PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Entered: June 2, 1983
|
|
- Joy Manning
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 x( ZASE NO E-GI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Entered: June 2, 1983 II - 7IRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, 3 corporation. Review of Fuel Costs of Virginia Electric and Power Company for the period October 1, 1982 through March 31, 1983, for the purpose of establishing a fuel increment in rates to be effective July 1, 1983 through December 31, HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDED DECISION PROCEDURE By order entered on December 30, 1982, in Case No E-GI, the 'ublic Service Commission approved a fuel cost recovery level for Virginia 3lectric and Power Company (VEPCO) of $ per kilowatt hour (after 3&0 tax adjustments) to reflect fuel costs at the meter level, to be zffective during the period January 1, 1983 through June 30, This represented a fuel recovery level of $ per kilowatt hour before :he E&O tax adjustment. By order issued on April 13, 1983, in the instant case, VEPCO was nade a respondent to this proceeding and was ordered to appear at a iearing to be held in the Commission's Hearing'Room on May 25, 1983, at vhich time and place VEPCO was to present information and evidence relating to its fuel and net energy costs during the period October 1, L982 through J4arcl.1 31, The purpose of the proceeding was to 2stablish a fuel increment to be included in VEPCO's rates for the period Suly 1, 1983 through December 31, Additionally, VEPCO was ordered 20 provide estimates of fuel costs for the application period. VEPCO vas ordered to give notice of the time and place of hearing by posting a :opy of the order and by publishing a copy of the order once at least :en days prior to May 25, 1983, in Greenbrier, Monroe, Pocahontas, Xaleigh and Summers Counties. The hearing was held as scheduled with Michael A. Albert appearing )n behalf of VEPCO, William Roberts of the Legal Division appearing on lehalf of Commission.Staff, and Billy Jack Gregg appearing on behalf of the Consumer Advocate Division. PUBLIC BB
2 Pursuant to an agreement entered into by the parties, the testimony filed by VEPCO on April 25, 1983 and all the exhibits attached thereto were stipulated into evidence with the exception of the testimony of S. P. Keck, who appeared at the hearing to present his testimony in order to provide an opportunity for the Consumer Advocate to cross- examine the witness. Sirnilarily, the testimony of the Staff witness was also stipulated into the record, along with the exhibits attached to thai testimony, At the hearing, the parties agreed on the record to a joint stipulation and agreement for settlement, which was confirmed through a written joint stipulation and agreement for settlement which was submitted to thc Hearing Examiner on May 27, 1983, and which has been placed into the record of this case. At the conclusion of the hearing on May 25, 1983, the matter was submitted for a decision, subject to the filing of the written stipulation. No party was to file briefs or proposed orders. EVIDENCE In its prefiled direct testimony and exhibits, filed on April 25, 1983, VEPCO had requested a total fuel recovery level of $ per kilowatt hour (after B&O tax adjustment) to replace the current fuel recovery level of $ per kilowatt hour, after B&O tax adjustment. VEPCO's request represented a decrease in the fuel increment of $ per kilowatt hour (after B&O tax adjustment). (Exhibit CMJ-A, p. 2). Included in the requested total fuel level was an adjustment of $ per kilowatt hour (including B&O tax adjustment) to account for an underrecovery of fuel expenses experienced by VEPCO during the October 1982 through March 1983 period. The Company had calculated an underrecovery for the six months ended March 1933 of $20,737 (Exhibit SBW-2). VEPCO pointed out that, since July, 1980, when the Commission initiated the six month fuel cost reviews for VEPCO, more than $1.3 million in fuel expense had not been recovered in West Virginia. As a result, VEPC( also requested that the Commission adopt deferred fuel accounting pro- cedures in order to keep over and underrecoveries in balance, (CMJ-A, P. 4). The testimony of Larry W. Ellis set forth the actual energy mix and associated system fuel expenses for October 1982 through March 1983 and the projected system energy mix and fuel expenses for the July,through c PUBLIC OF se I"hl mn m -2- CHAI)LLSTON
3 -~ ~~~ December 1983 period, as it did in VEPCO's last fuel review proceeding before the Commission. For the October 1982 through March 1983 period the system's energy mix was 39.9% nuclear generation, 42.9% fossil fuel generation and 15.4% purchase and interchange power. For the applicatior period, the system energy mix was projected to include 45.4% nuclear generation, 38.9% coal-fired generation, 6.7% heavy oil fired generation,.3% combustion turbine generation and 8.7% purchase and interchange power. The testimony of S. B. Watkins described how the fuel expense level was calculated and how it would be included in the Company's rates during the period July through December The estimated system fuel expense provided in Mr, Ellis's testimony was divided by the estimated system kilowatt hour sales for the application period, provided in the testimony of Mr. C. M. Jarvis, to calculate a fuel level of $ per kilowatt hour, excluding the tax adjustment, This amount is then multi- plied by the B&O tax factor of in order to derive