Microeconomics I. Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Microeconomics I. Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics"

Transcription

1 Microeconomics I Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics Academic year Second test 1st Semester January 11, 2012 Fernando Branco (fbranco@ucp.pt) Fernando Machado (fsm@ucp.pt) Bruno Pereira, Daniel Horta, Duarte Ribeiro, João Coelho, and Nuno Clara NOTES: 1. Duration: 2:30 hours. 2. Different groups must be answered in separated sheets. 3. The use of (non-graphical) calculators is allowed. 4. This is a closed book and closed notes test. 5. GOOD LUCK. I (4.5 points) Firms and form a duopoly of a homogeneous good. Both firms have marginal costs of 3 and no fixed costs. The market demand function is given by D( p) ( 9 p) 2 =. a) (1.5 points) Determine the quantities of the Cournot equilibrium. What are the equilibrium price and the profits of each firm? b) (1.5 points) Firm has the possibility of investing in a new production technology, which would reduce its marginal cost to 2. However, if firm decides to invest, firm will know it and will decide faster taking the lead in this quantity setting duopoly. Should firm invest? c) (1.5 points) The Competition Authority (CA) is sure that in the long-run both firms will adopt the new technology. Concerned with the firms market power, the CA is considering imposing that both firms are divided in n firms, so that in the equilibrium the price does not exceed 1.5 of the cost. How much should n be? 1/3

2 II (4.5 points) Consider the following description of the payoffs of a game: Each player must choose between the actions L and R ; If both players choose L, player A will get 3 and player B will get 2; If both players choose R, player A will get 2 and player B will get 1; If player A chooses L and player B chooses R, both players will get 0; If player A chooses R and player B chooses L, player A will get 4 and player B will get 0. a) (1.5 points) Represent the payoff matrix of the game, and identify the Nash equilibria. b) (1.5 points) Suppose now that the players play in sequence: first player A then player B. Determine all Nash equilibria. If you obtain more than one equilibrium, is there any reason to consider that one of them is more likely? Why? c) (1.5 points) Imagine now that the payoff of player A, when both players choose L, is x. If the players play the simultaneous choice game infinitely, what is the interval for x that generates ( L, L) as a subgame perfect equilibrium of the repeated game. III (5.0 points) Consider the problem of an investor that has an amount of to invest. He may invest it in a safe asset that generates in one year year 1.05 or invest it in a risky asset which might generate in one 1. 1, with known probability p, but may generate 0, with the remaining probability. This investor has an utility function U ( w) = w, and assume that the discount factor is 1. a) (1.5 points) If the investor must invest in one of the assets only, which asset should he select? b) (2.0 points) Suppose now that the investor can invest in both assets. Identify the optimal investment for this investor. 2/3

3 c) (1.5 points) Suppose now that the probability p depends on some actions taken by a second agent that can not be observed by the investor. What type of problem of asymmetric information is this and why? How can this affect the optimal investment policy? IV (6.0 points) a) (2.0 points) In the equilibrium of a monopolistically competitive market there are more firms than there would be if all firms produce with the minimum average cost. Comment. b) (2.0 points) Describe the dominant firm model and the equilibrium it predicts in a market. c) (2.0 points) Explain why in private value auctions when bidders are risk averse, the English auction yields a lower expected revenue to the seller than the first price auction. 3/3

