMPUTING MAXIMUM SMALL SCHOOL ADJUSTMENT OVERRIDE (A.R.S and ) This Work Sheet applies to any district that operated under the provisions of a small school adjustment (A.R.S A) and exceeded the allowable student counts for the first time after FY Districts that operated under the provisions of the small school adjustment and exceeded the allowable student counts for the first time before FY 2, should refer to Work Sheet K. If in FY 215, the K-8 student count is greater than 125 but less than 181, or the 9-12 student count is greater than 1 but less than 185, the district may hold an override election as provided in A.R.S The maximum amount the district may budget on Budget, page 7, line 3(a), subject to an override election, is the amount calculated below. I. A district whose K-8 student count has exceeded 125, but is less than 181 may determine the maximum small school adjustment override as follows: A. FY 215 K-8 student count B. Small school student count limit 125. C. Student count above the small school limit (LA - I.B ). D. Phase-down factor X.45 E. Result (Line I.C x I.D). F. Maximum Percent Increase to apply to RCL (.35 - Line I.E). G:' K-8 Control Limit X H. K-8 small school budget override limit (I.F x I.G) (If less than zero, enter zero) II. A district whose 9-12 student count has exceeded 1, but is less than 185 may determine the maximum small school adjustment override as follows: A. FY student count B. Small school student count limit 1. C. Student count above the small school limit (II.A- II. B). D. Phase-down factor X E. Result (Line II.C x II.D). F. Maximum Percent Increase to apply to RCL (.65 -Line II.E). G Revenue go"t'ltt<?l x H small school budget override limit (II.F x II.G) (Ifless than zero, enter zero) o,;_,;_oo_ III. For unified districts that qualified for a phase down limit for K-8 or 9-12 but not both, enter 1% of the RCL attributable to the nonqualifying K-8 or 9-12 weighted student count as provided in A.R.S (B)(2)(a). IV. Allowable Small School Adjustment, subject to an election (I.H + II.H +III) V. 1% of the District's Total RCL VI. Maximum override, subject to an election (Greater of Line IV or Line V) Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 1 of15

36 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School Di~ COUNTY..:.M~ar=ic.;;Jopt;;.;;a;... CTD NUMBER 7248 L. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 IMP ACT AID FUND (ESEA, TITLE VIII) (A.R.S R) (For school districts that receive ESEA, Title VIII monies.) I. FY 215 Impact Aid revenue IT. Impact Aid revenue deposited in FY 215 to the Impact Aid Revenue Bond Debt Service Fund for principal and interest payments ill. A. TRCL!TSL Difference (from Work Sheet D, line VIIT.D -line V) 2,164,985 B. Impact Aid revenue transferred in FY 215 to the M&O Fund to provide cash for the TRCL!TSL difference calculated on line lli.a - -= ::; IV. Impact Aid revenue transferred in FY 215 to the M&O Fund to reduce or eliminate taxes - v. -= FY 214 Ending Cash Balance in the Impact Aid Fund +..::; VI. FY 215 Amount Available to be Spent in the Impact Aid Fund (line I -lines II through IV+ line V) (on Budget, page 6, line 16) = ~----~ Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 11 of 15

