Retirement and Cognitive Decline: Evidence from Global Aging Data
|
|
- Myles Hoover
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Retirement and Cognitive Decline: Evidence from Global Aging Data Hiroyuki Motegi Yoshinori Nishimura Masato Oikawa This version: February 15, 2016 Abstract This paper analyses the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in two ways. First, we analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function using cross-country variation of pension eligibility age. This method is used in some literatures. The results suggest that the country heterogeneity largely influences the estimated result. The estimated results can lead to precisely the opposite interpretation depending on the analysed countries. We show that the cross-country estimation is not appropriate when we analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. Second, we analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in the U.S. by controlling individual heterogeneity and endogeneity of the retirement behavior. Our estimates indicate that the retirement has a weak e ect on cognitive function just after retirement. However, the negative e ect of retirement on cognitive function becomes stronger as the retirement duration is getting longer. The disincentive of investing cognitive asset becomes stronger as elderly people become closer to the end of life cycle. JEL Classification Numbers: I10, I12, J24, J26 Keywords: mental retirement, cognitive function, social security, pension eligibility age, crosscountry instruments, global aging data Graduate School of Economics, the University of Tokyo, Japan. motegihiro@gmail.com Graduate School of Economics, the University of Tokyo, Japan. nishimura.yy@gmail.com Graduate School of Economics, the University of Tokyo, Japan. masato.oikawa1991@gmail.com 1
2 1 Introduction The retirement related policy such as a reform of pension system has become important in developed countries to sustain social security system. Many developed countries have faced the same problems of decreasing birthrate and an ing population. As a population ages, the cost of social security and social welfare increases, eroding the country s budget. Many developed countries have reformed pension system to reduce the cost of social security and social welfare. Many developed countries such as the United States, England and Korea have already decided to increase pension eligibility age for some next decades. Japan has already increased pension eligibility age. Pension reforms in developed countries are expected to delay the retirement. When policy makers evaluate the e ect of these reforms, health is a key factor to evaluate the e ect of these policy changes. If working is good for the health of elderly people, it would lead to reductions in medical expenses. However, if working is bad for the health of elderly people, it would lead to increase of medical expenses. Along the growing interest of the e ect of the policies which delay the retirement of elderly people, a number of studies have investigated the relation between retirement and health over the last two decades. 1 In various health indexes, many researchers have examined the relationship between health and retirement. Kerkhofs and Lindeboom (1997) is one of the first papers which suggested endogeneous decision between retirement and health and shed light on the e ect of retirement on health as far as we know. They find that Hopkins Symptom Cheklist (HSCL), which is a health index, can be improved after early retirement in the Netherlands by applying fixed e ect methods. Lindeboom et al. (2002) extends the Kerkhofs and Lindeboom (1997) to other indices such as MMSE (test on cognitive ability), CES-D (test of depressing feelings) and others and applying fixed e ect methods to Dutch data which is di erent from that of Kerkhofs and Lindeboom (1997). Charles (2004) is also one of the first investigations which analyse the causal e ect of retirement on health focusing on subjective well being (SWB) in economic literatures by using instrumental variables. In addition, there are many literatures which study the e ect of retirement on various health indexes. Bound and Waidmann (2007), Coe and Lindeboom (2008), Dave et al. (2008), Neuman (2008), Johnston and Lee (2009), Latif (2011), Coe and Zamarro (2011), Behncke (2012), Bonsang et al. (2012), Mazzonna and Peracchi (2012), Hernaes et al. (2013), Bingley and Martinello (2013), Hashimoto (2013), Insler (2014), Kajitani et al. (2014) and Hashimoto (2015) are other representative papers. There are, however, no unifying views about the impact of retirement on various health indexes. Some studies conclude that retirement has an positive impact on health defined as mental health or physical health, but other studies conclude that retirement has no or negative e ect. In addition, these results depends on characteristics such as sex and education. While the controversial discussion has continued with respect to the estimated results of the various health indexes, the discussion about the e ects of retirement on cognitive function is no exception. In the literatures analysing the e ect of retirement on cognitive function, a controversial discussion has also continued. Adam et al. (2006) confirm the positive e ect of 1 We omit the literatures about the e ect of health on retirement. The representative paper is McGarry (2004). 2
3 occupational activities on the cognitive function of elderly people in Europe. Rohwedder and Willis (2010) discuss the hypothesis to explain why retirement behaviour decreases cognitive function and they show the negative relationship between retirement and cognitive function by using an elementary regression analysis. However, they do not control basic elements such as age and education. Bingley and Martinello (2013) re-examine the estimated model used by Rohwedder and Willis (2010) adding only years of education variable and gender variable. They conclude that their estimated negative e ect is weaker than the estimated result by Rohwedder and Willis (2010). This implies that we should include the controlled characteristics into the model estimated by Rohwedder and Willis (2010). Furthermore, Coe and Zamarro (2011) find no clear relationship between retirement and cognitive function in Europe. Coe et al. (2012) also find no clear general relationship between retirement duration and cognitive function. 2 On the other hand, Mazzonna and Peracchi (2012) find a negative relationship between retirement duration and cognitive function in Europe. Bonsang et al. (2012) also find a negative relationship between retirement and cognitive function although they control only age factors. Depending on the specifications, the negative relationship disappear. Kajitani et al. (2014) suggests the existence of the heterogeneity of cognitive deterioration depending on the characteristics of occupational type. The goal of this paper is to examine the controversial hypothesis that there exists causal e ect of retirement on cognitive function. We examine two points. First, we examine the influence of country heterogeneity and other heterogeneities on the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. This analysis re-examines the literatures using cross country instruments (e.g. Rohwedder and Willis (2010) and Bingley and Martinello (2013)). Second, we reexamine the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in the U.S. We pay attention to some aspects of heterogeneity of individual characteristics, the heterogeneity of retirement stages (just after retirement or comparatively long time after retirement) and the heterogeneity of the time consumed in leisure time. These are all remaining works or important works remained which the related studies do not analyse. The rest of this paper is arranged as follows. Section 2 describes the data. Section 3 discusses the heterogeneity of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. Section 4 discusses our estimation methods, identification strategies and the estimated results. Section 5 concludes this research and discusses future extensions. 2 Data This paper uses the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS) 3 and other sister datasets such as the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the English Longitudinal Survey on ing (ELSA), the Survey on Health, ing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), and the Japanese Study of ing and Retirement (JSTAR). They are panel surveys of elderly people aged 50 or older. These family datasets are constructed so that the 2 They find a positive relationship between retirement duration and cognitive function only for blue-collar workers. 3 See the website ( if you want to know the detail of the HRS. 3
4 questions of the HRS are reproduced in those of other studies as much as possible. We analyse the e ect of cognitive function in two ways. In the first analysis, we utilise cross-sectional cross-country variation of pension eligibility age. In this analysis, we use the datasets of the HRS, the ELSA and the SHARE at 2004 and we also use the datasets of the HRS, the SHARE, the ELSA at 2010 including the CHARLS at 2011 and the JSTAR at We cannot use the Korean Longitudinal Study of ing (KLoSA) because the questions with respect to word recall are not comparable with other sister datasets. The reason why we use the JSTAR at 2009 is that the survey year is nearest to other studies at 2010 and the questions of word recall of the JSTAR at 2009 are asked to all respondents. The questions of word recall of the JSTAR at 2011 are asked to only people aged more than 65. As a result, we use the JSTAR at In second analysis, we utilise both the di erence in pension eligibility age among di erent cohorts in the U.S. and the long-term variation of retirement behaviour. We use only HRS from wave 3 (at 1996) to Wave 10 (at 2010) in the second analysis. They include a rich variety of variables to capture living aspects in terms of economic status, health status, family background, as well as social and work status. We mainly use the harmonised datasets. 