RESPONSE TO ACER'S CONSULTATION ON TARIFFS
|
|
- Gregory Richardson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RESPONSE TO ACER'S CONSULTATION ON TARIFFS Question 1: What other issues should be dealt with in this Framework Guideline? What is the evidence for including these issues? Please provide justification. Eurogas does not see other issues, for the time being, to be tackled in this Framework Guidelines. As discussions will progress, other topics may be identified. However, the different options presented in the ACER document indicate several variables available for tariff setting. Therefore Eurogas would suggest that users have to be informed of changes in variables at an agreed period in advance of the gas year. Such guidance may be suitable for addressing in the Framework Guideline. Question 2: What are the most important problems that relate to tariff structures? Do the problems identified by you relate to the lack of harmonised approaches? The most important problems that relate to tariff structures are: - To meet the challenge to delivering long term investment (because the gas industry is a long term and capital intensive industry) - To avoid cross-subsidies between network users (between cross-border flow and national end-customers consumption, or between network users booking capacity products of different lengths.) - To be cost reflective - To set tariffs (cost allocation to connection points) which will support the gas flow between markets (i.e. avoiding pancaking) - To avoid unnecessarily complex tariff structures. These issues are not necessarily all related to a lack of harmonisation of detailed tariff structures. Question 3: Based on the Gas Regulation, are there further principles to be added? As expressed many times during the drafting of the network code on capacity allocation mechanisms, shippers would like a mechanism that gives the TSO a signal for building incremental capacity. It has not been done in the CAM NC and is out of the scope of the FG on tariffs (in Even though incentives, remuneration determination and potential mechanisms for releasing incremental capacity are outside the scope of the FG on harmonised tariff structure, it is clear that tariff setting and efficient investments should be compatible ). Eurogas stresses again that such a mechanism is needed to promote / develop long term investments. Question 4: How would you interpret the above principles and objectives? Which objective would you consider to be the most important for achieving an EU internal market for gas? How would you rank the rest of the objectives? Please provide justification. As expressed in our response to question 2, Eurogas most important objectives are: Promote new and efficient investments Achieve efficient gas trade and competition especially tarification that supports crossborder flows 12NO244 Page 1 of 6
2 Avoid cross-subsidies and undue discrimination between network users Establish cost-reflective tariffs and ensure recovery of allowed revenues These topics will be affected by the CAM NC and especially the generalization of auctions at all the Interconnection Points and by the discussion about the reserve price of these auctions in this FG on tariffs Transparency in line with the Third Package is essential for underpinning the good functioning of the market. Depending on the level of harmonization eventually decided on in the Code, an appropriate level of transparency related to tariff methodology and application may have to be developed; Question 5: What are your views on the proposed scope and application regarding: -Entry and exit points Eurogas requires further explanations and analysis on the reasons the extension to LNG terminals and storage is under consideration, and agrees it is important first to understand potential advantages and disadvantages. Both terminals and storage raise complex issues that require to be taken into account. The starting points in approaching the question should be non-discrimination, cost-reflectivity, and a pragmatic approach. Consideration of LNG terminals should also take into account wider supply related issues, that their inclusion may have an adverse impact on the costs of Europe s terminals, thus weakening of European gas markets the attractiveness Therefore this question requires further analysis before there is the possibility of a final position. Clarifications on which provisions ACER would extend to other entry-exit points would prove very helpful for Eurogas in analyzing this issue further. -Determination of the annual reference price Eurogas agrees with ACER that the annual regulated tariff should be used as a reference to determine reserve prices in auction for firm, interruptible and backhaul capacity for the various short and long-term products. This will help to avoid unnecessary complexity. -Mechanisms to deal with over- and under-recovery of allowed revenues and the definition of the clearing price? Please justify your answer. Eurogas requires further evidence and clarification on which different mechanisms ACER has in mind and their different impacts. Comments below are preliminary. A commodity charge should be avoided as a mechanism to deal with over- and under-recovery since there it would involve a great risk of cross subsidies. For sake of clarification, Eurogas is not objecting to all current systems of having a commodity charge as a tarification tool (like for example in Italy, where the tariff is the sum of capacity charges and a commodity charge which is used to recover the operational costs of the TSO ). This tool does not seem adequate to deal with over- and under- recovery as in Britain. Additional fee by unit of capacity seems the more neutral measure if it means that the reserve price changes each year to take into account over or under recovery. Nevertheless it would be helpful if in its impact assessment, ACER could provide further evidence and clarification on how different mechanisms could work, and their different impacts. Eurogas would be opposed to any change of past tariffs. Any over- and under-recovery should be taken into account in the next tariff (i.e. no retroactivity or no adjustment to the past invoices). 12NO244 Page 2 of 6
