Pakistan Fertilizer Sector

Transcription

1 Aug-16 Sep-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Fertilizer Sector Report Pressure on margin set to continue; Maintain Marketweight Chemical sector Performance 3M 6M 12M Absolute % -4% -11% 4% Relative to KSE % 0% -6% -15% Chemical Sector vs. KSE100 Source: PSX 40% Chemicals KSE100 Index 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% Source: PSX Provisional Fertilizer Offtake for Jul 17 (000' tons) Jul 17 MoM YoY Urea FFC % -56% EFERT 74-77% -73% FATIMA 31-62% 6% FFBL 43-51% -50% NFML 46-6% NA Industry Total % DAP FFBL % 6% FFC % 489% EFERT % 2% Industry total % 0.11 Urea Exports FFC % NA EFERT 50 19% NA Industry Total 70 36% NA REP Latest updates on urea prices and sales are not encouraging. Provisional offtake numbers for Jul 17 indicate expected decline in urea sales by 68% MoM on the back of high base effect in anticipation of reduction in cash subsidy while DAP offtake jumped by 97% MoM. Despite peak demand season, prices remained under pressure ranging between PKR1,200-1,280/bag, with NFML being an exception (MRP of PKR1,000/bag). We believe price pressure on both export and domestic front is likely to weigh on margins for our fertilizer universe in 2H17. We maintain our Marketweight stance on the sector with Engro Fertilizer (EFERT) as our top pick given company's low cost of production enabling it to weather the pricing pressures better than its peers. Lower urea and higher DAP offtake witnessed in Jul 17: As per our channel checks, Urea offtake for Jul-17 dropped 68%/56% MoM/YoY to 340k tons owing to (i) high-base effect, and (ii) sowing season for Kharif approaching its end. DAP offtake, on the other hand, is expected to jump by 97%/11% MoM/YoY to 220k tons fully reflecting the seasonal growth. On a cumulative basis, Urea/DAP offtake increased by 17%/18% YoY to 3.04/0.81mn tons in 7MCY17.Urea inventory for the month is expected to surge slightly to 1.15mn tons (20% of annual sales) with FFC holding the highest inventory of 475kton. Subsidy on DAP has continued unabated with certain changes in mechanism (cash subsidy substituted with GST adjustment). This allowed seasonal pick-up in DAP demand to be fully reflected on monthly sales. Exports surged 36% MoM; retention prices declined: Urea exports also shot up in Jul 17 by 36% MoM to ~70k tons, restricting the inventory pile-up from lower local off-take to some extent (inventory is expected to close the month at 1.15mn tons level). EFERT contributed to bulk of exports and managed to sell ~50k tons followed by FFC (18ktons). However, retention prices for exports remained at the lower end ranging from USD /ton (1HCY17 average: USD /ton). Pricing pressure on local sales remains: Despite peak demand season, urea prices remained under pressure where a PKR50-100/bag jump in prices witnessed in first week of Jul'17 did not last for long owing to limited demand and huge stock piling by dealers during Jun'17 in anticipation of changes in subsidy. Urea prices during Jul'17 ranged between PKR1,200-1,280/bag, with NFML being an exception (MRP of PKR1,000/bag). Weak margin environment may persist for now: We believe pricing pressure on both export and domestic front is likely to weigh on margins for our fertilizer universe in 2H17 where prevailing local realized prices are at a 15% premium to international prices compared to an average of 10% discount witnessed in CY16. We believe current downward trend in international prices (came off by 12-32% from its high seen in Jan 17) is likely to persist in the near-term and may put pressure on local industry in two possible ways: (i) elimination of exports on being unviable (industry s average breakeven cost stands at USD225/ton), and (ii) threat of low cost urea imports to facilitate farmers in case international prices decline by another USD5-10/ton (translating into landed cost of PKR1,200/bag vs industry s prevailing average realized price of PKR1,300-1,380/bag). That said, we believe, fertilizer industry currently faces two options: (i) export at a price below breakeven cost which we believe is more preferred option, or (ii) let go the option of exports while taking a hit in terms of inventory carrying cost where increasing stock pile will continue to haunt. Research Analyst Syeda Humaira Akhtar, FRM humaira.akhtar@bmacapital.com

