Danske Bank A/S. Semi-Annual Update following year-end 2016 Results. CREDIT OPINION 13 April Update

Transcription

1 CREDIT OPINION April 7 Danske Bank A/S Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results Update Summary Rating Rationale We rate A the long-term deposits of Danske Bank A/S (Danske Bank). We also assign a rating of A to the bank s senior unsecured debt and a long-and short-term counterparty risk assessment (CRA) of Aa(cr), Prime(cr) to the bank. Moreover, we assign a positive outlook to Danske Bank A/S's long-term deposit, long-term issuer rating and senior debt ratings. RATINGS Danske Bank A/S Domicile Denmark Long Term Debt A Type Senior Unsecured - Fgn Curr Outlook Positive Long Term Deposit A Type LT Bank Deposits - Fgn Curr Outlook Positive Please see the ratings section at the end of this report for more information. The ratings and outlook shown reflect information as of the publication date. Danske Bank A/S s BCA reflects the progressive strengthening of the bank's performance in recent years following its challenges during the financial crisis, both domestically and abroad. The continued improvements include a strengthening of its asset quality, capitalisation and profitability, as the bank benefits from a balanced and well diversified lending portfolio. Danske Bank's A long-term senior unsecured debt and A deposit ratings take into account the bank's BCA, in conjunction with our view of a low loss-given-failure based on the protection provided to creditors by the group's deposits, senior and subordinated debt, and a moderate likelihood of government support. Exhibit Danske Bank versus Large Nordic Peers Improving asset quality, capitalisation and profitability, as the bank benefits from a balanced and well diversified lending portfolio Analyst Contacts Danske Bank (BCA: ) Alessandro Roccati Senior Vice President alessandro.roccati@moodys.com % Louise Lundberg VP-Sr Credit Officer louise.lundberg@moodys.com 5% Maria Asensio Associate Analyst maria.asensio@moodys.com Jean-Francois Tremblay Associate Managing Director jean-francois.tremblay@moodys.com Sean Marion Managing Director Financial Institutions sean.marion@moodys.com Nordic rated peers 5% % % 5%.% 9.6%.6% 4.7% 9.% % Asset Risk: Problem Loans/ Gross Loans Profitability: Net Funding Structure: Liquid Resources: Liquid Capital: Banking Market Funds/ Tangible Tangible Common Income/ Assets/Tangible Tangible Banking Assets Assets Equity/Risk-Weighted Banking Assets Assets Solvency Factors (LHS) Source: Moody's Banking Financial Metrics Liquidity Factors (RHS) 45% 4% 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% %

2 Credit Strengths and Challenges Danske Bank's BCA is supported by its Strong+ macro profile Improving asset quality, albeit still below Nordic peers Solid and improving capitalisation Profitability is improving, but remains below similarly rated peers High exposure on market funding, in particular covered bonds; liquidity is adequate and refinancing risk is reducing Our advanced LGF analysis indicates a low loss-given-failure, resulting in a two-notch uplift to the long term deposits and a one notch uplift to the senior unsecured debt ratings from the BCA The long term deposit and senior unsecured debt ratings incorporate one notch of government support uplift Rating Outlook The positive outlook on Danske Bank A/S s senior ratings reflects the bank's improvements in financial metrics to date, and the expectation of a continuation of the positive trend. During the outlook period, Moody s will consider whether the recent positive trends in asset quality, capital and profitability are sustainable. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Upward rating pressure could develop from a continuation of the positive trends in the bank s financial performance, including: () an improvement in Moody s asset risk assessment, especially with regards to more volatile segments, such as agriculture and commercial real estate; and () an increase in profitability and reduced earnings volatility, supported by revenues, without a material increase in risk provisioning; () an improvement in the capital leverage position, currently constrained by the large nominal size of the bank s balance sheet. An upward change in the bank s long-term debt and deposit ratings would require upward pressure on its BCA and/or additional loss-absorbing liabilities at group level providing additional notching uplift from our advanced LGF analysis (see also Notching Considerations). Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Downward rating pressure could arise from: () any renewed pressure on asset quality, particularly in one of the bank's core markets; () any indication that the firm will not deliver the anticipated improvement in profitability; or () any sign that the improvements achieved in recent years are not sustainable. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