4 However, when variables are not available in the harmonised datasets, we use the variables of the original datasets. We use the cognitive function score in the HRS and other sister datasets. In the HRS, we use the scores of Immediate Word Recall, Delayed Word Recall, Serial7 s, Backwards Counting and Word Recall Summary Score. Word Recall Summary Score is the sum of Immediate Word Recall and Delayed Word Recall, which is the score between 0 and 20. In the section 4.2, we use Word Recall Summary Score in all datasets. In the section 4.3 and 4.4, we use all types of scores in the HRS. The Immediate word recall and delayed word recall tests asks the respondent to recall as many words as possible in a list of 10 words. The score of Immediate word recall and delayed word recall are the number of words from 10 word list that were recalled correctly. The Serial7 s test asks the respondent to subtract 7 from the prior number beginning with 100 for five trials. The score of Serial7 s test is between 0 and 5. The Backwards Counting test asks the respondent to count backwards for 10 continuous numbers from 20. The original score of The Backwards Counting is 2 if successful on the first try, 1 if successful on the second, and 0 if not successful on either try. However, we make the indicator which is equal to one when the respondent is successful on the first try. We use only this indicator suggesting whether the respondent succeed on the first try. 5 We summarise the cognitive function scores in the Table 1 and Table 2. In the Table 1, we show the descriptive statistics of the age group from 60 to 64 in all countries and the descriptive statistics of the U.S. in the Table 2. According to Table 1, the cognition cores are not the 4 The Gateway to Global Aging Data ( provides harmonised versions of data from the international ing and retirement studies (e.g.hrs, ELSA, SHARE, KLoSA, CHARLS). All variables of each dataset aimed to have the same items and follow the same naming conventions. The harmonised datasets enable researchers to conduct cross-national comparative studies. The program code to generate the harmonised datasets from the original datasets is provided by the Center for Global ing Research, USC Davis School of Gerontology and the Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR). Some variables, such as measures of assets and income, are imputed by this code. 5 We make the indicator suggesting whether the respondent succeed on the first try because we cannot interpret the estimated coe cient on the original score. 4
5 same level in all countries. 6 All scores in China and European countries are comparatively low compared to other countries. In Table 2, we show the descriptive statistics in the U.S. In Table 2, we can observe the intuitive characteristics of cognitive function. Female people have higher score than male people in Word Recall Score and male people have higher score than female people in Serial 7 s. Highly educated people have higher score than low educated people in all cognition scores. Table 1: Summary Statistics of Cognition Scores (:60-64) at 2010 Obs. Mean S.D. Min Max HRS Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s ELSA 1 Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall SHARE Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s JSTAR Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s CHARLS Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s KLoSA Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s : No Serial 7 s Score in ELSA. 2 : KLoSAs Word Recall Scores are not comparable with other dataset. We will explain the pensionable age used in this paper. We use the pensionable age when we produce our instrumental variables. We do the cross-sectional cross-country in the section 4.2. Here, we use the pensionable age in all countries which we analyse. Rohwedder and Willis 6 The maximum score of KLoSA at each test is di erent from other countries. 5
6 Table 2: Summary Statistics: The U.S. (:60-64) at 2010 Obs. Mean S.D. Min Max Obs. Mean S.D. Min Max Male Female Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s LTU Univ. Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s White Blue Word Recall Sum. Score Immediate Word Recall Delayed Word Recall Serial 7 s (2010) and Bingley and Martinello (2013) also do the cross-sectional cross-country analysis and use the pensionable age based on the source from Pensions at a Glance (OECD) and Social Security Programs throughout the World: Europe, However, the pensionable ages in some countries are partly incorrect. We correct these incorrect pensionable ages. We explain this point in Appendix. We also search for the pensionable ages at 2010 of all countries analysed in this paper. In the section 4.3 and 4.4, we use the pensionable age in the U.S. We use the early retirement age and the full retirement age of the U.S. in the section 4.3 and Retirement and Cognitive Function Decline The main target of this paper is to discuss the heterogeneity of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. We would like to discuss this point in this section. We focus on the influence of the country heterogeneity and the individual characteristics heterogeneity on cognitive scores. We will discuss the influence of these heterogeneities depending on the retirement definitions used in the related studies. We show the di erence of the average cognitive function scores between retired people and not retired people. In Figure 3.1, we show the di erence of the average cognitive scores between retired people and not retired people in di erent country. We show the average scores of the Serial 7 s test and the Word Recall Summary in the U.S., The U.K., China, German, Italy and Hungary at We use the two di erent definition of retire in Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2. Not work for pay means that a respondent is not working not for pay at This is the first definition of retire. SR-Retire means that a respondent reports a retired status. We use the r@retemp variable in each Harmonised Data (e.g. Harmonised SHARE, Harmonised ELSA) which is constructed based on the RAND HRS data when we define the retirement status. If the 6
7 Figure 3.1: The Serial 7 s Score and The Word Recall Summary Score By Country at 2010 (Only China: at 2011) Not work for pay Serial 7's Score US China Germany SR-Retire Serial 7's Score US China Germany Italy Hungary Italy Hungary Not Graphs by country Not Graphs by country Not work for pay Word Recall Summary Score SR-Retire Word Recall Summary Score US UK China US UK China Germany Italy Hungary Germany Italy Hungary Not Not Graphs by country Graphs by country variable r@retemp is the value of one or two, we define that a respondent retire at 7 This is the second definition of retire. Many related studies (e.g. Rohwedder and Willis (2010), Coe and Zamarro (2011), Bonsang et al. (2012), Bingley and Martinello (2013)) use the two definitions of retirement. Generally speaking, the di erence in the cognitive score between retired people and not retired people is very small in all countries. In Figure 3.1, we can observe the di erence in characteristics of some countries depending on the definition of retirement. For example, with respect to the serial 7 s score in the U.S., the score of people based on the definition Not work for pay is lower than Not people based on the definition Not work for pay. On the other hand, the score of people based on the definition reports a retired status is higher than Not people based on the definition reports a retired 7 See the codebook of the Rand HRS data if you want to know the detail of the variable r@retemp which we use. They explain how they construct the variable r@retemp in p We use the variable r@retemp in all Harmonised Data Sets. 7
8 Figure 3.2: The Serial 7 s Score and The Word Recall Summary Score in The U.S. at 2010 By Education Level, Gender and Occupational Type Not work for pay Serial 7's Score SR-Retire Serial 7's Score Male LTU White Male LTU White Not Female Not Univ Not Blue Not Female Not Univ Not Blue Not Not Not Not Not Not Not work for pay Word Recall Summary Score SR-Retire Word Recall Summary Score Male LTU White Male LTU White Not Female Not Univ Not Blue Not Not Female Not Univ Blue Not Not Not Not Not Not status. Depending on the definition of retirement, the average score is di erent between and Not. In China, people have higher score than Not Retied people depending on the self reported retirement status. Depending on the definition of retirement and the di erence of country, the cognitive function score has a heterogeneous relationship between and Not. There is no general relationship between the cognitive function score of and Not. In the U.S., Serial 7 s score is di erent between and Not. However, Word Recall Summary Score is not so much di erent between and Not. In Hungary, both Serial 7 s score and Word Recall Summary Score is di erent between and Not. Figure 3.2 shows the cognitive function score in the U.S. between and Not depending on the individual characteristics. In Figure 3.2, there is also the di erence depending on the retirement definition which is not ignorable. Serial 7 s score has a di erent characteristics between and Not depending on the retirement definition. According to the self-reported retirement status (The right figure named ), there is only a small gap between and Not in all categories (e.g. Gender, 8
