IRWM Plan Update Quarter 4 Status Report, 2013 Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South Monterey Bay Grant Agreement No.

Transcription

1 Invoice No. 8 Quarterly Report (October 1 December 31, 2013) Contents s 1 16, Update the IRWM Plan and Grant Administration...3 Project 1 Canyon Del Rey Master Drainage Plan Update...6 Project 2 Seaside Groundwater Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan...6 Project 3 Assessment of Steelhead Passage Barriers in Portions of Four Tributaries to the Carmel River Main Stem...8 Project 4a Geographic Information Systems Internet Mapping Site Development...8 Project 4b Document Management System Portal...10 Project 5 Inter Regional Coordination...11 Project 6 Assessment for San Jose Creek Watershed...12 Project 7 City of Monterey and Pacific Grove ASBS Refined 2006 Feasibility Study of Alternatives Management Plan...13 Project 8 Development of a Surface and Groundwater Model for the Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer...14 Project 9 Feasibility of Scenic Road Protection and Preservation with Proposed Carmel River Lagoon Ecosystem Protective Barrier...15 Executive Summary Work in this quarter focused on: 3 Objectives: A final draft of the objectives chapter was completed. 6 Project Review: Completing a draft of the IRWM Plan chapter. 7 Impacts and Benefits: Writing a portion of the IRWM Plan chapter. 8 Plan Performance and Monitoring: Completing a draft of the IRWM Plan chapter. 10 Finance: Writing a portion of the IRWM Plan chapter. 11 Technical Analysis: Writing a portion of the IRWM Plan chapter. s 1 16 (IRWM Plan Update) Summary: Expenses were $5,563 for 52.5 hours of work. The project is within budget, but an amendment was requested to allocate additional funds for certain tasks. No local match is required. The project is expected be completed in the 2nd Quarter of All grant funds for these tasks are expected to be expended. Project 1 Canyon Del Rey Master Drainage Plan Update: The final report and attachments were completed for this project. Reimbursable expenses were $46,043 for 315 hours of work. The project is expected to meet the local match requirement and is likely to be completed for less than the budgeted grant funds amount. Project 2 Seaside Groundwater Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan: work included outreach to stakeholders and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, establishment of Basin Characteristics, identification of existing and foreseeable salt sources, preparation of a salt and nutrient loading evaluation, and preparation of report materials. There are no known Page 1 of 15

2 issues with moving forward with this project. No reimbursement for expenses is being requested with this report. This project is currently within budget and is expected to expend all grant funds. The local match has been met for this project. Work on this project is anticipated to conclude by March 1, Project 3 Assessment of Steelhead Passage Barriers in Portions of Four Tributaries to the Carmel River Main Stem: An overview of barriers in each tributary was completed. The project is expected to be completed by June 1, Reimbursable expenses were $4,512 for 48 hours of work. The project will be completed for less than the budgeted amount (a budget amendment will be requested). Project 4a Geographic Information Systems: Limited meetings with stakeholders have been extended to the beginning of first quarter of 2014 as part of the specific project sites development. A final web page and web mapping site are being implemented and tested. The project schedule has been extended to provide assistance to stakeholders as required to complete the IRWM Plan update. Reimbursable expenses were $4,611 for 53 hours of work. This project is currently within budget, is expected to meet the local match requirement, and will expend all grant funds. Project 4b Document Management System Portal: The IRWM web site was monitored for project submittals and technical support was provided to stakeholders with submitting concept proposals and with submitting more detailed proposals for prioritization. Additional functionality was requested to score and rank projects, based on stakeholder submissions. Alternate software tools for exporting data are being evaluated to facilitate project ranking analysis. Reimbursable expenses were $12,293 for 119 hours of work. Overall, this project is currently within budget and is expected to meet the local match requirement. MPWMD will request a budget amendment to reallocate funds to reflect actual expenses among tasks. The project schedule has been extended to accommodate stakeholder needs as required to complete the IRWM Plan update. Project 5 Inter Regional Coordination: No work or expenses occurred. Project work is expected to be completed in the 2 nd quarter of The project is within budget and is expected to expend all grant funds. A budget amendment should be completed to reflect the absence of any DACs within the Ord Community area. Project 6 Assessment of San Jose Creek Watershed: No report was provided by the subgrantee (Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District). This project is behind schedule. No reimbursement requests for this project have been received. MPWMD has informed the subgrantee that the funding agreement may be terminated with no reimbursement for expenses unless a quarterly report is filed in a timely manner. Project 7 ASBS Alternatives Analysis: Work performed this quarter included 1,051 hours for initial design investigations, preliminary costs estimates, and preparation of environmental review documents. A Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR was issued October 10, Expenditures to date are in line with the budget and work is currently on schedule. All grant funds are expected to be expended. Due to an incorrect invoice format, City of Monterey staff Page 2 of 15

