Business Strategy in Oligopoly Markets
|
|
- Frederick Gaines
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 5 Business Strategy in Oligopoly Markets
2 Introduction In the majority of markets firms interact with few competitors In determining strategy each firm has to consider rival s reactions strategic interaction in prices, outputs, advertising This kind of interaction is analyzed using game theory assumes that players are rational Distinguish cooperative and noncooperative games focus on noncooperative games Also consider timing simultaneous versus sequential games
3 Oligopoly Theory No single theory employ game theoretic tools that are appropriate outcome depends upon information available Need a concept of equilibrium players (firms?) choose strategies, one for each player combination of strategies determines outcome outcome determines pay-offs (profits?) Equilibrium first formalized by Nash: No firm wants to change its current strategy given that no other firm changes its current strategy
4 Nash Equilibrium Equilibrium need not be nice firms might do better by coordinating but such coordination may not be possible (or legal) Some strategies can be eliminated on occasions they are never good strategies no matter what the rivals do These are dominated strategies they are never employed and so can be eliminated elimination of a dominated strategy may result in another being dominated: it also can be eliminated One strategy might always be chosen no matter what the rivals do: dominant strategy
5 An Example Two airlines Prices set: compete in departure times 70% of consumers prefer evening departure, 30% prefer morning departure If the airlines choose the same departure times they share the market equally Pay-offs to the airlines are determined by market shares Represent the pay-offs in a pay-off matrix
6 The example (cont.) The left-hand number is the pay-off to Delta What is the The Pay-Off Matrixequilibrium for this game? Morning American Evening Delta Morning Evening (15, 15) (30, 70) The right-hand number is the (70, 30) pay-off (35, 35) to American
7 If AmericanThe example If American (cont.) chooses a morning The morning departure departure, Delta The chooses Pay-Off an evening The morning departure Matrix is a dominated departure, Delta is also a dominated will choose strategy for Delta and will so still choose strategy for American and evening evening American can be eliminated. again be eliminated The Nash Equilibrium must therefore be one in which Morning Evening both airlines choose an evening departure Morning (15, 15) (30, 70) Delta Evening (70, 30) (35, 35)
8 The example (cont.) Now suppose that Delta has a frequent flier program When both airline choose the same departure times Delta gets 60% of the travelers This changes the pay-off matrix
9 The If Delta example (cont.) chooses The a Pay-Off morning Matrix departure, American However, a morning departure But if American Delta will has choose is nostill a dominated strategy for Delta chooses dominated an eveningstrategy (Evening is American still a dominant strategy. departure, American American knows this will and choose so chooses morning a morning Morning Evening departure Morning (18, 12) (30, 70) Delta Evening (70, 30) (42, 28)
10 Nash Equilibrium Again What if there are no dominated or dominant strategies? The Nash equilibrium concept can still help us in eliminating at least some outcomes Change the airline game to a pricing game: 60 potential passengers with a reservation price of $ additional passengers with a reservation price of $220 price discrimination is not possible (perhaps for regulatory reasons or because the airlines don t know the passenger types) costs are $200 per passenger no matter when the plane leaves the airlines must choose between a price of $500 and a price of $220 if equal prices are charged the passengers are evenly shared Otherwise the low-price airline gets all the passengers The pay-off matrix is now:
11 The example (cont.) If Delta prices high If both price highand The American Pay-Off low Matrix then both get 30then American gets passengers. If Delta prices Profit low all 180 passengers. American and per American passenger high is If both price low Profit per passenger then $300 Delta gets they each get 90 is $20 all 180 passengers. P H = $500 passengers. P L = $220 Profit per passenger Profit per passenger is $20 is $20 P H = $500 ($9000,$9000) ($0, $3600) Delta P L = $220 ($3600, $0) ($1800, $1800)
12 Nash Equilibrium There is no simple (cont.) way to choose between (PH, PH) is a Nash these equilibria. even so, the Nash concept equilibrium. Matrix (PHThe, PL)Pay-Off cannotbut be (PL, PL) is aequilibria Nash has eliminated half of the outcomes as If both are pricing a Nash equilibrium. equilibrium. and familiarity highcustom then neither wants If American prices American If both are pricing might lead both to to change low then Delta should low then neither wants (PL, PHprice ) cannot be high also price low a Nash equilibrium. to change PH = $500 PL = $220 If American prices There are two Nash high then Delta shouldequilibria to this version also pricephigh ($9000,$9000) ($0, $3600) ($9000, of the$9000) game H = $500 Regret might cause both to Delta price low ($3600, $0) ($1800, $1800) PL = $220
13 Nash Equilibrium (cont.) There is no simple (PH, PH) is a Nash way to choose between equilibrium. The Pay-Off Matrix, P ) cannot be There are two(p Nash H L (Pat a Nash L, P L) iswe these equilibria, but least have If both are pricing equilibria to thisa version Nash equilibrium. equilibrium. eliminated half of the outcomes as high thenofneither wants the game If American prices American If both are pricing possible equilibria to change low then Delta would (PL, PH) cannot be low then neither wants want to price low, too. a Nash equilibrium. to change PH = $500 PL = $220 If American prices high then Delta should also pricephigh ($9000,$9000) ($0, $3600) ($9000, $9000) H = $500 Delta PL = $220 ($3600, $0) ($1800, $1800)
14 The only sensible choice for Delta is PH knowingsometimes, that American consideration of thethat Delta Suppose The Pay-Off Matrix timing of moves can canhelp set its price first will follow with P and each will Delta can see that Hif it sets find the equilibrium This means that earn $9000. theusnash a high price, then So, American equilibria is (PH, PH) will do bestnow by also AmericanPH, PL cannot be pricing high. Delta an equilibrium earns $9000 This means PH = $500 PL = outcome $220 Delta can that alsopsee that L,PH if it sets a low price, American cannot be an will do$500 best by pricing$3,000) low. PH = ($9000,$9000) ($0, $3600) ($3,000, equilibrium Delta will then earn $1800 Delta PL = $220 ($3600, $0) ($1800, $1800)
15 Price Leadership Implicit Collusion Price Leader (Barometric Firm) Largest, dominant, or lowest cost firm in the industry Demand curve is defined as the market demand curve less supply by the followers Followers Take market price as given and behave as perfect competitors
16 Price Leadership
17 Oligopoly Models There are three dominant oligopoly models Cournot Bertrand Stackelberg They are distinguished by the decision variable that firms choose the timing of the underlying game But each embodies the Nash equilibrium concept
18 The Cournot Model Start with a duopoly Two firms making an identical product (Cournot supposed this was spring water) Demand for this product is P = A - BQ = A - B(q 1 + q 2 ) where q 1 is output of firm 1 and q 2 is output of firm 2 Marginal cost for each firm is constant at c per unit To get the demand curve for one of the firms we treat the output of the other firm as constant So for firm 2, demand is P = (A - Bq 1 ) - Bq 2
19 The Cournot model (cont.) P = (A - Bq 1 ) - Bq 2 $ The profit-maximizing choice of output by firm 2 depends upon the output of firm 1 Marginal revenue for firm 2 is Solve this for output A - Bq 1 A - Bq 1 MR 2 = (A - Bq 1 ) - 2Bq 2 MR 2 MR 2 = MC A - Bq 1-2Bq 2 = c q 2 c q* 2 q* 2 = (A - c)/2b - q 1 /2 If the output of firm 1 is increased the demand curve for firm 2 moves to the left Demand MC Quantity
20 q* 2 = (A - c)/2b - q 1 /2 The Cournot model (cont.) This is the best response function for firm 2 It gives firm 2 s profit-maximizing choice of output for any choice of output by firm 1 There is also a best response function for firm 1 By exactly the same argument it can be written: q* 1 = (A - c)/2b - q 2 /2 Cournot-Nash equilibrium requires that both firms be on their best response functions.
