July 28, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF
|
|
- Conrad Goodwin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Settlement Agreement July 28, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF IAN MACDONALD, EDWARD BOYD, PETER DENNIS AND DAVID SINGH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc. ( RS ) has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the conduct of Ian Macdonald ( Macdonald ), Edward Boyd ( Boyd ), Peter Dennis ( Dennis ) and David Singh ( Singh ) (hereinafter referred to collectively as the Respondents ). The Investigation has disclosed matters for which RS seeks certain sanctions against the Respondents pursuant to Rule 10.5 of the Universal Market Integrity Rules ( UMIR ). If this Offer of Settlement is accepted by the Respondents, the resulting settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ), which has been negotiated in accordance with Part 3 of UMIR Policy 10.8, is conditional upon the approval by a hearing panel (the Hearing Panel ) of the Hearing Committee appointed under Part 10 of UMIR Policy 10.8.
2 2 The Respondents agree to waive all rights under UMIR to a hearing or to an appeal or review if the Settlement Agreement is approved by the Hearing Panel. RS and the Respondents jointly recommend that the Hearing Panel accept this Settlement Agreement. B. AGREEMENT AS TO REQUIREMENTS CONTRAVENED It is agreed that the following Requirements have been contravened by the Respondents: On August 11, 2004, the Respondents effected trades in shares of Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal in the Market On Close Facility of the Toronto Stock Exchange which involved no change of beneficial or economic ownership, which constitutes a manipulative and deceptive method of trading, contrary to UMIR Rules 2.2(1) and 2.2(2)(b), for which they are liable pursuant to UMIR 10.4(1)(a). C. ADMITTED FACTS RS relies upon the admitted facts which are set out in the Statement of Allegations attached as Appendix A to this Settlement Agreement. D. DISPOSITION For the contraventions in paragraph 6 above, Macdonald and RS have agreed upon the following disposition: (a) A fine of $90, payable by Macdonald to RS; and, (b) Costs of $35, payable to RS.
3 3 For the contraventions in paragraph 6 above, Boyd and RS have agreed upon the following disposition: (c) A fine of $60, payable by Boyd to RS; and, (d) Costs of $20, payable to RS. For the contraventions in paragraph 6 above, Singh and RS have agreed upon the following disposition: (e) A fine of $60, payable by Singh to RS; and, (f) Costs of $20, payable to RS. For the contraventions in paragraph 6 above, Dennis and RS have agreed upon the following disposition: (g) A fine of $20, payable by Dennis to RS; and, (h) Costs of $7, payable to RS. If this Settlement Agreement is accepted by a Hearing Panel, MacDonald, Boyd, Dennis and Singh, as the case may be, agree to pay the amounts referred to in paragraphs 8, 9, 10 and 11 within 30 days of such acceptance. E. PROCEDURES FOR ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement shall be presented to a Hearing Panel at a public hearing (the Approval Hearing ) held for the purpose of approving the Settlement Agreement, in accordance with the procedures described in UMIR Policy 10.8 in
4 4 addition to any other procedures as may be agreed upon between the parties. The Respondents acknowledge that RS shall notify the public and media of the Approval Hearing in such manner and by such media as RS sees fit. Pursuant to Part 3.4 of UMIR Policy 10.8, the Hearing Panel may accept or reject this Settlement Agreement. In the event the Settlement Agreement is accepted by a Hearing Panel, the matter becomes final, there can be no appeal or review of the matter, the disposition of the matter agreed upon in this Settlement Agreement will be included in the permanent record of RS in respect of the Respondents, and RS will publish a summary of the Requirements contravened, the facts, and the disposition agreed upon in the Settlement Agreement. In the event the Hearing Panel rejects the Settlement Agreement, RS may proceed with a hearing of the matter before a differently constituted Hearing Panel pursuant to Part 3.7 of UMIR Policy 10.8 and this Settlement Agreement may not be referred to without the consent of RS and the Respondents. F. OTHER MATTERS The Respondents agree that, in the event the Respondents fail to comply with any of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, RS may enforce this settlement in any manner it deems appropriate and may, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, suspend the Respondents access to marketplaces regulated by RS until RS determines that the Respondents are in full compliance with all terms of the Settlement Agreement.
