1 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR INVOLVING NON-STATE ACTORS IN THE COUNTRY PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK (CPF)
2 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR INVOLVING NON-STATE ACTORS IN THE COUNTRY PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK (CPF) Office for Partnerships, Advocacy and Capacity Development (OPC)
3 2 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR INVOLVING NON-STATE ACTORS IN THE COUNTRY PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK (CPF) This document complements the FAO guidelines for the Country Programming Framework (CPF). Its purpose is to guide FAO staff preparing and reviewing the CPFs in involving key stakeholders at the country level. Specifically, these guidelines illustrate how to engage civil society organizations and the private sector in the CPF process.
4 Contents 3 1. Purpose of the document Background and rationale Non-state actors and the Country Programming Framework Process Areas of engagement and collaboration with non-state actors Civil Society and FAO Selecting CSOs to be involved in the CPF process Ensuring a balanced representation of Civil Society The Private Sector and FAO Considerations when involving Private Sector in the CPF Checklist for involving non-state actors in CPF process... 10
6 1. Purpose of the document 5 The Country Programming Framework (CPF) is the tool used by FAO to define the medium-term response to the assistance needs of member countries in pursuit of national development objectives that are consistent with the FAO Strategic Framework and Regional Priorities, the MDGs and other Internationally Agreed Development Goals (IADGs). The CPF is developed in close partnership with governments, taking into account national priorities on agriculture, food security and rural development. At the same time, and in order to ensure the broad ownership of the process, it is essential to ensure the meaningful engagement of a broad and diverse range of stakeholders in the design of the CPF. The situation analysis during the formulation process detailed in the CPF guidelines 1 looks into the national socio-economic development issues, challenges, national priorities, and key relevant stakeholders as well as their capacities at policy, organizational and individual levels. The CPF formulation and implementation process opens the way to enhance partnerships with governments, national stakeholders, external partners and UN system agencies at the country level. Meaningful engagement of a diverse range of stakeholders in the design, formulation and implementation of the CPF is encouraged to ensure the broadest ownership of this process and allies in the fight against food security. Moreover, in April 2013 member states approved the FAO strategy for partnerships with the private sector and the FAO strategy for partnerships with civil society organizations (CSOs) 2. During the consultation process to finalize and approve both strategies, member states expressed interest in ensuring the CPF be used as the main instrument for implementing the strategies at the decentralized level. This document provides FAO staff with indications on how to engage in the CPF process two key categories of non-state actors: the private sector and the civil society. The document will guide FAO staff by identifying criteria to consider when working with these two categories of stakeholders and provide a checklist of critical steps to be followed to ensure their involvement at each stage of the CPF process. 1 See Situation Analysis in page 30 of the CPF guidelines: ftp://ftp.fao.org/tc/cpf/guidelines/cpfguidelines.pdf 2 FAO strategy for partnerships with the private sector: FAO strategy for partnerships with the Civil Society Organizations:
7 6 It is structured as follows: i) An introduction on the role of CSOs and the private sector in the CPF process including background and rationale for engagement; ii) Areas of collaboration for both CSOs and the private sector as defined in the two FAO partnership strategies; iii) Selection of CSOs and how to ensure a balanced representation of civil society; iv) Issues to consider when working with the private sector; v) A checklist of steps to take when involving non-state actors in the CPF process.
8 2. Background and rationale 7 Poverty, hunger and malnutrition have persisted despite numerous efforts made by countries, organizations and institutions to eradicate them. Many of the food-related crises of recent years are evidence that these problems are becoming increasingly interconnected. This means that the solution cannot simply be to intervene on isolated symptoms of a larger, more complex and multifaceted problem. It also means that efforts to tackle these issues cannot be solely of one organization or institution. This reuires the decisions, perspectives, capacities, knowledge, skills and influence of multiple actors in order to achieve the common goal of a world free from hunger. Numerous actors have been involved in areas complementary to FAO s mandate, in particular CSOs 3 and private sector stakeholders 4. Depending on their level of coordination and activity, civil society can range from extensive networks and platforms involving key interest groups (farmers, fishers, herders etc.) to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community-based associations. Each country presents different levels of coordination and organization of non-state actors. For example, in some countries, there is already a food security forum where UN, government, development partners and NGOs meet regularly and discuss. In this case, it is feasible to expand the involvement of NGOs to other types of Civil Society Organizations and seek a more balanced representativeness through interest groups or constituencies. Private sector entities can be informal or formal, usually depending on the status of their registration according to government regulations. Private sector entities range in size and scope from small local businesses through to global multinational companies. Each country presents different levels of coordination and organization of their non-state actors 5. For example, in the Dominican Republic, an Inter-Institutional Committee on Food and Nutritional Security was established in 2011 where UN, government, development partners and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) meet regularly and discuss solutions to food insecurity. In this case, it is feasible to expand the involvement of NGOs to other types of civil society organizations and seek a more balanced representativeness through interest groups or constituencies. 3 The new FAO Strategy for Partnerships with Civil Society identifies three types of civil society organizations: member-based organizations (MBOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and social movements (SMs). 4 The FAO Strategy for Partnerships with the Private Sector considers the private sector as encompassing a broad array of entities that range from farmer organizations, cooperatives, small and medium enterprises to the largest international corporations. Private sector stakeholders also include private financial institutions, industry and trade associations, and consortia that represent private sector interests. 5 It is the reality on the ground that shapes the level of collaboration of the different stakeholders in the CPF.