21 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium (A-c)/B (A-c)/2B q C 2 q 2 If firm 2 produces The best response The Cournot-Nash (A-c)/B then firm function for for firm 1 is equilibrium is at is 1 will choose to q* q* 1 = 1 (A-c)/2B -- q 2 /2 Point C at the intersection 2 /2 produce no output of If the firm best 2 produces response nothing functions then firm The best response 1 will produce the function for for firm 2 is is C monopoly output q* q* 2 2 = (A-c)/2B -- q 1 1 /2 /2 Firm (A-c)/2B 2 s best response function Firm 1 s best response function q C 1 (A-c)/2B (A-c)/B q 1
22 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium (A-c)/B (A-c)/2B (A-c)/3B q 2 Firm 1 s best response function C q* 1 = (A - c)/2b - q* 2 /2 q* 2 = (A - c)/2b - q* 1 /2 q* 2 = (A - c)/2b - (A - c)/4b + q* 2 /4 3q* 2 /4 = (A - c)/4b Firm 2 s best response function q* 2 = (A - c)/3b q* 1 = (A - c)/3b (A-c)/3B (A-c)/2B (A-c)/B q 1
23 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium (cont.) In equilibrium each firm produces q C = 1 qc 2 = (A - c)/3b Total output is, therefore, Q* = 2(A - c)/3b Recall that demand is P = A - BQ So the equilibrium price is P* = A - 2(A - c)/3 = (A + 2c)/3 Profit of firm 1 is (P* - c)q C = (A - 1 c)2 /9B Profit of firm 2 is the same A monopolist would produce Q M = (A - c)/2b Competition between the firms causes their total output to exceed the monopoly output. Price is therefore lower than the monopoly price But output is less than the competitive output (A - c)/b where price equals marginal cost and P exceeds MC
24 Numerical Example of Cournot Duopoly Demand: P = 100-2Q = 100-2(q 1 + q 2 ); A = 100; B = 2 Unit cost: c = 10 Equilibrium total output: Q = 2(A c)/3b = 30; Individual Firm output: q 1 = q 2 = 15 Equilibrium price is P* = (A + 2c)/3 = $40 Profit of firm 1 is (P* - c)q C 1 = (A - c)2 /9B = $450 Competition: Q* = (A c)/b = 45; P = c = $10 Monopoly: Q M = (A - c)/2b = 22.5; P = $55 Total output exceeds the monopoly output, but is less than the competitive output Price exceeds marginal cost but is less than the monopoly price
25 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium (cont.) What if there are more than two firms? Much the same approach. Say that there are N identical firms producing identical products Total output Q = q 1 + q 2 + This + q N denotes output Demand is P = A - BQ = A - B(q of every 1 + q 2 firm + other + q N ) than firm 1 Consider firm 1. It s demand curve can be written: P = A - B(q q N ) - Bq 1 Use a simplifying notation: Q -1 = q 2 + q q N So demand for firm 1 is P = (A - BQ -1 ) - Bq 1
26 The Cournot model (cont.) P = (A - BQ -1 ) - Bq 1 $ The profit-maximizing choice of output by firm 1 depends upon the output of the other firms Marginal revenue for firm 1 is Solve this for output A - BQ -1 A - BQ -1 MR 1 = (A - BQ -1 ) - 2Bq 1 MR 1 MR 1 = MC A - BQ -1-2Bq 1 = c q 1 c q* 1 q* 1 = (A - c)/2b - Q -1 /2 If the output of the other firms is increased the demand curve for firm 1 moves to the left Demand MC Quantity
27 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium (cont.) q* 1 = (A - c)/2b - Q -1 /2 How do we solve this Q* -1 = (N - 1)q* 1 As the The firms for q* number are 1? of identical. firms increases As the number output of q* 1 = (A - c)/2b - (N - 1)q* 1 So /2 in equilibrium they of each firms firm increases falls (1 + (N - 1)/2)q* will have identical 1 = (A - c)/2b aggregate output As outputs q* 1 (N + 1)/2 = (A - c)/2b As increases the the number number of of firms firms increases increases price profit q* 1 = (A - c)/(n + 1)B tends of to each marginal firm falls cost Q* = N(A - c)/(n + 1)B P* = A - BQ* = (A + Nc)/(N + 1) Profit of firm 1 is P* 1 = (P* - c)q* 1 = (A - c) 2 /(N + 1) 2 B
28 Cournot-Nash equilibrium (cont.) What if the firms do not have identical costs? Once again, much the same analysis can be used Assume that marginal costs of firm 1 are c 1 and of firm 2 are c 2. Solve this for output Demand is P = A - BQ = A A - B(q symmetric 1 + q 2 ) result q 1 We have marginal revenue holds for firm for 1 output as before of MR 1 = (A - Bq 2 ) - 2Bq firm 2 1 Equate to marginal cost: (A - Bq 2 ) - 2Bq 1 = c 1 q* 1 = (A - c 1 )/2B - q 2 /2 q* 2 = (A - c 2 )/2B - q 1 /2
