Attached below are the questions submitted and the answers provided by the City of Culver City with regard to the captioned Request for Proposal.

Transcription

1 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 1 DATE: 04/26/2016 WHO: Registered List of Bidders HOW: ORIGINAL TO: COPIES TO: Via Project File Jeff Muir Culver City BY: Jonathan Wicks PROJECT NAME: Culver City Parking Management RFP # 1596 PROJECT NUMBER: SUBJECT: Addendum # 2 To All, Attached below are the questions submitted and the answers provided by the City of Culver City with regard to the captioned Request for Proposal. No further questions will be answered at this time. Proposals are due May 12, 2016 before 5:00 PM. Electronic copies are to be submitted to Jonathan Wicks of Walker Parking only. Hard copies of Addendum # 2 will not be issued. Thank you, Jonathan Wicks Walker Parking Consultants Page 1 of 12

2 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 2 General Questions: 1. Are ads permitted on the parking tickets? Response: Tickets do not currently have advertising and no advertising is located in any of the parking structures. City may be open to ads at some point in the future but it has not been considered up to this point and this would likely require changes to the City s Municipal Code regarding off-site advertising. 2. Is there a current elevator maintenance agreement in place and what is the current rate? Response: There is an elevator maintenance and repair agreement with an elevator company that expires on January 31, Is there a current Parking Equipment maintenance agreement in place and what is the current rate? Response: The current Amano PARCS are at the end of their usable life. There is no maintenance program currently and repairs are made as needed when parts are available. 4. Is there a current Charging Station maintenance agreement in place and what is the current rate? Response: Maintenance of the charging stations is the responsibility of the vendor, not the operator. 5. Do you anticipate any increase in the number of Charging Station spaces? Response: The City strives to meet the needs of the community. There is no plan to expand existing EVCS but if demand increases in the future, the City is amenable to additional stations. 6. Is a current copy of the collective bargaining agreement available and whom do we obtain it from? Response: There is no CBA currently for parking employees. 7. Per the union agreement are current employees required to be offered a job to remain at the facility? If so what current employees would be offered a chance to move by the current company and would not be retained at this facility? Response: There is no CBA currently for parking employees and no requirement to retain existing staff. 8. Do you anticipate any changes in the revenue equipment in the near future and if so for which facilities? Response: Yes, all facilities will receive a PARCS upgrade within the next calendar year. 9. Are the current revenues and expenses available for each facility? Response: The following table represent revenues according to the City s accounting system for all structures and monthly parking locations: FY15-16 Budget FY14-15 FY13-14 Non-Transient Parking (665,000.00) (595,575.01) (895,355.36) Transient Parking (620,000.00) (783,388.50) (712,790.00) Page 2 of 12

3 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 3 For expenses, the City is relying on the operator to provide best practices for staffing per the scope of services requested in the RFP. Because of the anticipated change in the method of operation for the parking structure, historical methods cannot be relied upon. Financial information can also be found in the City s Adopted Budget at Are you satisfied with the current condition of the garages and the maintenance of them? Response: The garages have transitioned from their original Redevelopment Agency owner to the City. As such, the City is aware of deferred maintenance items which require attention and we are currently addressing them as we progress and as funding is identified. 11. Who is required to maintain the lighting in the facilities? Is there any maintenance agreement in place and what is the cost? Response: The successful bidder will be responsible for replacing lamps in the garages. Public Works will provide all necessary luminaires 12. Who is required to maintain the fire extinguishers and fire systems in the facilities? Is there any maintenance agreement in place and what is the cost? Response: The successful operator will be required to maintain the fire extinguishers in the garages. 13. Since a re- stripe of each facility is required each year when did the last re-stripe take place? Response: There is no defined schedule for restriping. The City restripes as and when needed. Please see Question # When did the last rate increase occur for each facility? Response: City Council approved a rate increase in March 2016 and it will become effective on May 2, What are the current valet assisted hours and how many spaces and employees are involved? Do you see this increasing or decreasing? Response: There is no valet assist currently. This will increase in the future based on demand and with construction of a new city parking facility at 9300 Culver Boulevard over the next year and construction that requires temporary replacement parking at Ince Parking Structure. 16. Page 24 Performance Based Management Fee Operator will indicate... maximum percentage rate proposed to share with Owner... Is this percentage to be the amount Operator wishes to retain, for example, 5%, or the amount Owner (City) will get, 95%, using the same example? The confusion lies in that the Operator isn t truly banking, sharing or keeping any of the revenue. Response: The intent of the Performance Based Management fee is to increase revenues year over year. As such, the operator should bid on what percentage increase of net revenue, year over year, they wish to retain. 17. What parking access and revenue control system (PARCS) is presently in place at each of the facilities, and when were the (approximate) installation dates? Please Page 3 of 12