3 Question 6: Regarding the issue of compensation payments between TSOs within cross-national entry-exit zones, do you consider that: ii. The rules establishing compensation payments should be harmonised at EU level. iii. Guidelines of good practice on the issue would suffice. Please provide guidelines suggestions. iv. Other option: Eurogas has to develop a position on this issue and will follow with interest the views of TSOs and NRAs. Question 7: Do you agree that reserve prices shall be based on reference prices as described above? As a first thought, reserve prices should perhaps be based on option 2 Actual costs incurred (i.e. based on CAPEX and OPEX). Nevertheless, before concluding on this topic, Eurogas members unfamiliar with LRMC-based approaches would like to have a better understanding of how option 1 (Long Run Marginal Cost) works. A general principle to keep in mind in the definition of reference price should be efficiency. Question 8: Which option would you find appropriate to determine the reference price? Please justify your answer. Option 2 seems suitable because it should secure TSO s investments (i.e. cost will be recovered) and therefore reassure network users that they are only paying for what they use. Question 9: Regarding the cost concepts, do you consider that: iii. Guidelines of good practice would suffice, along the following line: iv. Other option: ii. The rules should be harmonised within the cost concept of option 2 and along the following lines : - TSO s revenues due to cross-border flow should be proportionate to the grid cost needed to allow this flow (i.e. the responsible party pays principle) avoiding then cross-subsidies. Economy of scale should be shared between cross-border and domestic consumption. - There should not be cross subsidies between shippers booking underground storage (for their end-customers) and the others, which argues for seasonal reserve prices (see 16). Question 10: Could two different cost concepts be applied on the two sides of an interconnection point without hindering cross-border trade? Please justify your answer. Before concluding on this topic, Eurogas needs to have a better understanding of how option 1 (Long Run Marginal Cost) works. 12NO244 Page 3 of 6
4 Question 11: Regarding the issue of cost allocation, do you consider that: ii. Methodologies for allocating a TSO s costs between cross-border and domestic usage should be harmonised across Europe. iii. Methodologies for allocating a TSO s costs between cross-border and domestic usage should be established on a more local basis, in combination with guidelines of good practice. iv. Are there any other ways of allocating the TSO s costs in a harmonised or local way which should be considered, focusing on the allocation of costs between crossborder and domestic usage? v. If cost allocation methodologies are to be set on a local basis, do you agree with the criteria set out above for assessing the methodologies? ii. Methodologies for allocating a TSO s costs between cross-border and domestic usage should be harmonised across Europe. Nevertheless, Eurogas needs more time to understand all the cost allocation methodologies given as examples. It is, therefore, very difficult to give a view on that theoretical issue, at this stage. Question 12: Do you consider potential cross-subsidies as a concern in relation to the coexistence of different cost allocation methodologies? Please provide justification. It may, indeed, hinder cost-reflectivity if for example one NRA were to choose an Individual cost-based approach and the adjacent NRA an Equalisation approach; some routes would in effect subsidise others. Question 13: Regarding the issue of reserve prices for short term products, do you consider that: iii. Guidelines of good practice would suffice, along the following line : iv. Other option: ii. Among Eurogas members, there are strong reservations about Options 2 and 3. The first main thoughts of Eurogas are that the rules should be harmonised, along the following lines: - Either on option 1 pricing short-term proportionally to the yearly reference price - Or on option 4 pricing with multipliers higher than one for short-term products - Seasonal factors may have to be taken into consideration in both solutions (but see 16) Eurogas will analyze this issue further. Question 14: What are your views on the proposed policy options? Would you suggest other options? Please provide your reasons. Eurogas is not suggesting other options. Question 15: What are in your view the advantages/disadvantages of each of the options? Arguments in favour of Option 1 or 4 are that they will incentivize long term booking. Perceived disadvantages of using the GB model with discount for short term booking are 12NO244 Page 4 of 6
