Motivation: Two Basic Facts

Similar documents
Bank Runs, Prudential Tools and Social Welfare in a Global Game General Equilibrium Model

Staff Working Paper No. 732 Bank runs, prudential tools and social welfare in a global game general equilibrium model

Maturity Transformation and Liquidity

A Macroeconomic Model with Financial Panics

Credit Booms, Financial Crises and Macroprudential Policy

Global Games and Financial Fragility:

Crises and Prices: Information Aggregation, Multiplicity and Volatility

Banks and Liquidity Crises in Emerging Market Economies

Bailouts, Bail-ins and Banking Crises

Macroprudential Bank Capital Regulation in a Competitive Financial System

Dispersed Information, Monetary Policy and Central Bank Communication

Optimal Credit Market Policy. CEF 2018, Milan

A Macroeconomic Model with Financial Panics

A Model with Costly Enforcement

Endogenous Systemic Liquidity Risk

A Model of the Reserve Asset

To sell or to borrow?

Financial Fragility A Global-Games Approach Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Government Guarantees and Financial Stability

Multitask, Accountability, and Institutional Design

Estimating Macroeconomic Models of Financial Crises: An Endogenous Regime-Switching Approach

Contagious Adverse Selection

Banks and Liquidity Crises in an Emerging Economy

Credit Market Competition and Liquidity Crises

Banks and Liquidity Crises in Emerging Market Economies

A Model of Safe Asset Determination

Optimal Negative Interest Rates in the Liquidity Trap

Sovereign default and debt renegotiation

Notes on Financial Frictions Under Asymmetric Information and Costly State Verification. Lawrence Christiano

Optimal Incentive Contract with Costly and Flexible Monitoring

Banking Crises and the Lender of Last Resort: How crucial is the role of information?

Adverse Selection, Reputation and Sudden Collapses in Securitized Loan Markets

Bank Regulation under Fire Sale Externalities

Banking Crises and the Lender of Last Resort: How crucial is the role of information?

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Economics Department Bendheim Center for Finance. FINANCIAL CRISES ECO 575 (Part II) Spring Semester 2003

Revision Lecture Microeconomics of Banking MSc Finance: Theory of Finance I MSc Economics: Financial Economics I

Practice Problems 1: Moral Hazard

Minsky s Financial Instability Hypothesis and the Leverage Cycle 1

Endogenous probability of financial crises, lender of last resort, and the accumulation of international reserves

Foreign Competition and Banking Industry Dynamics: An Application to Mexico

Information Acquisition, Coordination, and Fundamentals in a Financial Crisis

Convertible Bonds and Bank Risk-taking

A Game Theoretic Approach to Promotion Design in Two-Sided Platforms

Capital Adequacy and Liquidity in Banking Dynamics

QED. Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No Junfeng Qiu Central University of Finance and Economics

Imperfect Transparency and the Risk of Securitization

Deposits and Bank Capital Structure

Intervention with Voluntary Participation in Global Games

The Ramsey Model. Lectures 11 to 14. Topics in Macroeconomics. November 10, 11, 24 & 25, 2008

Financial Frictions Under Asymmetric Information and Costly State Verification

Booms and Banking Crises

Convertible Bonds and Bank Risk-taking

Attention, Coordination, and Bounded Recall

Self-Fulfilling Credit Market Freezes

Financial Crises, Dollarization and Lending of Last Resort in Open Economies

Coordinating Monetary and Financial Regulatory Policies

Monetary Economics. Lecture 23a: inside and outside liquidity, part one. Chris Edmond. 2nd Semester 2014 (not examinable)

Systemic Loops and Liquidity Regulation

Bailouts, Bank Runs, and Signaling

Linear Capital Taxation and Tax Smoothing

Why are Banks Highly Interconnected?

Lender of Last Resort Policy: What Reforms are Necessary?

Almost essential MICROECONOMICS

WP/16/180. Market Frictions, Interbank Linkages and Excessive Interconnections. by Pragyan Deb

Game Theory: Global Games. Christoph Schottmüller

Lecture 5 Crisis: Sustainable Debt, Public Debt Crisis, and Bank Runs

An agent-based model for bank formation, bank runs and interbank networks

Peer Monitoring via Loss Mutualization

Stability Regulation. Jeremy C. Stein Harvard University and NBER

MOBILITY AND FISCAL IMBALANCE. Robin Boadway Queen s University, Canada. Jean-François Tremblay University of Ottawa, Canada

Information Acquisition and Response in Peer-Effects Networks

Evaluating Strategic Forecasters. Rahul Deb with Mallesh Pai (Rice) and Maher Said (NYU Stern) Becker Friedman Theory Conference III July 22, 2017

QI SHANG: General Equilibrium Analysis of Portfolio Benchmarking

Information aggregation for timing decision making.

