SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
|
|
- Louise Phillips
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania January 2013
2 Table of Contents... 1 Introduction... 2 Project Need and Purpose... 2 Project Location... 3 Maps... 4 Project History Project Cost Estimate Implementation Plan/Cash Flow Updated Financial Plans Risk Identification and Mitigation Factors Cost and Revenue History Cost and Revenue Trends Revenue Shortfall Mitigation Summary of Significant Cost Reductions... 9 Value Engineering (VE) to Reduce Costs... 9 Other Cost Reduction Summary of Significant Cost Increases Summary of Major Responsibilities of Parties Involved References
3 Introduction PTC Southern Beltway The Southern Beltway, also known as S.R.0576 and PA Turnpike 576, is located in Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania. This Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (PTC) project was identified in PA Act 26 of 1991 which amended PA Act 61 of The Southern Beltway will provide needed transportation improvements between I-376 at the Pittsburgh International Airport (PIA) in Allegheny County and I-79 at the Allegheny/Washington County Line. The, because of its cost, complexity and level of federal participation, is a Major Project and warrants a Financial Plan as an aid to fiscal management of its implementation. An initial request and Financial Plan for this project was submitted on November 14, 2007 by the PTC when requesting the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) to include the in the 2007 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Twelve Year Program, and the 2035 Transportation and Development Plan. The SPC subsequently amended the 2035 Plan in 2008, and included the US-22 to I-79 Project as an illustrative project when the possibility of a Public Private Partnership was considered by the PTC. However, private funding for this project did not materialize. This SPC amendment contained an Financial Plan that identified a total cost of $659 million in year of expenditure dollars. On November 27, 2012, the PTC subsequently requested that the SPC amend the new TIP and 2040 Long Range Plan (LRP) and stated an updated Financial Plan, that identified new committed funding sources, would be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and SPC. This updated Financial Plan provides a revised financial strategy for moving this important project forward to completion. This document has been prepared in accordance with FHWA s latest Financial Plan guidance. This guidance indicates the major subject areas and information to be contained herein. Project Need and Purpose The Southern Beltway will support economic development in southwestern Pennsylvania and improve east-west mobility in the circumferential corridor south and west of the City of Pittsburgh. The US-22 to I-79 Project will provide safe, efficient transportation improvements in the corridor between US-22 and I-79, and ultimately improve access to the PIA from the south. It will be compatible with local, regional, and national planning efforts, and will improve access for employment, industry, truck traffic, emergency services, and future growth areas by providing a modern transportation facility that enhances transportation continuity locally and regionally. The project is expected to address the following transportation needs and deficiencies within the corridor: Poor circumferential mobility to adjacent job and planned growth areas Only two-lane roads are available for traveling in an east-west direction through the corridor Poor east-west mobility for auto, transit, and truck travel The transportation network is inadequate to serve economic development plans Safety concerns because of the deficient roadway network The purpose and major benefits of completing Southern Beltway from US-22 to I-79 are: Makes critical side road connections and improves travel times Relieves congestion while improving safety Increases potential for orderly economic development in Findlay and North/South Fayette Townships in Allegheny County and Robinson, Mount Pleasant, and Cecil Townships in Washington County Significantly improves access to the PIA for traffic travelling north on I-79 2
4 Project Location This 13-mile long is the second of three projects for the proposed Southern Beltway, a four-lane, limited access, tolled expressway. The entire Southern Beltway will run a total of approximately 31 miles, west to east, from I-376 at the Pittsburgh International Airport (PIA) to the existing Mon/Fayette Expressway (also known as PA Turnpike 43). It generally follows the Allegheny County/Washington County line. The first six-mile project of the Southern Beltway from PIA to US Route 22 was opened to traffic in October, The third 12-mile project will run from I-79 to the Mon/Fayette Expressway and intersect with PA Turnpike 43 just north of the existing S.R interchange (Exit 44). Due to financial constraints (no funding sources currently identified), there is no estimated completion date of the I-79 to Mon/Fayette Project. (Refer to Figure 1 below) Figure 1: Southern Beltway/Mon-Fayette Expressway Regional Network Map 3
5 This second Southern Beltway Project from US-22 to I-79 has progressed in cooperation with local townships, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and the FHWA. The PTC has identified funding sources for this project and anticipates construction and opening by the year Starting at the existing partial interchange (Exit 6) at US-22 for PA Turnpike 576, the PTC will complete all necessary ramps to extend the 4-lane expressway to the east. A new interchange (Exit 9) will be constructed to access S.R. 980 via Beech Hollow Road in Robinson Township, Washington County, then provide another interchange (Exit 11) with S.R. 980 and Noblestown Road near Mt. Pleasant Township, Washington County. The Beltway proceeds east to a new interchange (Exit 16) for S.R. 50 in South Fayette Township, Allegheny County. The Project ends with an interchange (Exit 18) to access Interstate 79 at the Allegheny/Washington County line, just south of the existing I-79 Safety Rest Area (See Figure 2). Project History Figure 2: Southern Beltway The PTC, in conjunction with PennDOT and FHWA has followed environmental and planning guidelines established under the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act, 1991 U.S. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act, TEA-21 of 1998, and SAFETEA-LU of Additionally, a USC Title 23, Section 129 agreement is in place with FHWA. A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) using 200 scale mapping was prepared and submitted by the PTC for the in September, On September 3, 2008, the FHWA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) that identified the Recommended Preferred B-2 Alternative as the Selected Alternative. The issuance of the ROD allowed the PTC to proceed with the final design of the project. 4
