Merced Vision 2030 General Plan
|
|
|
- Arnold Marsh
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan City Council Public Hearing (Continued) October 17, 2011 Kim Espinosa, Planning Manager
2 Tonight s Meeting Staff Presentation Overview of the Options requested by City Council on Sept. 19, 2011 EIR Alternatives Planning Commission Recommendation Public Hearing City Council Vote Preliminary Vote to Choose an Option Certification of EIR Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Land Use Diagram (up to 9 Sectors) LAFCO Application
3 City Council Direction from September 19, 2011 Public hearing was held with 7 individuals testifying. During City Council discussion, Council Members expressed a desire to reduce the proposed growth boundary in size by taking out both Castle Farms and Mission Lakes, taking out just Mission Lakes, or taking out other undefined areas. Support was expressed for leaving any areas taken out within the Area of Interest (AOI) and for leaving the UC Merced campus and University Community areas within the growth boundary (SUDP/SOI).
4 City Council Direction from September 19, 2011 (Cont.) The City Council wished to look at 3 possible options for adopting the General Plan and EIR: 1) The current proposal; or, 2) Another proposal based on EIR Alternative #2 (removing both Castle Farms and Mission Lakes); or, 3) Another proposal based on a modified EIR Alternative #2 (removing only Mission Lakes) The public hearing was subsequently continued to October 17, 2011 (tonight) to consider these three options.
5 Three Options
6 Option 1--Draft General Plan (Planning Commission Recommendation), or, Option 2 --EIR Alternative #2 (Removing Castle Farms & Mission Lakes); or, Option 3--Modified EIR Alternative #2A (Removing Mission Lakes Only). 3 Possible Options
7 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Option 1 (Draft General Plan)-- Specific Urban Development Plan (SUDP)/Sphere of Influence (SOI) 33, 576 acres
8 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Option 1 (Draft General Plan) Land Use Diagram
9 Option 1 Draft General Plan (Planning Commission Recommendation) SUDP/SOI (33, 576 acres) is as proposed in the August 2010 Draft, including Castle Farms and Mission Lakes Minor modifications have been proposed to the General Plan text and Land Use Diagram as seen at Exhibits B & C of Attachment 9. Findings of Fact and A Statement of Overriding Considerations (including findings for rejection of the EIR Alternatives) have been prepared for adoption of the EIR as seen in Exhibit 1 of Attachment 8. Mitigation Monitoring Program and EIR Errata Sheet (Exhibits 2 & 3 of Attachment 8) are the same for all options.
10 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Option 2 (EIR Alternative #2)-- Specific Urban Development Plan (SUDP)/Sphere of Influence (SOI) 28, 576 acres
11 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Option 2 (EIR Alternative #2) Land Use Diagram (Removes Castle Farms & Mission Lakes Community Plans from SUDP/SOI)
12 Option 2 EIR Alternative #2 (Removing Castle Farms & Mission Lakes) SUDP/SOI (28, 576 acres) has been modified to remove Castle Farms and Mission Lakes, which remain in the Area of Interest. Additional modifications have been proposed to the General Plan text and Land Use Diagram to reflect the change above as seen at Exhibits B & C of Attachment 12. Findings of Fact and A Statement of Overriding Considerations to reflect the adoption of EIR Alternative #2 have been prepared as seen in Exhibit 1 of Attachment 11. Mitigation Monitoring Program and EIR Errata Sheet (Exhibits 2 & 3 of Attachment 11) are the same for all options. LAFCO resolution was modified to reflect SUDP/SOI above (Attachment 13).
13 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Option 3 (Modified EIR Alternative #2A)-- Specific Urban Development Plan (SUDP)/Sphere of Influence (SOI) 31,076 acres
14 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Option 3 (Modified EIR Alternative #2A) Land Use Diagram (Removes Mission Lakes Only from SUDP/SOI)
15 Option 3 Modified EIR Alternative #2A (Removing Mission Lakes Only) SUDP/SOI (31, 076 acres) has been modified to remove Mission Lakes, which remains in the Area of Interest. Additional modifications have been proposed to the General Plan text and Land Use Diagram to reflect the change above (Exhibits B & C of Attachment 15). Findings of Fact & Statement of Overriding Considerations to reflect the adoption of a modified EIR Alternative #2A was prepared (Exhibit 1 of Attachment 14). EIR Errata Sheet (Exhibit 3 of Attachment 14) reflects the addition of a modified EIR Alternative but no recirculation of the EIR is necessary because this alternative is not substantially different from the 3 alternatives originally analyzed in the Draft EIR and would not, as compared to one or more of the original alternatives, clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the Project (Option 1). LAFCO resolution was modified to reflect SUDP/SOI above (Attachment 16).
