System Flexibility Indicators. Operational Forum, 26 May 2010

Similar documents
System Management Principles Statement. Compliance report Summary of balancing actions and breaches Performance compared to last year

FDD FIRM STORAGE SERVICE NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY

Operational Forum Meeting

Operational Forum Meeting

EU Harmonisation of Maintenance Publications at Interconnections Points

ISG206-SPAR REPORTING ON MAY 2018 SYSTEM PRICE ANALYSIS REPORT 1 SYSTEM PRICES AND LENGTH

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Issue 15 Applicable from 01 January 2019

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Issue 14 Applicable from 22 November 2018

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Issue 10 Applicable from 01 June 2018

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Issue 12 Applicable from 01 October 2018

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Issue 11 Applicable from 01 September 2018

Report for Modification Panel January 2006 Transmission Workstream

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

ISG202-SPAR REPORTING ON JANUARY 2018 SYSTEM PRICE ANALYSIS REPORT 1 SYSTEM PRICES AND LENGTH

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Applicable from 1 October 2017

European Workgroup. European Workgroup 3 rd April 2014

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Applicable from 1 August 2017

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Methodology Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Applicable from 1 February 2016

$220,000 anualised revenue per 1GWh

Interconnector (UK) Limited. Charging Methodology Statement related to the IUK Access Agreement and IUK Access Code Applicable from 1 February 2017

MOFFAT DESIGNATED ARRANGEMENTS NTS EXIT POINT AT MOFFAT

UNC Text Allocation Register

LDZ Exit Capacity NTS (ECN) Charges March 2017 Craig Neilson UK GAS DISTRIBUTION

Government Bond Market Development in Myanmar

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Power Accountants Association Annual Meeting Potential Impacts from Oct 2015 Rate Change

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report November 2018

Informed Storage: Understanding the Risks and Opportunities

U.S. Natural Gas Storage Charts

Regional overview Gisborne

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report December 2017

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report December 2016

PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report September 2017

Large Commercial Rate Simplification

Development of Economy and Financial Markets of Kazakhstan

Regional overview Hawke's Bay

The Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement

Looking at a Variety of Municipal Valuation Metrics

Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement

Exit Capacity Substitution Workshop 4 - Minutes Tuesday 25 th May 2010 Ofgem Offices, Millbank, London

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

Factor Leave Accruals. Accruing Vacation and Sick Leave

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

The Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement

EU Codes Legal Roadmap

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

Pricing Considerations Cattle Pricing and Risk Management

Performance Report October 2018

Security Analysis: Performance

Exam 1 Problem Solving Questions Review

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

HYDROELECTRIC INCENTIVE MECHANISM

Firm Frequency Response (FFR) Market Information Report

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

Report on the system balancing actions and related procurement activities in the GASPOOL market area in the gas year 2015/2016

Gas storage: overview and static valuation

P305 POST IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW

Regional overview Auckland

SmallBizU WORKSHEET 1: REQUIRED START-UP FUNDS. Online elearning Classroom. Item Required Amount ($) Fixed Assets. 1 -Buildings $ 2 -Land $

DECEMBER KPI REPORT. Service Provider SLA Performance Core and Non-Core Settlement Systems Core and Non-Core BSC Systems. Supplier Performance

Hedging Potential for MGEX Soft Red Winter Wheat Index (SRWI) Futures

PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY. Categorised Profit & Loss (Inclusive of GST) - Full Taxation

MOD 329 Analysis of & Potential Changes to the UNC Rules Governing the Submission of SHQs - Including Transportation Price Incentivising Solution.

CPA Australia Plan Your Own Enterprise Competition

Big Walnut Local School District

London Borough of Barnet Pension Fund. Communication Strategy (2018)

European Update. 1 st October 2015

CODE MODIFICATION PROPOSAL No 0262 Treatment of Capacity affected by Force Majeure Version 4.0 Date: 18/08/2009. Non Urgent

Capturing equity gains whilst protecting portfolios

Four Types of Price Variation: Applications for Marketing and Risk Management

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

SURVEY OF BUSINESSES INFLATION EXPECTATIONS JULY 2018 RESEARCH SERVICES DEPARTMENT RESEARCH AND ECONOMIC PROGRAMMING DIVISION

Isle Of Wight half year business confidence report

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Montana MarketManager A PRIMER ON UNDERSTANDING FUTURES AND OPTIONS MARKETS. Workshop 5 - Part 1 Winter 2000 Marketing Workshops January 6 & 7, 2000

