Compensating for Missing ERISA Information in Calculating Private Market Per Capita Costs

Similar documents
Business Statistics: A First Course

Stat3011: Solution of Midterm Exam One

Correlation between Inflation Rates and Currency Values

σ e, which will be large when prediction errors are Linear regression model

7. For the table that follows, answer the following questions: x y 1-1/4 2-1/2 3-3/4 4

Statistical Models of Stocks and Bonds. Zachary D Easterling: Department of Economics. The University of Akron

Regression. Lecture Notes VII

CHAPTER 2 Describing Data: Numerical

Rand Final Pop 2. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

State of Maryland. Individual Market Stabilization Reinsurance Analysis. Prepared by: March 15, Wakely Consulting Group

CHAPTER 10 DETERMINING HOW COSTS BEHAVE. Difference in costs Difference in machine-hours $5,400 $4,000. = $0.35 per machine-hour

Econometrics and Economic Data

Health Plans Dashboard

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS OF THE ACA S TAX ON HEALTH INSURANCE IN 2018 AND BEYOND - REVISED

PREMIUM IMPACT OF REMOVING MANUFACTURER REBATES FROM THE MEDICARE PART D PROGRAM

Introduction to Population Modeling

Today's Agenda Hour 1 Correlation vs association, Pearson s R, non-linearity, Spearman rank correlation,

What Practitionors Nood to Know...

Arkansas APCD Universe Counts for Data Request Support

Comparison of IBNR Methods

Subject CS1 Actuarial Statistics 1 Core Principles. Syllabus. for the 2019 exams. 1 June 2018

GGraph. Males Only. Premium. Experience. GGraph. Gender. 1 0: R 2 Linear = : R 2 Linear = Page 1

Session 107 PD, Value of ACA Coding Improvement: Market Effects. Moderator: Douglas T. Norris, FSA, MAAA. Presenters: Ksenia Whittal, FSA, MAAA

All Payer Hospital System Modernization Payment Models Workgroup. Meeting Agenda

Does Privatized Health Insurance Benefit Patients or Producers? Evidence from Medicare Advantage

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Funding Scenarios. Board of Education May 2, 2016

Linear regression model

VIX Fear of What? October 13, Research Note. Summary. Introduction

It Don t Come Easy, Ringo Starr

What is the Expected Return on a Stock?

11/28/2018. Overview. Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Multiple regression. Multiple regression. Multiple regression. Multiple regression

Online Appendix. Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle

Appendix. A.1 Independent Random Effects (Baseline)

Correlation and Regression Applet Activity

The Decreasing Trend in Cash Effective Tax Rates. Alexander Edwards Rotman School of Management University of Toronto

Market Competition Works: Proposed Silver Premiums in the 2014 Individual and Small Group Markets Are Nearly 20% Lower than Expected

National Health Expenditure Accounts

Measuring the Impact of the ACA in Rhode Island

Incorporating a Finite Population Correction into the Variance Estimation of a National Business Survey

SEX DISCRIMINATION PROBLEM

Performance Measurement Work Group Meeting 01/17/2018

ME3620. Theory of Engineering Experimentation. Spring Chapter III. Random Variables and Probability Distributions.

2019 ADVANCE NOTICE: CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS

A Statistical Analysis: Is the Homicide Rate of the United States Affected by the State of the Economy?

This homework assignment uses the material on pages ( A moving average ).

Exhibit ES-1. Synergistic Strategy: Potential Cumulative Savings Compared with Current Baseline Projection,

Stat 101 Exam 1 - Embers Important Formulas and Concepts 1

Texas Medicaid Managed Care Cost Impact Study

Multiple Choice: Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Risk Analysis. å To change Benchmark tickers:

FLORIDA HEALTH CARE EXPENDITURES REPORT

3. Joyce needs to gather data that can be modeled with a linear function. Which situation would give Joyce the data she needs?

