Public Wants Changes in Entitlements, Not Changes in Benefits

Transcription

1 THURSDAY, JULY 7, 2011 GOP Divided Over Benefit Reductions Public Wants Changes in Entitlements, Not Changes in Benefits FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll Doherty and Michael Dimock Associate Directors Scott Keeter Director of Survey Research 1615 L St, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C Tel (202) Fax (202)

2 GOP Divided Over Benefit Reductions Public Wants Changes in Entitlements, Not Changes in Benefits As policymakers at the state and national level struggle with rising entitlement costs, overwhelming numbers of Americans agree that, over the years, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid have been good for the country. But these cherished programs receive negative marks for current performance, and their finances are widely viewed as troubled. Reflecting these concerns, most Americans say all three programs either need to be completely rebuilt or undergo major changes. However, smaller majorities express this view than did so five years ago. Entitlements Overview Overwhelmingly Viewed as Good for the Country Over the years, each has been * Social Security Medicare Medicaid % % % Good for the country Bad for the country Don t know But Job Ratings Are Negative Job serving recipients Excellent/Good Only fair/poor Don t know The public s desire for fundamental change does not mean it supports reductions in the benefits provided by Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid. Relatively few are willing to see benefit cuts as part of the solution, regardless of whether the problem being addressed is the federal budget deficit, state budget shortfalls or the financial viability of the entitlement programs. The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted June among 1,502 adults, finds that Republicans face far more serious internal divisions over entitlement reforms than do Democrats. Lower income Republicans are Finances Are Seen as Troubled Current financial condition Excellent/Good Only fair/poor Don t know And Majorities Say They Need Major Changes consistently more likely to oppose reductions in benefits from Medicare, Social Security or Medicaid than are more affluent Republicans. Social Security Medicare Medicaid Needs to be completely rebuilt Needs major changes Works pretty well Don t know PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, * June 16-19, 2011 omnibus. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding.

3 2 On the broad question of whether it is more important to reduce the budget deficit or to maintain current Medicare and Social Security benefits, the public decisively supports maintaining the status quo. Six-in-ten (60%) say it is more important to keep Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are; only about half as many (32%) say it is more important to take steps to reduce the budget deficit. Half (50%) of Republicans say that maintaining benefits is more important than deficit reduction; about as many (42%) say it is more important to reduce the budget deficit. More independents prioritize maintaining benefits over reducing the deficit (by 53% to 38%). Democrats overwhelmingly view preserving current Social Security and Medicare benefits as more important (by 72% to 21%). The public also opposes making Medicare recipients more responsible for their health care costs and allowing states to limit Medicaid eligibility. About six-in-ten (61%) say people on Medicare already pay enough of their own health care costs, while only 31% think recipients need to be responsible for more of the costs of their health care in order to make the system financially secure. In Entitlement Debate, Most Want to Maintain Benefits Which is more important Taking steps to reduce the budget deficit 32% Other/DK 9% Dealing with Medicare Costs People on Medicare need to be responsible for more costs to make it financially secure 31% Other/DK 7% States and Medicaid Eligibility States should be able to cut back on Medicaid eligibility to deal with budget problems 37% Keeping Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are 60% People on Medicare already pay enough of their health costs 61% Low income people should not have their Medicaid benefits taken away 58% When it comes to Medicaid, just 37% want to allow states to cut back on who is eligible for Medicaid in order to deal with budget Other/DK 4% PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q51, Q56, Q57. problems, while 58% say low-income people should not have their Medicaid benefits taken away. And most say it is more important to avoid future cuts in Social Security benefits than future increases in Social Security taxes (56% vs. 33%).

