TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JULY 30, 2012 MINUTES
|
|
- Darcy Kelly
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JULY 30, 2012 MINUTES Present: Bryson, Staff: Mason Smith, Chair, Charlie Moore, Sy Rosenthal, Jon Chalfie, Ben Don Gwinnup, Saila Milja-Smyly. Michael Robertson, Kent Prause, David Pagliarini, Lynnette Lynes Mr. Smith called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. and reviewed the procedures with the public on the various requests before the Board. A. Approval of Minutes Mr. Chalfie moved for approval of the minutes. Mr. Rosenthal seconded the motion. All in favor. B. Approval of Agenda Mr. Bryson moved to approve the agenda. Ms. Milja-Smyly seconded the motion. All in favor. C. Correspondence Mr. Smith administered the oath to those speaking. D. New Business 1. Case A-3-12, 0 Long Grove Drive, TMS ; Request for Rehearing Ms. Milja-Smyly stated that a conflict of interest has arisen since last heard and recused herself. Mr. Moore moved to convene to executive session at 6:13 p.m. to discuss legal matters. Mr. Rosenthal seconded the motion. All in favor. The Committee reconvened at 6:36 p.m. No action was taken while in executive session. Mr. Gwinnup moved to be permitted to participate in the rehearing process. Mr. Rosenthal seconded the motion. Motion failed on a 1 to 5 vote with Mr. Gwinnup in favor and Ms. Milja-Smyly abstaining. Mr. Robertson stated that Mr. Gwinnup would not participate in the rehearing as he was not present at the original hearing. He stated that on the advice of legal counsel, those not present at the original hearing would be able to participate in the rehearing proceedings. Mr. Robertson reviewed the staff comments as follows: Case A-3-12, 0 Long Grove Drive, was an appeal of the decision of the Zoning Administrator authorizing extensive amenities in the P-2 area of Seaside Farms which was heard by the Board on April 30, 2012.
2 Page 2 of 11 Present at the meeting were: Dr. Mason Smith, Ms. Saila Milja-Smyly, Mr. Jonathon Chalfie, Mr. Charles Moore, Mr. Seymour Rosenthal, and Mr. Ben Bryson The Board voted 4-2 to uphold the decision of the Zoning Administrator with Ms. Milja-Smyly and Mr. Rosenthal opposed. The adopted Bylaws at its regularly scheduled meeting on March 26, Section 9 of the Bylaws establishes standards for requesting a rehearing. Section 9 states The Board may grant a rehearing of an application which has been dismissed or denied upon written request filed with the secretary within fifteen (15) days after delivery of the order accompanied by new evidence which could not reasonably have been presented at the hearing, or evidence of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact affecting the outcome. The order of the April 30, 2012, decision in Case A-3-12 was sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested on May 22, 2012, and signed and received by Ms. Catherine McGinn on May 23, A request for rehearing was submitted by Ms. Catherine McGinn, Seaside Farms Single Family Homeowners Association Board of Directors, and received by the Secretary on June 6, Ms. McGinn s request for rehearing and the evidence proffered to support her position have been provided to the. The decision before the Board is whether or not the evidence supports the request to grant a rehearing. In making a determination, the Board should cite specific findings of fact and conclusions of law as with any other decision. If the Board determines that a rehearing is warranted, a specific date for the rehearing should be established. For instance, at the next regularly scheduled meeting (August 27, 2012). Mr. Prause clarified that of the Land Development Regualtions noted in Ms. McGinn s exhibit, page 38, the statute was amended in July 2002 and that there was a previous error in the code of ordinances and corrected in He agreed that the rehearing procedures should be adhered to. He noted that his opinion is that no new evidence has been submitted. Ms. Cathy McGinn, made a point of order that the rehearing procedures were not clearly outlined ahead of time, that the conflict of interest should be specifically stated, and that the voting procedures for those not in attendance at the original hearing should be adhered to as outlined in the bylaws. She reviewed her reason for requesting the rehearing with the Board. She called into question the validity of the final plat as it was not approved by the Planning Commission and a public hearing was not held. She concluded that contrary to Mr. Walker s statement, there was a requirement to have the property remain as a park. She asked that the rehearing be granted. Mr. Rosenthal asked if the matter would be appealed to the Circuit Court. Ms. McGinn answered in the affirmative, and stated that if granted a rehearing and the
3 Page 3 of 11 rehearing was in the applicant s favor, the appeal to the Circuit Court would be withdrawn. Mr. Rosenthal suggested that it would go to Circuit Court regardless of whether a rehearing was held or not. He asked if the rehearing would essentially be a moot point. Ms. McGinn answered in the negative and stated that the courts look to see if all legislative options have been exhausted. She stated that the appeal went forward due to time constraints. Mr. Chalfie asked what facts would be considered new evidence that could not be presented at the hearing. Ms. McGinn answered that the search of the preliminary and final plat public hearings were held and the information was not provided and should have been provided by planning staff. She stated that the recording of the development agreement refers to the original code that it would be approved by the Planning Commission, which they did not. Mr. Prause stated that the portion of the development agreement that Ms. McGinn refers to was put in place in This was amended by a subsequent ordinance, #97001 and was in effect at the time the development agreement was established and in effect and is the controlling feature. He stated that there was an oversight in being amended along with and was subsequently corrected in He stated that the Planning Director or its designee has approval authority. He stated that the preliminary plat does not require a public hearing, but they are noticed and can be appealed if anyone is aggrieved. Ms. McGinn noted that the development agreement is the controlling document and in exhibit 10.2 it shows the controlling document. Mr. Morre asked what a mutual misstatemen of fact would be. Mr. Pagliarini answered that it would be a fact that the Board relied upon as well as the applicant and that all parties relied on that was incorrect. Mr. Moore asked if a rehearing was warranted, the Board would have to rely on new evidence that could not be presented at the time of a clerical error. He suggested that there is not any evidence that could not have been presented at the previous hearing. Mr. Rosenthal disagreed and suggested that there were enough clerical errors, and misinformation that justifies a rehearing. He stated that a legal review was never done and this was his initial concern during the hearing. Mr. Rosenthal moved to approve the request based on the fact of Ms. McGinn s comments and included in her letter requesting the rehearing and that there was sufficient misinformation and clerical errors to warrant a rehearing. Mr. Chalfie seconded the motion. Mr. Moore suggested that there was no slight of hand or misrepresentation and that the information was available for the original hearing. He suggested that there were no clerical errors that would affect the outcome and there was no mutual misstatement of fact. He suggested that this is already appealed to the Circuit Court and there is no substantiation for a rehearing. Mr. Chalfie suggested that the motion should be clarified that this is to vote on
