INVESTMENT STRATEGIES FOR NON-DIVIDEND PAYERS
|
|
- Matthew McKenzie
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ned Davis Research Group NDR Solutions Quarterly Investment Insight from NDR's Custom Solutions Team INVESTMENT STRATEGIES FOR NON-DIVIDEND PAYERS MARCH 2016 LUCY LIU, CFA Senior Research Analyst, Custom Research Solutions STEPHANIE O'BRIEN Research Analyst, Custom Research Solutions
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 1 Overview of U.S. and International Non-Dividend Payers... 2 Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks Are More Common in the U.S... 2 The Same Sector Can Have a Very Different Proportion of Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks Examining the Performance of Dividend Payers over Non-Payers... 5 Dividend Payers Have Outperformed Non-Payers Over the Long Run... 5 The Relative Performance Varies in Different Periods... 6 Explaining the Outperformance Under the Fama-French Framework Investment Strategies for U.S. Non-Payers... 9 Strategy A: Mimicking Dividend Payers... 9 Strategy B: Investing in Companies That Have Justifiable Reasons to Not Pay Dividends Comparing the U.S. Non-Payers' Strategies Both Strategies Have Outperformed the U.S. Market Both Strategies Exhibit Robust Performance Across Most Regimes Both Strategies Have Slightly Better Risk Profiles Than the U.S. Market Holdings Comparison Conclusion... 15
3 This edition of NDR Solutions Quarterly discusses investment strategies for non-dividend-paying stocks, which can be helpful for investors with taxable investment accounts. As originally stated, the goal of this publication is to provide our client base with unique investment ideas, tools, and analytical frameworks each quarter. Through this publication, the NDR Solutions team can showcase the varied skill sets and diverse experience we regularly provide to clients with direct engagement, customized output, and tailored solutions. As always, we welcome any feedback, as well as questions about our services, and hope that you find this publication insightful, unique, and useful. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the past two decades, dividend payers have outperformed non-dividend payers over the long run. However, after taking away some of the key qualities of dividend-paying stocks, such as lower market beta, higher market cap, and cheaper valuation, the outperformance of dividend-paying stocks over non-dividend paying stocks may be subdued, especially for the U.S. market. In the U.S., the percentage of stocks that are non-dividend-paying is much higher than it is in the rest of the developed world. Because of this, the U.S. market provides greater opportunities to form non-dividend-paying stocks investment strategies. Two investment strategies for non-dividend-paying stocks are discussed in this publication. The first strategy aims to select non-dividend-paying stocks that resemble dividend-paying stocks, and the second strategy screens for companies with justifiable reasons not to pay a dividend. The two strategies are quite different in nature, but both are able to generate comparable or better returns than an equal -weighted portfolio of dividend-paying stocks. INTRODUCTION Income-oriented investments have been quite popular given the U.S. demographic and the low interest rate environment. However, those investments may not be tax efficient for investors using taxable accounts. In reality, investors can have a good amount of investments in taxable accounts for various reasons. For individual investors, tax-deferred investment accounts, such as 401(k) and IRA are great investment vehicles. However, those accounts typically come with restrictions, such as early withdrawal penalties and contribution limits. For investors who prefer higher liquidity and flexibility of their wealth, they may not be willing to or be able to invest all their savings in those accounts. For institutional investors, some institutions such as foundations and endowments may enjoy tax-exempt status, but others may need to pay tax on investments too. Given the tax situation, it makes sense for investors to allocate as much high-yielding investment into tax-exempt or tax -deferred accounts, and keep low-yielding or non-yielding investments in the taxable account. In terms of stock investing, creating investment strategies for non-dividend-paying stocks can be just as important as creating investment strategies for dividend-paying stocks. In this paper, we present the following: Differences between non-dividend-paying stocks and their major contributing sectors in the U.S. versus the rest of the developed world. The performance spread between dividend-paying stocks and non-dividend-paying stocks under the Fama-French framework. Two investment strategies to pick non-dividend-paying stocks. 1
4 OVERVIEW OF U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL NON-DIVIDEND PAYERS Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks Are More Common in the U.S. To distinguish established non-dividend-paying stocks from those that eliminate dividends possibly due to temporary financial conditions, we divide equity markets into the following four 1 mutually exclusive dividend categories based on companies previous and current calendar years dividend payments: dividend payers, dividend non-payers, dividend initiators and dividend eliminators. To qualify as dividend payers (or nonpayers), the dividend payments for both previous and current calendar year need to be non-zeros (or zeros). For the U.S. stock market, which is represented by the MSCI U.S. investable market universe 2, about 48% of the stocks are non-dividend-paying on average, as is shown in the chart below. For the international market, which is represented by the MSCI World ex. U.S. investable market universe, about only 18% of the stocks are non-dividend-paying on average. Namely, non-dividend-paying stocks are more common in the U.S. than in the international market. The top three contributing sectors for U.S. non-dividendpaying stocks historically are Information Technology, Health Care, and Consumer Discretionary, while the top three contributing sectors for international non-dividend-paying stocks are Industrials, Materials, and Financials. 1. This approach is different from NDR s SBOX_202_SP5 product, where dividend eliminators are considered non-payers and dividend initiators are considered dividend payers. 2. The MSCI investable market universe includes large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks U.S. vs International Non Dividend Payers and Top Contributing Sectors MSCI U.S. IMI and MSCI World ex U.S. IMI universes are used for U.S. and international stocks. The numbers in the labels correspond to the average counts of non-payers through out the history ( absolute counts and % of all dividend categories ). U.S. Non-Payers (1382, 48.2%) -- Information Technology Non-Payers (404, 13.9%) -- Health Care Non-Payers (261, 9.2%) -- Consumer Discretionary Non-Payers (256, 8.8%) World ex U.S. Non-Payers (833, 18.3%) -- Industrials Non-Payers (139, 2.9%) -- Financials Non-Payers (130, 2.8%) -- Materials Non-Payers (123, 2.8%) NSQ2016Q1_01 Source: MSCI 2
5 The Same Sector Can Have a Very Different Proportion of Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks The chart below expands from the top three contributing sectors mentioned above, and shows all ten sectors contribution to non-dividend-paying stocks in the U.S. and the international markets. NSQ2016Q1_02 It is true that the top contributing sectors for non-dividend-paying stocks in the U.S. and in the international market has something to do with sectors benchmark weights in the two markets. For example, as shown in the chart below, the Information Technology sector has a higher weight in the U.S. market, while the Industrials and Materials sectors have higher weights in the international market. This could lead to the Information Technology sector being the top non-dividendpayers' contributing sector for the U.S. and the Industrials and Materials sectors being the top dividend-payers' contributing sectors for the international market. However, the sector benchmark weights alone cannot explain why some sectors, such as Consumer Discretionary, which have similar weights in the U.S. and in the international market, do not have similar shares of non-dividend-paying stocks in the two markets. NSQ2016Q1_02 3