4 Microeconomics I Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics Academic year Second test 1st Semester January 11, 2012 Fernando Branco (fbranco@ucp.pt) Fernando Machado (fsm@ucp.pt) Bruno Pereira, Daniel Horta, Duarte Ribeiro, João Coelho, and Nuno Clara NOTES: 1. Duration: 2:30 hours. 2. Different groups must be answered in separated sheets. 3. The use of (non-graphical) calculators is allowed. 4. This is a closed book and closed notes test. 5. GOOD LUCK. I (4.5 points) Firms and form a duopoly of a homogeneous good. Both firms have marginal costs of 3 and no fixed costs. The market demand function is given by D( p) ( 9 p) 2 =. a) (1.5 points) Determine the quantities of the Cournot equilibrium. What are the equilibrium price and the profits of each firm? Solution: Firm will solve the problem: Max ( 9 2( q + q )) q 3q. Firm will solve a similar problem. These lead to the equilibrium conditions q = q = 1, and so p = 5 and π π = 2 = b) (1.5 points) Firm has the possibility of investing in a new production technology, which would reduce its marginal cost to 2. However, if firm decides to invest, firm will know it and will decide faster taking the lead in this quantity setting duopoly. Should firm invest? Solution: If it invests, firm will be a follower in a Stackelberg duopoly. Its problem will be: Max 9 2 q + q q 2q. ( ( )) 1/2

5 leading to q ( 2q ) 4 =. Then firm will solve the problem: 7 7 2q y Max with the solution q = 5 4. So, q = 9 8, p =17 4, and π = So, the cost of the investment does not exceed 17 32, the investment should be made. c) (1.5 points) The Competition Authority (CA) is sure that in the long-run both firms will adopt the new technology. Concerned with the firms market power, the CA is considering imposing that both firms are divided in n firms, so that in the equilibrium the price does not exceed 1.5 of the cost. How much should n be? Solution: To get the target price cost margin the equilibrium price needs to be p = 3, and so the total quantity will also be 3, and the elasticity 0.5. Using the equilibrium condition p c p = 1 2nε one concludes that n = 3. ( ) ( ) + q q 3q II (4.5 points) Consider the following description of the payoffs of a game: Each player must choose between the actions L and R ; If both players choose L, player A will get 3 and player B will get 2; If both players choose R, player A will get 2 and player B will get 1; If player A chooses L and player B chooses R, both players will get 0; If player A chooses R and player B chooses L, player A will get 4 and player B will get 0. a) (1.5 points) Represent the payoff matrix of the game, and identify the Nash equilibria. Solution: The payoff matrix is the following: Player B L R L 3,2 0,0 Player A R 4,0 2,1 R, R. This game has a unique Nash equilibrium: ( ) b) (1.5 points) Suppose now that the players play in sequence: first player A then player B. Determine all Nash equilibria. If you obtain more than one equilibrium, is there any reason to consider that one of them is more likely? Why? 2/2

6 Solution: The payoff matrix in this case will be: Player B ( L, L ) ( L, R) ( R, L) ( R, R) L 3,2 3,2 0,0 0,0 Player A R 4,0 2,1 4,0 2,1 This game has two Nash equilibria: ( L, ( L, R) ) and ( R,( R, R) ). The equilibrium ( L, ( L, R) ) is more reasonable as it is the subgame perfect equilibrium. c) (1.5 points) Imagine now that the payoff of player A, when both players choose L, is x. If the players play the simultaneous choice game infinitely, what is the interval for x that generates ( L, L) as a subgame perfect equilibrium of the repeated game. Solution: Then 2 ( 2 δ ) x. III (5.0 points) Consider the problem of an investor that has an amount of to invest. He may invest it in a safe asset that generates in one year year 1.05 or invest it in a risky asset which might generate in one 1. 1, with known probability p, but may generate 0, with the remaining probability. This investor has an utility function U ( w) = w, and assume that the discount factor is 1. a) (1.5 points) If the investor must invest in one of the assets only, which asset should he select? Solution: He should invest only in the riskless asset if: 1.05 > p 1. 1 p < b) (2.0 points) Suppose now that the investor can invest in both assets. Identify the optimal investment for this investor. Solution: The optimal investment will result from: Max p α α leading to α = p ( ) c) (1.5 points) Suppose now that the probability p depends on some actions taken by a second agent that can not be observed by the investor. What type of problem of asymmetric information is this and why? How can this affect the optimal investment policy? Solution: This is a problem of moral hazard. It may affect the optimal investment as the probability will be chosen by the agent to his own interest. In particular, if higher values of the probability has more costly to the agent, this alternative asset may be of no interest. 3/2