29 (A-c 1 )/B (A-c 2 )/2B q 2 R 1 R 2 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium q* 1 = (A - c 1 )/2B - q* 2 /2 The equilibrium As the marginal output cost of firm of firm 2 q* 2 2 = (A - c 2 )/2B - q* 1 /2 increases falls its What and best of happens response q* 2 = to (A this - c 2 )/2B - (A - c 1 )/4B firm curve 1 equilibrium fallshifts to when + q* 2 /4 the costs right change? 3q* 2 /4 = (A - 2c 2 + c 1 )/4B q* 2 = (A - 2c 2 + c 1 )/3B C q* 1 = (A - 2c 1 + c 2 )/3B (A-c 1 )/2B (A-c 2 )/B q 1
30 Cournot-Nash Equilibrium (cont.) In equilibrium the firms produce q C 1 = (A - 2c 1 + c 2 )/3B; q C 2 = (A - 2c 2 + c 1 )/3B Total output is, therefore, Q* = (2A - c 1 - c 2 )/3B Recall that demand is P = A - BQ So price is P* = A - (2A - c 1 - c 2 )/3 = (A + c 1 +c 2 )/3 Profit of firm 1 is (P* - c 1 )q C 1 = (A - 2c 1 + c 2 )2 /9B Profit of firm 2 is (P* - c 2 )q C 2 = (A - 2c 2 + c 1 )2 /9B Equilibrium output is less than the competitive level Output is produced inefficiently: the low-cost firm should produce all the output
31 A Numerical Example with Different Costs Let demand be given by: P = 100 2Q; A = 100, B =2 Let c 1 = 5 and c 2 = 15 Total output is, Q* = (2A - c 1 - c 2 )/3B = ( )/6 = 30 q C = (A - 2c + c )/3B = ( )/6 = 17.5 q C = (A - 2c + c )/3B = ( )/3B = 12.5 Price is P* = (A + c 1 +c 2 )/3 = ( )/3 = 40 Profit of firm 1 is (A - 2c 1 + c 2 ) 2 /9B =( ) 2 /18 = $612.5 Profit of firm 2 is (A - 2c 2 + c 1 ) 2 /9B = $312.5 Producers would be better off and consumers no worse off if firm 2 s 12.5 units were instead produced by firm 1
32 Concentration and Profitability Assume that we have N firms with different marginal costs We can use the N-firm analysis with a simple change Recall that demand for firm 1 is P = (A - BQ -1 ) - Bq 1 But then demand for firm i is P = (A - BQ -i ) - Bq i Equate this to marginal cost But c i Q* -i + q* i = Q* A - BQ -i - 2Bq i = c i and A - BQ* = P* This can be reorganized to give the equilibrium condition: A - B(Q* -i + q* i ) - Bq* i - c i = 0 P* - Bq* i - c i = 0 P* - c i = Bq* i
33 Concentration and profitability (cont.) P* - c i = Bq* i The price-cost margin Divide by P* and multiply the right-hand for each side firm by is Q*/Q* P* - c i = BQ* determined by its own q* i market share and overall P* P* Q* market demand elasticity The verage price-cost margin But BQ*/P* = 1/η and q* i /Q* = s i so: P* - c i s = i P* η Extending this we have P* - c P* = H η is determined by industry concentration as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
34 Price Competition: Bertrand In the Cournot model price is set by some market clearing mechanism Firms seem relatively passive Check that with An alternative approach is to assume that this firms demand compete and in prices: this is the approach taken by Bertrand these costs the Leads to dramatically different results monopoly price is Take a simple example $30 and quantity is 40 units two firms producing an identical product (spring water?) firms choose the prices at which they sell their water each firm has constant marginal cost of $10 market demand is Q = 100-2P
35 Bertrand competition (cont.) We need the derived demand for each firm demand conditional upon the price charged by the other firm Take firm 2. Assume that firm 1 has set a price of $25 if firm 2 sets a price greater than $25 she will sell nothing if firm 2 sets a price less than $25 she gets the whole market if firm 2 sets a price of exactly $25 consumers are indifferent between the two firms the market is shared, presumably 50:50 So we have the derived demand for firm 2 q 2 = 0 if p 2 > p 1 = $25 q 2 = 100-2p 2 if p 2 < p 1 = $25 q 2 = 0.5(100-50) = 25 if p 2 = p 1 = $25
36 q 2 = 0 if p 2 > p 1 p 1 Bertrand competition (cont.) More generally: Suppose firm 1 sets price p 1 Demand to firm 2 is: p 2 Demand is not continuous. There is a jump at p 2 = p 1 q 2 = 100-2p 2 if p 2 < p 1 q 2 = 50 - p 1 if p 2 = p 1 The discontinuity in demand carries over to profit 100-2p q p 1
37 Firm 2 s profit is: Bertrand competition (cont.) π 2 (p 1,, p 2 ) = 0 if p 2 > p 1 π 2 (p 1,, p 2 ) = (p 2-10)(100-2p 2 ) if p 2 < p 1 π 2 (p 1,, p 2 ) = (p 2-10)(50 - p 2 ) if p 2 = p 1 Clearly this depends on p 1. Suppose first that firm 1 sets a very high price: greater than the monopoly price of $30 For whatever reason!