4 3 On Social Security and Medicare, there are substantial differences of opinion by age. People age 65 and older are the only age group in which majorities say these programs work well; seniors also overwhelmingly say it is more important to maintain Social Security and Medicare benefits than to reduce the budget deficit. Those 50 to 64 also broadly favor keeping benefits as they are. Younger Americans support maintaining Social Security and Medicare benefits, but by smaller margins than older age groups. Lower income people are more committed to maintaining benefits across all three major entitlement programs. This income gap is particularly wide when it comes to allowing states to cut back on Medicaid eligibility: 72% of those with family incomes of less than $30,000 oppose allowing states to limit Medicaid eligibility to deal with budget problems, compared with 53% of those with higher incomes. GOP Base Divided over Entitlement Changes The GOP s internal divisions over entitlement changes are seen particularly in views of whether it is more important to maintain Social Security and Medicare benefits or to take steps to bring down the deficit. Among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, 63% of those with family incomes of $75,000 or more say it is more important to take steps to reduce the budget deficit; a nearly identical percentage (62%) of Republicans with incomes of $30,000 or less say it is more important to maintain Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are. Reducing Deficit a Lower Priority for Less Affluent Republicans Which is more important Among Rep/Lean Rep Reducing budget deficit Keeping SS/ Medicare benefits as they are Both/ DK % % % =100 $75, =100 $30-$74, =100 <$30, =100 Tea Party Agree =100 Disagree/ No opinion =100 Among Dem/Lean Dem =100 $75, =100 $30-$74, =100 <$30, =100 The income gap among Republicans and Republican leaners is about as large as the difference between GOP supporters of the Tea PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q51. Party and non-supporters. Among Republicans and Republican leaners who agree with the Tea Party, 57% view deficit reduction as more important than preserving Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are. Among

5 4 Republicans and leaners who do not agree with the Tea Party, just 36% say that reducing the deficit is more important than maintaining benefits. Democrats face no such internal divisions, as both high- and low-income Democrats prioritize maintaining benefits over deficit reduction; there also are no ideological differences among Democrats over this issue. Notably, the balance of opinion among low-income Republicans is similar to how Democrats view the issue.

6 5 SECTION 1: IMPRESSIONS OF ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS Majorities say that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security need to be completely rebuilt or undergo major changes. However, even larger numbers say that other systems and policies are in need of major changes. Entitlement Programs Viewed as Needing Major Changes or Complete Overhaul Immigration policy Education system Tax system Two-thirds (67%) say that immigration policy needs to Criminal justice system 17 be completely rebuilt (24%) Medicare system 21 or undergo major changes Medicaid system 17 (43%). Nearly as many say Social Security system 18 the same about the nation s educational system (66% Legal system completely rebuilt or major Homeland security system changes). And roughly six-inten PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q7. think that the tax system (62%) and criminal justice system (60%) need at least major changes Among the entitlement programs, 54% say either that Medicare should be completely rebuilt (21%) or changed in a major way (33%). Comparable percentages say the same about the Medicaid system (54%) and Social Security system (52%).

7 6 For each of the entitlement programs, the view that major change or a complete overhaul is needed is more widely held among Republicans than Democrats. About six-in-ten Republicans say each entitlement needs major changes or more, compared to about half of Democrats and about 55% of independents. While there are similar partisan gaps regarding changes to immigration policy (Republicans +17) and the criminal justice system (Democrats +12), there are narrower divisions when it comes to opinions about other policy areas. Partisan Differences over Necessity of Entitlement Changes Percent saying program needs major changes/ or to be completely rebuilt R-D Total Rep Dem Ind diff Immigration policy Social Security system Medicaid system Medicare system Homeland security system Education system Tax system Legal system Criminal justice system PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q7.

8 7 Support for Major Changes Declines The public s support for changing entitlement programs, while broad, has Less Support for Major Changes than in 2006 Percent saying program needs major changes/completely rebuilt declined since February Social Security Medicare At that time, 70% of Americans said Medicare needed to be completely rebuilt or undergo major changes; today, 54% say the % % % % same. Support for major PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q7a, b. changes to Social Security has also declined, from 62% in 2006 to 52% today Change Change Total Support for major changes to both Medicare and Social Security is significantly higher among those under 50 than it is among older Americans. About six-in-ten (61%) of those younger than 50 say Social Security requires major changes or a complete overhaul, compared with 50% of those 50 to 64 and just 30% of those 65 and older. Age and Entitlement Views Older Americans give both Social Security and Medicare higher marks for performance, with sizable majorities saying each does an excellent or good job serving the people they cover. By contrast, most Americans under age 65 say the programs do only a fair job or a poor job serving their recipients. Those living in households receiving Medicare or Social Security benefits also are more likely to rate the quality of the services provided positively. About half of those with participants in the household rate Social Security (49%) and Medicare (53%) as excellent or good at serving the people it covers compared with Social Security, Medicare Get More Positive Marks from Recipients Job program does serving the people it covers Social Security Medicare Excellent/ Good Only fair/ Poor Excellent/ Good Only fair/ Poor % % % % Total Program recipient in household? Yes No PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q49a,b.