9 8 In other cases, private sector entities may be members of chambers of commerce, industry federations, associations of producers or exporters, or other consortia which play a coordination role, particularly helpful if used for discussing policy matters. The successful drafting and review of the different CPFs, should allow FAO to take into account the reality of the civil society and private sector and through close dialogue with the Government 6, seeking whenever possible their engagement in the CPF process. 6 Each country presents a different challenge. The present documents provides FAO staff with useful tips on how to involved Non State Actors (Civil Society and Private Sector ) in the CPF. However, it is the reality on the ground what ultimately shapes the level of collaboration of the different stakeholders in the CPF.
10 3. Non-state actors and the Country Programming Framework Process 9 The CPFs define the priorities for collaboration between FAO and governments and the outcomes to be achieved in the medium-term (4-5 years, aligned to national planning cycles) in support of national agriculture, rural development and food security development objectives as expressed in national development plans. As stated in FAO s Reviewed Strategic Framework, hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition cannot be eradicated without a strong and effective political commitment and a high degree of collaboration among all the actors concerned: Building political commitment among stakeholders implies awareness raising and advocacy on the one hand, and the establishment and strengthening of multi-stakeholder partnerships that would inter alia ensure monitoring and accountability on the other. The Committee on World Food Security (CFS) as a multi-stakeholder global forum could serve as a model. While civil society and the private sector are increasingly involved in FAO s work at global and regional level, much more needs to be done at the national level. To ensure consistency with the new corporate approach on strengthening multi-stakeholder partnerships to enhance the inclusiveness and effectiveness of FAO s work at all levels, a much greater space needs to be opened for the full participation of the private sector and civil society organizations and platforms in the CPF process. 3.1 Areas of engagement and collaboration with non-state actors Specific areas of engagement and collaboration with non-state actors include: Development and technical programmes: to strengthen local capabilities and project outreach in a cost-effective manner, dialogue and partnership should be promoted with non-state actors to design, implement, and monitor uality and sustainable local initiatives, programmes, projects and emergency responses. Non-state actors can complement FAO s technical work and programmes it develops at the local level. They can also complement government programmes. Policy dialogue: the participation of non-state actors in policy dialogue nurtures a sense of ownership that will enhance sustainability of policy adoption and implementation. It allows for civil society and private sector interests to be heard. FAO can play a role in encouraging and guiding dialogue in multi-stakeholder fora. Norms and standard setting: FAO plays a key convenor and facilitator role in the negotiation and implementation of international codes of conduct, safety and uality standards for food and other commodities, global conventions and regulatory frameworks in areas related to FAO s mandate. The involvement of non-state actors from both civil society and the private sector in their design and implementation is critical to their success.
11 10 Advocacy and communication: engaging both civil society and the private sector in FAO s advocacy and communication activities can allow the Organization to reach a wider audience, with a strengthened scope and impact across broader sections of the population. They can jointly raise public awareness and build strong support and political will in the fight against poverty and food insecurity. For example, campaigns such as the Eat Safely campaign launched by the regional office in Latin America benefitted greatly from partnerships with the World Community Radio Association and Latin American Education Radio Association. Knowledge management, sharing, dissemination and capacity development: non-state actors can have substantial roles in contributing to FAO s work in this area. The private sector for example contributes to FAO s knowledge and research capacity by providing data and information on market trends and emerging technologies. FAO s partnerships with civil society can facilitate the flow of global knowledge, making it accessible to all sectors of society. FAO can also capitalize on the detailed knowledge CSOs have from the grassroots to the regional, which complements the stock of knowledge and technical expertise that FAO promotes. Mobilization of resources and joint use of resources in emergency situations: mobilization of human, financial and other resources is fundamental to the implementation of FAO s programme of work. Private sector entities may provide human, logistical, managerial and financial resources to specific activities in various ways, e.g. know-how, expert services, in-kind donations, or funds. Partnerships with a range of civil society actors, from large international and national NGOs to grassroots organizations, can leverage a wide variety of contacts and resources, human and financial, which may be very effective, including in emergency situations.