5 5 The Respondents agrees that neither them, nor anyone on their behalf, will make a public statement inconsistent with this Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreement may be signed in counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Settlement Agreement as of the dates noted below. DATED at Vancouver on the 26th day of July, Glen Hancock Witness Signature Ian Macdonald Ian Macdonald Glen Hancock Name of Witness 4707 Cannery Place, Delta, BC Address of Witness DATED at Toronto on the 26th day of July, D. Hausman Witness Signature E. Boyd Edward Boyd David Hausman Name of Witness Suite 4200, TD Bank Tower, 66 Wellington Street W. Address of Witness DATED at Montreal, QC on the 26th day of July, B. Kalushny Witness Signature Peter Dennis Peter Dennis Billy Kalushny Name of Witness
6 6 Address of Witness DATED at Toronto on the 26th day of July, D. Hausman Witness Signature David Singh David Singh Dave Hausman Name of Witness Suite 4200, TD Bank Tower, 66 Wellington Street W. Address of Witness DATED at Toronto, Ontario on the 25 th day of July, Per: M. Jensen Maureen Jensen Vice President Market Regulation, Eastern Region Market Regulation Services Inc. This foregoing Settlement Agreement is hereby accepted this 28 th day of July, 2005, by the following hearing panel constituted to review the terms thereof: Per: Lloyd W. Houlden Panel Chair Per: Dusty Graham Per: Hillery J. Lloyd Panel Member Panel Member
7 APPENDIX "A" IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF IAN MACDONALD, EDWARD BOYD, PETER DENNIS AND DAVID SINGH (Hereinafter referred to as the Respondents ) STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS I. REQUIREMENTS CONTRAVENED 1. The Respondents agree that they contravened Universal Market Integrity Rules ("UMIR") 2.2(1) and 2.2(2)(b), for which they are liable pursuant to UMIR 10.4(1)(a). 2. The text of the relevant Requirements is set out at Schedule "A". II. THE FACTS RELIED UPON A. General Overview 3. The RBC Dominion Securities Inc. ( RBC DS ) employees involved in this transaction were: Ian Macdonald ( Macdonald ), Edward Boyd ( Boyd ), David Singh ( Singh ) and Peter Dennis ( Dennis ). 4. The Market-on-Close Facility ( MOC Facility ) of the Toronto Stock Exchange ( TSX ) permits the entry of market orders to trade at the closing price ( Market MOC Order ) from 7:00 to 15:40. At 15:40, the TSX calculates and broadcasts the order imbalance for each of the securities participating in the MOC Facility
8 2. indicating whether the imbalance is on the buy or sell side and size of the imbalance. 5. After 15:40, only limit orders on the opposite side of the market as the imbalance ( Limit MOC Order ) may be entered into the MOC Facility. The MOC Facility is blind as there is no transparency with respect to particular orders entered as market MOC orders or limit MOC orders. 6. A Market MOC Order entered prior to 15:40 may not be amended or cancelled at any time after 15:40 and any Limit MOC Order entered prior to 16:00 may not be amended or cancelled at any time after 16:00. The purpose of this is to protect the integrity of the published imbalances upon which market participants rely to make investment decisions between 3:40 and 4:00 p.m. 7. Entry by a Participant of a limit MOC Order to off-set a market MOC Order entered by that Participant constitutes a wash trade. As stated by RS in a Market Integrity Notice dated August 26, 2004, it is unacceptable for a Participant to undertake a wash trade, directly or indirectly, even in circumstances where the Participant is trying to correct an existing market MOC Order or to limit its liability due to an existing MOC Order. This Notice further stated that it was RS s position that such conduct may constitute a manipulative and deceptive method of trading, within the meaning of UMIR 2.2(2)(b). 8. On August 11, 2004, RBC DS and a Canadian chartered bank ( Bank A ) agreed to execute trades in the shares of Royal Bank of Canada ( RY ) and Bank of Montreal ( BMO ) to establish hedges to over the counter SWAP trades. Both RBC DS and Dealer Y, who acted as agent for Bank A, were to enter the market orders into the MOC Facility on the TSX so that the RY and BMO shares in the transaction received their respective closing price levels on opposite sides of the market.