5 because that it will undermine long term booking and therefore investment. Furthermore, it has increased National Grid under-recovery which has led to a variable and increasing commodity charge. This last measure penalizes long term booking because it subsidizes short term booking. Indeed, short term shippers buy cheaper capacity which leads to charges on all the network users with a commodity charge! Question 16: Should seasonal factors be applied? This is a complex issue, and is closely related to the designs of current national systems, and to what extent a harmonized approach will penetrate these. Nevertheless, Eurogas needs a further analysis on the degree of elasticity of capacity demand to have a final view on the use of seasonality factors, and if they would lead to cross-subsidies. The analysis should also reflect on what solution would best suit the European market. Question 17: Regarding the issue of reserve prices for interruptible and non-physical backhaul capacity, do you consider that: iii. Guidelines of good practice would suffice, along the following line: iv. Other option: - Interruptible capacity should be priced at a discount in relation to the corresponding firm capacity service (option 1) Reserve prices for interruptible and non-physical backhaul capacity should not undermine the firm secondary capacity market and, at the same time, the attractiveness for TSO to offer interruptible capacity. That is why option 2 zero reserve price could be problematic in its effects. Question 18: Would you suggest other options? No. Question 19: What are your views on the proposed policy options? Would you prefer one option over the other? To what extent can this preferred option be uniformly applied? Please explain. Option 1 Regulated tariff plus fixed auction premium should be implemented within the European Union. Option 2 and 3 automatically inflated prices would not be suitable because inflation is already commonly taken into account during TSO and NRA negotiation on the TSO s revenues (e.g. in the return rate of the CAPEX and the evolution of the OPEX). Option 4, clearing price, could have been a solution but this would entail higher over- or under-recovery and, therefore, it appears to be more problematic in its effects. Question 20: Do you consider that different approaches could be applied for one bundled capacity product? No, option 1 should apply at each IP and at each part/side of a IP. 12NO244 Page 5 of 6
6 Question 21: Regarding the issue of recovery of allowed revenues, do you consider that: i. No harmonisation in required. ii. The rules establishing this relation should be harmonised at EU level. Please provide harmonisation suggestions. iii. Guidelines of good practice on the issue would suffice. Please provide guideline suggestions. iv. Other option: ii. The rules establishing this relation should be harmonised at EU level based on option 1 Recovery of allowed revenues through a regulatory account. This account will be a factor in the calculation of the next tariff, then consistent with our response to question 19. Question 22: Should there be a cap on the percentage of revenues to be recovered through a commodity charge? If so, then please provide proposals for how this could work in practice. Eurogas refers to its answer to Question 5 on mechanisms to deal with over- and under recovery of allowed revenues. When ACER mentions commodity charge, it should clarify which type. A commodity charge should not be put in place to deal with over- or under recovery. Of course, this does not mean that a commodity charge could not be part of existing tarification for example to recover TSOs OPEX. But a socialization of the tariff burden should be avoided as far as possible; capacity- and commodity- based tariff components can still coexist, but not to deal with under recovery leading to a socialization of the tariff burden. We also invite any further suggestion you may have concerning the Framework Guidelines on harmonised transmission tariff structures relating to issues which are either not considered in the scoping document or mentioned but not considered for further analysis. Please reason your answer. It is evident that the issue of harmonized tariffs raises very complex issues. The above remarks reflect a first consideration by Eurogas, but until further high-quality analysis is available on some key aspects, few definite opinions are offered. Eurogas, however, would urge that in approaching the complexities, the underlying question should always be what is good for the European market. Eurogas supports the objective of efficient use and access to the system and criteria of non-discrimination, cost-reflectivity, avoidance of market distortion, and also urges pragmatism. 12NO244 Page 6 of 6
Scope and policy options for Framework Guidelines on Harmonised transmission tariff structures. -Public Hearing -
Contact Details (as instructed): Name Ana Pinto/Mikel Amundarain Company EDP Gás/Naturgás Energia Comercializadora Contact email Anateixeira.pinto@edp.pt/mikel.amundarain@naturgasenergia.com Phone +351
More informationWe appreciate your feedback
Publishing date: 05/09/2012 Document title: We appreciate your feedback Please click on the icon to take a 5 online survey and provide your feedback about this document ACER Public Consultation on Scope
More informationWe appreciate your feedback
Publishing date: 05/09/2012 Document title: We appreciate your feedback Please click on the icon to take a 5 online survey and provide your feedback about this document Draft Framework Guidelines on rules
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL POR ENERGY
Ref. Ares(2013)355201-15/03/2013 m EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL POR ENERGY Directorate В - Internal Energy Market Acting Director Brussels, 15 March 2013 ENER B/JPATH/os s(2013)410004 ACER The
More informationACER Consultation Template. Tariff NC Article 26(5)
ACER Consultation Template Tariff NC 26(5) The following document constitutes support material for the online template created by the Agency for the Coordination of Energy Regulators ( the Agency) for