12 4. Civil Society and FAO 11 Civil society is made up of women, youth, farmers, herders, fishers and fish workers, indigenous peoples, forest dwellers and more, many of whom are often FAO s beneficiaries. Civil society organizations (CSOs) bring together the voices of these groups, reach the most marginalized groups of society, and bring the positions and concerns of people to policy dialogue, normative discussions and programme and project design. These organizations can play a catalytic role in improving and furthering the work of FAO, and vice versa, especially in the area of food security. For example, establishing CSO advisory groups at the national level as a sounding board to FAO s policy and programme initiatives is a mechanism other UN agencies have implemented. CSOs have increasingly shown their capacities and potential in programme and project design, execution and implementation at regional, national and sub-national levels. In recent years these organizations have succeeded in opening up areas for dialogue with governments and other actors at regional and global level, which are now either consolidated or institutionalized into governance fora, thus contributing their capacities and expertise to higher uality policy and normative discussions. FAO acknowledges these achievements by civil society, as well as the effectiveness of new governance models to discuss and implement public policies in the fight against malnutrition. For example, in Jamaica CSOs are engaged in developing an action plan as an input to the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy. Civil society is much more than just large NGOs 7. There are multiple types of organizations across different constituencies (farmers; pastoralists and herders; fishers and fish workers; forest dwellers; consumers; landless; urban poor; NGOs; women; youth; agricultural workers; and indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities), and a balanced representation of these organizations in policy dialogue and normative discussion is essential for the empowerment, ownership, success and sustainability of any decisions made or actions executed. While at the global level different policy fora have been progressively including civil society in discussions, at the national level key policy discussions, with some exceptions, tend to be held without involving relevant CSOs. FAO is convinced that multi-stakeholder dialogues at the national level involving representatives of the most vulnerable and marginalized sectors of the population are to be encouraged and supported. 7 NGOs are considered one of the interest groups or constituencies that make up the overall civil society in any given country. In the past, working with NGOs was synonymous with working with civil society. Today, non-governmental organizations are one fraction of the civil society in a country and therefore are considered as a constituency or interest group of their own.
13 Selecting CSOs to be involved in the CPF process Two key aspects need to be considered when selecting CSOs in the CPF process: 1) Technical expertise on matters related with agriculture, natural resources and food security 2) Representativeness While the first can be easily assessed by FAO experts, the following section can help ensuring a balanced representation of specific sectors of the population who share common interests, with particular reference to the most vulnerable and isolated groups, whose livelihoods and food security are likely to be most directly affected by the interventions that FAO and the governments carry out in support of rural development Ensuring a balanced representation of Civil Society Four main criteria need to be considered when seeking the balanced representativeness of civil society. These are: constituencies, geography, gender/age and type of organization. Constituencies: Selection of civil society participants must meet the reuirements needed for a balanced representation. Twelve different constituencies have been identified as the main groups of FAO beneficiaries. These 12 constituencies ensure that the different interests, voices and concerns of society are included. These are: small farmers, landless, agricultural workers, fishers and fish workers, pastoralists and herders, forest dwellers, ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples, urban poor, consumers, NGOs, women and youth. To ensure that this component is duly taken into account, at least 75% of the above mentioned constituencies should be represented by at least one organization in CPF activities and processes. Geography: Eual participation must be ensured from each of the regions, provinces and/or districts of the country, as appropriate. Balanced geographical representation of organizations must be ensured if the process is to be labeled as COUNTRY Programming Framework. As in the case of constituencies, 75% of geographical areas should be represented by at least one civil society organization. Type of organization: A balance of all three types of civil society organizations (NGOs, social movements and member-based organizations) should be considered. Gender and Age: A gender and age balance is of particular importance, ideally 50% of the representatives from civil society should be women, and at least 1/3 youth. FAO funding: Priority in funding must be given to producer organizations, peoples organizations, social movements and civil society networks and member-based organizations, especially those representing small-scale farmers, fishers, artisans, pastoralists, indigenous peoples, landless, rural workers, consumers, women and youth. INGOs and strong national NGOs tend to have enough resources to be able to support their own expenses. Funding from FAO should be limited to one participant per organization 8. 8 If multiple representatives from the same organization want to participate, they must find alternative sources of funding. More than one participant from the same organization may attend a meeting or process, provided there is enough space and under the condition that only one of their representatives may speak per discussion point.representatives may speak per discussion point.
14 5. The Private Sector and FAO 13 In recent decades, food and agriculture systems have been transformed by new technological, knowledge-based, financial and managerial resources and innovation, as well as by consolidation and globalization of supply chains. The private sector has been instrumental in driving these transformations. Private sector entities play important roles in virtually every dimension of FAO s mission and mandate at global, regional and country levels. For FAO to engage effectively with the private sector in the fight against food insecurity, much collaboration will start at the grassroots level in a bottom-up approach that builds on well-established local relationships. Regional and decentralized offices play a great role in building partnerships with the private sector. In fact, agricultural development and production are core private enterprise activities. The private sector can thus potentially contribute to lifting large numbers of people in developing countries out of poverty and hunger through responsible and productive investment, innovation, enhanced efficiency and employment creation. One of the roles of governments is to create enabling environments for the private sector to optimize their role in rural development. FAO is well positioned to facilitate dialogue and collaboration between the public and the private sector.