the requested fuel level at meter. Mr. Watkins recommended that the proposed fuel level decrease requested by VEPCQ be placed into effect on the same date as the rate schedules approved by the Commission in VEPCO's pending general rate case, Case No E-42T, which rates will become effective on June 15, According to Mr. Watkins, this would give the customers the benefit of the proposed fuel decrease for an additional fifteen days and eliminate the need to change rates twice in the period between June 15 and July 1, Mr. M. S. Bolton, Jr., provided VEPCO's testimony concerning the actual fuel expenses incurred by the Company during the period October 1982 through March Mr. Bolton also testified in favor of the adoption of deferred fuel accounting, to insure the proper matching of fuel expenses and fuel revenues. According to Mr. Bolton, this procedurt would provide for full recovery of fuel expenses when incurred on an reasonable and prudent basis and any actual over or underrecovery could be corrected in a subsequent fuel proceeding. The Company requested that deferred fuel accounting be approved for use~by VEPCO beginning on July 1, The final witness whose testimony was entered into the record in this proceeding was S. P. Keck, the Supervisor of Fuel Economic Analysis in the Fuel Resources Department of VEPCO. Mr. Keck reviewed actual OF CHARLCSTON
4 delivered fossil fuel prices and actual nuclear fuel expense rates for the six month period ended March 31, 1983, and reviewed projected delivered fossil fuel prices and nuclear fuel expense rates for the six month period July through December According to Mr. Keck, VEPCO continues to supply its coal generating stations through contract and spot purchases. Six coal contracts were in effect during the six month period ended March 31, 1983, These contracts served the Rremo, Portsmout and Mt. Storm stations. The coal sapply for these stations is augmented by spot coal purchases. The Chesterfield and Possum Point stations are supplied exclusively by spot market purchases. Delivered coal prices continued to be generally lower than the forecasted prices for this period as a result of the prolonged economic recession, which has lowered the demand for coal. Additionally actual delivered prices were influenced by changes in rail freight rates, as a result of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 and a new agreement between VEPCO and CSX Corporation regarding in-system coal, which became effective on January 29, Actual delivered oil prices fell during the period ending March 1983 as a result of the continuing oil glut, conservation, the prolonged economic recession and the use of energy substitutes. The process for developing projected delivered fossil fuel prices includes information from VEPCO's fossil fuel price consultant; various publications relating to the coal and oil markets; key economic market indicators; VEPCO supply sources; and Company operational requirements as they relate to fuel type. The final projections are subject to unanticipated economic or political activity, either on a national or international scale, or deviations from Company-planned operations. The major considerations in forecasting coal prices are the Company's current and future contracts; projected spot coal market prices; coal rail freight rates; and the consumption patterns of the various coal- burning stations. Mr. Keck projects that delivered coal prices will show a small increase due to continued moderate inflation and an antici- pated modest rebound from the currently depressed state of the national economy. He forecasts that delivered oil prices are projected to remain relatively constant during the upcoming fuel period. The primary assumptions used to develop the projections for nuclear expenses for the application period are front-end costs, which are the direct and indirect costs for the initial purchase and fabrication of the nuclear fuel; OF CHARLESTON -4-
5 Westinghouse uranium litigation settlement credits; and rear-end costs, which are based on a present worth methodology for interim storage and which include a federal government charge for permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel in accordance with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of The only Staff witness whose testimony was stipulated into the record was David T. Carden of the Finance and Special Studies Division of the Commission. Mr. Carden's testimony supported a fuel recovery level of $ per kilowatt hour after B&O tax adjustments, or a fuel increment decrease of $ per kilowatt hour, after B&0 tax adjust- ments. The only difference between the Staff and Company recommendations is the elimination from the Staff calculation of the increment for past underrecoveries of $ per kilowatt hour, requested by VEPCO. Staff accepted the Company's projections of sources of power by fuel type generation for the six month period ending December 1983; cost per megawatt hour for the various sources, as well as the total dollar amounts; and total system and West Virginia sales projections. PJr. Carden noted that, for the application period, the Company was projecting that the projected cost per ton of coal from Laurel Run (VEPCO's mining subsidiary) will be lower than the projected cost per ton from Island Creek, therefore eliminating the need for repricing of the Laurel Run, or affiliated, coal costs. Staff will later audit the actual results and recommend any changes in future fuel review cases. Staff is opposed to the collection