Allocation of General Fund. Program Allocation. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Director: Amber D'Amato

Similar documents
KITSAP COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Mission: Enable the development of quality, affordable, structurally safe, and environmentally sound communities.

Mission: Enable the development of quality, affordable, structurally safe, and environmentally sound communities.

Allocation of General Fund. Program Allocation. AUDITOR Elected Official: Dolores Gilmore

No data was reported to P.E.A.K.

Program Allocation. Allocation of General Fund. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Director: Bud J. Harris

Department of Finance

RISK AND BENEFIT SERVICES Business Plan Fiscal Year

GENERAL FUND. General Fund

Department of Emergency Management

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT

GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE

Agency Page Information

2017 Technology Initiatives I/S Reserve Fund Projections Questions

CITY ATTORNEY MISSION STATEMENT

Kitsap County 2018 Budget Hearings. September 13 22, 2017

MARION COUNTY FY BUDGET BY DEPARTMENT COUNTY CLERK COUNTY CLERK. Clerk. Elections MISSION STATEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

City of. Carmelita Flagpole, circa 1927

Fiscal Services County Administration Building 300 Monroe Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone (616) Fax: (616)

CITY OF PASADENA CITY ATTORNEY

MARION COUNTY FY BUDGET BY DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR ASSESSOR/TAX. Special Projects MISSION STATEMENT

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR S OFFICE

CITY CLERK MISSION STATEMENT STRUCTURE AND SERVICES

AUDITOR - CONTROLLER Marcia Salter, Auditor-Controller

PUBLIC DEFENDER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions $ 10,290,180 -

What Does a Risk Manager Do? By Keith Wentz, Risk Management and Underwriting Manager, CCAP

FINANCE. Butterfly Garden Hastings Branch Library

GENERAL FUND. General Fund Revenues

GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET DETAIL

DEVELOPMENT PHILOSOPHY The recommended budget aligns the County s resources with the Council s identified governing priorities:

County Executive Office

Meeting Date: December 4, 2017 Agenda Item No: 4th Quarter Budget Amendment 2017

TOWN OF EATONVILLE CRA SOLICITATION FOR CONTINUING SERVICES CS # Enhanced Code Enforcement Officer

General Fund Revenues

Kitsap County 2019 Annual Budget

Pierce County, Washington 2017 Budget

The total budget for this department is $7,841,325, which funds the following services in these approximate amounts:

JOSEPHINE COUNTY, OREGON Table of Contents. Mental Health Fund

AUDITOR - CONTROLLER Marcia Salter, Auditor-Controller

DEVELOPMENT PHILOSOPHY

Finance. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $19,965,596

% offers rejected versus offers tendered. NA NA 2% # of involuntary separations during probationary period.

O r g a n i z a t i o n s

Treasurer. The major responsibilities of the county treasurer can be summarized in the following areas. Receipting and accounting of revenue

206 Child Support Services Jim Kucharek, Child Support Services Director

Request for Proposals (RFP) For Services as General Counsel San Gabriel River Discovery Center Authority

1. The City of Boise shall annually adopt a balanced budget where operating revenues are equal to, or exceed, operating expenditures.

Orange Paintbrush FIN. Finance

JOB DESCRIPTION. City Administrator

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

City of DuPont Financial Policies

Risk Management. Section Locator. Fiscal Year 2007 Adopted Budget Risk Management Program, $898,349. Background

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

Staffing ( ): Cost Center Numbers for employees: 4201, 4203, 4204, 4207, 4209

Division of Business Management Services

This page intentionally left blank

Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%

Jefferson Transit Authority Annual Budget. November 14, 2017 PROPOSED

GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET DETAIL

Internal Audit. Orange County Auditor-Controller

ASSESSOR- COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER

COUNTY OF SUTTER COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR

Reference 4E General Fund Operating Budget

AGRICULTURE & COOPERATIVE EXTENSION

INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL SERVICES

GOVERNMENT SERVICES TO RESIDENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS. AUDITOR Auditor Administration Elections...268

FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4427) Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report

CITY OF ALBANY GENERAL FUND PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET FISCAL YEAR & FISCAL YEAR

City of Youngstown FINANCE DIRECTOR

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

CORPORATE SERVICES GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE

TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR S DEPARTMENT

PLANNING 80 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $5,245, % of Community Development