2 Pricing pressure likely to impact margins in 2HCY17; top pick is EFERT Provisional offtake numbers for Jul 17 indicate expected decline in urea sales by 68% MoM on the back of high base effect in anticipation of reduction in cash subsidy while DAP offtake jumped by 97% MoM. Subsidy on DAP has continued unabated with certain changes in mechanism (cash subsidy substituted with GST adjustment). This allowed seasonal pick-up in DAP demand to be fully reflected on monthly sales. Urea exports also shot up in Jul 17 by 36% MoM to ~70k tons, restricting the inventory pile-up from lower local off-take to some extent (inventory is expected to close the month at 1.15mn tons level). We believe price pressure on both export and domestic front is likely to weigh on margins for our fertilizer universe in 2HCY17. We maintain our Marketweight stance on the sector with Engro Fertilizer (EFERT) as our top pick given company's low cost of production enabling it to weather the pricing pressures better than its peers. Lower urea and higher DAP offtake witnessed in Jul 17 As per the provisional numbers, Urea offtake for Jul-17 dropped 68%/56% MoM/YoY to 340k tons owing to (i) high-base effect where Jun 17 sales marked the highest ever offtake for fertilizer industry as dealers built-up inventories in anticipation of decline in subsidy from Jul 17, and (ii) sowing season for Kharif approaching its end. DAP offtake, on the other hand, is expected to jump by 97%/11% MoM/YoY to 220k tons fully reflecting the seasonal growth. Fatima Fertilizer (FATIMA) once again outperformed the industry with 6% YoY growth in urea offtake, courtesy aggressive price discounts. National Fertilizer Marketing Limited (NFML) also managed to sell 46ktons. Urea inventory for the month is expected to surge slightly to 1.15mn tons with Fauji Fertilizer Company (FFC) holding the highest inventory of 475ktons (41% of total industry inventory). On a cumulative basis, Urea/DAP offtake increased by 17%/18% YoY to 3.04/0.81mn tons in 7MCY17. Provisional Urea Exports (000' tons) Jul-17 MoM FFC % EFERT 50 19% Industry total 0 36% Provisional Fertilizer offtake for Jul'17 (000' tons) Jul-17 MoM YoY 7MCY17 YoY Urea FFC % -56% % EFERT 74-77% -73% % FATIMA 31-62% 6% % FFBL 43-51% -50% 241 0% NFML 46-6% NA % Industry total % -56% % DAP FFBL % 6% % FFC % 489% % EFERT % 2% % Industry total % 11% % Exports surged 36% MoM; retention prices declined Exports shot up during Jul'17, thus playing a major role in containing significant surge in stock pile following lower local offtake. Total exports during the month stood at ~70k tons which is 36% MoM jump, mainly contributed by EFERT which managed to sell ~50k tons followed by FFC (18ktons). Major exports destinations during the month include Afghanistan, Kenya, Mozambique and Africa. However, retention prices for exports 2

3 Jun-13 Aug-13 Oct-13 Dec-13 Feb-14 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Oct-15 Dec-15 Feb-16 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-16 Dec-16 Feb-17 Jun-17 remained at the lower end ranging from USD /ton (1H17 average: USD /ton), where EFERT churned the best FOB price while others sold below the breakeven in some cases. Pricing pressure remains on home ground as well Despite peak demand season, urea prices remained under pressure during Jun-Jul'17 where a PKR50-100/bag jump in prices was witnessed in first week of Jul'17 after reduction in cash subsidy by the government (cash subsidy reduced from PKR156/bag to PKR100/bag for FY18), however the same did not last for long owing to limited demand and huge stock piling by dealers during Jun'17 in anticipation of changes in subsidy. Urea prices during Jul'17 ranged between PKR1,200-1,280/bag, with NFML being an exception (MRP of PKR1,000/bag). Urea primary margins shrinking with mounting price pressure amid sticky costs 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1, Gas cost Primary margin/bag Source: NFDC, BMA Research Weak margin environment may persist for now Earnings sensitivity if local urea prices decline by PKR50/bag Impact EPS (PKR) Base case (%) FFC* % EFERT % FATIMA % FFBL* % *Base case earnings are under review We believe pricing pressure on both export and domestic front is likely to weigh on margins for our fertilizer universe in 2HCY17 where prevailing local realized prices (PKR1,473/bag as of Jun 17) are at a 15% premium to international prices compared to an average 10% discount witnessed in CY16 (note that small players like Pak Arab, FATIMA etc are selling well below average industry levels and at par to current landed cost of imported urea i.e. PKR1,250/bag). International urea prices have come off by 12-32% from a high of USD280/260/ton for Middle East/China seen in Jan 17; Middle East Urea is currently trading at an average of USD190/ton while Chinese urea prices stands at USD229/ton (move to next para on intl prices). We believe current downward trend in international prices is likely to persist in the near-term and may put pressure on local industry in two possible ways: (i) elimination of exports as prevailing international prices are unfeasible for local manufacturers when compared to industry s average breakeven cost of USD225/ton, and (ii) in case international prices decline by another USD5-10/ton (translating into landed cost of PKR1,200/bag vs industry s prevailing average realized price of PKR1,300-1,380/bag and maximum retail price of PKR1,400/bag), import of low cost urea to facilitate farmers cannot be ruled out. This may also allow room for the government to cut current urea subsidy of PKR100/bag. That said, we expect pressure on 3

