Using the IRRS to strengthen regulatory competence in Ireland

Similar documents
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 31 and 32 thereof,

Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 June /14 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0340 (NLE) ATO 45

Convention on Nuclear Safety 7 th Review Meeting 2017

COMMISSION DECISION. of

Statement on behalf of the Euratom Community

Meeting of the Group of Experts established under Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty. Luxembourg, November 2015 SUMMARY REPORT

The Euratom Basic Safety Standards Directive

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation. {SEC(2011) 1472 final} {SEC(2011) 1473 final}

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Survey on the Use of Dose Constraints and Reference Levels Made in the Context of the European ALARA Network

Implementing the BSSD in the UK. Ian Chell Policy Manager Department of Health

Elements of National Law and Decommissioning

Mission Statement. To the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government

Jan Jilek. Electricity Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee Brussels, 13 September European Commission Directorate-General for Energy

The European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom):

HORIZON 2020 Research & Innovation

EURATOM requirements and international guidance

Division for Europe STRATEGY FOR THE TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME IN THE EUROPE REGION

NIPPON EXPORT AND INVESTMENT INSURANCE GUIDELINES FOR INFORMATION DISCLOSURE CONSIDERATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SECTOR PROJECTS IN TRADE INSURANCE

COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-8

Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation. {SEC(2011) 1472 final} {SEC(2011) 1473 final}

2.1.The radiation safety legislation is comprised of the Constitution of Mongolia; this law,

Statement on behalf of the Euratom Community

2010 IPA Horizontal Programme on Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection PF1 Albania - Final Project Fiche No. 1

Official Journal of the European Union L 330/31 COMMISSION

EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY REPORT. On the implementation of the obligations under the Convention on Nuclear Safety

Public stakeholder consultation on the Euratom Research and Training Programme

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Petras Auštrevičius (PE v03-00)

Use of the Graded Approach in Regulation

ENVIRONMENT AGENCIES GUIDANCE ON SUITABILITY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE ADVISERS

Euratom research and training programme under Horizon-2020

Statement on behalf of DG Energy

Final PF2 Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes Part II of the Horizontal Programme on Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection

Final Report. Comparison among different decommissioning funds methodologies for nuclear installations. EU Stakeholder Report

Mission Statement. Dose Limits and Reference Levels

Horizon 2020 : The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Fission EU research : activities under Horizon 2020 ( )

LEAVING THE EU THE EURATOM TREATY PART 2: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Experience from the INEX 5 exercise on interfaces between Accident Management and Emergency Preparedness and Response

How potential exposures may be incorporated in IAEA Safety Standards

National Report to the Joint Convention - Sixth review meeting

The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia takes part in some of the work of the OECD (agreement of 28th October 1961).

This final-form rulemaking will be effective upon publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT

Luxembourg. National Report on the Measures Taken by Luxembourg to Fulfil the Obligations Laid Down in the:

European Joint Research Programme in the management and disposal of radioactive waste

MCGILL GUIDE TO UNIT-LEVEL CLIMATE AND SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLANNING

FATF Mutual Evaluation of Ireland 2017

Construction of a new nuclear capacity at the site of Kozloduy NPP. Licensing and Environmental Impact Assessment

Introduction to Nuclear Law

GUIDELINE NO.4 PENSION PLAN GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES SELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE AND

Action Document for Turkey Nuclear Safety Cooperation. Total estimated cost: EUR 3 million Total amount of EU budget contribution EUR 3 million 6.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)

Stakeholders Involvement in Euratom Research and Training Programmes Jorma Aurela, Finland

SOME CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS AND ISSUES IN NUCLEAR LAW

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 25 November 2013 (OR. en) 13675/13 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0254 (NLE) ATO 101 SOC 690 SAN 339

Accidental and Unintended Medical Exposures in Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom

Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Nuclear Fission, Safety and Radiation Protection. Deadline: 13 November 2012, at , Brussels local time 1

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS

CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY. Luxembourg

ANNEX ICELAND NATIONAL PROGRAMME IDENTIFICATION. Iceland CRIS decision number 2012/ Year 2012 EU contribution.

Trans-border patient rights latest EU developments. EUMASS Seminar on 8 February 2013 in Brussels

Justification, Optimization and Dose Limits: The recent evolutions of National Regulations in European Countries

EU Council Adopts Revised Nuclear Safety Directive

NEA INEX 5 EXERCISE. on Notification, Communication and Interfaces Related to Catastrophic Events Involving Radiation or Radiological Materials

Nuclear Law. Preparing for Deployment of a UK Small Modular Reactor by 2030

The financing system for nuclear waste management

UKAEA s strategy for the decommissioning of its nuclear licensed sites. A review by HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate

IAEA-NS- ORIGINAL: English

Nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre Euratom Research & Training Programme

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION

Water Sector Reforms

Information Circular. INFCIRC/830 Date: 30 November 2011

GOOD PRACTICES FOR GOVERNANCE OF PENSION SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES

Measuring the Impact of the ACA in Rhode Island

IOPS Technical Committee DRAFT GOOD PRACTICES FOR GOVERNANCE OF PENSION SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES. Version for public consultation

Guide. Commission Recommendation

Managing tax administration reforms

Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2010 How to comply with your EPR RSR environmental permit sealed sources

SECOND REVIEW MEETING JOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND ON

IAEA Safety Standards for protecting people and the environment. Regulatory Control of Radiation Sources

Hazardous Waste Corrective Action and Permitting Task Force. White Paper: Development and Use of Pricing Factors in Hazardous Waste Program Operations

Euratom Drinking Water Directive

BREXIT BRIEFING. Euratom and Brexit. British Medical Association bma.org.uk

Exercise Unified Response and Lessons Learned

TRUST COMPANY BUSINESS

Multi-country European Integration Facility

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. Millstone Power Station, Unit No.