16 Merced Vision 2015 General Plan (1997) vs. Draft Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Options Adopted Plan-- SUDP = 20,700 acres SOI = 37,300 acres Option 1-- Combined SUDP/SOI = 33,576 acres AOI = 10,000 acres Option 2-- Combined SUDP/SOI = 28,576 acres AOI = 15,000 acres Option 3-- Combined SUDP/SOI = 31,076 acres AOI = 12,500 acres
17 Draft & Final Program Environmental Impact Report Merced Vision 2030 General Plan SCH# Prepared for: City of Merced Development Services Department Planning & Permitting Division August 2010/July 2011
18 Alternative #1 Existing General Plan (No Project) - Merced Vision 2030 General Plan would not be adopted, and existing Merced Vision 2015 General Plan would remain in effect (SUDP = 21,700 acres). - Would result in the reduction of 10 impacts, the increase of 3 impacts, and 4 impacts remain unchanged compared to the Draft General Plan (Project) - Found to be environmentally inferior to the Project and other alternatives for failing to meet project objectives.
19 Alternative #2 (Option 2) Reduced Project Area - Slightly less new development allowed in comparison with the proposed General Plan. - Growth restricted to a smaller expansion area, including UC Merced & University Community (2005 Draft SUDP), but removes 2 other large community plan areas added in (SUDP = 28,576 acres). - Considered feasible because the City could grow at a slower pace than expected.
20 Alternative #2 (cont.) - Would result in the reduction of 11 impacts, the increase of 0 impacts, and 6 impacts remain unchanged compared to the Draft General Plan. - Alt #2 is the environmentally superior alternative because it reduces more potential impacts than the others. - City Council has indicated it would consider adoption of this Alternative (Option 2).
21 Alternative #3 Concentrated Growth - Total amount of new units similar to that allowed under the Plan but residential densities would be increased (SUDP remains the same). - More land designated as Open Space or Reserve. - Would result in the reduction of 8 impacts, no impacts would increase, & 9 impacts would remain unchanged. - Rejected due to failure to meet Project objectives or to lessen significant impacts.
22 Alternative #2A (New) Modified Reduced Project Area - Similar to Alternative #2, but only one Community Plan area is eliminated. - A variation of Alternative #2 so the impact analysis is the same. - Would result in the reduction of 11 impacts, no impacts would increase, & 6 impacts would remain unchanged. - City Council has indicated it would consider adoption of this Alternative (Option 3).
23 Adopting the Land Use Diagram & Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
24 Adopting the Land Use Diagram & Avoiding Conflicts of Interest In order to avoid potential or perceived conflicts of interest regarding properties owned by the City Council Members, the City Attorney has advised that the General Plan Land Use Diagram be adopted in segments. Even though no changes in land use designation are proposed within the current City limits where these properties are located, this approach reflects an abundance of caution to avoid even perceived conflicts of interest. For the City Council, staff divided the Land Use Diagram into 9 sectors for Option 1, 7 sectors for Option 2, and 8 sectors for Option 3 based on the locations of the primary residences of the members and other property interests that were provided to the City by those members.
25 Adopting the Land Use Diagram & Avoiding Conflicts of Interest These sectors are drawn so that no more than one member should have to declare a potential conflict of interest for any one sector. Once the City Council has tentatively selected an Option, first a vote must be taken to adopt the EIR according to one of the Options. Then to adopt the General Plan resolution, separate votes will need to be taken for each land use sector (either 9, 7, or 8) as well as a separate vote to adopt the General Plan as a whole. Finally a separate vote will need to be taken on the LAFCO resolution. Prior to each vote on an individual land use sector, the Council Member with a potential conflict of interest will need to declare a conflict and leave the Council chambers.
26 Option 1--Land Use Sectors Sector I S of Hwy 99/Hwy 140, E of R (S of Childs) & Q (N of Childs) Sector II N of Hwy 99/Hwy 140, E of Q, & S of N Bear Creek (Q to Oleander), S of Alexander (Oleander to McKee), & S of E Olive, E of McKee Sector III E of G & N of N Bear Creek (G to Oleander), N of Alexander (Oleander to McKee), & N of E Olive, E of McKee Sector IV N of Hwy 99 (T to Q), N of N Bear Creek (R to G), & N of Loughborough (M to G) Sector V S of Santa Fe/W Olive & W of R (Olive to N Bear Creek), W of T (N Bear Creek to Hwy 99), & S of Hwy 99, W of Q (Hwy 99 to Childs) & W of S Hwy 59, S of Childs Sector VI N of Santa Fe/W Olive (N Hwy 59 to R), E of N Hwy 59 (Olive to Buena Vista), E of Sarasota (Buena Vista to El Redondo), & E of San Augustine, N of El Redondo Sector VII N of Santa Fe/W Olive, W of N Hwy 59 (Olive to Buena Vista), W of Sarasota (Buena Vista to El Redondo), & W of San Augustine, N of El Redondo Sector VIII Castle Farms (Options 1 & 3 only) Sector IX Mission Lakes (Option 1 only)
27 Adopting An Option
28 Approve Option 1 (Original Draft General Plan), as recommended by the Planning Commission, including Resolutions at Attachments 8, 9, and 10; or, Approve Option 2 (EIR Alternative #2), including Resolutions at Attachments 11, 12, and 13; or, Approve Option 3 (Modified EIR Alternative #2A), including Resolutions at Attachments 14, 15, and Possible Options
29 Option 1 Draft General Plan (Planning Commission Recommendation)
30 Option 1 Draft General Plan (Planning Commission Recommendation) Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a motion for Option 1: A. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Approving and Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan, Making Findings and Determinations, Adopting a Statement of Facts and Overriding Considerations, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment 8); and,
31 B. Adoption of the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Land Use Diagram (Figure 3.1 of the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan) divided into 9 sectors (9 separate votes needed) as seen at Exhibit D of the Resolution at Attachment 9: Option 1 (Cont.)
