The current ETSO ITC Model and possible development
|
|
- Solomon Perkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The current ETSO ITC Model and possible development 1. Summary The present model for inter-tso compensation for transit (ITC) was introduced in 2002 and has been modified step-by-step from year to year. In 2005, as in 2004, there are 20 ITC parties representing 30 signatory TSOs. The total amount of compensation is estimated to be 370 M. The ITC Agreement is a major step forward towards a single European market in electricity. Progress achieved includes the abolishment of individual fees both for transits (Pancaking) and explicit fees for market actors (Export Fees). Two further points in the model s favour are that it is based on a voluntary agreement and after three years of experience and improvement, it is widely accepted by the participants. The model is also transparent, i e it is understandable and can be checked by the participants. It is in line with and reflects the aims of the objectives of the Directive and Regulation. It is also sufficiently flexible to be further evolved according to Guidelines expected to be published by the European Commission on this issue. Efforts taken to check the results of the present model using more detailed models suggest that an unequivocal and doubtless solution does not exist. This is due to the physical properties of transmission systems and their independent development under different political and economic frameworks Section 2 of this report describes the model step by step, outlines points for which improvements have been considered and explains results expected from more detailed models. Section 3 describes the routines and timetables for its administration. 2. The present ITC model The ITC model is a two-step model which: 1) Calculates compensation for each TSO and thus the total fund. Compensation is based on regulated costs for assets and transmission losses on the horizontal network for each TSO, multiplied by a simple transit key. 2) Finances the fund Financing is mainly claimed from the TSOs on a potential causation basis. A small part is covered by a fee on declared imports of electricity from neighbouring perimeter countries not party to the ITC Agreement. 2.1 Compensation (Cost claims) Each ITC party is compensated according to a cost claim based on regulated costs for assets and transmission losses on the horizontal network for each TSO, multiplied by a transit key. Transit is defined as the hourly minimum of export and import for an ITC party, where export and import are the sums of physical flows (measured values) on all exporting lines and all importing lines respectively. The values are accumulated and reported each month.
2 The model compensates (third party TSO) transmission systems for transit resulting in export from a first TSO area and import in a second area. It is assumed that the exporting and importing areas themselves derive sufficient benefits (from the trading transaction and from national grid tariffs) and do not require any extra compensation. The transit key is the quotient of transit and transit plus consumption. It is calculated monthly where the consumption is taken as the official annual value of the national (or ITC area) consumption for the previous year (e g taken from official statistics or annual reports) divided by 12. Possible future development The definition of transit may appear to be simple. However it has been shown to be practical. In the case of loop flows at a given border the present model assigns transit (and compensation) to both adjacent parties, as it is not possible to identify which party is hosting transit. In this respect definitions of transit and the transit key are not perfect accurate, but, when introducing current mechanism, the involved parties agreed that these definitions lead to reasonable, transparent and comprehensible results. Developments so far considered within ETSO have been to try to identify models where compensation of transit reflects increases and decreases of the prevailing flows in each element of the grid of the host TSO. Such analyses need to be based on more detailed data i.e. recorded situations and the models required are much more complex. Investigations so far indicate that it is doubtful that an unequivocal solution exists. Moreover, although it implies some degree of simplification, the transit key method is still used, even in some complex models. The horizontal network (HN) is defined as the part of the overall transmission network, which potentially transports transits. A standardised auditable procedure for defining the horizontal networks is applied. Grid elements in the overall transmission network are included if they transmit at least 1 MW in at least one of a series of DC load flow calculations performed on an empty network where MW is injected in and extracted from each pair of tie-lines in turn (see Appendix 1). In general only voltage levels of 220 kv and above are included in the horizontal network. HVDC interconnectors are included if they are regarded as a part of the TSO grid, but merchant interconnectors are excluded. However the cross-border flows on both sub 220 kv interconnectors and merchant HVDC links are included in the financing calculations as described in section 2.2. Possible future development The horizontal network procedure as such is regarded as satisfactory. However, some smaller TSOs use sub 200 kv for transmission and therefore, in exceptional cases, these voltage levels are also included according to a specification (see Appendix 2). We have already seen that likely future member countries in the ITC scheme, will almost certainly raise new claims to include lower voltage levels which, although justified, do not fit the limited specification of Appendix 2. The challenge then will be to find a new more satisfactory auditable procedure. 2 / June 2005
3 Regulated costs are specified by each TSO individually and include costs for both assets and transmission losses. The specific values shall be the same as the costs accepted by the national regulators for the domestic transmission access tariffs. The total costs for the horizontal network will of course only represent a part of the costs for the entire network. The asset costs shall include costs for depreciation, yield, operation and maintenance, but exclude costs for ancillary services. Possible future development The costing of assets and losses will have to comply with to the requirements in the Directive and Regulation. The great variations in regulatory practice in Europe produce regulated costs, which vary significantly between countries. This has led to discontentment in countries with lower regulated costs at having to pay for transit at higher rates. At the same time the argument for regulated costs is that there should be no discrimination between national and international (transit) grid users. For 2005 it was envisaged that the new EU regulations would apply and that the costing of the horizontal network and losses would be based on long-run average incremental costs (LRAIC) instead of on regulated values. However, ETSO s attempts to define standard costs or to interpret LRAIC, using replacement costs for assets, have also shown high and widely diverging cost levels. Similar attempts to use regional market prices for losses have also proved difficult. The main challenge is to obtain from regulators and accounts auditors a more formal validation of asset and loss costs. 2.2 Financing the fund When describing how the fund is financed, it is necessary to define different types of parties and countries: ITC Party A country or control block which is party to the ITC Agreement. Internal ITC Parties An ITC Party not having any electrical border to any Perimeter Country. Perimeter Country A country (control block), which is not party to the ITC Agreement, but which has an electrical border to an ITC Party. Edge Country An ITC Party which has at least one electrical border to a Perimeter Country. The fund is financed by two components: The injection fee for perimeter countries to the ITC agreement area. The fee is 1 /MWh based on the declared export from the perimeter country to the ITC area. It is extracted from players using the border interconnectors. Payment based on net flows between the ITC parties finances the rest of the fund. The net flow is calculated from hourly physical (measured) values. For internal ITC parties, the hourly net flow is the absolute value of the total import flow minus the total export flow. For edge countries modified rules apply as described in Appendix 3. 3 / June 2005