3 Key Indicators Exhibit Danske Bank A/S (Consolidated Financials) [] Total Assets (DKK million) Total Assets (EUR million) Total Assets (USD million) Tangible Common Equity (DKK million) Tangible Common Equity (EUR million) Tangible Common Equity (USD million) Problem Loans / Gross Loans (%) Tangible Common Equity / Risk Weighted Assets (%) Problem Loans / (Tangible Common Equity + Loan Loss Reserve) (%) Net Interest Margin (%) PPI / Average RWA (%) Net Income / Tangible Assets (%) Cost / Income Ratio (%) Market Funds / Tangible Banking Assets (%) Liquid Banking Assets / Tangible Banking Assets (%) Gross loans / Due to customers (%) Avg.,4,7 46,4 459,898 59,68,47, ,55,864 49, ,86 54,76,7, ,5,89 4,4 5,4 4,444 8,995, ,5,84 48,98 56,49 5,578 6,8, ,79,944 46,4 56,97 8,6 5,898, [] All figures and ratios are adjusted using Moody's standard adjustments [] Basel III - fully-loaded or transitional phase-in; IFRS [] Basel II; IFRS [4] Compound Annual Growth Rate (%). Any interim period amounts presented are assumed to be fiscal year end amounts for calculation purposes [5] Simple average of periods presented [6] Simple average of Basel III periods presented Source: Moody's Financial Metrics Detailed Rating Considerations Danske Bank's BCA is supported by its Strong+ macro profile Danske Bank's Macro Profile is Strong+ and aligned with that of Denmark, on the basis of the weighted average of the bank's credit exposures. The bank s largest credit exposures relate to Denmark (6%, Macro Profile Strong+ ), Sweden (%, Macro Profile Very strong- ), Norway (%, Very strong- ), and Finland (%, Strong+ ). Danish banks benefit from an improving operating environment and a strong institutional and legal framework. Our assessment also factors in the banking system's large stock of problem loans that date back to the financial crisis, and high household debt. The financial sector has considerable wholesale funding needs, which - although reducing - create some susceptibility to adverse events, while the relatively fragmented structure of the banking industry and strong competition constrain profitability. Improving asset quality, albeit still below peers Our assigned Asset Risk score reflects our assessment that recent positive trends in asset quality are sustainable. Danske Bank has continued to improve its asset quality, as reflected by a decreasing NPL trend. At the end of December- 6 Danske Bank's still elevated problem loan ratio reflects the impact of the financial crisis in Denmark on its domestic portfolio, but also poor asset quality at its operations in the Republic of Ireland (government bond rating A positive) and to some extent in Northern Ireland (UK government bond rating Aa negative). However, at end-6, the remaining part of the non-core portfolio represents only around.6% of the group's assets, most of it performing residential mortgages in Estonia and Ireland. April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

4 Exhibit Danske Bank Problem Loans % Gross Loans Evolution We expect Danske Bank's asset quality to record moderate improvements in the coming months 5.% 4.6% 4.% 4.5%.7% 4.%.5%.96%.%.9%.5%.%.5%.%.5%.% Source: Moody's Banking Financial Metrics Danske Bank non-core assets stood at DKK 9.billion (net) at end-december 6, or % of the bank loan book. The winding-up of Danske Bank's Irish non-core portfolio continues and most of the commercial property portfolio has now been sold. In the first quarter of 6, Danske Bank finalised the disposal of its non-core personal customer business in the Baltics to Swedbank (deposit / senior unsecured rating Aa / Aa stable, BCA a ), reducing non-core assets by 4% since the end of 5. At end- 6, of these non-core assets, 8.5% were non-performing, mitigated by non-performing loan provision coverage of %. We expect further moderate improvements in the group s asset quality during 7, supported by the domestic economy, which we expect to grow by.5% in 7 and.8% in 8, following growth of.% in 6. In addition, the low interest rate environment has improved debt affordability and clients repayment capacity; consumer confidence is up and house prices are growing. That said, asset quality remains weaker than that of its large Nordic peers (average problem loans.% for large Nordic peers, at end-december 6). Group problem loans, as calculated by the bank, declined to.% from.% at end-5 and.7% at end-4. Despite the positive trend in the bank s asset quality, the bank reported DKK. billion collective impairments in 6 related to the oil sector (.9% of total exposure). Other challenging sectors like agriculture (.5% of total exposure), reported a decrease in provisions during the same year. Solid and improving capitalisation Our assigned Capital Score reflects our view Danske Bank s capital position as soundand supports our view that capitalisation is a relative strength for Danske Bank's standalone credit profile. Danske Bank's capital ratios improved in recent years, increasing the bank's ability to absorb potential future losses: at the end of 6, its Common Equity Tier (CET) ratio was 6.%, (6.% at end-5) and above the bank s 4%5% capital target in the short to medium term. At February 7, the DKK 9. billion share buyback programme initiated in February 6 had been completed. Furthermore, the Board of Directors proposed a dividend of DKK 9. per share (45% pay-out ratio) and the bank initiated a DKKbn share buyback programme which will run until February 8 in order to pay-back to shareholders the excess capital versus the bank s internal target. We adjust the bank s capital score to account for its high leverage: tangible common equity was at 4.9% of total assets at the end of December 6, below its large Nordic peers (average of 6%). 4 April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