9 Education Level). On the other hand, there is a large gap between and Not depending on the definition Not work for pay. In contrast, Word Recall Summary Score do not have a largely di erent characteristics between and Not depending on the retirement definition. In all categories, the gap between and Not is large with respect to Serial 7 s score. With respect or Serial 7 s, there is large gap between and Not depending on the di erence of Educational Level, Gender and Occupational Type. As we can observe in Figure 3.1 and 3.2, we should pay attention to the following points in this paper. (1) The country heterogeneity is not ignorable. (2) The definition of retirement sometimes largely influences the di erence between and to. (3) In the U.S., the individual characteristics is important with respect to Serial 7 s score. 4 Analysis Framework and Results Some related literatures (Rohwedder and Willis (2010), Coe and Zamarro (2011), Bingley and Martinello (2013)) have analysed the e ect of retirement on cognitive function by using the cross-country variation of pension eligibility age. On the other hand, some studies (Bonsang et al. (2012), Coe et al. (2012)) have also analysed the e ect of retirement on cognitive function focusing on the retirement duration by using the HRS. We would like to show that it is di cult to examine the e ect of retirement on cognitive function by the identification strategy to use the cross-country variation of pension eligibility age. We find that the country heterogeneity largely influences the estimated result of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. We consider that we should analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in only one country. In the first analysis, we want to discuss this point. In the second analysis, we will analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function only in the U.S. considering the heterogeneity of individual characteristics. 4.1 Identification Strategy We analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. The target of our identification strategies is to exclude the endogeneity bias on the coe cient of retirement variable as much as possible. We analyse the e ect of retirement of cognitive function in two di erent ways. In the first analysis, we analyse cross-sectional cross-country analysis. When we do this analysis, the identification strategy is to use the variation of pension eligibility ages among di erent countries at a specific year (cross-sectional cross-country analysis). Rohwedder and Willis (2010) analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in this way. We examine the discussion by Rohwedder and Willis (2010) in this paper. When we analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in this way, the problem of this cross-country cross-sectional analysis is that the results are not robust when we change the specification or analysis year. Once we consider unobserved or observed heterogeneity, the results are heterogeneous. We consider that we cannot derive a general conclusion on the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. Rohwedder and Willis (2010) use the pension eligibility ages based on external data 9
10 sources. 8 We investigate again whether the pension eligibility ages in the analysed countries are correct. We make a modification on the pension eligibility ages which Rohwedder and Willis (2010) use. We explain the detail in the next section. According to our analysis, the e ect of retirement on cognitive function is heterogeneous in di erent countries. We should analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in each country because it is possible that the e ects of retirement on cognitive function are heterogeneous among di erent countries. We choose the U.S. to estimate the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in our analysis because the U.S. has two good properties. In the second analysis, we use the dynamic variation of retirement behaviour on cognitive function. When we analyse the U.S., The first good property is that the HRS has enough waves to analyse the long-term e ect of retirement on cognitive function. The second good property is that we get enough information with respect to leisure time activity. The HRS collects the Consumption and Activities Mail Survey (CAMS). The section A of the CAMS explains that The activities component of the CAMS allows for describing activity patterns and permits the investigation of di erent types of activities and how specific types of activities are a ected by health, family, and economic transitions in later life and, in turn, how activities a ect health and well-being. 9 We use the CAMS data of the time consumed in leisure time of a respondent before retirement and after retirement. Figure 4.1 shows the targets of our analysis describing the goal of each section. We separate our analysis into two parts after the section 4.2. In the first part, we analyse the e ect of the transition from work status to retirement status on cognitive function (short retirement duration analysis). In the second half, we analyse the e ect of retirement duration on cognitive function scores (long retirement duration analysis). In the U.S., we can get enough variation of pension eligibility age among di erent cohorts. This variation of pension eligibility age among di erent cohorts are useful to estimate our model using a panel data. When we do this analysis in the section 4.3 and 4.4, the identification strategy is to use the variation of pension eligibility ages among di erent cohorts at the U.S. We use the panel data from wave 1996 to wave Finally, we would like to describe some notes. We would like to stress the importance of the heterogeneity of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. We only analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in the U.S. Therefore, we will not intend to derive the general conclusion with respect to the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. When we change analysis country, it is possible that the result in this paper would be di erent and vice versa. Of course, we can analyse the e ect on retirement on cognitive function at other countries except the U.S. if we can utilise the data variation to identify the e ect of retirement on cognitive function and a panel dataset with enough number of waves to analyse the long-term e ect of retirement on cognitive function. In Korea and other some European countries, pension eligibility ages have already decided to increase. When we can use a panel data with enough number of waves including respondents who have di erent pension eligibility age in these countries, we can analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function 8 They use the source from Pensions at a Glance (OECD) and Social Security Programs throughout the World: Europe, See the website if you want to know the detail. 10
11 in these countries. We would like to expect the future work considering the importance of the heterogeneity of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in the countries except the U.S. Cogni,ve Func,on Figure 4.1: The Analysis Targets (Target 1) Sec,on 4.3: Short Re,rement Dura,on Analysis Work (Target 2) Sec,on 4.4: Long Re,rement Dura,on Analysis Not Work Re,rement 4.2 Validation Analysis on Cross-sectional Cross-country Analysis Analysis Framework Rohwedder and Willis (2010) estimate the following model. They use the HRS, the SHARE and the ELSA at They restrict the analysed sample between age 60 and age 64. As you see, they do not control any variable. notwork i is a indicator which is equal to one when arespondentisnotworkingforpayatthesurveyyear. cognition score i is a score of word recall question (minimum 0, maximum 20). age i is the variable which is a respondent s age. cognition score i = notwork i + 1i (1) notwork i = {age i A eb i } + 2 1{age i A fb i } + 2i A eb i :theearlyretirementbenefiteligibilityage A fb i :thefullretirementbenefiteligibilityage We control some other control variables. Bingley and Martinello (2013) estimate the same model as (1) additionally including only years of schooling variable. However, it is not enough 11
12 to control only educational characteristics based on the discussion of section 3. We estimate the following model considering the heterogeneity of a respondent s cognitive function. cognition score i = notwork i + 0 x i + 1i (2) notwork i = {age i A eb i } + 2 1{age i A fb i } + 0 x i + 2i A eb i :theearlyretirementbenefiteligibilityage A fb i :thefullretirementbenefiteligibilityage In the model (1), the individual characteristics x i are unobserved. These characteristics x i, which are the source of the di erence of cognitive function and also can correlate with the variable networki, can change the final conclusion. As we discuss in the next section, we find three points in this framework. The e ect of other control variables cannot be ignorable and the magnitude with respect to the e ect of retirement on cognitive function are small compared to the related literatures. We sum up this point in the section 5. We also examine the e ect of changing the analysed sample (e.g. changing the analysed countries). The e ect of changing the analysed sample is not also ignorable. This suggests that the e ects of retirement on cognitive function are also heterogeneous among di erent groups. The instrumental variables which we correct does not so much influence the final results of Rohwedder and Willis (2010) and Bingley and Martinello (2013). The e ect of correcting the instrumental variables is weak. We explain in detail these points in the next section Results First, we restrict the sample aged from 60 to 64 following Rohwedder and Willis (2010) and Bingley and Martinello (2013). We examine the e ect of including the other control variables and changing the instrumental variables (Table 3). The columns of IV1 means the analysis results when we use the instrumental variables used by Rohwedder and Willis (2010) and Bingley and Martinello (2013). The columns of IV2 means the analysis results when we use the our own instrumental variables in section 2.2. We present the result of OLS when the DWH test is not rejected in the specification to use the instrumental variables. When the DWH test is rejected, we support the result of the OLS. The column (1) in Table 3 is the result of the same specification in Rohwedder and Willis (2010). The column (3) in Table 3 is the result of the same specification in Bingley and Martinello (2013). 10 The column (2) 10 Bingley and Martinello (2013) impute the value of the years of schooling of the ELSA. However, we do not impute the value of the years of schooling of the ELSA. We omit the sample of the ELSA in the column (3) in Table 1. 12