37 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified Schc COUNTY Maricopa CTD NUMBER ~ ~ M. WORK SHEET FOR CALCULATION OF THE FY 215 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (M&O) FUND BUDGET BALANCE CARRYFORWARD (A.R.S ) 1. a. General Budget Limit (GBL) (from FY 214latest revised Budget, page 7, line 1) bi Adjustments to the GBL from FY 214 BUDG75 c. Adjusted GBL 2. a. Budgeted M&O expenditures (from FY 214 latest revised Budget, page 1, line 3, Total Budget Year Column) b. Adjustments to the GBL (from line l.b) c. Adjusted Budgeted Expenditures 3. Lesser of the Adjusted GBL (line I.e) or the Adjusted Budgeted Expenditures (line 2.c) M&O actual expenditures 5. Budget Balance (line 3 minus line 4) (If negative, enter zero. The district does not have any budget balance to carry forward. Do not complete the remainder of this work sheet.) 147,93, ,93, ,93, ,93, ,93, ,26,235. 2,93,91. Note: For lines 6.a through 6.h deduct the FY 214 actual expenditures from the budget amount. If the result is negative, enter zero. FY 214 Unexpended Budget Acri!a.l 6. a. b. Special Program Override Desegregation 3,254,51. 7,186,17. 3,254,51. 7,186,17. c. d. e. Tuition Out Debt Service Dropout Prevention Programs Joint Career and Technical Ed. and Voc. Ed. Center. 221, ,13. g. Career Ladder Optional Performance Incentive Program 2,364,953. 2,315,923. h. Performance Pay. 1. Total Budget Balance Deductions [Add lines 6.a through 6.h.] 7. Budget Balance after Deductions (If negative, enter zero. The district does not have any budget balance to carry forward.) (line 5 minus line 6.i) Bmig~.<t , ,3. 2,854, a. FY 214 Adjusted District Limit (RCL) from page 4 of the most recent ADE report "Basic Calculations for Equalization Assistance" APOR 55-1, available on ADE's Web site Growth Adjustment (FY 214 BUDG75) c. Factorof4% 9. Maximum Allowable Budget Balance Carryforward [(line 8.a +line 8.b) x line 8.c] 1. Actual Allowable Budget Balance Carryforward (Enter the lesser ofline 7 or 9) 11. Enter the amount of Allowable Budget Balance Carryforward transferred to the School Opening Fund (not to exceed the lesser of line 1 or the FY 214 M&O Fund ending cash balance) 12. Remaining Actual Allowable Budget Balance Carryforward to be used in M&O Fund (line 1 -line 11) [to Budget, page 7, line 8(c)] 123,854,139. X.4 4,954, ,854,88. 2,854,88. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 12 of 15

38 RESIDENT DISTRICT Scottsdale Unified School District #48 CTD NUMBER WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 TUITION OUT FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (A.R.S L, J, and ) For Common School Districts NOT within a High School District (Type 3) Part!-Increase to GBL for Debt Service Tuition Outside the RCL fto Budl et. oaee 7 line 8 b)l A B c,, D Per Pupil Tuition in Attending Tuition Out Debt Service Debt Service Excess of Debt Increase to Attending District District High School Per Pupil Tuition Service Limit GBL Name CTDNumber Count,w Tuition (1) Limit (2) (B- C) (Ax D) Total HS Count:. 7. Total Increase to GBL for Debt Service Tuition Outside the RCL Tro Budget, page 7 line 8(b)]:. Part 11-Increase to DSL and RCL for Tuition (To Work Sheet E. lines II an d VI) E F Per Pupil Tuition Including Limited Debt M&O& Service Increase to Attending District UCO,Per (E +lesser ofb DSL andrcl Name Pupil Tuition or C) (Ax F) Total Increase to DSL and RCL for Tuition 13. (To Work Sheet E lines II and VI):. (1) Not to exceed 75 if the district pays tuition to other districts for 75 or fewer pupils. Not to exceed 8 if the district pays tuition to other districts for more than 75, but less than 1,1 pupils. To determine the allowable debt service amount, use the Total HS Count from line 6. (A.R.S ) For common school districts no longer within a high school district due to the unification of the high school district, enter the actual debt service tuition amount calculated pursuant to A.R.S J. (2) Enter 15 if the district pays tuition to other districts for 75 or fewer pupils. Enter 2 if the district pays tuition to other districts for more than 75, but less than 1,1 pupils. To determine the debt service limit, use the Total HS Count from line 6. (A.R.S ) For a common school district no longer within a high school district due to the unification of the high school district, enter the actual debt service tuition amount on this line. (A.R.S J) Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 13 of 15