32 Option 1 (Cont.) B. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Adopting the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan (Attachment 9) with the changes to the General Plan Text and Land Use Diagram per Exhibits B & C of Attachment 9; and,
33 Option 1 (Cont.) C. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Making Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission for Expansion of the City s Sphere of Influence (SOI) (Attachment 10).
34 Option 2 EIR Alternative #2
35 Option 2 EIR Alternative #2 (Removing Castle Farms & Mission Adopt a motion for Option 2: Lakes) A. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Approving and Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan, Making Findings and Determinations, Adopting a Statement of Facts and Overriding Considerations, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment 11); and,
36 B. Adoption of the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Land Use Diagram (Figure 3.1 of the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan) divided into 9 sectors (7 separate votes needed) as seen at Exhibit D of the Resolution at Attachment 12: Option 2 (Cont.)
37 Option 2 (Cont.) B. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Adopting the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan (Attachment 12) with the changes to the General Plan Text and Land Use Diagram per Exhibits B & C of Attachment 12; and,
38 Option 2 (Cont.) C. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Making Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission for Expansion of the City s Sphere of Influence (SOI) (Attachment 13).
39 Option 3 Modified EIR Alternative #2
40 Option 3 Modified EIR Alternative #2 (Removing Mission Lakes Only) Adopt a motion for Option 3: A. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Approving and Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan, Making Findings and Determinations, Adopting a Statement of Facts and Overriding Considerations, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment 14); and,
41 B. Adoption of the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Land Use Diagram (Figure 3.1 of the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan) divided into 8 sectors (8 separate votes needed) as seen at Exhibit D of the Resolution at Attachment 15: Option 3 (Cont.)
42 Option 3 (Cont.) B. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Adopting the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan (Attachment 15) with the changes to the General Plan Text and Land Use Diagram per Exhibits B & C of Attachment 15; and,
43 Option 3 (Cont.) C. Approving Resolution # A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, Making Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission for Expansion of the City s Sphere of Influence (SOI) (Attachment 16).
44 Questions?
45 Public Hearing
46 Preliminary Vote on Options
47 Approve Option 1 (Original Draft General Plan), as recommended by the Planning Commission, including Resolutions at Attachments 8, 9, and 10; or, Approve Option 2 (EIR Alternative #2), including Resolutions at Attachments 11, 12, and 13; or, Approve Option 3 (Modified EIR Alternative #2A), including Resolutions at Attachments 14, 15, and Possible Options
48 Official City Council Action
49 To approve Option 1: 1) EIR (Attachment 8) one vote; and, 2) General Plan (Attachment 9) 9 votes on Sectors plus 1 vote on overall; and, 3) LAFCO (Attachment 10) 1 vote To approve Option 2: 1) EIR (Attachment 11) one vote; and, 2) General Plan (Attachment 12) 7 votes on Sectors plus 1 vote on overall; and, 3) LAFCO (Attachment 13) 1 vote To approve Option 3: 1) EIR (Attachment 14) one vote; and, 2) General Plan (Attachment 15) 8 votes on Sectors plus 1 vote on overall; and, 3) LAFCO (Attachment 16) 1 vote 3 Possible Options
50 Option 1--Potential Conflicts of Interest Sector I Council Member Rawlings Sector II Mayor Spriggs Sector III Council Member Carlisle Sector IV Council Member Gabriault-Acosta Sector V Mayor Pro Tempore Blake Sector VI Council Member Lor Sector VII Council Member Pedrozo Sector VIII None Sector IX--None
51 Option 2--Potential Conflicts of Interest Sector I Council Member Rawlings Sector II Mayor Spriggs Sector III Council Member Carlisle Sector IV Council Member Gabriault-Acosta Sector V Mayor Pro Tempore Blake Sector VI Council Member Lor Sector VII Council Member Pedrozo
52 Option 3--Potential Conflicts of Interest Sector I Council Member Rawlings Sector II Mayor Spriggs Sector III Council Member Carlisle Sector IV Council Member Gabriault-Acosta Sector V Mayor Pro Tempore Blake Sector VI Council Member Lor Sector VII Council Member Pedrozo Sector VIII None
Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Tyra Hays, AICP, (707) )
Agenda Item No. 8C May 10, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Tyra Hays,
RESOLUTION NO
PO Qf sup, a1to~.' un`y` : RESOLUTION NO. 265-2006 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF EL DORADO CERTIFYING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT TO THE 2004 GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE The County of Mariposa Board of Supervisors proposes to adopt the Mariposa County General Plan. This General Plan will replace the County s current General Plan, which was prepared
CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN
Comprehensive General Plan/Administration and Implementation CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN CHAPTER II ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION This Chapter of the General Plan addresses the administration
STAFF REPORT. Nishi Student Housing Application: Processing Directions
STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Council Mike Webb, Assistant City Manager Ashley Feeney, Assistant Director Community Development & Sustainability Katherine Hess, Community
[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]
![[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]](/thumbs/82/85819222.jpg "[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]")
FILE NO. ORDINANCE NO. 1 [Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District] Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations and Planning Codes
Administrative Code Chapter 31 Amendments
t Administrative Code Chapter 31 Amendments Case Number: Ordinance No. 161-13 Initiated by: Supervisor Wiener Effective Date: September 25, 2013 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103~2479
Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of Completion of the DEIR that was filed by mail with the State Office of
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. EIR14-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK CERTIFYING THE COMPLETION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND RECIRCULATED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS According to CEQA, an EIR must describe a reasonable range of alternatives to a proposed project that could feasibly attain most of the basic project
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM
106 Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ADOPTION OF FINDINGS, AND
A. Certify the UCLA Long Range Development Plan Amendment (2017) and Student Housing Projects Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.
FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE January 25, 2018 TO THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 1. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT #6 TO THE UCLA 2002 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL ON-CAMPUS
Schedule of Fees and Deposits Adopted August 14, 2014 Amended October 13, 2016
MARIN COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Regional Service Planning State of California Administrative Office 1401 Los Gamos Drive, # 230 San Rafael, California 94903 T: 415-448-5877 E: staff@marinlafco.org
How to Participate in the Environmental Review Process. September 29, 2016
How to Participate in the Environmental Review Process September 29, 2016 Training for Citizen Participants Katherine Hess Community Development Administrator Eric Lee Planner Purposes De-mystify public
SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016
COUNCIL AGENDA: 12/13/16 ITEM: 10.1(a) TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016 SUBJECT: GPT16-009. CITY-INITIATED GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS
J v` 460t* Assistant Town Manager /Director of Commun ty LAUREL R. PREVETTIL GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGER MEETING DATE: 09/ 02/ 14.
t wx f MEETING DATE: 09/ 02/ 14 ITEM NO: Vrlr SOS c " tos COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: AUGUST 27, 2014 TO: A+ p J v` 460t* FROM: GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: NORTH FORTY SPECIFIC PLAN GENERAL PLAN
STAFF REPORT. PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Commission Action
CITY OF LAKEPORT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 09-01/City of Lakeport 2025 General Plan: Recommended changes to the Draft General Plan Planning Commission Resolution #76 Planning Commission
RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on July 24, 2017 a Scoping Meeting was noticed and held pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083; and,
RESOLUTION 2018 A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TRINITAS MIXED-USE PROJECT, ADOPTING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF
RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING THE BELMONT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (BVSP)
RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING THE BELMONT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (BVSP) WHEREAS, on November 14, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2035 General Plan (GP),
Exhibit "B" TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE, NUMBER ONE CITY OF BAYTOWN. July 8, 2015
Exhibit "B" TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE, NUMBER ONE CITY OF BAYTOWN July 8, 2015 2015 AMENDMENT TO THE PROJECT PLAN AND REINVESTMENT ZONE FINANCING PLAN PROJECT PLAN Page I. Existing uses and conditions
City of Stockton Community Development Department 345 N. El Dorado Street Stockton, CA 95202
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM STOCKTON CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AND RELATED ACTIONS (SCH# 2012042065) P REPARED FOR: Community Development Department 345 N. El Dorado Street Stockton, CA 95202
General Plan Update 2020
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK DEVELOPMENT SERVICES for 2020 City of Rohnert Park Development Services 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, CA 94928 (707) 588-2253 Distribution/Advertisement: December 4, 2017 Pre-Proposal