7 IV (6.0 points) a) (2.0 points) In the equilibrium of a monopolistically competitive market there are more firms than there would be if all firms produce with the minimum average cost. Comment. Solution: If the firms produced with the minimum average cost each of the firms would produce more than in the monopolistically competitive equilibrium. However the price would be smaller, and so global demand would be larger. Therefore, it does not seem possible to say, in general, whether there would be more or less firms. b) (2.0 points) Describe the dominant firm model and the equilibrium it predicts in a market. Solution: The slides of the lectures provide a detailed description. c) (2.0 points) Explain why in private value auctions when bidders are risk averse, the English auction yields a lower expected revenue to the seller than the first price auction. Solution: If bidders are risk neutral the two auctions yield the same expected revenue. The equilibrium bid in the English auction does not depend on the bidder s position towards risk. To the contrary, in the first price auction risk averse bid higher than would risk neutral bidders, so reducing the uncertainty they face. Hence, the result. 4/2

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final

More information

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015 CUR 41: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 015 Instructions: Please write your name in English. This exam is closed-book. Total time: 10 minutes. There are 4 questions,

More information

Game Theory. Important Instructions

Game Theory. Important Instructions Prof. Dr. Anke Gerber Game Theory 2. Exam Summer Term 2012 Important Instructions 1. There are 90 points on this 90 minutes exam. 2. You are not allowed to use any material (books, lecture notes etc.).

More information

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final

More information

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014 Simon Fraser University Spring 2014 Econ 302 D200 Final Exam Solution This brief solution guide does not have the explanations necessary for full marks. NE = Nash equilibrium, SPE = subgame perfect equilibrium,

More information

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

MKTG 555: Marketing Models MKTG 555: Marketing Models A Brief Introduction to Game Theory for Marketing February 14-21, 2017 1 Basic Definitions Game: A situation or context in which players (e.g., consumers, firms) make strategic

More information

M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1

M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1 M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term.. Private Provision of Public Good. Consider the following public good game:

More information

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma Recap Last class (September 20, 2016) Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma Today (October 13, 2016) Finitely

More information

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 2017

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 2017 Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 07. (40 points) Consider a Cournot duopoly. The market price is given by q q, where q and q are the quantities of output produced

More information

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information Backward Induction in dynamic games of imperfect information We start at the end of the trees first find the Nash equilibrium (NE) of the last subgame

More information

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9 CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO May 22, 2015 Announcements HW #3 is due next week. Ch. 6.1: Ultimatum Game This is a simple game that can model a very simplified

More information

In Class Exercises. Problem 1

In Class Exercises. Problem 1 In Class Exercises Problem 1 A group of n students go to a restaurant. Each person will simultaneously choose his own meal but the total bill will be shared amongst all the students. If a student chooses

More information

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4) Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4) Outline: Modeling by means of games Normal form games Dominant strategies; dominated strategies,

More information

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information 1 Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Wang 2012/12/13 (Lecture 9, Micro Theory I) Simultaneous Move Games An Example One or more players know preferences only probabilistically (cf. Harsanyi, 1976-77)

More information

Microeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems

Microeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems Microeconomics II CIDE, MsC Economics List of Problems 1. There are three people, Amy (A), Bart (B) and Chris (C): A and B have hats. These three people are arranged in a room so that B can see everything

More information

HW Consider the following game:

HW Consider the following game: HW 1 1. Consider the following game: 2. HW 2 Suppose a parent and child play the following game, first analyzed by Becker (1974). First child takes the action, A 0, that produces income for the child,

More information

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics In the Name of God Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Microeconomics (for MBA students) 44111 (1393-94 1 st term) - Group 2 Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi Game Theory Game:

More information

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves University of Illinois Spring 01 ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves Due: Reading: Thursday, April 11 at beginning of class