California ISO Report. Regional Marginal Losses Surplus Allocation Impact Study

Firm Frequency Response Market Information for Apr-16

PUBLIC TRADING OPERATIONS REPORT MARCH 2018

DE MINIMIS ACCEPTANCE THRESHOLD (DMAT) AND CONTINUOUS ACCEPTANCE DURATION LIMIT (CADL) REVIEW 2018

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. January 2019

Natural Gas Avoided Cost Meeting. 10 a.m. 12 p.m. May 12, 2017

Operating Reserves Educational Session Part B

Manager Comparison Report June 28, Report Created on: July 25, 2013

Using a Market Value Concept to Facilitate Negotiation of Alternative Price Formulas. 6 December 2006 Kaoru Kawamoto Osaka Gas Co.

Algo Trading System RTM

Reactive Power Market Tender Development Initial Proposals

Memorandum. This memorandum does not require Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cost Estimation of a Manufacturing Company

Voya Indexed Universal Life-Protector

Review of Membership Developments

0349 Introduction of a Force Majeure. Capacity Management Arrangement. Stage 01: Proposal

1.2 The purpose of the Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to:

PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 2009

Euro Area Securities Issues Statistics: February 2017

Constructing a Cash Flow Forecast

PHOENIX ENERGY MARKETING CONSULTANTS INC. HISTORICAL NATURAL GAS & CRUDE OIL PRICES UPDATED TO July, 2018

Transcription:

System Flexibility Indicators Operational Forum, 26 May 21

Introduction There is potential for greater volatility in gas flows in future years driven, in particular, by: Growth in renewable sources of electricity generation CCGTs may become the marginal source of generation New sources of gas supply (more LNG, more fast cycling storage etc.) Greater supply, demand and linepack variation may result, both within day and across days A more flexible NTS may therefore be required by our customers

Introduction We want to monitor indicators of such trends to predict any requirement for change 2 industry workshops held in 29 to develop leading and lagging indicators Final Proposals on indicators presented to the February 21 Transmission Workstream Phase 1 we can do now Phase 2 we need to do further work on Agreed to report on indicators to Operational Forum every 6 months Phase 1 today, phase 2 to be included next time

Phase 1 Leading Indicators Supply 1) Day on day difference in proportion of supply from the North & South 2) Day on day difference in supply by group LNG UKCS Norway ICs Storage Linepack 1) Maximum daily range of within day linepack changes 2) Frequency of linepack changes at particular thresholds 3) Within day PCLP changes Demand 1) Within day demand variation by sector 2) Flow flexibility usage by sector ICs Storage Power stations DN offtakes

Phase 1 Lagging Indicators Supply 1) Use of Operating Margins gas 2) Use of entry buybacks 3) Use of entry scalebacks Supply & Demand 1) Residual balancing frequency 2) Residual balancing volumes 3) Residual balancing costs

Leading Supply Indicators

Leading Supply Indicator 1: Day to Day North / South Supply Volatility M aximum day-to-day diffe re nce in pe rce ntage of supply from Northern ASEPs, by month 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 Apr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 Apr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1 This graph shows the maximum day on day change per month in the percentage of total supply from Northern ASEPs. Eg. if on one day 255 mcmd came from North and 117 mcmd from South (68% from North) then on the next day 257 mcmd came from North and 12 mcmd from South (71% from North), the day to day percentage change would be 3%. If this was the highest in that month, 3% would be plotted on the graph.

Leading Supply Indicator 1: Day to Day North / South Supply Volatility Day-to-day difference in supply from North and South on the days of maximum change 6 4 2 mcm -2 North South -4-6 Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 Apr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 Apr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1 This graph shows the associated volume changes from the previous graph. The green ring shows Northern supply responding to an increased demand whereas the red ring shows little change in demand but a change in location of supplies. Using the example numbers quoted on the previous slide, +2 mcmd would be plotted against 'North' and -15 mcmd against 'South'.

Leading Supply Indicator 2: Percentage of supply accounted for by group Maximum day-to-day absolute difference in percentage of supply from LNG, by month 2% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 Apr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 Apr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1 This (and the following 4 graphs) shows the maximum day on day change per month in the percentage of total supply from different supply groups. Eg. if the supply from LNG was 5 mcmd on a day and 35 mcmd on the next day against total NTS supplies of 38 mcmd (13%) and 37 mcmd (9%) respectively, the day to day percentage change would be 4%. If this was the highest in that month, 4% would be plotted on the graph.