6 The chart below looks at non-dividend-paying stocks more closely, by comparing the percentage of stocks in each sector that are non-dividend-paying in the U.S. versus in the international market. Note that in the U.S., about 83% of the technology stocks are non-dividend-paying, while in the international market, only 25% of the technology stocks are. In the U.S., about 80% of the health care stocks are non-dividend-paying, while the number is only 28% in the international market. For the consumer discretionary stocks, about 55% of the stocks are non-dividendpaying in the U.S., while only 16% are non-dividend-paying in the international market. The same sectors can have a very different makeup of dividend-paying vs. non-dividend-paying stocks in different markets. This can also lead to different levels of sector contributions for non-dividend-paying stocks in different markets Monthly Data to % of Stocks in Each Sector That Are Non-Payers ( Historical Average ) MSCI U.S. IMI MSCI World ex U.S. IMI Note: MSCI IMI Universe includes small caps. Source: MSCI Energy Materials Industrials Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Health Care Financials Information Technology Telecommunic ation Services Utilities NSQ2016Q1_03 4
7 EXAMINING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIVIDEND PAYERS OVER NON- PAYERS Dividend Payers Have Outperformed Non-Payers Over the Long Run As shown in the charts at right and below, dividend payers have outperformed non-dividend payers in both the U.S. and the international ex. U.S. markets since 6/30/1994 3, in terms of both absolute and risk-adjusted returns. This is consistent with our U.S. strategy team s findings for the S&P 500 stocks (SBOX_202_SP5), where dividend payers have outperformed non-payers, dividend growers have outperformed dividend non-changers, and dividend non-changers have outperformed dividend cutters. 3. This is the earliest date of MSCI IMI universe in our database. 5,012 3,981 3,162 2,512 1,995 1,585 1, Returns of MSCI U.S. IMI Stocks by Dividend Policy Payers ( Gain/Annum: 12.1%, Std Dev Ann: 15.5%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.62, Turnover :27.9%, Avg # Stocks: 1347 ) ---- Growers ( Gain/Annum: 12.4%, Std Dev Ann: 13.7%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.72, Turnover :152.0%, Avg # Stocks: 501 ) ---- Non-Changers ( Gain/Annum: 11.5%, Std Dev Ann: 16.3%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.55, Turnover :137.4%, Avg # Stocks: 794 ) ---- Cutters ( Gain/Annum: 4.6%, Std Dev Ann: 21.8%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.09, Turnover :175.7%, Avg # Stocks: 52 ) Non-Payers ( Gain/Annum: 9.2%, Std Dev Ann: 25.1%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.27, Turnover :49.7%, Avg # Stocks: 1385 ) Initiators ( Gain/Annum: 7.8%, Std Dev Ann: 17.8%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.30, Turnover :221.7%, Avg # Stocks: 38 ) Eliminators ( Gain/Annum: -0.9%, Std Dev Ann: 36.2%, Sharpe Ratio: -0.09, Turnover :235.3%, Avg # Stocks: 18 ) Source: MSCI, S&P Capital IQ Compustat Monthly Data to (Log Scale) 5,012 Portfolios are Equal Weighted, Rebalanced Quarterly. Total Returns are in USD. The Major Dividend Categories Listed in the Chart are Mutually Exclusive. Dividend Payers Include Dividend Growers, Cutters and and Non-Changers. Dividend Growers are Stocks with Positive Change of IDC ( for International Stocks ) or Compustat ( for U.S. stocks ) Indicated Annual DPS from the Previous Year End ( in Local Currency ). 3,981 3,162 2,512 1,995 1,585 1, ,413 1,259 1, Returns of MSCI World ex U.S. IMI Stocks by Dividend Policy NSQ2016Q1_04 Payers ( Gain/Annum: 6.5%, Std Dev Ann: 16.2%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.24, Turnover :36.5%, Avg # Stocks: 3324 ) ---- Growers ( Gain/Annum: 8.7%, Std Dev Ann: 15.5%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.39, Turnover :147.3%, Avg # Stocks: 1209 ) ---- Non-Changers ( Gain/Annum: 4.3%, Std Dev Ann: 17.1%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.10, Turnover :155.7%, Avg # Stocks: 1745 ) ---- Cutters ( Gain/Annum: 3.9%, Std Dev Ann: 17.9%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.07, Turnover :172.3%, Avg # Stocks: 370 ) Non-Payers ( Gain/Annum: 1.9%, Std Dev Ann: 24.3%, Sharpe Ratio: -0.03, Turnover :75.8%, Avg # Stocks: 851 ) Initiators ( Gain/Annum: 4.5%, Std Dev Ann: 19.9%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.10, Turnover :202.2%, Avg # Stocks: 168 ) Eliminators ( Gain/Annum: 2.9%, Std Dev Ann: 25.2%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.02, Turnover :218.1%, Avg # Stocks: 74 ) Source: MSCI NSQ2016Q1_04 Monthly Data to (Log Scale) Portfolios are Equal Weighted, Rebalanced Quarterly. Total Returns are in USD. The Major Dividend Categories Listed in the Chart are Mutually Exclusive. Dividend Payers Include Dividend Growers, Cutters and and Non-Changers. Dividend Growers are Stocks with Positive Change of IDC ( for International Stocks ) or Compustat ( for U.S. stocks ) Indicated Annual DPS from the Previous Year End ( in Local Currency ) ,413 1,259 1,
8 The Relative Performance Varies in Different Periods The chart below provides a more detailed view of the relative performance of dividend payers versus non-payers in the U.S. and the international market. The green relative performance line represents the U.S. market, and it is a ratio of U.S. equal-weighted dividend payers total return index to the U.S. equal-weighted non-payers total return index, starting at 1:1. Over the long run, U.S. dividend payers have outperformed non-payers, as evidenced by the relative performance line rising from 1:1 to around 1.8:1. Most of the outperformance of U.S. dividend payers is concentrated between 1994 and After 2004, U.S. dividend payers exhibit relatively flat performance over the non-payers. The orange relative performance line represents the international market, and for the international market, most of the dividend payers outperformance is concentrated in recent years. For the periods 1994 to 2000 and 2002 to 2008, the international non-payers outperformed the international dividend payers. 2.7 Monthly Data to Dividend Payers vs Non-Payers Relative Performance MSCI U.S. IMI Dividend Payers / Non-Payers MSCI World ex U.S. IMI Dividend Payers / Non-Payers Relative performance is measured by the dividend payers total return index divided by non-payers total return index (in USD). Start at 1: Source: MSCI NSQ2016Q1_05 6
9 Explaining the Outperformance Under the Fama-French Framework Dividend payers tend to have lower beta, larger market cap, and cheaper valuations than non-payers. When taking these dividend payers' features away, the excess returns of U.S. dividend -paying stocks over non-payers may no longer look significant. The tables below use the Fama-French three-factor model to examine the statistical significance of the monthly excess returns of dividend payers over non-payers. Monthly returns of the MSCI IMI growth index 4 over the MSCI IMI value index are used to represent the growth minus value factor, and monthly returns of the MSCI small cap index over the MSCI large cap index are used to represent the small cap minus large cap factor. The negative coefficient estimates for the "MSCI IMI", "Small Cap Minus Large Cap" and "Growth Minus Value" factors indicate that dividend payers in general have lower beta, larger market cap, and cheaper valuation than non-payers. The zero p-values of those estimates indicate that those dividend payers' features are not negligible. The coefficient estimate of the intercept represents monthly excess returns of dividend payers over non-payers. For the period to 2016, the estimate of the excess returns of dividend payers over non-payers in the U.S. market is positive; however, it has a p-value of 0.219, which is greater than 0.1, indicating the excess returns of the dividend payers versus non-payers are not very different from zero. In the international market, the estimate of the excess returns of dividend payers has a p-value of 0, meaning the excess returns are considered different from zero and statistically significant in the international market, even after taking the beta, market cap, and valuation factors into account. 4. All indices are total return indices in USD. 5. MSCI small cap indices start in 2001 in our database. REGRESSION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Coefficient Estimate Std. Error T-Value P-Value intercept MSCI U.S. IMI Small Cap Minus Large Cap Growth Minus Value Ned Davis Research Group T_NSQ201603XX1.1 REGRESSION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Coefficient Estimate Std. Error T-Value P-Value intercept MSCI World ex U.S. IMI Small Cap Minus Large Cap Growth Minus Value Ned Davis Research Group T_NSQ201603XX1.2 7