4 Page 4 of 11 whether to grant a rehearing. Mr. Rosenthal suggested that the statements in Ms. McGinn s letter was very cogent and clear. He suggested that regardless of the outcome of this motion, the appeal still stands in Circuit Court. Mr. Smith called for a vote on the motion. Motion failed on a 1 to 4 vote with Mr. Rosenthal in favor, and Mr. Gwinnup and Ms. Milja-Smyly abstaining. 2. Case S Lowcountry Blvd., TMS ; Request for a special exception for a proposed 170 ft. monopole-style wireless communications facility designed for use by five (5) telecommunications carriers. Mr. Robertson reviewed staff comments as follows: The property is zoned AB-2; Areawide Business-2 The proposed tower will be located on property owned by Mr. Bradford P. Law which currently is used as an automotive repair facility. The applicant wishes to construct a 170 tall monopole for use by up to five telecommunication carriers. Section Special Exceptions states Telecommunications towers in the AB, Areawide Business District, and AB-2, Areawide Business-2 District are allowed as special exception, subject to the provisions of (A)(3) and the following provisions: (1) The applicant must meet the requirements of above. See below (2) Monopole or stealth application are preferred over lattice towers. The applicant has proposed a monopole application. (C) In addition to satisfying the approval criteria listed herein, the must find that the design, location and height of the proposed tower will not substantially impact the aesthetic and residential character of adjoining areas zoned residential, and intended to remain such pursuant to adopted land use plans. The applicant has provided photo simulations from nearby residential areas to illustrate the view of the tower in Exhibit Conditional Use states: (A) The applicant must provide written verification that no feasible alternative exists to the construction of a new tower, such as collocation on an existing tower or structure. Written justification is provided by Mr. Keith Powell, Optima Towers, in Exhibit 5 of the applicant s submittal. (B) The tower owner must provide written agreement acknowledging that additional providers may collocate on the new tower at the prevailing market rate, subject to the engineering capabilities of the structure. Written justification is provided by Mr. Keith Powell, Optima Towers, in Exhibit 6 of the applicant s submittal. (C) The minimum setback from the center of the tower to an adjacent residentially is equal to the height of the tower, measured to the
5 Page 5 of 11 nearest property line. The applicant indicates, and staff has verified, that the tower is not within 170 of any residentially zoned properties in the cover letter of the submittal. (D) The minimum setback from the center of the tower to all other adjacent nonresidentially zoned property or street right-of-way is determined by the fall zone, such that in the event of failure the fall zone shall prevent the tower from encroaching onto adjoining properties of street rights-of-way. The applicant has indicated the fall zone in Exhibit 1 of the application. (E) In all cases the fall zone must remain inside the lot lines of the property on which the tower is located. The applicant has indicated on page 2 of the cover letter that the tower s fall zone is within the lot lines of the property. Further, a Fall Zone letter of S.C. Professional Engineer Michael F. Plahovinsak has been provided in Exhibit 2 of the application Additional Provisions states: (A) Location, collocation and construction of new towers require the issuance of a building permit demonstrating adherence to all applicable building code requirements, including wind load and seismic requirements. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 3 of the cover letter. (B) Towers no longer used for communication purposes must be dismantled and removed within 120 days of the date they are taken out of service. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 3 of the cover letter. (C) No advertising signage may be placed on any tower. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 3 of the cover letter. (D) Illumination is only allowed in accordance with the requirements of the FCC, FAA or other appropriate regulatory agencies. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 3 of the cover letter. (E) It is preferred that the color of the tower blend with its surroundings Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 3 of the cover letter. (F) The tower and associated structures are appropriately secured by means of walls, fences (other than chain link material) or other devices, and are appropriately screened using existing new evergreens shrubs and trees that will reach a minimum height of six feet. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 4 of the cover letter. (G) The use of COWs and CALFs are allowed in any zoning district as follows: o With a special event permit pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 116 for special events. o For a period not to exceed 120 days following a natural disaster or local emergency declared by a competent official authority. o On location by broadcast media on a short-term basis covering an event or story for the same duration. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 4 of the
6 Page 6 of 11 cover letter. (H) Application requirements: o Copy of lease or letter of authorization from the property owner authorizing application. Authorization by the property owner, Bradford P. Law, is provided in Exhibit 3. (2) Written description and scaled drawings, in plan and elevation view, of the proposed tower structure, antennas, ground structure, landscape or bufferyard plantings and fence plan. The applicant has stated the information is provided in Exhibit 1 of the submittal. (3) Graphic representation of the tower s fall zone and certification letter from a State of South Carolina-licensed, professional engineer, bearing original signature and seal. The applicant has indicated that the fall zone can be found on Sheet Z02 of Exhibit 1 and the certification letter in Exhibit 2. (4) Line-of-sight diagram or photo simulation, showing the proposed tower against the skyline, and viewed from at least four different directions from within the surrounding area. The applicant has indicated that these items are included in Exhibit 4 of the submittal. (5) Written justification why location on an existing building or structure or collocation on an existing tower without extension is not feasible, to include: Such technical information an dother justifications as are necessary to document why location or collocation is not viable. A list of all existing structures considered as alternatives to the proposed location, and an explanation of why the alternatives were unacceptable due to technical, physical, or financial reasons. The applicant has provided a written justification in Exhibit 5 of the submittal application. (6) A written agreement acknowledging that additional providers may collocate on the new tower at the prevailing market rate, subject to the engineering capabilities of the structure. The applicant has provided written acknowledgement in Exhibit 6 of the application submittal Powers; Variances; Special Exceptions; Stays; Hearings, Decisions and Orders (A)(3) states To permit uses by special exception, subject to such uses being so designated in the use district regulations of this chapter, and to the following specific terms and conditions: (a) Adequate provision is made for such items as setbacks, fences, and buffered or planting strips to protect adjacent properties from the possible adverse influence of the proposed use, such as noise, vibration, dust, glare, odor, traffic congestion, and similar factors. Ple ase see the applicant s response to this item on page 5 of the cover letter. Staff would note that the project will be subject to Commercial Design Review for site and landscape. A simple wooden stockade fence is shown. Design Review generally requires a wood fence with