Parks & Recreation. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $35,570,456. Community Development Expenditure Budget: $162,905,334

Jefferson Transit Authority Annual Budget. November 1, 2016 PROPOSED

Page Intentionally Blank

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Town Manager s Office

Circuit Court Judges. Mission Statement. Citizens. Chief Judge. Judges. Circuit Court Judges Chamber. Judicial Administration

Auditor's Office - General Fund. Staffing. Expenses

VILLAGE OF WINFIELD REVENUE AND CASH MANAGEMENT POLICY

BRICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION NEW JERSEY

FINANCIAL SECTION. Financial Section

Combining And Individual Fund Statements And Schedules

Gregory Levin, CPA Department Directors Assistant County Executive Officers Fiscal and Policy Analysts

Kitsap County 2019 Annual Budget

FINANCE. Executive Manager. Finance. Administration. Treasury Treasury Administration Cash Management Delinquent Collections 1345

CLERK-RECORDER-ASSESSOR

INTERNAL CONTROL IMPACT OF STAFF REDUCTIONS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES

Richard Price, Agricultural Commissioner

Washington State Auditor Troy Kelley

CPHD DEVELOPMENT FUND Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development DEVELOPMENT FUND SUMMARY

FINANCE MANAGER ABOUT THIS OPPORTUNITY WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICT IS SEEKING A NEW FINANCE MANAGER

Annual Audit Plan Report Fiscal Year 2018

2400: Contracts - General

PROGRAM I - PUBLIC PROTECTION FY BUDGET AUGMENTATION REQUEST SUMMARY

IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTICS

COUNTY COUNSEL Alison Barratt-Green, County Counsel

Transcription:

Mission: The Department of Administrative Services (DAS) consists of three General Fund divisions that operate under the Board of County Commissioners. DAS provides County departments and elected offices centralized financial and general administrative services, assists in optimizing their services in a cost-effective and efficient manner. Financial and Administrative Services 29% Program Allocation Purchasing 22% Allocation of General Fund 1% Budget 9% Revenue 218 219 Change Taxes $ $ N/A License and Permits $ $ N/A Intergovernmental $ $ N/A Charges for Services $ $ N/A Fines and Forfeits $ $ N/A Misc/Other $ $ N/A TOTAL REVENUE $ $ N/A Expenses 218 219 Change Salaries & Benefits $61,228 $63,17-2% Supplies $7,85 $9,25 18% Services $36,6 $36,5 % Interfund Payments $96,963 $93, -% Other Uses $ $ N/A TOTAL EXPENSES $755,61 $71,771-2% FTEs (Full Time Equivalents) 5.6 5.3 -.12 Kaizens JDIs Training Trained Certified 2 Implemented 7 15 1 5 11 6 Yellow Green 2 Champions PEAK Program Cost Savings Key Outcomes $6, $5, $, $3, $2, $1, $- Kaizen JDI $26,36 $265,36 $556,167 $565,873 - Four Green Belt Candidates in the Budget Office - Increased utilization of Hubble software among departments and offices - Coordination of Hubble and PowerBI to engage users in advanced data analytics and increase access to information