Employer Group Waiver Plans Financial Impact Based on the 2017 Advance Notice Summary

Stat 328, Summer 2005

U.S. Debt and Perceptions of Healthcare

NEW YORK LINKING STUDY

Illinois LINKING STUDY

OBJECTIVES 6/30/2016 OVERVIEW SESSION 2: FINANCE BASICS. Financial Literacy for Board Membership

Memorandum. Queensland Competition Authority Incenta Economic Consulting

Cross- Country Effects of Inflation on National Savings

WEB APPENDIX 8A 7.1 ( 8.9)

Lecture 5: Fundamentals of Statistical Analysis and Distributions Derived from Normal Distributions

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS Data Hypothesis

2.05 Predictive Modeling P4P and Physician Engagement. Pay for Performance Summit February 7, 2006

Chapter 14. Descriptive Methods in Regression and Correlation. Copyright 2016, 2012, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14, Slide 1

When determining but for sales in a commercial damages case,

MICHIGAN LINKING STUDY

Quantile Regression as a Tool for Investigating Local and Global Ice Pressures Paul Spencer and Tom Morrison, Ausenco, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA

Establishing a framework for statistical analysis via the Generalized Linear Model

OHIO LINKING STUDY. A Study of the Alignment of the NWEA RIT Scale with the Ohio Achievement Assessment (OAA) December 2012

Utah Partnership for Value: Update on Total Cost of Care Reports in Utah

Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment

Appendix A. Mathematical Appendix

Massachusetts LINKING STUDY

Discussion Reactions to Dividend Changes Conditional on Earnings Quality

Chapter 7 Notes. Random Variables and Probability Distributions

Public Health Data in the Courts: Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual and its Implications

Comparison of OLS and LAD regression techniques for estimating beta

SJAM MPM 1D Unit 5 Day 13

Linear Regression with One Regressor

The data definition file provided by the authors is reproduced below: Obs: 1500 home sales in Stockton, CA from Oct 1, 1996 to Nov 30, 1998

Ch. 8 Risk and Rates of Return. Return, Risk and Capital Market. Investment returns

MAY 2018 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS QUANTITATIVE TOOLS IN BUSINESS (PAPER 1.4) CHIEF EXAMINER S REPORT, QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME

Homework Assignment Section 3

Hedging (Static) Securities Trading: Principles and Procedures (no corresponding chapter)

Non linearity issues in PD modelling. Amrita Juhi Lucas Klinkers

Regression Review and Robust Regression. Slides prepared by Elizabeth Newton (MIT)

Session 5: Associations

Point-Biserial and Biserial Correlations

MEDICARE ADVANTAGE INSIGHTS

CSCI 1951-G Optimization Methods in Finance Part 07: Portfolio Optimization

Market Microstructure Invariants

Comprehensive Project

CONNECTICUT LINKING STUDY

A Brief Illustration of Regression Analysis in Economics John Bucci. Okun s Law

HEALTH PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COST TRENDS

Topic 8: Model Diagnostics

Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Policy Recommendations

Applied Macro Finance

Multiple Regression. Review of Regression with One Predictor

Transcription:

Compensating for Missing ERISA Information in Calculating Private Market Per Capita Costs NAHDO'S HEALTH CARE DATA SUMMIT OCTOBER 10-12, 2018

Overview Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Using the Medical Expenditure Panel (MEPS) Insurance / Employer Component to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Calculation of Privately Insured Self-Insured Medical Per Annual Per Capita Cost Benchmarking Medical Annual Per Capita Costs: MCDB v. National Health Expenditures (NHE) for Private Health Insurance from CMS 2

Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Purpose: Create regression model to predict self-insured ERISA medical claims for 2015 and beyond using Maryland s APCD Estimation necessary because self-insured ERISA claims not available due to the SCOTUS s Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. court case ruling on March 1, 2016 Loss of self-insured ERISA health plan data was about a third (34%) of the APCD s privately insured data Population Selection: Examined the PMPM correlation (R) and coefficient of determination (R 2 ) results by age and county for Maryland residents fully-insured large group vs. self-insured ERISA self-insured large group public employer vs. self-insured ERISA 2013 and 2014 years for the above populations were studied separately under 65 and above 65 years old for the populations were studied separately Selected fully-insured large group under age 65 Maryland residents population to approximate the ERISA data Fully-insured large group wide variety of business types similar to self-insured ERISA PMPM linear relationship results more consistent from 2013 to 2014 Overall Plan: Exclude the over 65 Maryland residents population Under 65 population: Combined years 2013 and 2014 for the fully-insured large group vs. self-insured ERISA results Create a scatter plot of PMPMs: fully-insured large group vs. self-insured ERISA for the combined years (2013 & 2014) Studied the 2-year predicted average vs. 2-year actual average by observing the residuals 3

Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Regression Model Assumptions Residuals are independent and identically distributed normally with zero means Residuals have the same variance (constant standard deviation) for all values of the fully-insured large group PMPMs Residuals are additive (e.g. y i = b 0 + b 1 x i + e i ) Fully-insured large group and self-insured ERISA PMPMs are linearly related Fully-insured large group PMPM is non-stochastic (deterministic or non-random) and is calculated without error 4

Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Visual tests to verify regression model assumptions Scatter plot of self-funded large group ERISA vs. fully-insured large group should be linear (Exhibit 1) Run regression to find out whether the scatter plot relationship is significant (Exhibit 2) Scatter plot of residuals vs. predicted PMPMs should not have any trends (Exhibit 3) The normal probability plot (quantile-quantile plot) of residuals should be linear (Exhibit 4) 5

Self-Insured ERISA Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data $600 MD Residents Under 65 PMPMs by County & Age: Fully-Insured Large Group v. Self-Insured ERISA (2013 & 2014 Combined) Exhibit 1 $500 $400 $300 $200 y = 0.9788x + 17.626 R² = 0.8393 $100 $0 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 Fully-Insured Large Group 6

Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Exhibit 2 The p-value of 0.000 for the slope coefficient is significant (p-value < 0.05) which implies real relationship between the fully-insured large group and self-insured ERISA PMPMs 7

Residuals Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data $150 Residual v. Predicted PMPM Plot Exhibit 3 $100 $50 $0 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 -$50 -$100 Scatter plot shows no visible trend in magnitude or spread of residuals. This verifies independence of residuals and they have an identical distribution which implies the same variance for all PMPM values for selfinsured ERISA variable -$150 Predicted Self-Funded Large Group ERISA PMPM 8

Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Normal Probability Plot for Residuals 5 Exhibit 4 4 Residual quantile (z-score) y = 0.953x + 6E-17 R² = 0.9057 3 2 1 0-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3-1 The normal probability plot is reasonabe to being a straight line (approx. linear), leading us to believe that the normality assumption is approximately normal -2 Normal quantile (Expected z-score) -3 9

Self-Insured ERISA Regression Model for Estimating Privately Insured Medical Claims Data Conclusions: Using the fully-insured data to approximate the self-funded large group ERISA data seems to be reasonable as shown by the validity of the linear regression model Predicted Self-Funded ERISA PMPM = 0.9788 * Fully-Insured Large Group PMPM + 17.626 where, for each dollar of fully-insured large group PMPM, we expect self-funded large ERISA PMPMs to be about 2 cents lower plus $17.63 About 83.9% of the variability in self-funded large group ERISA PMPMs can be explained by fully-insured large group PMPMs 10

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Data Source: MEPS-IC Table II State of Maryland, private-sector data by firm size, 2016 is the underlying data The data is categorized into two components, Less than 50 employees and 50 or more employees The data is for all employer groups (fully-insured and self-insured) including ERISA and Non-ERISA health plans Method: The following steps are applied using Less than 50 employees and 50 or more employees data in the table separately: First, calculate the number of self-insured employees enrolled by selecting the following fields from Table II: Number of employees Percent of employees in establishments that offer health insurance Percent of employees that are enrolled in health insurance at establishments that offer health insurance Percent of enrollees that are enrolled in self-insured plans at establishments that offer health insurance The number of self-insured employees enrolled = the product of the above four fields (See Exhibit 5) 11