13 in Table 3 is the result of the specification only changing the variable of education in Bingley and Martinello (2013). We also check the e ect of the di erence in the education variables on the e ect of the estimated coe cients in the columns (2) and (3). Form the column (4) to the column (6), we add some basic characteristics variables which Rohwedder and Willis (2010) and Bingley and Martinello (2013) do not include. For example, in the columns (4), we add country dummies into the specification (3). In the columns (5) and (6), we add the other characteristics variables into the specification (4). The are some important properties in Table 3. The Di erence in the Instrumental Variables: The e ect of changing the instrumental variables gradually influences the value of the coe cients more as we add other characteristics variables. However, the e ect is not large when we compare the specifications between IV1 and IV2. In the specifications (5) and (6), the results of the OLS are almost the same. In the specifications from (1) to (4), the magnitude of the coe cients are not di erent so much. The specification (1), which is the same specification of Rohwedder and Willis (2010), reports a small di erence between IV1 and IV2. In the specification (3) (IV2), the coe cient is not significant while the coe cient of the specification (3) (IV1) is significant. In other specifications, the e ect is weak. The Di erence in the Control Variables: When we include the country dummies, the change in the magnitude of the coe cients are very large. When we compare the specifications (2) and (4), the sign of the coe cients changes in the opposite direction. Finally, the direction of the coe cient is negative in the specification (6) while the absolute value of the coe cient is very small (the OLS result in the specification (6):-0.459). The value of the coe cients of the specification (2) is (IV2). As a result, the omitted variable bias is very large in the specification (2). The country s heterogeneity of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function is very large. In Table 3, we can find that the e ect of the country s heterogeneity is not weak. In the specification (6), the coe cients of Spain (the OLS:-2.233) or Italy (the OLS:-1.244) are negative while the coe cient of the U.S. (the OLS:2.080) is positive. Finally, we comment on Table 3 with respect to the di erence in the education variables. We estimate the same specification by Bingley and Martinello (2013) 11 in the column (3) of Table 3. The e ect of omitting the ELSA is large. Bingley and Martinello (2013) reports in the specification All in Table 3 of the paper by Bingley and Martinello (2013). However, when we estimate the same model in our paper, the coe cients are (IV1) and (IV2). Please note that we do not impute years of schooling variable of the ELSA We omit the samples of the ELSA. The heterogeneity of the e ect of retirement on cognitive function is large in each country. On the other hand, when we use the dummy variable indicating people with more than college degree, the di erence in the value of coe cient is not large. We use the dummy variable indicating people with more than college degree in all the columns except the column (3) because the education variable indicating people 11 See the specification All in Table 3 of Bingley and Martinello (2013). 13
14 Table 3: The e ect of instrumental variables and other control variables (without the coe cients of country dummies) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) IV1 IV2 IV1 IV2 IV1 IV2 IV1 IV2 OLS IV1 IV2 OLS IV1 IV2 IV-early (0.013) (0.011) (0.014) (0.011) (0.016) (0.013) (0.015) (0.015) (0.017) (0.018) (0.017) (0.018) IV-normal (0.011) (0.013) (0.012) (0.014) (0.013) (0.016) (0.020) (0.022) (0.020) (0.021) (0.020) (0.021) Not work for pay (0.319) (0.433) (0.421) (0.690) (0.404) (0.766) (0.952) (1.032) (0.071) (2.246) (3.272) (0.072) (2.114) (3.125) Univ (0.120) (0.154) (0.158) (0.169) (0.082) (0.314) (0.450) (0.086) (0.219) (0.312) Years of schooling (0.014) (0.021) Female (0.096) (0.126) (0.093) (0.120) (0.143) (0.154) (0.067) (0.319) (0.461) (0.067) (0.292) (0.427) (2.385) (2.491) (2.777) (2.390) (2.460) (2.750) squared (1.923) (1.993) (2.210) (1.927) (1.972) (2.196) Mariage (0.082) (0.088) (0.099) (0.089) (0.154) (0.208) Nofchildren (0.021) (0.021) (0.022) (0.021) (0.021) (0.023) Income (0.056) (0.016) (0.018) Own house (0.093) (0.124) (0.157) Total wealth (0.006) (0.002) (0.002) Observations R DWHchi DWHpval Standard errors in parentheses p<.1, p<.05, p<.01 All economic variables (e.g. Total wealth, Income) are measured in dollars. In the specification (6), (country dummy) (economic variable). (e.g. (Total wealth) (the U.S. dummy)) variables are also included. The estimated coe cients of these cross terms are not presented. The Belgium dummy is omitted.
15 Table 3: (continue) The e ect of instrumental variables and other control variables (only the coe cients of country dummies) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) IV1 IV2 IV1 IV2 IV1 IV2 IV1 IV2 OLS IV1 IV2 OLS IV1 IV2 2.US (0.369) (0.396) (0.148) (0.866) (1.248) (0.183) (0.809) (1.177) 3.UK (0.310) (0.328) (0.156) (0.657) (0.935) (0.203) (0.519) (0.732) 11.Austria (0.238) (0.243) (0.232) (0.254) (0.288) (0.324) (0.336) (0.366) 12.Germany (0.220) (0.230) (0.183) (0.362) (0.489) (0.235) (0.333) (0.426) 13.Sweden (0.474) (0.509) (0.184) (1.063) (1.532) (0.306) (0.787) (1.114) 14.Netherlands (0.205) (0.211) (0.194) (0.257) (0.315) (0.290) (0.328) (0.377) Spain (0.267) (0.283) (0.213) (0.459) (0.630) (0.284) (0.444) (0.590) 16.Italy (0.193) (0.199) (0.186) (0.237) (0.284) (0.228) (0.232) (0.250) 17.France (0.204) (0.212) (0.201) (0.209) (0.229) (0.260) (0.272) (0.303) 18.Denmark (0.329) (0.350) (0.232) (0.597) (0.835) (0.306) (0.419) (0.540) 19.Greece (0.250) (0.264) (0.193) (0.419) (0.579) (0.275) (0.369) (0.473) 20.Switzerland (0.462) (0.493) (0.285) (0.922) (1.311) (0.427) (0.775) (1.062) Observations R Standard errors in parentheses p<.1, p<.05, p<.01 All economic variables (e.g. Total wealth, Income) are measured in dollars. In the specification (6), (country dummy) (economic variable). (e.g. (Total wealth) (the U.S. dummy)) variables are also included. The estimated coe cients of these cross terms are not presented. The Belgium dummy is omitted.
16 with more than college degree is available in the Harmonised Data Set made by the code which the Global Aging Data provides. 12 We comment on Table 4. Table 4 shows the results of the same specification (6) in Table 3. However, we show the results of the di erent cohort groups. The columns in 2004 presents the estimated result using the samples aged from 60 to 64 at The columns in 2010 presents the estimated result using the samples aged from 60 to 64 at The analysed cohort groups are di erent between the column 2004 and the column The analysed countries are the same in both the column 2004 and the column We analyse the same countries in Table 4. According to Table 4, the e ect of the di erence in the cohort groups is very weak. The DWH tests in both the column 2004 and the column 2010 are rejected. The OLS results in both the column 2004 and the column 2010 are almost the same ( (2004) and (2010)) after controlling the heterogeneity of the analysed countries. After controlling the heterogeneity of the analysed countries, the coe cient of the other control variables are also similar between the OLS result of 2004 and that of Table 5 reports the result when we change the analysed countries. The specification is the same as that of the column (6) in Table 3. All results are estimated by using only the dataset at We change the analysed countries in each result Ori. shows the estimated result including only the countries (e.g. the U.S., England, France and Germany) which Rohwedder and Willis (2010) analysed. Table 5 shows the estimated coe cients of the country dummies in each specification. Western includes only the European countries which are both the European countries analysed by Rohwedder and Willis (2010) and the countries added to the SHARE by 2010 (e.g. Czechia, Poland and Hungary) Ori.+EA includes the European countries analysed by Rohwedder and Willis (2010), China and Japan. ALL countries includes all countries. As we can see, the degree of the heterogeneity of the estimated results are very large in Table 5. When we analyse only the European countries, the coe cients are significantly negative ( 2004 Origi. :-0.631(OLS), Western :-0.653(OLS) while the coe cients of 2004 Ori.+EA or ALL countries are significantly positive or not significant ( 2004 Ori.+EA :5.554(IV2)(not significant), ALL countries :3.912(IV2)). We separate the samples into two parts in ALL countries. Not Attend Social Act indicates the samples who do not participate any social activity at 2010 which we explain in the section 2. Attend Social Act indicates the samples who participate at least one social activity at Table 5 also shows the importance of separating the samples depending on the heterogeneity of activity. According to Table 5, in the samples who participate at least social activity, the e ect of retirement on cognitive function is negative while the e ect is not significant in the samples who do not participate any social activity ( Attend Social Act. :-0.415(OLS), Not Attend Social Act. :-0.020(OLS)(not significant)). However, with respect to the heterogeneity of activity, we have to be careful of interpreting the result. We use the cross sectional information here. As a result, the e ect of the change in social interaction on remaining cognitive function after retirement is unclear. We do not consider any transition pattern before and after retirement. 12 See the website The JSTAR is the data at The CHARLS is the data at
17 17 Table 4: The e ect of the di erence in the cohort groups OLS IV1 IV2 OLS IV2 IV-early (0.017) (0.018) (0.018) IV-normal (0.021) (0.022) (0.019) Not work for pay (0.074) (2.327) (2.697) (0.072) (2.770) Univ (0.088) (0.245) (0.283) (0.081) (0.319) Female (0.068) (0.306) (0.353) (0.066) (0.326) (2.455) (2.556) (2.868) (2.366) (2.862) squared (1.980) (2.042) (2.291) (1.909) (2.258) Mariage (0.092) (0.159) (0.180) (0.086) (0.172) Nofchildren (0.021) (0.022) (0.024) (0.022) (0.024) Income (0.040) (0.017) (0.017) (0.099) (0.016) Own house (0.095) (0.134) (0.150) (0.088) (0.127) Total wealth (0.002) (0.002) (0.002) (0.003) (0.003) OLS IV1 IV2 OLS IV2 2.US (0.183) (0.883) (1.017) (0.202) (0.623) 3.UK (0.203) (0.561) (0.645) (0.226) (0.378) 11.Austria (0.324) (0.334) (0.361) (0.285) (0.417) 12.Germany (0.235) (0.349) (0.389) (0.458) (0.776) 13.Sweden (0.306) (0.858) (0.975) (0.439) (1.086) 14.Netherlands (0.290) (0.336) (0.360) (0.279) (0.600) 15.Spain (0.284) (0.466) (0.534) (0.287) (0.320) 16.Italy (0.228) (0.232) (0.249) (0.304) (0.339) 17.France (0.260) (0.271) (0.301) (0.265) (0.397) 18.Denmark (0.306) (0.430) (0.502) (0.365) (0.825) 20.Switzerland (0.427) (0.833) (0.945) (0.284) (1.140) Observations R DWHchi DWHpval Standard errors in parentheses p<.1, p<.05, p<.01 All economic variables (e.g. Total wealth, Income) are measured in dollars. In the specification (6), (country dummy) (economic variable) (e.g. (Total wealth) (the U.S. dummy)) variables are also included. The estimated coe cients of these cross terms are not presented. The Belgium dummy is omitted.