of any past under or over- recoveries; however, Staff, like VEPCO, recommends that deferred fuel accounting be approved for VEPCO, effective July 1, 1983, as has already been done by the Commission for Appalachian Power Company, Monongahela Power Company and The Potomac Edison Company. According to Mr. Carden this will permit adjustments for future under and overrecoveries of prudently incurred fuel expenses. Staff calculated the over and under- recoveries by months for the six month period ended 14arch 1983 and calculated a net underrecovery for that period of $10,899. between the Staff stated underrecovery and the Company's calculated underrecovery of $20,737 results from the repricing of Laurel Run production to the lesser of its own production costs or the price paid to Island Creek. The differenc As noted previously in this order, all of the parties to this case, including the Consumer Advocate Division, entered into a joint stipulatio I' PUBLIC se CHARLLSTON
6 and agreement for settlement. Under the terms of the joint stipulation, the parties agree that a resonable fuel recovery level to be approved in this case is $ per kilowatt hour (after B&O tax adjustment). This agreement is made without prejudice to the respective positions of the parties in subsequent cases regarding VEPCO on any issue contained in this case. The parties further agree and stipulate, after consideration of evidence received in this case and after consideration of Commission precedent in fuel review proceedings of other electric utilities, that beginning July 1, 1983, VEPCO should defer any prudently incurred fuel costs which vary from the level agreed upon in this case and that such deferred costs (whether over or underrecoveries) should be reflected in subsequent fuel review proceedings. The parties agree and stipulate tha the present record is sufficient and adequate to support the fairness, reasonableness and lawfulness of the agreed upon fuel recovery level and the adoption of deferred fuel accounting as set forth in the joint stipulation. DISCUSSION In any rate case in which the parties enter into a joint stipulatioi and agreement for settlement, it is the responsibility of the presiding Hearing Officer to insure that the joint stipulation represents a just and reasonable resolution of all of the issues contained within the case and constitutes a fair and equitable rate to be charged to a utility company's customers. In this case, the Hearing Examiner has thoroughly reviewed the evidence stipulated into the record, as well as Commission decisions in past VEPCO fuel review cases and fuel review cases involvin; other generating electric utilities in this jurisdiction. The Hearing Examiner is convinced that the joint stipulation and agreement for settlement entered into by the parties to this case represents a fair and reasonable resolution of the issues involved and should be adopted by the Examiner. The fuel review levels independently calculated by VEPCO and Commission Staff were precisely the same, with the exception of the adjustment for past underrecoveries requested by VEPCO. The Staff witness accepted as accurate the Company's projections of sales and fuel costs for the upcoming six month period, prior to the time that a stipu- lation was entered into by the parties. Considering the Commission's past decisions with regard to the appropriateness of including = adjustrents PUBLIC OF %E w mimm -6- CHARLESTON
7 -~ for under or overrecoveries in a fuel increment, it is very likely that absent the stipulation, the Staff recommendation would have been adopte in this case, which recommendation is the fuel increment stipulated to ' the parties. Additionally, the Hearing Examiner is of the opinion that deferred fuel accounting would likely have been adopted in this case, without the stipulation, since both Commission Staff and VEPCO recommen ed it and since there appears to be no good reason for denying to VEPCO a procedure approved by the Commission for use by the other three generating electric utilities operating in this jurisdiction. The result reached in the joint stipulation and agreement for settlement could have, and most likely would have, been reached by the Hearing Examiner absent a joint stipulation and agreement for settlement. Thus a fair and impartial review of the evidence and exhibits presented in this case independently supports and justifies the result contained within the joint stipulation and agreement for settlement. In its pre-filed testimony, VEPCO requested that it be permitted t place the fuel increment approved herein into effect at the same time that the Company implements any new rates which would result from its pending general rate case, Case No T. These rates will be effective on June 15, At the hearing held on May 25, 1983, Commi sion Staff and the Consumer Advocate Division indicated that they had n objection to this procecure. objection to this procedure. The Hearing Examiner likewise has no However, to implement the new fuel incre- ment on J'une 15, 1983, the parties will have to request a waiver of the 15-day exception period and 5-day Commission suspension period applicab to Hearing Examiners' Recommended Decisions, established in W. Va. Code Such a waiver may not be granted by a Hearing Examiner under the new policy established by the Commission in its April 29, 1983 orde in Case No T-D. Therefore, an appropriate joint motion must be filed by the parties to this case with the Commission in order to place the new fuel increment for VEPCO into effect prior to July 1, FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The independently calculated fuel increments submitted by VEP and Commission Staff in their pre-filed testimony were precisely the same with the exception of an adjustment for underrecoveries requested by VEPCO. (Staff Stipulated Exhibit DTC-A, p. 2). PUBLIC BE -7- CHARLEWON