10 The chart below illustrates the statistical significance of excess returns of dividend payers over non-payers in detail, using three-year rolling regressions instead of a single regression for the period from 2001 to The green dots represent the excess returns of dividend payers over non-payers from the rolling three-year regressions ending on 12/31 each year for the U.S. market, and the orange dots represent the excess returns for the international market. Statistically insignificant excess returns are grayed out in the chart. For the U.S. markets, almost all excess returns throughout different rolling three-year timeframes in history are not statistically significant, after removing the three key features of dividend-paying stocks. However, for the international markets, the dividend payers excess returns in recent years are statistically significant. Monthly Excess Returns of Dividend Payers Over Non-Payers Monthly Data Monthly Excess Returns (%) Note: Fama-French three factor model is used to calculate monthly excess returns on a rolling 3-year basis ending on 12/31 each year. Excess returns with p values greater than 0.10 are considered statistically insignificant, and are grayed out. MSCI World ex U.S. IMI MSCI U.S. IMI Year Source: MSCI NSQ2016Q1_07 8
11 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES FOR U.S. NON-PAYERS Given non-dividend paying stocks are more common in the U.S. than in the international market, and there is strong evidence showing that non-payers are not necessarily inferior to dividend payers in the U.S. market purely because they are not paying any dividends, we will be focusing on developing investment strategies for U.S. non-payers in this publication. Strategy A: Mimicking Dividend Payers If one is happy with the performance of dividend-paying stocks, but the concern is paying tax on dividends, then why not create a non-dividend-paying portfolio mimicking similar features of the dividend-paying stocks? MSCI U.S. IMI Non Payers Strategy A As mentioned in the analysis above, dividend payers tend to have lower beta, larger market cap, and cheaper valuations than non-payers. By creating a scoring system that ranks nonpayers based on these three features, one may be able to pick a basket of non-payers that resembles dividend payers. The chart below shows a strategy that uses such a scoring system. The best tile (tile 5 in the chart) represents the strategy, namely the basket of non-dividend-paying stocks that match the three features of dividend payers most closely. The performance of this strategy has been quite impressive, with 14.3% gain per annum and 0.67 Sharpe ratio from 1994 to Monthly Data to (Log Scale) 5,623 3,162 1, Quintile Portfolio Gain/Annum Std Dev Ann Sharpe Ratio Turnover Avg # Stocks 1 0.9% 38.6% % % 28.9% % % 22.7% % % 19.5% % % 17.5% % 231 Shaded areas represent NDR defined bear markets. Portfolios are Equal Weighted, Rebalanced Quarterly. Total Returns are in USD. The strategy is based on the overall scores of the following factors: 3-Year Rolling Market Beta ( Small Values = Low Scores ), Market Capitalization ( Large Values = High Scores ), EBITDA to EV ( Large Values = High Scores ). 5,623 3,162 1, ,778 Strategy A Best / Worst Quintile ( the Higher the Quintile Number, the Higher the Values, the Better ) 1,778 Source: MSCI NSQ2016Q1_08 9
12 Strategy B: Investing in Companies That Have Justifiable Reasons to Not Pay Dividends Another approach is to think about when it makes sense for a company not to pay a dividend, and then invest in these types of companies. When does it make sense for a company not to pay a dividend? One answer: when a company is very profitable and has great growth opportunities, it makes sense for it to plowback more to the business than distributing earnings to the shareholders. In this strategy, we use return on equity (ROE) to represent companies profitability, and the past three years earnings per share (EPS) growth trend 6 to gauge if companies have good growth opportunities. In addition, we would like to avoid companies with high accrual ratios and avoid glamourous companies with very high growth anticipation 7 from The Street. As shown in the chart below, this strategy (tile 5) has also shown impressive performance for the period 1994 to 2016, and the spread between the best and worst tile is even more consistent throughout the history than the first strategy. 6. Measured by rolling three-year z-score of trailing twelve months earnings per share. 7. Measured by estimated year-over-year sales per share growth. 10,000 5,623 3,162 1, MSCI U.S. IMI Non Payers Strategy B Quintile Portfolio Gain/Annum Std Dev Ann Sharpe Ratio Turnover Avg # Stocks 1-6.4% 33.5% % % 26.7% % % 23.7% % % 22.1% % % 21.1% % 203 Monthly Data to (Log Scale) 10,000 5,623 3,162 1, Shaded areas represent NDR defined bear markets. Portfolios are Equal Weighted, Rebalanced Quarterly. Total Returns are in USD. The strategy is based on the overall scores of the following factors: Return on Equity ( Large Values = High Scores ), 3-Year EPS Growth ( Large Values = High Scores ), Estimated Year over Year SPS Growth ( Small Values = Low Scores ), Accruals Ratio ( Small Values = Low Scores ) ,000 5,623 3,162 1, NSQ2016Q1_8 Strategy B Best / Worst Quintile ( the Higher the Quintile Number, the Higher the Values, the Better ) Source: MSCI ,000 5,623 3,162 1,
13 One explanation of the consistent spread between the best and the worst tile is that the factors used in this strategy have relative low correlation to each other, and some factors undesirable performance in certain years can be compensated by other factors desirable performance in those years. The chart below shows each factor s performance year by year, measured by the total returns of the factor s best tile minus the worst tile. In general, green means a factor performed well in a year, while red means vice versa. It is hard to find a year during which all the factors had undesirable performance in any year from to 2015, and each factor seems to have its own good versus bad performance pattern. Using traditional correlation analysis for the full history, as shown in the table below, the correlations among the four factors are quite low, ranging from to is the earliest year when all the factors have performance stats. The accruals factor starts in 1998, the estimated year-over-year sales per share growth factor starts in 1996, the return on equity factor starts in 1994, and the threeyear earnings per share factor starts in NSQ2016Q1_9 MSCI U.S. IMI NON PAYERS QUANT FACTORS CORRELATION (06/30/ /29/2016) Return on Equity 3-Year EPS Growth Estimated Year over Year SPS Growth Accruals Ratio Return on Equity Year EPS Growth Estimated Year over Year SPS Growth Accruals Ratio Copyright 2016 Ned Davis Research Group. Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. All rights reserved. See NDR disclaimer at For data vendor disclaimers refer to Ned Davis Research Group T_NSQ201603XX1.1 11