6 The PTC continued to advance the through pre-final design (using refined 50 scale mapping). In July 2009, Design Field View (DFV) Plans were prepared and submitted to PennDOT and FHWA and the FHWA approved the plans in January The PTC is now ready to proceed with final design and prepare final plans, specifications, estimates, and bid documents for construction. The PTC commenced purchasing right-of-way in 2010 and continues today; only properties that are totally affected by the Recommended Preferred B-2 Alternative alignment have been/are being purchased. 1. Project Cost Estimate The Southern Beltway US 22 to I-79 Project is considered a Major Project as costs exceed $500 million dollars. The total project cost estimate includes all costs required to complete the Post NEPA FEIS reevaluations, environmental mitigation, design costs, right-of-way, utilities relocations, public outreach, construction costs, management and inspection costs and contingencies. The estimated cost to complete the provided in the 2006 FEIS was $659 million in Year Of Expenditure (YOE) dollars. In August, 2006, the PTC asked Urban Engineers of Philadelphia, PA to independently validate the Project Cost Estimate. Urban s Cost Validation Report identified a range of costs for this urban interstate project from $578 million to $742 million with their independent YOE cost estimate at $640 million. The 2007 SPC amendment contained a PTC Financial Plan that identified a total cost of $659 million in YOE dollars. In January, 2008, the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) approved the US 22 to I-79 project for incorporation in the Long Range Plan and the Transportation Improvement program. The January, 2008 SPC amendment contained an initial financial plan reflecting a total cost of $659 million in year of expenditure dollars. At Design Field View (DFV), the cost was estimated at $669 million, in 2010 dollars. In January, 2010, when PennDOT and the FHWA approved the PTC s DFV plans, the project was estimated at $669 million, only 1.47% higher than the FEIS cost. These estimated costs included contingencies as recommended by PennDOT. In December, 2012, the PTC reviewed and refined the US-22 to I-79 cost estimate and concluded the project could be constructed at reduced cost of $632.5 million, in 2010 dollars. All costs have been calculated in accordance with industry standard estimation methods. Quantities were calculated from the approved line and grade or detailed design plans and provided by the section design teams. Unit costs were then developed based on a number of factors-statewide yearly average bids, local average bids, usage of a particular time, or a combination thereof using sound engineering judgment. The ongoing slow economy and significant reduction in highway construction activity in western Pennsylvania (resulting in extremely competitive material and bid prices in recent years) have all contributed to very low inflationary influence. Recent relative stability in oil/fuel prices has also muted inflationary impacts. PTC project experience indicates no inflation (and even actual construction unit prices deflation) since There is no way to know when this will change in the current uncertain economic environment. If it does change, the PTC will adapt the Financial Plan in future annual updates. 5
7 2. Implementation Plan/Cash Flow The Implementation plan for construction and Cash Flow for financing is provided in Figure 3 below. The construction and cash flow by year is shown over a 9 year period. Recent PTC construction project experience indicates virtually no inflation in recent years. The PTC anticipates that construction will be bid in 2013 and will begin in Completion of the Early Action Bridges over US Route 22 would be in Subsequent construction sections will be identified when final design commences in 2013 and will be constructed through Southern Beltway US-22 to I-79 Cash Flow Statement by Fiscal Year (in Millions) Note: PTC Fiscal Years Ending 5/31 Revenues Starting Res. Balance Escrow Proceeds Excess OFT Revenues TIFIA Proceeds OFT Bond Proceeds Revenue Subtotal Costs Project Costs Running Reserve Balance Total (9.886) (25.928) (30.668) (24.649) ( ) ( ) ( ) (93.374) (12.100) ( ) Figure 3: Implementation of Planned Construction and Cash Flow The PTC intends to apply for a Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Loan for this project. The TIFIA program provides Federal credit assistance to nationally or regionally significant surface transportation projects. The Federal TIFIA program is designed to fill market gaps and leverage substantial private co-investment by providing projects with supplemental funding. Under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21), the total amount of TIFIA credit assistance may not exceed 49 percent of eligible project costs. The PTC anticipates requesting just under 20% of eligible costs. The PTC is requesting that the SPC amend their Long Range Plan and Transportation Improvement Program to include the in order to qualify for a TIFIA Loan. The PTC will be responsible to repay the TIFIA Loan within 35 years after the project s substantial completion. 6