More information

ECON106P: Pricing and Strategy

ECON106P: Pricing and Strategy ECON106P: Pricing and Strategy Yangbo Song Economics Department, UCLA June 30, 2014 Yangbo Song UCLA June 30, 2014 1 / 31 Game theory Game theory is a methodology used to analyze strategic situations in

More information

Economics Honors Exam 2009 Solutions: Microeconomics, Questions 1-2

Economics Honors Exam 2009 Solutions: Microeconomics, Questions 1-2 Economics Honors Exam 2009 Solutions: Microeconomics, Questions 1-2 Question 1 (Microeconomics, 30 points). A ticket to a newly staged opera is on sale through sealed-bid auction. There are three bidders,

More information

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Answer Key: Problem Set 4 Answer Key: Problem Set 4 Econ 409 018 Fall A reminder: An equilibrium is characterized by a set of strategies. As emphasized in the class, a strategy is a complete contingency plan (for every hypothetical

More information

Game Theory: Additional Exercises

Game Theory: Additional Exercises Game Theory: Additional Exercises Problem 1. Consider the following scenario. Players 1 and 2 compete in an auction for a valuable object, for example a painting. Each player writes a bid in a sealed envelope,

More information

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis EC 202 Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I George Symeonidis Oligopoly When only a small number of firms compete in the same market, each firm has some market power. Moreover, their interactions cannot be ignored.

More information

DUOPOLY. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. July 2017 Frank Cowell: Duopoly. Almost essential Monopoly

DUOPOLY. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. July 2017 Frank Cowell: Duopoly. Almost essential Monopoly Prerequisites Almost essential Monopoly Useful, but optional Game Theory: Strategy and Equilibrium DUOPOLY MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell 1 Overview Duopoly Background How the basic

More information

Lecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models

Lecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models Lecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models Managerial Economics November 16, 2012 Prof. Dr. Sebastian Rausch Centre for Energy Policy and Economics Department of Management, Technology and Economics ETH Zürich

More information

Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to.

Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to. 1 Econ 101A Final Exam Th 15 December. Please solve Problem 1, 2, and 3 in the first blue book and Problems 4 and 5 in the

More information

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017 Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 017 1. Sheila moves first and chooses either H or L. Bruce receives a signal, h or l, about Sheila s behavior. The distribution

More information

The Nash equilibrium of the stage game is (D, R), giving payoffs (0, 0). Consider the trigger strategies:

The Nash equilibrium of the stage game is (D, R), giving payoffs (0, 0). Consider the trigger strategies: Problem Set 4 1. (a). Consider the infinitely repeated game with discount rate δ, where the strategic fm below is the stage game: B L R U 1, 1 2, 5 A D 2, 0 0, 0 Sketch a graph of the players payoffs.

More information

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna November 11, 2009 Outline 1. Oligopoly: Cournot 2. Oligopoly: Bertrand 3. Second-price Auction 4. Auctions: ebay Evidence 1 Oligopoly: Cournot Nicholson,

More information

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017 G5212: Game Theory Mark Dean Spring 2017 Why Game Theory? So far your microeconomic course has given you many tools for analyzing economic decision making What has it missed out? Sometimes, economic agents

More information

1 Solutions to Homework 3

1 Solutions to Homework 3 1 Solutions to Homework 3 1.1 163.1 (Nash equilibria of extensive games) 1. 164. (Subgames) Karl R E B H B H B H B H B H B H There are 6 proper subgames, beginning at every node where or chooses an action.

More information

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves.

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves. Econ 221 Fall, 2018 Li, Hao UBC CHAPTER 3. GAMES WITH SEQUENTIAL MOVES Game trees. Sequential-move games with finite number of decision notes. Sequential-move games with Nature s moves. 1 Strategies in

More information

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition Kai Hao Yang /2/207 In this lecture, we will apply the concepts in game theory to study oligopoly. In short, unlike

More information

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna April 14, 2015 Outline 1. Oligopoly: Cournot 2. Oligopoly: Bertrand 3. Second-price Auction 4. Auctions: ebay Evidence 1 Oligopoly: Cournot Nicholson, Ch.