14 COMPARING THE U.S. NON-PAYERS' STRATEGIES The above section shows the performance of the two nonpayers' strategies on their own. In this section, we will compare the two strategies performance with the broad U.S. market and with the dividend payers portfolio, and analyze the strength and weakness of those strategies. Both Strategies Have Outperformed the U.S. Market The charts below show the two non-dividend-paying strategies and the dividend payers portfolio s performance relative to the broad U.S. market. For comparison purpose, the performance is calculated from equal-weighted, quarterly rebalanced, total return indices. From 1994 to 2016, both of the non-payer strategies have outperformed the customized U.S. market benchmark, in terms of both absolute and risk-adjusted returns. The two strategies have also outperformed the dividend payers portfolio in terms of the absolute returns, and achieved comparable risk-adjusted returns. Note that the relative performance line for Strategy A, which tries to resemble the dividend payers portfolio, and the relative performance line for the dividend payers portfolio look correlated, while the relative performance line for Strategy B looks quite different. This confirms that Strategy B is quite different from Strategy A, and Strategy A succeeds in mimicking the dividend payers portfolio to a certain degree. Relative Performance Against MSCI U.S. IMI Equal-Weighted Total Return Index Monthly Data to (Log Scale) MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy A Equal-Weighted Total Return MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy B Equal-Weighted Total Return MSCI U.S. IMI Payers Equal-Weighted Total Return Source: MSCI Name Gain/Annum Ann Std Dev Downside Dev Sharpe Ratio Max Drawdown (%) MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy A Equal-Weighted Total Return 14.3% 17.5% 11.2% % MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy B Equal-Weighted Total Return 13.7% 21.1% 12.9% % MSCI U.S. IMI Payers Equal-Weighted Total Return 12.1% 15.5% 10.2% % MSCI U.S. IMI Equal-Weighted Total Return 10.8% 19.8% 12.9% % NSQ2016Q1_11 12
15 Both Strategies Exhibit Robust Performance Across Most Regimes The historical period from 6/30/1994 to 2/29/2016 can be broken down into four different pairs of regimes: equity bull market and equity bear market, commodity bull market and commodity bear market, high volatility market and low volatility market 9, and rising real interest rates 10 market and falling real interest rates market. MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy A Equal-Weighted Total Return MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy B Equal-Weighted Total Return MSCI U.S. IMI Payers Equal-Weighted Total Return Source: MSCI The chart on the top right shows the two non-dividend paying strategies' excess gain per annum over the U.S. market in different regimes, and the chart on the bottom right shows the excess gain per annum of the dividend payers portfolio over the U.S. market. Both of the non-dividend-paying strategies have outperformed the U.S. market in most of the regimes, except that Strategy B has underperformed the U.S. market by about -1.2% per annum in the commodity bear market. The shapes of the two strategies look quite different: Strategy B has performed better than Strategy A in equity bull market, commodity bull market, and high volatility market; while Strategy A has performed better than Strategy B in equity bear market, commodity bear market, and low volatility market. NSQ2016Q1_12 The dividend payers portfolio has a more similar shape to Strategy A, except that it has performed better in the falling real interest rates market than in the rising real interest rates market, indicating one aspect of the dividend payers portfolio that Strategy A may not be able to fully replicate. Unlike the two non-dividend-paying strategies, the dividend payers portfolio has underperformed the U.S. market in equity bull markets by about -3.6% per annum and in rising real interest rates environment by about -0.9% per annum. 9. VIX index is used to define high versus low volatility market. The historical average of the VIX index during the 6/30/1994 to 2/29/2016 period is When the VIX index is higher than 21.2, the market is considered a high volatility market. Vice versa, for the low volatility market. 10. Note that the real interest rates are used here instead of the nominal interest rates. The nominal yields of 10- year U.S. treasuries minus the U.S. inflation rate is used to represent the real interest rates. NSQ2016Q1_12 13
16 Both Strategies Have Slightly Better Risk Profiles Than the U.S. Market For the period from 6/30/1994 to 2/29/2016, the chart on the top right shows the maximum drawdowns of the two non-dividend-paying strategies minus the maximum drawdown of the U.S. market in the following regimes: equity bear market, commodity bear market, and high volatility market. A positive number indicates the maximum drawdown is smaller than that of the U.S. market, which is considered desirable. As shown in the chart, the two non-dividend-paying strategies display less maximum drawdown than the U.S. market in equity bear market and the high volatility market. However, their maximum drawdowns are slightly higher, though not significantly higher, than the U.S. market in commodity bear market: Strategy A experienced 0.3% more drawdowns, and Strategy B experienced 1.5% more drawdowns in commodity bear market. Source: NSQ2016Q1_12 MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy A Equal-Weighted Total Return MSCI U.S. IMI Non-Payers Strategy B Equal-Weighted Total Return MSCI U.S. IMI Payers Equal-Weighted Total Return In general, Strategy A displays a slightly better risk profile than Strategy B, and has slightly fewer drawdowns than Strategy B in all of the three regimes. As for the dividend-paying portfolio shown in the chart on the bottom right, it exhibits a less impressive risk profile in high volatility market, but shows a better risk profile in the commodity bear market than the two non-dividend-paying strategies. NSQ2016Q1_12 14
17 Holdings Comparison Last but not least, one may be interested in seeing those strategies sector exposure. Sector exposure analysis on portfolios holdings is a good and a common tool to use; however, the true nature of the portfolios may elude this type of analysis. The chart below shows the sector weights of the current holdings of the two equal-weighted non-dividend-paying strategies' holdings, alongside those of the equal-weighted dividend payers portfolio. Though the two non-dividend-paying strategies are quite different in nature, the sector breakdown of the strategies are more similar to each other: Technology, Health Care, and Consumer Discretionary sectors have higher weights in the two strategies holdings. For the dividend-paying portfolio, even though it shared a lot of common features with Strategy A, its sector exposure is quite different. Financials, Materials, and Industrials sectors have higher weights in the dividend payers portfolio s holdings. NSQ2016Q1_13 CONCLUSION In summary, unlike dividend-paying stocks, non-dividend-paying stocks are more tax efficient for investors with taxable accounts. Investment strategies can be developed to enhance non-dividend-paying stocks performance and reach a comparable or even better returns than the dividend-paying stocks. It is also possible to develop a strategy that resembles key features of the dividend-paying stocks. For more information or requests for further research, please contact our custom research team at NDRSolutionsPub@ndr.com 15
18 WENJIA ( LUCY ) LIU, CFA Senior Research Analyst Wenjia ( Lucy ) Liu, CFA, Senior Research Analyst, is a member of the Custom Research Solutions group. She specializes in global markets, asset allocation, and investment strategy research, and was the lead developer of the ETF Asset Allocation Model. Lucy joined NDRG in Prior to joining NDRG, Lucy worked at Boston Common Asset Management, where she conducted fundamental research on international stocks. Before coming to the U.S., she worked as an analyst for American International Assurance Company, where she conducted analysis for the bancassurance division and provided training for salespeople. Lucy earned her Master of Business Administration degree with a focus in finance from Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business, in She received her dual bachelor degrees in Law and Economics from Peking University. Lucy is a CFA charterholder and is a member of the CFA Institute. STEPHANIE O BRIEN Research Analyst Stephanie O Brien, Research Analyst, Custom Research Solutions, performs a variety of research projects for NDRG clients. Stephanie joined the firm in 2008 and previously worked for Ned Davis, the firm s President and Senior Investment Strategist, developing indicators, models, and studies, as well as building and maintaining charts and reports. Stephanie graduated cum laude from the University of South Florida with a Bachelor of Science in Economics. 16