7 Page 7 of 11 brick column supports as was the case with previous cell tower extension approvals and should be incorporated in this instance as well. (b) Vehicular traffic and pedestrian movement on adjacent roads shall not be hindered or endangered. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 6 of the cover letter. The structure should have no adverse impact on vehicular or pedestrian traffic as proposed. (c) Off-street parking and loading areas and the entrance, and exits of these areas, shall be adequate in terms of location, amount, design, and construction to serve the proposed use. Please see the applicant s response to this item on page 6 of the cover letter. (d) The proposed use shall be compatible with existing uses to the extent that such use will not adversely affect the level of property values, general character or general welfare of the nearby area. Plea se see the applicant s response to this item on page 6 of the cover letter. (e) In approving a special exception, the Board may attach to it such reasonable terms and conditions as it may consider necessary to accomplish the intent of this section and this entire zoning chapter. Mr. Robertson stated that the staff comments mirror the applicant s response and suggested that in order to save time, they not be read for the record. He noted that the facility would have to go through the DRB process and a fence with brick columns and wood infill would be required. Ms. Milja-Smyly suggested that some of the public might not have had an opportunity to review the staff comments and suggested that they be read for the record. Mr. Smith asked that the staff comments be read. Mr. Robertson read staff comments for the record. Mr. Rosenthal asked for clarification of which section pertains to the special exception. Mr. Robertson answered that this was a clerical error and should be not Mr. Jonathan Yates and Mr. Keith Powell, and Brad Law (owner), reviewed the request with the Board. Mr. Powell reviewed the photos of where the tower would be located and views of tower with the Board. Mr. Yates stated that they would adhere to the DRB approval guidelines in regard to the fence. He stated that there would be additional landscaping installed on this site. Mr. Fred Drulard, 290 Isaw Drive, stated that the cell phone coverage is not where it should be and that a well-placed tower that would not be obtrusive should be approved.
8 Page 8 of 11 Mr. Smith closed the public hearing. Mr. Moore asked if there was adequate public notice on this application. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative and stated that 15 days notice is required and the property must be posted as well. In addition, he stated that the agenda is posted on the website. Mr. Moore asked how a 170 foot tower falls on a 30 foot radius. Mr. Yates answered that the top 30 feet collapses on itself. Mr. Chalfie asked if this was the exterior elevation of the fence and that it would be less aesthetically pleasing and should be located on the interior. Ms. Milja-Smyly asked about the future co-locations and if the requirements would be acceptable for staff. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative. Ms. Milja-Smyly asked how many future carriers would be. Mr. Yates answered in the negative and stated that there is room for a total of five carriers. Mr. Rosenthal agreed that it appears to be the best location for a tower. Mr. Gwinnup asked if there is a vacant tower across from this location on Johnnie Dodds. Mr. Powell answered that he is not aware of any. Mr. Yates stated that if vacant it is required to be removed. Mr. Rosenthal moved for approval as the request meets all of the criteria outlined in Mr. Moore seconded the motion. All in favor. The Board convened for a short break at 7:47 p.m. and reconvened at 7:51 p.m. 3. Case V-3-12, 1740 West Canning St., TMS ; Request for a variance from the strict interpretation of (C)(2) to allow the removal of a 26 oak tree. Mr. Robertson reviewed staff comments as follows: Please see applicant s submittal for justification of the relief sought. The property is Zoned PD through the Dunes West/Park West Planned Development and R-3 within the PD. The applicant requests to remove a 26 oak from the property. Section (C)(2) states Removal of historic tree(s) on lots approved and recorded after April 1, 2000, shall require a variance from the Powers; Variances; Special Exceptions; Stays; Hearings, Decisions and Orders (2) states [the Board has the following powers] To hear and decide appeals for variance from the requirements of the zoning ordinance when strict application of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance may be granted in an individual case of unnecessary hardship, if the Board makes and explains, in writing the following findings: (a) There are extraordinary and exceptional circumstances pertaining to the particular piece of property; The property and its circumstances are similar to those of another recent decision by the Board of Zoning
9 Page 9 of 11 Appeals, Case V-1-12 where a tree was located in the buildable area of the lot and Case V-2-11 which was a request to remove an historic tree in order to construct a garage. (b) These conditions do not generally apply to other properties in the vicinity. The applicant did not address this item on the application. This condition is fairly common throughout the Town as seen in previous approvals and within the neighborhood as demonstrated by photographs showing neighboring properties. Further, the house plan shown is not in keeping with the adjacent homes. The adjacent homes do not generally have garages in front of the house. The homes with garages are accessed from the rear or side of the house. (c) Because of these conditions, the application of the ordinance to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property; The BOZA noted in the V-2-12 discussion that the utilization of the property is for a residential structure which could be located on the property and that a garage was not necessarily a requirement for a house but an accessory structure and therefore, not an unreasonable restriction. Further, the application notes that the neighborhood ARB requires side loaded garages. The neighborhood ARB and the covenants and restrictions are private, contractual matters and not a requirement or function of the zoning code. The ARB can grant relief from its standards, not the Board of Zoning Adjustment. It is the application of the ARB guidelines not the Town of Mount Pleasant Code of Ordinances that creates the hardship in this instance. (d) Authorization of a variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property or to the public good, and the character of the district will not be harmed by the granting of the variance for the following reasons: The applicant did address this requirement in the application. Photographs have been included in the staff report to illustrate the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Chris Ware, applicant, stated that different locations have been suggested in order to avoid the tree, but cannot be done. Ms. Milja-Smyly asked when the lot was purchased and platted. Mr. Ware answered that it was recently purchased. Ms. Milja-Smyly asked if the tree would have required a variance at the time of purchase. Mr. John Belton, (lot 71) stated that a 28 in oak is not shown on the plat and is one of the best looking trees in the neighborhood. He submitted a copy of the plat showing the encroachment onto the 28 in oak he is referring to. Mr. Smith asked about this tree. Mr. Robertson answered that it is not shown on the site plan and if they would like to remove the tree, they would have to seek approval and come back to the Board for a variance since it is a historic tree. Mr. Belton stated that he has been caring for the 28 inch oak. He suggested that the plan as proposed would not be