15 14 Examples of collaboration with the private sector in the CPF may be the setting up of national steering committees with participation of concerned government departments, ministries, FAO, and relevant private sector stakeholders. Further, CPFs may be fostered through private sector voluntary contributions to FAO projects aimed at supporting mutually agreed technical activities in the country. FAO could also engage in strategic dialogue with national industry associations and federations through joint organization of multi-stakeholder forums on specific topics (forestry, agriculture, fisheries) related to policy work done by FAO. Other ways of involving the private sector in the CPFs can include direct involvement of business representatives in FAO normative work at the national level to debate and develop responsible and transparent trade and market access rules (e.g. certification reuirements and standards), for example in the case of fisheries. Private sector contributions may also include organization of training workshops, publication of technical manuals to improve knowledge and disseminate best practices in food and agriculture, for instance in area of land and property rights related issues. FAO may also seek private sector assistance in establishing school feeding programmes in consultation with national governments wishing to develop such initiatives. Closer collaboration with the private sector in the CPF will therefore result in increased investment and innovation in agriculture; strengthened local agribusiness and enhanced efficiency in the supply chain; access to topical information, management and dissemination of knowledge, extension services (particularly technology transfer), data and scientific innovation Considerations when involving Private Sector in the CPF Selecting private sector representatives (companies, federations, associations, or member organizations) that are able to bring added value to FAO s work is crucial. All FAO collaborations and partnerships with the private sector must comply with the following principles: a) Alignment with UN guidelines and international agreements: Compliance and alignment with common UN guidelines is a prereuisite for a mutual beneficial partnership; b) Conformity with FAO s mission, mandate, objectives and work programme. Partnership activities must be consistent with FAO s mandate and should enhance the effectiveness of its work programme. c) Common objectives and mutual benefits: A prereuisite of a partnership is alignment in mission and mandate, as well as long-term objectives;
16 15 d) Non-exclusivity with no preferential treatment, unfair advantage or endorsement: No contribution may be construed as an FAO endorsement of any product or service, nor will FAO enter into any agreement that excludes the right to negotiate similar arrangements with other partners. e) Neutrality and integrity: Partnerships must ensure that the neutrality of the Organization is maintained and the integrity, independence and reputation of FAO are not put at risk. f) Accountability of all parties with clear and agreed responsibilities: Partnership activities will be designed and implemented in a manner that ensures clear and agreed responsibilities and accountability by all partners; g) Transparency: Joint FAO/private sector initiatives will be fully transparent. Information on agreed activities will be publicly available and may be reported in documents to FAO s governing bodies. h) Sustainability: Partnership activities should be planned to promote economic, environmental and social sustainability and to make optimum use of a partner s resources. A mutually agreed process for the monitoring and evaluation of partnership projects should be built into the project design; i) Respect for intellectual property in delivery of public goods: There will be consultation and prior agreement between FAO and private sector partners regarding specific activities that could generate material subject to copyright, patent or other intellectual property jurisdiction; j) Scientific credibility and innovation: Partnership activities should be defensible in terms of objective scientific judgment. FAO will further develop this principle to ensure that scientific credibility is protected.
17 16 6. Checklist for involving non-state actors in CPF process The table below provides details on how a meaningful participation of non-state actors can be reached throughout the range of activities in the CPF formulation process, outlined in greater detail in the Guide to the formulation of the CPF..
18 17 PHASE 1: Starting phase 1. Government and FAO agree to start the CFS process 1.1. Identify relevant civil society organizations and private sector entities that should be included in the process. The Partnerships Unit (OPCP) of the Office for Partnerships, Advocacy and Capacity Development (OPC), as well as its focal points at regional and subregional level, can provide guidance on how to identify relevant key entities, associations and platforms to be involved, and/or facilitate the contact between them and FAO. Tool 1 Stakeholder Analysis could be used as well Contact the relevant stakeholders identified and inform them about the launch of the CPF process and their expected involvement Receive and collect feedback from the stakeholders contacted. 2. Mobilization of financial resources for CPF formulation 2.1. Include budget lines for the realization of the consultative processes needed to allow a meaningful participation of different stakeholders during the CPF process. 3. Establishment of a CPF Country Core Team lead by the FAORep and the Steering Committee led by the government 3.1. Identify and integrate relevant national civil society and private sector representatives in the Core Team, paying particular attention to small food producers. This is in line with current global governance models being championed by FAO at global and regional levels. The Partnerships Unit (OPCP) of the Office for Partnerships, Advocacy and Capacity Development (OPC), as well as its focal points at regional and subregional level, can provide guidance on how to identify relevant key entities, associations and platforms to be involved, and/or facilitate the contact between them and FAO Encourage the establishment of a Steering Committee including a wider representation of relevant civil society and private sector representatives to oversee the formulation process, enhancing effectiveness and accountability.
