Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal of 401(k) Stock-Drop Case
|
|
- Florence Dickerson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ERISA Litigation Advisory September 27, 2007 Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal of 401(k) Stock-Drop Case Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of a case against our client Avaya Inc., in which plaintiff alleged defendants breached their fiduciary duty by (1) imprudently offering employer stock as an investment option to 401(k) plan participants and (2) failing to disclose material information to those plan participants. Edgar v. Avaya, Inc., et al., F.3d, 2007 WL , Case No (3d Cir. Sept. 26, 2007). In the unanimous panel opinion authored by Judge Julio M. Fuentes, the court holds that a deferential abuse of discretion standard applies to a 401(k) plan fiduciary s decision to follow plan terms that require employer stock to be an investment option. Further, plaintiffs must plead facts that, if true, would show the defendants abused their discretion or the case should be dismissed. Edgar v. Avaya, Inc., et al. Facts In Edgar, plaintiff alleged defendant Avaya Inc. and certain of its officers breached the fiduciary duty of prudence imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( ERISA ) when they offered Avaya common stock as an investment option to participants in several different Avaya 401(k) savings plans. According to the plaintiff, the price of Avaya stock was artificially inflated by inaccurate earnings forecasts issued by Avaya in late 2004 and early Plaintiff contended that defendants were aware of the alleged inaccuracy in the earnings forecasts and corresponding inflation in the stock s price and breached their fiduciary duties by failing to sell the Avaya stock or remove it as an investment option. Plaintiff asserted that once Avaya s true financial condition was disclosed to the market the stock s price declined and the plans participants suffered a loss. Additionally, plaintiff alleged that defendants breached their fiduciary duty by failing to disclose to the plans participants the alleged materially adverse facts that led to the stock price s inflation prior to disclosing that information to the market in connection with its quarterly earnings release. The Duty of Prudence The court began its analysis by holding that the deferential standard of review first articulated in Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553 (3d Cir. 1995), applied to the Avaya defendants decision to offer Avaya stock as an investment option. Edgar, 2007 WL , *3-*4. This advisory is published by Alston & Bird LLP to provide a summary of significant developments to our clients and friends. It is intended to be informational and does not constitute legal advice regarding any specific situation. This material may also be considered attorney advertising under court rules of certain jurisdictions. 1
2 The plan in Moench was an employer stock ownership plan ( ESOP ) which required the plan trustee to invest all employee contributions in company stock. Edgar, 2007 WL , *3. After the price of the employer s stock declined dramatically, a former participant in the company-sponsored ESOP sued the plan s fiduciaries, claiming they should have diversified plan assets in light of the company s financial deterioration. Id. The Moench court determined that an intermediate abuse of discretion standard would apply to the Moench defendants decision to invest in employer stock. Id., *4. This standard, commonly known as the Moench presumption of prudence, states that an ESOP fiduciary who invests [plan] assets in employer stock is entitled to a presumption that it acted consistently with ERISA by virtue of that decision. However, the plaintiff may overcome that presumption by establishing that the fiduciary abused its discretion by investing in employer securities. Id. In cases subsequent to Moench, plaintiffs have argued with some success that the Moench presumption does not apply to non-esop plans. However, the Third Circuit squarely rejected that argument in Edgar: Edgar argues that Moench s presumption of prudence does not apply here, because the Plans at issue in this case are not ESOPs. We are not persuaded. An ESOP is one of several types of pension plans categorized under ERISA as Eligible Individual Account Plans or EIAPs.... It is undisputed that the Plans at issue in this case are EIAPs. Because one of the purposes of EIAPs is to promote investment in employer securities, they are subject to many of the same exceptions that apply to ESOPs. See Wright v. Oregon Metallurgical Corp., 360 F.3d 1090, 1094 (9th Cir. 2004).... Consequently, EIAPs, like ESOPs, place employee retirement assets at much greater risk than traditional ERISA plans. Wright, 360 F.3d at 1097 n.2. Given these similarities, we conclude that the underlying rationale of Moench applies equally here. In sum, we conclude that the District Court correctly determined that Moench s abuse of discretion standard governs judicial review of defendants