10 Page 10 of 11 Ms. Alisa Stanfield, 1756 West Canning, agrees with Mr. Belton in regard to his statements. She stated that the tree should not be removed and that the site plan is not consistent with the neighborhood. Mr. Ware suggested that this was an oversight of the surveyor. Mr. Gwinnup suggested that it was not a buildable lot. Mr. Moore moved to deny the request as the criteria for a variance has not been met as the conditions are not extraordinary to this lot, the property can be reasonably utilized, there is public detriment as evidenced with the public comment. Mr. Rosenthal seconded the motion. All in favor. 4. Case V-4-12, 1508 Capel St., TMS ; Request for a variance from the strict interpretation of (C)(2) to allow the removal of a 25 oak tree. Mr. Robertson reviewed staff comments as follows: Please see applicant s submittal for justification of the relief sought. The property is Zoned PD through the Dunes West/Park West Planned Development and R-3 within the PD. The applicant requests to remove a 26 oak from the property. Section (C)(2) states Removal of historic tree(s) on lots approved and recorded after April 1, 2000, shall require a variance from the Powers; Variances; Special Exceptions; Stays; Hearings, Decisions and Orders (2) states [the Board has the following powers] To hear and decide appeals for variance from the requirements of the zoning ordinance when strict application of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance may be granted in an individual case of unnecessary hardship, if the Board makes and explains, in writing the following findings: (a) There are extraordinary and exceptional circumstances pertaining to the particular piece of property; The property and its circumstances are similar to those of other recent decisions by the, Case V-1-12 where a tree was located in the buildable area of the lot and Case V-2-11 which was a request to remove an historic tree in order to construct a garage. (b) These conditions do not generally apply to other properties in the vicinity. The applicant did not address this item on the application. This condition is fairly common throughout the Town as seen in previous approvals and within the neighborhood as demonstrated by photographs showing neighboring properties. Further, the house plan shown is not in keeping with the adjacent homes. The adjacent homes do not generally have garages in front of the house. The homes with garages are accessed from the rear or side of the house. (c) Because of these conditions, the application of the ordinance to the
11 Page 11 of 11 particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property; The BOZA noted in the V-2-12 discussion that the utilization of the property is for a residential structure which could be located on the property and that a garage was not necessarily a requirement for a house but an accessory structure and therefore, not an unreasonable restriction. Further, the application notes that the neighborhood ARB requires side loaded garages. The neighborhood ARB and the covenants and restrictions are private, contractual matters and not a requirement or function of the zoning code. The ARB can grant relief from its standards, not the Board of Zoning Adjustment. It is the application of the ARB guidelines not the Town of Mount Pleasant Code of Ordinances that creates the hardship in this instance. (d) Authorization of a variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property or to the public good, and the character of the district will not be harmed by the granting of the variance for the following reasons: The applicant did address this requirement in the application. Photographs have been included in the staff report to illustrate the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Robertson reviewed the photos with the Board. Mr. Chris Ware stated that they have tried several configurations in order to avoid the trees, but have not been able to do so. Ms. Milja-Smyly asked when the lot was purchased and if the trees were on the lot at that time. Mr. Ware answered that the trees were on lot at the time of purchase. Ms. Milja-Smyly stated that this essentially is a self-imposed hardship. Ms. Alisa Stanfield, 1756 West Canning, stated that she is opposed to the request. Mr. Rosenthal moved for denial of the request as it does not meeting the criteria for a variance as outlined in Mr. Bryson seconded the motion. All in favor. F. Approval of Final Orders The Board signed orders for case #V There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. Submitted by, L. Lynes BOZA
We believe the Verizon application should be denied for the following reasons:
Town Hall East Board Members, Neighbors and Friends, As many of you know, Brenda Brooks and I met with MPC Development Review staff member Mike Reynolds on September 22 to discuss Verizon s Use On Review
More informationPlanning Commission Agenda
I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Planning Commission Agenda October 24, 2017 6:00 PM, Council Chambers, Independence City Hall City Code Chapter 14 and the staff reports are entered into the record. III.
More informationZoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180
Zoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180 MINUTES OF THE BRUNSWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 2018 PRESENT were MARTIN STEINBACH, CHAIRMAN,
More informationCITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY
ORIGIN/AUTHORITY Planning and Operations Committee Reports 2-2013 and 13-2013 ADOPTED BY: City Council CITY FILE NO. CK. 230-3 1 of 20 1. PURPOSE 1.1 To establish a policy that is consistent with Industry
More informationMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. December 6, 2018
A. Call to Order 7:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS December 6, 2018 1. Roll Call - the following members were present: T. Reis; B. Seitz; L. Reibel; and C. Crane; and also
More information290 NORTH 100 WEST, LOGAN, UTAH PHONE (435) FAX (435) PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting of December 10, 2009
290 NORTH 100 WEST, LOGAN, UTAH 84321 PHONE (435) 716-9021 FAX (435) 716-9001 www.loganutah.org PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting of December 10, 2009 M I N U T E S Municipal Council Chambers City Hall 290 North
More informationGary Godfrey, Chairperson. Invocation: Ron Anderson Pledge of Allegiance: Sharon Call
1 1 1 1 0 3 3 3 3 0 The Lindon City Planning Commission held a regularly scheduled meeting beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April, 009 in the Lindon City Center, City Council Chambers, 0 North State
More informationBOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OCTOBER 23, 2013 AGENDA
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OCTOBER 23, 2013 AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP2013-058: An appeal made by Sharon Knaub for a variance from the minimum 100-ft. left side yard setback from an adjacent dwelling to 70-ft.
More informationNotice of Decision. Construct exterior alteration to an existing Semi-detached House on Lot 42 (Driveway extension, 2.44metres x 6.0metres).