8 The relies equally on current available sources of revenue as on future financing. For project revenue, the PTC has cash on hand of approximately $158.9 million currently identified for the. An Oil Franchise Tax (OFT) Escrow Restructuring is expected to provide an additional $50 million in The PTC will also commit future annual OFT revenues received from the state from 2013 through 2021 totaling $124M. The federally-subsidized TIFIA Loan and PTC bonds will cover the remaining costs, which is less than half of the total project cost. To be conservative, the PTC plans to apply for a federally subsidized TIFIA Loan in 2013 and receive the loan in TIFIA loan requested is $ M. Future bond funding totaling $ M is not needed until fiscal year A bond is a debt investment issued by public transportation agencies to fund long term capital projects. They are essentially loan agreements between the PTC and investors. The PTC is obligated to pay specified amount(s) of money at specified future dates until the bonds(s) mature. The TIFIA Loan and PTC bonds are backed by proceeds from the PTC s portion of the current Oil Franchise Tax Revenue commonwealth allocation. The PTC s current funding streams are sufficient to support the TIFIA Loan and bond issue, and would only be enhanced by any state initiative to raise additional transportation funding through raising the cap of the OFT. In summary, Figure 3 shows that total revenue equals total costs by Updated Financial Plans The will be partially financed from revenues derived from the PTC s allocation of State Oil Franchise Tax Revenues. PTC will utilize a combination of its established Senior and Subordinated lien Oil Franchise Tax Revenue capital markets bonds, a TIFIA loan on parity with the Subordinated Bonds and Oil Franchise Tax Revenue pay-as-you go sources derived from existing fund balances, proceeds from an escrow restructuring and available cash flow. This Financial Plan will be updated annually and will be reviewed by the FHWA and reported to SPC. 4. Risk Identification and Mitigation Factors Based on the committed funding sources previously described, the following summarizes the potential risks and risk mitigation strategies: The PTC has submitted a letter of interest to FHWA asking to be invited to apply for a TIFIA Loan. If the PTC does not receive an invitation to apply, or if the PTC does not ultimately receive the entire amount of the $ M, the PTC must reassess, in subsequent annual Financial Plan updates, how to finance this project funding shortfall. Options might include re-scoping the size or construct it in phases or sub-stages. Act 26 of 1991 amended Act 61 of 1985 which mandates the PTC to study, design, and construct the Southern Beltway and provides State Oil Franchise Tax (OFT) revenue to the PTC for these projects. The actual amount of future Oil Franchise Tax revenues collected by the Commission depends upon a number of factors, including specifically the rate of consumption of motor fuels and the substitution of alternative energy sources for motor vehicles. If this revenue source is reduced, then the PTC must reassess, how to finance this funding shortfall. Options might be to re-scope the size or construct it in phases or sub-stages. Future annual Financial Plan updates will address this possibility and funding strategy. 7
9 The current slow economic conditions and observed reduction in highway construction activity in Western Pennsylvania have contributed to very low inflation. The PTC has not experienced any significant inflationary pressure on construction bid prices since The PTC expects very little inflation for the next several years. However, if higher inflation is realized in later years, PTC could adjust the level of the future/proposed bond issue. The PTC will adjust the Financial Plan annually as needed reflecting small changes by adjusting costs and revenues as appropriate. There may be future environmental permitting delays or changes in environmental regulations. Further, the existing Final Environmental Statement (FEIS), approved on September 3, 2008, will need to be re-evaluated. The PTC has been involved with such environmental risks and re-evaluations in the past. These have been mitigated and resolved by continued environmental regulatory agency coordination and by revisiting the environmental mitigation commitments. The PTC will continue close environmental coordination and monitoring in the future to minimize possible higher compliance costs. 5. Cost and Revenue History Actual cost expenditures have been running lower than estimated when compared with the Initial Project Financial Plan estimates on this project. The previous 12-months of final design activities and expenditures conservatively remain in line with the initial Financial Plan estimates and costs associated with design and construction, ROW acquisition, subsurface and environmental investigation activities. Further, subsequent cost estimates continue to be within the low and high range in the Cost Validation Study by Urban Engineers in August, Cost and Revenue Trends The PTC and the project team used a cautious and conservative approach to cost and revenue development and will continue in the future. The PTC has experienced virtually no inflationary pressure on construction bid prices since 2008 and expects low/no inflation for several years through To guard against the potential of spikes in the cost of construction materials due to geopolitical uncertainties, the project team will continue to annually monitor and adjust project cost estimates as necessary. During final design, but before preparation of various construction sections Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) and bid documents, FHWA will require a subsequent Cost Estimate Review (CER). Workshop and development of a Risk Assessment/Risk Registry (RA/RR) to determine risk factors that may affect the final cost estimate prior to bidding. The ultimate objective is to review and verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the total project cost estimate in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars, schedule, and to develop a 70% Level of Confidence Probability Curve for an updated cost estimate in final design. The PTC will incorporate all these items into subsequent annual Financial Plan updates. The CER/RA/RR Workshop is expected be a three-day event, facilitated by a CER Team from FHWA. Subject matter experts from PTC, PennDOT, Baker, the final design consultants and the future construction manager (yet to be selected) will probably participate in this workshop. Baker will also prepare a CER Report to document the CER Workshop. 8