More information

Econ 302 Assignment 3 Solution. a 2bQ c = 0, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated price is. P (Q) = a b

Econ 302 Assignment 3 Solution. a 2bQ c = 0, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated price is. P (Q) = a b Econ 302 Assignment 3 Solution. (a) The monopolist solves: The first order condition is max Π(Q) = Q(a bq) cq. Q a Q c = 0, or equivalently, Q = a c, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated

More information

MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE

MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE Problem Set 1 These questions will go over basic game-theoretic concepts and some applications. homework is due during class on week 4. This [1] In this problem (see Fudenberg-Tirole

More information

AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July time : 1 hour. Do all 4 questions. All count equally.

AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July time : 1 hour. Do all 4 questions. All count equally. AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July 2017 time : 1 hour Do all 4 questions. All count equally. Q1. Monopoly is inefficient because the monopoly s owner makes high profits, and the monopoly s

More information

MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U8213 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 2001

MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U8213 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 2001 MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U813 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 001 Imperfect Competition Wednesday, March 1 st Reading: Pindyck/Rubinfeld Chapter 1 Strategic Interaction figure

More information

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. Department of Economics. January Written Portion of the Comprehensive Examination for

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. Department of Economics. January Written Portion of the Comprehensive Examination for THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Economics January 2014 Written Portion of the Comprehensive Examination for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy MICROECONOMIC THEORY Instructions: This examination

More information

Game Theory Lecture #16

Game Theory Lecture #16 Game Theory Lecture #16 Outline: Auctions Mechanism Design Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Mechanism Optimizing Social Welfare Goal: Entice players to select outcome which optimizes social welfare Examples: Traffic

More information

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4 CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO March 27, 2015 Homework #1 Homework #1 will be due at the end of class today. Please check the website later today for the solutions

More information

When one firm considers changing its price or output level, it must make assumptions about the reactions of its rivals.

When one firm considers changing its price or output level, it must make assumptions about the reactions of its rivals. Chapter 3 Oligopoly Oligopoly is an industry where there are relatively few sellers. The product may be standardized (steel) or differentiated (automobiles). The firms have a high degree of interdependence.

More information

Game Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium

Game Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium Game Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium Below are two different games. The first game has a dominant strategy equilibrium. The second game has two Nash

More information

Microeconomic Theory II Spring 2016 Final Exam Solutions

Microeconomic Theory II Spring 2016 Final Exam Solutions Microeconomic Theory II Spring 206 Final Exam Solutions Warning: Brief, incomplete, and quite possibly incorrect. Mikhael Shor Question. Consider the following game. First, nature (player 0) selects t

More information

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4 CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO March 22, 2015 Homework #1 Homework #1 will be due at the end of class today. Please check the website later today for the solutions

More information

Introduction to Game Theory

Introduction to Game Theory Introduction to Game Theory Part 2. Dynamic games of complete information Chapter 1. Dynamic games of complete and perfect information Ciclo Profissional 2 o Semestre / 2011 Graduação em Ciências Econômicas

More information

Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati.

Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. Module No. # 06 Illustrations of Extensive Games and Nash Equilibrium

More information

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly Exercise - Quantity competition 1 Take firm 1 s perspective Total revenue is R(q 1 = (4 q 1 q q 1 and, hence, marginal revenue is MR 1 (q 1 = 4 q 1 q Marginal cost is MC

More information

Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing

Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing May 22, 2017 May 22, 2017 1 / 19 Bertrand Duopoly: Undifferentiated Products Game (Bertrand) Firm and Firm produce identical products. Each firm simultaneously

More information

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average) Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, 2016 1. In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average) cost. To investigate the consequences of markup pricing,

More information

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV GAME THEORY SOLUTION SET 1 WINTER 018 PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV Introduction For suggested solution to problem 4, last year s suggested solutions by Tsz-Ning Wong were used who I think used suggested