1. I N T R O D U C T I O N
INTRODUCTION The Chico 2030 General Plan is a statement of community priorities to guide public decisionmaking. It provides a comprehensive, long-range, and internally consistent policy framework for the
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Elizabeth Corpuz, Director of Planning and Building Services Jason P. Clarke, Senior Planner
Page 1 of 16 14-L TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Elizabeth Corpuz, Director of Planning and Building Services Jason P. Clarke,
City of Culver City. Staff Report
City of Culver City City Hall 9770 Culver Blvd. Culver City, CA 90232 (310) 253-5851 Staff Report CC - (1) Presentations and Discussion Regarding the Inglewood Oil Field (IOF) Specific Plan Project; and
Staff Report. Staff requests Commission review, discussion and determination of a policy on Unincorporated Islands and Corridors
SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE, ROOM 104A, SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 (707) 565-2577 FAX (707) 565-3778 www.sonoma-county.org/lafco Staff Report Meeting Date: April 4, 2012
Report and Recommendations Reviewed and Approved. City Manager. AGENDA ITEM December 15, 2015, Meeting
Report and Recommendations Reviewed and Approved 5.1 City Manager AGENDA ITEM December 15, 2015, Meeting TO: FROM: John N. Duckett, Jr., City Manager Carla L. Thompson, AICP, Development Services Director
4.12 POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 4.12 POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT This section discusses the effects the proposed project may potentially have on local and regional population, housing, and employment. The
INSIDE LOOK: Mandated Projects Page 1. Commission Initiated Projects Page 5. Administrative Activities Page 6. Meetings and Outreach Efforts Page 8
INSIDE LOOK: Mandated Projects Page 1 Commission Initiated Projects Page 5 Administrative Activities Page 6 Meetings and Outreach Efforts Page 8 FY 2016-17 Budget Overview Page 9 I NTRODUCTION This Comprehensive
Schedule of Fees & Escrow Charges
PLANNING COMMISSION FEES (effective 6/8/10) Site Plan Review Filing Fees... $ 400.00 a) $1,000 (less than 50 acres, 150 units or 200,000 bldg sq ft) Site Plan Review for Attached or Multi-Family Housing
Chapter VIII. General Plan Implementation A. INTRODUCTION B. SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF SUBSEQUENT PROJECTS C. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
Chapter VIII General Plan Implementation A. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents a variety of tools available to the (City) to help build the physical city envisioned in Chapter III. While the Modesto provides
LAFCo 509 W. WEBER AVENUE SUITE 420 STOCKTON, CA 95203
SAN JOAQUIN LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 LAFCo 509 W. WEBER AVENUE SUITE 420 STOCKTON, CA 95203 REVISED EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT March 10, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LAFCo Commissioners
Alternative Financial Establishment Development Code Amendment Budget, Finance and Audit Committee February 28, 2011
Alternative Financial Establishment Development Code Amendment Budget, Finance and Audit Committee February 28, 2011 Department of Development Services Background City Council requested that the City Attorney
Planning Commission WORKSHOP: General Plan Implementation Program - Task 2 Refining the General Plan Implementation Checklist.
6.1 MARIPOSA COUNTY Commission 209-966-5151 MEETING: October 6, 2017 TO: FROM: The Mariposa County Commission Sarah Williams, Director RE: General Plan Implementation Program - Workshop 1 WORKSHOP: General
Inclusionary Housing Technical Advisory Committee: First Meeting. May 24, 2016
Inclusionary Housing Technical Advisory Committee: First Meeting May 24, 2016 Tonight's Agenda Call to order and Roll Call Introduction of the Committee members and staff Election of Committee Chair Review
OLD BUSINESS Agenda Item No.: 8a CC Mtg.: 11/08/2011
OLD BUSINESS Agenda Item No.: 8a CC Mtg.: 11/08/2011 DATE: November 3, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: City Manager's Office SUBJECT: FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT i. A Resolution
Executive Summary Planning Code Text Change HEARING DATE: MAY 8, 2014
Executive Summary Planning Code Text Change HEARING DATE: MAY 8, 014 Date: May 1, 014 Project Name: Amendments to the Definition of Bona Fide Eating Place Case Number: 01.1668T [Board File No. 11064] Initiated
City of Monte Sereno
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Services / Activities / Subject Matter Effective Date Page Planning s July 1, 2018 1-2 Public Works s July 1, 2018 3-4 Building s July 1, 2018 5-6 Administrative Services July 1, 2018
INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER RATE STUDY
I. PURPOSE INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER RATE STUDY The Indian Wells Valley Water District ( District ) is accepting Competitive Sealed Proposals for a cost of service and
FINAL DRAFT CONSISTENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT
CHRIS CHRISTIE Governor KIM GUADAGNO Lt. Governor State of New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council 100 North Road (Route 513) Chester, New Jersey 07930-2322 (908) 879-6737 (908) 879-4205
FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 CMR: 346:06