A Macroeconomic Framework for Quantifying Systemic Risk

Rollover Risk, Liquidity and Macroprudential Regulation

Supplement to the lecture on the Diamond-Dybvig model

Monetary Easing and Financial Instability

Minsky s Financial Instability Hypothesis and the Leverage Cycle 1

Bank Capital Requirements: A Quantitative Analysis

Central bank liquidity provision, risktaking and economic efficiency

THE ECONOMICS OF BANK CAPITAL

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Preliminary Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2007

Misallocation and the Distribution of Global Volatility: Online Appendix on Alternative Microfoundations

14.02 Quiz 1, Spring 2012

Bank Networks: Contagion, Systemic Risk and Prudential Policy

The Real Business Cycle Model

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2016

A Macroeconomic Framework for Quantifying Systemic Risk

ILLIQUIDITY RISK AND LIQUIDITY REGULATION

Self-Fulfilling Credit Market Freezes

Topics in Contract Theory Lecture 3

Financial Intermediary Capital

Regulatory Arbitrage and Systemic Liquidity Crises

The Race for Priority

Asymmetric Information and Roll-Over Risk

Self-Fulfilling Credit Market Freezes

A Structural Model of Continuous Workout Mortgages (Preliminary Do not cite)

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2016

Public Goods Provision with Rent-Extracting Administrators

Transcription:

Motivation: Two Basic Facts 1 Primary objective of macroprudential policy: aligning financial system resilience with systemic risk to promote the real economy Systemic risk event Financial system resilience Market failures Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 2 / 27

Motivation: Two Basic Facts 1 Primary objective of macroprudential policy: aligning financial system resilience with systemic risk to promote the real economy Systemic risk event Financial system resilience Market failures 2 Bank runs as a typical symptom of financial crises in history Gorton (2012) Reinhart and Rogoff (2009) Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 2 / 27

What I Did Developed a two-period general equilibrium model that features 1 Bank runs (systemic event) in a global game framework 2 Endogenous probability of bank runs (banking system resilience) 3 Market failures? Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 3 / 27

What I Did Developed a two-period general equilibrium model that features 1 Bank runs (systemic event) in a global game framework 2 Endogenous probability of bank runs (banking system resilience) 3 Market failures? Conducted welfare analyses and studied macroprudential instruments: Leverage restriction (capital requirement) Liquidity requirement Sectoral requirement Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 3 / 27

Main Results 1 Excessive bank leverage 2 Insufficient bank liquidity 3 Too high crisis (system-wide bank run) probability 4 Need for policy coordination; risk migration Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 4 / 27

Main Results 1 Excessive bank leverage 2 Insufficient bank liquidity 3 Too high crisis (system-wide bank run) probability 4 Need for policy coordination; risk migration 5 Sources of inefficiencies: limited liability + externality specific to a global game; pecuniary externaility Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 4 / 27

Main Results 1 Excessive bank leverage 2 Insufficient bank liquidity 3 Too high crisis (system-wide bank run) probability 4 Need for policy coordination; risk migration 5 Sources of inefficiencies: limited liability + externality specific to a global game; pecuniary externaility 6 Applications Sectoral capital requirements and risk weights Risk taking Deposit insurance Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 4 / 27

Literature and Road Map Literature Rochet and Vives (2004) Diamond and Dybvig (1983) Carlsson and Van Damme (1993); Morris and Shin (1998) Christiano and Ikeda (2013, 2016) Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 5 / 27

Literature and Road Map Literature Rochet and Vives (2004) Diamond and Dybvig (1983) Carlsson and Van Damme (1993); Morris and Shin (1998) Christiano and Ikeda (2013, 2016) Road map Benchmark model with a bank leverage choice only Role of leverage restrictions (capital requirements) Extended model to incorporate a bank liquidity choice Extension to study sectoral capital requirements Example of risk-taking Preliminary result on the dynamic model Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 5 / 27

Two-period General Equilibrium Model: Environment Two periods, t = 1, 2 Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 6 / 27

Two-period General Equilibrium Model: Environment Two periods, t = 1, 2 Three types of agents Households Banks Fund managers Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 6 / 27

Two-period General Equilibrium Model: Environment Two periods, t = 1, 2 Three types of agents Households Banks Fund managers Endowment in t = 1 only Households: y > 0 (income) Banks: n > 0 (bank capital) Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 6 / 27

Two-period General Equilibrium Model: Environment Two periods, t = 1, 2 Three types of agents Households Banks Fund managers Endowment in t = 1 only Households: y > 0 (income) Banks: n > 0 (bank capital) All agents are competitive Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 6 / 27