9 8 about a third of those without program participants in their households. A similar gap is evident in views of Medicaid s performance between recipient households and nonrecipient households; 46% of those in households receiving Medicaid say it does an excellent or good job of serving the people it covers compared with 34% of those in households that do not receive Medicaid.

10 9 SECTION 2: ENTITLEMENTS VS. DEFICIT REDUCTION Despite rising public concern about the federal budget deficit, Americans favor keeping Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are rather than taking steps to reduce the budget deficit (by 60% vs. 32%). Republicans are twice as likely as Democrats to say deficit reduction is the higher priority (42% vs. 21%), yet even among Republicans the prevailing view (50%) is that maintaining benefits is the bigger priority. The balance of Deficit Concerns Take a Back Seat to Maintaining Benefits Feb 1995 opinion among independents is far closer to that of Republicans than Democrats, with 38% prioritizing the deficit and 53% prioritizing benefits. Jun 2011 Which is more important? % % Taking steps to reduce the deficit Keeping Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are Both/Don t know PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q51. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding. The public has shifted slightly from where it stood 16 years ago, when deficit reduction was being debated between then President Bill Clinton and the new Republican majority in Congress. In February 1995, 70% prioritized keeping benefits as they were, while just 24% said deficit reduction was more important. And then as now, Republicans were twice as likely as Democrats to prioritize the deficit (33% vs. 16%). Age Gaps in Both Parties While majorities in all age groups say maintaining current benefits is more important than deficit reduction, this sentiment is strongest among people over 50. About twothirds of those 50 and older (65%) say keeping benefits as they are is the priority; that compares with 55% of those younger than 50. These generational differences produce some degree of disagreement within each party s base. Notably, Republicans and Republican leaners who are 65 and older prioritize benefits over deficit reduction (52% vs. 35%), while those under age 50 are divided on the issue. The generation gap is even wider among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. Fully 81% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners who are 65 and older say keeping benefits as they are should take precedence, as do 77% of those age While roughly two-thirds (65%) of Democrats under 50 share this view, a substantial minority 31% says deficit reduction should take precedence.

11 10 Although the generational gaps are large, partisanship plays a much larger role in these opinions. Even the youngest Democrats are more supportive of maintaining benefits than the oldest Republicans (63% vs. 52%). Age Differences in Both Parties in Deficit vs. Benefits Tradeoff More important to take steps to reduce the deficit or to keep Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are? Total Rep/Lean Rep Dem/Lean Dem Reduce deficit Keep benefits Both/ DK Reduce deficit Keep benefits Both/ DK Reduce deficit Keep benefits % % % % % % % % % Total = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =100 $75k = = =100 $30k-$74, = = =100 <$30k = = =100 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q51. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding. Both/ DK The GOP s Income Divide By more than two-to-one, people with household incomes under $30,000, as well as those earning between $30,000 and $75,000, say keeping benefits as they are is more important than deficit reduction. Only among those with annual incomes over $75,000 is there a division of opinion, with as many prioritizing deficit reduction (46%) as benefits (48%). Among Republicans and Republican-leaners, this income divide is even more pronounced: Higher-income Republicans ($75,000+) overwhelmingly prioritize the deficit over benefits (by 63% vs. 29%) while low-income Republicans (less than $30,000) say it is more important to preserve benefits (by 62% vs. 33%). By contrast, there are no differences in the views of Democrats across income categories. Sizable majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners in every income group say that keeping benefits as they are is more important than deficit reduction.

12 11 Views of Specific Entitlement Changes The public s unwillingness to see Social Security and Medicare benefits cut in the interest of deficit reduction is evident when specific benefit reforms are tested. More Support for Expanding Payroll Taxes than Altering Social Security Benefits, Eligibility Total Rep Dem Ind Deficit reduction proposal % % % % Make more of high-earners Approve income subject to the Social Security payroll tax Disapprove In May, the Pew Research Center asked about 12 deficit reduction proposals; only one proposal related to entitlement programs received majority support, and it is a proposal linked to Reduce Social Security benefits for seniors with higher incomes Gradually raise the age at which people can begin receiving Social Security Raise the amount people on Medicare contribute to cover health care costs* Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove PEW RESEARCH CENTER May 25-30, Q37. * Dec. 1-5, Q53g. Social Security taxes, not benefits (For more, see More Blame Wars than Domestic Spending or Tax Cuts for Nation's Debt, June 7, 2011.) By a 67% to 26% margin, most Americans approve of making more of high-earners income subject to the Social Security payroll tax. This includes seven-in-ten Democrats and independents, and even a slim majority of Republicans. But the same poll found continued disapproval of raising the Social Security retirement age, or means-testing Social Security benefits. And a similar test in December 2010 found deep opposition to raising the amount Medicare recipients pay to cover their health care costs.