18 If we consider this point, we have to use a panel data. We analyse this point in detail in next section. Finally, Table 6 shows the results analysing the e ect of changing the surveyed age-group and the definition of retirement. The columns of Not Work is the analysis defining the retirement as not working for pay. The columns of is the analysis defining the retirement as a respondent reports a retired status. This is the same definition of the second retirement definition in the section 3. See footnote. The & Not Work is the analysis defining the retirement as not working for pay and a respondent reports a retired status. According to Table 6, the e ect of changing the age group is not strong while the e ect of changing the retirement definition is very strong. In the columns & Not Work, the result of OLS are not significant in both age groups. In addition, in the columns Not Work, the result of OLS is significantly negative. In addition, in the columns, the result of OLS is significantly positive except the age group at Whether a respondent or not depends on the self-reported information. Some respondent retire according to the definition of although they work for pay. This is the reason that the di erence in the definitions influences the di erence in the final conclusions. We summarise this section. What we find from our analysis in this section is the followings. The unobserved heterogeneity largely influences the estimated result when we omit the important control variables (Table 3). The heterogeneity of the analysed countries largely influences the estimated result. When we change the analysed country, we can get the di erent conclusion. As a result, we should care the heterogeneity of each country when we analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function (Table 3, 5). The definition of retirement also largely influences the result. Sometimes, the results derives di erent conclusion depending the definition of retirement (Table 6). Other factors, which are the di erence in age-groups or the di erence in the cohort groups, are not important (Table 4, 6). According to our analysis, the country heterogeneity largely influences the estimated result and the cohort or age group heterogeneity do not largely influences. When we use the identification strategy in this section (cross-sectional cross-country analysis), we cannot omit the unobserved heterogeneity which can correlate the other control variables and can be the source of bias on the coe cient of the retirement variable. We consider that we should analyse the e ect of retirement on cognitive function in only one country and omit the unobserved heterogeneity when we estimate the e ect of retirement on cognitive function. In next section, we analyse only the U.S. by using the HRS. We also analyse the influence of the heterogeneity of the behaviour transition pattern before and after retirement and individual characteristics. 18
19 Table 5: The e ect of the di erence in the analysed countries (without the coe cients of country dummies) 2004 Ori. Western 2004 Ori.+EA ALL countries Full sample Not Attend Social Act. Attend Social Act. OLS IV2 OLS IV2 OLS IV2 OLS IV2 OLS IV2 OLS IV2 IV-Early (0.018) (0.014) (0.017) (0.014) (0.043) (0.017) IV-Normal (0.019) (0.013) (0.018) (0.013) (0.026) (0.015) Not work for pay (0.072) (2.770) (0.063) (1.943) (0.065) (3.465) (0.058) (2.331) (0.127) (2.908) (0.072) (2.725) Univ (0.081) (0.319) (0.072) (0.227) (0.080) (0.398) (0.071) (0.272) (0.193) (0.222) (0.083) (0.321) Female (0.066) (0.326) (0.057) (0.224) (0.059) (0.434) (0.052) (0.280) (0.112) (0.409) (0.064) (0.339) (2.366) (2.862) (2.025) (2.370) (2.138) (3.055) (1.877) (2.511) (4.035) (5.522) (2.264) (2.391) 19 squared (1.909) (2.258) (1.634) (1.871) (1.725) (2.415) (1.514) (1.982) (3.254) (4.405) (1.826) (1.895) Mariage (0.086) (0.172) (0.072) (0.155) (0.080) (0.158) (0.068) (0.153) (0.155) (0.217) (0.083) (0.208) Nofchildren (0.022) (0.024) (0.020) (0.020) (0.020) (0.034) (0.019) (0.025) (0.039) (0.050) (0.023) (0.027) Income (0.099) (0.016) (0.397) (0.473) (0.175) (0.020) (0.396) (0.570) (1.746) (1.282) (0.375) (0.636) Own house (0.088) (0.127) (0.077) (0.090) (0.080) (0.168) (0.072) (0.111) (0.157) (0.314) (0.088) (0.089) Total wealth (0.003) (0.003) (0.010) (0.006) (0.006) (0.004) (0.026) (0.007) (0.141) (0.062) (0.009) (0.006) Observations R DWHchi DWHpval Standard errors in parentheses p<.1, p<.05, p<.01 All economic variables (e.g. Total wealth, Income) are measured in dollars. In the specification (6), (country dummy) (economic variable) (e.g. (Total wealth) (the U.S. dummy)) variables are also included. The estimated coe cients of these cross terms are not presented. The Belgium dummy is omitted.
Examining the Changes in Health Investment Behavior After Retirement
Examining the Changes in Health Investment Behavior After Retirement Hiroyuki Motegi Yoshinori Nishimura Masato Oikawa Abstract This study examines the effects of retirement on health investment behaviors.
More informationEffects of working part-time and full-time on physical and mental health in old age in Europe
Effects of working part-time and full-time on physical and mental health in old age in Europe Tunga Kantarcı Ingo Kolodziej Tilburg University and Netspar RWI - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
More informationRetirement and Unexpected Health Shocks
Retirement and Unexpected Health Shocks BÉNÉDICTE APOUEY (PSE, FRANCE) CAHIT GUVEN (DEAKIN UNIVERSITY, AUSTRALIA) CLAUDIA SENIK (PSE, FRANCE) Motivation Workers plan to retire as soon as they are entitled
More informationHYPERTENSION AND LIFE SATISFACTION: A COMMENT AND REPLICATION OF BLANCHFLOWER AND OSWALD (2007)
HYPERTENSION AND LIFE SATISFACTION: A COMMENT AND REPLICATION OF BLANCHFLOWER AND OSWALD (2007) Stefania Mojon-Azzi Alfonso Sousa-Poza December 2007 Discussion Paper no. 2007-44 Department of Economics
More informationMaster Thesis II. Occupational-Based Effects of Retirement on Health 28/05/2012. Supervisor: Petter Lundborg
School of Economics and Management Department of Economics Master Thesis NEKP01 Master Thesis II Occupational-Based Effects of Retirement on Health 28/05/2012 Supervisor: Petter Lundborg Felizia Hanemann
More informationThe impact of a longer working life on health: exploiting the increase in the UK state pension age for women
The impact of a longer working life on health: exploiting the increase in the UK state pension age for women David Sturrock (IFS) joint with James Banks, Jonathan Cribb and Carl Emmerson June 2017; Preliminary,
More informationAustralia. 31 January Draft: please do not cite or quote. Abstract
Retirement and its Consequences for Health in Australia Kostas Mavromaras, Sue Richardson, and Rong Zhu 31 January 2014. Draft: please do not cite or quote. Abstract This paper estimates the causal effect
More informationAn Introduction to the Gateway to Global Aging Data
An Introduction to the Gateway to Global Aging Data "Data in Europe: Ageing" - Webinar June 14 th, 2017 Drystan Phillips Health and Retirement Studies around the World The Health and Retirement Study (HRS)
More informationCESR-SCHAEFFER WORKING PAPER SERIES
The Effects of Partial Retirement on Health Tunga Kantarci CESR-SCHAEFFER WORKING PAPER SERIES The Working Papers in this series have not undergone peer review or been edited by USC. The series is intended
More informationStress inducing or relieving? Retirement s causal effect on health
Stress inducing or relieving? Retirement s causal effect on health Peter Eibich 1 This Version: June 27, 2013 Abstract This paper estimates the causal effect of retirement on health using Regression Discontinuity
More informationThe Impact of Voluntary & Involuntary Retirement on Mental Health: Evidence from Older Irish Adults. Irene Mosca and Alan Barrett