21a TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 CMR: 346:06 SUBJECT: 901 SAN ANTONIO ROAD [06PLN-00031, 06PLN-00050]: REQUEST BY
FINAL DRAFT CONSISTENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT
CHRIS CHRISTIE Governor KIM GUADAGNO Lt. Governor State of New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council 100 North Road (Route 513) Chester, New Jersey 07930-2322 (908) 879-6737 (908) 879-4205
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 9.B. 1) MEMO May 16, 2017 Staff Contact: Tyra Hays, AICP (707)
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 9.B. 1) MEMO May 16, 2017 Staff Contact: Tyra Hays, AICP (707) 449-5366 TITLE: INFORMATION ON THE CITY OF VACAVILLE MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW FOR THE
Policy Role in Land Use Planning
Policy Role in Land Use Planning Niroop K. Srivatsa Interim City Manager City of Lafayette Mark Teague, AICP Associate Principal PlaceWorks NEW MAYORS & COUNCIL MEMBERS ACADEMY JANUARY 17, 2109 1 IMAGINE
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW & SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE
CITY OF RIVERBANK MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW & SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE Existing SOI Proposed SOI Final Draft Prepared By: Adopted: July 27, 2016 February 2016 STANISLAUS LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA. Wednesday, September 9, :00 a.m.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, September 9, 2009 9:00 a.m. Room 381B Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, Los Angeles 90012 *********************************************************************
Fiscal Impact Assessment: A Scenario Planning Tool
Fiscal Impact Assessment: A Scenario Planning Tool CALAFCO Conference September 3, 2015 LAFCO Nexus to Fiscal Impact Analysis LAFCO s role under C-K-H Local Government Reorganization Act: Protect agricultural
POLICY TOPIC PAPER 1.0: SPECIFIC PLANS AND SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS
POLICY TOPIC PAPER 1.0: SPECIFIC PLANS AND SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS BACKGROUND The City uses a number of tools to guide and manage development. In addition to the General Plan, there are a number of Specific
INSIDE LOOK: Mandated Projects Page 1. Commission Initiated Projects Page 5. Administrative Activities Page 5. Meetings and Outreach Efforts Page 7
INSIDE LOOK: Mandated Projects Page 1 Commission Initiated Projects Page 5 Administrative Activities Page 5 Meetings and Outreach Efforts Page 7 FY 2016-17 Budget Overview Page 9 I N T R O D U C T I O
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR WATER RATES AND FINANCIAL MODEL STUDY Date of Issue: January 13, 2014 Due Date: January 31, 2014 The City requests that firms interested in responding to
Mayor Mark Friedman, and Suzanne Iarla, Assistant to the City Manager Study Session Regarding Establishing a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance
AGENDA BILL Agenda Item No. 7 Date: August 18, 2015 To: From: Subject: El Cerrito City Council Mayor Mark Friedman, and Suzanne Iarla, Assistant to the City Manager Study Session Regarding Establishing
CITY OF MERCED COUNCIL APPROVED BUDGET TAB 13
CITY OF MERCED 215-216 COUNCIL APPROVED BUDGET TAB 13 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS PAGE NO. Downtown Fund 13-1 Maintenance Districts 13-5 Community Facilities District (several) 13-14 North Merced Sewer Refunding
Martinez 21st Century
Update of the City of Martinez General Plan General 21 Elements Plan Work Program For Updating the City of Martinez General Plan Prepared Work Program for Updating the City of Martinez General Plan Work
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
SECTION 1.1 Introduction CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1.1 INTRODUCTION The subjects of this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) are the proposed Granada Hills Knollwood Community Plan and implementing ordinances
CENTRAL SOMA PLAN & IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
http://centralsoma.sfplanning.org CENTRAL SOMA PLAN & IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Adoption Hearing Planning Commission May 10, 2018 1 TODAY S ACTIONS 1. Certification of the Final EIR 2. Adoption of CEQA Findings
DRAFT. Prepared for: CBRE CONSULTING CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 2011
DRAFT PARKMERCED FISCAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Prepared for: CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 2011 CBRE CONSULTING 101 California Street, 44 th Floor
One Gateway PI; Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA goulr-~y,~...-.
Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway PI; Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA goulr-~y,~...-. REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE APRIL 20, 201 1 SUBJECT: EASTERN OPERATION AND
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA Control No.: 2002-0105 Type: GPB A D D E N D U M # 4 For the Agenda of: July 20, 2010 Agenda Item No. 4 TO: FROM: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GUIDELINES FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DURHAM
GUIDELINES FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DURHAM Authorized on October 25, 2006 at the Regularly Scheduled Monthly Meeting of the Housing Authority of the City of Durham I.