Program Title: Purchasing Program Budget: $162,39 The Purchasing Division assists departments and offices in securing goods, services, and public works projects for the County utilizing ethically competitive purchasing methods. This Division works with departments and offices to process purchase requisitions, determine appropriate purchasing methods, obtain quotes, develop standard specifications, and to solicit bids and requests for proposals. The Division interacts with vendors to resolve problems, expedite orders, Purpose facilitate bid openings and evaluation committees, as well as make recommendations for bid awards. The Division also assists with the administration and negotiation of contracts for a wide range of services. The mission of the Purchasing Division is to provide excellent service to its customers toward the completion of departmental and office missions and the facilitation of County-wide cost control by securing quality goods and services in a timely fashion, utilizing legally compliant and economical methods. The services provided to all departments and offices facilitate the meeting of their program goals by enabling cost-efficiency through a competitive purchasing process designed to not only comply with legal and ethical requirements, but to maximize the County's purchasing power. As resources Strategy continue to diminish, it has become increasingly important to the financial health of the County to employ innovative purchasing techniques such as the use of electronic commerce and purchasing card programs. These innovations reduce administrative processing times and accomplish the minimum requirements of the program for as little cost as possible. Results The Purchasing Division has updated the County Ordinance to reflect recent changes in State law and has successfully administered bids and requests for proposal with no protests. The Purchasing Division will continue evaluating the possible implementation of a module in the financial management system which would allow for requisition entry by the user and subsequent electronic approval of the purchase after receipt. Quality Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. % increase in Green Purchasing (Office Depot) 3% 3% 21% 6% 6% 6% 2. Rebate from use of Purchasing Card (Office $2, $1,851 $1,982 $2,96 $2,83 $2,2 Depot) Workload Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. Number of Purchase Orders Processed 2. Number of Bids Processed 3. Number of RFP/RFQ s Processed Budget Totals 1,5 1,5 1,62 1,38 1,253 1,17 5 38 33 25 38 35 5 31 5 28 3 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual Revenues $ $ $ $ $ $ Expenditures $162,39 $19,9 $16,317 $13,39 $191,92 $165,57 Difference ($162,39) ($19,9) ($16,317) ($13,39) ($191,92) ($165,57) # of FTEs 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.97 1.8

Program Title: Budget Program Budget: $361,123 Purpose The Budget Division manages the budget process as well as provides financial analysis to the Board of County Commissioners, all departments, and elected offices. Staff monitor and support all funds including the general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, capital project funds, and internal service funds. Strategy The Budget Division provides a streamlined and transparent process regarding the allocation of funds each calendar year by providing analytical information to the Board of County Commissioners for fiscal decision-making. This program supports the strategic goals of the Board, specifically in the areas of Inclusive Government and Effective and Efficient County Services. Results This Division has improved many functions of the budget building process and monthly status reporting. In 215, the focus was on eliminating the need for paper copies of reports and documents and enhanced use of network resources such as SharePoint. In 216, staff continues to expand the capabilities of the Hubble application (formerly Insight) which has provided further efficiencies in processes for both the analysts and also staff in other departments and offices. Quality Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. Budget Analyst Training Hours 3. General Fund Reserve as a % of Total Expenditures 12 165 6 182 1 12 21% 17% 21% 2% 23% 15% Workload Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. # of Cost Centers Monitored 22 23 259 2 282 276 2. # of Contracts Reviewed 7 65 87 65 59 69 3. # of Budget Related Agenda Items Presented Budget Totals 2 25 22 22 9 26 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual Revenues $ $ $ $ $ $ Expenditures $361,123 $1,718 $37,78 $369,62 $328,516 $288,93 Difference ($361,123) ($1,718) ($37,78) ($369,62) ($328,516) ($288,93) # of FTEs 2.75 3.15 3.15 3.38 3.38.5

Program Title: Financial and Administrative Services Program Budget: $218,339 Purpose The Financial and Administrative Services Division provides payroll, accounts payable, and contract support to the departments/offices of Administrative Services, Information Services, Parks and Recreation, Human Resources, Facilities Maintenance, Coroner, Risk Management, and the Board of County Commissioners. This Division maintains the security access system for the Port Orchard campus including system access card processing and ID badge management. The Commute Trip Reduction program is administered by this Division including the maintenance of parking assignments and other related responsibilities. Strategy The Financial and Administrative Services Division provides a consolidated approach to the accounting and payroll functions provided to departments/offices through legally compliant and ethical financial practices. This program supports the strategic goals of the Board of County Commissioners, specifically in the areas of Inclusive Government and Effective and Efficient County Services. Results It is estimated that the consolidation of A/P, payroll, and contract services with the above listed departments/offices has saved over $2.5 Million since 29 and further opportunities for consolidation are being explored. Quality Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. Number of FTEs Not Needed as a Result of Consolidation 6 6 6 6 7 6 2. Savings through Consolidation $3, $33, $335, $33, $385, $33, Workload Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. Number of A/P Vouchers Processed 2. Number of Employees Processed through Payroll 8,5 6,8 8,21 7,8 6,757 6,5 2 185 26 179 15 2 3. # of Contracts Processed 5 65 8 51 61 95 Budget Totals 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual Revenues $ $ $ $ $ $ Expenditures $218,339 $23,983 $168,89 $165,582 $17,317 $11,899 Difference ($218,339) ($23,983) ($168,89) ($165,582) ($17,317) ($11,899) # of FTEs 1.29 1.11 1.11 1.16 1.36 1.5