More information

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers Chapter : Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers Learning Objectives Students should learn to:. Extend the reaction function ideas developed in the Cournot duopoly model to a model of sequential behavior

More information

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers Econ 5001 Spring 2018 Prof. James Peck The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers Note: There were 4 versions of the test: A, B, C, and D, based on player 1 s

More information

14.01 Principles of Microeconomics, Fall 2007 Chia-Hui Chen November 26, Lecture 28. Oligopoly

14.01 Principles of Microeconomics, Fall 2007 Chia-Hui Chen November 26, Lecture 28. Oligopoly Stackelberg.0 Principles of Microeconomics, Fall 2007 Chia-Hui Chen November 26, 2007 Lecture 28 Oligopoly Outline. Chap 2, 3: Stackelberg 2. Chap 2, 3: Bertr 3. Chap 2, 3: Prisoner s Dilemma In the discussion

More information

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L. Econ 400, Final Exam Name: There are three questions taken from the material covered so far in the course. ll questions are equally weighted. If you have a question, please raise your hand and I will come

More information

Player 2 L R M H a,a 7,1 5,0 T 0,5 5,3 6,6

Player 2 L R M H a,a 7,1 5,0 T 0,5 5,3 6,6 Question 1 : Backward Induction L R M H a,a 7,1 5,0 T 0,5 5,3 6,6 a R a) Give a definition of the notion of a Nash-Equilibrium! Give all Nash-Equilibria of the game (as a function of a)! (6 points) b)

More information

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 5

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 5 Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 5 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO Oct. 23, 2015 Administrative Stuff Homework 2 is due next week. Due to the change in material covered, I have decided to change the grading system

More information

MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE

MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE Answers to Problem Set 2 [1] (a) This is standard (we have even done it in class). The one-shot Cournot outputs can be computed to be A/3, while the payoff to each firm can

More information

Answers to Problem Set 4

Answers to Problem Set 4 Answers to Problem Set 4 Economics 703 Spring 016 1. a) The monopolist facing no threat of entry will pick the first cost function. To see this, calculate profits with each one. With the first cost function,

More information

Economics 212 Microeconomic Theory Final Exam. April 24, Faculty of Arts and Sciences Queen s University

Economics 212 Microeconomic Theory Final Exam. April 24, Faculty of Arts and Sciences Queen s University Page 1 of 12 pages Economics 212 Microeconomic Theory Final Exam April 24, 2006 Faculty of Arts and Sciences Queen s University Instructions The exam is three hours in length. The exam consists of two

More information

Microeconomics I - Seminar #9, April 17, Suggested Solution

Microeconomics I - Seminar #9, April 17, Suggested Solution Microeconomics I - Seminar #9, April 17, 009 - Suggested Solution Problem 1: (Bertrand competition). Total cost function of two firms selling computers is T C 1 = T C = 15q. If these two firms compete

More information

Markets with Intermediaries

Markets with Intermediaries Markets with Intermediaries Episode Baochun Li Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto Network Models of Markets with Intermediaries (Chapter ) Who sets the prices?

More information

Markets with Intermediaries

Markets with Intermediaries Markets with Intermediaries Part III: Dynamics Episode Baochun Li Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto Required reading: Networks, Crowds, and Markets, Chapter..5 Who

More information

Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30)

Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30) Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30) Problem (1) (8 points) Consider the following lobbying game between two firms. Each firm may lobby

More information

Microeconomics III. Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 2012) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya

Microeconomics III. Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 2012) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya Microeconomics III Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 01) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya Oligopoly is a market in which only a few firms compete with one another,

More information

Econ 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009.