8 .- 2. The Public Service Commission has approved the use of deferred fuel accounting for the three other generating electric utilities operating in this state (Staff Stipulated Exhibit DTC-A, p. 3). 3. The stipulated fuel recovery level, after BSGO taxes, of s per kilowatt hour is the same as the Staff recommended fuel recovery level contained in its pre-filed testimony (Staff Stipulated Exhibit DCC-A, p. 2; Joint Stipulation and Agreement for Settlement, p. 2) CONCLUSION OF LAW The fuel recovery level recommended in the joint stipulation and agreement for settlement of s p'er kilowatt hour after B&O taxes constitutes a just and reasonable fuel recovery level, which could be independently justified on the basis of the exhibits and testimony presented in this case and should be approved for use by VEPCO for the six month period beginning July 1, Additionally, the use of deferred fuel accounting should be approved for use by VEPCO effective July 1, 1983, as a reasonable way to account for future over and underrecoveries. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Virginia Electric and Power Company be permitted to include in its rates the amount of $ per kilowatt hour (after BSGO tax adjustment), or 1.987p5 per kilowatt hour, which reflects a fuel cost at meter level of $ per kilowatt hour. The fuel increment approved in this proceeding represents a $ per kilowatt hour decrease from the previously approved fuel recovery level effective for the period January 1 through June 30, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that beginning July 1, 1983, Virginia Electric and Power Company should defer any prudently incurred fuel costs which vary from the level agreed upon herein and that such deferred costs, whether over or underrecoveries, should be reflected in subsequent fuel review proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Company shall, within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry of this order, file revised tariff schedules incorporating therein the fuel increment approved in this proceeding. Such new tariff sheets shall contain the following language: The above rates include a fuel increment of per kilowatt hour. PUBLIC 6E CHARLESTON -8-
9 The Executive Secretary is hereby ordered to serve a copy of this order upon the Commission by hand delivery, and upon all parties of record by United States Certified Mail, return receipt requested. Leave is hereby granted to the parties to file written exceptions supported by a brief with the Executive Secretary of the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date this order is mailed. If excep- tions are filed, the parties filing exceptions shall certify to the Executive Secretary that all parties of record have been served said exceptions. If no exceptions are so filed this order shall become the order of the Commission, without further action or order, five (5) days following the expiration of the aforesaid fifteen (15) day time period, unless it is ordered stayed or postponed by the Commission. Any party may request waiver of the right to file exceptions to a Hearing Examiner's Recommended Decision by filink an appropriate petitior in writing with the Secretary. No such waiver will be effective until approved by order of the Commission, nor shall any such waiver operate to make any Hearing Examiner's Order or Decision the order of the Commission sooner than five (5) days after approval of such waiver by the Commission, unless the Commission likewise waives its statutory 5-day suspension period. Melissa K. Marland Hearing Examiner PUBLIC OF S ~ M 1 lnla N MKM:n= -9- CHARLLSTON
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA
II ENTERED 0.6. Rs-A p-,-* CHARLESTON CASE NO. 84-702-G-42T Entered: February 26, 1985 STANDARD GAS COMPANY, a corporation, Jane Lew, Lewis County. In the matter of increased rates and charges. ORIGINAIj
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. CHARLESTON Entered: March 27, 2001
ORIGINAL a ENTERED - O.B. Page PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Entered: March 27, 2001 30618alj032701.wpd M.C. CASE NO. 30618-00-19A TAXI, INC., doing business as GREENBRIER VALLEY
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Entered: October 31,2003 RECOMMENDED DECISION PROCEDURE
..., PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION y; ' *.:a t OF STATE VIRGINIA I, 3. + - AT ,-,i ------A Entered: October 31,2003 03 IlOIALJ103 103.wpd (-JR[[qr''. CASE NO. 03-1 101-W-MA CITY OF LOGAN,
More informationAt a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA in the City of Charleston on the 1 lth day of June, 2004.
03 1 174coma06 1 104.wpd At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA in the City of Charleston on the 1 lth day of June, 2004. CASE NO. 03-1 174-G-30C WEST VIRGINIA POWER GAS SERVICE,
More informationEntered: -_- May ?/L.---- PROCEDURE I_I- (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Commission"),
I_!$? fyl 48.- $l ' + B -; -* i ' j $ 5 CASE NO. 9380 P U BL I C S E RV I C E C OMM I S S IO N OF WEST VIRGINIA C HA R L E STO N Entered: -_- May.-.-- 10 1979?/L.---- THE CITY OF WELCH, a municipal corporation.