10 7. Revenue Shortfall Mitigation PTC Southern Beltway As previously discussed, the PTC s current funding scenario relies on obligated Oil Franchise Tax revenues, supplemented with PTC funds based on the current cost estimate adjusted to the year of expenditure. This strategy will ease the concerns regarding statewide and regional obligation authority impacts, and will require endorsement of SPC on the FY TIP and 2035 LRP. The PTC will continue to coordinate with SPC, PennDOT and FHWA regarding future TIP updates and submit Financial Plan annual updates. 8. Summary of Significant Cost Reductions This chapter is reserved for a discussion of changes in individual project elements that reduced the cost of the project by at least $10 million. When current program element cost and composition is compared with that analyzed in the initial Financial Plan, there are no individual project elements which meet the criteria. Value Engineering (VE) to reduce costs As Design Manager for this project, Baker performed VE for each preliminary design section. These studies were completed at DFV and reviewed/approved by PennDOT/FHWA and implemented by the PTC. The intent of these efforts was to identify alternative means for meeting a design section s scope but at a reduced overall project cost. For the construction phase, VE clauses will also be included in each construction contract s specifications to encourage contractors to offer alternative, cost saving means for implementing the contract design. Other Cost Reductions Cost savings were realized by such means as reducing contingencies (based on historic percentages from past completed Southern Beltway and Mon-Fayette Expressway Projects), implementation of All Electronic Tolling (AET) methods, elimination of conventional toll booths/plazas, and to defer initial construction of a Maintenance Site. 9. Summary of Significant Cost Increases This chapter is reserved for a discussion of changes in individual project elements that increased the cost of the project by at least $10 million. When current program element cost and composition is compared with that analyzed in the Initial Financial Plan, there are no individual project elements which meet the criteria. 10. Summary of Major Responsibilities of Parties Involved FHWA, PennDOT, PTC, Baker and all final design consultants continue to work together as a proactive team to ensure that the best interest of the project, sponsoring agencies and motoring public are maintained at all times. A few of the tools that assist management throughout the design phase include monthly schedule updates, annual Financial Plan updates, right of way acquisition monitoring and mapping, quarterly scope and estimate documentation, and monthly project management meetings with stakeholders. 9
11 11. References Financial Plan Guidance, Federal Highway Administration, Jan 2007 Major Project Cost Estimating Guidance, Federal Highway Administration, Jan 2007 Cost Validation Study, Urban Engineers, Aug
The Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships
The Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships Mark Sullivan, Federal Highway Administration Innovative Transportation Finance Workshop Shoreview, Minnesota October 20,
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2013
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2013 June 1, 2012 Submitted to: Secretary of the Budget, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Submitted by: Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Prepared
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2017
Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2017 May 18, 2016 Submitted to: Secretary of the Budget, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Submitted by: Prepared by: The PFM Group Table of Contents I. Summary 1 II. Serving
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2014
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2014 May 31, 2013 Submitted to: Secretary of the Budget, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Submitted by: Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Prepared
More informationChapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions
Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions INTRODUCTION This chapter documents the assumptions that were used to develop unit costs and revenue estimates for the
More informationJoint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation
Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation Funding Overview February 21, 2013 H. Tasaico, PE 1 NCDOT Funding Overview - Agenda State Transportation Comparative Data Transportation Funding Sources
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike Commission Financial Overview
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Financial Overview November 13, 2012 Presented by : The PFM Group PFM is the Nation s Leading Financial Advisor and the Leader in Advising Toll and Transportation Agencies
More informationChapter 6: Financial Resources
Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2019
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2019 June 1, 2018 Submitted to: Secretary of the Budget, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Submitted by: Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Prepared
More informationCancelled. Final Action
RESOLUTION NO. R2018-16 Baseline Budget and Schedule for the Lynnwood Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Capital Committee Board PROPOSED ACTION 05/10/2018 05/24/2018 Cancelled
More informationTransportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Program Overview
Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Program Overview (general summary and overview only for full details, see 23 United States Code Section 601) TIFIA IS A CREDIT PROGRAM (not
More informationGLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.
Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding
More information8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents the financial analysis conducted for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) selected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) for the.
More informationPENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
November 20, 2015 Revised December 18, 2015 to reflect FAST Act PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE This is a collaborative product jointly developed by the Pennsylvania Planning
More informationSTUDY SCHEDULE STUDY PURPOSE
STUDY SCHEDULE This Open House is the last of three public meetings for the Route Centennial Bridge Study. The material presented previously at the second Open House in July 2015 focused upon Corridor
More informationDominion Boulevard Improvements with Toll System VDOT Initial Financial Plan February 1, 2012
VDOT February 1, 2012 Table of Contents Section 1 Summary.2 Project Description. 2 Project Background 2 Current Activities.3 Project Schedule.4 Section 2 Project Cost Estimate..4 Section 3 Project Financing..5
More informationDescription of the Submission / Conditions Precedent
Submittal Relating to the Development of the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 3A and 3B through a Facility Implementation Plan and Facility Agreement Description of the Submission / Conditions
More informationFinancial Forecasting Assumptions for Plan 2040 (DRAFT)
Financial Forecasting Assumptions for Plan 2040 (DRAFT) Inflation and Long Range Cost Escalation For the FY 2012 2017 TIP period, ARC will use the GDOT recommended 4 percent inflation rate. This conservative
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017
Fiscal Year 2018 VDOT Annual Budget June 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2018 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview.. 5 Revenues.. 7 Highway Maintenance
More informationLast year, transit spent almost $1.1 billion on materials and services contracts with more than 2,000 Pennsylvania businesses.
TRANSIT D+ 2006 Report Card for Pennsylvania s Infrastructure In recent years, transit use has increased faster than any other mode of transportation. More than one million Pennsylvanians use public transit
More informationUniversity Link LRT Extension
(November 2007) The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, commonly known as Sound Transit, is proposing to implement an extension of the Central Link light rail transit (LRT) Initial Segment
More informationI-64 Capacity Improvements Segment III Initial Financial Plan
I-64 Capacity Improvements Segment III Initial Financial Plan State Project # 0064-965-229/0064-099-229 P101, R201, C501, B638, B639, B640, B641, B642, B643, D609, D610, D611 Federal # NHPP-064-3(498)/
More informationTransportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA)
Slide 1 Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Reno Rail Corridor Port of Miami Tunnel SH 130 Jorianne Jernberg, Financial Analyst Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal
More informationAPPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans
APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans Overview This appendix documents the current Florida Department
More informationRoute 228 Corridor. Beaver and Butler Counties: Partnering to Impact the Region's Infrastructure
Enclosure 4 Route 228 Corridor Beaver and Butler Counties: Partnering to Impact the Region's Infrastructure This intersection safety and mobility improvement project will enhance travel on the vital Route
More informationEXHIBIT A GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACT (GEC) - TRAFFIC AND REVENUE SCOPE OF SERVICES
EXHIBIT A GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACT (GEC) - TRAFFIC AND REVENUE SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES General Engineering Contract - Traffic and Revenue FPN: TBD I. Purpose... A-1 II. Term
More informationCHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN
CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN This chapter of the 2014 RTP/SCS plan illustrates the transportation investments for the Stanislaus region. Funding for transportation improvements is limited and has generally
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike ----Public Ownership, Private
Pennsylvania Turnpike ----Public Ownership, Private Management: The best outcome for Pennsylvania www.penntransportation.com Introduction This presentation was prepared to address the potential lease of
More informationIn addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,
Strategic Initiatives for 2008-2009 ODOT Action to Answer the Challenges of Today In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities, the Strategic Initiatives set forth by
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NO. INDEPENDENT STATE AUDITOR S REPORT ON CERTAIN ACTIVITIES OF THE MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY'S CENTRAL ARTERY/THIRD HARBOR TUNNEL FORCE ACCOUNTS FEBRUARY 17, 1995 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2002 TABLE OF
More informationOctober 7, Introduction to the TIFIA Credit Program
October 7, 2015 Introduction to the TIFIA Credit Program Types of Credit Assistance 2 Secured (Direct) Loan Maximum term of 35 years from substantial completion Repayments must start 5 years after substantial
More informationRESOLUTION NO. R Baseline Budget and Schedule, and Approve Gates 5 and 6 for the East Link Extension
RESOLUTION NO. R2015-04 Baseline and Schedule, and Approve Gates 5 and 6 for the East Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Board 04/23/15 Final Action Ahmad Fazel, DECM Executive
More information1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) Board commissioned a Level 2 Traffic and Revenue study on the feasibility of collecting tolls to fund the proposed new SR156 connector