Econ 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009. Econ 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 and 2 in the first Blue Book and Problems 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A

More information

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I Homework 1, due in recitation on 10/18/2018. 1. Consider the following strategic game: player 1/player 2 L R U 1,1 0,0 D 0,0 3,2 Any NE can be

More information

Economics 502 April 3, 2008

Economics 502 April 3, 2008 Second Midterm Answers Prof. Steven Williams Economics 502 April 3, 2008 A full answer is expected: show your work and your reasoning. You can assume that "equilibrium" refers to pure strategies unless

More information

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. August 2010

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. August 2010 Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination August 200 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,

More information

Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version)

Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version) Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version) July 4, 2017 1. Person A lexicographically prefers good x to good y, i.e., when comparing two bundles of x and y, she strictly prefers

More information

Microeconomics I 2011/12

Microeconomics I 2011/12 October 25, 2011 Undergraduate Programs Business Administration and Economics Microeconomics I 2011/12 Duration: 2h15m + 30 min Fernando Branco, Fernando Machado (Professors), Bruno Pereira, Daniel Horta,

More information

MS&E 246: Lecture 2 The basics. Ramesh Johari January 16, 2007

MS&E 246: Lecture 2 The basics. Ramesh Johari January 16, 2007 MS&E 246: Lecture 2 The basics Ramesh Johari January 16, 2007 Course overview (Mainly) noncooperative game theory. Noncooperative: Focus on individual players incentives (note these might lead to cooperation!)

More information

Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

Bayesian Nash Equilibrium Bayesian Nash Equilibrium We have already seen that a strategy for a player in a game of incomplete information is a function that specifies what action or actions to take in the game, for every possibletypeofthatplayer.

More information

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2012

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2012 UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 01A) Fall 01 Oligopolistic markets (PR 1.-1.5) Lectures 11-1 Sep., 01 Oligopoly (preface to game theory) Another form

More information

Microeconomics Qualifying Exam

Microeconomics Qualifying Exam Summer 2018 Microeconomics Qualifying Exam There are 100 points possible on this exam, 50 points each for Prof. Lozada s questions and Prof. Dugar s questions. Each professor asks you to do two long questions

More information

Econ 711 Homework 1 Solutions

Econ 711 Homework 1 Solutions Econ 711 Homework 1 s January 4, 014 1. 1 Symmetric, not complete, not transitive. Not a game tree. Asymmetric, not complete, transitive. Game tree. 1 Asymmetric, not complete, transitive. Not a game tree.

More information

Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form

Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form Chapter 6 Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form 1 Market game: one seller and one buyer 2 players, a buyer and a seller Buyer receives red card Ace=11, King = Queen = Jack = 10, 9,, 2 Number represents

More information

EconS Games with Incomplete Information II and Auction Theory

EconS Games with Incomplete Information II and Auction Theory EconS 424 - Games with Incomplete Information II and Auction Theory Félix Muñoz-García Washington State University fmunoz@wsu.edu April 28, 2014 Félix Muñoz-García (WSU) EconS 424 - Recitation 9 April

More information

Today. Applications of NE and SPNE Auctions English Auction Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auction First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction

Today. Applications of NE and SPNE Auctions English Auction Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auction First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction Today Applications of NE and SPNE Auctions English Auction Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auction First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction 2 / 26 Auctions Used to allocate: Art Government bonds Radio spectrum Forms: Sequential

More information

Strategy -1- Strategy

Strategy -1- Strategy Strategy -- Strategy A Duopoly, Cournot equilibrium 2 B Mixed strategies: Rock, Scissors, Paper, Nash equilibrium 5 C Games with private information 8 D Additional exercises 24 25 pages Strategy -2- A

More information

PRISONER S DILEMMA. Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions

PRISONER S DILEMMA. Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions ECO 300 Fall 2005 November 22 OLIGOPOLY PART 2 PRISONER S DILEMMA Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, 481-2 Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions X = 12 2 P + P, X = 12 2 P + P 1 1 2 2 2 1

More information

Francesco Nava Microeconomic Principles II EC202 Lent Term 2010

Francesco Nava Microeconomic Principles II EC202 Lent Term 2010 Answer Key Problem Set 1 Francesco Nava Microeconomic Principles II EC202 Lent Term 2010 Please give your answers to your class teacher by Friday of week 6 LT. If you not to hand in at your class, make

More information

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2013 *********************************************** COVER SHEET ***********************************************

More information

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.