4 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 4 provide a description, and quantity, of the equipment present at each facility, i.e., fee computer, ticket dispenser, gate arm, etc. Response: Operators are welcome to confirm existing conditions within each parking structure. Amano PARCS at each facility range from years in operation. 18. What parking access and revenue control system (PARCS) is proposed for installation at each of the facilities, and when will be the (approximate) installation dates? Please provide a description, and quantity, of the equipment planned, or proposed, for each facility, i.e., pay-on-foot station, pay-in-lane cc, ticket dispenser, gate arm, etc. Response: The PARCS RFP is pending publication. The proposed upgraded PARCS will be fully automated with POF method of operation. The City expects award and installation of PARCS to be completed before the end of the 2016 calendar year. 19. Can we be provided with present staffing schedules, for all positions? Response: See Attachment # Can we be provided with daily shift reports, for each facility, for a sample week in March 2016? Response: See Attachment #1-1. No further information will be provided. 21. Can we have copies of any audits, or operational analyses, performed in the last 10 years? 22. Can we have the last 12 months of the incumbent operator s P&L, or Monthly, Statements? 23. What are the daily and hourly activity levels tickets issued/collected for each facility? Response: Monthly occupancy figures are provided in Attachment #1-2. Also see Attachment #1-3 for a sample daily ticket summary for March 1 st through 7 th. Operator is encouraged to verify this information themselves. 24. What are the present parking rates, and what are the City s plans for rate increases? Response: Current posted rates are available at: The City Council approved rate increase becomes effective May 2, Will the City entertain the idea of adding on-street collection and enforcement to the Operator s responsibilities? Response: This is not a consideration at this time. 26. Will the City provide bidders with a copy of the Pre-Bid Conference sign-in sheet(s)? Response: Yes, the sign in sheet is Attachment #2 to this addendum. 27. Does the equipment and furnishings in the parking office belong to the city, or operator? Response: They belong to the City. 28. Does the City of Culver City have a Living Wage Ordinance? 29. Page 3 of the RFP asks for an hourly cost to provide permit management service on a fully-loaded man-hour reimbursable basis. Would this be a clerical or supervisor position? Page 4 of 12

5 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 5 Response: The operator is encouraged to propose the best fit for this position. 30. In regards to a fully-loaded man-hour reimbursable billing rate for Valet-Assist Parking Attendant, are we correct that this would only be within the garage(s) when additional capacity may be required? This would not apply to curb-side valet services, correct? Response: That is correct. 31. Do any large retail properties, i.e., Trader Joes, have special relationships, or rates, with the parking operation? Response: Trader Joe s customers have access to ±45 short-term spaces (45 minutes) on the ground floor of the Ince garage at the City rate. The Culver Hotel and the Southern California Hospital at Culver City have access to approximately 200 spaces in the parking garages at a reduced rate Culver Boulevard (Parcel B) will have 317 stalls of parking at the Ince garage. 32. Approximately how many events presently occur per year that would necessitate valet-assist services? Response: Currently there is not enough demand to warrant valet assist services. This is expected to change on a temporary basis once the Ivy Station Metro development and Parcel B projects commence and permanently in the new City parking garage at 9300 Culver Boulevard upon completion. 33. What brand of Citywide Parking Guidance System is planned for the facilities? Response: The City has yet to make the PGS award. 34. Will there be web-based real time parking availability for the public? Response: Yes, with the implementation of the PGS, this info will be available to the public. 35. Is the City under a living wage ordinance or collective bargaining agreement? 36. Can you provide the current number of staff by position and hours worked? Response: See Attachment # Would you like for us to propose a budget for automation? Response: The successful bidder should propose a budget with the expectation that automation will be implemented before the end of the 2016 calendar year. 38. For banking, is this an owner account or operator account Response: All revenues will be banked in City accounts. 39. Once Credit Cards are accepted who will be responsible for PCI Compliance? Response: The selected Operator will be required to provide credit card terminals in the structures until the PARCS equipment is installed. Credit Card transactions will be processed with the operator as merchant, with revenues then deposited into a City account. 40. Are there any EV Stations in place today? Plans to add and/or expand? Response: Please see Question # Will there be a comprehensive signage and graphics package as part of the new equipment? Response: This is under consideration. 42. How many tickets are run through each location annually? Page 5 of 12