decision to offer the Avaya Stock Fund as an investment option. Id., *5. Having determined that the Moench presumption applied, the Third Circuit next explained what was required to show an abuse of discretion. Relying on Moench, the court stated [i]n order to rebut the presumption that a fiduciary acted prudently in investing in employer securities, a plaintiff must show that the ERISA fiduciary could not have believed reasonably that continued adherence to the ESOP s direction was in keeping with the settlor s expectations of how a prudent trustee would operate. Id. Thus, a plaintiff must show that owing to circumstances not known to the settlor and not anticipated by him, investing in employer securities would defeat or substantially impair the accomplishment of the purposes of the trust. Id. The court found the plaintiff s allegations in Edgar insufficient to establish an abuse of discretion: Edgar s allegations, if true, indicate that during the Class Period, Avaya was undergoing corporate developments that were likely to have a negative effect on the company s earnings and, therefore, on the value of the company s stock. In fact, this is precisely what happened when the price of Avaya stock declined by $2.68 per share following Avaya s April 19, 2005, earnings announcement. We cannot agree, however, that these developments, or the corresponding drop in stock price, created the type of dire situation which would require 2
3 defendants to disobey the terms of the Plans by not offering the Avaya Stock Fund as an investment option, or by divesting the Plans of Avaya securities. Indeed, had defendants divested the Plans of Avaya common stock during the Class Period, they would have risked liability for having failed to follow the terms of the Plans. Id., *6. Finally, the court rejected plaintiff s argument that applying the Moench presumption at the motion to dismiss stage was inconsistent with the liberal pleading standards in Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. The court noted that [q]uite simply, if a plaintiff does not plead all of the essential elements of his or her legal claim, a district court is required to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Id. Accordingly, the court saw no reason to allow this case to proceed to discovery when, even if the allegations are proven true, Edgar cannot establish that defendants abused their discretion. Id. The Duty of Disclosure The Third Circuit also soundly rejected the plaintiff s argument that, even if defendants were not required to divest the plans of Avaya stock, they were required to disclose to the plans participants the alleged adverse facts relating to Avaya s financial prospects prior to any earnings announcement. Id., *7. In rejecting this argument, the court reasoned that: The Summary Plan Descriptions inform Plan participants that their investments are tied to the market performance of the 17 funds; that each fund carries different risks and potential returns; that participants are responsible for investigating the investment options; and that, in doing so, they might consider seeking the advice of a personal financial advisor. In addition, the Plan Descriptions explicitly warn participants that there are particular risks associated with investing in a non-diversified fund. Nowhere in the Plan Descriptions or the Plans themselves are participants guaranteed a particular return on their investments. These disclosures were sufficient to satisfy defendants obligation not to misinform participants about the risks associated with investment in the Avaya Stock Fund. Id., *7. The court further reasoned that [u]nder Third Circuit law, [defendants] did not have a duty to give investment advice or to opine on the stock s condition. Id. Additionally, the court specifically rejected plaintiff s argument that there was a duty to disclose the adverse developments under ERISA before the quarterly earnings announcement. The court reasoned that had defendants publicly released any adverse information they had prior to the April 2005 announcement, under the efficient capital markets hypothesis, such a disclosure would have resulted in a swift market adjustment... and the Plans would have sustained the same losses they incurred when the Company publicly announced the quarterly results.... Id. In addition, the court noted that defendants could have faced potential liability under the securities laws for insider trading if they had decided to divest the plans of company stock based on non-public information. Id. Thus, the court concluded that the failure to inform participants about the adverse corporate developments prior to the earnings announcement did not constitute a breach of their disclosure obligations under ERISA. Id. 3
4 Conclusion Edgar is an important development in the jurisprudence surrounding employee stock in 401(k) plans. It raises the bar for plaintiffs to survive motions to dismiss such cases, and it adds to the growing list of opinions that reject these claims. Sean K. McMahan, ERISA Litigation Alston & Bird LLP (404)