19 NED DAVIS RESEARCH GROUP (800) VENICE 600 Bird Bay Drive West Venice, FL (941) BOSTON 50 Federal Street 6 th Floor Boston, MA (617) ATLANTA 400 Northridge Road Suite 515 Atlanta, GA (678) SAN FRANCISCO 50 California Street Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA (415) LONDON 8 Bouverie Street London EC4Y 8AX +44 (0) NDRG EDITORIAL BOARD Ned Davis Senior Investment Strategist Tim Hayes, CMT Chief Global Investment Strategist Joseph Kalish Chief Global Macro Strategist DISCLAIMER Ed Clissold, CFA Chief U.S. Strategist Brian Sanborn, CFA Director of Research Applications The data and analysis contained herein are provided as is and without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Ned Davis Research, Inc. (NDR), d.b.a. Ned Davis Research Group (NDRG), any NDRG affiliates or employees, or any third-party data provider, shall not have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information contained in any NDRG publication. NDRG disclaims any and all express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability, suitability or fitness for a particular purpose or use. NDRG s past recommendations and model results are not a guarantee of future results. This communication reflects our analysts opinions as of the date of this communication and will not necessarily be updated as views or information change. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. NDRG or its affiliated companies or their respective shareholders, directors, officers and/or employees, may have long or short positions in the securities discussed herein and may purchase or sell such securities without notice. Using any graph, chart, formula or other device to assist in deciding which securities to trade or when to trade them presents many difficulties and their effectiveness has significant limitations, including that prior patterns may not repeat themselves continuously or on any particular occasion. In addition, market participants using such devices can impact the market in a way that changes the effectiveness of such device. Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. For data vendor disclaimers, refer to Copyright 2016 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Generate alpha. Identify risk. Choose Ned Davis Research. Founded in 1980, Ned Davis Research Group is a leading independent research firm with clients around the globe. With a range of products and services utilizing a 360 methodology, we deliver awardwinning solutions to the world s leading investment management companies. Our clients include professionals from global investment firms, banks, insurance companies, mutual funds, hedge funds, pension and endowment funds, and registered investment advisors. Macro Fundamental Idea Technical Sentiment 360 APPROACH
Equity Rating and Report
NDRG GUIDE TO Equity Rating and Report Ned Davis Research Group Generate Alpha. Identify risk. Choose Ned Davis Research. TABLE OF CONTENTS NDRG Equity Focus Ranks...1 Universe...1 Rating a Stock Based
More informationExchange Traded Service
NDRG GUIDE TO Exchange Traded Service Ned Davis Research Group Generate Alpha. Identify risk. Choose Ned Davis Research. NED DAVIS RESEARCH GROUP (NDRG) PHILOSOPHY: The development of NDRG s ETF service,
More informationSmall-Cap Investing: Discover the Growth Potential
Small-Cap Investing: Discover the Growth Potential Presented by: Brian C. Fitzsimons, CFA Partner Portfolio Manager, Analyst - WTSGX May 13, 2015 For institutional use only. Small-Cap Investing 0 Speaker
More informationAn Economic Perspective on Dividends
2017 An Economic Perspective on Dividends Table of Contents Corporate Outlook... 1 2 Market Environment... 3 7 Payout Ratio... 8 9 Long-term View...10 12 Global View... 13 16 Active Management... 17 Risk
More informationMid Cap Dividend Growth Strategy
Mid Cap Dividend Growth Strategy Product Level Investment Process Stock Universe Companies that have increased their dividends with market capitalizations of $1 billion to $15 billion Stock Selection Top
More informationRadius Build Better Portfolios BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund Portfolio Manager: Larry Berman, ETF Capital Management
Radius Build Better Portfolios BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund Portfolio Manager: Larry Berman, ETF Capital Management About The Manager Firm Profile ETF Capital Management (ETFCM) was founded in 2006 by
More informationLMCG Global Market Neutral Strategy A Brief History
LMCG Global Market Neutral Strategy A Brief History Jeffrey P. Davis, CFA Chief Investment Officer INTRODUCTION: WHY GLOBAL MARKET NEUTRAL? Jeffrey P. Davis, CFA Chief Investment Officer Market Neutral
More informationPERFORMANCE STUDY 2013
US EQUITY FUNDS PERFORMANCE STUDY 2013 US EQUITY FUNDS PERFORMANCE STUDY 2013 Introduction This article examines the performance characteristics of over 600 US equity funds during 2013. It is based on
More informationGyroscope Capital Management Group
Thursday, March 08, 2018 Quarterly Review and Commentary Earlier this year, we highlighted the rising popularity of quant strategies among asset managers. In our most recent commentary, we discussed factor
More informationEM Country Rotation Based On A Stock Factor Model
EM Country Rotation Based On A Stock Factor Model May 17, 2018 by Jun Zhu of The Leuthold Group This study is part of our efforts to test the feasibility of building an Emerging Market (EM) country rotation
More informationHow to Assess Real Exchange Rate Overvaluation
JANUARY 2018 INTERNATIONAL EQUITY WHITEPAPER How to Assess Real Exchange Rate Overvaluation Leila Heckman, Ph.D., Founder John Mullin, Ph.D., Chief Strategist For More Information (917) 386-6261 www.heckmanglobal.com
More informationNasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index
Nasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index A Multi-Factor Approach to Small Cap Introduction Multi-factor investing has become very popular in recent years. The term smart beta has been coined to categorize
More informationQUARTERLY MARKET OUTLOOK THIRD QUARTER CLS-7/11/2017
QUARTERLY MARKET OUTLOOK THIRD QUARTER 2017 Contents How did the markets perform? How did CLS portfolios perform? What is CLS thinking moving forward? What is CLS doing with portfolios? CLS Investment
More informationA Case for Dividend Growth Strategies
RESEARCH Strategy CONTRIBUTORS Tianyin Cheng Director Strategy & ESG Indices tianyin.cheng@spglobal.com Vinit Srivastava Managing Director Strategy & ESG Indices vinit.srivastava@spglobal.com An allocation
More informationFactor Analysis: What Drives Performance?
Factor Analysis: What Drives Performance? February 2014 E. William Stone, CFA CMT Managing Director, Investment & Portfolio Strategy Chief Investment Strategist Chen He Portfolio Strategist Paul J. White,
More informationMarket Insights. The Benefits of Integrating Fundamental and Quantitative Research to Deliver Outcome-Oriented Equity Solutions.
Market Insights The Benefits of Integrating Fundamental and Quantitative Research to Deliver Outcome-Oriented Equity Solutions Vincent Costa, CFA Head of Global Equities Peg DiOrio, CFA Head of Global
More informationAdverse Active Alpha SM Manager Ranking Model
CONSULTING GROUP INVESTMENT ADVISOR RESEARCH DECEMBER 3, 2013 Adverse Active Alpha SM Manager Ranking Model MATTHEW RIZZO Vice President Matthew.Rizzo@ms.com +1 302 888-4105 Introduction Investment professionals
More informationTHE CASE FOR RISING DIVIDENDS
WASHINGTON CROSSING ADVISORS THE CASE FOR RISING DIVIDENDS Growth in Value by Behavior t Growers: $7,499 t Payers: $5,227 t S&P 500: $2,741 t No Change: $2,285 $100 Starting Value (1972) t Non-Payers:
More informationFactor Investing & Smart Beta
Factor Investing & Smart Beta Raina Oberoi VP, Index Applied Research MSCI 1 Outline What is Factor Investing? Minimum Volatility Index Methodology Historical Performance and Index Characteristics Risk
More informationWhy Global Dividend Growth?