More informationFEBRUARY 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS
FEBRUARY 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS The Airports Authority established the Dulles Corridor Enterprise (DCE) Fund to segregate the financial activity associated with
More informationTransportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act
Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program Expansion Must Not Erode Taxpayer Protections October 27, 2011 The Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act 1 (TIFIA) was
More information2017 Educational Series FUNDING
2017 Educational Series FUNDING TXDOT FUNDING INTRODUCTION Transportation projects take many years to develop and construct. In addition to the design, engineering, public involvement, right-of-way acquisition,
More informationPennDOT Rapid Bridge Replacement Project
PennDOT Rapid Bridge Replacement Project Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference October 27 28,2015 Agenda Project Overview Project Development and Scoping Procurement Process Technical Requirements
More informationREQUEST FOR INFORMATION
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Regarding the Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements (From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County RFI Issuance Date: June 27, 2013 RFI Closing Date:
More informationTechnical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast
Technical Appendix FDOT 040 Revenue Forecast This page was left blank intentionally. APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE PLAN 040 Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan
More informationNORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017
More informationALL Counties. ALL Districts
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation
More informationI-66 RFI Response Vinci Concessions USA 25 November 2013
General: 1. Please describe your firm, its experience in relation to public-private partnership projects, and its potential interest in relation to the Project (e.g., design/engineering firm, construction
More informationINVESTING STRATEGICALLY
11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program
More informationForecasting Traffic and Revenue Traditional and Express Lane Tolling
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Forecasting Traffic and Revenue Traditional and Express Lane Tolling Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti Executive Director, Florida s Turnpike Enterprise GARCON POINT BRIDGE
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011
Fiscal Year 2011-2012 VDOT Annual Budget June 2011 For Further Information Contact: Virginia Department of Transportation Financial Planning Division 1221 E. Broad Street, 4th Floor Richmond, VA 23219
More informationFUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS
Minnesota Transportation Advisory Committee FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management American Association of State
More information23 USC 601. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 23 - HIGHWAYS CHAPTER 6 - INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE 601. Generally applicable provisions (a) Definitions. In this chapter, the following definitions apply: (1) Eligible project costs. The term eligible
More informationThis chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).
8 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). The alternative formerly known as
More informationDulles Corridor Enterprise Financial Update Dulles Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting
Dulles Corridor Enterprise Financial Update Dulles Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting May 30, 2014 Discussion Outline Finance Plan for the Metrorail Project Allocation of Estimated Capital Costs and TIFIA
More informationTier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Chesapeake Bay Crossing Study, Anne
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/11/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-21916, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal
More informationMAJOR BUSINESS TERMS FOR THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DBFOM DELIVERY METHOD
October 1, 2015 MAJOR BUSINESS TERMS FOR THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DBFOM DELIVERY METHOD This Term Sheet ( Term Sheet ) provides a summary of major business terms to be
More informationSolutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co. April 22, 2008
MUNIROOT\V_NY\MuniVol0\Shared\Zach\PPP\Greg Carey's Speech for Texas Transportation Forum v4.10.08.doc effroz 11 Apr 2008 16:46 1/13 Solutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co.
More informationINVESTMENT STRATEGIES
3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This
More informationPAYING OUR WAY: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSPORTATION FINANCE
NATIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING COMMISSION PAYING OUR WAY: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSPORTATION FINANCE Final Report Briefing Presented by: Dr. Adrian Moore, Commissioner Vice President,
More information2045 Long Range Transportation
The Jackson Area Comprehensive Transportation Study 2045 Long Range Transportation June 2018 Jackson Area Comprehensive Transportation Study 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Jackson County, Michigan
More informationPENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION HIGHSPIRE, PENNSYLVANIA FORMAL TELEPHONE MEETING OCTOBER 7, :00 AM AGENDA
PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION HIGHSPIRE, PENNSYLVANIA FORMAL TELEPHONE MEETING OCTOBER 7, 2014 10:00 AM AGENDA A. Roll Call Sunshine Announcement Public Participation B. Minutes-September 16, 2014 C.