The Impact of Voluntary & Involuntary Retirement on Mental Health: Evidence from Older Irish Adults Irene Mosca and Alan Barrett Motivation -1- Postponement of retirement to counteract effects of population
More informationPension Wealth and Household Saving in Europe: Evidence from SHARELIFE
Pension Wealth and Household Saving in Europe: Evidence from SHARELIFE Rob Alessie, Viola Angelini and Peter van Santen University of Groningen and Netspar PHF Conference 2012 12 July 2012 Motivation The
More informationOccupation, Retirement and Cognitive Functioning
Occupation, Retirement and Cognitive Functioning Shinya Kajitani, Meisei University, Kei Sakata, Ritsumeikan University and Colin McKenzie, Keio University Purpose To examine the causal impact of retirement
More informationLow employment among the 50+ population in Hungary
Low employment among the + population in Hungary The role of incentives, health and cognitive capacities Janos Divenyi (Central European University) and Gabor Kezdi (Central European University and IE-CRSHAS)
More informationLIFE-COURSE HEALTH AND LABOUR MARKET EXIT IN THIRTEEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: RESULTS FROM SHARELIFE
LIFE-COURSE HEALTH AND LABOUR MARKET EXIT IN THIRTEEN EUROPEAN COUNTRI: RULTS OM SHARELIFE Mauricio Avendano, Johan P. Mackenbach 227-2010 18 Life-Course Health and Labour Market Exit in Thirteen European
More informationNo Honeymoon Phase Whose health benefits from retirement and when
No Honeymoon Phase Whose health benefits from retirement and when Birgit Leimer October, 2017 Abstract I use a fixed effects instrumental variable approach to determine the effect of three distinct retirement
More informationJoint Retirement Decision of Couples in Europe
Joint Retirement Decision of Couples in Europe The Effect of Partial and Full Retirement Decision of Husbands and Wives on Their Partners Partial and Full Retirement Decision Gülin Öylü MSc Thesis 07/2017-006
More informationWorkforce participation of mature aged women
Workforce participation of mature aged women Geoff Gilfillan Senior Research Economist Productivity Commission Productivity Commission Topics Trends in labour force participation Potential labour supply
More informationDoes!Retirement!Improve!Health!and!Life!Satisfaction? *! Aspen"Gorry" Utah"State"University" Devon"Gorry" Utah"State"University" Sita"Nataraj"Slavov"
1"! Does!Retirement!Improve!Health!and!Life!Satisfaction? *! " Aspen"Gorry" Utah"State"University" " Devon"Gorry" Utah"State"University" " Sita"Nataraj"Slavov" George"Mason"University" " February"2015"
More informationOnline Appendix. Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: Do Dynamic Incentives Matter? by Aron-Dine, Einav, Finkelstein, and Cullen
Online Appendix Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: Do Dynamic Incentives Matter? by Aron-Dine, Einav, Finkelstein, and Cullen Appendix A: Analysis of Initial Claims in Medicare Part D In this appendix we
More informationTHE ABOLITION OF THE EARNINGS RULE
THE ABOLITION OF THE EARNINGS RULE FOR UK PENSIONERS Richard Disney Sarah Tanner THE INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL STUDIES WP 00/13 THE ABOLITION OF THE EARNINGS RULE FOR UK PENSIONERS 1 Richard Disney Sarah Tanner
More informationThe Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods.
The Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods. Sarah Brown, Daniel Gray and Jennifer Roberts ISSN 1749-8368 SERPS no. 2015006 March 2015 The Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods.
More informationTax Burden, Tax Mix and Economic Growth in OECD Countries
Tax Burden, Tax Mix and Economic Growth in OECD Countries PAOLA PROFETA RICCARDO PUGLISI SIMONA SCABROSETTI June 30, 2015 FIRST DRAFT, PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE WITHOUT THE AUTHORS PERMISSION Abstract Focusing
More informationChapter 7. Employment protection
Chapter 7 Employment protection This chapter heavily borrows from courses and slides by Tito Boeri, Professor of Economics at Bocconi University, Milan, Italy Protecting jobs Losing a job is always a bad
More informationDoes One Law Fit All? Cross-Country Evidence on Okun s Law
Does One Law Fit All? Cross-Country Evidence on Okun s Law Laurence Ball Johns Hopkins University Global Labor Markets Workshop Paris, September 1-2, 2016 1 What the paper does and why Provides estimates
More informationUnderstanding Health, Economic and Social Status of the Elderly :Starting Japanese version of HRS/SHARE/ELSA
Understanding Health, Economic and Social Status of the Elderly :Starting Japanese version of HRS/SHARE/ELSA Hidehiko Ichimura (Univ. of Tokyo, RIETI FF.) Satoshi Shimizutani (Hitotsubashi Univ. RIETI
More informationSwedish Lessons: How Important are ICT and R&D to Economic Growth? Paper prepared for the 34 th IARIW General Conference, Dresden, Aug 21-27, 2016
Swedish Lessons: How Important are ICT and R&D to Economic Growth? Paper prepared for the 34 th IARIW General Conference, Dresden, Aug 21-27, 2016 Harald Edquist, Ericsson Research Magnus Henrekson, Research
More informationHEALTH INEQUALITIES BY EDUCATION, INCOME, AND WEALTH: A COMPARISON OF 11 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND THE US
HEALTH INEQUALITIES BY EDUCATION, INCOME, AND WEALTH: A COMPARISON OF 11 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND THE US Hendrik Jürges 140-20 Health inequalities by education, income, and wealth: a comparison of 11 European
More informationThe Early Retirement Decision and Its Impact on Health What the Chinese Mandatory Retirement Reveals
The Early Retirement Decision and Its Impact on Health What the Chinese Mandatory Retirement Reveals Yingying Dong Department of Economics Boston College Email: dongyi@bc.edu November 2008 The following
More informationDETERMINANTS OF RETIREMENT STATUS: COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE FROM OLD AND NEW EU MEMBER STATES
DETERMINANTS OF RETIREMENT STATUS: COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE FROM OLD AND NEW EU MEMBER STATES By Rashad Mehbaliyev Submitted to Central European University Department of Economics In partial fulfillment of
More informationIncome smoothing and foreign asset holdings
J Econ Finan (2010) 34:23 29 DOI 10.1007/s12197-008-9070-2 Income smoothing and foreign asset holdings Faruk Balli Rosmy J. Louis Mohammad Osman Published online: 24 December 2008 Springer Science + Business
More informationThe Causal Effects of Economic Incentives, Health and Job Characteristics on Retirement: Estimates Based on Subjective Conditional Probabilities*
The Causal Effects of Economic Incentives, Health and Job Characteristics on Retirement: Estimates Based on Subjective Conditional Probabilities* Péter Hudomiet, Michael D. Hurd, and Susann Rohwedder October,
More informationTHE DETERMINANTS OF SECTORAL INWARD FDI PERFORMANCE INDEX IN OECD COUNTRIES
THE DETERMINANTS OF SECTORAL INWARD FDI PERFORMANCE INDEX IN OECD COUNTRIES Lena Malešević Perović University of Split, Faculty of Economics Assistant Professor E-mail: lena@efst.hr Silvia Golem University
More information10% 10% 15% 15% Caseload: WE. 15% Caseload: SS 10% 10% 15%
Percentchangeincaseload 15% 10% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% Caseload: AO 0 1 2 3 4 5 Percentchangein caseload 15% 10% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% Caseload: NC 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years Years Percentchangein caseload 15% 10% 5% 0% 5%
More informationInvestigating the Intertemporal Risk-Return Relation in International. Stock Markets with the Component GARCH Model
Investigating the Intertemporal Risk-Return Relation in International Stock Markets with the Component GARCH Model Hui Guo a, Christopher J. Neely b * a College of Business, University of Cincinnati, 48
More informationThe Causal Effect of Retirement on Mortality: Evidence from Targeted Incentives to Retire Early