CEQA Checklist for School Districts
CEQA Checklist for School Districts (Revised March 2014) Copyright 2014 Lozano Smith For more information, please visit our website at LozanoSmith.com or call us Toll Free at 800.445.9430. CEQA Checklist
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) examines the potentially significant effects on the environment resulting from the proposed City of Citrus Heights City
SAN DIEGO LAFCO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 7, 2003
SAN DIEGO LAFCO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 7, 2003 There being a quorum present, the meeting was convened at 9:00 a.m. by Chairwoman Dianne Jacob. Also present were: Regular Commissioners Councilmember
Plain City Planning Commission Minutes of Meeting June 11, 2015
Plain City Planning Commission Minutes of Meeting June 11, 2015 Minutes of the Plain City Planning Commission held on Thursday June 11, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. located at the Council Chambers of the Plain City
DRAFT CITY OF CLOVIS MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE. Report to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission
DRAFT CITY OF CLOVIS MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE Report to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission MSR-19 02 / SOI-185 David E. Fey, Executive Officer George W. Uc, Senior
WHEREAS, The revised GMO Guidelines, which implement the requirements of the GMO, are set forth below;
RESOLUTION 2014-145 ADOPTING REVISED GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE GUIDELINES WHEREAS, On June 16, 1987, City Councii adopted by ordinance a Residential Growth Management Plan, (commonly referred to as the
Introduction P O L I C Y D O C U M E N T P A R T 1
P O L I C Y D O C U M E N T P A R T 1 Introduction The 2035 General Plan for San Joaquin County presents a vision for the County's future and a strategy to make that vision a reality. The Plan is the result
P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 3 Budget Committee March 7, Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council
P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 3 Budget Committee March 7, 2018 TO: Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council SUBMITTED BY: Jacques Dubé, Chief Administrative Officer
BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Minutes of October 10, 2018
BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Minutes of October 10, 2018 (A complete voice recording of the Commission's meetings can be obtained from www.buttelafco.org) 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Leverenz called
NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board Agenda Letter
Agenda Date: 3/22/2016 Agenda Placement: 9B Set Time: 9:15 AM PUBLIC HEARING Estimated Report Time: 6 Hours Continued From: February 9, 2016 NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM:
CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDELINES
CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDELINES Adopted by City Council on September 18, 2007 by Resolution No. 07-113 Revised by City Council on June 3, 2014 by Resolution No. 14-49 CITY OF BENICIA CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL
APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PROJECT COMPLETION AGREEMENT WITH CMK, LLC (DBA BAPC, LLC)
COUNCIL AGENDA: 11/15/16 ITEM: 4.1 CITY OF SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved TT>-PS N Date //A//c. COUNCIL
Appendix J: MTP Checklist. Introduction
J MTP Checklist Appendix J: MTP Checklist Introduction The 2016 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Guidelines includes a checklist that the Metropolitan Planning Organization is required to complete upon
CEQA Portal Topic Paper. Alternatives. What Are Alternatives? Why Are Project Alternatives Important?
CEQA Portal Topic Paper Alternatives What Are Alternatives? Alternatives, in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), are optional ways that the project proponent could achieve most
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA LETTER
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA LETTER Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 105 E. Anapamu Street, Suite 407 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805) 568-2240 Agenda Number: Department Name: P&D Department No.: 053 For
CHAIR OF THE BOARD CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1111 Franklin Street Oakland, CA 94607-5200 Phone: (510)
Planning Commission Staff Report
Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report February 5, 2015 Project: Southeast Policy Area, Amendment 1 File: PL0016 and EG-13-030 Request: General Plan Amendment, Community Plan Amendment,
INSIDE LOOK: Mandated Projects Page 1. Fostering Partnerships Page 6. Meetings and Outreach Efforts Page 8. FY Budget Overview Page 9
INSIDE LOOK: Mandated Projects Page 1 Fostering Partnerships Page 6 Meetings and Outreach Efforts Page 8 FY 2015-16 Budget Overview Page 9 I N T R O D U C T I O N The November Comprehensive Quarterly Report
Request for Proposal
Merced Fire Department Standards of Cover Request for Proposal Michael R. Wilkinson, Fire Chief Merced Fire Department 99 E. 16 th Street Merced, CA 95340 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The Merced Fire Department
FINAL DRAFT CONSISTENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT
CHRIS CHRISTIE Governor KIM GUADAGNO Lt. Governor State of New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council 100 North Road (Route 513) Chester, New Jersey 07930-2322 (908) 879-6737 (908) 879-4205
RULE BANKING OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (ERCs) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Adopted & Effective 10/22/97; Adopted & Effective (date of adoption))
RULE 26.0. BANKING OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (ERCs) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Adopted & Effective 10/22/97; Adopted & Effective (date of adoption)) (a) APPLICABILITY Rules 26.0 through 26.10 apply to any