10019 103 Avenue NW Edmonton, AB T5J 0G9 P: 780-496-6079 F: 780-577-3537 sdab@edmonton.ca edmontonsdab.ca Date: September 7, 2018 Project Number: 284417740-001 File Number: SDAB-D-18-131 Notice of Decision
More informationQUASI-JUDICIAL ZONING APPEALS SPECIAL MASTER HEARING MINUTES CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA July 12, 2011 CALL TO ORDER
QUASI-JUDICIAL ZONING APPEALS SPECIAL MASTER HEARING MINUTES CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA July 12, 2011 CALL TO ORDER Special Master Jeffrey Siniawsky called the hearing to order at 2:00 p.m. in the
More informationMINUTES ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF RICHARDSON, TEXAS MARCH 15, 2017 APPROVED
MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF RICHARDSON, TEXAS The Zoning Board of Adjustment met in session at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, March 15, 2017, in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, 411 West
More informationCITY OF PISMO BEACH Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, December 9, 2014 DRAFT MINUTES. Chair White, Vice-Chair Hamrick, Jewell, Overland, Woodhouse.
CITY OF PISMO BEACH Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, December 9, 2014 DRAFT MINUTES Call to order: 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call: Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Staff present: Chair White, Vice-Chair
More informationAshland Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes of Meeting Ashland Elementary School Conference Room May 22, 2014
Ashland Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes of Meeting Ashland Elementary School Conference Room May 22, 2014 Members Present: Others Present: Ellison Badger, Elaine Allard, Michelle Fistek Patricia
More informationMINUTES ADJOURNED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 9, 2017
MINUTES ADJOURNED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 9, 2017 A adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills Estates was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
More informationBoard of Variance Minutes
Board of Variance Minutes Council Chamber City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2010 Time: 9:01 a.m. File: 0360-20 Present: Chairperson - M. Cooper A. Pease D. Kenny K. Nice Absent:
More informationThe oath was administered to Mary Werner, Sharon Fulop, Truman Irving, Marc Thompson, and Mike Muse.
The June 28, 2018 meeting of the Ottawa Hills Zoning Commission was called to order by Mayor Kevin Gilmore at 4:30 pm in the Community Room of the Elementary School. In attendance were members Sam Zyndorf,
More informationTOWN OF FARMINGTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES. Approved MINUTES
TOWN OF FARMINGTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES Approved MINUTES The following minutes are a written summary of the main points that were made and the actions taken at the Town of Farmington
More informationFrank A. Rush, Jr, Town Manager. Josh Edmondson, CZO, Town Planner
DATE: October 3, 2016 Nice Matters! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Frank A. Rush, Jr, Town Manager Josh Edmondson, CZO, Town Planner Special Use Application for Wireless Telecommunication Support Structure (WTSS)
More informationSpecial Plan Commission 1293 Washington Ave, Cedarburg Date/Time: November 6, 2013 / 6:45PM Posted: November 1, 2013
Meeting: Special Plan Commission Place: 1293 Washington Ave, Cedarburg Date/Time: November 6, 2013 / 6:45PM Web Page: www.town.cedarburg.wi.us Posted: November 1, 2013 Chairman Dave Valentine Town Administrator
More informationMINUTES OF MEETING ASHLAND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 22, 2018
MINUTES OF MEETING ASHLAND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 22, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Present: John Trefethen,
More informationZoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180
Zoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180 MINUTES OF THE BRUNSWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 PRESENT were MARTIN STEINBACH, CHAIRMAN,
More informationPlanning Commission Work Meeting Minutes Thursday, August 4, 2016 City Council Chambers 220 East Morris Avenue Time 6:30 p.m.
Planning Commission Work Meeting Minutes Thursday, City Council Chambers 220 East Morris Avenue Time 6:30 p.m. Commission Members Present: Staff Members Present: Jeremy Carter, Presiding Holly Carson Laura
More informationZONING BOARD OF EXAMINERS AND APPEALS Assembly Chambers Z.J. Loussac Library 3600 Denali Street Anchorage, Alaska. MINUTES OF May 11, :30 PM
A. ROLL CALL ZONING BOARD OF EXAMINERS AND APPEALS Assembly Chambers Z.J. Loussac Library 3600 Denali Street Anchorage, Alaska MINUTES OF May 11, 2017 6:30 PM Present Excused Staff Timothy Vig Dean Karcz
More informationZoning Board of Appeals Lakeville, Massachusetts Minutes of Meeting February 16, 2017
Zoning Board of Appeals Lakeville, Massachusetts Minutes of Meeting February 16, 2017 Members present: Donald Foster, Chair; David Curtis, Vice-Chair; John Olivieri, Jr., Clerk; Jim Gouveia, Member; Joseph
More informationC. Minutes of October 10, 2000 and October 24, 2000 were approved by consent.