More informationAnalysis of Cross Border Transmission Gas Tariffs between Portugal and Spain. - Public Hearing -
Analysis of Cross Border Transmission Gas Tariffs between Portugal and Spain - Public Hearing - - EDP Gás and Naturgas Energia Comercializadora Comments EDP Gás and Naturgás Energia, both shipper companies
More informationGas Target Model Follow up - CEER Work on Incremental Capacity
Gas Target Model Follow up - CEER Work on Incremental Capacity Stefanie Neveling, GWG Vice-Chair Benoit Esnault, TF Co-Chair 21 st Madrid Forum 22-23 March 2012 Background GTM took on task how to identify
More informationType of change. Licence (RIIO-T2)
GCR Decisions List Key: Red Amber Green No proposed/discussed conclusion or a lot of work remains on this issue Issue discussed and open Proposal agreed Item Reference Price Methodology Auction Structure
More informationEuropean Workgroup. European Workgroup 3 rd April 2014
European Workgroup Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. European Workgroup 3 rd
More information20 December Fluxys Belgium SA
Publication of information according to Article 30 (1) (b) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/460 of 16 March 2017 establishing a network code on harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas 20 December
More informationGas Market Modelling for the Quo Vadis Project 26 July, Budapest, Hungary. Memo on the Q&A session of the Workshop
Gas Market Modelling for the Quo Vadis Project 26 July, Budapest, Hungary Memo on the Q&A session of the Workshop Summary During the workshop, the European Gas Market Model (EGMM) was introduced to the
More informationVision Paper LT UIOLI
Vision Paper LT UIOLI 1 / 10 1 Introduction The CMP Guidelines 1 introduced new and more detailed obligations on transmission system operators (TSOs) and National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) regarding
More informationTariff for Virtual Reverse Flow Product at Moffat
Tariff for Virtual Reverse Flow Product at Moffat DOCUMENT TYPE: REFERENCE: DATE PUBLISHED: FURTHER INFORMATION: Decision Paper CER/11/190 11 th November 2011 cjohnston@cer.ie The Commission for Energy
More informationAustrian Power Grid Comments to ACER consultation
Austrian Power Grid Comments to ACER consultation Austrian Power Grid (APG) welcomes the invitation to respond to the Public Consultation on Assessment of the Annual Cross-Border Infrastructure Compensation
More information3 rd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes
3 rd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes Regulatory Framework & Incentives for Infrastructure Development Sergio Ascari VIS Consultants Gas Advisor, Florence School
More informationERGEG Public Consultation on Guidelines on Transmission Tarification 1. - Evaluation of the Comments Received
ERGEG Public Consultation on Guidelines on Transmission Tarification 1 - Evaluation of the Comments Received - 18-07-2005 INTRODUCTION This document contains the evaluation by ERGEG of the comments received
More informationACER. The Director. Ljubljana, 1 8 March 2015 ACER-AP-DH-ss Mr. Malcolm Webb CEO, Oil and Gas UK
ACER Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators The Director Ljubljana, 1 8 March 2015 ACER-AP-DH-ss-20 15-148 Mr. Malcolm Webb CEO, Oil and Gas UK mwebb@oilandgasuk.co.uk Mr. David Cox Managing Director,
More informationComments on CEPA s draft conclusions in relation to European transmission tariffs
July 2015 Frontier Economics 1 ACER commissioned CEPA to review harmonisation of transmission tariffs in Europe, and specifically to: assess whether increased harmonisation of electricity transmission
More informationView on the perspective on Regional Gas Market Development in Eastern Baltic Region
View on the perspective on Regional Gas Market Development in Eastern Baltic Region Saulius Bilys General Manager of AB Amber Grid Baltic Gas Market Mini Forum 2 May 2016, Vilnius Vision 2020 Based on
More information1.4. In accordance with paragraph 4 of Article 17, the decision is made on a case by case basis by the NRAs of the concerned Member States.
Final Joint Opinion of the Commission de regulation de l énergie (France) and the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (Great Britain) on ElecLink s exemption request under article 17 of Regulation EC
More informationThe Model of Implicit Capacity Allocation in the Baltic States
The Model of Implicit Capacity Allocation in the Baltic States This document describes a model of implicit allocation of gas transmission capacity in the Baltic States. Implicit capacity allocation is
More informationEU Capacity Regulations Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures
Stage 02: Workgroup Report At what stage is this document in the process? : EU Capacity Regulations Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures This modification seeks to facilitate
More informationUNC 0680: UNC Changes as a Consequence of no deal United Kingdom Exit from the European Union. UNC Modification
UNC Modification At what stage is this document in the process? UNC 0680: UNC Changes as a Consequence of no deal United Kingdom Exit from the European Union Purpose of Modification: A number of minor
More informationEVALUATION OF INVESTMENTS IN ELECTRICITY AND GAS TRANSMISSION NETWORKS
Unofficial English version Methodology and criteria for evaluating investments in electricity and gas infrastructure projects (article 13(6) of Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and
More informationACER Workshop on Gas Tariffs and Incremental Capacity
ACER Workshop on Gas Tariffs and Incremental Capacity Brussels/Ljubljana TITRE 3/9/2013 1 Opening remarks & organisation of the workshop Introduction Walter BOLTZ ACER BoR Vice-Chair and AGWG Chair Workshop