13 12 SECTION 3: VIEWS OF MEDICARE Nearly nine-in-ten (88%) give Medicare positive marks for its contributions to the country over the years, and these positive assessments cross party lines. There also is general agreement over the job Medicare does serving the people it covers (41% of Americans say it does an excellent or good job), and its financial shape (just 18% say it is Partisan Agreement on Medicare in excellent or good financial condition). and its Finances A partisan gap does emerge, however, when presented with the tradeoff of whether Medicare recipients should be more responsible for the costs of their health care in order to keep the program financially secure or whether Medicare recipients already pay enough of their costs. Majorities of Republicans (53%), Democrats (72%) and independents (58%) say that people on Medicare already pay enough of the cost of their health care. But 41% of Republicans say recipients should bear more of the costs, compared with 32% of independents and just 23% of Democrats. Total Rep Dem Ind Medicare % % % % Has been very good/good for the country Does an excellent/good job serving people it covers Is in excellent/good financial condition Not on Whether Recipients Should Bear More Health Care Costs People on Medicare Need to be responsible for more of the costs Already pay enough of the costs Other/Don t know PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q49b, Q50b & Q56. June 16-19, 2011 omnibus. PEW4b. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding.

14 13 Within the general public, opinions on this issue show modest variations by age and income. Democratic opinions, in particular, are relatively uniform. However, younger and more affluent Republicans are more likely than other Republicans to say Medicare participants should shoulder additional responsibility for the cost of their health care: 45% of Republicans and Republican leaners under 35 say people need to be more responsible, while just 27% of those 65 and older share this view. Nearly half (48%) of Republicans and Republican leaners with family incomes of $75,000 or more advocate more individual responsibility for the costs of Medicare, compared with just 33% among those with annual incomes below $30,000. Older and Low-Income Republicans Say Medicare Recipients Already Pay Enough for Health Care Do people on Medicare need to be responsible for more of the costs of their health care in order to keep the program financially secure, OR Do people on Medicare already pay enough of the cost of their health care? Total Rep/Lean Rep Dem/Lean Dem More responsible Pay enough Other/ DK More responsible Pay enough Other/ DK More responsible Pay enough Other/ DK % % % % % % % % % Total = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =100 $75k = = =100 $30k-$74, = = =100 <$30k = = =100 Medicare household? Yes = = =100 No = = =100 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q51. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding.

15 14 Public Doesn t See Medicare Overused A broader debate among Medicare analysts and policymakers is whether the system encourages the overutilization of medical treatments, driving up the overall cost of the program. While the extent of the problem may be debated in policy and economic circles, it has little resonance with the general public. Just 16% of Americans say that Medicare More Say Medicare Does Too Little Rather than Too Much makes it too easy to get medical care and treatments that may not be necessary. Twice as many (32%) are of the view that Medicare in fact makes it too difficult to get medical care and treatments that may be necessary for patients. The plurality view, held by 40%, is that current Medicare coverage is about right in this regard. This is the assessment of 61% of people age 65 and older, very few of whom think Medicare goes too far (12%) or not far enough (12%). Other/DK 12% Medicare coverage is about right 40% Makes it too easy to get medical care that may not be necessary 16% Makes it too difficult to get medical care that may be necessary 32% PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q55.