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON. At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COPllMISSION OF WEST PROCEDURE
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COPllMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA at the Capitol in the City of Charleston on the 17th day of June, 1977. CASE NO. 8639 WEST VIRGINIA
More informationVIRGINIA at the Capitol in the City of Charleston on the 17th day PROCEDURE. On June 9, 1976, West Virginia Water Company, a corporation,
I --- -7 1-1 "*a y &e*" PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CHARLES TON At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA at the Capitol in the City of Charleston on the 17th day of June, 1977. CASE
More informationOF WEST VIRGINIA PROCEDURE
i OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON I I Entered: July 26, 1985 M.C. CASE NO. 20886-AC WALLY REED'S ESSO, INC., a corporation, Morgantown, Monongalia County. Application for an amendment of certificate. HEARING
More informationDocket No U Docket No U FINAL ORDER
Docket No. 11884-U Docket No. 11821-U FINAL ORDER In re: Docket No. 11884-U: Application of Savannah Electric and Power Company to Increase the Fuel Cost Recovery Allowance Pursuant to O.C.G.A. 46-2-26
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON. Entered: August 13, 2010
CASE NO. 10-0672-SWF-PC Entered: August 13, 2010 FINAL 9/2/2010 ENVIROSOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC., and CAPELS LANDFILL, LLC, Application for exemption from requirements of W. Va. Code 24-2-12 or, alternatively,
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, NOVEMBER 23, APPLICATION OF Ml5 NOV 23 P 2-3<3 FINAL ORDER
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, NOVEMBER 23, 2015, Pr r _ ni APPLICATION OF Ml5 NOV 23 P 2-3
More information2003 Management s Discussion and Analysis
OGE Energy Corp. 2003 Management s Discussion and Analysis Appendix A to the Proxy statement Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Introduction OGE Energy
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Entered: September 24, 2004
~ --w Q!k?im--4,'"* _.-- PUBLC SERVCE COMMSSON =% OF WEST VRGNA C HAFtLE S TON Entered: September 24, 2004 040156alj092404.wpd \! 'l!.. COWEN PUBLC SERVCE DSTRCT Rule 19A application to increase water
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION : : : : ORDER
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Illinois Gas Company Proposed general increase in gas rates. By the Commission: I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY : : : : ORDER 98-0298 On November 19, 1997, Illinois
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON. Entered: December 18,20 18 RECOMMENDED DECISION
CASE NO. 18-0077-PWD- 19A PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Entered: December 18,20 18 BOOM-RALEIGH PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT, a public utility. Rule 19A application to increase water
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re Application of CONSUMERS ENERGY CO for Reconciliation of 2009 Costs. TES FILER CITY STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, UNPUBLISHED April 29, 2014 Appellant, v No. 305066
More informationPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATION INVOLVING INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STATES
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATION INVOLVING INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STATES 93 OPTIONAL ARBITRATION RULES INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STATES CONTENTS Introduction
More informationPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE PARTIES
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE PARTIES 119 OPTIONAL ARBITRATION RULES INT L ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE PARTIES CONTENTS Introduction
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON
ORDER NO. 07-573 ENTERED 12/21/07 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UE 188 In the Matter of PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Request for a rate increase in the company's Oregon annual revenues
More informationEnclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter.
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Jim Justice BOARD OF REVIEW Bill Crouch Governor 4190 West Washington Street Cabinet Secretary Charleston, WV
More informationSUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 437
SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. A bill to amend PA, entitled "An act to provide for the regulation and control of public and certain private utilities and other services affected with a public interest
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR ) PSC DOCKET NO. 06-284 A CHANGE IN NATURAL GAS BASE RATES ) (FILED
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. The Commission, on its own motion pursuant to KRS , hereby initiates
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: AN INVESTIGATION OF EAST KENTUCKY ) CASENO. POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. S NEED FOR ) 2010-00238 THE SMITH 1 GENERATING FACILITY
More informationARBITRATION RULES LJUBLJANA ARBITRATION RULES. Dispute Resolution Since 1928
ARBITRATION RULES Ljubljana Arbitration Centre AT the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia LJUBLJANA ARBITRATION RULES Dispute Resolution Since 1928 Ljubljana Arbitration Centre at the Chamber
More informationAttachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn
Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR
More informationPublic Service Commission. November 2,2015. Re: CASE NO E-P MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY and THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY
01 Brooks Street, P.0 Box 1 Charleston, West Virginla 33 Public Service Commission of West Virginia Phone (30) 300300 Fax (30) 3003 November,01 Ingrid Ferrell, Executive Secretary Public Service Commission
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON
Case No. 10-0699-E-42T APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY and WHEELING POWER COMPANY, both dba AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMMISSION ORDER ON THE APPLICATION FOR A RATE INCREASE. March 30,201 1 ~~ I. I1. I11. IV.
More informationUNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
Berkeley Journal of International Law Volume 4 Issue 2 Fall Article 14 1986 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Recommended Citation UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, 4 Int'l Tax & Bus. Law. 348 (1986). Link to publisher
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. DW Temporary and Permanent Rate Case
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DW 12-170 Temporary and Permanent Rate Case Request for Financing Approval HAMPSTEAD AREA WATER COMPANY, INC. Order Approving Settlement Agreement on
More informationCouncil Agenda Report
Agenda Item #6.3. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE FOR ELECTORATE S APPROVAL OF A THREE- QUARTER CENT SALES & USE TAX MEASURE ON NOVEMBER BALLOT & REVISED RESOLUTION TO PLACE THE ORDINANCE MEASURE ON THE BALLOT MEETING
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 960241comc100300.wpd OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON At a session of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, in the City of Charleston, on the 3rd day of October, 2000. GENERAL
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA in the City of Charleston on the lgth day of July 2018. GENERAL ORDER NO. 236.1 In the
More informationHong Kong International Arbitration Centre SECURITIES ARBITRATION RULES. Securities Arbitration Rules. adopted to take effect from 1 July 1993
Securities Arbitration Rules Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre SECURITIES ARBITRATION RULES adopted to take effect from 1 July 1993 Section 1 Introductory Rules Scope of Application Article 1
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DW LAKES REGION WATER CO., INC. Petition for Change in Rates and for Related Approvals
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DW 15-209 LAKES REGION WATER CO., INC. Petition for Change in Rates and for Related Approvals Order Approving Settlement Agreement and Change in Rates
More informationForm 5, Tariff Form 8-A1, Tariff Form 11 and a Tariff Rule 42 Financial Exhibit' to its filing.