4 The basic idea is that the flows from perimeter countries are not counted in the net-flow calculation for the edge country if the edge country is a net importer from both the ITC are and the perimeter country, or if it is a net exporter to both. In other cases the net flow is set to zero if the net exchange with the perimeter country is greater than the net exchange with the ITC area. Possible future development This second step of the model, payment with respect to causation, is a good compromise. It assumes that all physical net imports and exports can potentially cause transit for one or several other TSOs. It is not possible in a meshed network to unequivocally identify the responsibility for power flows based on physical principles only. Certain assumptions are always required. Other methods have been examined, but further analysis is necessary before any proposal can be made. Regardless of the chosen model, the treatment of perimeter countries presents some difficulties: The existence of the injection fee for traders on declared imports was easily justifiable in 2002, when the same fee was applied both inside and at the borders of the scheme. But it is less easy for traders to understand subsequent to the removal of this fee internally. On the other hand, no injection fee would grant a free ride for users in perimeter countries thus discriminating against users within the ITCarea. Already the 1 fee is lower than the average price per net flow within the scheme and some ITC Parties have declared that it would be economically advantageous for them to leave the ITC scheme and instead become a perimeter country. It is questionable however whether the Regulation allows for this possibility. The assumption that export and import are equally responsible for transit costs does not fit with the non-symmetrical application of the perimeter fee. The emergence of other ITC schemes (e g in SEE) bordering to the ETSO scheme creates different categories of perimeter countries with resulting interface difficulties. 3. Routines and timetables The routines for the ITC Agreement so far can be divided up into three periods, ex-ante preparations, monthly settlement, and final settlement. 3.1 Ex-ante preparations This phase comprises the following activities and starts during the spring of the year (n-1) prior to, and finishes preferably in good time before the start of, the agreement period, year (n). Collection and calculation of the horizontal networks The French TSO RTE has preliminarily performed this task so far for most parties. In a few cases the parties themselves have performed it. The collection of the horizontal network from the parties and the calculations and verifications have started in the spring and taken about 3 months totally. 4 / June 2005
5 Costing of the horizontal network and losses After the horizontal networks have been defined, the parties submit to the ETSO Secretariat the total costs for the assets and transmission losses in their horizontal networks. In the autumn 2004 a peer-review audit was arranged to verify, in some cases, that the submitted values were in fact decided by the Regulators. Collection of ex-ante net-flow data The parties send to the ETSO Secretariat historical hourly measured values of net flows for a pre-defined 12-month period, typically 1 July year (n-2) to 30 June year (n-1). Declared imports from perimeter countries are also sent for the same period. Preparation of the ex-ante spreadsheet Using the above data, the ETSO Secretariat calculates an ex-ante spread sheet, which shows the estimated cost claim, contribution to the fund, and net result for each ITC Party as well as the total amounts. A complication so far, which has resulted in last minute negotiations, concerns a reduction of the Swiss cost claim to compensate for the fact that a proportion of the Swiss interconnectors is not open to the market. In the current agreement this reduction was divided; Italy received half, and the other parties split the rest. The final ex-ante spread sheet is attached as an appendix to the ITC Agreement. Preparation of the ITC Agreement The Agreement is prepared by the ETSO Secretariat for signature by the parties before the start of the year. 3.2 Monthly Settlement Supplement to the ITC Agreement there is a document, the Business Process Description (BPD), which describes responsibilities and reporting routines for data and calculations for the monthly settlement. Two TSO:s, RWE and ETRANS (soon to become Swissgrid) act as data administrators and they have also been given this role for the ETSO ITC Agreement, for which they also perform settlement calculations. RWE is responsible for northern Europe and ETRANS for southern Europe. Each month the parties send data to their Data Administrator which initiates the monthly settlement process according to the following timetable: Notification Day within 10 business days after the end of each month, each ITC Party faxes a Notification Statement to the Data administrator with details of his net export, net import, declared import from perimeter countries and transit for the previous month. Compilation Report within 15 business days after month end the Data Administrators check the received data and post it, protected by a password, on the ETSO web-site in a report to be checked and approved by each ITC Parties contact person. The Data Administrator settles any disputes, performs calculations and submits them to the ETSO Secretariat. 5 / June 2005
6 Settlement Notification within 20 business days after month end, the Secretariat posts the settlement result on the web-site to be approved or disputed by the contact persons within 2 days. Formal Approval within 23 business days after month end the contact person shall then sign and fax the approved version, after any correction, to the Data Administrator. Billing According to the final approved Settlement Notification the compensation is netted (so that each ITC Party is either a sender or receiver) and converted into bilateral bills. Bills are then sent by the ITC Parties themselves (the senders) according to their internal routines. 3.3 Final settlement Figures collected during the year are finally checked to see whether over or under funding has occurred. If so an additional settlement procedure is performed to correct this. In addition any necessary capping of the total fund is also taken care of. These procedures are defined in the Agreement and should be completed by the end of March of year (n+1). 