Leading Supply Indicator 2: Percentage of supply accounted for by group Maximum day-to-day absolute difference in percentage of supply from UKCS, by month 2% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 Apr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 Apr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1

Leading Supply Indicator 2: Percentage of supply accounted for by group Maximum day-to-day absolute difference in percentage of supply from Norway, by month 2% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 Apr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 Apr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1

Leading Supply Indicator 2: Percentage of supply accounted for by group M axim u m day-to-d ay absolute d ifference in percen tag e of supply from IUK&BBL, by month 2% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 Apr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 Apr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1

Leading Supply Indicator 2: Percentage of supply accounted for by group Maximum day-to-day absolute difference in percentage of supply from Storage, by month 2% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Oct-3 Jan-4 Apr-4 Jul-4 Oct-4 Jan-5 A pr-5 Jul-5 Oct-5 Jan-6 Apr-6 Jul-6 Oct-6 Jan-7 Apr-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Jan-8 Apr-8 Jul-8 Oct-8 Jan-9 A pr-9 Jul-9 Oct-9 Jan-1 Apr-1

Leading Linepack Indicators

Leading Linepack Indicator 1: Maximum daily range of within day linepack changes Daily Range of Hourly Linepack: Monthly Maximum 3 25 2 mcm 15 1 5 Apr-1 Oct-1 Apr-2 Oct-2 Apr-3 Oct-3 Apr-4 Oct-4 Apr-5 Oct-5 Apr-6 Oct-6 Apr-7 Oct-7 Apr-8 Oct-8 Apr-9 Oct-9 Apr-1 This graph plots the maximum range on any day in each month between the highest and lowest hourly NTS linepack. Eg. if the highest hourly linepack recorded was 33 mcm and the lowest was 315 mcm on the same day and that constituted the largest daily range in that particular month, 15 mcm would be plotted on the graph for that month.

Leading Linepack Indicator 1: Maximum daily range of within day linepack changes 3 Within-day Max-Min Range of NTS Linepack Winter 8/9 Winter 9/1 25 2 15 1 5 1/1/8 1/11/8 1/12/8 1/1/9 1/2/9 1/3/9 1/4/9 1/5/9 1/6/9 1/7/9 1/8/9 1/9/9 1/1/9 1/11/9 1/12/9 1/1/1 1/2/1 1/3/1 MCM Date Rolling Monthly Average

Leading Linepack Indicator 1: Maximum daily range of within day linepack changes 3 25 2 Within-day Max-Min Range of NTS Linepack GBA Dates > 4/1/21 > 7/1/21 > 9/1/21 > 11/1/21 15 1 5 1/1/9 8/1/9 15/1/9 22/1/9 29/1/9 5/11/9 12/11/9 19/11/9 26/11/9 3/12/9 1/12/9 17/12/9 24/12/9 31/12/9 7/1/1 14/1/1 21/1/1 28/1/1 4/2/1 11/2/1 18/2/1 25/2/1 4/3/1 11/3/1 18/3/1 25/3/1 Date MCM

Leading Linepack Indicator 2: Frequency of within day changes Hourly linepack - daily range - by year 2 18 16 number of days 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Apr-5 to Mar-6 Apr-6 to Mar-7 Apr-7 to Mar-8 Apr-8 to Mar-9 Apr-9 to Mar-1 to 5 5 to 1 1 to 15 15 to 2 2 to 25 25 to 3 m ore daily range of hourly linepack, m cm This graph shows, for the last 5 years, the distribution of the maximum daily range of hourly linepack. Eg. for Apr-5 to Mar-6, the maximum daily range was less than 5 mcm on just below 1 days, was between 5 and 1 mcm on approximately 16 days etc.

Leading Linepack Indicator 2: Within-day PCLP swings Predicted Closing Linepack (PCLP) Daily Range of Hourly PCLP: Monthly Maximum and Average 8 7 6 5 mcm 4 3 2 1 Apr-6 Jun-6 Aug-6 Oct-6 Dec-6 Feb-7 Apr-7 Jun-7 Aug-7 Oct-7 Dec-7 Feb-8 Apr-8 Jun-8 Aug-8 Oct-8 Dec-8 Feb-9 Apr-9 Jun-9 Aug-9 Oct-9 Dec-9 Feb-1 Apr-1 monthly maximum monthly average PCLP = Opening linepack + System Inputs (Daily Flow Nominations and Storage Flow Nominations) System Demand (Offtake Profile Notifications) This graph shows ranges of hourly PCLP values during the gas day.