9 3. 9. Boyd entered the RBC DS market MOC orders for RY and BMO at 12:20:53 and 12:21:13, respectively. The orders were entered for RBC DS inventory accounts. 10. Dealer Y failed to enter the Bank A s side of the BMO trade into the MOC Facility prior to 15:40 because it attached an improper marker when attempting to input the BMO order. Dealer Y entered the Bank A s side of the RY market MOC order but then cancelled the RY order prior to 15:40 because Dealer Y incorrectly thought that RBC DS had not entered its side of the trade into the MOC Facility, because Dealer Y was unaware that the MOC Facility was blind. 11. At 15:40 on August 11, 2004, large MOC Facility imbalances were broadcast on RY and BMO as a result of the entry of the RBC DS orders in the MOC Facility and Dealer Y s failure to enter the agreed upon market orders for RY and BMO shares into the MOC Facility. 12. After the MOC imbalances were broadcast, Dealer Y responded by entering limit orders into the MOC Facility for RY and BMO shares. 13. After discussions amongst the Respondents concerning how they could limit RBC DS s potential liability caused by Dealer Y s errors, Singh instructed Bank A to have Dealer Y cancel the limit orders for the RY and BMO shares which Bank A told the Respondents had been entered into the MOC Facility by Dealer Y for Bank A. 14. Boyd and Dennis then entered offsetting limit MOC orders for RBC DS inventory accounts in the shares of RY and BMO into the MOC Facility. 15. The Respondents knew the MOC Facility allocation mechanism increased the probability that MOC imbalance orders would trade against MOC limit orders in time priority, causing wash trades, since unintentional crosses always trade first.
10 Just after 16:00, a substantial part of RBC DS s limit MOC orders were traded against RBC DS s market MOC orders entered earlier that day. When executed, these offsetting orders caused the RY and BMO shares to be wash traded through unintentional crosses. 17. The Respondents knew when the limit MOC orders in RY and BMO shares were entered into the MOC Facility that any ensuing unintentional crosses would increase the likelihood of trades involving no change of beneficial ownership. 18. None of the Respondents contacted RS for direction after learning of the MOC imbalances and why they had occurred. The Respondents knew that it was not possible for the MOC market orders to be cancelled, which is why they considered, but then did not call the TSX, about cancellation. Dennis and Macdonald discussed putting in offsetting orders for Bank A through Bank A s RBC DS account. Consideration was again given to calling the TSX prior to entering the offsetting orders. Macdonald and Dennis decided not to call. The Respondents entered the offsetting orders to limit the potential liability created by the MOC Imbalance. RBC DS Personnel 19. Macdonald is a Managing Director, Canadian Equity Derivatives at RBC DS. He was the most senior individual at RBC DS involved in the impugned trading which is detailed herein and he was responsible for overseeing it. 20. Boyd is a Vice-President, Canadian Equity Derivatives and a trader at RBC DS. 21. Singh is a Director, Canadian Equity Derivatives and a sales trader at RBC DS. 22. Dennis is a Senior Equity and Derivatives trader at RBC DS.
11 5. The Transactions in Question 23. On the morning of August 11, 2004, RBC DS and Bank A agreed to execute the following transactions: (a) RBC DS was to enter market MOC Facility orders to buy 344,500 shares of BMO and sell 265,000 shares of RY; (b) Bank A (through Dealer Y) was to enter market MOC Facility orders to sell 344,500 shares of BMO and buy 265,000 shares of RY. 24. As stated above, at RBC DS, the transactions were overseen by Macdonald. Macdonald was aware of the ongoing actions taken by Singh, Boyd and Dennis which are detailed herein. 25. At 12:20:53, Boyd entered a day market order to sell 265,000 shares of RY using the IN (inventory) marker and the MOC Facility. The order was entered for an inventory account in the name of Boyd. 26. At 12:21:13, Boyd entered a day market order to buy 344,500 shares of BMO using the IN marker and the MOC Facility. The order was entered for an inventory account in the name of Boyd. 27. At 15:21:22, Dealer Y entered a day market order to buy 265,000 shares of RY using the CL (client) market and the MOC Facility. RBC DS could not confirm that this order had been placed because the MOC facility is blind. 28. Dealer Y time stamped a ticket for an order to sell 344,500 BMO shares at 15:17. The client shown on the ticket was non-canadian. Because Dealer Y had attached a non-resident marker to the order, it was not accepted into the MOC Facility. Dealer Y made several unsuccessful attempts to enter this order.