4. Final comments The voluntary agreement to use the current mechanism was reached because it gives reasonable and comprehensible results. After three years of experience and improvement, the present model is widely accepted by the participants. It is more transparent than other models that are currently being considered for the future. Further improvements have been suggested to incorporate the requirements specified in the new Directive on common rules for the Internal Market in Electricity and the Regulation on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity. First results based on more detailed load-flow calculation show that such approaches are no guarantee for better more cost-reflective results. Comparison with the current model has so far shown that the compensation achieved with simplified models is reasonable. It is therefore debatable whether a supposed more complex load-flow based model produces a better result than the current model. Complex models have the additional drawbacks of requiring input data in the form of national load-flow scenarios and these have proved cumbersome to collect. Also the models are not easily understood and therefore the results are not transparent. Some of the difficulties experienced, e g costing and treatment of perimeter countries, are partly independent of the model itself. As a result it has been suggested within ETSO that it could be sensible to continue to apply a simple model for ITC settlement. A simple model is defined as one that uses input data based on measured export and import flows (as does the present model) rather than load-flow scenarios. The present ITC model, modified to satisfy the Directive and Regulation, could provide the basis for such a simple permanent model. More complex models could serve in the background, for example to calibrate parameters to be used in simpler settlement models or to verify that the results obtained are reasonable. 6 / June 2005
7 Appendix 1 Procedure to determine the horizontal network 1. Principle - simulation of one-to-one transits The horizontal network for each country 1 is the set of grid elements whose flows are significantly influenced by transit. Its determination is based on the variation of flows on lines and transformers when adding a transit, i.e. a flow entering on a set of tie-lines and exiting through another set. Each country is studied independently. Tie-lines are modelled as the only external injections or extractions from the network of each country. It is impossible to simulate all possible transits through a network; as there are too many possible patterns and an infinite number of possible magnitudes. However, any transit through a country can be seen as a combination of several individual transits, called one-to-one transit. Each one-to-one transit is defined as a flow of MW entering a country on one tie-line to a neighbouring country and leaving the same country via another tie line, with no flows on all other tielines. For a country with N tie-lines, there are N*(N-1) possible one-to-one transits. If the flow on a grid element is significantly influenced by at least one of all the possible one-to-one transits, it isincluded in the horizontal network. A significant influence is defined as the absolute difference between the flows on the element with and without a one-to-one transit being above 1 MW for a transit magnitude of MW. (The model is further exemplified in Appendix 1.1) The simulation model used is a DC load flow on an empty network. 2. The procedure A simulation administrator is appointed to perform this task in co-ordination with the involved parties. Typically the procedure described in the 6 steps below takes about 2 3 months. Step 1 - The simulation administrator sends a first reference data set to each country (e g for UCTE, the UCTE recorded snapshot of xxth Jan 200Y, am, or the final reference data set of the previous year). Step 2 - Each country validates its own network in the first reference data set. For this purpose only resistance and reactance for lines, and resistance, reactance and nominal power for transformers, need to be validated. Step 3 - The Simulation Administrator creates a final validated reference file for simulation. Step 4 - The simulation administrator performs the simulations of MW one-to-one normalised transits to determine the horizontal network for most countries. However a country can instead choose to perform its own simulation following the method described. Step 5 - The simulation administrator determines which lines and transformers are included in the horizontal network for each voltage level and calculates selection ratios for each voltage level: The percentage of line lengths included in the horizontal network, compared with the total length of lines described in the final reference data set. These percentages are calculated pro rata the reactances available in the final reference data set. Real lengths can be used instead when data is available. 1 Country is used throughout even though some ITC Parties have borders which differ from the national ones (e g Denmark is divided into two parties, and 2 Austrian control areas are part of ITC country Germany. 7 / June 2005
8 The percentage of nominal power of transformers included in the horizontal network, compared to the nominal power of transformers described in the final reference data set. These selection ratios will be used in the cost procedure to calculate the asset costs of the horizontal network by multiplying them by the asset costs of the overall network for each voltage level. Step 6 - The simulation administrator, and countries who have performed simulations themselves, send the following results to the ETSO Steering Committee and to each (other) country: The final reference data set, The list of all the grid elements that are included in its horizontal network, The list of all the grid elements that are not included in its horizontal network, The total length of lines included in the horizontal network by voltage level and the sum of the nominal powers of transformers included in its horizontal network. Each country checks the results and sends any comments to the Simulation Administrator. 3. Auditability So far it has not been considered necessary to appoint an independent auditor. Since all concerned parties will receive all the results (horizontal network, cost of horizontal network) from each other, they will be able to check (audit) the results of the other parties to the contract. 8 / June 2005
9 Appendix 2 Conditions for including lower voltage levels than 200 kv as exceptions in the Horizontal Network 1. Background As a general rule within ETSO, the horizontal network to be considered for transit compensation shall only include transmission voltage levels of 220 kv and above. Despite the fact that the networks of several TSOs include a substantial amount of lines of voltage lower than 220 kv, inclusion of them generally in the calculation of the horizontal network would create many practical difficulties. In most countries these voltage levels are regarded as distribution. However, a few countries usually with smaller transmission systems still use lines of voltage kv significantly for transmission. Therefore it is permitted to make well-founded exceptions for these voltage levels. The ETSO Steering Committee must approve applications for such exceptions. 2. Physical or economic inclusion in the horizontal network The question of inclusion or not in the horizontal network can concern physical inclusion in the network model and/or economic inclusion in the cost claim. 2.1 Physical inclusion As in the case of merchant HVDC links the flows through certain 110 kv lines will have to be included in the physical representation, in order that the flows through the rest of the horizontal network will be correct. Examples of such exceptions are 190 kv lines which interconnect two ITC countries, or between ITC countries and other countries, and make energy exchange or transit possible. 2.2 Economic inclusion 190 kv transmission networks can be included in their entirety in the calculation of the horizontal network when the following conditions are satisfied: when there is not (and never has been) any significant transmission system at a voltage level between and 0 kv. Significant in this context is taken to mean more than 20 % (line length or MW.km). when transit in the 110 kv network represents a significant part (say more than 10%) of the total flow in the 110 kv network. Calculation of which part of such networks actually are included in the horizontal network is then performed in the same way as for the 0 and 220 kv networks. 9 / June 2005