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Exhibit 5 Less than 50 Employees 50 or more Employees Calculation the Number of Self-Insured Employees Enrolled Number of employees 648,214 1,703,508 2,351,722 Percent of employees in establishments that offer health insurance 49.0% 97.4% Percent of employees that are enrolled in health insurance at establishments that offer health insurance 48.7% 54.6% Percent of enrollees that are enrolled in self-insured plans at establishments that offer health insurance 8.5% 65.0% Number of Self-Insured Employees Enrolled 13,148 588,856 602,004 Source: Table II. State of Maryland, private-sector data by firm size, 2016 Total 12

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Second, estimate the number of self-insured members per employee for Less than 50 employees and 50 or more employees separately using StatePurchasedSelfFunded provided by AHRQ Find the percentage of employees by contract type for the following: Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have single coverage (Total Active Single Enrollees) Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have employee-plus-one coverage (Total Active Employee-Plus-One Enrollees) Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have family coverage (Total Active Family Enrollees) Find the average number of members by contract type by calculating the slope of the average premium for the following contract types: Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have single coverage = Average Single Premium Average Single Premium = 1.0 Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have employee-plus-one coverage = Average Employee-Plus-One Premium Average Single Premium. This value is usually approximately two times the average single premium. Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have family coverage = Average Family Premium Average Single Premium. This value is usually approximately three times the average single premium. 13

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Find the composite average number of members for the three contract types above by: calculating the sum product of the percentage of employees by contract type and the slope of the average premiums. This result is the number of self-insured members per employee. See Exhibit 6 below. Exhibit 6: Estimate the Number of Self-Insured Members Per Employee Avg # of Membs LT 50 Avg # of Membs GE 50 Percent of EEs By Contract Type By Contract Type (1) By Contract Type (1) LT 50 EEs GE 50 EEs Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have single coverage 1.00 1.00 57.9% 51.4% Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have employee-plus-one covera 1.78 2.03 24.6% 18.6% Employees enrolled in a health insurance plan that have family coverage 1.50 3.07 17.5% 30.0% Number of Self-Insured Members Per Employee 1.28 1.81 (1) 3-Tier members per type of contract assumption developed from the State_Purchased_Self-Insured_2016 information from Davis, Karen (AHRQ) <Karen.Davis@ahrq.hhs.gov> 14

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Third, estimate the number of self-insured members enrolled by: calculating the product of the number of self-insured members per employee and the number of self-insured employees enrolled. See Exhibit 7 below. Exhibit 7 Less than 50 Employees 50 or more Employees Total Calculation the Number of Self-Insured Employees Enrolled: Number of Self-Insured Employees Enrolled 13,148 588,856 602,004 Estimate the Number of Self-Insured Members Per Employee: Number of Self-Insured Members Per Employee 1.28 1.81 Less than 50 Members 50 or more Members Number of Self-Insured Members Enrolled 16,816 1,067,007 1,083,823 Total 15

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Fourth, estimate the number of self-insured members enrolled under age 65 Estimate the percent of self-insured members enrolled under 65 using the SHADAC analysis (http://statehealthcompare.shadac.org/) of the American Community Survey (ACS) for health insurance coverage type by State (Maryland) and age. We use the employer coverage type. Apply this percentage to the number of self-insured members enrolled to find the number of self-insured members enrolled under age 65. (See Exhibit 8 below). Exhibit 8 Less than 50 Members 50 or more Members Number of Self-Insured Members Enrolled 16,816 1,067,007 1,083,823 Number of Self-Insured Members Enrolled under Age 65 Percent of self-insured members enrolled under age 65 (1) 98.9% 98.9% Number of Self-Insured Members Enrolled under Age 65 16,630 1,055,217 1,071,847 (1) Source: Shadac Report Total 16