Two-period General Equilibrium Model: Environment Two periods, t = 1, 2 Three types of agents Households Banks Fund managers Endowment in t = 1 only Households: y > 0 (income) Banks: n > 0 (bank capital) All agents are competitive Ownership: banks are owned by households Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 6 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d 2 (t = 1) Deposit management is delegated to fund managers Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d 2 (t = 1) Deposit management is delegated to fund managers 3 (t = 1) Banks make loans with the return given by R k N( R k, σ 2 R ) k Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d 2 (t = 1) Deposit management is delegated to fund managers 3 (t = 1) Banks make loans with the return given by R k N( R k, σ 2 R ) k 4 (t = 2) Bank asset return R k is realized, but yet to be known Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d 2 (t = 1) Deposit management is delegated to fund managers 3 (t = 1) Banks make loans with the return given by R k N( R k, σ 2 R ) k 4 (t = 2) Bank asset return R k is realized, but yet to be known 5 (t = 2) Fund manager receives signal s i = R k + ɛ i, where ɛ i N(0, σɛ 2 ), Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d 2 (t = 1) Deposit management is delegated to fund managers 3 (t = 1) Banks make loans with the return given by R k N( R k, σ 2 R ) k 4 (t = 2) Bank asset return R k is realized, but yet to be known 5 (t = 2) Fund manager receives signal s i = R k + ɛ i, where ɛ i N(0, σɛ 2 ), 6 (t = 2) Fund managers decide whether to withdraw deposits or not Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Timing of Events 1 (t = 1) Households consume c 1 and make deposits d 2 (t = 1) Deposit management is delegated to fund managers 3 (t = 1) Banks make loans with the return given by R k N( R k, σ 2 R ) k 4 (t = 2) Bank asset return R k is realized, but yet to be known 5 (t = 2) Fund manager receives signal s i = R k + ɛ i, where ɛ i N(0, σɛ 2 ), 6 (t = 2) Fund managers decide whether to withdraw deposits or not 7 (t = 2) Households receive interest and profits and consume c 2 Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 7 / 27

Households s.t. max u(c 1) + E(c 2 ), {c 1,c 2,d} c 1 + d y, c 2 vrd + π, where v = { 1 with prob.1 P (no bank default) < 1 with prob.p (bank default) Solution: supply curve of funds: R = u (y d) 1 P + E(v default)p Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 8 / 27

Fund Managers: Action and Payoff Fund managers are risk neutral Payoff structure for fund manager i (0, 1): Net benefit of Withdraw over Not withdraw { Γ 0 if bank defaults = Γ 1 if bank survives Fund manager i withdraws iff γ is exogenously given P }{{} i > Γ 1 γ, Γ 0 + Γ 1 Prob. of bank default perceived by i Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 9 / 27

Fund Managers: Threshold for R k Costly liquidation: early liquidation of one unit bank asset generates only a faction 1/(1 + λ) of R k, where λ > 0 Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 10 / 27

Fund Managers: Threshold for R k Costly liquidation: early liquidation of one unit bank asset generates only a faction 1/(1 + λ) of R k, where λ > 0 x = number of fund managers who withdraw deposits Let L (n + d)/n. In period t = 2, bank defaults iff or R k ( n + d) (1 + λ)xrd < (1 x)rd, ( R k < R 1 1 ) (1 + λx) L Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 10 / 27

Fund Managers: Threshold for R k Costly liquidation: early liquidation of one unit bank asset generates only a faction 1/(1 + λ) of R k, where λ > 0 x = number of fund managers who withdraw deposits Let L (n + d)/n. In period t = 2, bank defaults iff or R k ( n + d) (1 + λ)xrd < (1 x)rd, ( R k < R 1 1 ) (1 + λx) L Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 10 / 27

Fund Managers: Signal and Threshold Strategy Threshold strategy: withdraw if s i < s Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 11 / 27

Fund Managers: Signal and Threshold Strategy Threshold strategy: withdraw if s i < s Solution: Pr ( ( R k < R 1 L) 1 [ ] ) 1 + λx(r k, s ) s = γ, x(r k, s ) = Pr(R k + ɛ i < s ) Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 11 / 27

Fund Managers: Signal and Threshold Strategy Threshold strategy: withdraw if s i < s Solution: Pr ( ( R k < R 1 L) 1 [ ] ) 1 + λx(r k, s ) s = γ, x(r k, s ) = Pr(R k + ɛ i < s ) Bank goes bankrupt iff R k < R k ( R k R k ) P = Φ F (R k ) σ R k Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 11 / 27

Fund Managers: Signal and Threshold Strategy Threshold strategy: withdraw if s i < s Solution: Pr ( ( R k < R 1 L) 1 [ ] ) 1 + λx(r k, s ) s = γ, x(r k, s ) = Pr(R k + ɛ i < s ) Bank goes bankrupt iff R k < R k ( R k R k ) P = Φ F (R k ) Limit solution σ ɛ 0: s = R k = R σ R k ( 1 1 ) [1 + λ(1 γ)] L Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 11 / 27