10 Appendix 3 Treatment of perimeter flows in ITC mechanism Background In the context of the ITC mechanism and perimeter flows, three kinds of country can be identified: Internal ITC countries (IC) these countries are party to the ITC agreement and have borders with other ITC countries only. Perimeter countries (PC) these countries are not party to the ITC agreement but have borders with at least one ITC country. ITC edge countries (EC) these countries are party to the ITC agreement and have borders both with at least one ITC country and at least one perimeter country. In the 2003 ETSO ITC mechanism, perimeter countries pay a fee of 1 /MWh to the ITC fund for declared imports to the ITC area. The neighbouring ITC edge country collects this fee from the importer. (So far no ETSO fee for export to perimeter countries has been applied.) In addition the perimeter flows are counted when calculating both transit (potential income) and net flow (potential payment) for the edge country. In connection with preparing the rules for the ITC agreement for 2004 some countries (including some new and potential ITC countries) identified flaws in this treatment of perimeter flows, as follows: If an edge country (e.g. Finland, Greece) imports simultaneously both from a perimeter country and from other ITC countries, the import from PC does not cause any transit in the other ITC countries. Why should it then be included in the net flow of the edge country? The same question applies for an edge country (e.g. France) exporting simultaneously both to a perimeter country (GB) and to other ITC countries. If an edge country (e.g. Poland, Finland in dry year) imports from a perimeter country and exports to other ITC countries, its contribution based on Net Flow (including perimeter flows, thus reflecting transits created in ITC and perimeter countries) can be smaller than the contribution that would be calculated without perimeter flows (reflecting transits created in other ITC countries only). The opposite would be expected. Solution Transit calculation for edge country: Perimeter flows must be included in the calculation of transit for the ITC edge country, to compensate this country for any transit resulting from trade between other ITC countries and perimeter countries. Net-flow calculation for edge country: In order to reflect only the transits created in ITC countries, the net flow calculation for the edge country should exclude the perimeter flow. It should also be adjusted to remain smaller than the net flow that would be calculated including perimeter flows. This is done by also excluding any resulting transit component in the same direction. This is illustrated by eight simple examples below, which show different exchange patterns between the ITC edge country (EC) and the rest of the ITC area (ITC) and perimeter countries (PC) respectively. For each example the modified net flow (NF) is shown. 10 / June 2005
11 Calculation of net flow (Examples 1-4) Net flow (excluding PC flow) in export direction (from ITC 1 to ITC). Subtract PC contribution to transit through ITC 1, if in export direction (from PC to ICT 1 ) 1) NF = 60 (= ) 2) NF = 0 (= ) 3) NF = (= 0) 4) NF = (= 0) ITC 1 PC ITC Calculation of net flow (Examples 5-8) Net flow (excluding PC flow) in import direction (from ITC to ITC 1 ). Subtract PC contribution to transit through ITC 1, if in import direction (from ITC 1 to PC) 5) NF = (= 0) 6) NF = (= 0) 7) NF = 60 (= ) 8) NF = 0 (= ) ITC 1 PC ITC 11 / June 2005
Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, C(2010) XXX final Draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No / of on laying down guidelines relating to the inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanism and
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
24.9.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 250/5 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 838/2010 of 23 September 2010 on laying down guidelines relating to the inter-transmission system operator compensation
More informationERGEG Public Consultation on Guidelines on Transmission Tarification 1. - Evaluation of the Comments Received
ERGEG Public Consultation on Guidelines on Transmission Tarification 1 - Evaluation of the Comments Received - 18-07-2005 INTRODUCTION This document contains the evaluation by ERGEG of the comments received
More informationIntraday Implicit CrossBorder allocation on BE-NL. and borders (Interim Implicit Cross Border Intraday BE-NL. Description of the allocation mechanism
Intraday Implicit CrossBorder allocation on BE-NL and borders (Interim Implicit Cross Border Intraday BE-NL Description of the allocation mechanism version 2.0) Description of the allocation mechanism
More informationIntraday Implicit Cross- Border allocation on BE-FR border. Description of the allocation mechanism
Intraday Implicit Cross- Border allocation on BE-FR border Description of the allocation mechanism Version Date 11 July 2016 Contents 1 Introduction...3 2 General Context and rationale of the project...3
More informationRegional Flow-based allocations. State-of-play
Page 1 of 15 Regional Flow-based allocations State-of-play March 2007 ETSO Final paper Page 2 of 15 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Flow-based allocations... 3 3. Status of flow-based allocations... 6
More informationMr. Heinz HILBRECHT Director DG TREN EC Rue de la Loi 200 BE-1049 BRUXELLES. 17 March Dear Mr. Hilbrecht,
Mr. Heinz HILBRECHT Director DG TREN EC Rue de la Loi 200 BE-1049 BRUXELLES 17 March 2009 Dear Mr. Hilbrecht, We are very pleased to send you ETSO response to the EC Consultation Document on the Inter-TSO
More informationSouth East Europe Electricity Market options paper
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT DIRECTORATE C - Conventional Energies Electricity & Gas Brussels, 5 December 2005 DG TREN/C2/MS South East Europe Electricity Market options
More information29 June 2016 Disclaimer This explanatory document is submitted by all TSOs to all NRAs for information and clarification purposes only accompanying the All TSOs proposal for methodology for congestion
More informationCID Methodology Explanatory note
29 June 2016 Disclaimer This explanatory document is submitted by all TSOs to all NRAs for information and clarification purposes only accompanying the All TSOs proposal for methodology for congestion
More informationPower Trading in the Coupled European Markets
Power Trading in the Coupled European Markets Challenges for policy-makers February 2016-1 - Europe Economics is registered in England No. 3477100. Registered offices at Chancery House, 53-64 Chancery
More informationPresent: Philippe de LADOUCETTE, Chairman, Olivier CHALLAN BELVAL, Hélène GASSIN, Jean-Pierre SOTURA and Michel THIOLLIERE, Commissioners.