More informationNON-COMMERCIAL SERVICE OBLIGATIONS AND LIBERALIZATION HUNGARY 8-Oct-2003
NON-COMMERCIAL SERVICE OBLIGATIONS AND LIBERALIZATION HUNGARY 8-Oct-2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIVERSAL SERVICE OBLIGATIONS...2 1. The definition of USO...2 1.1. Telecommunications...2 1.2. Energy sector...3
More information29 June 2016 Disclaimer This explanatory document is submitted by all TSOs to all NRAs for information and clarification purposes only accompanying the All TSOs proposal for methodology for congestion
More informationCID Methodology Explanatory note
29 June 2016 Disclaimer This explanatory document is submitted by all TSOs to all NRAs for information and clarification purposes only accompanying the All TSOs proposal for methodology for congestion
More informationThe Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
Issue 6.06.2 Revision ApprovedCons ultation Draft The Entry Substitution Methodology Statement Effective from 27 th February1 st November 2015 Page 1 of 32 The Entry Substitution Methodology Statement
More informationThe Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
Issue 5.26.1 Revision Informal Consultation Draft The Entry Substitution Methodology Statement Effective from 2 nd February1 st September 2015 Page 1 of 31 ENTRY CAPACITY SUBSTITUTION METHODOLOGY STATEMENT
More information2 nd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes
2 nd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes Reviewing and Approving TYNDP A Regulatory Perspective Evangelos Penglis Partner, VIS Economic & Energy Consultants 08/12/2017
More informationEuropean transmission tariff structures Cambridge Economic Policy Associates
European transmission tariff structures Cambridge Economic Policy Associates 24 March 2015 Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (CEPA) We are an economic and financial policy consulting business Our energy
More informationAPPROVAL BY ALL CONCERNED CCR HANSA AUTHORITIES
APPROVAL BY ALL CONCERNED CCR HANSA AUTHORITIES OF CCR HANSA TSO PROPOSAL FOR CCR HANSA REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO HARMONISED ALLOCATION RULES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 52 OF THE COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
More informationGas Networks Ireland Allowed Revenue and Transmission Tariffs 2017/18 Decision Paper
Gas Networks Ireland Allowed Revenue and Transmission Tariffs 2017/18 Decision Paper Reference: CER/17/275 Date Published: 30/08/2017 Queries to: Daniel Ward dward@cer.ie Public Impact Statement Gas Networks
More informationUNC 0686 (Urgent): Removal of the NTS Optional Commodity Rate with adequate notice. UNC Modification
UNC Modification At what stage is this document in the process? UNC 0686 (Urgent): Removal of the NTS Optional Commodity Rate with adequate notice Purpose of Modification: Removal of the NTS Optional Commodity
More informationEntry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
Issue Revision 7.0 Approved Entry Substitution Methodology Statement Effective from 1 st November 2015 Page 1 of 30 ENTRY CAPACITY SUBSTITUTION METHODOLOGY STATEMENT Document Revision History Version/
More informationEuropean Update. 5 January 2017
European Update 5 January 2017 1. General Update 2 Code Status Update Code Current Status Implementation date CAM amendments Incremental Capacity EP/Council Scrutiny UNC MOD 598 raised EP/Council Scrutiny
More informationEU Harmonisation of Maintenance Publications at Interconnections Points
EU Harmonisation of Maintenance Publications at Interconnections Points Provision of Maintenance Information at Interconnection Points - EU Harmonisation Background: European Regulation EC 715/2009 puts
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 6.5.2009 SEC(2009)642 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER Commission staff working document on Article 22 of Directive 2003/55/EC concerning common rules
More informationNOTE OF DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT ON DIRECTIVES 2003/54-55 AND REGULATION 1228\03 IN THE ELECTRICITY AND GAS INTERNAL MARKET
NOTE OF DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT ON DIRECTIVES 2003/54-55 AND REGULATION 1228\03 IN THE ELECTRICITY AND GAS INTERNAL MARKET THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT BINDING ON THE COMMISSION EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS
More informationENTSO-E recommendations for Market Design Trilogue negotiations
ENTSO-E recommendations for Market Design Trilogue negotiations ENTSO-E congratulates the Bulgarian Presidency, the European Parliament and the European Commission on the successful conclusion of the first
More informationInterconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Methodology related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code March 2018
Interconnector (UK) Limited Charging Methodology related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code March 2018 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Background... 2 1.2 Units... 2 2 Capacity Prices... 3 2.1 General
More informationSecurity of Supply. Walter Boltz. 8 th EU/US Roundtable. CEER Vice President, Gas Working Group Chair October 2010, Berlin
Security of Supply Walter Boltz CEER Vice President, Gas Working Group Chair 8 th EU/US Roundtable 25-27 October 2010, Berlin Agenda Framework for Investment Planning and Security of Supply in the European
More informationGrid Investments from a Nordic Perspective
Grid Investments from a Nordic Perspective NordREG recommendations 1 Background and task As one of the challenges for the further development of the Nordic electricity market has in the last few years
