A változások a as kohéziós politikai tervidőszakban kerekasztal-beszélgetéshez

Transcription

1 A változások a as kohéziós politikai tervidőszakban kerekasztal-beszélgetéshez Dr. Tétényi Tamás 54. Közgazdász vándorgyűlés, Kecskemét, szeptember 16.

2 Jó és rossz hírek New provisions

3 3 Thematic concentration ERDFconcentrates on strengthening research, technological development and innovation and the competitiveness of SMEs ICT 03 - SME 01 - R&D Low-carbon economy 07 - Transport Cohesion Fund mainly invests in TO4, TO6and TO Education Environment European Social Fundallocations distribute evenly in jointly financed programmes, mainly across TO Employment 09 - Social inclusion 11 - Public administration Climate change

4 4 Link to EU 2020 and CSRs PAs are strongly based on references to Europe 2020 and CSRs Programmes refer principally to national strategies. Figure: % of programming documents referring to 53,70% 38,30% 39,80% 22,40% 15,90% 21,10% Europe 2020 CSR Other strategies PA Programmes When selecting thematic objectives, in 40% of the cases MS did so with a reference to Europe 2020 headline targets and CSR.

5 5 Horizontal principles and policy objectives to be promoted Sustainability Equality Non-discrimination Accessibility PA% PRG% Climate Demography 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% (% of programme documents referring to each principle/ objective)

6 6 Territorial challenges in programming documents Each Member State has identified territories for integrated territorial approaches. Territorial challenges and needsare identified also by all of the Member States. Programmes with purely sectoral approach are rather rare. Matching territorial challenges with sectoral policies was a challenge to Member States, according to the survey.

7 7 Result-orientation ('Intervention logic') Results and specific objectives have been definedmostly in line with the regulations, rather consistently (with few methodological mistakes). OPsused a broad range(several hundred) of types of specific objectives, expected results, actions and selection principles. However, they used these types rather concentrated, as one quarter of them account for three quarters of the references. Actions and guiding principles of project selection, have been too broadly defined. As the survey shows,the dialogue with partners appears to have focused on the definition of actions. The transition from action-based programming to a result-based one seems to have proven difficult for Member States.

8 8 Quality assessment of the description in the programmes of the... main types of actions 2%... guiding principles of project selection 15% 32% 26% 10% 20% clear and precise too broad ambiguous 51% 44% none

9 9 Building of priority axes 29% of IGJpriority axes, but only 11% of ETCpriority axes, are combined axes. As regards combining thematic objectives, environment-related objectives are favourite targets of complex priorities. When the use of complex priority axes was considered Member States did not see territorial instrumentsas an alternative.

10 10 Thematic objectives contributed to in complex priorities 09 -Social inclusion 10% 08 - Employment 4% 07 - Transport 7% 10 - Education 5% 06 - Environment 27% 11 -Public administration 0% 05 -Climate change 7% 01 -Research and innovation 7% 02 -ICT 4% 04 -Low carbon economy 15% 03 -SMEs 13%

11 11 Impact of negotiations on MS negotiating positions AVERAGE EU 2020 Thematic objectives Results Flexibilities Financial instruments Cobmiantion axes Specific objectives Selection of actions Result indicators ITI CLLD SUD Transnational & ETC Poverty Co-ordination of Funds Co-ordination with EU policies Capacity Development Administrative Burden Horizontal priorities 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 1 EC accepted MS position Compromise MC changed position No disagreement

12 12 Thematic concentration Thematic concentration received more attention during programming, and was also more controversial than other new provisions. 70% of the references in the Operational and Co-operation Programmes concentrate in 30% of the investment priorities. A limited number ofmain resultsrelated to each thematic objective, and some additional ones unrelated to any of them (i.e. macro-economic and territorial results), have been identified in Partnership Agreements. Thematic objectives are not fully exclusive. Almost one third of R&I (TO1) main results could have been programme to TO2, TO3 and even TO4; Environmental, climate change and infrastructure-related main results (TO4 to TO7) partially overlap; The same applies to employment, inclusion and education results (TO8 to TO10).

13 13 Az ESIF célpiramisa

14 Dr. Tétényi Tamás u/en/the-use-of-newprovisions-during-theprogramming-phase-ofthe-european-structuraland-investment-fundspbkn /