38 What price Bertrand competition At should p So, if p (cont.) 1 falls to $30, 2 = p firm 1 = 2 $30, firm If With p 1 > $30, Firm 2 s profit looks set? p firm 2 should just like 1 = 2 $30, then gets this: undercut p 1 a bit and firm half 2 will of only earn a Firm 2 s Profit What if firm 1positive the get almost all the The profit monopoly by cutting its prices at $30? monopoly price monopoly profit price to $30 of $30 or less profit p 2 < p 1 p 2 = p 1 p 2 > p 1 $10 $30 p 1 Firm 2 s Price
39 Bertrand competition (cont.) Now suppose that firm 1 sets a price less than $30 Firm 2 s profit looks like this: As long as p 1 > c = $10, Firm Of 2 s course, Profit firm Firm What 2 should price aim 1 will then should just to undercut firm 2 undercut firm 2 set firm now? 1 p 2 < p Then firm 2 and should so on also price 1 at $10. Cutting price below cost gains What the whole if firm market 1 but loses money prices on at $10? every customer p 2 = p 1 p 2 > p 1 $10 p 1 $30 Firm 2 s Price
40 Bertrand competition (cont.) We now have Firm 2 s best response to any price set by firm 1: p* 2 = $30 if p 1 > $30 p* 2 = p 1 - something small if $10 < p 1 < $30 p* 2 = $10 if p 1 < $10 We have a symmetric best response for firm 1 p* 1 = $30 if p 2 > $30 p* 1 = p 2 - something small if $10 < p 2 < $30 p* 1 = $10 if p 2 < $10
41 Bertrand competition (cont.) The best response These best response function functions for look like this The best response firm 1 function for p 2 firm 2 R 1 $30 $10 R 2 The equilibrium The Bertrand is equilibrium with both has firms both pricing firms charging at marginal $10 cost $10 $30 p 1
42 Bertrand Equilibrium: modifications The Bertrand model makes clear that competition in prices is very different from competition in quantities Since many firms seem to set prices (and not quantities) this is a challenge to the Cournot approach But the Bertrand model has problems too for the p = marginal-cost equilibrium to arise, both firms need enough capacity to fill all demand at price = MC but when both firms set p = c they each get only half the market So, at the p = mc equilibrium, there is huge excess capacity This calls attention to the choice of capacity Note: choosing capacity is a lot like choosing output which brings us back to the Cournot model The intensity of price competition when products are identical that the Bertrand model reveals also gives a motivation for Product differentiation
43 An Example of Product Differentiation Coke and Pepsi are nearly identical but not quite. As a result, the lowest priced product does not win the entire market. Q C = P C P P MC C = $4.96 Q P = P P P C MC P = $3.96 There are at least two methods for solving this for P C and P P
44 Bertrand and Product Differentiation Method 1: Calculus Profit of Coke: π C = (P C )( P C P P ) Profit of Pepsi: π P = (P P )( P P P C ) Differentiate with respect to P C and P P respectively Method 2: MR = MC Reorganize the demand functions P C = ( P P ) Q C P P = ( P C ) Q P Calculate marginal revenue, equate to marginal cost, solve for Q C and Q P and substitute in the demand functions
45 Bertrand competition and product differentiation Both methods give the best response functions: P C = P P P P The Bertrand Note equilibrium that these is P P = P C are at upward their intersection sloping These can be solved for the equilibrium $8.11 prices as indicated $6.49 B R C R P $10.44 $12.72 P C
46 Bertrand Competition and the Spatial Model An alternative approach is to use the spatial model from Chapter 4 a Main Street over which consumers are distributed supplied by two shops located at opposite ends of the street but now the shops are competitors each consumer buys exactly one unit of the good provided that its full price is less than V a consumer buys from the shop offering the lower full price consumers incur transport costs of t per unit distance in travelling to a shop What prices will the two shops charge?
47 Bertrand and thewhat spatial model if shop Xm marks the Assume that shop 1 sets 1 raises price? location ofprice the p1 and shopits 2 sets Price Price marginal buyer price p 2 one who is indifferent between p 1buying either firm s p2 good p1 x m Shop 1 xm All consumers to the Shop 2 xm moves to the left of xm buy left: fromsome consumers And all consumers shop 1 switch to shop to 2the right buy from shop 2
48 Bertrand and the spatial model p 1 + tx m = p 2 + t(1 - x m ) 2tx m = p 2 - p 1 + t x m (p 1, p 2 ) = (p 2 - p 1 + t)/2t There are n consumers in total This is the fraction of consumers who buy from firm 1 How is x m determined? So demand to firm 1 is D 1 = N(p 2 - p 1 + t)/2t Price Price p 1 p 2 x m Shop 1 Shop 2
49 Bertrand equilibrium Profit to firm 1 is π 1 = (p 1 - c)d 1 = N(p 1 - c)(p 2 - p 1 + t)/2t 2 π 1 = N(p 2 p 1 - p 1 + tp 1 + cp 1 - cp 2 -ct)/2t Differentiate with respect This to is p the best response 1 function N π 1 / p 1 = (p 2t 2-2p for 1 + firm t + c) 1 = 0 Solve this for p 1 p* 1 = (p 2 + t + c)/2 This is the best response What about firm 2? By symmetry, function for it has firm a 2 similar best response function. p* 2 = (p 1 + t + c)/2
50 Bertrand and Demand p* 1 = (p 2 + t + c)/2 p* 2 = (p 1 + t + c)/2 p 2 R 1 2p* 2 = p 1 + t + c = p 2 /2 + 3(t + c)/2 c + t p* 2 = t + c p* 1 = t + c (c + t)/2 R 2 (c + t)/2 c + t p 1
51 Stackelberg Interpret in terms of Cournot Firms choose outputs sequentially leader sets output first, and visibly follower then sets output The firm moving first has a leadership advantage can anticipate the follower s actions can therefore manipulate the follower For this to work the leader must be able to commit to its choice of output Strategic commitment has value
52 Stackelberg Equilibrium: an example Assume that there are two firms Both with firms identical have constant products As in our earlier Cournot example, marginal let demand costs of be: $10, i.e., c = 10 for both firms P = 100-2Q = 100-2(q 1 + q 2 ) Total cost for for each firm is: C(q 1 ) = 10q 1 ; C(q 2 ) = 10q 2 Firm 1 is the market leader and chooses q 1 In doing so it can anticipate firm 2 s actions So consider firm 2. Demand is: P = (100-2q 1 ) - 2q 2 Marginal revenue therefore is: MR 2 = (100-2q 1 ) - 4q 2