SSI Entered: April 4,2016 CASE NO. 15-1696-PWD-42R BLUEWELL PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT, A public utility, Bluewell, Mercer County. Rule 42 application to increase water rates. RECOMMENDED DECISION This Recommended
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (Appearances are listed in Appendix H.)
ALJ/RAB/abw Mailed 12/22/2000 Decision 00-12-058 December 21, 2000 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company
More informationT ~ ~ R T PUBLIC O N SERVICE DISTRICT,
P SION Entered: January 22, 2019 CASE NO. 18-0947-PSD- 19A T ~ ~ R T PUBLIC O N SERVICE DISTRICT, a public utility, Buc~a~on, Upshur County, Rule 19A Application to increase sewer rates and charges. ~
More information(Transferred by P.L Ch. 372 (eff. June 12, 2009) to , Efficiency Maine Trust)
(Transferred by P.L. 2009 Ch. 372 (eff. June 12, 2009) to 95-648, Efficiency Maine Trust) 65-407 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Chapter 380: ELECTRIC ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAMS SUMMARY: This Chapter implements
More informationUNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (as revised in 2010) Section I. Introductory rules Scope of application* Article 1 1. Where parties have agreed that disputes between them in respect of a defined legal relationship,
More informationDOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC
STATE OF MAINE YORK, ss. ROWELL,LLC Appellee, v. 11 TOWN,LLC Appellant. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. AP-16-0032 I. Background A. Procedural History This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer
More informationFebruary 14, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Bill J. Crouch BOARD OF REVIEW M. Katherine Lawson Cabinet Secretary 203 East Third Avenue Inspector General
More informationSTATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD
STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: : : APPLICATION OF MIDAMERICAN : DOCKET NO. RPU-2016- ENERGY COMPANY FOR A : DETERMINATION OF : RATEMAKING PRINCIPLES : REQUEST FOR APPROVAL
More informationCase KJC Doc 804 Filed 12/21/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : Chapter 11
Case 16-10292-KJC Doc 804 Filed 12/21/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x In re RYCKMAN
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ANN H. KIM GAIL L.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Approval of Economic Development Rate for 2013-2017 (U 39 E) Application No. 12-03-
More informationCASE NO.: ER Surrebuttal Testimony of Bruce E. Biewald. On Behalf of Sierra Club
Exhibit No.: Issue: Planning Prudence and Rates Witness: Bruce Biewald Type of Exhibit: Surrebuttal Testimony Sponsoring Party: Sierra Club Case No.: ER-0-0 Date Testimony Prepared: October, 0 MISSOURI
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * BLUESTONE INDUSTRIES, INC. * COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * *
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * BLUESTONE INDUSTRIES, INC. * --COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * * CHESTNUT LAND HOLDINGS, LLC * --COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * * KENTUCKY
More informationJune 21, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter.
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Jim Justice BOARD OF REVIEW Bill J. Crouch Governor 4190 West Washington Street Cabinet Secretary Charleston,
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-7, SUB 1146 ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-7, SUB 1146 BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of Application of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for Adjustment of
More informationKEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014
KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3113 TELECOPIERS: (617) 951-1354 (617) 951-1400 (617) 951-0586 March 17, 2014 Mark Marini, Secretary Department of Public
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH,
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH, IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATION REACHED BETWEEN THE GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PUBLIC INTEREST
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-100, SUB 84
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-100, SUB 84 BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of Investigation of Integrated Resource Planning in North Carolina
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Effective 27 July 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introductory rules... 4 Scope of application Article 1... 4 Article 2... 4 Notice
More informationBoard of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Lori Austin September, 2010
Board of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Lori Austin September, 2010 Q: Please state your name and your business address. A: My name is Lori Austin, 540 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101.
More informationState Tax Credits Promoting Local Coal Use
Chapter 12 Cite as 21 Energy & Min. L. Inst. ch. 12 (2001) State Tax Credits Promoting Local Coal Use John A. Mairs Jackson & Kelly PLLC Charleston, West Virginia Synopsis 12.01. Introduction... 423 12.02.
More informationORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT
Page 1 of 8 STATE OF MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION At a session of the Public Service Commission held at its office in Jefferson City on the 13th day of April, 2004. In the Matter of the Request of
More informationMALDEN PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT, A public utility, Kanawha County. Rule 42T application to increase Sewer rates and charges.