6 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 6 Response: Cardiff - 549,902; Watseka - 298,162 & Ince -1,033,947. See Attachment #1-2 for a monthly occupancy summary. Also see Attachment #1-3 for a sample daily ticket summary for March 1 st through 7 th. Please see Question # Although the RFP states we need to power sweep monthly what is the current rate of frequency? Response: Power sweeping is performed monthly. 44. Is an Armored Car Service in place? If so, who is the contract with and what is the frequency? 45. What will the new rates be once implement in May? Response: 1 hour of free parking, then $1 per 30 minutes and a daily max of $ For Equipment Maintenance for the first year it will be under warranty are there plans to have a service contract in years 2 & 3? If so, is there a budget estimate or should we leave that open depending on the vendor selected? Response: The PARCS RFP will have an add alternate for equipment maintenance in years Once the automation is installed and facilities go 24/7, will the City require Security presence in evening? Response: This is a consideration. 48. Would the City be open to allow the Operator to invest in the automated equipment and amortize it over the duration of the contract? 49. During high demand hours/ days would the City be open to have the Operator provide full valet service? Response: Yes. 50. If the demand justifies a change of rate, would the City be comfortable that the Operator is able to adjust rates accordingly to maximize revenue? Response: Operator may propose semi-annual or annual rate adjustments. However, all rates must be approved by City Council. 51. Operator has a long time experience providing customers/ guests with great customer service but also being focused that the service is highly effective and efficient and therefore we have experience in offering customers/ guests the option of pre-purchasing their parking tickets for example for events/ shows and special occasions. Would the City be interested in incorporating the option of pre-selling parking passes, which may especially be beneficial considering the venues and theatres in the area? Response: Yes. 52. Could you provide a current schedule of employees by day and hours. Response: See Attachment #1-1. Please see Questions #19 and # Could you share a recent ticket summary for each location showing the number of tickets issued/collected per day and the number of "free" tickets. Response: See attachment #1-2 for a monthly occupancy summary. Also see Attachment #1-3 for a sample daily ticket summary for March 1 st through 7 th. Please see Question #42. Page 6 of 12

7 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE Does the City has an idea of the number of tickets that are currently "free" that will go away with the new rate structure? Response: The City feels a 1/3 reduction in free tickets is a reasonable assumption. 55. Would you like us to provide two (2) Form A's with our proposal, one with current operations and one with full automation? Or should we just assume it will be full automation when the contract starts? Response: In order for the City to manage expected cost during the parking system transition, please provide Form A responses for current method of operation in Year 1 and for the anticipated fully automated with Pay-on-Foot method of operation in Years 2 and On Form G, can we add or delete to what is currently shown on the form? Response: Yes. 57. On the selection criteria, is there a weighted amount/% for each category? Response: Out of 100 possible points, selection criteria will rank as follows: Operator background references, financial stability, list of current high profile operations near Culver City 25 Operations Plan, Expenses Budget, Marketing/Customer Service Plan 20 Competency of proposed manager and In-direct Supervision, price, including proposed management fee, worker's compensation, liability and GKLL insurance rates and SUTA rate 20 Oral Presentation and Interview The staffing schedule on Form G, is that based on current operations? Do we need to provide our recommendations after it's automated? Response: Yes. 59. Could we get the current staffing schedules separated by each garage? Response: See Attachment #1-1. Please see Questions #19 and # On staffing schedule, it listed 2 people under Customer Service. What is the responsibilities of this position? Response: The successful bidder should propose on their best practice. 61. There is no Maintenance Person under staffing schedule and there are requirements to perform maintenance. Please advise. Response: The successful operator should propose their best practices. Staffing Form G can be adjusted as needed. 62. Could we get a list of all parking rates (transient & monthlies) for all facilities? Page 7 of 12