More information

ECO410H: Practice Questions 2 SOLUTIONS

ECO410H: Practice Questions 2 SOLUTIONS ECO410H: Practice Questions SOLUTIONS 1. (a) The unique Nash equilibrium strategy profile is s = (M, M). (b) The unique Nash equilibrium strategy profile is s = (R4, C3). (c) The two Nash equilibria are

More information

In reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219

In reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219 Repeated Games Basic lesson of prisoner s dilemma: In one-shot interaction, individual s have incentive to behave opportunistically Leads to socially inefficient outcomes In reality; some cases of prisoner

More information

Spring 2017 Final Exam

Spring 2017 Final Exam Spring 07 Final Exam ECONS : Strategy and Game Theory Tuesday May, :0 PM - 5:0 PM irections : Complete 5 of the 6 questions on the exam. You will have a minimum of hours to complete this final exam. No

More information

Economics 171: Final Exam

Economics 171: Final Exam Question 1: Basic Concepts (20 points) Economics 171: Final Exam 1. Is it true that every strategy is either strictly dominated or is a dominant strategy? Explain. (5) No, some strategies are neither dominated

More information

EXTRA PROBLEMS. and. a b c d

EXTRA PROBLEMS. and. a b c d EXTRA PROBLEMS (1) In the following matching problem, each college has the capacity for only a single student (each college will admit only one student). The colleges are denoted by A, B, C, D, while the

More information

1 Solutions to Homework 4

1 Solutions to Homework 4 1 Solutions to Homework 4 1.1 Q1 Let A be the event that the contestant chooses the door holding the car, and B be the event that the host opens a door holding a goat. A is the event that the contestant

More information

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key EconS 44 Strategy and Game Theory Homework #5 Answer Key Exercise #1 Collusion among N doctors Consider an infinitely repeated game, in which there are nn 3 doctors, who have created a partnership. In

More information

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam June 2009 Instructions: (1) Please answer each of the four questions on separate pieces of paper. (2) When finished, please arrange your answers alphabetically (in the

More information

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015. FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.) Hints for Problem Set 3 1. Consider the following strategic

More information

Games of Incomplete Information

Games of Incomplete Information Games of Incomplete Information EC202 Lectures V & VI Francesco Nava London School of Economics January 2011 Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures V & VI Jan 2011 1 / 22 Summary Games of Incomplete Information: Definitions:

More information

Econ 414 Midterm Exam

Econ 414 Midterm Exam Econ 44 Midterm Exam Name: There are three questions taken from the material covered so far in the course. All questions are equally weighted. If you have a question, please raise your hand and I will

More information

REPEATED GAMES. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. Frank Cowell: Repeated Games. Almost essential Game Theory: Dynamic.

REPEATED GAMES. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. Frank Cowell: Repeated Games. Almost essential Game Theory: Dynamic. Prerequisites Almost essential Game Theory: Dynamic REPEATED GAMES MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell April 2018 1 Overview Repeated Games Basic structure Embedding the game in context

More information

(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility?

(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility? GAME THEORY EXAM (with SOLUTIONS) January 20 P P2 P3 P4 INSTRUCTIONS: Write your answers in the space provided immediately after each question. You may use the back of each page. The duration of this exam

More information

ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2017

ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2017 ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2017 These notes have been used and commented on before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please

More information

By the end of this course, and having completed the Essential readings and activities, you should:

By the end of this course, and having completed the Essential readings and activities, you should: Important note This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the academic year 013 14. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years,

More information

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2 6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2 Daron Acemoglu and Asu Ozdaglar MIT October 14, 2009 1 Introduction Outline Review Examples of Pure Strategy Nash Equilibria Mixed Strategies

More information