Bank s Problem Bank defaults iff R k < R k Bank s problem: E(π) = max {L} R k (L) subject to L L max { [ ( )] } R k L R 1 + λx R k, s (L) (L 1) ndf (R k ) Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 12 / 27

Bank s Problem Bank defaults iff R k < R k Bank s problem: E(π) = max {L} R k (L) subject to L L max Optimality condition: { [ ( )] } R k L R 1 + λx R k, s (L) (L 1) ndf (R k ) 0 = R k df (R k ) (1 P)R Rλ R k ( x R k, s ) Rλ (L 1) R k s R k x s (L) L df ( R k) ( ) ( R k, s (L) df R k), Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 12 / 27

Bank s Problem, cont d Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 13 / 27

Competitive Equilibrium Bank optimality condition (limit case σ ɛ 0): [ ( R k df (R k ) = 1 F R k )] R R k ( +λ (1 γ) f R k ) [1 + λ (1 γ)] R 2 L 1 L 2 Household optimality condition: R = u (y (L 1)n) 1 P + E(v default)p Recovery rate } v = min {1, Rk L R L 1 λx(rk, s ) Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 14 / 27

Welfare Analysis Social planner problem: [ ] max SW = u(ȳ (L 1)n) + E(R k )L λe(x)r(l 1) n, L s.t. E(x) E[x(R k, s (L))], R = u (y d)/[1 P + E(v default)p] Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 15 / 27

Welfare Analysis Social planner problem: [ ] max SW = u(ȳ (L 1)n) + E(R k )L λe(x)r(l 1) n, L s.t. E(x) E[x(R k, s (L))], R = u (y d)/[1 P + E(v default)p] In the limit equilibrium σ ɛ 0: SW = u(y (L 1)n) + E(R k )Ln P λr(l 1)n }{{}}{{} Benefit of financial intermediation Cost of crisis Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 15 / 27

Excessive Bank Leverage Proposition (Excessive leverage) Suppose that the supply curve is upward sloping. Then, the bank leverage is excessive. Restricting bank leverage can improve social welfare. Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 16 / 27

Excessive Bank Leverage Proposition (Excessive leverage) Suppose that the supply curve is upward sloping. Then, the bank leverage is excessive. Restricting bank leverage can improve social welfare. Intuition: Average cost of bank default is endogenised, but, Marginal effect (cost) of leverage is underestimated due to limited liability and the global game setup Default cost pecuniary externality Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 16 / 27

Effects of Leverage Restrictions Competitive equilibrium: L = 10, P = 5% Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 17 / 27

Extended Model with Leverage and Liquidity Banks have an access to safe asset technology with gross return 1 Banks use safe assets in response to early withdrawals Trade-off: less return vs lower probability of bank runs Liquidity-deposit ratio m M/d Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 18 / 27

Extended Model with Leverage and Liquidity Banks have an access to safe asset technology with gross return 1 Banks use safe assets in response to early withdrawals Trade-off: less return vs lower probability of bank runs Liquidity-deposit ratio m M/d Proposition (Excessive leverage and insufficient liquidity) Given bank liquidity, bank leverage is excessive Given bank leverage, bank liquidity is insufficient Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 18 / 27

Leverage or Liquidity Requirements Only: Risk Migration Competitive equilibrium: L = 11.3, m = 0.12, P = 2.2% Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 19 / 27

Joint Effects of Leverage and Liquidity Requirements Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 20 / 27

Application 1: Sectoral Capital Requirements Two sectors and two types of banks Type-j bank specializes in lending to sector j {1, 2} Sector 2 is risker than sector 1 Competitive equilibrium: L 1 = 10.8, P 1 = 6.5%, L 2 = 7.7, P 2 = 9.6% Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 21 / 27

Effects of Sectoral Leverage Restrictions Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 22 / 27

Effects of Leverage Restrictions in One Sector Only Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 23 / 27

Application 2: Risk Taking One type of bank but two types of loans For simplicity, R k j N( R k, σ 2 R k ) for j {1, 2}. Loan portfolio [θ, 1 θ] on loans 1 and 2 Portfolio θ = 1/2 minimizes the risk (volatility) of bank loans Social optimum: θ = 1/2. Do banks choose θ = 1/2? Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 24 / 27

Banks prefer a higher risk than the socially optimal level Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 25 / 27

Bank Runs in an Infinite Horizon Model (work in progress) Figure: Impulse responses to a severe negative TFP shock Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 26 / 27

Conclusion and Future Research Agenda This model provides a unified framework for analysing banking crises, banks behaviour and macroprudential policy Further research 1 Ex-ante and ex-post policy coordination 2 Dynamic model; dynamic properties of macroprudential policy 3 Macroprudential policy and monetary policy Ikeda (BoE) Bank Runs and Macroprudential Instruments 3 November 2017 27 / 27