5 Exhibit 4 Danske Bank's CET Ratio Evolution We view capitalisation as a relative strength for Danske Bank's stand-alone credit profile 8% 6% 4.5% 4.7% 5.% 4 6.% 6.% 5 6 4% % % 8% 6% 4% % % Source: Company reports Profitability is improving, but remains below similarly rated peers Danske Bank's profitability remains a relative weakness for the group, which is reflected in our assigned ba Profitability Score. Net income in 6 was.6% of tangible assets. The firm s strategy currently focuses on enhancing its wealth management capabilities, reducing operating cost and on continuing to improve customer satisfaction in its core markets (Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland). Danske announced plans to merge its activities in Finland (Danske Bank plc) into a single branch during the course of 7 as part of the its efforts to simplify the organisation and increase efficiency, and has already initiated negotiations with authorities. Danske Bank's primary source of revenues is net interest income (around half of total income in 6). In 6, net interest income increased by % year on year, mainly driven by volume growth which offset margin pressure from low rates and competition. Trading income accounted for 8% of income in 6 and added volatility to earnings. In this environment, we see Danske Bank's ability to maintain tight cost control as crucial. The efficiency gap against peers decreased significantly in recent years, as the cost-to-income ratio was 5.4% in 6, slightly above the average of its large Nordic peers (46.%). Danske Bank recorded low impairments in core activities driven by net reversals of DKK. billion (versus impairment charges of DKK57 million at end-5). Furthermore in 6 Danske reported a return on equity (ROE) of.%, above the bank s.5% target. We expect profitability trends to moderately improve going forward as strategic initiatives, including optimisation of price structures and improved cost efficiency and a moderate level of credit provisions mitigate margin pressure resulting from the current low interestrate environment in Denmark. High exposure on market funding, in particular covered bonds; liquidity is adequate and refinancing risk is reducing While the share of deposit funding has increased in recent years to around % of total funding at end-december 6 owing to the deleveraging trend in the Danish economy, Danske Bank relies heavily on capital markets funding. Market funds accounted for 4.7% of tangible banking assets at end-6. Our assigned ba Funding Structure score reflects the historical stability and strength of the Danish covered bond market. The majority of the group's market funds are raised from covered bond markets (largely via Realkredit Danmark, Danske Bank's mortgage subsidiary). The refinancing risk on this funding source is reducing: in the current low interest rate environment, and following the introduction of a new price structure incentivising longer reset periods, Danske Bank's exposure to one- and two-year adjustable rate mortgages has reduced to.5% of gross loans at end- 6 from 7% at end-. In addition, the March 4 bill on mortgage credit loans and mortgage-credit bonds mitigates the refinancing risk arising from short-term market disruption because it provides a framework for failed covered bond auctions from Danish mortgage lenders. We take some comfort from Danske Bank's sizeable reported liquidity buffer - most of which can be used as collateral for central bank liquidity - amounting to DKK58 billion or 5% of total assets at end-december 6. At end-6 our wider definition of 5 April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