3 expenses for the quarter are not included with this invoice. These staff expenses will be invoiced in the future. There are no other known issues with this project. Project 8 Development of a Surface and Groundwater Model for the Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer: MPWMD completed a review of the final report for this project. No expenses were incurred during the period. The project was completed within budget and on schedule. Results showed that although the existing main frame computer model of the basin (Carmel Valley Simulation Model or CVSIM) yielded basin scale hydrologic information, the operational (water supply system) and groundwater components did not result in a realistic model of surface flow in the Carmel River. The best suited model for the Carmel River basin is GSFLOW, which was developed by the USGS to simulate coupled groundwater/surface water flow in one or more watersheds by simultaneously simulating flow across the land surface and within subsurface saturated and unsaturated materials. The results of this analysis will be presented in the IRWM Plan. Subsequent to completion of this work, MPWMD recently authorized up to $128,000 to fund development of the recommended GSFLOW model for the Carmel River watershed. The model is expected to take about two years to complete and will be used to answer questions about how the watershed and river responds to various levels of water extraction. Project 9 Feasibility of Scenic Road Protection and Preservation with Proposed Carmel River Lagoon Ecosystem Protective Barrier: No quarterly report was provided by the sub grantee (County of Monterey); however, it is apparent that project work is complete and that all grant funds have been expended. MPWMD has requested additional documentation of expenses in the format required for reimbursement, but there has been no response from the sub grantee. MPWMD will work with the sub grantee to finalize a report. Overall Schedule: Work is progressing more slowly than expected due to work on project prioritization. MPWMD has requested an extension of the planning grant agreement to June 30, Overall Budget: The invoice associated with this quarter s report reflects a total of 1,720 hours worked. Total expenses for the quarter are $214,655 and to date are $1,088,346 or about 67% of the original total project costs. The Grant share billed for the quarter is $143,309 and the total to date is $615,927 about 62% of total grant funds. Project costs are within budget; however, MPWMD will request a budget amendment to reallocate funds both among tasks for individual projects and among projects. MPWMD submitted a proposed budget change in March 2014 for this purpose. Issues: Some projects may not expend all grant funds or need budget adjustments to reflect actual expenses for tasks. Completion of all projects is expected to be within budget, but some reallocation may be necessary. MPWMD submitted a proposed budget adjustment in March MPWMD followed up on Project 6 San Jose Creek Assessment with the sub grantee, who submitted several previous quarterly reports. MPWMD will report on this with the 1 st quarter, 2014 report. s 1 16, Update the IRWM Plan and Grant Administration 1. Summary Page 3 of 15

4 Work focused on project review and prioritization. Several chapters in the IRWM Plan update are nearing completion. Expenses for the period were $11,490 for hours of work. The schedule has been revised to reflect an extension of the planning grant agreement to June 30, Budget changes may be proposed as part of an overall budget amendment (to be submitted) to allocate additional funds to Climate Change adaptation and stakeholder involvement. 2. Report Status a) Work Performed: 1 Regional Water Management Group the City of Monterey and the Resource Conservation District of Monterey County executed an amended MOU. 6 Project Review: Stakeholders submitted nine concept proposals and seven projects for project review process and prioritization. MPWMD and its consultant worked to review and consolidate the project submittals. 7 Impacts and Benefits: Work begun. 12 Relation to Local Water Plan: A draft chapter for the IRWM plan was posted to the website for review. 13 Relation to Local Land Use Planning: A draft chapter for the IRWM plan was posted to the website for review. 15 Climate Change: A portion of the Climate Change chapter for IRWM plan was completed. b) Accomplishments: Completed the project prioritization and Climate Change sections. c) Issues: none d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: 1) completion of Draft IRWM Plan update; 2) post draft IRWM Plan to website. 3. Cost Information a) Cost incurred: Expenses for the period were $11,490 for hours of work. b) Budget comparison: the project is within budget. c) A revision may be proposed to allocate additional funds for stakeholder involvement to comment on Climate Change and the RIWM Plan update. 4. Schedule see changes below. No. Description Duration (days) Start Finish February 10, 2014 update Page 4 of 15