CASE NO. 15-1359-PSD-42T MALDEN PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT, A public utility, Kanawha County. Rule 42T application to increase Sewer rates and charges. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON
More informationROCK ISLAND COUNTY RESOLUTION NO.
ROCK ISLAND COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF QUAD CITIES POWER STATION REAL PROEPRTY TAX ASSESSMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, ROCK ISLAND COUNTY (hereinafter referred
More informationEl Paso Electric Announces Fourth Quarter and Annual 2017 Financial Results
NEWS RELEASE El Paso Electric Announces Fourth Quarter and Annual 2017 Financial Results 2/27/2018 EL PASO, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- El Paso Electric Company (NYSE:EE): Overview For the fourth quarter
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 18-035-01 Witness: Michael G. Wilding BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding March 2018 1
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter:
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Consideration of the tax impacts associated with Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 Florida Public Utilities Company - Gas. ISSUED: February 25, 2019 The
More informationCase KRH Doc 1049 Filed 12/07/15 Entered 12/07/15 21:29:47 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 29
Document Page 1 of 29 JONES DAY North Point 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Telephone: (216) 586-3939 Facsimile: (216) 579-0212 David G. Heiman (admitted pro hac vice) Carl E. Black (admitted
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNANIMOUS COMPREHENSIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Page 1 of 28 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR AUTHORIZATION TO REVISE THE DEPRECIATION
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION REPORT AND ORDER
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN RE: NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY: LAST RESORT SERVICE RATES : DOCKET NO. 3117 LAST RESORT SUPPLY CONTRACT : DOCKET NO. 3005
More informationState Legislation and Regulations Supporting Nuclear Plant Construction
May 2008 State Legislation and Regulations Supporting Nuclear Plant Construction Florida 1 Georgia. 3 Iowa.. 4 Kansas.. 5 Louisiana. 6 Mississippi 7 North Carolina.. 8 Ohio.... 9 South Carolina.. 9 Texas.
More informationEnclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Earl Ray Tomblin BOARD OF REVIEW Karen L. Bowling Governor 2699 Park Avenue, Suite 100 Huntington, WV 2504 Cabinet
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF : BPU DOCKET NO. SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY : TO CHANGE THE LEVELS OF ITS : SOCIETAL BENEFITS CLAUSE ( SBC ) : AND ITS TRANSPORTATION
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeals of -- ) ) R&R Group, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos , ) Under Contract No. SPO D-2920 )
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) R&R Group, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 52328, 52711 ) Under Contract No. SPO300-97-D-2920 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Francis Louis Zarrilli, Esq. Broomall,
More informationJuly 20, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Earl Ray Tomblin BOARD OF REVIEW Karen L. Bowling Governor 1400 Virginia Street Cabinet Secretary Oak Hill, WV
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON COMMISSION ORDER
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA in the City of Charleston on the 3'd day of January 2018. GENERAL ORDER NO. 236.1 In
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON
I/ PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON CASE NO. 17-063 1 -E-P AMERICAN BITUMINOUS POWER PARTNERS, L.P. and MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY Joint Petition to reopen for Approval of Amendment
More informationSenate Bill No. 437 Committee on Commerce and Labor
Senate Bill No. 437 Committee on Commerce and Labor - CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to economic and energy development; enacting the Solar Energy Systems Incentive Program, the Renewable Energy School Pilot
More informationOF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON PROCEDURE. formal complaint, duly verified, against Morgantown Water Commission, a
At a session of the OF WEST 17ZF.GINZA at the Capitol in the City of Charleston on the 6th day of August, 1976. CASE NO. 5443 ROBERT POYOUROW, ET ALS., Complainants, vs. MORGANTOWN WATER COMMISSION, a
More informationJanuary 10, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Earl Ray Tomblin BOARD OF REVIEW Karen L. Bowling Governor 1400 Virginia Street Cabinet Secretary Oak Hill, WV
More informationRAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS GAS SERVICES DIVISION ) ) ) )
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS GAS SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF INTENT OF WEST TEXAS GAS, INC. TO INCREASE GAS DISTRIBUTION RATES IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF TEXAS GUD NO. STATEMENT OF INTENT OF WEST
More informationDEFAULT SERVICE IN PENNSYLVANIA. David B. MacGregor, Esquire Anthony D. Kanagy, Esquire Post & Schell, P.C.
DEFAULT SERVICE IN PENNSYLVANIA David B. MacGregor, Esquire Anthony D. Kanagy, Esquire Post & Schell, P.C. Synopsis: This presentation provides an overview of default electric service in Pennsylvania beginning
More informationThe Utilities Fund is broken into two categories: a Capacity Expansion Fund and an Operating Fund.