19 18 4. Preparation of a concept note 4.1. Include in the concept note the list of the stakeholders that have been consulted and that are involved in the CPF process Describe which consultative processes will take place to ensure the participation of stakeholders in the CPF process Describe how these consultative processes will take place Describe what the expected results of these consultative processes are Describe how these results will be integrated in the CPF process. 5. Validation of the concept note 5.1. Consult the Partnerships Unit (OPCP) of the Office for Partnerships, Advocacy and Capacity Development (OPC), and its focal points at regional and subregional level with respect to the involvement of non-state actors in the process of CPF formulation Integrate the comments suggested by OPC regarding the participation of non-state actors in the CPF process. Tool 7 Quality Assurance Review Procedure could be used, as well as contacting OPCP, and the regional partnerships Focal points in each FAO regional office.
20 19 PHASE 2: Setting Priorities 6. Situation Analysis 6.1. Include age, ethnicity (and/or caste), and sex-disaggregated data in the analysis Include consideration of assessments, by different stakeholders, of the socio-economic development issues and challenges and national priorities, as well as of the existing capacities at policy, organizational and individual levels to address those challenges Consult OPCP Regional Focal point, as well as OPCP Focal points and SRO. 7. Assessing Comparative Advantages 7.1. Consider FAO s comparative advantage in providing an impartial and neutral setting where different stakeholders can meet and discuss Consider the comparative advantage of CSOs in improving and furthering the work of FAO, reaching the most marginalized groups of society, bringing to the table perspectives from the realities in the field, and increasing the ownership, accountability and sustainability of CPF processes Consider the comparative advantage of private sector stakeholders, including federations and associations in generating responsible and productive investment and innovation in agriculture; strengthened local agribusiness; enhanced efficiency in the supply chain; creation of decent rural employment; access to topical information and expertise; management and dissemination of knowledge and lessons learned; enhanced extension services (particularly technology transfer); data and scientific innovation and advances; increased entrepreneurship at country level resulting in job creation; implementation of sustainable business practices embodied in corporate social responsibility (CSR) Assess the existing capacity within the FAO Representation to work in synergy with a variety of national stakeholders Build and develop capacity within the FAO Representation to work in synergy with a variety of national stakeholders.
21 20 8. Prioritizing FAO s work: the Priority Matrix 8.1. Consider properly in the matrix FAO s core functions of facilitate, promote and support better governance and policy dialogue for development of effectiveness at global, regional and country levels and facilitate partnerships for food and nutrition security, agriculture and rural development between governments, development partners, civil society and the private sector Involve civil society and private sector representatives in a dialogue from which prioritization criteria will emerge Reflect the needs, priorities and constraints emerged from the dialogue with civil society and private sector representatives in the priority matrix as appropriate. 9. Validation of CPF Strategic Priority Areas 9.1. Ensure that civil society and private sector representatives play an active role in the validation and endorsement of the priority areas identified.
22 21 PHASE 3: Programming for Results 1. Building the CPF Results Matrix 1.1. Ensure that outcomes and outputs of the CPF results matrix take into due consideration the views of relevant stakeholders and reflect their needs, priorities and constraints. 2. M&E and Implementation Arrangements 2.1. Reflect in the M&E Plan that national stakeholders are fully involved at all stages of the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the CPF Include in the M&E Plan the roles, responsibilities and the type and level of engagement of the stakeholders involved Include in the M&E Plan, as well as in CPF reviews and reports, a detailed description of the processes of consultation with national stakeholders during the implementation, monitoring and evaluation stages of the CPF. 3. Validation and endorsement of the CPF 3.1. Involve OPCP and its focal points at regional and subregional level in the validation process of the CPF document. For more information: Please check the partnerships web page: partnerships/en/ Contact Chief OPCP for matters related to the involvement of private sector and Civil Society Organizations in the work of FAO.
June 2017 C 2017/LIM/4 Rev.1 E CONFERENCE Fortieth Session Rome, 3-8 July 2017 Medium Term Plan 2018-21 and Programme of Work and Budget 2018-19 (Draft Resolution) This document: I) provides an extract
CPF a guide to the formulation of the Country Programming Framework (CPF) The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion
Mainstreaming gender perspectives in national budgets: an overview Presented by Carolyn Hannan Director, Division for the Advancement of Women Department of Economic and Social Affairs at the roundtable
What is EACSOF? East Africa Civil Society Organizations Forum (EACSOF) is the only inclusive platform for all CSOs in East Africa. EACSOF was founded in 2007, with a Vision of an empowered citizenry in
OECD Report to G7 Leaders on Responsible Business Conduct This note describes work undertaken by the OECD to support the implementation of the 2015 G7 Leaders Declaration in the area of responsible business
Country brief MALAWI Debt and Aid Management Division Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Development October 2014 Contacts: email@example.com / firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com
Tracking Government Investments for Nutrition at Country Level Patrizia Fracassi, Clara Picanyol, 03 rd July 2014 1. Introduction Having reliable data is essential to policy makers to prioritise, to plan,
6 th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Towards Participatory and Transparent Governance 24 27 May 2005, Seoul, Republic of Korea CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP AIDE MEMOIRE AUDITING FOR SOCIAL CHANGE
United Nations Fund for Recovery Reconstruction and Development in Darfur (UNDF) Terms of Reference 29 March 2013 1 Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. Purpose, Scope and Principles of the UNDF... 4 III.