Department of Administrative Services - 219 Director (.65) Admin Manager (.5) Financial Supervisor (.75) Programs Analyst Financial Analyst (.5) Financial Analyst (1.75) Fiscal Support Technician (.2) Fiscal Support Technician* Fiscal Support Technician* *FTEs are paid from different Cost Centers

Mission: It is our mission to serve the courts and the citizens of Kitsap County in a manner best suited to provide quality, efficient, and effective service. We believe the public has a right to employees who embody the highest standards of excellence, integrity, and fairness. The Office of Public Defense provides effective indigent defense counsel through a mixed system of in-house and contract attorneys. Program Allocation Public Defense 1% Allocation of General Fund % Revenue 218 219 Change Taxes $ $ N/A License and Permits $ $ N/A Intergovernmental $211,71 $211,71 % Charges for Services $12, $12, % Fines and Forfeits $5 $5 % Misc/Other $ $ N/A TOTAL REVENUE $22,21 $22,21 % Expenses 218 219 Change Salaries & Benefits $1,28,573 $1,66,188 12% Supplies $1,7 $11,2 5% Services $1,661,17 $2,317,657 % Interfund Payments $73,2 $92,696 27% Other Uses $ $ N/A TOTAL EXPENSES $3,173,62 $,27,71 27% FTEs (Full Time Equivalents) 12.1 1.1 2. Kaizens JDIs Training Trained Certified 2 Implemented 7 15 1 5 11 6 Yellow Green 2 Champions PEAK Program Cost Savings Key Outcomes $6, $5, $, $3, $2, $1, $- Kaizen JDI $26,36 $265,36 $556,167 $565,873

Program Title: Public Defense Program Budget: $,27,71 Purpose All persons determined to be indigent are entitled to an attorney at all stages of proceedings. The United States Supreme Court, as a result of court decisions from the 196 s, gave this responsibility to the individual states. In Washington State, this state responsibility was handed off to the counties and cities as an unfunded mandate. Over the last eight years the State has assumed a small part of the cost of this responsibility through state grants from the State Office of Public Defense (SOPD) for public defense improvement initiatives and funding parent representation in dependency cases through direct contracting with private attorneys. Kitsap County has moved from providing all public defense services through contract attorneys to a mixed system of contract attorneys and in-house felony attorneys at a substantial cost savings. Strategy This program is required by law. The citizens of Kitsap County should be proud that within the confines of constitutional and statutory constraints, a way has been found to provide effective counsel through a mixed system of in-house attorneys and contract attorneys for less money than contracting out all cases to private attorneys. Results Bringing Public Defense services partially in-house, including investigations, has resulted in substantial cost savings to Kitsap County while maintaining high quality public defense services. Each felony attorney we hire in-house can handle 15 felony cases per year that we would otherwise have to pay a contract attorney for at the rate of $1,2 per case x 15 = $18,. Salary and benefits for a new in-house attorney are around $9, per year for a net savings of $9, for each new felony attorney hired. Quality Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. Cost per Misdemeanor Case $25 $25 $25 $25 $225 $225 2. Cost per Felony Case $1,2 $1,2 $1,2 $1,2 $1,135 $1,135 Workload Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1. # Adult Misdemeanor Cases 1,7 1,7 1,797 1,7 1,618 2,17 2. Cost of Misdemeanor Defense $35, $35, $9,25 $26, $36,5 $79,75 Budget Totals 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual Revenues $22,21 $22,21 $12,39 $239,57 $269,21 $21,6 Expenditures $,27,71 $3,173,62 $3,782,29 $3,599,766 $3,3,315 $3,25,763 Difference ($3,83,5) ($2,99,23) ($3,769,9) ($3,36,79) ($3,16,895) ($3,,299) # of FTEs 1.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 13.5