6 liquid banking assets, including cash and deposits with the Danish central bank, as well as held-to maturity and liquidity investments designated at fair value through profit or loss (which mainly consist of Danish covered bonds) accounted for around 9% of tangible banking assets and our assigned Liquidity Resources score is a. At end-december 6, Danske Bank's Liquidity Coverage Ratio according to the new EU standards was 58%. Notching Considerations Loss Given Failure Denmark enacted the EU Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD), which we consider to be an Operational Resolution Regime, in March 5. In our loss-given-failure analysis of the bank's balance sheet, we assume residual tangible common equity of % and losses post-failure of 8% of tangible banking assets, a 5% run-off in junior wholesale deposits, a 5% run-off in preferred deposits, and assign a 5% probability to deposits being preferred to senior unsecured debt. These are in line with our standard assumptions. We apply a standard assumption for large European banks that 6% of deposits are junior. Moody's Advanced Loss Given Failure (LGF) analysis indicates that Danske Bank A/S s deposits are likely to face very low loss-givenfailure, due to the loss absorption provided by subordinated debt and, potentially, by senior unsecured debt should deposits be treated preferentially in a resolution, as well as the substantial volume of deposits and senior debt themselves. This results in a Preliminary Rating Assessment (PRA) of for deposits, two notches above the BCA. Danske Bank A/S s senior unsecured debt, issued at the bank level, is likely to face low loss-given-failure due to the loss absorption provided by its own volume and the amount of debt subordinated to it. This results in a PRA of a, one notch above the BCA. Danske Bank's A long-term senior unsecured debt and deposit ratings take into account the bank's BCA, our view of a low loss given- failure on these instruments resulting in one notch of Loss Given Failure (LGF) uplift. We apply our Advanced LGF analysis on the consolidated total banking group including the Finnish operations, and thereby assume an SPE resolution across the group's Nordic operations. We consider that the bank's highly interconnected group structure and cooperation between national regulators make a cross-border resolution probable, implying the equal treatment of creditors of Danske Bank A/S and those of its Finnish subsidiary Danske Bank plc (see also our Credit Opinion on Danske Bank plc). Government Support Although the implementation of the BRRD has prompted us to reconsider the potential for government support to benefit certain creditors, we continue to consider a moderate probability of government support for Danske Bank, resulting in one notch of government support uplift in the bank's A long-term senior unsecured debt and A deposits. This reflects that Danske Bank is Denmark's largest financial institution, and is the market leader in most financial products, commanding an approximate % market share. Counterparty Risk Assessment CR Assessments are opinions of how counterparty obligations are likely to be treated if a bank fails and are distinct from debt and deposit ratings in that they () consider only the risk of default rather than both the likelihood of default and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default; and () apply to counterparty obligations and contractual commitments rather than debt or deposit instruments. The CR assessment is an opinion of the counterparty risk related to a bank's covered bonds, contractual performance obligations (servicing), derivatives (e.g., swaps), letters of credit, guarantees and liquidity facilities. Danske Bank's CR Assessment is positioned at Aa(cr)/Prime(cr). The CR Assessment, prior to government support, is positioned three notches above the Adjusted BCA of, based on the substantial cushion against default provided to the senior obligations represented by the CR Assessment by subordinated instruments. The main difference with our Advanced LGF approach used to determine instrument ratings is that the CR Assessment captures the probability of default on certain senior obligations, rather than expected loss, therefore we focus purely on subordination and take no account of the volume of the instrument class. The CR Assessment also benefits from one notch of systemic support, in line with our support assumptions on deposits and senior unsecured debt. This reflects our view that any support provided by governmental authorities to a bank which benefits senior unsecured debt or deposits is very likely to benefit operating activities and obligations reflected by the CR Assessment as well, 6 April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

7 consistent with our belief that governments are likely to maintain such operations as a going concern in order to reduce contagion and preserve a bank's critical functions. About Moody's Bank Scorecard Our Scorecard is designed to capture, express and explain in summary form our rating committee's judgment. When read in conjunction with our research, a fulsome presentation of our judgment is expressed. As a result, the output of our Scorecard may materially differ from that suggested by raw data alone (though it has been calibrated to avoid the frequent need for strong divergence). The Scorecard output and the individual scores are discussed in rating committees and may be adjusted up or down to reflect conditions specific to each rated entity. 7 April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