5 If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact your Alston & Bird attorney or any one of the following: Members of Alston & Bird s ERISA Litigation Group Teresa Thebaut Bonder teresa.bonder@alston.com John R. Hickman john.hickman@alston.com Nancy B. Pridgen nancy.pridgen@alston.com Philip C. Cook philip.cook@alston.com H. Douglas Hinson doug.hinson@alston.com Thomas G. Schendt thomas.schendt@alston.com Patrick C. DiCarlo pat.dicarlo@alston.com Forrest W. Hunter forrest.hunter@alston.com Peter M. Varney peter.varney@alston.com Ashley Gillihan ashley.gillihan@alston.com Sean K. McMahan sean.mcmahan@alston.com David R. Godofsky, F.S.A david.godofsky@alston.com Michael G. Monnolly mike.monnolly@alston.com ATLANTA One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA CHARLOTTE Bank of America Plaza 101 South Tryon Street Suite 4000 Charlotte, NC DALLAS 2200 Ross Avenue Suite 4650W Dallas, TX NEW YORK 90 Park Avenue New York, NY If you would like to receive future ERISA Litigation Advisories electronically, please forward your contact information including address to erisa.advisory@alston. com. Be sure to put subscribe in the subject line. RESEARCH TRIANGLE 3201 Beechleaf Court Suite 600 Raleigh, NC WASHINGTON, DC The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC Alston & Bird llp 2007
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY March 10, 2009 Children s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 The Children s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 became
More informationEmployee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY HHS Issues Interim Regulations on Early Retiree Health Insurance Program Plan Sponsors Must Be Ready to Act Quickly to Take Advantage of the Program
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-13-2008 Ward v. Avaya Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-3246 Follow this and additional
More informationSupreme Court Allows Individual Damages Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
ERISA Litigation Advisory February 20, 2008 Supreme Court Allows Individual Damages Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty In an opinion authored by Justice Stevens, the Supreme Court has ruled that a participant
More informationEmployee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY May 16, 2011 IRS Issues Guidance on Form W-2 Reporting for Health Coverage Costs The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires for
More informationStakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Stakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries Law360, New
More informationEmployee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation ADVISORY September 15, 2010 Health Care Reform Guidance Update: New Prescription Requirement for OTC Medicines and Drugs Will Impact Administration of FSAs, HRAs
More informationThe Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases
The Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases ALYSSA OHANIAN The Supreme Court recently held in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S. Ct. 2459 (2014), that employer stock ownership plan
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE ADVISORY
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ADVISORY January 27, 2006 Delaware Chancery Court Issues Decision Containing Important Lessons for Boards and Special Committees and Raising Significant Issues for Special Committees
More informationU.S. Supreme Court Considering Fiduciary Responsibility For 401(k) Plan Company Stock Funds and Other Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)
Fiduciary Responsibility For Funds and Other Employee Andrew Irving Area Senior Vice President and Area Counsel The Supreme Court of the United States is poised to enter the debate over the standards of
More informationCorporate Governance and Securities Litigation ADVISORY
Corporate Governance and Securities Litigation ADVISORY March 31, 2009 Delaware Supreme Court Reaffirms Director Protections in Change of Control Context On March 25, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court issued
More informationPLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY. In further support of their Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated
Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK Document 216 Filed 01/20/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION C.A. No. 09 MD 2017 This
More informationERISA Stock Drop Litigation Against Financial Institutions
ERISA Stock Drop Litigation Against Financial Institutions Sheila Finnegan, Mayer Brown LLP Reginald Goeke, Mayer Brown LLP Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices
More informationTrustees: Independent vs. Internal and Directed vs. Non-Directed Legal Aspects
Trustees: Independent vs. Internal and Directed vs. Non-Directed Legal Aspects The 19 th Annual Ohio Employee Ownership Conference Akron/Fairlawn Hilton Akron, Ohio Friday, April 15, 2005 Carl J. Grassi,
More informationFinancial Services & Products ADVISORY