12 At no time prior to 15:40 on August 15, 2004 did Bank A or Dealer Y inform RBC DS that there were any problems respecting the placing of the counterparty orders. 30. Market orders are blind in the MOC Facility Order Book prior to 15:40. At 15:37:56, Dealer Y cancelled its order to purchase the 265,000 shares of RY when the Dealer Y traders did not see the expected RBC DS MOC market order in RY shares, and assumed it had not been entered. The traders at Dealer Y were unaware of the blind nature of the MOC Facility market orders for Book prior to 15: As a result of the failure of Dealer Y to enter the offsetting orders to the orders entered by RBC DS, the following MOC Facility imbalances (the MOC Imbalance ) were broadcast at 15:40: (a) (b) RY Sell 288,300 MOC; and, BMO Buy 328,800 MOC. 32. Following the broadcast, Singh called Bank A to enquire about the entry of Bank A s side of the arrangement. Discussion ensued between the Respondents and Bank A pursuant to which the Respondents learned that the MOC Imbalance had been caused, or contributed to, by Dealer Y s failure to enter the offsetting orders. 33. Upon learning that Dealer Y had not entered the offsetting orders, following numerous discussions after the broadcast of the imbalance, the Respondents concluded with only a few minutes remaining in the trading day that, based on the express provisions of TSX Rule governing trading on the MOC Facility, the TSX could not cancel the orders so the Respondents did not contact either the TSX or RS and pursued other means of addressing the potential liability accruing to RBC DS resulting from the imbalance.
13 At 15:47:48, Dealer Y entered a day limit order to buy 265,000 shares of RY at $64.80 using the CL marker and the MOC Facility. The market at the time was $60.66/$ At 15:51:51, Dealer Y entered a day limit order to sell 328,800 shares of BMO at $49.27 using the CL marker and the MOC Facility. The market at this time was $53.63/$ These orders were entered by Dealer Y in an attempt to fulfill its side of the agreement with Bank A and to offset the MOC imbalance created by their previously failed attempts to enter the MOC orders. 37. However, the Respondents were unable to confirm that these orders had been properly entered and were concerned that the entry of these orders by Dealer Y would not sufficiently limit the potential liability created by the MOC Imbalance. 38. After discussion among the Respondents, Singh instructed Bank A to have Dealer Y cancel their orders which Bank A told them had been entered so that Dennis and Boyd could enter limit MOC orders in RY and BMO. The Respondents knew because of the allocation mechanism of the MOC Facility, this would increase the probability that these limit orders would be wash traded by way of unintentional crosses with RBC DS s original market orders entered at 12:20:53 and 12:21:13, respectively. 39. At 15:57:01, Dealer Y s 15:51:51 order to sell BMO shares was cancelled at Singh s request. Likewise, Dealer Y s order for RY shares entered at 15:47:48 was cancelled at 15:57: At 15:56:36, Dennis entered a day limit order to buy 265,000 shares of RY at $62.00 using the NC ( non-client ) marker and the MOC Facility. The market at this time was $60.63/$ This order was cancelled at 15:58.37 as Macdonald felt the price was too high and wanted to limit any potential of establishing a disorderly closing price for RY. Although the order was marked
14 8. non-client because Dennis Kasten Chase terminal defaulted to non-client, it was entered for a RBC DS inventory account. 41. As set out above, in accordance with Macdonald s instructions, at 15:58:46, Dennis entered a day limit order to buy 265,000 shares of RY at $61.00 into the MOC Facility. The market at this time was $60.63/$ The order was also entered for a RBC DS inventory account, although it defaulted to nonclient. 42. At 15:59:45, Boyd entered a day limit order to sell 328,000 shares of BMO at $52.50 using an IN marker and the MOC Facility. The market at this time was $53.44/$ This order was also entered for RBC DS inventory account. 43. At 16:05:00, the limit MOC order entered by Boyd to sell 328,000 shares of BMO at 15:59:45 crossed with RBC DS s market MOC order to buy 344,500 shares of BMO entered at 12:21:13. The cross price was $ At 16:05:01, 264,700 shares of RBC DS s MOC limit order to buy 265,000 shares of RY entered at 15:58:46 by Dennis crossed with RBC DS s MOC market order to sell 265,000 shares of RY entered at 12:20:53. The cross price was $ The orders entered in RY and BMO at 15:58:46 and 15:59:45, caused unintentional crosses between inventory accounts at RBC DS. There was no change of beneficial ownership, resulting in wash trades. 46. The wash trades were effected to limit RBC DS s potential liability created by the MOC Imbalance. 47. Before entering the offsetting orders in RY and BMO into the MOC Facility at 15:58:46 and 15:59:45 respectively, Macdonald questioned Dennis as to whether they should contact the TSX. Macdonald stated: You don t think we should try the Exchange. Dennis replied: No, no, I would just offset it. Subsequently, the offsetting orders were entered by Dennis and Boyd.