The DAC s main findings and recommendations Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews Luxembourg 2017 Luxembourg has strengthened its development co-operation programme The committee concluded
UNICEF s Strategic Planning Processes Outline of the Presentation Overview The Strategic Plan: The (current) Strategic Plan 2014-2017 Findings from the Mid Term review of the Strategic Plan 2014-2017 Preparing
Proposed Luxembourg-WHO collaboration: Supporting policy dialogue on national health policies, strategies and plans in West Africa I. INTRODUCTION Effective national health systems require national health
EAF-Nansen Project (GCP/INT/003/NOR) Title : Improving the Artisanal Fisheries Management of Liberia and Sierra Leone Funded: EAF-Nansen Total Contribution: USD 50,000 1 Countries: Duration: Liberia and
Environment for the MDGs ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE MDGS: RESHAPING THE DEVELOPMENT AGENDA A Poverty Environment Partnership Event in support of the UN High Level Event on MDGs UNDP-UNEP Poverty-Environment
December, 2011 GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE STRATEGIC CLIMATE FUND Adopted November 2008 and amended December 2011 Table of Contents A. Introduction B. Purpose and Objectives C. SCF Programs D. Governance
Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Monitoring Framework INDICATOR 8: Countries have transparent systems to track public allocations for gender equality and women s empowerment Methodology
The Sustainable Stock Exchanges Initiative An Overview for Issuers and Investors ADVANCED SUPPLY CHAIN COMPLIANCE SERIES March 14, 2017 Michael Littenberg Michael Littenberg is a partner in the securities
Terms of reference GENERAL INFORMATION Title: Governance and Institutional Expert _CPEIR Bangka Belitung (Indonesian National) Project Name : Environment Unit/ Sustainable Development Financing (SDF) SIDA
1 INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II) 2014-2020 Multi-country European Integration Facility Action Summary The objective of the EU Integration Facility is to assist the IPA II beneficiaries
IDP REVIEW PROCESS PLAN DEPARTMENT OF THE OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER JULY 2009-JUNE2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Roles and responsibilities 2.1 Council
Division for Europe STRATEGY FOR THE TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME IN THE EUROPE REGION (As adopted at the Europe Region National Liaison Officers Meeting, Vienna, Austria, on 19 February 2010) I. BACKGROUND
8 Mauritania ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION PRLP Programme Regional de Lutte contre la Pauvreté (Regional Program for Poverty Reduction) History and Context Mauritania s Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)
EU FUNDING PROGRAMMES IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPMENT AID EU FORDERUNG FUR MIGRANTEN ORGANISATIONEN UND TRAGER DER PARTICIPATIONS UND INTEGRATIONS ARBEIT IN BERLIN MOVE GLOBAL 25 October 2014, Berlin About
THE EGYPTIAN EXCHANGE (EGX)- COMMUNICATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS Last updated on: [Jan 2015] BUSINESS STRATEGY 1. How does your exchange define and view the rationale for corporate sustainability and the exchange's
The United Nations Social Protection Floor Joint Team in Thailand A replicable experience for other UN Country Teams The aim of this brochure is to share with the United Nations Development Group (UNDG)
Indicative Guidelines for Country-Specific Resource Mobilization Strategies I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. In decision IX/11 B, the Conference of the Parties adopted the strategy for resource mobilization (SRM)
THIRD GLOBAL CALL FOR PROPOSALS PROJECT PROPOSAL PAPER FOR GPSA GRANT US$ 800,000 TO OXFAM NOVIB NIGER FOR A Strengthening the Social Contract in Niger Budgets are More than Money In, Money Out! Project
Pan American Health Organization World Health Organization Basic Sanitation Program Division of Health and Environment METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING SECTORAL ANALYSIS IN WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION
Regional Labour Market Monitoring in Public Private Dialogue in Egypt: Approach, Overview and Outcomes Focusing on Gender Inclusion and Female Employment Creation Laura Schmid Advisor Employment Promotion
Strengthening Multisectoral Governance for Nutrition Deborah Ash, Kavita Sethuraman, Hanifa Bachou Components of Multisectoral Nutrition Governance National Level Enabling Environment for Nutrition Political
BSP/C/16/NGO/77 Reply to the Consultation of Member States and Associate Members, including their National Commissions for UNESCO, as well as of intergovernmental organizations and international non-governmental
FOLLOW-UP TO THE INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF FAO RESOLUTION 1/2008 AND IMMEDIATE PLAN OF ACTION FOR FAO RENEWAL (IPA) Extracts from the Report of the 35 th (Special) Session of the FAO Conference
Aide-Mémoire Draft 15 December, 2005 AID MODALITIES AND THE PROMOTION OF GENDER EQUALITY Joint meeting of Inter-Agency Network on Women and Gender Equality (IANWGE) and OECD-DAC Network on Gender Equality
Validation of MAURITANIA Validation Report Sustainable Development Strategies Group (SDSG), Independent Validator 20 January 2017 1. BACKGROUND Mauritania borders Algeria, Senegal, and Mali in northwest
ONE WASH NATIONAL PROGRAMME (OWNP) ONE Plan ONE Budget ONE Report planning with linked strategic and annual WASH plans at each level budgeting re ecting all WASH-related investments and expenditures financial