Financial Services & Products ADVISORY August 15, 2011 SEC Adopts Large Trader Registration and Reporting Requirements On July 26, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC, or the Commission )
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court of the United States WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. (202) 789-0096 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS... 1 I. OTHER
More informationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY ERISA ENTERS THE SPOTLIGHT
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY ERISA ENTERS THE SPOTLIGHT JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN * SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP DECEMBER 9, 2004 Directors of public companies and their advisers have long understood
More informationFinancial Services and Products ADVISORY
Financial Services and Products ADVISORY Supervisory Capital Assessment Program Results And Their Meaning for Other Financial Institutions May 11, 2009 The results of the Supervisory Capital Assessment
More informationFinancial Services and Products ADVISORY
Financial Services and Products ADVISORY Small Business Jobs Act of 2010: New Capital for Small and Mid-Size Banks October 15, 2010 A new source of government-provided capital, the Small Business Lending
More informationAugust 14, Winston & Strawn LLP
The Supreme Court s Decision in Dudenhoeffer: If You Offer a Company Stock Fund Investment Option in Your 401(k) Plan or ESOP, You Will be Sued, Eventually August 14, 2014 Today s elunch Presenters Mike
More informationFinancial Services and Products ADVISORY
Financial Services and Products ADVISORY Non-Controlling Investments in Banking Organizations: Federal Reserve Eases Restrictions Prospective investors considering minority stakes of more than five percent
More informationRegulatory Update Retirement Plans
DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C. VOLUME 4, NO. 2 Regulatory Update Retirement Plans DOL Outlook for 2014 IN THIS ISSUE: DOL Outlook for 2014 Stock Drop Case Update District Court Decision Affirms Importance
More information401(k) Fee Litigation Update
October 6, 2008 401(k) Fee Litigation Update Courts Divide on Fiduciary Status of 401(k) Service Providers Introduction As the 401(k) fee lawsuits progress, the federal district courts continue to grapple
More informationThe Investment Lawyer
The Investment Lawyer Covering Legal and Regulatory Issues of Asset Management VOL. 24, NO. 6 JUNE 2017 Business Development Company Update: Excessive Fees Lawsuit Against Adviser Dismissed By Kenneth
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cv ODE
[PUBLISH] RAYMOND A. LANFEAR RANDALL W. CLARK, ANTONIO FIERROS, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-13002 D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cv-00197-ODE FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
More informationImportant Changes to REIT Tax Rules Enacted in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
REIT Tax Advisory August 1, 2008 Important Changes to REIT Tax Rules Enacted in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 On July 30, 2008, President Bush signed into law the Housing and Economic Recovery
More informationBENEFITS LAW BRIEFING:
BENEFITS LAW BRIEFING: Eliminating the Company Stock Fund From Your Public Company's 401(k) Plan Navigating the Securities and ERISA Fiduciary Issues May 21, 2015 Jan Jacobson Senior Counsel, Retirement
More informationNew Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) Reporting Requirements Set to Take Effect January 2011 for Many Personal Injury Defendants
Health Care ADVISORY September 24, 2010 New Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) Reporting Requirements Set to Take Effect January 2011 for Many Personal Injury Defendants Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid,
More informationState & Local Tax. Advisory. State Taxation of Nonresident Limited Partners May Be Unconstitutional. Lanzi and the Due Process Clause
State & Local Tax Advisory August 8, 2006 Insights Into Recent Regulatory, Judicial and Legislative Developments Atlanta Charlotte New York Research Triangle Washington, D.C. State Taxation of Nonresident
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 17-2397 John Meiners, on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated, and on behalf of the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan lllllllllllllllllllllplaintiff
More informationBoomers on the Brink, ERISA Litigation on the Rise: Practical Advice to Avoid Becoming a Defendant
Boomers on the Brink, ERISA Litigation on the Rise: Practical Advice to Avoid Becoming a Defendant What is on the Horizon: The Perfect Storm of ERISA Litigation Doug Hinson, Pat DiCarlo, David Godofsky,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-1199 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RAYMOND PFEIL, MICHAEL KAMMER, ANDREW GENOVA, RICHARD WILMOT, JR. AND DONALD SECEN (ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED), v.