15 RBC DS was left long 16,000 BMO shares after the wash trades. Boyd and Macdonald discussed whether the shares should be sold. They decided not to so. 49. After the close of the market at 16:00, RS contacted Boyd after detecting what appeared to be wash trades in RY and BMO in the MOC Facility. Boyd subsequently confirmed to RS that the trades were the result of an error by another dealer. RS subsequently cancelled the trades. 50. In a telephone conversation among RS, Macdonald and another RBC DS employee on August 12, 2004, Macdonald confirmed to RS that the trades were conducted to mitigate the liability of RBC DS caused by the MOC Imbalance, which, in turn, was a result of Dealer Y s errors. 51. The Respondents conduct avoided a potential liability to RBC DS and impacted negatively on the market integrity of the MOC Facility. Their conduct had a direct impact on market participants who traded on the basis of the MOC Imbalance broadcast of 15:40 in the period between 15:40 and 16:00 on August 11, RS has estimated the net losses incurred by certain clients, firm inventory accounts and registered traders at various Participants in respect of the shares of BMO and RY as follows: (a) RY: $3, (b) BMO: $259, (this includes the $31, loss for RBC DS). 53. The estimated net losses of $231, were calculated by taking the difference between the sales proceeds received for the RY shares and the cost paid for the BMO shares by accounts at various firms after the MOC Imbalance was broadcast on August 11 and the opening price on August 12, 2004 for RY of $60.74 and for BMO of $52.95.
16 RBC DS has agreed to make restitution in the amount of $231, to the market participants affected by these trades within 30 days of the approval of this Settlement Agreement. III. CONCLUSION 55. The Respondents knew when Limit MOC orders in RY and BMO shares were entered into the MOC Facility that any ensuing unintentional crosses would likely result in trades with no change of beneficial ownership. This is in fact what did occur, contrary to UMIR 2.2(1) and 2.2(2)(b). 56. The Respondents effected these wash trades in the shares of RY and BMO with knowledge about the facts behind the MOC Imbalance that were not generally known in the marketplace. It was only known to the parties (the Respondents, Dealer Y and Bank A). The Respondents trading was not conducted on a level playing field of information with other market participants. 57. The Respondents agree that they should not have acted without consulting RS to mitigate potential liability. 58. The Respondents agree that they should have contacted RS for direction as soon as they learned the reason behind the MOC Imbalance. This would have allowed for the opportunity for RS to consider what course of action was in the best interests of a fair and orderly market. 59. It should also be noted that the impugned trades constitute an isolated incident resulting initially from an error of another Dealer. The Respondents did not engage in a pattern of manipulative or deceptive conduct. They admitted their error to RS upon being contacted immediately following the subject trades. 60. None of the Respondents has ever before been the subject of discipline proceedings by any securities regulator. 61. None of the Respondents benefited personally from this trading.
17 The Respondents were acting in a very compressed timeframe to address a serious problem created by another dealer s error. 63. By effecting these trades contrary to UMIR Rules 2.2(1) and 2.2(2)(b), the Respondents engaged in conduct for which they are liable pursuant to UMIR 10.4(1)(a). They failed to consider that they were putting the interests of RBC DS ahead of the best interests of a fair and orderly market. July 25, 2005 Market Regulation Services Inc. Suite 900, Box King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8 Investigations and Enforcement Telephone: Facsimile: TO: The Respondents c/o David Hausman Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP TD Bank Tower Suite 4200, 66 Wellington St. W. Toronto Dominion Centre Toronto, Ontario M5K 1N6 Telephone: (416) Facsimile: (416)
18 SCHEDULE A Page 1 of 1 Excerpts from the Universal Market Integrity Rules 1.0 Manipulative or Deceptive Method of Trading (1) A Participant or Access Person shall not, directly or indirectly, use nor knowingly facilitate nor participate in the use of any manipulative or deceptive method of trading in connection with the entry of an order or orders to trade on a marketplace for the purchase or sale of any security which creates or which could reasonably be expected to create a false or misleading appearance of trading activity or an artificial price for the security or a related security. (1) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the following activities when undertaken on a marketplace constitute deceptive and manipulative methods of trading: ( ) effecting a trade in a security which involves no change in the beneficial or economic ownership Extension of Restrictions (1) A related entity of a Participant and a director, officer, partner or employee of the Participant or a related entity of the Participant shall: (a) comply with the provisions of these Rules and any Policies with respect to just and equitable principles of trade, manipulative and deceptive method of trading, short sales and frontrunning as if references to Participant in Rules 2.1, 2.2, 3.1 and 4.1 included reference to such person; and..