Public Defense - 219 Director of Administrative Services (.1) Attorney Office Support Supervisor Attorney 3 Investigator Program Specialist Office Support Specialist (3.) Attorney 2 (6.) *FTE is paid out of a different Cost Center

RISK MANAGEMENT Mission: The Risk Management Division s mission is to protect against the financial consequences of accidental catastrophic losses, preserve assets from destruction or depletion, minimize long term cost of all activities related to identification, prevention, and control of accidental losses; and to assist in the establishment of a safe work environment. Program Allocation Allocation of Internal Service Funds 9% Risk Management 1% 91% Revenue 218 219 Change Taxes $ $ N/A License and Permits $ $ N/A Intergovernmental $ $ N/A Charges for Services $ $ N/A Fines and Forfeits $ $ N/A Misc/Other $3,555,639 $,29,3 13% TOTAL REVENUE $3,555,639 $,29,3 13% Expenses 218 219 Change Salaries & Benefits $1,658,1 $1,69,186-1% Supplies $39,5 $39,5 % Services $2,268,9 $2,253,9-1% Interfund Payments $1,818 $3,58 % Other Uses $3,16 $95-7% TOTAL EXPENSES $,37,982 $,36,678-1% FTEs (Full Time Equivalents) 6.98 7..2 Kaizens JDIs Training Trained Certified Implemented PEAK Program Cost Savings Key Outcomes $556,167 $565,873 Risk Management will strive to have an additional representitive complete the yellow belt certification. Following completion of the training, Risk will review processes $26,36 $265,36 and practices and develop projects. Risk Management continually reviews processes and practices internally to ensure efficiency. $6, $5, $, $3, $2, $1, $- Kaizen JDI 2 15 1 5 11 6 Yellow Green 2 Champions

RISK MANAGEMENT Program Title: Risk Management Program Budget: $,36,678 Purpose The Risk Management Division (Risk) preserves Kitsap County's resources through the transfer, mitigation, financing, and segregation of risks. Risk administers the County's property and casualty, the self-insured worker's compensation, the LEOFF 1 Insurance programs, and records management and public disclosure. Risk Management consults, trains, and advises Kitsap County departments, elected offices, and employees regarding liability exposure reduction, both operational as well as contractual, loss control, and accident/illness prevention. Risk works closely with departments to identify measures to reduce risks. Strategy Results The mission of the Risk Management Division is to protect the County against the financial consequences of accidental catastrophic losses, to preserve County assets and public service capabilities from destruction or depletion; to minimize the total long term cost to the County of all activities related to the identification, prevention and control of accidental losses and the consequences; and to assist departments in the establishment of a safe work environment in which employees, as well as members of the general public, can enjoy safety and security. Timely reporting, prompt investigation, and early claims adjusting for liability claims has resulted in lower overall rates in the self-insurance liability program over the last several years. Prompt investigation, early intervention, and utilization of the return to work program have helped reduce significant increases in worker s compensation costs. With increased emphasis on accident prevention and changes to the return to work program, Worker's Comp costs should trend down and signifcant time loss claims should decrease. Quality Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1.Prop/Casualty Claims 5 5 5 9 2 9 2.Workers Comp Claims 8 8 78 9 9 9 Workload Indicators: 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual 1.Contracts Reviewed 7 7 987 877 665 697 2.Audits/Insp./Assts 12 12 8 1 12 7 3.Employees trained 8 8 76 62 825 76 Budget Totals 219 Submission 218 Budget 217 Actual 216 Actual 215 Actual 21 Actual Revenues $,29,3 $3,555,639 $3,877,693 $,297,529 $,13,21 $,1,128 Expenditures $,36,678 $,37,982 $3,589,72 $,12,65 $,6,95 $3,697,713 Difference ($317,68) ($815,33) $288,221 $155,6 $79,326 $316,1 # of FTEs 7. 6.98.63.3.33.33

Risk Management - 219 Kitsap County Citizens Board of County Commissioners* Financial Supervisor* (.25) Admin Services Director* (.2) Office Support Specialist** (.1) Program Manager Program Specialist (2.25) Program Specialist (3.) Human Resources Analyst* (.1) Human Resources Program Specialist* (.1) * FTE is paid out of a different Cost Center ** Administrative Support