More informationBrexit: potential impacts on energy markets and regulation
Brexit: potential impacts on energy markets and regulation November 2016 Overview This briefing note reviews the possible impacts of the UK s Brexit vote on energy regulation in the UK, in two scenarios:
More informationTekes preliminary comments on the first draft of the General Block Exemption Regulation (published 8th of May 2013)
1 Tekes preliminary comments on the first draft of the General Block Exemption Regulation (published 8th of May 2013) This document contains Tekes comments on the first draft of the General Block Exemption
More informationFORTUMS RESPONSE TO ACER CONSULTATION ON FORWARD RISK-HEDGING PRODUCTS AND HARMONISATION OF LONG-TERM CAPACITY ALLOCATION RULES
1 (5) FORTUMS RESPONSE TO ACER CONSULTATION ON FORWARD RISK-HEDGING PRODUCTS AND HARMONISATION OF LONG-TERM CAPACITY ALLOCATION RULES General comments Fortum welcomes the consultation by ACER on Forward
More informationEFET Proposal on Regional Independent System Operator (R_ISO) A CEER Response Paper
EFET Proposal on Regional Independent System Operator (R_ISO) A CEER Response Paper Ref. C08-GWG-42-03 6 February 2008 Council of European Energy Regulators ASBL 28 rue le Titien, 1000 Bruxelles Arrondissement
More informationEAI Response to ACER Consultation on Forward Risk-Hedging Products and Harmonisation of Long-Term Capacity Allocation Rules
Version 1.0 ACER Consultation on Forward Risk-Hedging Products and Harmonisation of Long-Term Capacity Allocation Rules EAI Response to ACER Consultation on Forward Risk-Hedging Products and Harmonisation
More information***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0379(COD)
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2016/0379(COD) 16.6.2017 ***I DRAFT REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the
More informationANNEX B: Proposed changes to IUK s Charging Methodology (marked version compared to the current approved version) Interconnector (UK) Limited
Interconnector (UK) Limited Charging Methodology related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code March 2018 October 2018 1 Introduction... 2 1.1 Background... 2 1.2 Units... 3 2 Capacity Prices...
More informationWholesale Electricity Market Monitoring Report for the Energy Community Contracting Parties and Georgia
Wholesale Electricity Market Monitoring Report for the Energy Community Contracting Parties and Georgia Reporting Period 2014 Publication date April 2016 Contents Contents... 1 List of Tables... 2 List
More informationEUROPEANISSUERS COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL OF A DIRECTIVE AMENDING THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE AND BACKGROUND DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
EUROPEANISSUERS COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL OF A DIRECTIVE AMENDING THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE AND BACKGROUND DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Position 12 March 2009 EuropeanIssuers fully support this initiative
More informationHow to get connected to our natural gas transmission system. LNG terminals and underground storage facilities
How to get connected to our natural gas transmission system LNG terminals and underground storage facilities Page 2 of 10 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 2 COMMERCIAL AND CONTRACTUAL PROCEDURE FOR CONNECTING
More informationPresent: Philippe de LADOUCETTE, President, Olivier CHALLAN BELVAL, Hélène GASSIN and Jean- Pierre SOTURA, Commissioners.
Deliberation Deliberation of the French Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) of 27 th June 2013 deciding on the rules for the implementation of the Annex I to Regulation (EC) n 715/2009 on the Congestion
More informationEuropean Update. 1 st October 2015
European Update Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. 1 st October 2015 1. General
More informationObject: Technical and market design improvements urgently required for XBID go-live
To: Klaus-Dieter Borchardt Director for the Internal Energy Market, European Commission, DG Energy Cc: Alberto Pototschnig Director, ACER Cosimo Campidoglio Director for Market Monitoring, Analysis and
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
24.9.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 250/5 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 838/2010 of 23 September 2010 on laying down guidelines relating to the inter-transmission system operator compensation
More informationLink to the simplified model Parameters applied for the simplified model:
Annex 2: Transparency information according to NC TAR NC TAR According to Article 30 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/460 of 16 March 2017 establishing a network code on harmonised transmission tariff
More informationIntroduction. 1.1 The CACM Regulation & all TSOs. 1.2 Geographical application of this proposal
Explanatory Document to all TSOs proposal for intraday cross-zonal gate opening and gate closure times in accordance with Article 59 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing
More informationWe appreciate your feedback
Publishing date: 29/08/2012 Document title: We appreciate your feedback Please click on the icon to take a 5 online survey and provide your feedback about this document Forward Risk-Hedging Products and
More informationViviane Illegems European Market Integration
Introduction of the allocation of Financial Transmission Rights (FTRs) Options instead of Physical Transmission Rights with UIOSI (Use It or Sell It) for long term transmission rights on Belgian Borders
More information7 April ENTSO-E AISBL Avenue de Cortenbergh Brussels Belgium Tel Fax www. entsoe.