More informationJanuary 2005 Bulletin Labor Department Issues Guidance on Fiduciary Responsibilities of Directed Trustees
January 2005 Bulletin 05-01 Labor Department Issues Guidance on Fiduciary Responsibilities of Directed Trustees If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered in this
More informationSecurities Law Advisory
August 11, 2004 Securities Law Advisory Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Implications of Form 8-K Amendments and a Recent SEC Enforcement Action The new Form 8-K requirements that become effective August
More informationBenefits Briefing: Company Stock as a Retirement Plan Investment. Friday, September 21, p.m. to 3 p.m. ET
Benefits Briefing: Company Stock as a Retirement Plan Investment Friday, September 21, 2018 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET Today s Speakers Moderator: Guest Speakers: Jan Jacobson Senior Counsel, Retirement Policy
More informationNOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 03-4459 KIMBERLY BRUUN; ASHLEY R. EMANIS, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated persons Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 11-1531 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STEPHEN GRAY, et al., Petitioners, v. CITIGROUP INC., et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. In the Supreme Court of the United States FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, et al., Petitioners, v. JOHN DUDENHOEFFER, et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationPhilip Dix v. Total Petrochemicals USA Inc Pension Plan
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-30-2013 Philip Dix v. Total Petrochemicals USA Inc Pension Plan Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
More informationMILTON PFEIFFER, Plaintiff, v. BJURMAN, BARRY & ASSOCIATES, and BJURMAN, BARRY MICRO CAP GROWTH FUND, Defendants. 03 Civ.
MILTON PFEIFFER, Plaintiff, v. BJURMAN, BARRY & ASSOCIATES, and BJURMAN, BARRY MICRO CAP GROWTH FUND, Defendants. 03 Civ. 9741 (DLC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2006
More informationBankruptcy Circuit Update Featuring cases from April 2013
Bankruptcy Circuit Update Featuring cases from April 2013 11 th Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the 11 th Circuit, Case Number 12-15604 (will not be published). Ruling: Dividends paid to a shareholder
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv RNS
Deborah Johnson, et al v. Catamaran Health Solutions, LL, et al Doc. 1109519501 Case: 16-11735 Date Filed: 05/02/2017 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH
More informationSeptember 30, 2003 Ruling on Defendants Motions to Dismiss
September 30, 2003 Ruling on Motions to Dismiss Members of Enron s Board of Directors Compensation Committee (who appointed members to the administrative committees) Count I Surviving Breach of Fiduciary
More informationHEALTH & WELFARE PLAN LUNCH GROUP
HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN LUNCH GROUP May 4, 2006 ALSTON & BIRD LLP One Atlantic Center 1201 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309-3424 (404) 881-7885 E-mail: jhickman@alston.com 2006 All Rights Reserved HSAs,
More informationERISA & LIFE INSURANCE NEWS
January 2015 ERISA & LIFE INSURANCE NEWS Covering ERISA and Life, Health and Disability Insurance Litigation INSIDE THIS ISSUE Denial of STD Claim Upheld, Based on Failure to Provide Objective Medical
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
NO. 12-751 In the Supreme Court of the United States FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, ET AL., v. Petitioners, JOHN DUDENHOEFFER, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION RICHARD BARNES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:13-cv-0068-DGK ) HUMANA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL
More informationThe Supreme Court Requires Deference to Plan Administrator s Interpretation of ERISA Plan Notwithstanding Administrator s Prior Invalid Interpretation
To read the decision in Conkright v. Frommert, please click here. The Supreme Court Requires Deference to Plan Administrator s Interpretation of ERISA Plan Notwithstanding Administrator s Prior Invalid
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Whitney Main, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 4:16-cv-00473-O
More informationSecurities Law and Tax Advisory
March 6, 2003 Securities Law and Tax Advisory SEC Review of Filings by Fortune 500 Highlights Important Changes to Consider in Preparing Annual Disclosure Filings On February 27, 2003, the SEC s Division
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-757 In the Supreme Court of the United States DOMICK NELSON, PETITIONER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH
More informationLegal Risks of ESOPS:
Legal Risks of ESOPS: Strategies To Avoid ERISA Violations and Liability November 1, 2007 Randall C. McGeorge White & Case New York, NY rmcgeorge@ny.whitecase.com Craig C. Martin Jenner & Block Chicago,
More informationDerivatives Treatment in Bankruptcy Proceedings Minimizing Risks When a Counterparty Becomes Insolvent
presents Derivatives Treatment in Bankruptcy Proceedings Minimizing Risks When a Counterparty Becomes Insolvent A Live 90-Minute Audio Conference with Interactive Q&A Today's panel features: Willa Cohen
More informationERISA: THOU SHALL NOT PAY EXCESSIVE FEES! By: José M. Jara, Esq.
ERISA: THOU SHALL NOT PAY EXCESSIVE FEES! By: José M. Jara, Esq. Partner Employment, ERISA, and Employee Benefits Practice Group Leader About 12 years ago in 2006, there was a wave of class action lawsuits
More informationStock Drop Litigation: Recent Developments and Emerging Trends
Stock Drop Litigation: Recent Developments and Emerging Trends Rayman Mathoda, Entrepreneur and Investor Reginald Goeke, Mayer Brown LLP John Nadolenco, Mayer Brown LLP Fabio Bertoni, Incisive Media Mayer
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 12 3067 LAWRENCE G. RUPPERT and THOMAS A. LARSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs Appellees, v. ALLIANT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 15-CV-837 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN THOMAS MAVROFF, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-CV-837 KOHN LAW FIRM S.C. and DAVID A. AMBROSH, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 4:16-cv-00325-CWD Document 50 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, vs. Plaintiff IDAHO HYPERBARICS, INC., as Plan
More informationLiability of Legal and Compliance Officers. Richard D. Marshall Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP New York
Liability of Legal and Compliance Officers Richard D. Marshall Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP New York +1.212.940.8765 richard.marshall@kattenlaw.com Liability of Legal and Compliance Officers This is a controversial
More informationRecent trends in ERISA litigation
RETIREMENT INSIGHTS SERIES A valuable resource for advisors looking to grow their retirement business. Recent trends in ERISA litigation At Groom Law Group, where he currently serves as the firm s Chairman,
More informationFiduciary Best Practices Helped NYU Win ERISA Class Action
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Fiduciary Best Practices Helped NYU Win ERISA
More informationPENSION & BENEFITS! C lass action lawsuits challenging fiduciaries purchase A BNA, INC. REPORTER
A BNA, INC. PENSION & BENEFITS! REPORTER Reproduced with permission from Pension & Benefits Reporter, 37 BPR 2106, 9/21/10, 09/21/2010. Copyright 2010 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
More informationRecent Plan Litigation and the Impact on Legislative, Regulatory and Plan Sponsor Activity