2.2 Negative Declaration Preparation of a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration
2.2 Negative Declaration 2.2.1 Preparation of a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration A Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration should be prepared for a project when there
INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES NATOMAS BASIN CONSERVANCY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) September 3, 2010
INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES NATOMAS BASIN CONSERVANCY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) September 3, 2010 CONTENTS: INTRODUCTION I. DESCRIPTION OF ENTITY II. SCOPE OF SERVICES III. GENERAL CONSERVANCY ENDOWMENT
Canyon Estates Boundary Reorganization Application
Attachment #4 Canyon Estates Boundary Reorganization Application This packet contains the following materials prepared for the Canyon Estates Boundary Reorganization and Sphere of Influence (SOI) Amendment,
A Viable Reduced Size Alternative Plan for the Village at Squaw Valley
A Viable Reduced Size Alternative Plan for the Village at Squaw Valley The CEQA Alternatives Economic Analysis of July 29, 2016 should be rejected Presentation to the Placer County Board of Supervisors
Issue #9 Forward Devils Lake's Quarterly Newsletter 2nd Quarter 2017
Issue #9 Forward Devils Lake's Quarterly Newsletter 2nd Quarter 2017 DIRECTOR'S LETTER: We talk a great deal about the UAV/UAS/Drone industry during our meetings. Our hope is that with the recent develops
CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT URSULA LUNA-REYNOSA, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
10/07/14 Page 1 Item #10 CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT Reviewed By: DH _X_ CM _X_ CA _X_ DATE: OCTOBER 7, 2014 TO: FROM: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL URSULA LUNA-REYNOSA, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Board of Directors. Development Impact Fees: Member Agency Audits and Mitigation Fee Act Resolution
125 Pacifica, Irvine, CA 92618 949/754-3400 FAX 949/754-3467 DATE: September 8, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Board of Directors Greg Walker, Manager, Internal
BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE
Revised: May 17, 2018 BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE Article I. Authorization. The Board of Assessment Review of New Castle County (hereinafter referred to as the Board
Case No.: N/A Staff Phone #: (805) Environmental Document: N/A 1.0 REQUEST
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report/Work Program for FY 2014-2015 Long Range Planning Division Planning and Development Department Hearing Date: February 19, 2014 Staff Report
RULES AND REGULATIONS. DEFINITIONS (100 Series)
HIGH OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNIT shall means: RULES AND REGULATIONS DEFINITIONS (100 Series) any operating Public School as defined in 22-7-703(4), C.R.S., Nonpublic School as defined in 22-30.5-103.6(6.5),
UCM DA 176. September 7, 2018 VICE CHANCELLOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UCM DA 176 September 7, 2018 VICE CHANCELLOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RE: Delegation of - Appointment of and Execution of Agreements for Executive Architects, Executive Landscape Architects, and Executive
Welcome to the Dias you know all about CEQA right? Shannon George & Mark Teague
Welcome to the Dias you know all about CEQA right? Shannon George & Mark Teague Presenters Shannon George Senior Project Manager David Powers & Associates (408) 454-3402 SGeorge@davidjpowers.com Mark Teague,
NOVATO GENERAL PLAN 2035 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
G-3 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 26, 2017 TO: FROM: City Council Steve Marshall, Planning Manager 922 Machin Avenue Novato, CA 94945 415/ 899-8900 FAX 415/ 899-8213 www.novato.org SUBJECT: NOVATO
Traffic Mitigation Agreement Fair Share Payment
Traffic Mitigation Agreement Fair Share Payment TRAFFIC MITIGATION AGREEMENT FAIR SHARE PAYMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into and effective this day of, 2011, by and between the State of California, acting
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Community Development Department/Planning Division 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc CA 93436 Issue Date: July 25, 2007
SACRAMENTO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1112 I Street #100 Sacramento, California (916) April 7, 2004
SACRAMENTO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1112 I Street #100 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 874-6458 April 7, 2004 TO: FROM: RE: Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, LAFCo
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2018 Submit proposal to: Tony Williams, Principal Civil Engineer Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services MEETING DATE: January 17, PREPARED BY: Emy-Rose Hanna, Management Analyst
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services MEETING DATE: January 17, 2017 PREPARED BY: Emy-Rose Hanna, Management Analyst AGENDA LOCATION: CC-6 TITLE: Update to Debt Management Policy
CITY OF ISSAQUAH PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION MINUTES. August 27, Council Chambers Issaquah, WA 98027
CITY OF ISSAQUAH PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION MINUTES August 27, 2015 City Hall South 135 E. Sunset Way Council Chambers Issaquah, WA 98027 PPC MEMBERS PRESENT Joan Probala, Chair Ray Extract Joy Lewis Carl
7 ITEM 8 10:20 A.M. January 12, 2006 STAFF REPORT
7 ITEM 8 10:20 A.M. January 12, 2006 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: Planning Commission Mary Jane Fagalde, Community Development Department Director Prepared by: Richard Coel, Assistant Director DATE: January
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Mission Statement We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NO. 7.C.3 Meeting Date: September