5 ES - Revise Executive Summary/Introduction /1/ RWMG Governance /1/ /1/2013 Revised MOU circulated. MPWMD approved revision at April 2013 meeting. 2. Regional Description /1/2011 Draft Chapter posted for comments Oct Objectives /1/2011 Draft Chapter posted for comments Oct Resource Management Strategies /1/2011 Draft Chapter posted for comments Oct Integration /1/2012 To be completed after project submittal. Project submittal complete as of Oct. 1, Project Review Process /1/2011 To be completed after project submittal. Project submittal complete as of Oct. 1, Impacts and Benefits /1/2012 To be completed after project submittal. Project submittal complete as of Oct. 1, Plan Performance and Monitoring /1/ Data Management /1/ Finance /1/ Technical Analysis - Feasibility /1/ Relation to Local Water Planning /1/2012 Draft Chapter posted for comments Sept Relation to Local Land Use Planning /1/2012 Draft Chapter posted for comments Sept Stakeholder Involvement /1/2011 Draft IRWM Plan update with project prioritization review meeting to be held in November 2013 May Climate Change /1/2011 Draft section complete. 16. Grant Administration /1/2011 Page 5 of 15

6 Project 1 - Canyon Del Rey Master Drainage Plan Update 1. Summary: A runoff model was completed for the watershed using a combination of HEC HMS for most of the basin and HEC RAS at complex transitions. An update of precipitation estimates is nearly complete. Additional analysis of basin sediments and historical analysis was performed. The project is on track to be completed in the 1st Quarter of Total expenses were $46,063 for 315 hours of work. The project is expected to meet the local match requirement and is likely to be completed for less than the budgeted grant funds amount. 2. Report Status: a) Work Performed: Most of the work focused on estimating existing flows with the HEC HMS and HEC RAS models. Work was also performed on sediment analysis. b) Accomplishments: Initial drafts of lake bathymetry were completed and storm drain maps were obtained for Seaside, Del Rey Oaks and the Monterey Peninsula Airport District. c) Issues: The project fell behind schedule. d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: Below normal rainfall throughout the winter and early spring curtailed field measurements (flow, sediment). Work in Q will focus on completing deliverables. 3. Cost Information a) Total expenses were $46,063 for 315 hours of work. b) Budget progression: The project is under budget due to lack of rainfall. c) Budget revision: A revision to the budget has been proposed to DWR. 4. Schedule This project fell behind schedule as shown below. None of the s have been completed. The consultant will be asked for a revised schedule, which will appear in the 4 th quarter report. The project is expected to be completed in the 1 st quarter of Project 1 An update to the Canyon Del Rey drainage plan /1/ /31/2013 6/14/2014 Milestones 1 Update of the hydrologic model 1/10/2013 3/29/ Update Runoff Estimates 3/29/2013 5/21/ Evaluate the effectiveness of the primary drainage facilities in the w atershed 5/31/2013 6/14/ Update Erosion and Sedimentation Rates 7/12/ Project Management 10/31/2013 6/14/2014 Project 2 - Seaside Groundwater Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan 1. Summary The project consultant continued work through the 4th quarter with outreach to stakeholders and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, establishment of Basin Characteristics, identification of existing and foreseeable salt sources, preparation of a salt and nutrient loading evaluation, and preparation of Page 6 of 15