More informationJoint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation. North Carolina Turnpike Authority Beau Memory March 14, 2017
Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation North Carolina Turnpike Authority Beau Memory March 14, 2017 Benefits of Tolling: Funding source Supplements traditional transportation funding Can accelerate
More informationWorking with Proportionate Fair-Share
Working with Proportionate Fair-Share December 2006 Presented by the Florida Department of Transportation Working with Proportionate Fair-Share Volume 1, December 2006 Presented by the Florida Department
More informationTechnical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group
Technical Memorandum Finance Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group April 25, 2013 i Table of Contents 1. Ohio Finance... 1 1.1 Baseline Projection -- Highways...
More informationDevelopment of the Cost Feasible Plan
March 15, 2012 TPO Board and Advisory Committee Meetings Development of the Cost Feasible Plan Transportation Outlook 2035 LRTP Update Atkins Development of the Cost Feasible Plan P a g e 1 Development
More informationWorking with Proportionate Fair-Share
Working with Proportionate Fair-Share Final Volume 1, December 2006 Presented by the Florida Department of Transportation Table of Contents MPO RSI Metropolitan Planning Organization Roadway Segment Improvement
More informationFlorida s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2018/19 thru FY 2022/23 Summary of Projects FDOT District Six
DISTRICT SIX PROJECT OVERVIE Florida s Turnpike Enterprise continues to make project investments in District Six. In FY 2017 and FY 2018, current Turnpike projects total over $109 million within Miami-Dade
More informationApril 25, Martin Klepper Executive Director
April 25, 2017 Martin Klepper Executive Director A New Formula for Infrastructure Investment The BUILD AMERICA BUREAU 2 Bureau Credit Programs Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA)
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2018
Fiscal Year 2019 VDOT Annual Budget June 2018 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2019 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview. 5 Revenues. 7 Highway Maintenance
More informationCHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY
The financial analysis of the recommended transportation improvements in the 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (RTP or the Plan ) focuses on four components: Systems
More informationPennsylvania Turnpike Commission
Public Finance Toll Roads, Bridges & Tunnels Rating Report Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Revenue Bonds Series A-1 of 2017 Revenue Refunding Bonds Series A-2 of 2017 Analytical Contacts: Andrew Clarke,
More informationTransportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper
Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper Pierce County Public Works- Office of the County Engineer Division Introduction This paper will document the process used by the
More informationDATA COLLECTION. March 15, 2013
8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75231 tel: 214 346 2800 fax: 214 987 2017 Mr. Scott Phinney, P.E. Office of Statewide Planning & Research The Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 W. Broad
More informationTEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRYAN DISTRICT T I P
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S T A T E W I D E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M S T I P 2 015201 8 BRYAN DISTRICT 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 T I P H I G H W AY I n i t i a l 2015
More information77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2800 CHAPTER... AN ACT
77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2013 Regular Session Enrolled House Bill 2800 Sponsored by Representatives READ, BENTZ, Senators BEYER, STARR CHAPTER... AN ACT Relating to the Interstate 5 bridge replacement
More informationSOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M D Street-to-M Street Track & Signal Project Preferred Alternative
SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-126 D Street-to-M Street Track & Signal Project Preferred Alternative Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Board 12/13/07 Discussion/Possible
More informationRIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning
RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning Land & Water Conservation Summit March 10, 2012 Statewide Planning Framework Department of Administration Statewide Planning Program State Planning
More information8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Chapter 8 Financial Analysis 8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents a summary of the financial analysis for the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, a description of the Project Sponsor
More informationFHWA Risk Based Cost Estimate Reviews
FHWA Risk Based Cost Estimate Reviews 2010 Capacity Building Workshop Minneapolis, MN FHWA-Resource Center Construction & Project Management Team Craig M. Actis PE August 11-13, 2010 Overview Slide 2 FHWA
More informationAppendix D: USING TOLL REVENUE TO FINANCE HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Appendix D: USING TOLL REVENUE TO FINANCE HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WHITE PAPER Prepared by Econsult Corporation September 2011 Michael Baker Jr., Inc. in association with Boles, Smyth Associates,
More informationI-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan October 2018 Public Meetings I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan Overview of I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan purpose Summary of public feedback Prioritization of potential improvements
More informationSEPTEMBER 2018 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS
SEPTEMBER 2018 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS The Airports Authority established the Dulles Corridor Enterprise (DCE) Fund to segregate the financial activity associated with
More informationN A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A
2009 NATIONAL SCAN: RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS 2009 National Scan Results: Rural Transportation Planning Organizations Since the passage of ISTEA, an increasing number of states have turned
More informationDepartment of the Auditor General. Highlights
Department of the Auditor General The Pennsylvania Turnpike s financial obligation under Act 44 is unsustainable, causing the deterioration of the financial condition of the Turnpike, while placing an
More informationVirginia Department of Transportation. Midtown Tunnel Project. Updated Finance Plan Supplement. February 2013
Virginia Department of Transportation Midtown Tunnel Project Updated Finance Plan Supplement February 2013 1. Project Overview The Downtown Tunnel/Midtown Tunnel/MLK Extension Project located in the cities
More informationPA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY
POLICY POLICY SUBJECT: PA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY This is a statement of official Pennsylvania Turnpike Policy RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: NUMBER: 7.03 APPROVAL DATE: 04-20-2004 EFFECTIVE DATE: 05-05-2004
More informationGNC SWOT Analysis: Action Plan. Prepared by the Olsson Associates Team. Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation.