16 15 SECTION 4: VIEWS OF MEDICAID In contrast to opinions about Medicare and Social Security, there are clear partisan differences in assessments of Medicaid. About three-quarters of the public (77%) say the program has been good for the country, but that percentage rises to 91% of Democrats and falls to 68% of Republicans; 75% of independents say it has been good for the country. Ratings of how well Medicaid serves its constituents are considerably lower across the board (36% say it does an excellent or good job), with Democrats giving slightly better evaluations than Republicans and independents. Republicans Favor Allowing States to Cut Medicaid Eligibility Total Rep Dem Ind Medicaid % % % % Has been very good/good for the country Does an excellent/good job serving people it covers Is in excellent/good financial condition States should be able to cut eligibility Low income people should not lose benefits Other/Don t know PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q49c, Q50b, Q57. June 16-19, 2011 omnibus. PEW4c. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding. And while there is little partisan variation in the positive ratings for the program s financial condition (about 15% of all groups say it is in excellent or good shape), both Republicans and independents are significantly more likely than Democrats to say the program is in poor fiscal shape (45% of Republicans and 42% of independents, compared with 26% of Democrats). A deep partisan divide is evident in the current debate over state funding for the Medicaid program. Just 24% of Democrats would allow states to cut back on Medicaid eligibility in order to deal with their budget problems, while 73% say low income people should not lose their benefits. By contrast, a majority of Republicans (56%) say states should be able to cut their Medicaid rolls. More independents say lower income people should not lose their benefits than say states should be able to cut back on eligibility (58% vs. 38%).

17 16 Nearly three-quarters (72%) of lower-income Americans oppose allowing states to reduce Medicaid eligibility. Smaller majorities of middle-income (54%) and higherincome (51%) people take this position. Little Support for Eligibility Cuts Among Low-Income Republicans In the current debate over the Medicaid program: States should be able to cut back on eligibility for Medicaid to deal with budget problems, OR Low-income people should not have their Medicaid benefits taken away. Total Rep/Lean Rep Dem/Lean Dem Eligibility cuts No lost benefits Other/ DK Eligibility cuts No lost benefits Other/ DK Eligibility cuts No lost benefits Other/ DK % % % % % % % % % Total = = =100 $75k = = =100 $30k-$74, = = =100 <$30k = = =100 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q57. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding. More than six-in-ten (64%) Republicans and Republican-leaners with family incomes of $75,000 or more say states should be able to cut their Medicaid eligibility rolls to deal with state budget problems; 56% of Republicans and leaners with incomes between $30,000 and $75,000 say the same. But among Republicans and leaners with annual incomes under $30,000, opinion is reversed: 61% say low-income people should not lose their Medicaid benefits and just 35% say states should be able to cut back on eligibility. By contrast, two-thirds or more of all Democratic and Democratic-leaning income groups say low-income people should not lose their benefits.

18 17 SECTION 5: VIEWS OF SOCIAL SECURITY As with Medicare, an overwhelming majority (87%) says that Social Security has been good for the country. At the same time, however, just 39% say it does an excellent or good job serving the people it covers and only 18% say the program is in excellent or good financial condition. There is little variation in these evaluations by party, but Republicans and Democrats differ in their views about the program s future. Most Americans say avoiding future cuts to the program is more important than avoiding increases in Social Security taxes for workers and employers (by 56% to 33%). Two-thirds of Democrats (67%) say avoiding benefit cuts is more important; that compares with 55% of independents and 49% of Republicans. Opinions on this issue are little changed since either 2005 or Democratic and Republican opinions are nearly identical to opinions in However, independents are now less likely to prioritize avoiding benefit cuts (55% today, compared with 63% in 2005). There has been a small shift in opinion about whether the costs associated with changes in Social Security should be borne by all income groups or by those with higher incomes since Today, a slim majority (53%) says that higher income people should make these Social Security: More Are Willing to Raise Taxes than Cut Benefits Total Rep Dem Ind Social Security % % % % Has been very good/good for the country Does an excellent/good job serving people it covers Is in excellent/good financial condition It is more important to Avoid future increases in Social Security taxes Avoid future cuts to Social Security benefit amounts Both/Other/Don t know PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q49a, Q50a, Q53. June 16-19, 2011 omnibus. PEW4a. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding. Opinions about Social Security s Future Unchanged May Feb Jun In future of Social Security, more important to % % % Avoid Social Security tax increases Avoid Social Security benefit cuts Both/Other/Don t know Financial sacrifices resulting from changes in Social Security should come from People of all income levels Higher income people Other/Don t know PEW RESEARCH CENTER June Q53, Q54. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding. financial sacrifices. Twelve years ago, public opinion was evenly split (47% higher income people, 46% people of all income levels). This is primarily driven by changing attitudes among Democrats; 70% of Democrats now say the costs should fall to higher-income people, up from 51% in 1999.