39 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School Distric COUNTY _M_a_r_ic_o.._p_a CTD NUMBER 7248 R. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 STUDENT SUCCESS FUND (A.R.S , as amended by Laws 214, Ch.17, 5 and 17) Part I Achievement Profile Improvement Category (1) Student Success Funding Multiplier Eligible Scores Student Success Funding Amount Exceeds proficiency Superior improvement 24.5 x. Exceeds proficiency Strong improvement X. Exceeds proficiency Below-average improvement 7.75 X 6, = 53, Meets proficiency Meets proficiency Superior improvement Strong improvement X X Meets proficiency Below-average improvement 6. X 14, = 89,74.14 Approaches proficiency Superior improvement X 5. = 19,875. Approaches proficiency Strong improvement 2. X 2, = 51,42.6 Falls far below proficiency Superior improvement X. Falls far below proficiency Strong improvement 3.5 X 1,747.9 = 53,31.95 Total 267,156.9 Part II A. Prior year district attending ADM in tested grades (2) B. Per tested ADM amount (Part I, Total/Part II, line A) C. Prior year district attending ADM in untested grades (2) D. Total untested ADM amount (Part II, line B x line C) E. Number of high school graduates from the prior year 1,979. x 21.5 F. Amount to be allocated for the Student Success Fund (Sum of Part I, Total, and Part II, lines D and E) (on Budget, page 6, Other Funds, line 4) 13, , , , ,841.7 (1) Improvement Categories: "Superior improvement" means a measurement of academic gain within or equal to the top seventeen per cent for individual students that is used to calculate school and school district achievement profiles pursuant to section , subsection H, Arizona Revised Statutes. "Strong improvement" means an above-average measurement of academic gain for individual students that is used to calculate school and school district achievement profiles pursuant to section , subsection H, Arizona Revised Statutes, and that is below a determination of superior improvement. "Below-average improvement" means a below-average measurement of academic gain for individual students that is used to calculate school and school district achievement profiles pursuant to section , subsection H, Arizona Revised Statutes. Also, a student in a tested grade that does not receive a measurement of academic gain is considered to demonstrate below-average improvement. (2) Tested and Untested Grades "Tested grades" means grades three through eight and grade ten. "Untested grades" means kindergarten programs and grades one, two, nine and eleven. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 14 of 15

40 DISTRICT NAME Scottsdale Unified School District #48 COUNTY..:.;M..:.;a;;:n.:..; c;.;;o""p;;;;.a CTD NUMBER 7248 S. WORK SHEET FOR FY 215 EQUALIZATION ASSISTANCE FOR AN ACCOMMODATION SCHOOL (A.R.S ) PART I. CALCULATION OF EQUALIZATION ASSISTANCE A. Lesser offy 215 District Support Level or Revenue Control Limit (from Work Sheet J, line II.A). B. District Additional Assistance (from Work Sheet H, lines VII.E.3 and VII.F.3) ~'-- C. FY 215 Equalization Assistance Before Adjustments (Lines A+ B) D. FY 215 State Aid Decrease for Districts participating in Career Ladder Program (.375 x BSL from Work Sheet C, line XVII) (Laws 1992, Ch. 158, 2) (For FY 215 this amount is zero, unless otherwise notified by ADE) E. FY 215 Equalization Assistance (I.C- I.D) PART II. CASH BALANCE CARRYFORWARD Accommodation schools with a student count of 125 or less in grades K-8 or accommodation schools that offer instruction in grades 9-12 and have a student count of 1 or less in grades 9-12, complete Part I only ;;;,,;.,;',;.,;;_. A. 1. Maintenance and Operation (Fund 1) Cash Balance as of June 3, Budget Balance Carryforward (from Work Sheet M, line 12) 3. Remaining M&O Cash Balance (line A.l minus A.2) B. Maximum RCL Addition that may be Authorized by County School Superintendent : 1. The amount on line A.3 or. 2. 1% of the FY 215 RCL calculated on Work Sheet E, line VIII or Work Sheet F, line III..., Up to 5% of the FY 215 RCL calculated pursuant to A.R.S B + 4. Line B.2 plus B.3 =. lesser ofline B.l or B.4.;:.:..:;,;:;_. -..:::. Rev. 5/14-FY 215 5/2/214 9:26AM Page 15 of 15