Why Global Growth? Market Commentary 2018 WHEN INVESTORS ARE LOOKING FOR YIELD, many may consider dividend-paying equities. s offer a potentially consistent form of return and may help buffer risk during
More informationWhy Dividends? Market Commentary January 2018
Why Dividends? Market Commentary January 2018 OVER THE YEARS, INVESTOR APPETITE FOR DIVIDENDS has waxed and waned. Historically, research in dividend investing has measured everything from performance
More informationINSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT & FIDUCIARY SERVICES: Investment Basics: Is Active Management Still Worth the Fees? By Joseph N. Stevens, CFA INTRODUCTION
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT & FIDUCIARY SERVICES: Investment Basics: Is Active Management Still Worth the Fees? By Joseph N. Stevens, CFA INTRODUCTION As of December 31, 2014, more than 30% of all US Dollar-based
More informationMSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTIPLE-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY
INDEX METHODOLOGY MSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTIPLE-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY June 2017 JUNE 2017 CONTENTS 1 Introduction...3 2 Index Construction Methodology...4 2.1 Applicable Universe...4 2.2 Constituent Identification...4
More informationDisclaimer. Investment Suitability is important.
Investment Management for Accredited Investors December, 2013 Disclaimer Investment Suitability is important. This presentation was prepared p for an audience of investment professionals and is for educational
More informationManaged Accounts Available at Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Investment Strategy: U.S. Trust Focused Large Cap Growth Investment Style: Large Cap Growth
Managed Accounts Available at Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Investment Strategy: U.S. Trust Investment Style: Large Cap Growth All information as of December 31, 2006 The management team seeks outstanding
More informationReturns on Small Cap Growth Stocks, or the Lack Thereof: What Risk Factor Exposures Can Tell Us
RESEARCH Returns on Small Cap Growth Stocks, or the Lack Thereof: What Risk Factor Exposures Can Tell Us The small cap growth space has been noted for its underperformance relative to other investment
More informationMULTI-FACTOR INDEXES MADE SIMPLE
MULTI-FACTOR INDEXES MADE SIMPLE A REVIEW OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC APPROACHES Multi-factor index fund allocations are increasingly becoming the preferred approach to factor investing. In this paper, we examine
More informationAI: Weighted Sector Strategy DEC
KEN STERN & ASSOCIATES DEC 31 2016 1 Tactical Rebalanced AI: Strategy DEC 31 2016 Ken Stern & Associates Strategy seeks to track the investment results of the Morgan Stanley Capital International USA Investable
More informationQ Global Equity. (888)
Q4 2017 Global Equity www.westendadvisors.com info@westendadvisors.com (888) 500-9025 1 WestEnd Advisors Overview The cornerstone of our investment process is that the macroeconomic environment is a key
More informationHARNESSING THE POWER OF FACTOR MODELS
HARNESSING THE POWER OF FACTOR MODELS Enabling an Integrated View of Risk and Return Jean-Maurice Ladure, CFA Head of Equity Applied Research in EMEA, MSCI October 2017 2015 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved.
More informationMSCI LOW SIZE INDEXES
MSCI LOW SIZE INDEXES msci.com Size-based investing has been an integral part of the investment process for decades. More recently, transparent and rules-based factor indexes have become widely used tools
More informationMorgan Stanley Target Equity Balanced Index
Morgan Stanley Target Equity Balanced Index Targeting Equity and Bond Allocation in a Balanced Way The Target Equity Balanced Index (the TEBI Index ) invests dynamically between Equities and Bonds in order
More informationQ Global Equity. (888)
Q1 2018 Global Equity www.westendadvisors.com info@westendadvisors.com (888) 500-9025 1 WestEnd Advisors Overview The cornerstone of our investment process is that the macroeconomic environment is a key
More informationWhy Active Now in U.S. Large-Cap Equity
LEADERSHIP SERIES Why Active Now in U.S. Large-Cap Equity With changing economic and market conditions, the time may be right for actively managed U.S. large-cap funds to take the lead. Darby Nielson,
More informationIndependent Study Project
Independent Study Project A Market-Neutral Strategy Lewis Kaufman, CFA Fuqua School of Business, 03 lewis.kaufman@alumni.duke.edu Faculty Advisor: Campbell R. Harvey May 1, 2003 1 Agenda Annual Returns
More informationMSCI CUSTOM RISK WEIGHTED INDEXES
INVESTOR INSIGHT MSCI RISK WEIGHTED INDEXES MSCI CUSTOM RISK WEIGHTED INDEXES An Approach to Combining Low Risk and Size Exposure Index Marketing December 2016 DECEMBER 2016 The MSCI Risk Weighted Indexes
More informationDeath, Taxes and Short-Term Underperformance: Emerging Market Funds
Death, Taxes and Short-Term Underperformance: Emerging Market Funds In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. 1 Benjamin Franklin March 2018 Since the Brandes Institute first
More informationFactor Performance in Emerging Markets
Investment Research Factor Performance in Emerging Markets Taras Ivanenko, CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Alex Lai, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Factors can be defined
More informationLazard Insights. Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta. Summary. What Is Smart Beta? Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst
Lazard Insights Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Summary Smart beta strategies have become increasingly popular over the past several
More informationGLOBAL STRATEGY AND OUTLOOK WITH 11 QUESTIONS FOR '11
Ned Davis Research Group GLOBAL STRATEGY AND OUTLOOK WITH 11 QUESTIONS FOR '11 Kathrein & Co. Private Bankers Lunch January 11 Tim Hayes, CMT, Chief Investment Strategist CURRENT POSITIONS AND OUTLOOK
More informationMid Cap: A Sweet Spot for Performance
EDUCATION Equity 101 CONTRIBUTORS Fei Mei Chan Director Index Investment Strategy feimei.chan@spglobal.com Craig Lazzara, CFA Managing Director Global Head of Index Investment Strategy craig.lazzara@spglobal.com
More informationQ Global Equity. (888)
Q4 2018 Global Equity www.westendadvisors.com info@westendadvisors.com (888) 500-9025 1 WestEnd Advisors Overview The cornerstone of our investment process is that the macroeconomic environment is a key
More informationPrincipal Consultant
FRONTIER Principal Consultant- Head of Debt, Alternatives and Innovation Justine O Connell joined Frontier as an Associate in 2005 before relocating to London in 2008 where she worked for Watson Wyatt
More informationAuthored by: John C. Bailer, CFA, Joseph R. Duffy & W. Charles Cook, CFA. October 2016
October 2016 Caution: Playing It Safe Poses Hidden Dangers Authored by: John C. Bailer, CFA, Joseph R. Duffy & W. Charles Cook, CFA Against a backdrop of elevated investor anxiety, defensive and high dividend
More informationNDR 360 Model Linking Quant Technical and Fundamental Data
NDR 360 Model Linking Quant Technical and Fundamental Data MTA Presentation BRIAN SANBORN, CFA Global Quantitative Equity Strategist Ned Davis Research Group April 2014 Generate Alpha. Identify Risk. Choose
More informationAlternative Data Integration, Analysis and Investment Research
Alternative Data Integration, Analysis and Investment Research Yin Luo, CFA Vice Chairman Quantitative Research, Economics, and Portfolio Strategy QES Desk Phone: 1.646.582.9230 Luo.QES@wolferesearch.com
More informationWhat Do We Know About Rapid Increases in Risk?