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 7570 The Causal Effect of Retirement on Mortality: Evidence from Targeted Incentives to Retire Early Hans Bloemen Stefan Hochguertel Jochem Zweerink August 2013 Forschungsinstitut
More informationStatistical annex. Sources and definitions
Statistical annex Sources and definitions Most of the statistics shown in these tables can be found as well in several other (paper or electronic) publications or references, as follows: the annual edition
More informationAgeing and employment policies: Ireland
Ageing and employment policies: Ireland John Martin 1 Director for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD FÁS Annual Labour Market Conference, Dublin, 5 December 2005 OECD has carried out a major
More informationAppendix A. Additional Results
Appendix A Additional Results for Intergenerational Transfers and the Prospects for Increasing Wealth Inequality Stephen L. Morgan Cornell University John C. Scott Cornell University Descriptive Results
More informationConditional convergence: how long is the long-run? Paul Ormerod. Volterra Consulting. April Abstract
Conditional convergence: how long is the long-run? Paul Ormerod Volterra Consulting April 2003 pormerod@volterra.co.uk Abstract Mainstream theories of economic growth predict that countries across the
More informationJOINT RESEARCH CENTER FOR PANEL STUDIES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES. Occupation, Retirement and Cognitive Functioning
JOINT RESEARCH CENTER FOR PANEL STUDIES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DP2012-002 February, 2013 Occupation, Retirement and Cognitive Functioning Joint Research Center for Panel Studies Keio University Occupation,
More informationConstraints on Exchange Rate Flexibility in Transition Economies: a Meta-Regression Analysis of Exchange Rate Pass-Through
Constraints on Exchange Rate Flexibility in Transition Economies: a Meta-Regression Analysis of Exchange Rate Pass-Through Igor Velickovski & Geoffrey Pugh Applied Economics 43 (27), 2011 National Bank
More informationStatistical Evidence and Inference
Statistical Evidence and Inference Basic Methods of Analysis Understanding the methods used by economists requires some basic terminology regarding the distribution of random variables. The mean of a distribution
More informationLabour Force Participation in the Euro Area: A Cohort Based Analysis
Labour Force Participation in the Euro Area: A Cohort Based Analysis Almut Balleer (University of Bonn) Ramon Gomez Salvador (European Central Bank) Jarkko Turunen (European Central Bank) ECB/CEPR LM workshop,
More informationImplications of Increases in Life Expectancy for Policy
Implications of Increases in Life Expectancy for Policy By Hilary Waldron, Social Security Administration Adapted from Waldron (2007), Trends in Mortality Differentials and Life Expectancy for Male Social
More informationStatistical Annex ANNEX
ISBN 92-64-02384-4 OECD Employment Outlook Boosting Jobs and Incomes OECD 2006 ANNEX Statistical Annex Sources and definitions Most of the statistics shown in these tables can be found as well in three
More informationOnline Appendixes Aging and Strategic Learning: The Impact of Spousal Incentives on Financial Literacy by Joanne W. Hsu
Online Appendixes Aging and Strategic Learning: The Impact of Spousal Incentives on Financial Literacy by Joanne W. Hsu 1 Data appendix 1.1 Response rates 1,222participantswhocompletedtheCogUSAstudy 12
More informationInfluence of demographic factors on the public pension spending
Influence of demographic factors on the public pension spending By Ciobanu Radu 1 Bucharest University of Economic Studies Abstract: Demographic aging is a global phenomenon encountered especially in the
More informationPan-European opinion poll on occupational safety and health
REPORT Pan-European opinion poll on occupational safety and health Results across 36 European countries Final report Conducted by Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute at the request of the European Agency
More informationEmpirical appendix of Public Expenditure Distribution, Voting, and Growth
Empirical appendix of Public Expenditure Distribution, Voting, and Growth Lorenzo Burlon August 11, 2014 In this note we report the empirical exercises we conducted to motivate the theoretical insights
More informationChristine A. Mair, PhD University of Maryland Baltimore County.
Christine A. Mair, PhD University of Maryland Baltimore County Cross-national (12-20 European nations) Panel (4 waves 04/05, 06/07, 08/09, 11/12) Older adults 50+ (~30,000 individuals) Multidisciplinary
More informationDemographics and Secular Stagnation Hypothesis in Europe
Demographics and Secular Stagnation Hypothesis in Europe Carlo Favero (Bocconi University, IGIER) Vincenzo Galasso (Bocconi University, IGIER, CEPR & CESIfo) Growth in Europe?, Marseille, September 2015
More informationHealth and Retirement in Europe
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 2676-2695; doi:10.3390/ijerph6102676 OPEN ACCESS Article International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
More informationPrivate pensions. A growing role. Who has a private pension?
Private pensions A growing role Private pensions play an important and growing role in providing for old age in OECD countries. In 11 of them Australia, Denmark, Hungary, Iceland, Mexico, Norway, Poland,
More informationInformation and Capital Flows Revisited: the Internet as a
Running head: INFORMATION AND CAPITAL FLOWS REVISITED Information and Capital Flows Revisited: the Internet as a determinant of transactions in financial assets Changkyu Choi a, Dong-Eun Rhee b,* and Yonghyup
More informationChanges over Time in Subjective Retirement Probabilities
Marjorie Honig Changes over Time in Subjective Retirement Probabilities No. 96-036 HRS/AHEAD Working Paper Series July 1996 The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Study of Asset and Health Dynamics
More informationCSO Research Paper. Econometric analysis of the public/private sector pay differential
CSO Research Paper Econometric analysis of the public/private sector pay differential 2011 to 2014 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 1 INTRODUCTION... 5 1.1 SPECIFICATIONS INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS... 6
More informationThe Consistency between Analysts Earnings Forecast Errors and Recommendations
The Consistency between Analysts Earnings Forecast Errors and Recommendations by Lei Wang Applied Economics Bachelor, United International College (2013) and Yao Liu Bachelor of Business Administration,
More informationMonetary policy regimes and exchange rate fluctuations
Seðlabanki Íslands Monetary policy regimes and exchange rate fluctuations The views are of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Central Bank of Iceland Thórarinn G. Pétursson Central
More informationIssue Brief: Occupation, Cognitive Decline and Retirement
ISSUE BRIEF Issue Brief: Occupation, Cognitive Decline and Retirement Brooke Helppie McFall and Amanda Sonnega * Introduction Physical health problems are a major reason for early exits from the labor
More informationWork Capacity of Older Workers: Canada and the United States
Work Capacity of Older Workers: Canada and the United States Kevin Milligan Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia Presented at NBER-CCER Conference on China and the World Economy
More informationLifetime Income Inequality: quantile treatment effect of retirement on the distribution of lifetime income.
Lifetime Income Inequality: quantile treatment effect of retirement on the distribution of lifetime income. Małgorzata Karolina Kozłowska University of Rome "Tor Vergata" February 6, 26 Małgorzata Karolina
More informationDoes Taking Part in Social Activities prevent the Disablement Process?