53 Equate This ismarginal firm 2 s revenue Stackelberg equilibrium (cont.) Solve this equation with marginal cost best response for output function MR2 = (100-2q1) - 4q2 But firm q12knows q2 what q2 is going MR = (100-2q1) - 4q2 = 10 = c Firm Firm11knows knowsthat that to be this how firm 22 q*2 = q1/2 thisisis22) how firm From earlier example (slide we know will react totofirm firm 1 s react firm 1 s So 1 can Demand for firm 1 is:that 22.5 is the monopolywill output. This iscan an So firm 1 output choice output choice anticipate firm anticipate firm2 s 2 s P = (100-2q2) - 2q1 important result. The Stackelberg leader 22.5 reaction reactionwould. the same output as a monopolist P = (100-2q*2) -chooses 2q1 But 2 is not excluded P = (100 - (45 - q1)) -marginal 2q1 firm revenue Equate S from the market P = 55 - q1 with cost Solvemarginal this equation R Marginal revenue for firm 1 is: for output q1 MR1 = 55-2q1 55-2q1 = 10 q*1 = 22.5 q*2 = q1
54 Stackelberg equilibrium (cont.) Aggregate output is So the equilibrium price is $32.50 Firm 1 s profit is ( )22.5 π 1 = $ Firm 2 s profit is ( )11.25 π 2 = $ We know (see slide 22) that the 15 Cournot equilibrium is: q C = 1 qc = 15 2 The Cournot price is $40 Profit to each firm is $450 q 2 R 1 Leadership benefits Firm the leader 1 s best firm response 1 but Leadership function is like benefits harms the follower consumers 2 s but firm 2 reduces the aggregate the Cournot profits equilibrium C S Compare this this with with equilibrium R q 1
55 Stackelberg and Commitment It is crucial that the leader can commit to its output choice without such commitment firm 2 should ignore any stated intent by firm 1 to produce 45 units the only equilibrium would be the Cournot equilibrium So how to commit? prior reputation investment in additional capacity place the stated output on the market Finally, the timing of decisions matters
Static Games and Cournot. Competition
Static Games and Cournot Competition Lecture 3: Static Games and Cournot Competition 1 Introduction In the majority of markets firms interact with few competitors oligopoly market Each firm has to consider
More informationStatic Games and Cournot. Competition
Static Games and Cournot Introduction In the majority of markets firms interact with few competitors oligopoly market Each firm has to consider rival s actions strategic interaction in prices, outputs,
More informationECON/MGMT 115. Industrial Organization
ECON/MGMT 115 Industrial Organization 1. Cournot Model, reprised 2. Bertrand Model of Oligopoly 3. Cournot & Bertrand First Hour Reviewing the Cournot Duopoloy Equilibria Cournot vs. competitive markets
More informationExercises Solutions: Oligopoly
Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly Exercise - Quantity competition 1 Take firm 1 s perspective Total revenue is R(q 1 = (4 q 1 q q 1 and, hence, marginal revenue is MR 1 (q 1 = 4 q 1 q Marginal cost is MC
More informationWhen one firm considers changing its price or output level, it must make assumptions about the reactions of its rivals.
Chapter 3 Oligopoly Oligopoly is an industry where there are relatively few sellers. The product may be standardized (steel) or differentiated (automobiles). The firms have a high degree of interdependence.
More informationLecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models
Lecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models Managerial Economics November 16, 2012 Prof. Dr. Sebastian Rausch Centre for Energy Policy and Economics Department of Management, Technology and Economics ETH Zürich
More informationAS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July time : 1 hour. Do all 4 questions. All count equally.
AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July 2017 time : 1 hour Do all 4 questions. All count equally. Q1. Monopoly is inefficient because the monopoly s owner makes high profits, and the monopoly s
More informationECO410H: Practice Questions 2 SOLUTIONS
ECO410H: Practice Questions SOLUTIONS 1. (a) The unique Nash equilibrium strategy profile is s = (M, M). (b) The unique Nash equilibrium strategy profile is s = (R4, C3). (c) The two Nash equilibria are
More informationEC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis
EC 202 Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I George Symeonidis Oligopoly When only a small number of firms compete in the same market, each firm has some market power. Moreover, their interactions cannot be ignored.
More informationOligopoly (contd.) Chapter 27
Oligopoly (contd.) Chapter 7 February 11, 010 Oligopoly Considerations: Do firms compete on price or quantity? Do firms act sequentially (leader/followers) or simultaneously (equilibrium) Stackelberg models:
More informationDUOPOLY. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. July 2017 Frank Cowell: Duopoly. Almost essential Monopoly
Prerequisites Almost essential Monopoly Useful, but optional Game Theory: Strategy and Equilibrium DUOPOLY MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell 1 Overview Duopoly Background How the basic
More informationA monopoly is an industry consisting a single. A duopoly is an industry consisting of two. An oligopoly is an industry consisting of a few
27 Oligopoly Oligopoly A monopoly is an industry consisting a single firm. A duopoly is an industry consisting of two firms. An oligopoly is an industry consisting of a few firms. Particularly, l each
More informationMKTG 555: Marketing Models
MKTG 555: Marketing Models A Brief Introduction to Game Theory for Marketing February 14-21, 2017 1 Basic Definitions Game: A situation or context in which players (e.g., consumers, firms) make strategic
More informationThese notes essentially correspond to chapter 13 of the text.