4 6-Jan-14 6-Mar-14 6-May-14 6-Jul-14 6-Sep-14 6-Nov-14 6-Jan-15 6-Mar-15 6-May-15 6-Jul-15 6-Sep-15 6-Nov-15 6-Jan-16 6-Mar-16 6-May-16 6-Jul-16 6-Sep-16 6-Nov-16 6-Jan-17 6-Mar-17 6-May-17 6-Jul-17 Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 Jan-16 Apr-16 Jul-16 Jan-17 margins for our fertilizer universe in 2H17, where industry currently faces two options: (i) export at a price below breakeven cost (a preferred option in our view), or (ii) let go the option of exports while taking a hit in terms of inventory carrying cost where increasing stock pile will continue to haunt. Local realized prices hovering at significant 15% premium to int l prices 3,800 3,400 3,000 2,600 2,200 1,800 1,400 Discount (RHS) Local Price of Prilled Urea International Price per bag 45% 35% 25% 15% 5% -5% -15% 1,000-25% International prices to remain soft Source: NFDC, BMA Research Our view of soft international prices is based on (i) significant global supply additions of 17Mt/+8% over E (90% of planned additions will be operational by 2018), (ii) weak agronomics and ample agricultural inventories leading to marginal demand growth (1.5%p.a growth expected by IFA), and (iii) increasing supply from other countries which would nullify China s (one of the largest urea exporter) recent policy to curb exports to fulfill local demand. International urea price on a downward trajectory Middle East Urea Chinese Urea Source: Bloomberg 4

5 Financials: Banks BMA Capital Management Limited Analyst Certification All research is based under the regulatory oversight of BMA Capital Management Limited, a Corporate Member of the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of (SECP). Each Analyst of BMA Capital Management Limited whose name appears as the Author of this Investment Research hereby certifies that the recommendation and opinions expressed in the Investment Research accurately reflect the Investment Analyst s personal, independent and objective views about any and all of the Designated Investments or Relevant Issuers discussed herein that are within such Investment Analyst s coverage Universe. Disclaimer BMA Capital Management Limited and / or any of its affiliates, which operate outside, do and seek to do business with the company (s) covered in this research document. BMA Capital Management Limited also expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for Corporate Finance services from the company covered herein in the next 6 months, excluding acting as a corporate broker, on a retained basis, for the relevant issuer. As such, investors should be aware that BMA Capital Management Limited may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this research report. Investors should consider this research report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. This research report is for information purposes only and does not constitute nor is it intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities or other financial instruments. Neither the information contained in this research report nor any future information made available with the subject matter contained herein will form the basis of any contract Information and opinions contained herein have been complied or arrived at by BMA Capital Management Limited from publicly available information and sources that BMA Capital Management Limited believed to be reliable. Whilst every care has been taken in preparing this research report, no research analyst, director, officer, employee, agent or adviser of any member of BMA Capital Management Limited gives or makes any representation, warranty or undertaking, whether express or implied, and accepts no responsibility or liability as to the reliability, accuracy or completeness of the information set out in this research report. Any responsibility or liability for any information contained herein is expressly disclaimed. All information contained herein is subject to change at any time without notice. No member of BMA Capital Management Limited has an obligation to update, modify or amend this research report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate, or if research on the subject company is withdrawn. Furthermore, past performance is not indicative of future results. The investments and strategies discussed herein may not be suitable for all investors or any particular class of investor. Investors should make their own investment decisions using their own independent advisors as they believe necessary and based upon their specific financial situations and investment objectives when investing. Investors should consult their independent advisors if they have any doubts as to the applicability to their business or investment objectives of the information and the strategies discussed herein. This research report is being furnished to certain persons as permitted by applicable law, and accordingly may not be reproduced or circulated to any other person without the prior written consent of a member of BMA Capital Management Limited. This research report may not be relied upon by any retail customers or person to whom this research report may not be provided by law. Unauthorized use or disclosure of this research report is strictly prohibited. Members of BMA Capital Management and/or their respective principals, directors, officers and employees may own, have positions or effect transactions in the securities or financial instruments referred herein or in the investments of any issuers discussed herein, may engage in securities transactions in a manner inconsistent with the research contained in this research report and with respect to securities or financial instruments covered by this research report, may sell to or buy from customers on a principal basis and may serve or act as director, placement agent, advisor or lender, or make a market in, or may have been a manager or a co-manager of the most recent public offering in respect of any investments or issuers of such securities or financial instruments referenced in this research report or may perform any other investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from any company mentioned in this research report. Members of BMA Capital Management Limited may have acted upon or used the information or conclusions contained in this research report, or the research or analysis on which they are based, before publication of this research report. Investing in involves a high degree of risk and many persons, physical and legal, may be restricted from dealing in the securities market of. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing. No part of the compensation of the authors of this research report was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views contained in the research report. By accepting this research report, you agree to be bound by the foregoing limitations. Rating Investors should carefully read the definitions of all rating used within every research reports. In addition, research reports carry an analyst s independent view and investors should ensure careful reading of the entire research reports and not infer its contents from the rating ascribed by the analyst. Ratings should not be used or relied upon as investment advice. An investor s decision to buy, hold or sell a stock should depend on said individual s circumstances and other considerations. BMA Capital Limited uses a three tier rating system: i) Overweight, ii) Market-weight and iii) Underweight (new rating system effective Feb 29 16) with our rating being based on total stock returns versus BMA s index target return for the year. A table presenting BMA s rating definitions is given below: Rating definitions Overweight Total stock return > expected market return + 2% Market-weight Expected market return ± 2% 18 July 2017 Underweight Total stock return < expected market return - 2% *Total stock return = capital gain + dividend yield