Global Market Report What Do We Know About Increases in Risk? Rachael Smith and Oleg Ruban Implied Volatility as a Gauge of Sentiment Following a benign first quarter of 2012, recent weeks were characterized
More informationFourth Quarter Update: What s Next for Portfolio Allocations
Fourth Quarter Update: What s Next for Portfolio Allocations Please see important disclosures, chart explanations, Agenda Q3 Performance Review Review of move to benchmark weight in asset categories Trade,
More informationFranklin U.S. Rising Dividends Fund DIVIDENDS AN INDICATOR OF GROWTH
Franklin U.S. Rising Dividends Fund DIVIDENDS AN INDICATOR OF GROWTH The Strategy A Disciplined Approach to Stock Selection Franklin U.S. Rising Dividends Fund invests in high-quality, U.S. companies with
More informationFOR 2018 GLOBAL MARKET OUTLOOK PRESS BRIEFING. PROVIDED TO DESIGNATED MEMBERS OF THE PRESS ONLY, NOT FOR FURTHER DISTRIBUTION.
2018 Global Market Outlook Press Briefing U.S. EQUITIES Ann M. Holcomb, CFA Portfolio Manager November 14, 2017 FOR 2018 GLOBAL MARKET OUTLOOK PRESS BRIEFING. PROVIDED TO DESIGNATED MEMBERS OF THE PRESS
More informationInvestment Insight. Are Risk Parity Managers Risk Parity (Continued) Summary Results of the Style Analysis
Investment Insight Are Risk Parity Managers Risk Parity (Continued) Edward Qian, PhD, CFA PanAgora Asset Management October 2013 In the November 2012 Investment Insight 1, I presented a style analysis
More informationGROESBECK Investment Management Corporation. Groesbeck Investment Management Corp. 12 Route 17 North, Paramus, New Jersey
Groesbeck Investment Management Corp. 12 Route 17 North, Paramus, New Jersey 07652 201-291-7888 We seek to achieve four objectives: A superior dividend yield A rapid growth of the income stream A total
More informationThe Compelling Case for Value
The Compelling Case for Value July 2, 2018 SOLELY FOR THE USE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND PROFESSIONAL ADVISORS 0 Jan-75 Jan-77 Jan-79 Jan-81 Jan-83 Jan-85 Jan-87 Jan-89 Jan-91 Jan-93 Jan-95 Jan-97
More informationSmart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing
Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing September 2016 Donald J. Hohman Managing Director, Product Management Hitesh C. Patel, Ph.D Managing Director Structured Equity Douglas J. Roman,
More informationAn Analysis of Risk and Return in Fossil Fuel Free Investing
An Analysis of Risk and Return in Fossil Fuel Free Investing Boston Carbon Risk Forum Cambridge, MA September 29, 2014 Leading Brands Worldwide MSCI products include the MSCI Global Equity Indexes, MSCI
More informationLazard Insights. Growth: An Underappreciated Factor. What Is an Investment Factor? Summary. Does the Growth Factor Matter?
Lazard Insights : An Underappreciated Factor Jason Williams, CFA, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Summary Quantitative investment managers commonly employ value, sentiment, quality, and low risk factors to capture
More informationGROESBECK Investment Management Corporation. Groesbeck Investment Management Corp. 12 Route 17 North, Paramus, New Jersey
Groesbeck Investment Management Corp. 12 Route 17 North, Paramus, New Jersey 07652 201-291-7888 Growth of Income Investment Philosophy We seek to achieve four objectives: A superior dividend yield A rapid
More informationBNP PARIBAS MULTI ASSET DIVERSIFIED 5 INDEX
BNP PARIBAS MULTI ASSET DIVERSIFIED 5 INDEX Please refer to http://madindex.bnpparibas.com For more information regarding the index 20477 (12/17) Introducing the BNP Paribas Multi Asset Diversified (MAD)
More informationThe State of the Hedge Fund Industry
INSIGHTS The State of the Hedge Fund Industry September 2017 203.621.1700 2017, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hedge fund strategies have faced increased scrutiny post-financial crisis
More informationMSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTI-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY
INDEX METHODOLOGY MSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTI-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY April 2015 APRIL 2015 CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 3 2 Index Construction Methodology... 4 2.1 Applicable Universe... 4 2.2 Constituent
More informationCONSENSUS OPERATING EARNINGS for the S&P 500, MidCap 400 and SmallCap 600 Indices, as well as the Sectors in the S&P /02/18
CONSENSUS OPERATING EARNINGS for the S&P 500, MidCap 400 and SmallCap 600 Indices, as well as the Sectors in the S&P 500. 02/02/18 Operating EPS Y/Y % chgs. S&P 500 Sector Q1 Q2 2017 Q3 Q4E Year Q1E Q2E
More informationActive management headwinds:
QUANTITATIVE DESK STRATEGIES Active management headwinds: correlation and fund flows, quant vs. fundamental 1 October 211 Quantitative strategists Joseph J. Mezrich joseph.mezrich@nomura.com 1-212-667-9316
More informationThe Case for Growth. Investment Research
Investment Research The Case for Growth Lazard Quantitative Equity Team Companies that generate meaningful earnings growth through their product mix and focus, business strategies, market opportunity,
More informationIn this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. 1 Benjamin Franklin
December 2017 Death, Taxes and Short-Term Underperformance: International Funds In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. 1 Benjamin Franklin Since the Brandes Institute
More informationFuture. dividend growth. leaders
This whitepaper details the power of investing in the future dividend growth leaders, their potential to outperform the market, and how investors can take advantage Future dividend growth leaders Accessing
More informationFundamentally weighted index strategies: A primer on asset allocation in three core asset classes
strategies: A primer on asset allocation in three core asset classes 1 2 3 Key takeaways strategies can serve as a complement to traditional cap-weighted index strategies. Combining fundamentally weighted
More informationDividends: A Timeless Component of Equity Return
Dividends: A Timeless Component of Equity Return May 15, 2012 by Loomis Sayles & Company, L.P. With interest rates at historic lows and many dividend-paying stocks boasting yields comparable to or higher
More informationPennsylvania Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems
Stability Investment Solutions Diligence Pennsylvania Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems Linda Bakhshian, CPA Federated Investors Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania 12-44136
More informationComparative Profile. Style Map. Managed Account Select
Comparative Profile Managed Account Select Quarterly Highlights The S&P 500 Index was virtually flat in the second quarter, gaining 0.10% as concerns about the end of the Federal Reserve s QE2 program,
More informationSmart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing
Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing September 2017 Donald J. Hohman Managing Director, Product Management Hitesh C. Patel, Ph.D Managing Director Structured Equity Douglas J. Roman,
More informationMSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTIPLE-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY
INDEX METHODOLOGY MSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTIPLE-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY February 2019 FEBRUARY 2019 CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 3 2 Index Construction Methodology... 4 2.1 Applicable Universe... 4 2.2 Constituent
More informationDiversified Stock Income Plan
Joseph E. Buffa, Equity Sector Analyst Michael A. Colón, Equity Sector Analyst Diversified Stock Income Plan 2017 Concept Review The Diversified Stock Income Plan (DSIP List) focuses on companies that