GNC SWOT Analysis: Action Plan Prepared by the Olsson Associates Team Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation December 2014 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 7 (Action Plan)
More informationTEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE Presentation for Texas Transportation Commission March 28, 2018 Purposes of the Workshop The Texas Transportation
More informationPrioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016
Prioritization and Programming Process NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016 Today s Roadmap 1. Planning and Programming Division Overview 2. Strategic Investments (STI) Law 3. Prioritization
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISION 19 F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S Expedited Administrative Modifications
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 REVISION 19 Expedited Administrative Modifications TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018
More informationJANUARY 2017 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS
JANUARY 2017 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS The Airports Authority established the Dulles Corridor Enterprise (DCE) Fund to segregate the financial activity associated with
More informationTechnical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs
Technical Report No. 4 Revenue and Costs Technical Report No. 4 REVENUE AND COSTS PASCO COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 8731 Citizens Drive New Port Richey, FL 34654 Ph (727) 847-8140, fax (727)
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Modifications
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for 2015-2018 STIP and TIP Modifications Purpose This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishes a set of
More informationTransportation Primer
Transportation Primer Joint Appropriations Committee on Transportation February 11, 2015 Amna Cameron Fiscal Research Division Agenda Background Transportation Revenues Items for Consideration Transportation
More informationFinancial Snapshot October 2014
Financial Snapshot October 2014 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding MoDOT s finances. This document provides
More informationMeeting Minutes for January 19, 2017 Transportation Technical Committee SPC Offices Two Chatham Center, Pittsburgh PA 15219
Attendees: Meeting Minutes for January 19, 2017 Transportation Technical Committee SPC Offices Two Chatham Center, Pittsburgh PA 15219 Ann Ogoreuc, Allegheny County Department of Economic Development Stephen
More informationDanny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Danny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Grant County Democrats Monday, April 11, 2016 Facts and Figures AHTD Quick Facts 3rd Largest State Agency
More informationBINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016
BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016 The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study Policy Committee is designated by the Governor of New York as the Metropolitan
More informationTable of Contents. Study Overview. Corridor Needs Analysis. Financial Strategies. Legislative Review
Table of Contents Study Overview Corridor Needs Analysis Climbing Lanes Additional Lane I-25/I-80 Cost Estimate ITS Truck Parking Financial Strategies Legislative Review 02 Study Overview The overall goal
More informationCity Services Appendix
Technical vices 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 The Capital Facilities Plan... 1 1.2 Utilities Plan... 2 1.3 Key Principles Guiding Bremerton s Capital Investments... 3 1.4 Capital Facilities and Utilities Addressed
More informationFinance and investment in transport infrastructure: Case study of the United States & lessons for Ghana
Finance and investment in transport infrastructure: Case study of the United States & lessons for Ghana Cornelius Nuworsoo Professor of Transportation Planning California Polytechnic State University San
More informationFEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines
More informationTESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing
TESTIMONY The Texas Transportation Challenge Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing Ric Williamson Chairman Texas Transportation Commission April 19, 2006 Texas Department of
More informationAmarillo Metropolitan Transportation Plan October 18, 2007 Revision Use Of Year-Of-Expenditure Cost Estimates
2005-30 Amarillo Metropolitan Transportation Plan October 18, 2007 Revision Use Of Year-Of-Expenditure Cost Estimates The Federal Transportation bill, the Safe Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
More informationPENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION HIGHSPIRE, PENNSYLVANIA FORMAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, :00 A.M. A G E N D A
PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION HIGHSPIRE, PENNSYLVANIA FORMAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 10:00 A.M. A G E N D A A. Roll Call Sunshine Announcement Public Participation B. Minutes-September 2, 2014 C.
More information