Benefits Briefing: Recent Plan Litigation and the Impact on Legislative, Regulatory and Plan Sponsor Activity Christopher J. Rillo Bradford P. Campbell Schiff Hardin LLP Christopher J. Rillo Partner 415.901.8631/202.778.6443/crillo@schiffhardin.com
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION: DO THE TWO COINCIDE IN THE POST- ENRON ENVIRONMENT? Dana M. Muir * and Cindy A.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION: DO THE TWO COINCIDE IN THE POST- ENRON ENVIRONMENT? I. Introduction by Dana M. Muir * and Cindy A. Schipani ** The corporate scandals of the past few years
More informationCase 1:17-cv GBD Document 29 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:17-cv-03070-GBD Document 29 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOAN PIRUNDINI, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC., No. 1:17-cv-03070-GBD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO: 8:15-cv-126-T-30EAJ ORDER
Case 8:15-cv-00126-JSM-EAJ Document 57 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID 526 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counterclaim
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA JOHN RANNIGAN, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) Case No. 1:08-CV-256 v. ) ) Chief Judge Curtis L. Collier LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE ) FOR
More informationFinancial Services and Products ADVISORY
Financial Services and Products ADVISORY February 9, 2009 Asset Managers Committee and Investors Committee Release Final Reports on Best Practices for Hedge Fund Industry The Asset Managers Committee (AMC)
More informationQ UPDATE EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS CASES OF INTEREST D&O FILINGS, SETTLEMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS Q1 2018 UPDATE CASES OF INTEREST U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDS STATE COURTS RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER 1933 ACT CLAIMS STATUTORY DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF TCPA FOUND TO BE PENALTIES AND
More informationCase3:09-cv MMC Document22 Filed09/08/09 Page1 of 8
Case:0-cv-0-MMC Document Filed0/0/0 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 United States District Court For the Northern District of California NICOLE GLAUS,
More informationAlert. Lower Courts Wrestle with Debtors Tuition Payments. December 12, 2018
Alert Lower Courts Wrestle with Debtors Tuition Payments December 12, 2018 Two courts have added to the murky case law addressing a bankruptcy trustee s ability to recover a debtor s tuition payments for
More informationThe United States Supreme Court held in Tibble et al. v. Edison
Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L Employee Benefits Electronically reprinted from Spring 2016 The Trouble Caused by Tibble: Supreme Court Case Requires Enhanced Monitoring of Plan Investments Mark
More informationNo , , Consolidated with Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-3912, 16-1203, 16-1408 Consolidated with Nos. 15-3909, 15-1245 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation LEIF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION ) THOMAS E. PEREZ, ) Civil Action No. Secretary of the United States ) Department of Labor, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
More informationLearning the True Meaning of Fiduciary, the Hard Way Sub: As 401(k) values plummet, pensioners look to employers and question their performances
Learning the True Meaning of Fiduciary, the Hard Way Sub: As 401(k) values plummet, pensioners look to employers and question their performances By Evan Miller and Alison Cera National Law Journal Although
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: ARNALDO VELEZ, an individual, TAYLOR, BRION, BUKER & GREENE, a general partnership, vs. Petitioners, BIRD LAKES DEVELOPMENT CORP., a Panamanian corporation, Respondent.