OFFICIAL CITY OF LOS ANGELES Central Area Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, November 14, 2000 4:30 PM Figueroa Plaza - Room 170 201 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles California MINUTES OF THE CENTRAL AREA
More informationJune 16, 2015 Planning Board 1 DRAFT
June 16, 2015 Planning Board 1 A regular meeting of the Planning Board of the Village of Cooperstown was held in the Village Office Building, 22 Main Street, Cooperstown, New York on June 16, 2015 at 4:30
More informationSUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD PARKLAND COUNTY. Notice of Decision of Subdivision and Development Appeal Board
INTRODUCTION SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD PARKLAND COUNTY Legislative Services, Parkland County Centre 53109A HWY 779 Parkland County, AB T7Z 1R1 Telephone: (780) 968-3234 Fax: (780) 968-8413
More informationTown of Hamburg Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting October 3, Minutes
Town of Hamburg Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting October 3, 2017 Minutes The Town of Hamburg Board of Zoning Appeals met for a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in Room 7B of Hamburg
More informationCITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA VARIANCE REVIEW BOARD PUBLIC HEARING ACTION AGENDA SILENT ROLL CALL
CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA VARIANCE REVIEW BOARD PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: November 14, 2006 MEETING TIME: 6:30 PM 315 East Kennedy Boulevard, 3 rd Floor, City Council Chambers ACTION AGENDA SILENT ROLL
More informationApplication VARI : Robert Matulewic, Owner. Application VARI : Alan and Diane Handler, Owners
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING ST. CHARLES COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT DATE: February 4, 2016 TIME: PLACE: 7:00 P.M. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING 201 NORTH SECOND ST. FIRST FLOOR MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
More informationCITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD-OF-DECISION
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD-OF-DECISION January 20, 2011 Page 16 NEW BUSINESS CALENDAR MEETING: JANUARY 20, 2011 ITEM: 5 STAFF: FILE NO: PROJECT : BRETT VELTMAN CPC NV 10-00098(RF)
More informationOrange Tree Master Maintenance Association Information Package for Architectural Review
What needs to be approved? Orange Tree Master Maintenance Association Information Package for Architectural Review The Master Covenants for Orange Tree provide for the review by committee of any and all
More informationDRAFT MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION May 29, 2018
DRAFT MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Maple Grove Planning Commission was held at 7:00 p.m. on at the Maple Grove City Hall, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Chair Colson called
More informationPLAN COMMISSION AND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES. September 6, 2018
PLAN COMMISSION AND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES September 6, 2018 ROLL CALL: Chairwoman Ochoa Present Commissioner Hollingshead Present Commissioner Wood Absent Commissioner Kloth Present Commissioner
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Elizabeth Corpuz, Director of Planning and Building Services Jason P. Clarke, Senior Planner
Page 1 of 16 14-L TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Elizabeth Corpuz, Director of Planning and Building Services Jason P. Clarke,
More informationCITY OF ESCONDIDO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ESCONDIDO PLANNING COMMISSION. August 13, 2013
CITY OF ESCONDIDO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ESCONDIDO PLANNING COMMISSION August 13, 2013 The meeting of the Escondido Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Weber
More informationOFFICE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 559 Los Angeles, CA 90012
City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 559 Los Angeles, CA 90012 February 2, 2015 TO: Jose Huizar, Chair Planning and Land Use Management Committee FROM: Ken Bernstein, AICP Manager, Office of Historic Resources
More informationBoard of Variance Minutes
Board of Variance Minutes City Manager's Board Room City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2001 Time: 9:00 a.m. Present: Chairperson - M. Cooper D. Cutler J. Grenier Absent: B. Dack
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS November 1, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PROCEDURES Summary of Civil Code 4765
NOTICE TO MEMBERS November 1, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PROCEDURES Summary of Civil Code 4765 Section a) of Civil Code 4765 requires that this section applies if the association s governing documents require
More informationTitle 5 Code Amendments: Short-Term Rental (STR) Operating License. Adopted through Ordinance 2028 on November 29, 2016
City of Hood River, Oregon Title 5 s: Short-Term Rental (STR) Operating License. Adopted through Ordinance 2028 on November 29, 2016 The following code amendments to Title 5 (Business Taxes, Licenses and
More informationLIVONIA JOINT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES- February 2, 2015
LIVONIA JOINT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES- February 2, 2015 Present: Chair P. Nilsson, M. Sharman, G. Cole, R. Bergin, J. Campbell-Town Attorney, Code Enforcement Officer A. Backus, Recording
More informationMINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF CHESTER AUGUST 06, The meeting was called to order by Chairman Grady at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF CHESTER AUGUST 06, 2015 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Grady at 7:00 p.m. ATTENDANCE: Chairperson John Grady, Mary Jane Dower, Arnold
More informationEdmonton Subdivision and Development Appeal Board
Edmonton Subdivision and Development Appeal Board Churchill Building 10019-103 Avenue NW Edmonton, AB T5J 0G9 Phone: 780-496-6079 Fax: 780-577-3537 Email: sdab@edmonton.ca Web: www.edmontonsdab.ca Notice
More informationCity of Sanford Zoning Board of Appeals
City of Sanford Zoning Board of Appeals The Sanford Zoning Board of Appeals scheduled a meeting on Wednesday, April 9, 2014 at the Sanford City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mark Patterson at
More informationHODDENBACH AIRCRAFT HANGAR CONDITIONAL USE AND SITE PLAN SOUTH 1640 WEST KYLE PHILLIPS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Beecher, Chairman Jennifer Bassarear Dan Bradford STAFF PRESENT: Tim Stephens, Community Development Director Bonnie Craig, Secretary James Sheldon, City Council Member Brent Page
More informationTOWN OF SOUTHPORT 1139 Pennsylvania Avenue Elmira, NY 14904
TOWN OF SOUTHPORT 1139 Pennsylvania Avenue Elmira, NY 14904 Minutes Approved by Board of Appeals 9/19/2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Wednesday, August 15, 2018 7:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING Horvath Communications
More informationConducting: Matt Bean, Chairperson Invocation: Matt Bean, Chairperson Pledge of Allegiance: Angie Neuwirth
1 1 1 1 0 3 3 3 3 0 The Lindon City Planning Commission held a regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, July, 011 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Lindon City Center, City Council Chambers, 0 North State Street,
More informationCLEARFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 7, :00 P.M. Regular Session
CLEARFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 7, 2018 7:00 P.M. Regular Session PRESIDING: Brady Jugler Chair PRESENT: Kathryn Murray Commissioner Robert Browning Commissioner Michael Britton Commissioner
More informationCORONADO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. Regular Meeting March 8, 2011
CORONADO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting The regular meeting of the Coronado Planning Commission was called to order at 3:05 p.m., Tuesday,, at the Coronado City Hall Council Chambers,
More informationMINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE JULY 14, 2011
A meeting of the Land Development and Transportation Committee was held on, July 14, 2011 at 1:00 P.M. in the Old Jail Building, located at 514 W. Liberty Street, Louisville, Kentucky. Committee Members
More informationCITY OF ISSAQUAH PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION MINUTES. August 27, Council Chambers Issaquah, WA 98027
CITY OF ISSAQUAH PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION MINUTES August 27, 2015 City Hall South 135 E. Sunset Way Council Chambers Issaquah, WA 98027 PPC MEMBERS PRESENT Joan Probala, Chair Ray Extract Joy Lewis Carl
More informationCITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE
CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE Planning and Zoning Board Regular Meeting The Planning and Zoning Board met in formal session Tuesday,, at 2:00 p.m. in the Alcazar Room at City Hall. The meeting was called to order
More informationMINUTES OF MEETING ALAMEDA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 4, 2009 (Approved May 18, 2009)
FIELD TRIP: MINUTES OF MEETING MAY 4, 2009 (Approved May 18, 2009) MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Kathie Ready and Richard Rhodes. MEMBERS EXCUSED: Commissioners Ken Carbone, Chair; Frank Imhof; Mike Jacob,
More informationDistrict of Maple Ridge Telecommunication Antenna Structures Siting Protocols (V2)
District of Maple Ridge Telecommunication Antenna Structures Siting Protocols (V2) Purpose: The purpose of the Telecommunication Antenna Structures Siting Protocols is to establish procedural standards
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT. { In re Lowre Variance { Docket No Vtec { Decision on Motion to Dismiss
STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT { In re Lowre Variance { Docket No. 19-2-11 Vtec { Decision on Motion to Dismiss Cheryl Monteith ( Appellant ) has appealed a decision of the Town of Peacham Zoning
More informationMINUTES. BOARD/COMMISSION: Architectural Review DATE: 6/11/14. MEETING: Regular CALLED TO ORDER: 7:04 p.m. QUORUM: Yes ADJOURNED: 9:07 p.m.