All TSOs Proposal for a Congestion Income Distribution (CID) methodology in accordance with Article 73 of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a Guideline on Capacity Allocation
More informationTable of Contents List of Figures...3 List of Tables...3 Definitions and Abbreviations...4 Introduction...7
Explanatory document to all TSOs proposal for a methodology for the TSO-TSO settlement rules for the intended exchange of energy in accordance with Article 50(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195
More informationHarmonised Allocation Rules for Forward Capacity Allocation Summary of the assessment of the comments from the public consultation
Harmonised Allocation Rules for Forward Capacity Allocation Summary of the assessment of the comments from the public 29 June 2016 Disclaimer This explanatory document is submitted by the relevant TSOs
More informationDraft Outline of the 2019 Work Programme
Draft Outline of the 2019 Work Programme This document presents an outline of the tasks the Agency plans to perform in 2019. As such, it focuses primarily on the external deliverables the Agency expects
More informationAddressing under-allocation of flows from BBL arising from misalignment of reference conditions
Stage 01: Modification 0560 Urgent: Addressing under-allocation of flows from BBL arising from misalignment of reference conditions At what stage is this document in the process? 01 Modification 02 03
More informationIntraday Cross-Zonal Gate Opening and Gate Closure Times. Consultation document. PC_2018_E_01 9 January 2018
Consultation document PC_2018_E_01 9 January 2018 Trg republike 3 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia T: +386 (0)8 2053 400 info@acer.europa.eu www.acer.europa.eu This consultation document is issued to invite comments
More informationDraft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, C(2010) XXX final Draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No / of on laying down guidelines relating to the inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanism and
More informationHub-Based Gas Sourcing for Market Liquidity and Continuity of Supply
Hub-Based Gas Sourcing for Market Liquidity and Continuity of Supply 1 st AIEE Energy Symposium Current and Future Challenges to Energy Security Bicocca University, Milano November 30 December 2, 2016
More informationNetwork Code on Forward Capacity Allocation
Network Code on Forward Capacity Allocation Summary of changes from preliminary version (12/11/12) to 1st Draft version (17/01/13) Article Nr. OLD version Article Nr. NEW version Change 1 1 1.1. Replaced
More informationImpact of the storage obligation on trading and market development in Poland
Amstelveenseweg 998 1081 JS Amsterdam Phone: + 31 20 520 7970 Attn: Mrs. Aldona Kaźmierska Vice-Director Department of Markets Development and Consumer Issues URE, Urzad Regulacji Energetyki Ul. Chłodna
More informationCAM Modification 500. CAM-CMP Development Workgroup 2
CAM Modification 500 CAM-CMP Development Workgroup 2 CMP processes - CMP/CAM interaction TSO oversell Oversubscription and Buyback (Risk & reward) TSO buyback TSO Additional capacity Unsold Technical capacity
More informationEU Codes Legal Roadmap
EU Codes Legal Roadmap 1 Purpose 1.1 This note outlines the legal steps leading up to and following 1 October 2015 to implement the respective EU Codes and Guidelines, which comprise so far: Commission
More informationOpen seasons between France and neighboring countries
1 Open seasons between France and neighboring countries Content Assessment of the market needs ERGEG guidelines related to Open Seasons Open Seasons & improvements France Germany France Belgium France
More informationEASEE-gas. European Association for the Streamlining of Energy Exchange gas
1 EASEE-gas European Association for the Streamlining of Energy Exchange gas Harmonised Gas Role Model Specification From the Business Process perspective Number: 2017-001/01.2 Subject: Harmonised gas
More informationGas Networks Ireland Transmission Tariffs and Tariff Information 2018/19
An Coimisiún um Rialáil Fóntas Commission for Regulation of Utilities Gas Networks Ireland Transmission Tariffs and Tariff Information 2018/19 Information Paper Information Paper Reference: CRU/18/179
More informationMethodology and criteria for evaluating investments in electricity and gas infrastructure projects (Article 13(6) Infrastructure Regulation 1 )
Methodology and criteria for evaluating investments in electricity and gas infrastructure projects (Article 13(6) Infrastructure Regulation 1 ) 1 Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 on guidelines for trans-european
More informationREALISEGRID. WP3 Final Workshop. Rome - 31 March TSO incentivization policies for cross-border transmission development
REALISEGRID WP3 Final Workshop Rome - 31 March 2011 TSO incentivization policies for cross-border transmission development WP3.6 ongoing results OME & RSE Outline Background Building cross-border interconnections
More informationFebruary February 2017 Page 1 of 12
Italian Borders TSOs/NEMOs Complementary Regional Auctions in accordance with Article 63 of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a Guideline on Capacity Allocation and
More informationEFET pan-european survey amongst energy traders about market distortions
EFET pan-european survey amongst energy traders about market distortions April 2007 European Federation of Energy Traders Peter STYLES Carmen OPREA Survey initiated in in January 2007 and completed in
More informationReview of the Shareholder Rights Directive
Review of the Shareholder Rights Directive Position of Better Finance for All (The European Federation of Financial Services Users) 27 October 2014 ID number in Transparency Register: 24633926420-79 Better