Does Taking Part in Social Activities prevent the Disablement Process? Nicolas Sirven *,1,2 & Florence Jusot 3, 2 Abstract Context With the aging of the baby-boom generation, the third age will soon represent
More informationFinancial Literacy and Subjective Expectations Questions: A Validation Exercise
Financial Literacy and Subjective Expectations Questions: A Validation Exercise Monica Paiella University of Naples Parthenope Dept. of Business and Economic Studies (Room 314) Via General Parisi 13, 80133
More informationThe Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information: Evidence from the U.K. Annuity Market
The Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information: Evidence from the U.K. Annuity Market Liran Einav 1 Amy Finkelstein 2 Paul Schrimpf 3 1 Stanford and NBER 2 MIT and NBER 3 MIT Cowles 75th Anniversary Conference
More informationPOVERTY AND INCOMES OF OLDER PEOPLE IN OECD COUNTRIES. Asghar Zaidi
POVERTY AND INCOMES OF OLDER PEOPLE IN OECD COUNTRIES by Asghar Zaidi Paper prepared for the 31st General Conference, St-Gallen, Switzerland, 22-28 August, 2010 * Asghar Zaidi is Director Research at the
More informationJournal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 31 (2012) 490 501 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Health Economics j o ur nal homep age : www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Does retirement affect
More informationDeterminants of demand for life insurance in European countries
Determinants of demand for life insurance in European countries AUTHORS ARTICLE INFO JOURNAL Sibel Çelik Mustafa Mesut Kayali Sibel Çelik and Mustafa Mesut Kayali (29). Determinants of demand for life
More informationCorrigendum. OECD Pensions Outlook 2012 DOI: ISBN (print) ISBN (PDF) OECD 2012
OECD Pensions Outlook 2012 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/9789264169401-en ISBN 978-92-64-16939-5 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-16940-1 (PDF) OECD 2012 Corrigendum Page 21: Figure 1.1. Average annual real net investment
More informationAn alternative approach for the key assumption of life insurers and pension funds
2018 An alternative approach for the key assumption of life insurers and pension funds EMBEDDING TIME VARYING EXPERIENCE FACTORS IN PROJECTION MORTALITY TABLES AUTHORS: BIANCA MEIJER JANINKE TOL Abstract
More informationHEALTH LABOUR MARKET TRENDS IN OECD COUNTRIES
HEALTH LABOUR MARKET TRENDS IN OECD COUNTRIES Michael Schoenstein, OECD Health Division 3 rd Global Health Workforce Alliance Forum Recife, 11 November 2013 Main health labour market issues in OECD countries
More informationDiscussion of Fiscal Positions and Government Bond Yields in OECD Countries by Joseph W. Gruber and Steven B. Kamin
Discussion of Fiscal Positions and Government Bond Yields in OECD Countries by Joseph W. Gruber and Steven B. Kamin Christian Grisse Federal Reserve Bank of New York SCIEA conference, Atlanta, April 29,
More informationShattered Dreams: The Effects of Changing the Pension System Late in the Game
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 4034 Shattered Dreams: The Effects of Changing the Pension System Late in the Game Andries de Grip Maarten Lindeboom Raymond Montizaan February 2009 Forschungsinstitut
More information17 January 2019 Japan Laurence Boone OECD Chief Economist
Fiscal challenges and inclusive growth in ageing societies 17 January 219 Japan Laurence Boone OECD Chief Economist G2 populations are ageing rapidly Expected life expectancy at age 65 198 215 26 Japan
More informationWhy so low for so long? A long-term view of real interest rates
Why so low for so long? A long-term view of real interest rates Claudio Borio, Piti Disyatat, and Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul Bank of Finland/CEPR Conference, Demographics and the Macroeconomy, Helsinki,
More informationEXAMINATIONS OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY
EXAMINATIONS OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY ORDINARY CERTIFICATE IN STATISTICS, 2017 MODULE 2 : Analysis and presentation of data Time allowed: Three hours Candidates may attempt all the questions. The
More informationYOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE EURO AREA
YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE EURO AREA Ramon Gomez-Salvador and Nadine Leiner-Killinger European Central Bank EKONOMSKI INSTITUT PRAVNE FAKULTETE 14 December 2007 Ljubljana Outline I. Introduction II. Stylised
More informationObesity, Disability, and Movement onto the DI Rolls
Obesity, Disability, and Movement onto the DI Rolls John Cawley Cornell University Richard V. Burkhauser Cornell University Prepared for the Sixth Annual Conference of Retirement Research Consortium The
More informationFor One More Year with You : Changes in Compulsory Schooling, Education and the Distribution of Wages in Europe
For One More Year with You : Changes in Compulsory Schooling, Education and the Distribution of Wages in Europe Margherita Fort Giorgio Brunello and Guglielmo Weber PRELIMINARY WORK European University
More informationTrade Performance in EU27 Member States
Trade Performance in EU27 Member States Martin Gress Department of International Relations and Economic Diplomacy, Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia. Abstract
More informationAging with Growth: Implications for Productivity and the Labor Force Emily Sinnott
Aging with Growth: Implications for Productivity and the Labor Force Emily Sinnott Emily Sinnott, Senior Economist, The World Bank Tallinn, June 18, 2015 Presentation structure 1. Growth, productivity
More informationThe effect of the tax reform act of 1986 on the location of assets in financial services firms
Journal of Public Economics 87 (2002) 109 127 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase The effect of the tax reform act of 1986 on the location of assets in financial services firms Rosanne Altshuler *, R. Glenn
More informationIncome and Wealth Inequality in OECD Countries
DOI: 1.17/s1273-16-1946-8 Verteilung -Vergleich Horacio Levy and Inequality in Countries The has longstanding experience in research on income inequality, with studies dating back to the 197s. Since 8
More informationThe Effect of Financial Constraints, Investment Policy and Product Market Competition on the Value of Cash Holdings
The Effect of Financial Constraints, Investment Policy and Product Market Competition on the Value of Cash Holdings Abstract This paper empirically investigates the value shareholders place on excess cash
More informationDANMARKS NATIONALBANK
DANMARKS NATIONALBANK WEALTH, DEBT AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY Niels Lynggård Hansen, Head of Economics and Monetary Policy. IARIW, Copenhagen, 21 August 2018 Agenda Descriptive evidence on household debt
More information8-Jun-06 Personal Income Top Marginal Tax Rate,
8-Jun-06 Personal Income Top Marginal Tax Rate, 1975-2005 2005 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 Australia 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 48% 49% 49% Austria
More informationInternational comparison of poverty amongst the elderly
International comparison of poverty amongst the elderly RPRC PensionBriefing 2009-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This PensionBriefing
More informationThe trade balance and fiscal policy in the OECD
European Economic Review 42 (1998) 887 895 The trade balance and fiscal policy in the OECD Philip R. Lane *, Roberto Perotti Economics Department, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland Columbia University,
More informationCapital allocation in Indian business groups
Capital allocation in Indian business groups Remco van der Molen Department of Finance University of Groningen The Netherlands This version: June 2004 Abstract The within-group reallocation of capital
More informationTrust and Fertility Dynamics. Arnstein Aassve, Università Bocconi Francesco C. Billari, University of Oxford Léa Pessin, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Trust and Fertility Dynamics Arnstein Aassve, Università Bocconi Francesco C. Billari, University of Oxford Léa Pessin, Universitat Pompeu Fabra 1 Background Fertility rates across OECD countries differ
More informationFertility Decline and Work-Life Balance: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications
Fertility Decline and Work-Life Balance: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications Kazuo Yamaguchi Hanna Holborn Gray Professor and Chair Department of Sociology The University of Chicago October, 2009
More informationConsumption Expenditure on Health and Education: Econometric Models and evolution of OECD countries in
University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics. Econometrics * Working Paper Series Economic Development. nº 50 Consumption Expenditure on Health and Education: Econometric Models and evolution
More informationVolume 35, Issue 1. Effects of Aging on Gender Differences in Financial Markets
Volume 35, Issue 1 Effects of Aging on Gender Differences in Financial Markets Ran Shao Yeshiva University Na Wang Hofstra University Abstract Gender differences in risk-taking and investment decisions
More informationEuropean Economic Review
European Economic Review 56 (212) 691 71 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect European Economic Review journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eer Ageing, cognitive abilities and retirement
More informationOnline Appendix Long-Lasting Effects of Socialist Education
Online Appendix Long-Lasting Effects of Socialist Education Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln Goethe University Frankfurt, CEPR, and IZA Paolo Masella University of Sussex and IZA December 11, 2015 1 Temporary Disruptions
More informationHOUSEHOLD DEBT AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS: COMPARATIVE MICRO EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES
HOUSEHOLD DEBT AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS: COMPARATIVE MICRO EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES Jonathan Crook (University of Edinburgh) and Stefan Hochguertel (VU University Amsterdam) Discussion by Ernesto
More informationGateway to Global Aging Data
Gateway to Global Aging Data www.g2aging.org April 1, 2015 HRS Harmonization Meeting Jinkook Lee, USC Center for Economic & Social Research (CESR) & RAND Corporation 1 Goal of the project is To facilitate
More informationUnderstanding the underlying dynamics of the reservation wage for South African youth. Essa Conference 2013
_ 1 _ Poverty trends since the transition Poverty trends since the transition Understanding the underlying dynamics of the reservation wage for South African youth ASMUS ZOCH Essa Conference 2013 KEYWORDS:
More informationProblem Set 9 Heteroskedasticty Answers
Problem Set 9 Heteroskedasticty Answers /* INVESTIGATION OF HETEROSKEDASTICITY */ First graph data. u hetdat2. gra manuf gdp, s([country].) xlab ylab 300000 manufacturing output (US$ miilio 200000 100000
More informationARE LEISURE AND WORK PRODUCTIVITY CORRELATED? A MACROECONOMIC INVESTIGATION
ARE LEISURE AND WORK PRODUCTIVITY CORRELATED? A MACROECONOMIC INVESTIGATION ANA-MARIA SAVA PH.D. CANDIDATE AT THE BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, e-mail: anamaria.sava89@yahoo.com Abstract It
More information