19 18 Younger Republicans Say More Important to Avoid Tax Hikes Which is more important Avoiding any Social Security tax increases for workers and employers or avoiding any future cuts in Social Security benefits? Total Rep/Lean Rep Dem/Lean Dem Tax increases Future benefits Other/ DK Tax increases Future benefits Other/ DK Tax increases Future benefits Other/ DK % % % % % % % % % Total = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =100 Social Security household? Yes = = =100 No = = =100 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 15-19, Q53. Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding.

20 19 About the Surveys Most of the analysis in this report is based on telephone interviews conducted June 15-19, 2011 among a national sample of 1,502 adults 18 years of age or older living in the continental United States (1,001 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 501 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 200 who had no landline telephone). The survey was conducted by interviewers at Princeton Data Source under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International. A combination of landline and cell phone random digit dial samples were used; both samples were provided by Survey Sampling International. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Respondents in the landline sample were selected by randomly asking for the youngest adult male or female who is now at home. Interviews in the cell sample were conducted with the person who answered the phone, if that person was an adult 18 years of age or older. For detailed information about our survey methodology, see The combined landline and cell phone sample are weighted using an iterative technique that matches gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin, region, and population density to parameters from the March 2010 Census Bureau's Current Population Survey. The sample also is weighted to match current patterns of telephone status and relative usage of landline and cell phones (for those with both), based on extrapolations from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. The weighting procedure also accounts for the fact that respondents with both landline and cell phones have a greater probability of being included in the combined sample and adjusts for household size within the landline sample. Sampling errors and statistical tests of significance take into account the effect of weighting. The following table shows the sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey: Group Sample Size Plus or minus Total sample 1, percentage points Republicans percentage points Democrats percentage points Independents percentage points Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request. Some of the analysis in this report is based on telephone interviews conducted June 16-19, 2011 among a national sample of 1,003 adults 18 years of age or older living in the continental United States (670 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 333 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 128 who had no landline telephone). The survey was conducted by interviewers at Princeton Data Source under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International. A combination of landline and cell phone random digit dial samples were used; both samples were provided by Survey Sampling International. Interviews were conducted in English. Respondents in the landline sample were selected by randomly asking for the youngest adult male or female who is now at home. Interviews in the cell sample were conducted with the person who answered the phone, if that person was an adult 18 years of age or older.

21 20 The combined landline and cell phone sample are weighted using an iterative technique that matches gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin, region, and population density to parameters from the March 2010 Census Bureau's Current Population Survey. The sample also is weighted to match current patterns of telephone status, based on extrapolations from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. The weighting procedure also accounts for the fact that respondents with both landline and cell phones have a greater probability of being included in the combined sample and adjusts for household size within the landline sample. Sampling errors and statistical tests of significance take into account the effect of weighting. The following table shows the sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey: Group Sample Size Plus or minus Total sample 1, percentage points Republicans percentage points Democrats percentage points Independents percentage points Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. Pew Research Center, 2011

22 21 QUESTIONS 1-2 PREVIOUSLY RELEASED NO QUESTIONS 3-6 PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS JUNE 2011 POLITICAL SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE June 15-19, 2011 N=1502 Now thinking about the way some things work in this country Q.7 Do you think [INSERT ITEM, RANDOMIZE ITEMS a-h WITH ITEM i ALWAYS LAST OBSERVE FORM SPLITS] in this country works pretty well and requires only MINOR CHANGES, do you think it needs MAJOR CHANGES, or do you think it needs to be COMPLETELY REBUILT? What about [NEXT ITEM]? [IF NECESSARY: Does [ITEM] in this country work pretty well and require only MINOR CHANGES, need MAJOR CHANGES, or does it need to be COMPLETELY REBUILT?] Works pretty well/ Major Completely (VOL.) Only minor changes changes rebuilt DK/Ref a. The Social Security system Jun 15-19, February, January, b. The Medicare system Jun 15-19, February, c. The education system Jun 15-19, February, January, d. Immigration policy Jun 15-19, February, ASK FORM 1 ONLY [N=740]: e.f1 The tax system Jun 15-19, February, January, f.f1 The legal system Jun 15-19, February, January, ASK FORM 2 ONLY [N=762]: g.f2 The criminal justice system Jun 15-19, February, h.f2 The Homeland Security system Jun 15-19, February, i. The Medicaid system which provides health and long-term care to low income people Jun 15-19,