These notes essentially correspond to chapter 13 of the text. 1 Oligopoly The key feature of the oligopoly (and to some extent, the monopolistically competitive market) market structure is that one rm
More informationGS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2005
GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment November 005 Q1. What are the market price, and aggregate quantity sold, in long run equilibrium in a perfectly competitive market for which the demand function has the
More informationNoncooperative Oligopoly
Noncooperative Oligopoly Oligopoly: interaction among small number of firms Conflict of interest: Each firm maximizes its own profits, but... Firm j s actions affect firm i s profits Example: price war
More informationEcon 323 Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 10, Question 1
Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory Practice Exam 2 with Solutions Chapter 10, Question 1 Which of the following is not a condition for perfect competition? Firms a. take prices as given b. sell a standardized
More informationProblem 3,a. ds 1 (s 2 ) ds 2 < 0. = (1+t)
Problem Set 3. Pay-off functions are given for the following continuous games, where the players simultaneously choose strategies s and s. Find the players best-response functions and graph them. Find
More informationIntroduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)
Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4) Outline: Modeling by means of games Normal form games Dominant strategies; dominated strategies,
More informationMICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U8213 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 2001
MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U813 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 001 Imperfect Competition Wednesday, March 1 st Reading: Pindyck/Rubinfeld Chapter 1 Strategic Interaction figure
More informationEcon 323 Microeconomic Theory. Practice Exam 2 with Solutions
Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory Practice Exam 2 with Solutions Chapter 10, Question 1 Which of the following is not a condition for perfect competition? Firms a. take prices as given b. sell a standardized
More informationLECTURE NOTES ON GAME THEORY. Player 2 Cooperate Defect Cooperate (10,10) (-1,11) Defect (11,-1) (0,0)
LECTURE NOTES ON GAME THEORY September 11, 01 Introduction: So far we have considered models of perfect competition and monopoly which are the two polar extreme cases of market outcome. In models of monopoly,
More informationPRISONER S DILEMMA. Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions
ECO 300 Fall 2005 November 22 OLIGOPOLY PART 2 PRISONER S DILEMMA Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, 481-2 Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions X = 12 2 P + P, X = 12 2 P + P 1 1 2 2 2 1
More informationEcon 302 Assignment 3 Solution. a 2bQ c = 0, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated price is. P (Q) = a b
Econ 302 Assignment 3 Solution. (a) The monopolist solves: The first order condition is max Π(Q) = Q(a bq) cq. Q a Q c = 0, or equivalently, Q = a c, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated
More informationElements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition
Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition Kai Hao Yang /2/207 In this lecture, we will apply the concepts in game theory to study oligopoly. In short, unlike
More informationGame Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati.
Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. Module No. # 06 Illustrations of Extensive Games and Nash Equilibrium
More informationEcon 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.
Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final
More informationChapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers
Chapter : Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers Learning Objectives Students should learn to:. Extend the reaction function ideas developed in the Cournot duopoly model to a model of sequential behavior
More informationDUOPOLY MODELS. Dr. Sumon Bhaumik (http://www.sumonbhaumik.net) December 29, 2008
DUOPOLY MODELS Dr. Sumon Bhaumik (http://www.sumonbhaumik.net) December 29, 2008 Contents 1. Collusion in Duopoly 2. Cournot Competition 3. Cournot Competition when One Firm is Subsidized 4. Stackelberg
More informationOligopoly Games and Voting Games. Cournot s Model of Quantity Competition:
Oligopoly Games and Voting Games Cournot s Model of Quantity Competition: Supposetherearetwofirms, producing an identical good. (In his 1838 book, Cournot thought of firms filling bottles with mineral
More informationIMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY
IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY Once there is imperfect competition in trade models, what happens if trade policies are introduced? A literature has grown up around this, often described as strategic
More informationMICROECONOMICS II. Author: Gergely K hegyi. Supervised by Gergely K hegyi. February 2011
MICROECONOMICS II. Sponsored by a Grant TÁMOP-4.1.2-08/2/A/KMR-2009-0041 Course Material Developed by Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest (ELTE) Department
More informationGame Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati
Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module No. # 03 Illustrations of Nash Equilibrium Lecture No. # 04
More informationCUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9
CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO May 22, 2015 Announcements HW #3 is due next week. Ch. 6.1: Ultimatum Game This is a simple game that can model a very simplified
More informationMicroeconomics I - Seminar #9, April 17, Suggested Solution
Microeconomics I - Seminar #9, April 17, 009 - Suggested Solution Problem 1: (Bertrand competition). Total cost function of two firms selling computers is T C 1 = T C = 15q. If these two firms compete
More informationLecture Note 3. Oligopoly
Lecture Note 3. Oligopoly 1. Competition by Quantity? Or by Price? By what do firms compete with each other? Competition by price seems more reasonable. However, the Bertrand model (by price) does not
More informationEconS Oligopoly - Part 3
EconS 305 - Oligopoly - Part 3 Eric Dunaway Washington State University eric.dunaway@wsu.edu December 1, 2015 Eric Dunaway (WSU) EconS 305 - Lecture 33 December 1, 2015 1 / 49 Introduction Yesterday, we
More informationChapter 10: Price Competition Learning Objectives Suggested Lecture Outline: Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Suggestions for the Instructor:
Chapter 0: Price Competition Learning Objectives Students should learn to:. Understand the logic behind the ertrand model of price competition, the idea of discontinuous reaction functions, how to solve
More informationExercise Chapter 10
Exercise 10.8.1 Where the isoprofit curves touch the gradients of the profits of Alice and Bob point in the opposite directions. Thus, increasing one agent s profit will necessarily decrease the other
More informationI. Introduction and definitions
Economics 335 March 7, 1999 Notes 7: Noncooperative Oligopoly Models I. Introduction and definitions A. Definition A noncooperative oligopoly is a market where a small number of firms act independently,
More informationThe Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers
Econ 5001 Spring 2018 Prof. James Peck The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers Note: There were 4 versions of the test: A, B, C, and D, based on player 1 s
More informationGame Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati
Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module No. # 03 Illustrations of Nash Equilibrium Lecture No. # 02
More informationHorizontal Mergers. Chapter 11: Horizontal Mergers 1
Horizontal Mergers Chapter 11: Horizontal Mergers 1 Introduction Merger mania of 1990s disappeared after 9/11/2001 But now appears to be returning Oracle/PeopleSoft AT&T/Cingular Bank of America/Fleet
More informationNoncooperative Market Games in Normal Form
Chapter 6 Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form 1 Market game: one seller and one buyer 2 players, a buyer and a seller Buyer receives red card Ace=11, King = Queen = Jack = 10, 9,, 2 Number represents
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Theory EC104
Advanced Microeconomic Theory EC104 Problem Set 1 1. Each of n farmers can costlessly produce as much wheat as she chooses. Suppose that the kth farmer produces W k, so that the total amount of what produced
More informationEcon 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.
Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final
More informationHW Consider the following game:
HW 1 1. Consider the following game: 2. HW 2 Suppose a parent and child play the following game, first analyzed by Becker (1974). First child takes the action, A 0, that produces income for the child,
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2012
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 01A) Fall 01 Oligopolistic markets (PR 1.-1.5) Lectures 11-1 Sep., 01 Oligopoly (preface to game theory) Another form
More informationGame Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium
Game Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium Below are two different games. The first game has a dominant strategy equilibrium. The second game has two Nash
More informationpq A q A = (6.01q A.01q C )q A q A = 6q A.01q 2 A.01q C q A q A.
In this chapter you will solve problems for firm and industry outcomes when the firms engage in Cournot competition, Stackelberg competition, and other sorts of oligopoly behavior In Cournot competition,
More informationChapter 9. Noncompetitive Markets and Inefficiency. Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Chapter 9 Noncompetitive Markets and Inefficiency FIGURE 9.BP.1 Market Structures and Their Characteristics 9-2 Monopoly Monopoly Characteristics: 1 firm, no close substitutes, so the firm can set Price.
More informationMicroeconomics III. Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 2012) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya
Microeconomics III Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 01) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya Oligopoly is a market in which only a few firms compete with one another,
More informationCUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4
CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO March 22, 2015 Homework #1 Homework #1 will be due at the end of class today. Please check the website later today for the solutions
More informationStrategy -1- Strategy
Strategy -- Strategy A Duopoly, Cournot equilibrium 2 B Mixed strategies: Rock, Scissors, Paper, Nash equilibrium 5 C Games with private information 8 D Additional exercises 24 25 pages Strategy -2- A
More informationAnswer Key. q C. Firm i s profit-maximization problem (PMP) is given by. }{{} i + γ(a q i q j c)q Firm j s profit
Homework #5 - Econ 57 (Due on /30) Answer Key. Consider a Cournot duopoly with linear inverse demand curve p(q) = a q, where q denotes aggregate output. Both firms have a common constant marginal cost
More informationEconomics 171: Final Exam
Question 1: Basic Concepts (20 points) Economics 171: Final Exam 1. Is it true that every strategy is either strictly dominated or is a dominant strategy? Explain. (5) No, some strategies are neither dominated
More informationMath 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing
Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing May 22, 2017 May 22, 2017 1 / 19 Bertrand Duopoly: Undifferentiated Products Game (Bertrand) Firm and Firm produce identical products. Each firm simultaneously
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory
Introduction to Game Theory Part 2. Dynamic games of complete information Chapter 1. Dynamic games of complete and perfect information Ciclo Profissional 2 o Semestre / 2011 Graduação em Ciências Econômicas
More informationCUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4
CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO March 27, 2015 Homework #1 Homework #1 will be due at the end of class today. Please check the website later today for the solutions
More informationG5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017
G5212: Game Theory Mark Dean Spring 2017 Modelling Dynamics Up until now, our games have lacked any sort of dynamic aspect We have assumed that all players make decisions at the same time Or at least no
More informationSolution Problem Set 2
ECON 282, Intro Game Theory, (Fall 2008) Christoph Luelfesmann, SFU Solution Problem Set 2 Due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, Oct. 7. Please let me know if you have problems to understand one of
More informationp =9 (x1 + x2). c1 =3(1 z),
ECO 305 Fall 003 Precept Week 9 Question Strategic Commitment in Oligopoly In quantity-setting duopoly, a firm will make more profit if it can seize the first move (become a Stackelberg leader) than in
More informationHE+ Economics Nash Equilibrium
HE+ Economics Nash Equilibrium Nash equilibrium Nash equilibrium is a fundamental concept in game theory, the study of interdependent decision making (i.e. making decisions where your decision affects
More informationEcon 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to.
Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to. 1 Econ 101A Final Exam Th 15 December. Please solve Problem 1, 2, and 3 in the first blue book and Problems 4 and 5 in the
More informationAnswers to Odd-Numbered Problems, 4th Edition of Games and Information, Rasmusen. PROBLEMS FOR CHAPTER 14: Pricing
ODD Answers to Odd-Numbered Problems, 4th Edition of Games and Information, Rasmusen PROBLEMS FOR CHAPTER 14: Pricing 14 November 2005. Erasmuse@indiana.edu. Http://www.rasmusen.org. This appendix contains
More informationGS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 3 November 2012
GS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 3 November 01 Q1. What is the profit function, and the long run supply function, f a perfectly competitive firm with a production function f(x 1, x ) = ln x
More informationMicroeconomics, IB and IBP. Regular EXAM, December 2011 Open book, 4 hours
Microeconomics, IB and IBP Regular EXAM, December 2011 Open book, 4 hours There are two pages in this exam. In total, there are six questions in the exam. The questions are organized into four sections.
More informationMarch 30, Why do economists (and increasingly, engineers and computer scientists) study auctions?
March 3, 215 Steven A. Matthews, A Technical Primer on Auction Theory I: Independent Private Values, Northwestern University CMSEMS Discussion Paper No. 196, May, 1995. This paper is posted on the course
More informationSOLVING COURNOT, STACKELBERG AND COLLUSION GAMES USING R
SOLVING COURNOT, STACKELBERG AND COLLUSION GAMES USING R GIACOMO FRANCHINI AND MATTEO BONFANTI 1. Introduction The issue we would like to cover in this brief guide is how to run Cournot, Stackelberg Games
More informationCUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015
CUR 41: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 015 Instructions: Please write your name in English. This exam is closed-book. Total time: 10 minutes. There are 4 questions,
More informationExercises Solutions: Game Theory
Exercises Solutions: Game Theory Exercise. (U, R).. (U, L) and (D, R). 3. (D, R). 4. (U, L) and (D, R). 5. First, eliminate R as it is strictly dominated by M for player. Second, eliminate M as it is strictly
More informationEconomics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna
Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna November 11, 2009 Outline 1. Oligopoly: Cournot 2. Oligopoly: Bertrand 3. Second-price Auction 4. Auctions: ebay Evidence 1 Oligopoly: Cournot Nicholson,
More informationOn Forchheimer s Model of Dominant Firm Price Leadership
On Forchheimer s Model of Dominant Firm Price Leadership Attila Tasnádi Department of Mathematics, Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration, H-1093 Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Hungary
More informationIn the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics
In the Name of God Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Microeconomics (for MBA students) 44111 (1393-94 1 st term) - Group 2 Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi Game Theory Game:
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016 More on strategic games and extensive games with perfect information Block 2 Jun 11, 2017 Auctions results Histogram of
More informationAnswers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)
Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, 2016 1. In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average) cost. To investigate the consequences of markup pricing,
More informationMicroeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 2017
Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 07. (40 points) Consider a Cournot duopoly. The market price is given by q q, where q and q are the quantities of output produced
More informationMA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE
MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE Problem Set 1 These questions will go over basic game-theoretic concepts and some applications. homework is due during class on week 4. This [1] In this problem (see Fudenberg-Tirole
More informationEconomics 335 Problem Set 6 Spring 1998
Economics 335 Problem Set 6 Spring 1998 February 17, 1999 1. Consider a monopolist with the following cost and demand functions: q ö D(p) ö 120 p C(q) ö 900 ø 0.5q 2 a. What is the marginal cost function?