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND INTERACTIVE BROKERS
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-002 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationRe Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc
Re Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc IN THE MATTER OF: The Market Integrity Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The Universal Market Integrity Rules and Credit Suisse
More informationMarch 11, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF RHONDA HYMERS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement March 11, 2004 2004-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF RHONDA HYMERS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION 1. Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA. December 20, 2006 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance
Notice to Public Contested Hearing December 20, 2006 No. 2006-010 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA Relevant UMIR Provisions 2.2 Manipulative and Deceptive Method
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING. Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. Northern Securities Inc., Victor Alboini, and Christopher Shaule. October 20, 2005 No.
Notice to Public Contested Hearing October 20, 2005 No. 2005-012 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance Northern Securities Inc., Victor Alboini, and Christopher Shaule Relevant UMIR Provisions
More informationRe Interactive Brokers Canada
Unofficial English Translation IN THE MATTER OF: Re Interactive Brokers Canada The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The Universal Market Integrity
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., JEAN-PIERRE DE MONTIGNY AND JEAN-LUC BRUNET
Settlement Agreement March 16, 2005 2005-002 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., JEAN-PIERRE DE MONTIGNY AND JEAN-LUC BRUNET OFFER OF
More informationRe Savard. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada
Unofficial English Translation Re Savard IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Michel
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. April 7, 2008 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS
Notice to Public Contested Hearing April 7, 2008 No. 2008-004 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS Relevant UMIR Provisions 8.1 [Client-Principal Trading] Summary Commencing on
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC. SCOTT MORTIMER AND CARL IRIZAWA
Settlement Agreement December 21, 2004 2004-008 Certain sections of this Settlement Agreement are redacted for privacy purposes. All redactions were approved by the RS Hearing Panel that approved this
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HAMPTON SECURITIES LTD. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationRS Market Integrity Notice Notice of Amendment Approval Provisions Respecting Manipulative and Deceptive Activities
13.1.3 RS Market Integrity Notice Notice of Amendment Approval Provisions Respecting Manipulative and Deceptive Activities April 1, 2005 Summary NOTICE OF AMENDMENT APPROVAL PROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE
More informationMANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES
January 30, 2004 No. 2004-003 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationAugust 18, IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Offer of Settlement August 18, 2003 2003-006 IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Staff of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND JOHN SHANE MACEACHERN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I.
More informationPROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES
August 13, 2004 No. 2004-017 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS PROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation
More informationUniversal Market Integrity Rules Rules & Policies. 2.2 Manipulative and Deceptive Activities
Universal Market Integrity Rules Rules & Policies 2.2 Manipulative and Deceptive Activities (1) A Participant or Access Person shall not, directly or indirectly, engage in or participate in the use of
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY
IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY Heard: May 1, 2006 Decision: May 10, 2006 Hearing Panel: Eric Spink, Chair Kathleen Jost William
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND - IN THE MATTER OF ZHEN (STEVEN) PANG and OASIS WORLD TRADING INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the Respondent s conduct.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND RICHARD STANFORD SMITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I.
More informationTEXT OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
TEXT OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions In these Rules, unless the subject matter or context otherwise requires: Access Person means a person
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND PORTFOLIO STRATEGIES SECURITIES INC. SETTLEMENT
More informationUnofficial English Translation
Unofficial English Translation IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND REMO COSTA STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS Further to a Notice of Hearing dated December
More informationPOLICY 6.4 TRADES TO BE ON A MARKETPLACE
Universal Market Integrity Rules Rules & Policies 6.4 Trades to be on a Marketplace A Participant acting as principal or agent may not trade nor participate in a trade in a security by means other than
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF MARK STEVEN ROTSTEIN AND EQUILIBRIUM PARTNERS INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationAmendments Respecting Trading Supervision Obligations
Rules Notice Notice of Approval/Implementation UMIR Please distribute internally to: Institutional Legal and Compliance Senior Management Trading Desk Retail Contact: Sanka Kasturiarachchi Policy Counsel,
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND MARTIN WENDALL MATTHEWS AND ARNOLD WARD FRANCIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ROLAND PAPP NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More information2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation into Mackie s conduct (the Investigation ).