Deliberation Deliberation of the French Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) dated 2 October 2013 approving the implicit Day-Ahead allocation method for interconnection capacity within the North- West Europe
More informationCROSS BORDER CAPACITY ALLOCATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF ANCILLARY SERVICES
CROSS BORDER CAPACITY ALLOCATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF ANCILLARY SERVICES A POSITION PAPER BY THE ENTSO-E ANCILLARY SERVICES WORKING GROUP JANUARY 2012 Purpose & objectives of the paper This paper further
More informationCHARGING METHODOLOGY STATEMENT FOR THE ELECLINK INTERCONNECTOR
CHARGING METHODOLOGY STATEMENT FOR THE ELECLINK INTERCONNECTOR ISSUE 1.0 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Interconnector charging methodology... 3 2.1 Introduction... 3 2.2 Objectives of the Charging
More informationC2-102 COMMON NORDIC BALANCE MANAGEMENT. K.LINDSTRÖM FINGRID (Finland)
21, rue d'artois, F-75008 Paris http://www.cigre.org C2-102 Session 2004 CIGRÉ COMMON NORDIC BALANCE MANAGEMENT O.GJERDE* STATNETT (Norway) F.WIBROE ELTRA (Denmark) J-E. FISCHER ELKRAFT (Denmark) K.LINDSTRÖM
More informationCHAPTER 1. General Provisions
IFA Interconnector s Border Specific Annex to the Harmonised Allocation Rules for long-term transmission rights in accordance with Article 52 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1719 of 26 September 2016
More informationPublic consultation. 6 October 2015
Public consultation 6 October 2015 Public consultation by the French Energy Regulatory Commission of 6 October 2015 on the introduction of 30-minute power trading products in the organised market and at
More informationAustrian Power Grid Comments to ACER consultation
Austrian Power Grid Comments to ACER consultation Austrian Power Grid (APG) welcomes the invitation to respond to the Public Consultation on Assessment of the Annual Cross-Border Infrastructure Compensation
More informationComments on CEPA s draft conclusions in relation to European transmission tariffs
July 2015 Frontier Economics 1 ACER commissioned CEPA to review harmonisation of transmission tariffs in Europe, and specifically to: assess whether increased harmonisation of electricity transmission
More informationThe Model of Implicit Capacity Allocation in the Baltic States
The Model of Implicit Capacity Allocation in the Baltic States This document describes a model of implicit allocation of gas transmission capacity in the Baltic States. Implicit capacity allocation is
More informationCurrent State of Intraday Markets in Europe May 2007
Current State of Intraday Markets in Europe May 2007 ETSO Report: Current State of Intraday Markets in Europe Page 1 of 18 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Objective and scope of this report... 3 2. Intraday
More informationON TRANSFER CAPACITY ALLOCATION OVER THE GRID INTERCONNECTING ITALY WITH FRANCE FOR THE YEAR 2004
AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTORITÀ PER L ENERGIA ELETTRICA E IL GAS AND COMMISSION DE REGULATION DE L ENERGIE ON TRANSFER CAPACITY ALLOCATION OVER THE GRID INTERCONNECTING ITALY WITH FRANCE FOR THE YEAR 2004 Introduction
More informationEUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 12 June 2009 (OR. en) 2007/0198 (COD) PE-CO S 3651/09 E ER 173 CODEC 704
EUROPEA U IO THE EUROPEA PARLIAMT THE COU CIL Brussels, 12 June 2009 (OR. en) 2007/0198 (COD) PE-CO S 3651/09 ER 173 CODEC 704 LEGISLATIVE ACTS A D OTHER I STRUMTS Subject: REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More information(Blackline) VOLUME NO. III Page No. 878 SCHEDULING PROTOCOL
VOLUME NO. III Page No. 878 SCHEDULING PROTOCOL VOLUME NO. III Page No. 879 SCHEDULING PROTOCOL Table of Contents SP 1 SP 1.1 OBJECTIVES, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE Objectives SP 1.2 Definitions SP 1.2.1 Master
More informationAGREEMENT ON TRANSMISSION SERVICE ON FINGRID'S CROSS-BORDER CONNECTIONS BETWEEN RUSSIA AND FINLAND, NO /2018
AGREEMENT ON TRANSMISSION SERVICE ON FINGRID'S CROSS-BORDER CONNECTIONS BETWEEN RUSSIA AND FINLAND, NO. 2128 /2018 PARTIES This agreement (the Agreement ) has been concluded by and between: 1) Fingrid
More information- When did the regulation(s) regarding disclosure come into force? 12/5/2015
Assessment of the implementation of the BPR: Cyprus Author: Dr. Michalis Syrimis Describe the actual implementation in the MS Date (yyyy/mm/dd) GENERAL Disclosure system implemented Disclosure Regulation
More informationScope and policy options for Framework Guidelines on Harmonised transmission tariff structures. -Public Hearing -
Contact Details (as instructed): Name Ana Pinto/Mikel Amundarain Company EDP Gás/Naturgás Energia Comercializadora Contact email Anateixeira.pinto@edp.pt/mikel.amundarain@naturgasenergia.com Phone +351
More informationThe market setup in the Baltics explanation with examples
The market setup in the Baltics explanation with examples Table of Contents The market setup in the Nordic-... 3 Baltic exchange area... 3 Daily routines at Nord Pool... 4 Price calculation principles...
More informationThe TSO side of pan-european XBorder trading in high frequencies: The Role of Scheduling. Michael Schaefer Project Manager, Amprion System Operation
The TSO side of pan-european XBorder trading in high frequencies: The Role of Scheduling Michael Schaefer Project Manager, Amprion System Operation Diploma in Information Science & Advanced Postgraduate
More informationEuropean transmission tariff structures Cambridge Economic Policy Associates
European transmission tariff structures Cambridge Economic Policy Associates 24 March 2015 Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (CEPA) We are an economic and financial policy consulting business Our energy
More informationMARCH A report for the. Australian Energy Market Commission
MODELS OF INTER-REGIONAL TRANSMISSION CHARGING MARCH 2008 A report for the Australian Energy Market Commission The Brattle Group rue Ducale 83 Bruxelles 1000 Belgium tel: +32.2790.3580 fax: +32.2790.3581
More informationThe Nordic Market Model 10 Years of Experience
The Nordic Market Model 10 Years of Experience 7 th International Workshop on Electric Power Control Centers Ortisei, Italy May 25-28, 2003 Presentation by Ole Gjerde Senior Adviser, Statnett SF 1 Contents
More informationThe new electricity market arrangements in Ukraine
The new electricity market arrangements in Ukraine A report prepared by ECS Project Office April 2016 FINAL DRAFT Revisions Table Version Date Description FINAL DRAFT 1.0 November16, 2015 Internal Draft