7 report materials. Reimbursable expenses were $0 for 0 hours of consultant work this quarter. There are no known issues with moving forward with this project. This project is currently at budget. 2. Report Status: a) Performed: Work was performed on 1, Stakeholder Outreach and 2, Basin Characteristics, 3, Identification of Existing and Foreseeable Salt and Nutrient Sources, 4, Salt and Nutrient Evaluation, and 6, Prepare Salt and Nutrient Management Plan. b) Accomplishments: Communication with Stakeholders and Regional Water Quality Control Board, completion of Salt loading model for the Seaside Groundwater Basin, and characterization of groundwater basin. c) Issues: None. d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: Evaluation of monitoring network, planning of future monitoring, and creation of database to house data. 3. Cost Information a) Costs incurred: $0 b) Budget progression: The project is within budget. c) Budget revision: N/A 4. Schedule a) Schedule comparison: This project has been delayed. The consultant started work in December b) Schedule discussion: N/A c) Schedule revision: See below. Project 2 Seaside Groundwater Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Length 2280 days 2037 days Start 10/1/2008 Finish 3/1/2014 4/30/2014 MILESTONE 1 Stakeholder Outreach 3/1/2013 3/31/ Establish Basin Characteristics 3/1/2013 3/31/ Identify Existing and Foreseeable Salt and Nutrient Sources 3/1/2013 3/31/ Salt and Nutrient Evaluation 5/21/2013 3/31/ Monitoring Programs and Database 12/31/2013 3/31/ Prepare Salt and Nutrient Management Plan 12/31/2013 4/30/2014 Page 7 of 15

8 Project 3 Assessment of Steelhead Passage Barriers in Portions of Four Tributaries to the Carmel River Main Stem. 4 th Q Summary: Overview assessment reports for barrier sites in each tributary were completed. 2. Report Status a) Work Performed: Overview reports were completed. b) Accomplishments: Overview reports for each tributary were completed. c) Issues: No additional issues. d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: 3.7, data entry and analysis. 3. Cost Information a) Costs incurred: $4, for 48 hours of work. b) Budget progression: This project has approximately $34,500 left in its budget (out of about $124,500). It is estimated that approximately $12,000 will be expended to complete the project. c) Budget revision: A revised budget will be submitted. 4. Schedule a) Schedule comparison: 3 needs to be completed. b) Schedule discussion: This project is currently behind schedule. c) Schedule revision: See below Project 3 Assessment of steelhead passage barriers in four tributaries in the Carmel River Basin Duration (days) 2082 Start 10/1/2008 Finish 12/31/2013 6/14/2014 MILESTONE 1 Obtain access & permission for work 6/31/ Conduct reconnaissance surveys and 12/31/2013 update existing information 3 Detailed barrier assessments (field 6/1/2014 work), data analysis, site ranking, and report 4 Collect and provide streamflow data, WY 2009, 2010, 2011 ongoing Project 4a - Geographic Information Systems Internet Mapping Site Development 1. Summary Project expenditures during this period and previous period are reported. The project is within budget. Limited meetings with stakeholders have been extended to the beginning of first quarter of 2014 as part of the specific project sites development. A final web page and web mapping site are being implemented and tested. 2. Report Status Page 8 of 15

9 a) Work Performed: s 1, 2, 3 & 4 are completed. Additional data mining is now underway for specific project site development and specific data needs. b) Accomplishments: s 5 & 6 of Project 4A are underway. 4, milestone has been met during this quarter. 7 will be initiated and completed next quarter. The Pilot demo web mapping site has been completed. Additional sites are being created using the base functionality of the demo site. Individual customization is anticipated for the final build and fine tuning for project sites. c) Issues: Currently, because of delays in the final approval from stakeholders, the project schedule has been delayed. d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: For next quarter, anticipated work will include s 5 7. At this time, no issues or concerns are anticipated that will affect the schedule or budget. 3. Cost Information a) Costs incurred during the period were $ Costs incurred in the previous period were $1827 for a total of $4,611 for 53 hours of work. b) Budget progression: this project is within budget. c) Budget revision: N/A 4. Schedule Information a) Schedule comparison: There are changes to the schedule for 5 7 milestones (see table below) b) Schedule discussion: Completion of the project by the grant end date () is still anticipated. The schedule is progressing as shown in a Project Schedule below (Table 2). Progress for all s is proceeding accordingly and there are no additional delays are anticipated, at this time. c) Schedule revision: For clarification, the changes for each task on the schedule are shown in red. There are no other revisions at this time. TABLE 2: SCHEDULE GIS DEVELOPMENT TASK TASK NAME Initial meetings Scope Development DURATION START 12/10/2010 FINISH MILESTONE 9/26/13 9/30/13 Sys Requirements & Specs Analysis 9/30/13 QA/QC Process Dev 11/30/13 Sys hardware, database com, & sys analysis 6/30/14 Development & Implementation 6/30/14 Acceptance and Fine Tuning 6/30/14 Page 9 of 15