23 22 Q.8 Now a different kind of question. Which of the following statements comes closer to the way you feel, even if neither is exactly right. [READ] Americans Discuss Jun Soc. Sec. AARP 2011 Nov Sep Older people who can afford it need to give up some government 33 benefits to help the country overcome its economic problems The government needs to keep its promises to older people by 62 maintaining their benefits, even for those who are well-off Both/Neither/Other (VOL.) Don't know/refused (VOL.) 1 1 NO QUESTIONS 9-15, 19-29, 36, QUESTIONS 16-18, 30-35, PREVIOUSLY RELEASED Q.49 From what you know, how good a job does each of the following do serving the people it covers? (First,) does [INSERT ITEM; RANDOMIZE] do an excellent, good, only fair, or poor job serving the people it covers? How about [NEXT ITEM]? [IF NECESSARY: Does [ITEM] do an excellent, good, only fair, or poor job serving the people it covers?]] [NOTE: If respondent says they are not covered by the program, prompt Just your impression from what you know about it. ] Only (VOL.) Excellent Good fair Poor DK/Ref a. Social Security Jun 15-19, b. Medicare, which provides health care to seniors and people with permanent disabilities Jun 15-19, c. Medicaid, which provides health and long-term care to low income people Jun 15-19, d. Private health insurance Jun 15-19, Q.50 And from what you know about its financial condition, is [INSERT; RANDOMIZE] in excellent, good, only fair, or poor shape financially? How about [NEXT ITEM]? [IF NECESSARY: Is [ITEM] in excellent, good, only fair, or poor shape financially?] Only (VOL.) Excellent Good fair Poor DK/Ref a. Social Security Jun 15-19, November 1997 trend conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates for Americans Discuss Social Security. Question was part of a list and began I m going to read some pairs of statements that give different views on some of these subjects. For each pair, please tell me which statement, A or B, comes closer to the way you feel. September 1992 question was part of a list and began People today have many different views about politics, government and social problems. I m going to read some pairs of statements that give different views on some of these subjects. Of course, these subjects are complicated, and no statement will capture exactly how you feel. For each pair, please tell me which statement, A or B, comes closer to the way you feel.

24 23 Q.50 CONTINUED Only (VOL.) Excellent Good fair Poor DK/Ref b. Medicare Jun 15-19, c. Medicaid Jun 15-19, Q.51 What is more important, taking steps to reduce the budget deficit or keeping Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are? Jun Feb Taking steps to reduce the budget deficit Keeping Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are 70 4 Both equally (VOL.) 2 5 Don't know/refused (VOL.) 4 NO QUESTION 52 RANDOMIZE Q.53 AND Q.54 Thinking specifically about Social Security Q.53 Which do you think is MORE important when it comes to Social Security s future [READ AND RANDOMIZE] Americans Discuss Soc. Sec 3. Jun Feb May Feb Aug Avoiding any Social Security tax increases 33 for workers and employers Avoiding any future cuts in Social Security 56 benefit amounts Both/Neither/Other (VOL.) Don t know/refused (VOL.) RANDOMIZE Q.53 AND Q.54 Q.54 If there are financial sacrifices that come with changing Social Security [READ AND RANDOMIZE] Americans Discuss Soc. Sec 6. Jun May Feb Aug Should people of all income levels share 42 in the financial sacrifices Should higher income people who can most 53 afford it make the financial sacrifices Both/Neither/Other (VOL.) Don t know/refused (VOL.) Question was asked as part of a list and began People have different opinions about how the Social Security system might be changed for the future. We d like your opinion on what policymakers priorities should be when they are making decisions about Social Security s future. Question began When decisions about Social Security s future are being made, which do you think is more important? In 2005 and Americans Discuss Social Security trend, first response option read Avoiding any tax increases for workers and employers. Question was asked as part of a list and began People have different opinions about how the Social Security system might be changed for the future. We d like your opinion on what policymakers priorities should be when they are making decisions about Social Security s future. Response options were Having people of all income levels share in the financial sacrifices that might come with changing the Social Security program and Having those who can most afford it higher income people make the financial sacrifices that might come with changing the Social Security program.