More informationLONG-TERM TRANSMISSION NETWORK EXPANSION PLANNING CONSIDERING THE ECONOMIC CRITERIA AND THE FLOW-BASED MARKET MODEL
Milan Vukasovic 1, Oliver John 2, Nenad Stefanovic 3 LONG-TERM TRANSMISSION NETWORK EXPANSION PLANNING CONSIDERING THE ECONOMIC CRITERIA AND THE FLOW-BASED MARKET MODEL 1 VERBUND-Austrian Power Grid AG,
More informationELIA LFC Block Operational Agreement
ELIA LFC Block Operational Agreement Revision History V0.1 10.07.2018 ELIA s proposal for public consultation Disclaimer This document, provided by ELIA, is the draft for stakeholder consultation of the
More informationCHAPTER II INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS
INT 0326 121023 25 October 2012 Draft CHAPTER II INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS 2.1. General Requirements 2.1.1. General Provisions (i) This section of the Network Code aims to provide for the appropriate
More informationCongestion Management Guidelines. Compliance report
Congestion Management Guidelines Compliance report Report 8/2007 Congestion Management Guidelines Compliance report Report 8/2007 NordREG c/o Danish Energy Regulatory Authority Nyropsgade 30 DK- 1780
More informationImpact of the storage obligation on trading and market development in Poland
Amstelveenseweg 998 1081 JS Amsterdam Phone: + 31 20 520 7970 Attn: Mrs. Aldona Kaźmierska Vice-Director Department of Markets Development and Consumer Issues URE, Urzad Regulacji Energetyki Ul. Chłodna
More informationOPINION on position limits on Swiss Power Base contracts. I. Introduction and legal basis
Date: 24 September 2018 ESMA70-155-2938 OPINION on position limits on Swiss Power Base contracts I. Introduction and legal basis 1. On 20 October 2017, the European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA
More informationThe Commission s Study on Company
HOME STATE TAXATION VS. COMMON BASE TAXATION jurisdictions by an automatic formula, and taxed at the national tax rates, which member states will continue to establish themselves. A comprehensive solution
More informationGas Market Modelling for the Quo Vadis Project 26 July, Budapest, Hungary. Memo on the Q&A session of the Workshop
Gas Market Modelling for the Quo Vadis Project 26 July, Budapest, Hungary Memo on the Q&A session of the Workshop Summary During the workshop, the European Gas Market Model (EGMM) was introduced to the
More informationCase No COMP/M IBERDROLA / SCOTTISH POWER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/03/2007
EN Case No COMP/M.4517 - IBERDROLA / SCOTTISH POWER Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/03/2007 In electronic
More informationIntraday Cross Border The Netherlands-Belgium
Intraday Cross Border The Netherlands-Belgium Content 1. Overall design 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Process description Capacity calculation Elbas trading platform Tradable products Timeline & Nominations 2. Contractual
More informationWe appreciate your feedback
Publishing date: 05/09/2012 Document title: We appreciate your feedback Please click on the icon to take a 5 online survey and provide your feedback about this document Draft Framework Guidelines on rules
More informationObstacles to Trade and Compatibility of Market Rules in Southeast Europe
Obstacles to Trade and Compatibility of Market Rules in Southeast Europe Findings/ Recommendations of SEETEC Final Draft Report Athens Forum June 22st, 2006 REM-1202-47RP-I-0006 National wholesale markets
More informationIntraday Cross Border The Netherlands-Belgium
Intraday Cross Border The Netherlands-Belgium Content 1. Overall design 1. Process description 2. Capacity calculation 3. Elbas trading platform 4. Tradable products 5. Timeline & Nominations 2. Contractual
More informationTreatment of Losses by Network Operators an ERGEG Position Paper for public consultation
Treatment of Losses by Network Operators an ERGEG Position Paper for public consultation Comments from: Leonardo ENERGY The Global Community for Sustainable Energy Professionals by Roman Targosz Sergio
More informationSouth East Europe Regional Electricity Market. Belgrade, 01 November 2007
South East Europe Regional Electricity Market Belgrade, 01 November 2007 1 Main Purpose of the presentation Brief info on the energy sector of the Western Balkans about the present energy situation in
More information5. Vorlesung Energiewirtschaft II: Risk Management and Electricity Trade
5. Vorlesung Energiewirtschaft II: Risk Management and Electricity Trade Georg Zachmann V 5.3-1 - Agenda of Today's Lecture 1) Organizational Issues 2) Summary of Last Weeks Findings 3) Market Efficiency
More informationTRANSGRID PRICING METHODOLOGY 2015/ /18. Contents
Pricing Methodology TRANSGRID PRICING METHODOLOGY 2015/16 2017/18 Contents Pricing Methodology 1 Introduction 3 2 Duration 3 3 Which services are subject to this pricing methodology? 4 4 Overview of the
More informationTRANSMISSION TARIFF METHODOLOGY FOR THE WEST AFRICAN POWER POOL
AUTHORIDADE REGIONAL REGULADORA DE ELETRICIDADE DA CEDEAO ECOWAS REGIONAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY AUTHORITY AUTORITÉ DE RÉGULATION RÉGIONALE DU SECTEUR DE L ÉLECTRICITÉ DE LA CEDEAO TRANSMISSION TARIFF
More informationGrid Investments from a Nordic Perspective
Grid Investments from a Nordic Perspective NordREG recommendations 1 Background and task As one of the challenges for the further development of the Nordic electricity market has in the last few years
More informationThe Road to the I-SEM
The Road to the I-SEM 1 Agenda Development of power markets in Ireland and Northern Ireland Development of power markets across Europe Market coupling explained The road to the I-SEM The elements of the
More informationEFET Proposal on Regional Independent System Operator (R_ISO) A CEER Response Paper
EFET Proposal on Regional Independent System Operator (R_ISO) A CEER Response Paper Ref. C08-GWG-42-03 6 February 2008 Council of European Energy Regulators ASBL 28 rue le Titien, 1000 Bruxelles Arrondissement
More informationMARI Project. BSG meeting 7/12. Manually Activated Reserves Initiative - Creating a European platform for the exchange of mfrr balancing energy
Project Manually Activated Reserves Initiative - Creating a European platform for the exchange of mfrr balancing energy BSG meeting 7/12 Presented by: Ulf Kasper/Benjamin Genet The MARI project now formally
More informationCalifornia ISO Report. Regional Marginal Losses Surplus Allocation Impact Study
California ISO Report Regional Surplus Allocation Impact Study October 6, 2010 Regional Surplus Allocation Impact Study Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 1 Issue and Background... 3 2 Study Framework...