MINUTES BOARD/COMMISSION: Architectural Review DATE: 6/11/14 MEETING: Regular CALLED TO ORDER: 7:04 p.m. QUORUM: Yes ADJOURNED: 9:07 p.m. MEMBER ATTENDANCE: PRESENT: Chairman Burdett, Commissioners Albrecht,
More informationFLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET Sutter County Water Resources Department 1130 Civic Center Boulevard Yuba City, California, 95993 (530) 822-7400 Floodplain management regulations cannot
More information200 East Main Street, Lexington, KY Board of Adjustment Meeting. MINUTES FOR THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING April 25, 2014
Urban County Board of Adjustment Planning Services Section 200 East Main Street, Lexington, KY Board of Adjustment Meeting MINUTES FOR THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING April 25, 2014 I. ATTENDANCE - The
More informationMac Kinley s Mill Homeowners Association. Architectural Rules and Regulations
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW A. Purpose Mac Kinley s Mill Homeowners Association Architectural Rules and Regulations Clarified Rules and Regulations Adopted: September 17, 2013 The guidelines for the MacKinley
More informationBIRMINGHAM BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 City Commission Room 151 Martin Street, Birmingham, Michigan
BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 City Commission Room 151 Martin Street, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the City of Birmingham Board of
More informationTown of Hamburg. Planning Board Meeting. August 19, Minutes
Town of Hamburg Planning Board Meeting August 19, 2009 Minutes The Town of Hamburg Planning Board met in regular session on Wednesday, August 19, 2009 at 7:30 p.m. in Room 7B of Hamburg Town Hall, 6100
More informationReasonable Modification from the Planning Code
APPLICATION PACKET Reasonable Modification from the Planning Code SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1650 MISSION STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103-2479 MAIN: (415) 558-6378 SFPLANNING.ORG Planning
More informationBUILDING BOARD MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, August 15, 2017
BUILDING BOARD MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, August 15, 2017 Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mr. Olson. 1. Roll Call. Present: Mr. Liechty, Mr. Matola, Mr. Schoenecker, Mr. Collins, Mr. Koleski,
More informationBRISTOL ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT June 26, 2018
BRISTOL ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT June 26, 2018 APPROVED: 7/10/18 jrl AGENDA: ATTENDING: ABSENT: OTHER: CONTINUED 18APP01 APPEAL FROM ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION: DOWEY, FREEMAN, HUOT, & PINKNEY (abutters),
More informationMINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. June 5, 2017
MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills Estates was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4045 Palos Verdes
More informationVariance FAQ s. Prepared by the Sitka Planning Office, Sara Russell, Planning Assistant Wells Williams, Planning Director
Variance FAQ s Prepared by the Sitka Planning Office, 747-1814 Sara Russell, Planning Assistant Wells Williams, Planning Director Outline of Questions Answered on the following Pages - What is a setback?
More informationOctober 10, 2017 City of Erie, Pennsylvania ZONING HEARING BOARD 1:00 P.M. -- MINUTES
October 10, 2017 City of Erie, Pennsylvania ZONING HEARING BOARD 1:00 P.M. The regular meeting of the Zoning Hearing Board was held Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at1:00 P.M. in City Council Chambers, City
More informationChair George Murphey called the meeting at 6:30 p.m. to order with the following in attendance:
City of Elk Grove Minutes of the Planning Commission Regular Meeting Thursday, July 7, 2011 CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Chair George Murphey called the meeting at 6:30 p.m. to order with the following in
More informationCommunity Dev. Coord./Deputy City Recorder
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 NORTH OGDEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES December 4, 2013 The North
More informationTOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING October 11, 2017
TOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING October 11, 2017 The Planning Board for the Town of Duck convened at the Paul F. Keller Meeting Hall on Wednesday, October 11, 2017. Present were: Chair Joe
More informationLivonia Joint Zoning Board of Appeals April 18, 2016
Present: Chair P. Nilsson, R. Bergin, G. Cole, M. Sharman, B. Weber, Code Enforcement Officer-A. Backus, Recording Secretary-A. Houk Excused: James Campbell, Attorney AGENDA: (1) Accept and approve the
More informationRULES AND REGULATIONS. DEFINITIONS (100 Series)
HIGH OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNIT shall means: RULES AND REGULATIONS DEFINITIONS (100 Series) any operating Public School as defined in 22-7-703(4), C.R.S., Nonpublic School as defined in 22-30.5-103.6(6.5),
More informationA motion to accept the following resolution was made by J.Bird and seconded by G.Herbert.
TOWN OF JERUSALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Approved October 12, 2012 The regular monthly meeting of the Town of Jerusalem Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order by Chairman Glenn Herbert on Thursday,
More informationspace left over for 50 Development Director Cory Snyder had asked him to see if there would be any
1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING 2 Wednesday, October 24, 2018 3 7: 00 p.m. 4 5 A quorum being present at Centerville City Hall, 250 North Main Street, Centerville, Utah, the 6 meeting of the Centerville
More informationDeering Zoning Board Of Adjustment 762 Deering Center Road Deering, New Hampshire Minutes of the Meeting of August 29, 2013 Deering Town Hall
Approved December 19, 2013 /s/ John A. Lassey, Chair Deering Zoning Board Of Adjustment 762 Deering Center Road Deering, New Hampshire 03244 Minutes of the Meeting of August 29, 2013 Deering Town Hall
More informationCITY OF LACOMBE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD BOARD ORDER. Issued August 2, 2016
CITY OF LACOMBE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD BOARD ORDER Issued August 2, 2016 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL by Ross Pickett against a decision by the City of Lacombe Development Authority on
More information2020 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code. Monday, April 1, 2019, at 5:00 p.m.