More informationAS/ECON AF Answers to Assignment 1 October Q1. Find the equation of the production possibility curve in the following 2 good, 2 input
AS/ECON 4070 3.0AF Answers to Assignment 1 October 008 economy. Q1. Find the equation of the production possibility curve in the following good, input Food and clothing are both produced using labour and
More informationNot 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.
Econ 400, Final Exam Name: There are three questions taken from the material covered so far in the course. ll questions are equally weighted. If you have a question, please raise your hand and I will come
More informationEconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key
EconS 44 Strategy and Game Theory Homework #5 Answer Key Exercise #1 Collusion among N doctors Consider an infinitely repeated game, in which there are nn 3 doctors, who have created a partnership. In
More informationGS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2008
GS/ECON 500 Answers to Assignment November 008 Q. Find the profit function, supply function, and unconditional input demand functions for a firm with a production function f(x, x ) = x + ln (x + ) (do
More informationAnswers to Problem Set 4
Answers to Problem Set 4 Economics 703 Spring 016 1. a) The monopolist facing no threat of entry will pick the first cost function. To see this, calculate profits with each one. With the first cost function,
More informationIn Class Exercises. Problem 1
In Class Exercises Problem 1 A group of n students go to a restaurant. Each person will simultaneously choose his own meal but the total bill will be shared amongst all the students. If a student chooses
More informationStrategic Production Game 1
Lec5-6.doc Strategic Production Game Consider two firms, which have to make production decisions without knowing what the other is doing. For simplicity we shall suppose that the product is essentially
More informationAgenda. Game Theory Matrix Form of a Game Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategy Nash Equilibrium Game Trees Subgame Perfection
Game Theory 1 Agenda Game Theory Matrix Form of a Game Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategy Nash Equilibrium Game Trees Subgame Perfection 2 Game Theory Game theory is the study of a set of tools that
More informationStrategic Trade Policy unotes14.pdf Chapter Environment: imperfectly competitive firms with increasing returns to scale.
Strategic Trade Policy unotes14.pdf Chapter 20 1 1. Environment: imperfectly competitive firms with increasing returns to scale. 2. Simplest model: three countries. US, EU, and ROW. US and EU each have
More informationSolutions to Homework 3
Solutions to Homework 3 AEC 504 - Summer 2007 Fundamentals of Economics c 2007 Alexander Barinov 1 Price Discrimination Consider a firm with MC = AC = 2, which serves two markets with demand functions
More informationEconomics 111 Exam 1 Spring 2008 Prof Montgomery. Answer all questions. Explanations can be brief. 100 points possible.
Economics 111 Exam 1 Spring 2008 Prof Montgomery Answer all questions. Explanations can be brief. 100 points possible. 1) [36 points] Suppose that, within the state of Wisconsin, market demand for cigarettes
More informationLECTURE 17: STRATEGIC INTERACTION
LECTURE 17: STRATEGIC INTERACTION Today s Topics: Oligopoly 1. Tw o Sellers: price takers versus a monopoly (car tel) versus... 2. A Cournot Duopoly: payoff matrices, dominant strategies, Nash Equilibrium.
More informationPublic Schemes for Efficiency in Oligopolistic Markets
経済研究 ( 明治学院大学 ) 第 155 号 2018 年 Public Schemes for Efficiency in Oligopolistic Markets Jinryo TAKASAKI I Introduction Many governments have been attempting to make public sectors more efficient. Some socialistic
More informationName: Midterm #1 EconS 425 (February 20 th, 2015)
Name: Midterm # EconS 425 (February 20 th, 205) Question # [25 Points] Player 2 L R Player L (9,9) (0,8) R (8,0) (7,7) a) By inspection, what are the pure strategy Nash equilibria? b) Find the additional
More informationEstimating Market Power in Differentiated Product Markets
Estimating Market Power in Differentiated Product Markets Metin Cakir Purdue University December 6, 2010 Metin Cakir (Purdue) Market Equilibrium Models December 6, 2010 1 / 28 Outline Outline Estimating
More informationAntoine Augustine Cournot was a French mathematician who, in 1838, wrote a book entitled Researches
University of California, Davis Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics ARE 5 Optimization with Economic Applications Lecture Notes 8 Quirino Paris Oligopoly.......................................................................
More informationCUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 12
CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 12 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO May 24, 2016 Announcements Homework #4 is due next week. Review of Last Lecture In extensive games with imperfect information,
More informationProblem Set 2 Answers
Problem Set 2 Answers BPH8- February, 27. Note that the unique Nash Equilibrium of the simultaneous Bertrand duopoly model with a continuous price space has each rm playing a wealy dominated strategy.
More informationTitle: The Relative-Profit-Maximization Objective of Private Firms and Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly
Working Paper Series No. 09007(Econ) China Economics and Management Academy China Institute for Advanced Study Central University of Finance and Economics Title: The Relative-Profit-Maximization Objective
More informationEconomics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna
Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna April 14, 2015 Outline 1. Oligopoly: Cournot 2. Oligopoly: Bertrand 3. Second-price Auction 4. Auctions: ebay Evidence 1 Oligopoly: Cournot Nicholson, Ch.
More informationMicroeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems
Microeconomics II CIDE, MsC Economics List of Problems 1. There are three people, Amy (A), Bart (B) and Chris (C): A and B have hats. These three people are arranged in a room so that B can see everything
More information