More informationExplanatory Paper for Transmission Loss Adjustment Factor (TLAF) Calculation Methodology Publication Date: 27/09/2012 Version 1.0
Explanatory Paper for Transmission Loss Adjustment Factor (TLAF) Calculation Methodology Publication Date: 27/09/2012 Version 1.0 Published on 27/09/2012 Page 1 of 20 CONTENTS 1. Introduction/Background...
More informationCross-Border Intraday: Questions & Answers
Last update: 04/12/2018 Cross-Border Intraday: Questions & Answers 1. What is the Cross-Border Intraday initiative? The Cross-Border Intraday initiative (XBID Project) started as a joint initiative by
More informationThe South African Grid Code. Transmission Tariff Code. Version 9.0
The South African Grid Code Transmission Tariff Code Version 9.0 This document is approved by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) Issued by: RSA Grid Code Secretariat Contact: Mr. Bernard
More informationAllocation on the France-Belgium interconnection. Intra-day allocation mechanism
Allocation on the France-Belgium interconnection Intra-day allocation mechanism Information note Table of contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Product characteristics... 2 2.1. Basis principles... 2 2.2. The
More informationTransmission Loss Factor Methodology
Transmission Loss Factor Methodology Discussion Paper Operations & Reliability Draft February 9, 2005 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...3 1.1 Legislative Direction.....3 1.2 Goal and Objectives... 3
More informationAllegato A. Summary WHEREAS... 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Subject matter and scope Article 2 Definitions... 4
Greece-Italy TSOs proposal for methodology for redispatching and countertrading cost-sharing in accordance with Article 74 of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a Guideline
More informationCross border participation in the capacity mechanism. Sharing the spoils...
Cross border participation in the capacity mechanism Sharing the spoils... 5 June 2015 First GB capacity auction led to payments of 1billion for c50gw of capacity Outcome of first CM auction Main recipient
More information(Text with EEA relevance)
18.12.2014 L 363/121 COMMISSION IMPLEMTING REGULATION (EU) No 1348/2014 of 17 December 2014 on data reporting implementing Article 8(2) and Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 of the European
More informationContent Abbreviations Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10 Article 11 Article 12
All TSOs proposal for common settlement rules applicable to all intended exchanges of energy as a result of the reserve replacement process, frequency restoration process with manual and automatic activation
More informationISO Tariff Original Sheet No. 637 ISO TARIFF APPENDIX L. Rate Schedules
Original Sheet No. 637 ISO TARIFF APPENDIX L Rate Schedules Original Sheet No. 638 Schedule 1 Grid Management Charge The Grid Management Charge (ISO Tariff Section 8.0) is a formula rate designed to recover
More informationTable of Contents List of Figures...3 List of Tables...3 Definitions and Abbreviations...4 Introduction...7
Explanatory document to all TSOs proposal for a methodology for the TSO-TSO settlement rules for the intended exchange of energy in accordance with Article 50(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195
More informationSTCP 16-1 Issue 005 Investment Planning
STCP 16-1 Issue 005 Investment Planning STC Procedure Document Authorisation Company Name of Party Representative Signature Date National Grid Electricity Transmission plc SP Transmission plc Scottish
More informationBrexit and electricity interconnectors. Jason Mann
Brexit and electricity interconnectors Jason Mann 12 May 2018 Expansion of UK interconnection capacity driven by strong fundamentals and benign policies - but complicated by Brexit Mounting political pressures
More informationBritNed border specific annex to the Allocation Rules. GB NL border
BritNed border specific annex to the Allocation Rules GB NL border CHAPTER 1 General Provisions Section 1 Subject-matter and scope 1. In accordance with Article 4 (Regional specificities) of the Allocation
More informationSystem Operating Policies on Compensation between Elia and Nemo Link
System Operating Policies on Compensation between Elia and Nemo Link 1 WHEREAS Elia and Nemo Link have entered into the Joint Operation Agreement ( JOA ) on the 25 th of February 2015 for the purpose of
More informationReview of the Shareholder Rights Directive
Review of the Shareholder Rights Directive Position of Better Finance for All (The European Federation of Financial Services Users) 27 October 2014 ID number in Transparency Register: 24633926420-79 Better
More informationREALISEGRID. WP3 Final Workshop. Rome - 31 March TSO incentivization policies for cross-border transmission development
REALISEGRID WP3 Final Workshop Rome - 31 March 2011 TSO incentivization policies for cross-border transmission development WP3.6 ongoing results OME & RSE Outline Background Building cross-border interconnections
More informationSUMMARY OF THE ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION OF REGARDING PRICE OF THE SERVICES OF ACCESS TO INTERCONNECTION LINES
SUMMARY OF THE ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION OF REGARDING PRICE OF THE SERVICES OF ACCESS TO INTERCONNECTION LINES 1 Estonian Competition Authority, November 16, 2015 (Estonian
More informationAnders Plejdrup Houmøller 10 May Wholesale market models and the role of exchanges and traders. Prepared by Anders Plejdrup Houmøller
Wholesale market models and the role of exchanges and traders Prepared by Anders Plejdrup Houmøller www. erranet.org Agenda The trading system. The spot market. Transparency. Surveillance of the market.
More informationThe North Seas Countries Offshore Grid Initiative
The North Seas Countries Offshore Grid Initiative NSCOGI 2013/2014 progress report August 2014 1 Objectives of the North Seas Countries Offshore Grid Initiative In December 2012, Ministers of the North
More informationPresent: Olivier CHALLAN BELVAL, Jean-Pierre SOTURA, and Michel THIOLLIERE, Commissioners.
Deliberation Deliberation of the French Energy Regulatory Commission dated 12 March 2014 approving amendments to capacity allocation rules for the France - Spain interconnection Present: Olivier CHALLAN
More informationContents Introduction Chapter 1 - Security Policy... 6
Policy statement Contents Introduction... 5 PURPOSE... 5 SYSTEM OPERATOR POLICIES TO ACHIEVE THE PPOS and dispatch objective... 5 Avoid Cascade Failure... 5 Frequency... 6 Other Standards... 6 Restoration...