More informationDIVIDENDS A NEW PERSPECTIVE
July 2015 DIVIDENDS A NEW PERSPECTIVE Richard Cloutier, Jr., CFA Vice President Chief Investment Strategist OVERVIEW During the last bull market, investors focused their attention on rapidly growing businesses
More informationTrading Volatility: Theory and Practice. FPA of Illinois. Conference for Advanced Planning October 7, Presented by: Eric Metz, CFA
Trading Volatility: Theory and Practice Presented by: Eric Metz, CFA FPA of Illinois Conference for Advanced Planning October 7, 2014 Trading Volatility: Theory and Practice Institutional Use Only 1 Table
More informationThe Year of the Snake: Investing in a Rising Rate Environment
The Year of the Snake: Investing in a Rising Rate Environment Duncan W. Richardson, CFA Chief Equity Investment Officer 13 th February 2013 1 Inflation Deflation 2 Depressing Cycle 3 Source: Baseline as
More informationSector Investing: Essential Building Blocks for Portfolio Construction
Sector Investing: Essential Building Blocks for Portfolio Construction April 30, 2014 Brett Hammond Managing Director Head of Index Applied Research MSCI Matthew Goulet, CFA Vice President Sector Investment
More informationAn All-Cap Core Investment Approach
An All-Cap Core Investment Approach A White Paper by Manning & Napier www.manning-napier.com Unless otherwise noted, all figures are based in USD. 1 What is an All-Cap Core Approach An All-Cap Core investment
More informationWisdomTree International Multifactor Fund WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund DWMF/ EMMF THE CASE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND EMERGING MARKETS MULTIFACTOR FUNDS WisdomTree aspires to be at the forefront
More informationQuality Value Momentum Strategy
Quality Value Momentum Strategy Ford Equity Research 11722 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite I San Diego, CA 92121 800.842.0207 (USA) 858.455.6316 Fax www.fordequity.com Background Can a low-turnover portfolio
More informationSPDR Sector Scorecard
Sector investing is a powerful portfolio construction tool to enhance your core equity exposure. Our scorecard provides transparent and quantitative measurements of each sector s valuation, momentum, sentiment
More informationAmerican Funds Growth (MAPS) Select UMA American Funds (Model Portfolio Provider)
American Funds (Model Portfolio Provider) 333 S Hope Street, 52nd Floor Los Angeles, California 90068 Style: Sub-Style: Firm AUM: Firm Strategy AUM: Global Equities Growth-oriented $1,677.4 billion $1.0
More informationFactor Investing: Smart Beta Pursuing Alpha TM
In the spectrum of investing from passive (index based) to active management there are no shortage of considerations. Passive tends to be cheaper and should deliver returns very close to the index it tracks,
More informationAnalytic Investors, LLC Mandate: Buy Write Strategy Hired: 2011
Analytic Investors, LLC Mandate: Buy Write Strategy Hired: 2011 Firm Information Investment Approach Total ARMB Mandate Wells Fargo Asset Management acquired Analytic Investors on October 1, 2016. As of
More informationGlobal Dividend-Paying Stocks: A Recent History
RESEARCH Global Dividend-Paying Stocks: A Recent History March 2013 Stanley Black RESEARCH Senior Associate Stan earned his PhD in economics with concentrations in finance and international economics from
More informationRETHINKING POST-RETIREMENT ASSET ALLOCATION
www.fsadvice.com.au 1 Sam Morris, CFA Sam is an investment specialist with Fidante Partners, who invest in and forms long-term alliances with talented investment professionals to create, grow and support
More informationSample Report PERFORMANCE REPORT I YOUR FUND
Produced on //28 Data as of 6/3/28 PERFORMANCE REPORT I 5 East 57 th Street, Floor, New York, NY 22 Tel (22) 248-532 Fax (646) 45-884 7 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2, Seattle, WA 98 Tel (26) 47-254 Fax (26)
More informationFTSE ActiveBeta Index Series: A New Approach to Equity Investing
FTSE ActiveBeta Index Series: A New Approach to Equity Investing 2010: No 1 March 2010 Khalid Ghayur, CEO, Westpeak Global Advisors Patent Pending Abstract The ActiveBeta Framework asserts that a significant
More informationMACKENZIE Q GLOBAL LARGE CAP QUALITY GROWTH CONSTRAINED USD. Initial Filters. Screening. Fundamental Analysis. Fundamental Analysis II
STRATEGY PROFILE INCEPTION: September 2012 1 BENCHMARK: MSCI World Total Return Index STRATEGY ASSETS: US$ 365 million LEAD PORTFOLIO MANAGER: Paul Musson, CFA STRATEGY OVERVIEW We seek to provide long-term
More informationPortfolio Rebalancing:
Portfolio Rebalancing: A Guide For Institutional Investors May 2012 PREPARED BY Nat Kellogg, CFA Associate Director of Research Eric Przybylinski, CAIA Senior Research Analyst Abstract Failure to rebalance
More informationQ U.S. Sector. (888)
Q1 2018 U.S. Sector www.westendadvisors.com info@westendadvisors.com (888) 500-9025 1 WestEnd Advisors Overview The cornerstone of our investment process is that the macroeconomic environment is a key
More informationPlease refer to For more information regarding the index. July 2017
BNP Paribas Momentum Multi Asset 5 Index Please refer to http://momentum5index.bnpparibas.com For more information regarding the index July 07 Introducing the BNP Paribas Momentum Multi Asset 5 Index Index
More informationMSCI High Dividend Yield Indices Methodology
MSCI High Dividend Yield Indices Methodology 1. Introduction MSCI has created the MSCI High Dividend Yield Indices to serve as a performance benchmark for investors focusing on dividend yield and to help
More informationGetting Smart About Beta
Getting Smart About Beta December 1, 2015 by Sponsored Content from Invesco Due to its simplicity, market-cap weighting has long been a popular means of calculating the value of market indexes. But as
More informationPortfolio construction: The case for small caps. by David Wanis, Senior Portfolio Manager, Smaller Companies
For professional investors only Schroders Portfolio construction: The case for small caps by David Wanis, Senior Portfolio Manager, Smaller Companies Looking solely at passive returns available to investors
More informationTower Square Investment Management LLC Strategic Aggressive
Product Type: Multi-Product Portfolio Headquarters: El Segundo, CA Total Staff: 15 Geography Focus: Global Year Founded: 2012 Investment Professionals: 12 Type of Portfolio: Balanced Total AUM: $1,422
More informationSchroder Oriental Income Fund
1 Fund Ltd is a client of Kepler Trust Intelligence. Material produced by Kepler Trust Intelligence covering should be considered a marketing communication, and is not independent research. Please see
More informationVolatility-Managed Strategies
Volatility-Managed Strategies Public Pension Funding Forum Presentation By: David R. Wilson, CFA Managing Director, Head of Institutional Solutions August 24, 15 Equity Risk Part 1 S&P 5 Index 1 9 8 7
More informationUBS Conservative Income - Muni FI
Product Type: Multi-Product Portfolio Headquarters: New York, NY Total Staff: 2,329 Geography Focus: Global Year Founded: 1989 Investment Professionals: 953 Type of Portfolio: Balanced Total AUM: $627,645
More informationStifel Advisory Account Performance Review Guide. Consulting Services Group
Stifel Advisory Account Performance Review Guide Consulting Services Group Table of Contents Quarterly Performance Reviews are provided to all Stifel advisory clients. Performance reviews help advisors
More informationin-depth Invesco Actively Managed Low Volatility Strategies The Case for
Invesco in-depth The Case for Actively Managed Low Volatility Strategies We believe that active LVPs offer the best opportunity to achieve a higher risk-adjusted return over the long term. Donna C. Wilson
More information