Regulation of Commonwealth Radiation and Nuclear Activities

Q Company Secretaries. Update. Quarterly newsletter

Euratom Joint Programme in Radioactive Waste Management - from Reflections (2015) to Requirements (2016)

Implementation of Financial Guarantees for Licensees

Luxembourg. National Report on the measures taken by Luxembourg to fulfill the obligations laid down in the:

E&T in Radioactive Waste Disposal

Environmental Liability Directive 2004/35/EC- UK report to the European Commission on the experience gained in the application of the Directive

European Joint Programme in Radioactive Waste Management

Transcription:

Using the IRRS to strengthen regulatory competence in Ireland Kilian Smith EPA Office of Radiological Protection Effective Nuclear Regulatory Systems: Sustaining Improvements Globally 14 th April 2016

IRRS in a Nutshell Integrated Regulatory Review Service Run by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) A review of Ireland s radiation protection regulatory framework against the IAEA standards

IRRS Why now? Tradition of Regulatory Peer Reviews International peer review requirements under Euratom Nuclear Safety and Radioactive Waste Directives Revision of Ireland s National Emergency Plan for Nuclear Accidents (NEPNA) Pending implementation of the new Euratom Basic Safety Standards (BSS) Directive; Merger of the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Issues in relation to the regulation of patient protection;

Preparatory Stage The IRRS has a modular form designed to be tailored to address both generic and country-specific needs The IAEA worked closely with Ireland to ensure the scope of the review mission was sufficient to address all areas of interest.

Policy Issues 1. Radioactive waste management policy and the role of the Regulatory Body, 2. Integration of radiation protection regulation with environmental protection regulation the key considerations Transport Control of medical exposures Occupational radiation protection Control of radioactive discharges and materials for clearance Environmental monitoring Control of chronic exposures (radon)

Preparatory Stage The EPA took the lead role for the preparations and project planning for the mission EPA s peer review mission experience proved invaluable to Ireland s preparations The project phases raising awareness, training, stakeholder engagement, self-assessment, pre-meetings with the IAEA mission

IRRS Our guiding principles This is a review of Ireland s framework for radiation safety EPA has a leadership role There are many other actors Transparency We have nothing to hide We have confidence in our work We are open to learning and improving Whole of Ireland approach We are all involved We can t do this on our own

SARIS Self Assessment Evaluation against the international standards - computer-based questionnaire supported by the IAEA (SARIS) Main outputs SARIS question sets, supported by reference documents Main summary Findings/action plan Self-assessment identified gaps & issues to be addressed

Self Assessment The preparatory phase helped to strengthen the links between the various bodies involved in radiation protection in Ireland. The on-going and regular briefings focussed the various bodies on the IRRS mission and ensured involvement and engagement by all the key players. The engagement and involvement of people/agencies with a role in the regulation of radiation safety was crucial to the mission s success.

IRRS Review Team IRRS mission review in Ireland took place from 30 th August to 9 th September 2015. Review Team 10 Senior Experts from 9 countries 4 IAEA Staff Members

The Mission 29 main Irish counterparts & others 10 days of intensive discussion, review, observation, evidence gathering and sharing experience Visits to St James Hospital, Beacon Hospital, Becton Dickenson, M2i and NECC Meetings with senior officials from DECLG, DoH and HSE

Outcome of the mission Recommendations to Government and the regulatory bodies covering: The framework for patient protection, inc coordination Coordination on transport of radioactive materials The legislative framework for remediation Financial support for the National Policy for Radioactive Waste Management Documentation of regulatory and other procedures Implementation of all of the requirements in the Basic Safety Standards

Outcome of the mission Good practices by the Government and the regulatory bodies covering EPA s radiation safety inspection activities EPA s web-based system for radiological licenses A framework for major emergency management that incorporates nuclear and radiological emergency plans The National Radon Control Strategy Good practices identified are useful for prioritising and protecting important strengths in a time of a changing environment and constrained public resources

Outcome of the mission The IRRS mission did not highlight any major issues that were not already identified during the comprehensive selfassessment and analysis phases. Independent voice of the review team added significant weight to issues previously highlighted to government by the national regulatory body The mission helped to further strengthen links between all the national bodies (government, licensees, regulatory) with a role in the regulation of radiation safety. The mission identified gaps in the national regulatory framework and came at an opportune time as it commences the process to transpose the Euratom BSS

Outcome of the mission Revision of the regulatory framework to address gaps in the regulation of patient protection will be addressed in the transposition of the new BSS The real beneficiaries of the IRRS mission will be the people of Ireland (public, patients, workers). By ensuring that Ireland maintains and further improves its high standards of radiation protection these people will continue to be protected from the harmful effects of ionising radiation while availing of its many beneficial uses

That s the IRRS Mission finished now what s next?

The journey continues.. Agree Action Plan Implement Action Plan Transpose BSS Follow up mission T0 T0+29 months Sept 2015 Feb 2018 T0+40 months Mid 2019

Thank you!

Advance Reference Material (ARM) Self-assessment identified gaps and issues that need to be addressed SARIS question sets (40) Referenced Documents (235) Legislation (54) Summary reports (2) Main summary Findings/action plan 71 challenges identified