8 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 8 Response: Please see Question #24 and /find/parking/lease-business-parking. 63. Are the locations union and if so, could we get the union agreement? Response: Not applicable. 64. Could you give us the average # of monthly parkers where we need to manage the permit parking? Response: The approximate number of monthly parkers is: Ince 436; Cardiff 20; Watseka 193, and approximately 225 spaces at several surface lots. Because some customers pay for multiple spaces, the approximate current number of customers for May 2016 for the various locations is: Ince 50, Cardiff 11, Watseka 8, surface lots Who does the current operator uses for graffiti removal service and weekly power sweeping & annual degreasing? Response: Current vendor is not applicable. 66. Could we get a list of all outside contracts with current operators? Response: None. 67. Can you provide any insight on outside valet agreements in place for the structures or lots (i.e Restaurants, Hotels, stores) Response: None. 68. Can you provide staffing schedules for each location and existing pay rates? Response: See Attachment #1-1. Please see Questions #19 and #36. Pay rates will not be provided. 69. In the RFP, there is reference to a collective bargaining agreement, yet we were told the project is non-union. Can you please clarify? Response: There is no CBA currently. 70. Are revenues, including credit cards, deposited with operator or in a City account? Response: All revenues will be deposited into City accounts. 71. Are DSL and phone lines for equipment and office contracted by operator or the City? Response: By the City 72. Do you currently have armored car services? (Listed in Form A) 73. Would it be possible to obtain parking plans for each of the parking facilities? Response: Layouts will not be provided as part of this RFP. Operator is encouraged to confirm existing conditions onsite. 74. Has there been any third party audit in the last 2 years and if so, can you please provide? Response: Yes third party audits have been completed in the last 2 years but they will not be provided as part of this RFP. 75. Would an extension regarding the proposal due date be considered? Response: The due date is being changed to May 12, How would changes to the Federal, State, or Local Minimum Wage be handled? There is currently a bill under consideration at the State level that could become Page 8 of 12

9 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE 9 effective January 1, 2017, if approved. We would not anticipate that this change would be approved before the conclusion of this RFP process. Response: Operator must comply with all City, State, and Federal law. 77. Please provide revenue and expenses for the existing operation by facility for the prior two (2) years (fiscal or calendar). Response: Please see Question # Please provide occupancy reports (detailing visitor and monthly parkers) for each facility for the prior two (2) years (fiscal or calendar). Response: See Attachment # Please provide total number of transient parking transactions (tickets processed) per facility for the prior year (fiscal or calendar). Response: See Attachment # Will any City-owned equipment be made available for the operator to perform the required services for the operations and maintenance of the parking facilities, or does all equipment need to be itemized as startup expenses? If any City-owned equipment is provided, please provide an itemized list per facility. Response: City will own all PARCS and PGS hardware, software, and work stations. City also owns all furniture and equipment in the Ince Parking Garage office. 81. Form A does not appear to include a line-item for labor expenses associated with valet assist. Should this be added below the total operating expense budget as a hourly labor rate? Response: Please add positions as needed on Forms A and G. Be sure to keep formulas intact. 82. Are City dumpsters available for the contractor to use either in the parking facilities or within close proximity? If so, will the contractor be responsible for any fees associated with the use of City dumpsters? Response: City dumpsters will be available and the City maintains the dumpster areas. 83. Please confirm that the contractor should include pricing for restriping each facility on an annual basis as outlined in section 3.03 c Maintenance Requirements? Response: Striping to be performed as directed. 84. Pg. 3 - #6 Provide hourly cost to provide permit management services on a fully loaded man-hour reimbursement basis. Can you please elaborate on the expectation for this item and/or provide a calculation or base number of annual hours so that all proposers are comparable? Response: Operator should bid on at least 1 full time administrator/ clerk. 85. Will the new PARCs maintenance contract run through the parking contract? Response: The PARCS RFP has yet to be awarded but operator can assume a 1 year warranty with 2 5 year maintenance agreement. 86. Will the elevator maintenance contracts run through the parking contract? If so how many elevator-cars does the system have? Response: The system has five elevator cars: Ince 3, Watseka 1 and Cardiff Does the City want to see the GKLL insurance charges for the valet assist program included in the facility budget or have it included in the proposed man-hour rate? Response: Include in the proposed man-hour rate. Page 9 of 12