More informationDraft Outline of the 2016 Work Programme
Draft Outline of the 2016 Work Programme This document presents an outline of the tasks that the Agency plans to perform in 2016. As such, it focuses primarily on the external deliverables the Agency expects
More informationENTSO-E Network Code on Electricity Balancing
Annex II to Recommendation of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators No 03/2015 of 20 July 2015 on the Network Code on Electricity Balancing Proposed amendments to the Network Code ENTSO-E
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.12.2006 COM(2006) 824 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
More informationResponse to ENTSOE public consultation. Network Code on Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for. Electricity
Response to ENTSOE public consultation On Network Code on Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity 23 May 2012 EUROPEX Rue Montoyer 31 Bte 9 BE-1000 Brussels T. : +32 2 512 34 10 E.:
More information18 April 2016 Draft for consultation
All TSOs proposal for intraday cross-zonal gate opening and gate closure times in accordance with Article 59 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity
More informationAll NEMOs proposal for the price coupling algorithm and for the continuous trading matching algorithm, also incorporating TSO and NEMO proposals for
All NEMOs proposal for the price coupling algorithm and for the continuous trading matching algorithm, also incorporating TSO and NEMO proposals for a common set of requirements, in accordance with Article
More informationINTERNATIONAL COOPERATION TO LIMIT THE USE OF BORDER ADJUSTMENT
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION TO LIMIT THE USE OF BORDER ADJUSTMENT WORKSHOP SUMMARY SOUTH CENTER, GENEVA SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 Convened by: Climate Strategies aims to assist governments in solving the collective
More informationFichtner Management Consulting. Review of the Tariff Methodology in Water Supply. Extract. Tbilisi, February 18, 2016 I Dr Maria Belova, Nina Negic
Fichtner Management Consulting Review of the Tariff Methodology in Water Supply Extract Tbilisi, February 18, 2016 I Dr Maria Belova, Nina Negic Fichtner is one of the largest and best-known German independent
More information(7) This proposal is submitted for the approval of all National Regulatory Authorities (hereafter referred to as the NRAs ) of the CCR GRIT.
Regional Specific Annex for CCR Greece-Italy (GRIT) to the Harmonised Allocation Rules for long-term transmission rights in accordance with Article 52 of Commision Regulation (EU) 2016/1719 of 26 September
More information1 st Jul st Sept 2018 Unitary amount for distribution of annual auction premium North to. 1 st Jan st Mar 2018
Distribution of auction premiums on the North to South link and the VIP Pirineos from October 1 st 2017 to September 30 th 2018 Communication of the unitary amounts Following the deliberation of CRE dated
More informationIntegrated Single Electricity Market (I-SEM)
Integrated Single Electricity Market (I-SEM) Laura Brien, Director of Electricity Markets, CER Ibec Energy Conference Portlaoise Heritage Hotel 12 June 2014 Agenda The I-SEM Energy Trading Arrangements
More informationEBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA/RTS/2016/05 27 July 2016 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards on separation of payment card schemes and processing entities under Article 7 (6) of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 Contents Abbreviations
More informationDemand assessment report for incremental capacity between Polish gas transmission system and Lithuanian gas transmission system
Demand assessment report for incremental capacity between Polish gas transmission system and Lithuanian gas transmission system 2017-07-26 This report is a joint assessment of the potential for incremental
More informationEFET comments on the Open Season procedure. Dear Sir or Madam,
Gas Connect Austria GmbH Floridotower Floridsdorfer Hauptstraße 1 1210 Vienna Austria FGSZ Natural Gas Transmission Private Company Limited by Shares 8601 Siófok, Pf. 102 Hungary S.N.T.G.N TRANSGAZ S.A.
More informationWorkshop on Regional Electricity Trade and Market Development
Workshop on Regional Electricity Trade and Market Development Cross-border Electricity Trade and Tariffs April 23, 2014 Cross-border Electricity Trade (CBT) Flows within which part of the transmission
More informationRECORD OF THE CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS ON THE PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR SETTING ASIDE TRANSMISSION CAPACITY AT EVERY INTERCONNECTION POINT
NEWS FOR SHIPPERS RECORD OF THE CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS ON THE PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR SETTING ASIDE TRANSMISSION CAPACITY AT EVERY INTERCONNECTION POINT Further to a demand to rectify the reasons
More informationAPPROVAL BY ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AGREED AT THE ENERGY REGULATORS FORUM
APPROVAL BY ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AGREED AT THE ENERGY REGULATORS FORUM OF ALL TSO PROPOSAL FOR THE SINGLE ALLOCATION PLATFORM METHODOLOGY AND SAP COST SHARING METHODOLOGY 18 September 2017 1 I. Introduction
More informationRESPONSE TO THE CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF THE MIFID TRANSACTION REPORTING OBLIGATION
The Committee of European Securities Regulators 11-13 Avenue de Friedland F- 75008 Paris December 5, 2008 RESPONSE TO THE CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF THE MIFID TRANSACTION REPORTING
More information