25 24 Q.55 From what you know about the Medicare program that provides health care for seniors and people with permanent disabilities, does the program make it [READ; RANDOMIZE OPTIONS 1 AND 2 WITH 3 ALWAYS LAST] Jun Too easy to get medical care and treatments that may not be necessary 32 Too difficult to get medical care and treatments that may be necessary 40 [OR] Is Medicare coverage about right 1 Other/Mixed (VOL.) 11 Don't know/refused (VOL.) Q.56 Which comes closer to your view, even if neither is exactly right? [READ AND RANDOMIZE] Jun People on Medicare need to be responsible for more of the costs of their 31 health care in order to keep the program financially secure 61 People on Medicare already pay enough of the cost of their health care * Both (VOL.) 1 Neither (VOL.) * Other (VOL.) 6 Don't know/refused (VOL.) Q.57 And one question about a current debate over the MEDICAID program for low income people. Which comes closer to your view? [READ AND RANDOMIZE] Jun States should be able to cut back on who is eligible for Medicaid 37 in order to deal with budget problems 58 Low income people should not have their Medicaid benefits taken away * Both (VOL.) 1 Neither (VOL.) 1 Other (VOL.) 2 Don't know/refused (VOL.) NO QUESTIONS Q.60 Please tell me whether you or anyone in your household currently receives [INSERT ITEM]? What about [INSERT ITEM; RANDOMIZE]?... (VOL.) Yes No DK/Ref a. Social Security payments Jun 15-19, b. Medicare benefits Jun 15-19, c. Medicaid benefits Jun 15-19,

26 25 Q.61 Are you or someone in your household covered by a private health insurance plan, such as insurance provided through an employer or purchased for an individual or family? Jun Yes 28 No 1 Don t know/refused (VOL.) NO QUESTIONS 62-71, 76 QUESTIONS 72-75, PREVIOUSLY RELEASED PARTY In politics TODAY, do you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat, or independent? ASK IF INDEP/NO PREF/OTHER/DK/REF (PARTY=3,4,5,9): PARTYLN As of today do you lean more to the Republican Party or more to the Democratic Party? (VOL.) (VOL.) No Other (VOL.) Lean Lean Republican Democrat Independent preference party DK/Ref Rep Dem Jun 15-19, * May 25-30, * Mar 30-Apr 3, * Mar 8-14, * Feb 22-Mar 1, * Feb 2-7, * Jan 5-9, * Dec 1-5, Nov 4-7, * Oct 27-30, Oct 13-18, * Aug 25-Sep 6, * Jul 21-Aug 5, * Jun 16-20, Yearly Totals Post-Sept Pre-Sept

27 26 TEAPARTY2 From what you know, do you agree or disagree with the Tea Party movement, or don t you have an opinion either way? (VOL.) Not No opinion Haven t (VOL.) heard of/ Agree Disagree either way heard of Refused DK Jun 15-19, May 25-30, Mar 30-Apr 3, Mar 8-14, Feb 22-Mar 1, Feb 2-7, Jan 5-9, Dec 1-5, Nov 4-7, Oct 27-30, 2010 (RVs) Oct 13-18, 2010 (RVs) Aug 25-Sep 6, 2010 (RVs) Jul 21-Aug 5, Jun 16-20, * 27 May 20-23, Mar 11-21, In the February 2-7, 2011 survey and before, question read do you strongly agree, agree, disagree or strongly disagree with the Tea Party movement In October 2010 and earlier, question was asked only of those who had heard or read a lot or a little about the Tea Party. In May through October, it was described as: the Tea Party movement that has been involved in campaigns and protests in the U.S. over the past year. In March it was described as the Tea Party protests that have taken place in the U.S. over the past year.

28 27 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 16-19, 2011 OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,003 PEW.1-PEW.3 PREVIOUSLY RELEASED PEW.4 Now thinking about some programs, please tell me if over the years you think each has been very good, good, bad, or very bad for the country [INSERT ITEM a FIRST, RANDOMIZE ITERMS b,c] How about [NEXT ITEM]? [IF NECESSARY: Has [ITEM] been very good, good, bad, or very bad for the country]? Very good Good Bad Very bad (VOL.) DK/Ref a. Social Security June 16-19, February, b. Medicare, which provides health care to seniors and people with permanent disabilities June 16-19, c. Medicaid, which provides health and long-term care to low-income people June 16-19, PEW.5 And how much if anything, have you heard about each of the following programs in the news recently? Have you heard a lot, a little or nothing at all? [INSERT ITEM; RANDOMIZE] Nothing at all (VOL.) DK/Ref A lot A little a. Social Security June 16-19, * b. Medicare June 16-19, a. Medicaid June 16-19, Item was not asked as part of a list.