More informationThe North Seas Countries Offshore Grid Initiative
The North Seas Countries Offshore Grid Initiative Deliverable 1 - final report This report identifies areas where the incompatibility of national market and regulatory regimes acts as a barrier to coordinated
More informationANCILLARY SERVICES TO BE DELIVERED IN DENMARK TENDER CONDITIONS
Ancillary services to be delivered in Denmark. Tender conditions 1/49 Energinet.dk Tonne Kjærsvej 65 DK-7000 Fredericia +45 70 10 22 44 info@energinet.dk VAT no. 28 98 06 71 Date: 30. august 2017 Author:
More informationCongestion Revenue Rights Auction Efficiency Track 1B Draft Tariff Language
6.5.1.3 Public Market Information 6.5.1.3.1 Annually, the CAISO shall publish the following information including, but not limited to: (a) Market Clearing Prices for all Aggregated PNodes used in the CRR
More informationRULES. For. Article 1
Pursuant to Article 70 under the Law on Energy (Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia no. 16/2011), and Article 19, item 18 of the by Law, the Transmission System Operator of Macedonia, a joint
More informationIntraday Capacity Allocation Rules. Contents
Intraday Capacity Allocation Rules Rules for the Intraday Capacity Allocation for the Netherlands-Germany Interconnections Contents 1. Definitions and interpretation... 2 2. General... 4 3. Determination
More informationACCESS RULES TO FRANCE-ITALY, SWITZERLAND-ITALY, AUSTRIA- ITALY, SLOVENIA-ITALY, GREECE-ITALY INTERCONNECTIONS (Capacity Allocation Auction Rules)
ACCESS RULES TO FRANCE-ITALY, SWITZERLAND-ITALY, AUSTRIA- ITALY, SLOVENIA-ITALY, GREECE-ITALY INTERCONNECTIONS (Capacity Allocation Auction Rules) 2011 Page 1 of 117 Section I. Introduction... 4 1.01.
More informationSection T: Settlement and Trading Charges. how Trading Charges for each Trading Party and National Grid are determined;
BSC Simple Guide Section T: Settlement and Trading Charges Section T sets out: (a) (b) (c) how Trading Charges for each Trading Party and National Grid are determined; the data required in order to calculate
More informationCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION (DRAFT)
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI New Delhi, the 20 th of June 2013 NOTIFICATION (DRAFT) No.L-1/132/2013/CERC.- In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 178 of the Electricity
More informationJan- Sept/13. Sept/12. - % of turnover % Research and development expenses
Stock exchange release 1 (13) January September 2013: Improved result for the review period The Group s turnover between January and September was 388 million ( 368 million). The Group's operating profit
More informationRESPONSE TO ACER'S CONSULTATION ON TARIFFS
RESPONSE TO ACER'S CONSULTATION ON TARIFFS Question 1: What other issues should be dealt with in this Framework Guideline? What is the evidence for including these issues? Please provide justification.
More informationPolish model of Capacity Market
Polish model of Capacity Market As of 18 January 2018, the Act of 8 December 2017 on capacity market ( Act ) has entered into force. The aims of the Act are: (c) (d) to introduce incentives for construction
More informationAllocation Rules for Forward Capacity Allocation
Allocation Rules for Forward Capacity Allocation 29 June 2016 1 P a g e Contents CHAPTER 1 General Provisions... 6 Article 1 Subject-matter and scope... 6 Article 2 Definitions and interpretation... 6
More information3 rd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes
3 rd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes Regulatory Framework & Incentives for Infrastructure Development Sergio Ascari VIS Consultants Gas Advisor, Florence School
More informationSEMOpx. Operating Procedures: DAM, IDA, IDC. Updated Draft: 09/03/18. Draft prepared for discussion at the BLG meeting, 14 March 2018.
SEMOpx Updated Draft: 09/03/18 Operating Procedures: DAM, IDA, IDC Draft prepared for discussion at the BLG meeting, 14 March 2018. 1 CONTENTS A. Introduction 5 A.1 General provisions 5 A.1.1 Purpose and
More information9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the
First Revised Sheet No. 121 ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. I Replacing Original Sheet No. 121 9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. 9.1 Nature of Relationship. Each Participating TO shall enter into
More informationCalifornia Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff
Table of Contents 36. Congestion Revenue Rights... 3 36.1 Overview Of CRRs And Procurement Of CRRs... 3 36.2 Types Of CRR Instruments... 3 36.2.1 CRR Obligations... 3 36.2.2 CRR Options... 3 36.2.3 Point-To-Point
More informationEU Capacity Regulations Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures
Stage 02: Workgroup Report At what stage is this document in the process? : EU Capacity Regulations Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures This modification seeks to facilitate
More informationZambia Renewable Feed-in Tariff (REFIT) Program. Grid Connection Guidelines
Zambia Renewable Feed-in Tariff (REFIT) Program Grid Connection Guidelines February, 2016 Submitted by: USAID Southern Africa Trade Hub / AECOM International Development Submitted to: USAID/Southern Africa
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL POR ENERGY
Ref. Ares(2013)355201-15/03/2013 m EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL POR ENERGY Directorate В - Internal Energy Market Acting Director Brussels, 15 March 2013 ENER B/JPATH/os s(2013)410004 ACER The
More informationTHE TRANS-EUROPEAN AUTOMATED REAL-TIME GROSS SETTLEMENT EXPRESS TRANSFER SYSTEM
THE TRANS-EUROPEAN AUTOMATED REAL-TIME GROSS SETTLEMENT EXPRESS TRANSFER SYSTEM p.14 How will gain to TARGET? Access to a national RTGS system will mean to TARGET Multiple points 2 Published by: European
More informationFTR Trading Information Pack February 2018
FTR Trading Information Pack February 2018 Moyle and East West Interconnectors 20 th February 2018 Version 2.2 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. I-SEM and The Forwards Electricity Market... 5 2.1 New market
More informationThird Progress Report. on the. TARGET Project
Third Progress Report on the TARGET Project November 1998 European Central Bank, 1998 Postfach 16 03 19, D-60066 Frankfurt am Main All rights reserved. Photocopying for educational and non-commercial purposes
More information