Leading Demand Indicators

Leading Demand Indicator 1: Within day demand variation by sector Hourly Interconnector Demand: D aily Maximum Minus Minimum 4 3.5 3 mcm / hour 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 5/4/9 5/5/9 5/6/9 5/7/9 5/8/9 5/9/9 5/1/9 5/11/9 5/12/9 5/1/1 5/2/1 5/3/1 5/4/1 This graph (and the next 3) shows the difference between the maximum hourly volume offtaken and the minimum hourly volume offtaken for each demand sector. This graph displays the results for the Bacton and Moffat interconnectors.

Leading Demand Indicator 1: Within day demand variation by sector Hourly Storage Demand: Daily Maximum Minus Minimum 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 5/4/9 5/5/9 5/6/9 5/7/9 5/8/9 5/9/9 5/1/9 5/11/9 5/12/9 mcm / hour 5/1/1 5/2/1 5/3/1 5/4/1

Leading Demand Indicator 1: Within day demand variation by sector Hourly Power Station Demand: Daily Maximum Minus Minimum 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 5/4/9 5/5/9 5/6/9 5/7/9 5/8/9 5/9/9 5/1/9 5/11/9 5/12/9 mcm / hour 5/1/1 5/2/1 5/3/1 5/4/1

Leading Demand Indicator 1: Within day demand variation by sector Hourly LDZ Demand: Daily Maximum Minus Minimum 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 5/4/9 5/5/9 5/6/9 5/7/9 5/8/9 5/9/9 5/1/9 5/11/9 5/12/9 mcm / hour 5/1/1 5/2/1 5/3/1 5/4/1

23/4/21 16/4/21 9/4/21 2/4/21 26/3/21 19/3/21 Leading Demand Indicator 2: Flow flexibility usage by sector NTS Exit Flow Flexibility by Sector 1 8 6 4 2 mcm -2-4 -6-8 12/3/21 5/3/21 26/2/21 19/2/21 12/2/21 5/2/21 29/1/21 22/1/21 15/1/21 8/1/21 1/1/21 Date IND INT OT PS STOR

Lagging Indicators

Lagging Supply Indicator 1: Use of Operating Margins Gas Operating Margins Utilisation 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 1/4/22 1/4/23 1/4/24 1/4/25 1/4/26 1/4/27 Utilisation Volume (GWh) 1/4/28 1/4/29 Year starting 3 Number of days Utilisation volume (GWh) Number of days 2 1

Lagging Supply Indicator 2: Entry Capacity Buybacks Entry Capacity Buyback History 3 25 2 15 1 5 Apr-2 Aug-2 Dec-2 Apr-3 Aug-3 Dec-3 Apr-4 Aug-4 Dec-4 Apr-5 Aug-5 Dec-5 Apr-6 Aug-6 Dec-6 Apr-7 Aug-7 Buyback Quantity (GWh) Dec-7 Apr-8 Aug-8 Dec-8 Apr-9 Aug-9 Dec-9 Apr-1 month

Lagging Supply Indicator 3: Interruptible Entry Capacity Scaleback Volume of Entry Capacity Scaleback Actions 25 2 15 mcm 1 5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 to 3 April Calendar Year

Lagging Supply & Demand Indicator 1: Number of days of residual balancing actions Residual Balancing Actions - Number of days days 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 to 3 Apr Calendar Year Buy Sell Buy and Sell

Lagging Supply and Demand Indicator 2: Residual Balancing Annual Volumes Residual Balancing Actions - Annual Volumes mcm 4 3 2 1-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 to 3 Apr Calendar Year Buy Sell

Lagging Supply and Demand Indicator 3: Residual Balancing Annual Costs Residual Balancing Actions - Annual Costs m 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 to 3 Apr Calendar Year Buy Sell

Summary Clear trends of increasing volatility are hard to detect at this stage The majority of indicators at this stage show either: flat profiles; seasonal profiles; or some volatility but with no underlying trend For some indicators, we don t yet have enough data to make a judgement We will continue to add to the datasets and report to the industry Additional indicators are in development