APPLICATION PACKET 2020 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code Application Deadline: Monday, April 1, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Application Fee: $1,400 Submittal Requirements:
More informationThe Vineyard Town Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 19, 2017, starting at 6:30 PM in the Vineyard Town hall.
MINUTES OF THE VINEYARD TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Vineyard City Offices, 240 East Gammon Road, Vineyard, Utah Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Commissioner Chair Chris Judd Commissioner
More informationBOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AGENDA
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AGENDA MAY 29, 2018 Minutes April 2018... 3 May 2018... 12 case no 1 1204 castleman ave sw... 14... 15 QUESTIONNAIRE... 15 MAP... 16 CASE NO 2 427 CLEARVIEW ST SW... 17 QUESTIONNAIRE...
More informationMINUTES CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER MAY 13, 2014
APPROVED 6/10/2014 MINUTES CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER MAY 13, 2014 CALL MEETING TO ORDER: Chair White called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. and made standard
More informationMINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION. REGULAR MEETING November 6, : 00 P. M.
MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING November 6, 2018 6: 00 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Highland was called to order at 6: 00 p. m. by Chair
More informationC. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 12, 2010 1760 Solano Avenue Use Permit Modification 09-70000017 to modify the T-Mobile wireless telecommunication
More informationZoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180
Zoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180 MINUTES OF THE BRUNSWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 2019 PRESENT were MARTIN STEINBACH, CHAIRMAN,
More informationMINUTES OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING BOROUGH OF ORADELL HELD IN THE TOWN HALL FEBRUARY 21, 2018
MINUTES OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING BOROUGH OF ORADELL HELD IN THE TOWN HALL FEBRUARY 21, 2018 Chairman Michelman called the Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
More informationBOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: January 5, 2015
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: January 5, 2015 CASE NUMBER 5944/5732/5632 APPLICANT NAME LOCATION VARIANCE REQUEST ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce 451 Government
More informationBIRMINGHAM BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2017 City Commission Room 151 Martin Street, Birmingham, Michigan
BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2017 City Commission Room 151 Martin Street, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the City of Birmingham Board of Zoning
More informationMINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION September 8, Side yard setback variance for an entry and living space addition at 3133 Shores Boulevard
MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION September 8, 2016 Brief Description Side yard setback variance for an entry and living space addition at 3133 Shores Boulevard Recommendation Adopt the resolution approving
More informationCITY OF NORWALK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 7, 2015 (approved June 4, 2015)
CITY OF NORWALK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (approved June 4, 2015) PRESENT: STAFF: OTHERS: Taylor Strubinger, Chair; Joe Beggan; Keith Lyon; Lee Levey; Nadine Campbell; Juanita Olguin Aline Rochefort; Vladimir
More information1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.
1 1 1 3 3 0 2 The Lindon City held a regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, June, 1 at 7:00 p.m. at the Lindon City Center, City Council Chambers, 0 North State Street, Lindon, Utah. REGULAR SESSION 7:00
More informationDRAFT. Gayle Champagne Steven Kalczynski Lisa Krueger Judith Paskiewicz Al Vaitas. Ingrid Tighe. Sara Burton Jason O'Dell
City of Birmingham ADVISORY PARKING COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING Birmingham City Hall Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Wednesday, MINUTES These are the minutes for the Advisory Parking Committee
More informationPublic Meeting Hood River, OR September 6, 2016
City of Hood River City Council Chambers Planning Commission 211 Second Street Public Meeting Hood River, OR 97031 September 6, 2016 PRESENT: Commissioners Nathan DeVol (chair), Victor Pavlenko, Jodie
More informationARTICLE I OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE
City & County of San Francisco BOARD OF APPEALS RULES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS ARTICLE I OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be elected at the first regular meeting
More informationMINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. February 6, 2017
MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills Estates was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4045 Palos Verdes
More informationOGUNQUIT PLANNING BOARD REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES DUNAWAY CENTER MAIN AUDITORIUM JULY 23, 2018 REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
Mr. Town of Ogunquit Planning Board Post Office Box 875 Ogunquit, Maine 03907-0875 Tel: 207-646-9326 A. ROLL CALL 6:00 P.M. OGUNQUIT PLANNING BOARD REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES DUNAWAY CENTER MAIN
More informationCITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD-OF-DECISION
Page 5 CONSENT CALENDAR MEETING: NOVEMBER 19, 2009 ITEM : STAFF: FILE NO(S): PROJECT : B.1-B.2 STEVE TUCK CPC ZC 09-00074, AR CP 05-00100-A1MJ09 POWERS AUTOPARK II Items pulled from Consent by City staff.
More informationMINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2010 @ 7:00 p.m. Present: Members: B. Hawrelak, D. Kilpatrick, V. Lutz, G. Shipley, C. Brown Planning Consultant
More informationCITY OF NORWALK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 (Approved October 1, 2009)
Zoning Board of Appeals September 3, 2009 Minutes (Final) CITY OF NORWALK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 (Approved October 1, 2009) I. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Strubinger called the meeting to order
More informationCommission Members Present: Chris Berbert, Andrea Bradford, Adam Jacobson, Curt Noble, Robyn Shakespear, Wade Thompson
The following are the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held on Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. in the Herriman City Community Center, 13011 South Pioneer Street (6000 West), Herriman, Utah.
More informationCounty Barn Road RPUD. Deviation Justification
1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2 which requires dual sidewalks on local roads internal to the site, to allow a sidewalk on one side of the roadway where the property is permitted
More informationTOWN OF BRISTOL ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES. Thursday, June 18, 2015
TOWN OF BRISTOL ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES Thursday, June 18, 2015 The following petitions were received and were heard by the Bristol Zoning Board of Review on Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 7:00 p.m.
More information