FAO International Workshop on Food Security in Complex Emergencies: building policy frameworks to address longer-term programming challenges Tivoli, 23-25 September 2003 Food security and linking relief,
Experiences of policies and practices of empowering older people in Africa Amleset Tewodros Expert Group Meeting on Policies and Strategies to Promote the Empowerment of People in Achieving Poverty Eradication,
Session 6: Element D: Reporting, Monitoring And Review: Experiences And Lessons Learnt From National Climate Change Programme And NAPA Implementation In Malawi Aloysius M. Kamperewera [PhD] Ministry of
Community Based Monitoring System CBMS Network Evan Due, IDRC Singapore Outline of Presentation What is CBMS Rationale for Development of CBMS Key Features of CBMS Case Presentation: CBMS in the Philippines
Annex I WSSCC, Global Sanitation Fund (GSF) Terms of Reference Country Programme Monitor (CPM) BURKINA FASO 1 Background The Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC) was established in
EVIDENCE AND OUTCOME BASED POLICY PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE AFRICA AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (CAADP) OUSMANE BADIANE Director for Africa International Food Policy Research
Child Budget in Bangladesh Report Summary of the Child Budget in Bangladesh Report, June 2014 Introduction The report initiated by the Centre for Services and Information on Disability, and supported by
DG Enlargement Guidelines for EU support to civil society in enlargement countries, 2014-2020 1. CIVIL SOCIETY AND PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY The Treaty on the European Union (Article 49) establishes that
Coordination and Implementation of the National AIDS Response Iris Semini, MENA RST Yvonne Nkrumah, ASAP Oussama Tawil THE 3 ONES Comprehensive Response to HIV Prevention, Treatment, Care and Support toward
UNICEF-EC Toolkit Background Paper on Social Budgeting UNICEF-EC Child Rights Toolkit Chapter on Social Budgeting Draft Radhika Radhika Gore Gore February 19, 2010 February 2010 1 Overview of the paper
Terms of Reference for the Mid-term Evaluation of the Implementation of UN-Habitat s Strategic Plan, 2014-2019 I. Introduction and Mandate 1. The Governing Council (GC) of the United Nations Human Settlement
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA COUNCIL OF MINISTERS MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND TREASURY STRATEGIC PLANNING AND MONITORING OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES Methodology, development and implementation of Public Investment Programme
UN-ATAF Workshop on Transfer Pricing Administrative Aspects and Recent Developments Ezulwini, Swaziland 4-8 December 2017 BACKGROUND NOTE Introduction The United Nations has transitioned from the Millennium
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK IN CENTRAL AMERICA Index Foreword 2 What is the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework? 4 The process in Nicaragua: The strategy for development and
GRB in Central, Southern and Western Serbia Women NGOs influence on local budgeting policies experience from Republic of Serbia Abstract: In this paper we will raise the issue of influence on state processes
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ARAB STATES Information note Revitalization of the Palestinian Fund for Employment and Social Protection Implementing Partners: Ministry of Labour,
SENEGAL NATIONAL CONSULTATION REPORT The Senegal National Consultation on the Istanbul Program of Action and the SDGs was held in Dakar on March 22, 2018. It was attended by representatives from the Ministry
AID FOR TRADE: CASE STORY COSTA RICA Date of submission: January 2011 Region: Latin America Country: Type: Author: Contact Details: Trade Opening as a Key Element of the Development Costa Rica Strategy/Trade
ECD Watch The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises a tool for responsible business conduct OECD Guidelines about the for Multinational enterprises The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.12.2017 COM(2017) 823 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK A EUROPEAN MINISTER
October 2016 C 2017/6 A E CONFERENCE Fortieth Session Rome, 3-8 July 2017 Audited Accounts - FAO 2015 This document can be accessed using the Quick Response Code on this page; an FAO initiative to minimize
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Procedures for financing the evaluation of initiatives funded by voluntary contributions FAO evaluation policy guidance November 2013 Food and Agriculture
Findings from The Survey on Promoting Planning and Implementation of SDGs in the Republic of Indonesia Prof. Dr. Yoko Ishida Center for the Study of International Cooperation in Education, Hiroshima University
READING 4.1: ADVOCACY SCENARIOS SCENARIO #1 Your education alliance has a reputation for its success in lobbying for changes in education policy and service delivery. Your strengths are alliance building
Barito Kuala, Indonesia Local progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (2013-2014) Name of focal point: Yusniar Nurdin Organization: BNPB Title/Position: Technical Support
Ministry of Economy Status of Sustainable Development Goals In Afghanistan November 2017 The SDGs at a glance The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are ambitious set of 17 goals, 169 targets and 232
August 26 2014 IMF POLICIES AND PRACTICES ON CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IMF staff regularly produces papers proposing new IMF policies, exploring options for reform, or reviewing existing IMF policies and operations.