8 Rating Methodology and Scorecard Factors Exhibit 5 Danske Bank A/S Macro Factors Weighted Macro Profile Strong + Factor Historic Macro Ratio Adjusted Score Credit Trend Assigned Score Key driver # Key driver # Collateral and provisioning coverage Solvency Asset Risk Problem Loans / Gross Loans.% Expected trend Capital TCE / RWA 9.6% a Nominal leverage Profitability Net Income / Tangible Assets.5% ba ba Expected trend Combined Solvency Score Liquidity Funding Structure Market Funds / Tangible Banking Assets 4.7% Liquid Resources Liquid Banking Assets / Tangible Banking Assets 9.% a b a Combined Liquidity Score Financial Profile Business Diversification Opacity and Complexity Corporate Behavior Total Qualitative Adjustments Sovereign or Affiliate constraint: Scorecard Calculated BCA range Assigned BCA Affiliate Support notching Adjusted BCA ba Balance Sheet in-scope (DKK million),6,6 94, ,46 45,45 44, 7,8,49 4,47 85,5,85, Other liabilities Deposits Preferred deposits Junior Deposits Senior unsecured bank debt Dated subordinated bank debt Junior subordinated bank debt Preference shares (bank) Equity Total Tangible Banking Assets 8 % April 7 ba Market funding quality a Stock of liquid assets Term structure a Aaa - % in-scope 56.9%.% 4.5% 8.6% 5.%.%.%.5%.% % at-failure (DKK million),77,59 847,59 66,57 84,54 44, 7,8,49 4,47 85,5,85, % at-failure 6.% 9.7%.% 6.5% 5.%.%.%.5%.% % Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

9 Debt class De jure waterfall De facto waterfall Notching LGF Assigned Additional Preliminary LGF notching Rating Instrument Sub- Instrument SubDe jure De facto notching guidance notching Assessment volume + ordination volume + ordination versus Subordination Subordination BCA Counterparty Risk Assessment a (cr) Deposits 4.9%.% Senior unsecured bank debt 4.9%.% 4.9% a Junior subordinated bank debt.6%.5%.6%.5% baa (hyb) Non-cumulative bank preference shares.5%.%.5%.% - ba (hyb) Instrument class Counterparty Risk Assessment Deposits Senior unsecured bank debt Junior subordinated bank debt Non-cumulative bank preference shares Loss Given Failure notching Additional Preliminary Rating Notching Assessment - a (cr) a baa (hyb) ba (hyb) Government Support notching Local Currency Rating Aa (cr) A --Ba (hyb) Foreign Currency Rating -A A Baa (hyb) Ba (hyb) Source: Moody's Financial Metrics Ratings Exhibit 6 Category DANSKE BANK A/S Outlook Bank Deposits Baseline Credit Assessment Adjusted Baseline Credit Assessment Counterparty Risk Assessment Issuer Rating Senior Unsecured Jr Subordinate Pref. Stock Non-cumulative Commercial Paper Other Short Term Moody's Rating Positive A/P Aa(cr)/P(cr) A A Baa (hyb) Ba (hyb) P (P)P DANSKE BANK A/S (LONDON BRANCH) Outlook Deposit Note/CD Program Positive (P)A/(P)P DANSKE BANK PLC Outlook Bank Deposits Baseline Credit Assessment Adjusted Baseline Credit Assessment Counterparty Risk Assessment Issuer Rating Senior Unsecured MTN -Dom Curr Subordinate MTN -Dom Curr Pref. Stock Non-cumulative -Dom Curr Positive A/P Aa(cr)/P(cr) A (P)A (P)Ba Ba (hyb) DANSKE CORPORATION Bkd Commercial Paper P Source: Moody's Investors Service 9 April 7 Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results

10 7 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $,5 to approximately $,5,. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN AFSL 6969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN AFSL 8569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 76G of the Corporations Act. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 76G of the Corporations Act. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. and respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY, to approximately JPY5,,. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER April Danske Bank A/S: Semi-Annual Update following year-end 6 Results