10 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE Can the City please provide the number of monthly key card accounts per facility? Response: Please see Question # Can the City please provide the total number of monthly cardholders by facility? Response: Please see Question # Can the City please provide the current staffing schedule of the existing operator? Response: See Attachment #1-1. Please see Questions #19 and # Are the existing employees unionized? 92. Article 3.08 Staffing, second paragraph, Operators are requested not to deviate from the number of staff members and annual number of hours included in its proposed staffing schedule " Q1). None of the provided forms cite a particular number of annual labor hours. Can the City please provide? Q2). If in our determination, 14 front line employees are not enough to provide adequate service to the City, how should proposers address in their proposed budget? Response: The City is relying on the operator to provide best practices for staffing per the scope of services requested in the RFP. Because of the anticipated change in the method of operation for the parking structure, historical methods cannot be relied upon. 93. Please confirm whether the future development locations operational costs are or are not to be included in the submitted budget (Parcel B & West Washington Garage). If they are to be included please note in which month, of the 36-month base term, the facilities are to come online. Response: Costs do not need to be included in the submitted budget. The RFP requests labor for future development to be provided in a fully loaded man hour rate. 94. What is the current PARCS equipment - age, make, model, and software version? Response: Amano PARCS ranging from years in age. 95. Does the current equipment support bar code for 3rd party credentials? 96. What is the current brand of the EVC and what was the last FY maintenance expenses associated with the EVC? Response: evgo Installed in July/August 2015, and is maintained by the vendor. 97. What are the last three years revenues; monthly, events, transient? Response: Only the following table is available from the City s accounting records: FY15-16 Budget FY14-15 FY13-14 Non-Transient Parking (665,000.00) (595,575.01) (895,355.36) Transient Parking (620,000.00) (783,388.50) (712,790.00) 98. What are the last three years expenses; payroll and operating expenses? Please provide the historical expenses by facility if possible. Response: The City is relying on the operator to provide best practices for staffing per the scope of services requested in the RFP. Because of the anticipated change in the method of operation for the parking structure, historical methods cannot be relied upon. Page 10 of 12

11 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE Is the current contractor financing any equipment on behalf of the City and will there be a payoff to be assumed by a new contractor? 100. On Page 6, item H requires maintenance of Electric Vehicle Charging Station. What type of maintenance will be required as part of this RFP? Response: The EVC is maintained by the vendor at its expense, not the operator Are all the locations included on Page 6, item (b), a h, to be included on Form A? Response: Please see Question # How should employee vacation, sick pay, and holiday pay be calculated in Form A? Response: Use the following line items as appropriate: Payroll Tax & Fringe Benefits Payroll Taxes Health/Welfare/Benefits Workers' Compensation 103. On Page 7, Section 3.03 (c), it states that degreasing will take place annually. In Section3.03 (f) it states that power washing will be done on a bi annual basis. Typically, these are the same type of service, so how often is the frequency of the service? Response: Power washing is done on a monthly basis and steam cleaning is done once every six months On Page 24, Other Fees states that there are 2,060 spaces. Note 3 on Form E, states that there are 2,631 spaces. Which number should be used for this RFP? Response: 2,060 stalls comprise the base bid What time are the proposals due? Response: Submittals are due by 5:00 PM on the due date Are the list of exceptions required in both the financial proposal and the alternate proposal? Response: If exceptions vary based on proposal type, please list each separately Will the collection of daily parking fees at the City Hall garage begin after the PARCS automation has been installed? If before, since there is no current service, is there a preferred operating hours and start date? Response: Paid parking at the City Hall garage will begin with the installation and implementation of the new PARCS The frequency of striping is often preference by property owners which is usually once every three years. The RFP in 3.03 c) indicates possibly annual as directed. Is there a forecast for the frequency of this service that can be provided in order for the bidding and service to be consistent? Response: Restriping will be required once every three years or as needed Will the trash hauler (waste management) for any of the garages be part of the City cost or Operator? If operator, what is the current cost for trash container services for each of the facilities? Response: City cost. Page 11 of 12