10 Project 4b - Document Management System Portal 1. Summary The IRWM web site was monitored for project submittals and technical support was provided to stakeholders with submitting concept proposals and with submitting more detailed proposals for prioritization. The DMS portal is an acceptable method for stakeholders to submit information and proposals. Additional functionality has been requested to score and rank projects, based on stakeholder submissions. Alternate software tools for exporting data are being evaluated to facilitate project ranking analysis. Ninety percent of the stated goals of the project have been achieved and additional work is planned in order to evaluate whether the web portal can be modified to achieve additional tasks of the project. 2. Report Status a) Work performed: Stakeholder assistance was provided with submittals to the IRWM web portal. b) Accomplishments: 5 Development, Implementation, Testing, Deployment, Limited Training and Documentation on the Portal System: Work on the setup of the portal system is progressing. Production environment was deployed in Mid March. The web site was used with concept and project proposals. Development is ongoing on the site. Documents and maps are being added. More GIS integration is being added in conjunction with project 4a. Issues defined in last project report are being developed. Programming was done to help make data input more userfriendly. 6 Project Management: Staff is managing the project in house. The IT Manager and GIS staff have been keeping track of work being done. c) Issues: Requested additional functionality, is being evaluated to facilitate project ranking analysis in a user friendly work flow. This was partially done, but more automation is requested. d) Planned activities: Additional hardware is being evaluated to provide backup and system redundancy. More hardware is being evaluated to provide backup in case of power outages or other natural disasters. More programming is planned to provide additional automation for the data input. Methods are being evaluated to submit the final data. Servers and website are being backed up and maintained per recommended best practices. 3. Cost Information a) Costs incurred for the 3 rd and 4 th quarters were $12,293 for 119 hours of work as shown below: Grantee/Subcontractor Hours Cost 4,5,6 Grantee 86 10, Subcontractor 33 2, b) Budget progression: The budget is progressing in line with the proposed Project Budget. c) Budget revision: N/A 4. Schedule Information Page 10 of 15

11 a) Schedule comparison: see table below. b) Schedule discussion: s 1 5 are complete. c) Schedule revision: N/A. Project 4b: UPDATED SCHEDULE TASK TASK NAME DURATION Infrastructure Inventory Report START 12/10/10 (initial) 7/1/10 (revised) FINISH MILESTONE 12/31/2012 3/31/ Systems Requirements Specification Document Detailed Design Specification (DDS) Document Communication and Network Specification Document with Line Item Costs Development, Implementation, Testing, Deployment Project Management 3/31/ /31/13 12/31/2012 6/30/ /31/ /31/ Project 5 - Inter-Regional Coordination between the Greater Monterey County IRWM Plan and the Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South Monterey Bay IRWM Plan 1. Summary No work was completed. 2. Report Status a) Work Performed: none. b) Accomplishments: none c) Issues: The desalination component of Cal Am s proposed Coastal Water Project has been replaced by a new proposal consisting of a different desalination project or a combination of desalination and groundwater replenishment project (GWR) that would use highly purified recycled water for injection into the Seaside Groundwater Basin (indirect potable reuse), which is a potable water supply. The Draft EIR for the desalination component and Phase 1 Proposed Decision addressing certification of the FEIR and issuance of a CPCN are now expected to be published in the 1 st quarter of The GWR Project DEIR will be completed in summer of The CPUC will hold hearings in late 2014 on the GWR Project and has tentatively set early 2015 for a decision on the proposed project. Page 11 of 15