Attachment 1 O16-19 BACKGROUND REPORT The Utilities Fund is an enterprise fund. An enterprise fund establishes a separate accounting financial reporting mechanism for municipal services for which a fee
More information2017 Governor s Energy Summit. Holly Kauffman President, West Virginia Operations
2017 Governor s Energy Summit Holly Kauffman President, West Virginia Operations About FirstEnergy Headquartered in Akron, Ohio 6 million customers served 10 electric utility operating companies in 6 states
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE SITE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationJanuary 21, v WV DHHR BOR ACTION NOS.: 15-BOR-3592 and 15-BOR-3593
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Earl Ray Tomblin BOARD OF REVIEW Karen L. Bowling Governor 4190 Washington Street, West Cabinet Secretary Charleston,
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI (Effective as of 1 January 2015)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I: Introductory Provisions Model Arbitration Clause: Article 1 - Scope of Application Article 2 - Notice and Calculation of Period of Time Article
More informationAssembly Bill No. 428 Committee on Commerce and Labor
Assembly Bill No. 428 Committee on Commerce and Labor CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to energy; revising provisions relating to the Solar Energy Systems Incentive Program, the Wind Energy Systems Demonstration
More informationMay 6, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Earl Ray Tomblin BOARD OF REVIEW Karen L. Bowling Governor 4190 Washington Street, West Cabinet Secretary Charleston,
More informationBEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD ORDER AFFIRMING DISTRICT COMMITTEE'S DETERMINATION
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS HUNT ROBERTS VSB Docket No. 16-031-106233 ORDER AFFIRMING DISTRICT COMMITTEE'S DETERMINATION This matter was heard on
More informationSTATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED PETITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a VECTREN ENERGY DELIVERY OF IN DIANA, INC., FOR: ( AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT, OWN
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY (FIRE DEPARTMENT)
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY (FIRE DEPARTMENT) and MILWAUKEE COUNTY FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 1072 Case 761 No. 70619 MA-14998 (Hareng)
More informationNon-Conforming, Negotiated Rate Transportation Service Agreement Filing; El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Docket No. RP17-
September 21, 2017 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Attention: Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Re: Non-Conforming, Negotiated Rate Transportation Service
More informationKAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW
KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILLIAM CORNELL ARCHBOLD, JR* JOSEPH PATRICK O'BRIEN** JOHN YANOSHAK CHRISTOPHER H. PEIFER*** OF COUNSEL FRED KREPPEL GLEN MADERE EDWARD KASSAB 1927-2010 *ALSO MEMBER
More informationORDER NO * * * * * * * * On August 6, 2014, the Maryland Public Service Commission ( Commission )
ORDER NO. 86877 IN THE MATTER OF AN INVESTIGATION TO CONSIDER THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF REGULATION OVER THE OPERATIONS OF UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTHER SIMILAR COMPANIES BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
More informationCEDRAC Rules. in force as from 1 January 2012
CEDRAC Rules in force as from 1 January 2012 CONTENTS Section I Introductory rules Article 1 Scope of application p. 1 Article 2 Notice, calculation of period of time p. 1 Article 3 Request for Arbitration
More informationTITLE VII RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MODEL CLAUSE
TITLE VII RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MODEL CLAUSE "Any dispute or difference regarding this contract, or related thereto, shall be settled by arbitration upon an Arbitral
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ANNUAL REPORT
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 TANYA J. MCCLOSKEY ACTING CONSUMER ADVOCATE 555 WALNUT STREET 5TH FLOOR, FORUM PLACE HARRISBURG, PA
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F MICHAEL DRIGGERS, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JUNE 11, 2010
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F712083 MICHAEL DRIGGERS, EMPLOYEE MILAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, EMPLOYER CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA ARKANSAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG LIBERTY UTILITIES (ENERGYNORTH NATURAL GAS) CORP. d/b/a LIBERTY UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG 16-447 LIBERTY UTILITIES (ENERGYNORTH NATURAL GAS) CORP. d/b/a LIBERTY UTILITIES Managed Expansion Program Rates Order Approving Rates and Tariffs
More informationArbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Draft for public consultation 26 April 2016 Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of
More informationLine No. WITNESS: JEFFREY L. ADAMS Page 1 A. INTRODUCTION. Q. Please state your name and business address. B. PURPOSE
No. WITNESS: JEFFREY L. ADAMS Page 0 A. INTRODUCTION Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is Jeffrey L. Adams. My business address is Fairmont Avenue, Fairmont, West Virginia. Q.
More informationFILED JUL COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) FOR AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ) CAUSE NO. PUD 201100087 AUTHORIZING APPLICANT TO
More informationPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION ARBITRATION RULES 2012
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION ARBITRATION RULES 2012 Effective December 17, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introductory rules...5 Scope of application Article 1...5 Article 2...5 Notice of arbitration
More informationINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM APPLICATION STATEMENT
1. Applicant INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM APPLICATION STATEMENT a. Tell us what you are, e.g. governmental organization, Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3) organization,
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY ) for approval of
More information