12 PROJECT NUMBER: PAGE Hours of Operation Will the current operating hours stay in place (pay on exit) until the PARCS automation is implemented and then be continued on a 24 hour basis? If so, should one of the proposals be for existing and the other of alternative? If not, which facilities are required to be manned and operated on a 24 hour basis? Response: Yes, current operating hours will remain in effect until the installation of the upgraded PARCS. Proposals should assume fully automated method of operation In section 3.0 Scope of Services item G indicates the operator will ensure both the maintenance and janitorial services. In 3.03 Maintenance Requirements indicated the listed items are Operator s responsibility. Some of the work is currently provided under the guidance and term contract with the City. Is there a requirement for the operators to obtain all of the specific services listed for bidding as indicated in the RFP or only partial items? Response: Yes, all of the services are to be provided by the operator Section 1.02 item 7 calls for a fully loaded hourly cost for attendant service. Form D item 8 calls for the service to be included in Form A. This is somewhat confusing as Form A budget includes both direct and indirect labor cost. Should the fully loaded cost be listed in a particular section of form A? Should the total valet labor hours be projected based on a time line starting 6 months, 1 year, 2 year period as various garages come on line? What measure for operating hours and capacity should be assumed for valet stacking in order for competitive comparison? Response: Assume valet assist labor costs on an on-call basis The RFP section 3.0 Item b. indicates that all monthly parking fees will be collected by the operator, which is transitioning from the City to the Operator current status. In section 1.02 item 6 there is a request to provide hourly cost to provide permit management for the other facilities some of which will not come onboard for a period of time. Since there will be administration change to services the main facilities 1 thru 7 in this section which labor expense will need to be included in normal business activity, it would make sense that the permit issuance of would be simply be added on to the new duties of administrative management and will most probably be a minor expense based on time involvement and future capacity changes. Is the fully loaded hourly cost to be included in Form A? If so, where should it be it be listed and in what format? Should the labor hours be projected to increase over time as the new developments may not come on line for a couple of years? If the additional permit duties is anticipated by the operator to be included in an administrative position, should the total hours from a clerk be reduced for this particular permit duty and then listed separately on an hourly basis fully loaded? Response: Operator may adjust staffing on forms as needed and should bid their practice in administrating the requested services. End of Addendum #2 Page 12 of 12

13 Attachment #1-1 Nos. 19 & 36 Cardiff Booth 1 Sun - Thu 8:00 am - 1:30 am Booth 1 Fri/Sat 8:00 am - 2:30 am Watseka Booth 1 Sun - Thu 8:00 am - 1:30 am Booth 1 Fri/Sat 8:00 am - 2:30 am Ince Booth 1 Sun - Thu 8:00 am - 1:30 am Booth 1 Fri/Sat 8:00 am - 2:30 am Booth 2 Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 7:00 pm Booth 2 Sat/Sun 9:00 am - 12:00 am Booth 3 Sun - Thu 2:00 pm - 11:00 pm Booth 3 Fri/Sat 3:00 pm - 12:00 am Office/Maintenance Manager Mon - Fri 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Assistant Manager Wed - Sun 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Supervisors Mon - Sun 5:00 pm - 2:00 am Maitenance Mon - Sun 7:00 am - 4:00 pm

14 Attachment #1-2 #78 Occupancy Report Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Visitors 2014 Cardiff 47,899 42,135 47,599 42,421 49,283 48,746 48,046 47,999 43,634 46,724 42,545 41, ,191 Watseka 22,690 21,728 25,750 24,193 25,907 25,261 24,501 25,797 22,928 23,197 22,013 20, ,847 Ince 85,902 78,749 85,911 82,023 88,798 86,858 85,323 86,584 82,967 90,827 84,229 81,343 1,019,514 Total 156, , , , , , , , , , , ,385 1,852, Cardiff 46,550 42,544 46,362 40,382 46,562 48,095 47,923 47,391 85,705 46,863 42,553 42, ,424 Watseka 24,258 23,388 25,680 23,503 25,814 26,186 26,166 26,616 24,960 25,706 23,250 22, ,674 Ince 87,687 82,581 88,052 78,281 87,296 85,863 86,800 90,325 85,705 92,320 85,066 83,971 1,033,947 Total 158, , , , , , , , , , , ,612 1,915,045 Monthly Cardiff 20 Watseka 193 Ince 436

15 Attachment #1-3 Ticket Summary 1-Mar 2-Mar 3-Mar 4-Mar 5-Mar 6-Mar 7-Mar Cardiff Issued 1,538 1,450 1,519 1,778 1,832 1,574 1,087 Collected 1,533 1,455 1,513 1,776 1,831 1,573 1,088 Free 1, ,030 1, Watseka Issued Collected Free Ince Issued 2,877 2,683 2,632 2,968 3,189 3,282 2,930 Collected 2,855 2,658 2,599 2,926 3,166 3,268 2,903 Free 2,487 2,214 2,131 2,286 2,543 2,854 2,648

16 ATTACHMENT #2

17