Warsaw Stock Exchange Strategy 2014-2020 [ Summary ] Warsaw 16.01.2014 The following document has been prepared by WSE ( GPW ) and constitutes its intellectual property. Any coping or publishing thereof
CC is a development issue - not just an environmental concern CC impacts on human development, economic growth, poverty alleviation and the achievement of MDGs Long term: human lives and livelihoods are
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK SOCIAL BOND SECOND OPINION BY SUSTAINALYTICS September 26, 2017 www.sustainalytics.com Ankita Shukla (Toronto) Senior Advisor, Advisory Services firstname.lastname@example.org
Towards a Post-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction Introduction 1. The Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 (HFA) Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, is the inspiration
Summary Danube Transnational Programme 2014-2020 Summary of the Cooperation Programme Version 2.3, 20 th October 2014 Danube Transnational Programme 2014-2020 (INTERREG V-B DANUBE) Page 1 Mission of the
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) POLICY 1. PREAMBLE: The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility has gained prominence from all avenues. Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited (PGVCL) interfaces with
CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT BANK PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY April 2004 ABBREVIATIONS BMCs - Borrowing Member Countries CARICOM - Caribbean Community CDB - Caribbean Development Bank CSME - CARICOM Single
POLICY ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Chapter 1 1. CONCEPT 1.1 PREAMBLE 1.1.1. India has emerged as one of the largest economies in the world, and an increasingly important player in the global scenario,
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Strasbourg, 16 April 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0238 (COD) LEX 1514 PE-CONS 43/2/14 REV 2 DEVG 37 ACP 27 RELEX 145 CODEC 474 DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND
System of Health Accounts 2011 What is SHA 2011 and How Are SHA 2011 Data Produced and Used? Health resource tracking is the process of measuring health spending and the flow of financial resources among
Strengthening the Coherence of the Financing for Development and Effective Development Cooperation Agendas Key Messages from Asia-Pacific Regional Consultation 27 th March 2015 At a meeting hosted by NEDA,
November 23, 2015 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Charter Establishing The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Table of Contents Page Chapter I Definitions...2 Article 1 Definitions...2
UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/CONF.191/11 8 June 2001 Original: ENGLISH Third United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries Brussels, Belgium, 14-20 May 2001 PROGRAMME
Oxfam s Global Leaders Empowered to Alleviate Poverty (LEAP) Evaluation Highlights Key finding: From 2011 to 2014, LEAP enabled Oxfam to make significant contributions to policies in favor of poverty reduction
Binjai, Indonesia Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient (2013-2014) Name of focal point: Yusniar Nurdin Organization: BNPB Title/Position: Technical
AFGHANISTAN ALLOCATION GUIDELINES 22 JANUARY 2014 I. Contents Introduction... 2 Purpose... 2 Scope... 2 Rationale... 2 Acronyms... 2 I. Funding Mechanisms... 3 A. Eligibility... 3 B. Standard Allocation...
1 Page 2017 ECOSOC Forum on Financing for Development follow-up Outcome document Revised draft 1. We, ministers and high representatives, met in New York at United Nations Headquarters from 22 to 25 May
with GIZ for the Republic of Peru 29 January 2018 NDA Strengthening & Country Programming PAGE 1 OF 19 Ver. 30 November Readiness and Preparatory Support Proposal How to complete this document? - A readiness
Chad EIF Focal Point Mr Oumar Abderamane, Directeur du Commerce NSC Chair Mr Ousmane Mahamat Nour Elimi, Secretary General of the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) NIU Coordinator Mr Mahamat Touka Saleh,
Financial Inclusion and the G20 Agenda ISI Regional Statistics Conference Bali, 22-24 March 2017 Overview o G20 established in 1999. o Most important industrial and emerging economies (~86% of World GDP).
18 December 2012 AGE Platform Europe contribution to the Draft Report on an Adequate, Safe and Sustainable pensions (2012/2234(INI)) Rapporteur: Ria OOMEN-RUIJTEN AGE Platform Europe, a European network