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND MACKIE RESEARCH CAPITAL CORPORATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND NICHOLAS KARAKOLIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationPART 7 TRADING IN A MARKETPLACE
Universal Market Integrity Rules Rules & Policies PART 7 TRADING IN A MARKETPLACE 7.1 Trading Supervision Obligations (1) Each Participant shall adopt written policies and procedures to be followed by
More informationRe: ROBERT SCOTT RITCHIE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA PACIFIC DISTRICT COUNCIL Re: ROBERT SCOTT RITCHIE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Panel: Appearances: Leon
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND KEVIN FREDERICK PRICE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DUNCAN ROY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationTSX Inc. Notice of Approval Amendments to the Rules of the TSX to Permit Trading of Securities Listed on Other Canadian Exchanges TSX INC.
13.2.2 TSX Inc. Notice of Approval Amendments to the Rules of the TSX to Permit Trading of Securities Listed on Other Canadian Exchanges Introduction TSX INC. NOTICE OF APPROVAL AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ULA HARTNER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationTSX VENTURE EXCHANGE RULE BOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS
TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE RULE BOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule A. 1.00 Interpretation... 1 A1.01 Definitions... 1 A1.02 Rules of Construction:...12 A1.03 Interpretation Not Affected by Division, Heading, etc:...12
More informationJAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The
More information5. Staff and the Respondent jointly recommend that the District Council accept this Settlement Agreement.
BULLETIN NO. IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: JORY CAPITAL INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment
More informationTD Exchange-Traded Funds. Distribution Reinvestment Plan
TD Exchange-Traded Funds Distribution Reinvestment Plan 1. Introduction Each TD Exchange-Traded Fund ("TD ETF", or collectively, "TD ETFs") as listed in Schedule A has established this distribution reinvestment
More informationRULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND EFFECT
RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND EFFECT 1.1. In these Rules unless the context otherwise requires, the expression: Affiliate or Affiliated Corporation where used to indicate a relationship between two corporations,
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND SCOTIA CAPITAL INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Shaun Wayne Howell.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5 AS AMENDED. - and - IN THE MATTER OF ZHEN (STEVEN) PANG and OASIS WORLD TRADING INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationRe Watts DECISION AND REASONS
Re Watts IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and John Phillip Watts 2016 IIROC 28 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c.s.5, as amended. - and - CI MUTUAL FUNDS INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c.s.5, as amended - and - CI MUTUAL FUNDS INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. By Notice of Hearing dated December 12, 2004, the Ontario Securities
More informationRe Industrial Alliance Securities
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Industrial Alliance Securities The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. 2014 IIROC 57 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationMarch 7,
March 7, 2002 2002-061 UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES Background On December 1, 2001, National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation (the Marketplace Operation Instrument ) and National Instrument
More informationPROSPECTUS. Initial Public Offering October 27, Dividend Select. $250,000,000 (Maximum) 25,000,000 Shares
No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION. Jean P. Whittow, Q.C. Chilwin C.
IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION Hearing Panel: Chair Industry Member Industry Member Counsel For Market Regulation Services: Counsel For
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ANDY HYON CHUL KIM NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More information5OCT $125,000,004 (maximum) (maximum 10,416,667 Combined Units) $12.00 per Combined Unit
No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and - CI INVESTMENTS INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More information2011 BCSECCOM 197. Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin. Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c.
Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Hearing and Review Panel Brent W. Aitken Bradley Doney Don Rowlatt Vice Chair Commissioner
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 22 nd Floor CP 55, 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationCANADIAN UNLISTED BOARD INC. USER AGREEMENT. (the Agreement )
CANADIAN UNLISTED BOARD INC. USER AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) WHEREAS the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc. ("CDNX" or the "Exchange") has entered into an agreement with the Toronto Stock Exchange Inc. ("TSE")
More informationIN THE MATTER OF VOLKMAR GUIDO HABLE. REASONS AND DECISION (Subsections 127(1) and 127(10) of the Securities Act, RSO 1990, c S.5)
Ontario Securities Commission Commission des valeurs mobilières de l Ontario 22nd Floor 20 Queen Street West Toronto ON M5H 3S8 22e étage 20, rue queen ouest Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Citation: Hable (Re), 2018
More informationRE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationMarket Policy Notice. General LAUNCH DATE FOR TRADING LISTED SECURITIES ON OMEGA ATS. November 23, 2007 No
Market Policy Notice General November 23, 2007 No. 2007-008 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance Key Topics Omega ATS Continuous Auction Market Multiple Marketplaces Best Price Obligation Short
More informationRE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING I. BACKGROUND IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More information$150,000,000 (Maximum) 6,000,000 Preferred Shares and 6,000,000 Class A Shares
No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. The securities offered by this prospectus have not been and will not be registered
More informationMarket Integrity Notice Guidance
Market Integrity Notice Guidance August 10, 2007 No. 2007-015 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance Key Topics Artificial Price Best Execution Best Price Obligation Designated Offshore Securities
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DAVID EDWARD SLOAN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationPROSPECTUS March 30, 2009 INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING. TRIDENT PERFORMANCE CORP. II Offering of Class A Shares
No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those
More informationRe IPC Securities REASONS FOR DECISION
Re IPC Securities IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and IPC Securities Corporation 2016 IIROC 32 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DARYL MICHAEL REBECK SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationUniversal Market Integrity Rules STATUS OF AMENDMENTS
Universal Market Integrity s STATUS OF AMENDMENTS The following table lists the status of all of the amendments which have been proposed or made to a or of the Universal Market Integrity s ( UMIR ) since
More informationRe Dariotis and Fiumidinisi
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Dariotis and Fiumidinisi The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Konstantine
More informationNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT Matter Nos &
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT Matter Nos. 201.6-11-00010 & 2018-06-00084 TO: RE: New York Stock Exchange LLC Peter Mancuso & Co., L.P., Respondent CRD No. 33095
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE HENRY COLE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HENRY COLE NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationNOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS TIMBERCREEK GLOBAL REAL ESTATE INCOME FUND
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS OF TIMBERCREEK GLOBAL REAL ESTATE INCOME FUND To be held on Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange
Decision June 12, 2003 2003-002 IN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange AND IN THE MATTER OF
More informationRE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into Cole s conduct.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HENRY COLE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND WILLIAM RICHARD BOOTH BELL WRIGHT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Enforcement
More information11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017
ISSUED IIROC Nation^Weafing Coordinator 11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization ot Canada Organisme canadien de reglementalion du commerce des v.ileurs mobilieres IN THE MATTER
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND CHRISTOPHER RUTLEDGE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationORDER ENTRY DURING A REGULATORY HALT
April 16, 2004 No. 2004-010 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ORDER ENTRY DURING A REGULATORY HALT Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation Services Inc. (
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment Dealers
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More informationAGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS
Agreed Statement of Facts File No. 201434 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Yan Feng Li (also known
More informationDecision on Settlement Agreement
Unofficial English Translation Re Béland In the matter of: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Alain
More informationKINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA MARKET CONDUCT REGULATIONS
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA MARKET CONDUCT REGULATIONS English Translation of the Official Arabic Text Issued by the Board of the Capital Market Authority Pursuant to its Resolution Number 1-11-2004 Dated
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED (the Act ) - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND KURT ANDREW HALLER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationRe Assante Capital Management REASONS FOR DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Assante Capital Management The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Assante Capital Management Ltd. 2015 IIROC 44 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationRe Elue. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) 2014 IIROC 39
Re Elue IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) and Afam Elue 2014 IIROC 39 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationELECTION ON DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY BY A PARTNERSHIP TO A TAXABLE CANADIAN CORPORATION
ELECTION ON DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY BY A PARTNERSHIP TO A TAXABLE CANADIAN CORPORATION For use by a taxable Canadian corporation and all the members of a partnership, to jointly elect under subsection
More informationTEXT OF POLICIES UNDER THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES POLICY 2.1 JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES
TEXT OF POLICIES UNDER THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES POLICY 2.1 JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES Part 1 Examples of Unacceptable Activity Rule 2.1 provides that a Participant shall transact business
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MANAS DICHOW SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MANAS DICHOW SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment
More informationSECOND AMENDING AGREEMENT TO INTERCOMPANY LOAN AGREEMENT
SECOND AMENDING AGREEMENT TO INTERCOMPANY LOAN AGREEMENT THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT TO INTERCOMPANY LOAN AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is dated as of this 26 th day of July, 2018. BETWEEN: TD Covered Bond (Legislative)
More information