12 d) Planned activities Identify types of projects or programs that could be shared between Greater Monterey County entities and Monterey Peninsula entities. Identify obstacles to inter regional cooperation. 3. Cost Information a) Cost incurred: N/A b) Budget progression: Expenditures are in line with expectations. c) Budget revision: $5,000 allocated to DACs should be changed to $0 (see previous discussion of DACs in Quarter 2, 2012 report) and re allocated to an appropriate Project or. Funds allocated for C Monterey Bay Regional Water Project ($1,200) should be re allocated to D Interregional Prioritization Processes. These changes can be included as part of the proposed budget assessment and possible budget amendment. 4. Schedule a) Schedule comparison: A schedule revision is shown below. b) Schedule discussion: The schedule is progressing as shown in a revised Project Schedule below. c) Schedule revision: See below. PROJECT SCHEDULE No. Description Duration (days) Start Finish Milestone Project 5 Inter regional Coordination /1/ /1/2012 6/14/2013 A Relationship between IRWM Regions 5/1/2013 B Boundary Region 5/1/2013 C Monterey Bay Regional Water Project Suspended D Inter Regional Prioritization Processes 12/31/ /14/2014 Project 6 Assessment for San Jose Creek Watershed No report or invoice was provided by the sub grantee (Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District). This project is behind schedule. No reimbursement requests have been made for this project. MPWMD notified the project proponent that the terms of the sub grantee agreement had not been met and that MPWMD intends to terminate the agreement without any reimbursement of expenses. Sub grantee subsequently provided previous quarterly reports, which will be reported with the Q1, 2014 quarterly report. Page 12 of 15

13 Project 7 - City of Monterey and Pacific Grove ASBS Refined 2006 Feasibility Study of Alternatives Management Plan 1. Summary: Work performed this quarter: A Continued project management and administration B Review of technical assumptions and data Updated Capital Costs C Verification of screening analysis of project alternatives D Refinement of Preliminary Engineering Design E Completed Draft EIR F Initial development for Project Implementation Work Plan 2. Report Status: a. Work Performed See explanation under Summary b. Accomplishments Worked on preliminary plans; Refined project descriptions and cost estimates; Continued working on multi party agreements for project implementation; Continued project analysis on cost and cost effectiveness; Worked on finalizing Draft Environmental Review Documentation; c. Issues none d. Planned Activities for the next reporting period: Continue: Environmental documentation Draft EIR comment period; Continue working on multi party agreements; Complete 40% of preliminary engineering design; Initiating project implementation work plan 3. Cost Information: a. Cost Incurred this quarter were $135,685 for 1,051 hours of work for: A. Project Administration B. Refine Project Alternatives & D. Develop Conceptual Design Plans E. CEQA Environmental review documentation F. Worked on implementation of Work Plan b. Budget Progression: Expenditures are in line with expectations 4. Schedule: a. Schedule comparison: Work is currently on schedule Page 13 of 15

14 Project 7 City of Monterey and Pacific Grove ASBS Alternatives Analysis /10/ /30/ Milestones A Project Administration 11/30/2013 4/1/2014 Send out RFP, review, and aw ard contract B Refine project alternatives. 9/1/ C Select the preferred project 11/1/ D Develop conceptual design plans 2/1/ /2/2014 E Prepare the CEQA environmental review document 6/1/ /01/2014 F Develop project implementation w ork plan. 11/30/ /01/2014 Project 8 Development of a Surface and Groundwater Model for the Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer 1. Summary: This project is complete. No expenses were incurred during the period. 2. Report Status a) Work Performed: N/A b) Accomplishments: N/A. c) Issues: None. d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: N/A. 3. Cost Information: a) This project has met its local match and expended all grant funds. b) Budget progression: the project is within budget c) Budget revisions: N/A 4. Schedule a) Schedule comparison: N/A b) Schedule discussion: N/A c) Schedule revision: N/A Page 14 of 15

15 Project 9 - Feasibility of Scenic Road Protection and Preservation with Proposed Carmel River Lagoon Ecosystem Protective Barrier 1. Summary: No quarterly report was provided by the sub grantee (County of Monterey); project work is complete and all funds have been expended. MPWMD has requested additional documentation of expenses in the format required for reimbursement, but there has been no response from the subgrantee. MPWMD will work with the sub grantee on the final report. 2. Report Status a) Work Performed: N/A b) Accomplishments: N/A. c) Issues: None. d) Planned activities for the next reporting period: N/A. 3. Cost Information: a) This project has no local match; a portion of the grant funds remain to be reimbursed. b) Budget progression: the project is within budget c) Budget revisions: N/A 4. Schedule a) Schedule comparison: N/A b) Schedule discussion: N/A c) Schedule revision: N/A U:\mpwmd\IRWM\2010_Planning_Grant\DWR\Invoices\2013 4Q\QuarterlyReport Q 01April2014.docx Page 15 of 15