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Fifth, estimate the number of self-insured ERISA members enrolled under age 65 We use the APCD (eligibility files) and SAS to retrieve five years (2010 2014) of self-insured (SI) member months by: year market segment (Large Group and Public Employee Other) for Maryland residents who are under age 65. Please note that the self-insured Large Group is SI-ERISA and the Public Employee Other is SI-Non-ERISA. We then calculate SI-ERISA member months as a percent of total self-insured member months (SI-ERISA plus SI-Non- ERISA) by: summing all five years of member months for SI-ERISA and dividing this amount by the total of all self-insured member months for all five years. This calculation yields SI-ERISA as 56% of total SI member months. This percentage (56%) for self-insured ERISA is assumed for 2015 and beyond (i.e., data without self-insured ERISA). Apply this percentage assumption for self-insured ERISA to the number of self-insured members enrolled under age 65 to get the number of self-insured ERISA members under age 65. 17

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Finally, estimate the number of exposed months (eligible months) for members enrolled in self-insured ERISA plans who are under age 65 Estimate the average number of months exposed per member per year over five years (2010-2014) for self-insured ERISA plans from the MCDB. This result is approximately 10.1 months per member per year Apply this assumption by multiplying 10.1 months per member per year and the number of self-insured ERISA members who are under age 65. This result yields self-insured ERISA months exposed for members who are under 65. 18

Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Insurance / Employer Component (MEPS-IC) to estimate Privately Insured Self-Insured ERISA Medical Enrollment Limitations The MEPS-IC data is survey data which is subject to standard errors in gathering the data Approximately 56% of total self-insured members are assumed to be enrolled in ERISA plans for the years 2015 and beyond. There is wearing off of this assumption with new survey data. Approximately 10.1 months exposed per member per year for members enrolled in self-insured ERISA plans is assumed for the years 2015 and beyond. There is wearing off of this assumption with new survey data. Self-Insured ERISA enrollment estimation is only for the under age 65 Maryland residents population Self-Insured ERISA estimations developed are not at the member level as the MEPS-IC data is in aggregate 19

Calculation of Privately Self-Insured ERISA Medical Annual Per Capita Cost Self-Insured Medical Annual Per Capita Cost Calculation Estimate self-insured ERISA members was developed for use in the estimate of medical expenditures for self-insured ERISA as part of the Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) Total Cost of Care per Capita Cost calculation for privately insured Maryland residents The member months developed are multiplied by self-insured ERISA PMPMs estimated using a regression model and fully-insured large group PMPMs The resulting expenditures are then annualized to estimate the per capital costs ERISA Annual Medical Per Capita Cost (estimated self-insured medical PMPM cost) x (12 months) 20

Benchmarking Medical Annual Per Capita Costs: MCDB v. National Health Expenditures (NHE) for Private Health Insurance from CMS Benchmarking Annual Per Capita Costs: MCDB v. National Health Expenditures (NHE) for Private Health Insurance from CMS Privately Insured Medical (2013 to 2016) MCDB NHE (CMS) % Diff (MCDB over NHE) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2013 2014 2015 2016 2013 2014 2015 2016 Medical $3,132 $3,240 $3,444 $3,504 $3,489 $3,638 $3,920 $4,163-10.2% -10.9% -12.1% -15.8% Notes: (1) MCDB population is Maryland residents who are under age 65. There is no age restriction on the NHE (all 50 states) results. (2) MCDB means Medical Care Data Base which is part of Maryland's All-Payer Claims Database. The MCDB includes claims and membership data submitted by health insurance carriers, and Third Party Administrators. (3) CMS Source: https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nhe-fact-sheet.html (4) CMS national annual per capita cost excludes net cost of private health insurance and dental services for this comparison. 21

Thank You! 22