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-751 In the Supreme Court of the United States FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. JOHN DUDENHOEFFER, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re Tyco International. Ltd. Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 1335) MDL DOCKET NO. 02-1335-PB ERISA Action Case No. 02-1357-PB MEMORANDOM AND
More informationNarrowing the Scope of Auditor Duties
Narrowing the Scope of Auditor Duties David Margulies, J.D. Candidate 2010 The tort of deepening insolvency refers to an action asserted by a representative of a bankruptcy estate against directors, officers,
More informationAVOIDING FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. Brian T. Ortelere Charles C. Jackson
AVOIDING FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS I. INTRODUCTION Brian T. Ortelere Charles C. Jackson Recent highly publicized corporate reversals have spawned numerous class action lawsuits raising
More informationHolding Debt and Equity Investments in a Financially Distressed Company May Survive Recharacterization Claims
T O O U R F R I E N D S A N D C L I E N T S M e m o r a n d u m December 8, 2006 www.friedfrank.com Holding Debt and Equity Investments in a Financially Distressed Company May Survive Recharacterization
More informationCase 2:17-cv DAK Document 21 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH
Case 2:17-cv-00280-DAK Document 21 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH Kang Sik Park, M.D. v. Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER First American Title Insurance
More informationSEVENTH CIRCUIT ADOPTS NEW STANDARD FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MUTUAL FUND ADVISORY FEES
CLIENT MEMORANDUM SEVENTH CIRCUIT ADOPTS NEW STANDARD FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MUTUAL FUND ADVISORY FEES In a recent opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit adopted a new standard of judicial
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0223p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MEAD VEST, v. RESOLUTE FP US INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationRole Of Advisers In Client Class Action Claims
Investment Adviser Association Compliance Workshop October 26, 2005 Role Of Advisers In Client Class Action Claims Steven W. Stone Partner Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP www.morganlewis.com Role Of Advisers
More informationBAILEY CAVALIERI LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW
BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW One Columbus 10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100 Columbus, Ohio 43215-3422 telephone 614.221.3155 facsimile 614.221.0479 www.baileycavalieri.com ERISA TAGALONG LITIGATION
More informationPLAN DISTRIBUTION AND ROLLOVER GUIDANCE AFTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V. US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
PLAN DISTRIBUTION AND ROLLOVER GUIDANCE AFTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V. US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE DESERET LETTER September 2018 www.morganlewis.com This White Paper is provided for your convenience
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 17 2477 MARIO LOJA, Plaintiff Appellant, v. MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORPORATION, et al., Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Opinion filed August 1, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00263-CV RON POUNDS, Appellant V. LIBERTY LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 215th District
More informationCase 1:10-cv FB-VVP Document 36 Filed 09/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 590
Case 1:10-cv-01458-FB-VVP Document 36 Filed 09/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 590 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------- x DOMINICK
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CV-KLR.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-11336 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 07-80310-CV-KLR FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 11,
More informationReview of Employee Benefits Claims Before Glenn. Patrick W. Spangler
Dual-role Benefit Plan Administrator Conflicts: Proceed With Caution The Supreme Court s ruling in Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn increases the likelihood of the courts overturning certain benefits
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, * v. * * No LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF * NORTH AMERICA, et al.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. No. 11-20184 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees. MOTION OF THE SECRETARY
More informationESOP FIDUCIARY LIABILITY: AN OVERVIEW OF THE OBLIGATIONS AND EXPOSURES OF ESOP FIDUCIARIES. Prepared by Stephen D. Rosenberg, The Wagner Law Group 1
ESOP FIDUCIARY LIABILITY: AN OVERVIEW OF THE OBLIGATIONS AND EXPOSURES OF ESOP FIDUCIARIES Prepared by Stephen D. Rosenberg, The Wagner Law Group 1 Table of Contents Important Note... 1 Executive Summary...
More informationEmployee Relations. Lytle v. Lowe s Home Centers, Inc.: A Case Study in ERISA and Employee Classification Issues. Craig C. Martin and Amanda S.
Electronically reprinted from Autumn 2014 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L ERISA Litigation Lytle v. Lowe s Home Centers, Inc.: A Case Study in ERISA and Employee Classification Issues Craig C. Martin
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-2984 Domick Nelson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
More informationD. Brian Hufford. Partner
D. Brian Hufford Partner D. Brian Hufford leads a national practice representing patients and health care providers in disputes with health insurance companies. Brian developed innovative and successful
More informationFinancial Services and Products ADVISORY
Financial Services and Products ADVISORY June 30, 2011 Federal Reserve Board Issues Final Rule to Implement Durbin Amendment On June 29, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule to implement
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261
Case: 1:10-cv-00573 Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION VICTOR GULLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No (E.D. Pa.)
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No. 16-0497 (E.D. Pa.) Please read this notice carefully and completely. If you are a member of the Class, the
More information