Transportation Theory and Applications

Similar documents
Modal Split. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Mode choice 2

Transportation Theory and Applications

P = The model satisfied the Luce s axiom of independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) which can be stated as

Aggregated Binary Logit Modal-Split Model Calibration: An Evaluation for Istanbul

Modeling the Response to Parking Policy

PUBLIC TRANSPORT TRIP GENERATION PARAMETERS FOR SOUTH AFRICA

Elastic demand solution methods

Drawbacks of MNL. MNL may not work well in either of the following cases due to its IIA property:

Logit with multiple alternatives

Day 3. Other Word Problems. Practice: Direct Variation

Transportation Economics and Decision Making. L e c t u r e - 7

The use of logit model for modal split estimation: a case study

TECHNICAL NOTE. 1 Purpose of This Document. 2 Basic Assessment Specification

Puget Sound 4K Model Version Draft Model Documentation

Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis

UNIT 1: Ratios, Rates, & Proportions

Appendix C: Modeling Process

Chapter 5. Continuous Random Variables and Probability Distributions. 5.1 Continuous Random Variables

CBA of transport infrastructure projects in Germany

Phase 2 Preliminary Business Case. Appendix E Wider Impacts Report

Satisfaction with getting to work 57% 14% 13% 9% Total distance travelled. miles per week

TSHWANE BRT: Development of a Traffic Model for the BRT Corridor Phase 1A Lines 1 and 2

Answer Young People Just Like Old People? Impacts and Consequences of Different Household Travel Survey Methods

CE 561 Lecture Notes. Transportation System Performance. Set 4. -interaction between demand and supply Demand

Practical issues with DTA

Calibration of Nested-Logit Mode-Choice Models for Florida

Interior Health Authority Board Manual 3.6 DIRECTOR RETAINERS, FEES AND EXPENSES

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

Economic Impact Analysis of the Downtown Green Line Vision Plan and Georgia Multi-modal Passenger Terminal

HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail

Expense Report Guide

Table 7. MMUTIS Detailed Zoning System. Metro Manila (265) Adjoining Areas (51) 78 zones. Source: MMUTIS, 1996

Car-Rider Segmentation According to Riding Status and Investment in Car Mobility

Transportation Economics and Decision Making. Lecture-11

Departmental Spending. Department for Transport

Arithmetic Revision Sheet Questions 1 and 2 of Paper 1

Economics 312: Urban Land Economics University of Victoria Midterm Examination #2 VERSION 1 SOLUTIONS

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

BAKERY vs PUBLIC GOOD

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 6-1

Public Transport Affordability and Subsidy Policies: A case study of Santiago, Chile. Andrés Gómez-Lobo Transport Forum March 28, 2007

Transportation Research Forum

Funding Infrastructure to Support Growth. November 2016

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

I Quick Review. > A rate is a comparison of two quantities measured in different units. i

2013 Household Travel Survey: High Level Overview

Wiz. M ath. Slope - intercept Form y = mx + b. Solve and check answers. Practice Problems. 4. y = y = 3x + 7. y = x No. 3.

UMTA & UTF: NATIONAL WORKSHOP GENERIC V/S CITY SPECIFIC UTF

FUNDING TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS. Partners in Planning March 8, 2014

DRAFT. Relationship of Asset Condition Rating to Transit System Performance. Prepared for. Transportation Research Board

b) According to the statistics above the graph, the slope is What are the units and meaning of this value?

Note about socio-economic calculations

SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN TRAINING WORKSHOP. Module 6 Implementation Plan

Appendix G TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION

Strategic Performance measures

Downtown Syracuse Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Study. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Chapter ! Bell Shaped

NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE GRADE 12

ARTA 22 months on. Have we made a difference to transport in Auckland?

Revised. April Travel Policy

Government Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement

TYNE AND WEAR CITY REGION CASE STUDY

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS. A. Introduction

POLICY AND PROCEDURE STATEMENT

Mathematics for Work and Everyday Life, Grade 11

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS

DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL. SUPPLEMENTARY DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION SCHEME (under Section 49, Planning & Development Act, 2000 as amended)

Rail and Competition. Workshop Universität Gießen. Guido Friebel Goethe Universität Frankfurt 27 May 2010

Planning Board Roundtable 12/3/15

Coordinating Urban Land Use, Transportation Pricing & Public Policy

Chapter 9. Chapters 5 8 Review, pages Analysing Graphs of Linear Relations, pages

THE COBA 2018 USER MANUAL PART 1 ECONOMIC CONCEPTS IN COBA. Contents. Chapter. 1. The COBA Method. 2. The Do-Minimum and Do-Something Options

Congestion Charge and Return Schemes on Modal Choice between Road and Railroad

Peer Agency: King County Metro

2. Does each situation represent direct variation or partial variation? a) Lily is paid $5 per hour for raking leaves.

2015 Edmonton and Region Household Travel Survey

Chapter 32 Exercise 32.1

Grandview Heights NCP Area #4 - Stage One Transportation Study

15,790. Bryan Waco Region. Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

17,321 13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle?

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

The Multinomial Logit Model Revisited: A Semiparametric Approach in Discrete Choice Analysis

ONBOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION STUDY

The evaluation of transport public policies on commuters travels environmental consequences

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

Demand estimation of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) using stated preference technique and binary logit models

Wonderlic WPT-R. Wonderlic Personnel Test.

Mini-Lecture 3.1 Measures of Central Tendency

Employee Travel Policy Updates

Queensland University of Technology Transport Data Analysis and Modeling Methodologies

Six Best Practices for Creating a Comprehensive Plan. Mitchell Silver, FAICP Memphis, TN

Public Works and Development Services

Rocky Mountain Rail Authority (RMRA)

Urban Transportation Planning Model Update - Phase II TASK E DEVELOP STANDARDIZED MODAL SPLIT MODELS

Guide to Planning Mathematics for Work and Everyday Life, Grade 11, Workplace Preparation (MEL3E)

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

Existing Conditions/Studies

Expenses are reimbursable when it is a part of an employee s job function. These expenses include:

BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROGRAM WITH ROUTE CHOICE CONSIDERATION

Transcription:

Fall 2017 - MTAT.08.043 Transportation Theory and Applications Lecture V: Modal split A. Hadachi

General Overview Idea After trip generation process and creating the new OD-matrix we slice it into number of matrices representing different mode of transportation Car Bus OD-Matrix Ship Train

objective Factors affecting mode choice Based on available data choose the right mode choice models Estimating model split direct generation models trip end models trip interchange models logit models

Mode choice Process by which the trips between traffic analysis zones in study area are allocated to available modes Factors affecting the choice of mode: characteristics of the trip Distance Travel time Purpose characteristics of the transportation system Time schedule Waiting time Transit time Cost characteristics of the trip maker Financial situation Trip members Vehicles available

Mode choice The four most common models applied are: Direct generation models Trip End models Trip Interchange Models Logit Models

Method 1 Direct generation model

Direct generation models Estimate model trips based on population density Population density Transit Assumption We assume that the systems attributes are not relevant to analysis. (e.g. travel times, cost, etc.)

Direct generation model Demonstration Example: Let s determine the number of transit trips per day in a specific zone which has 5000 people living on 50 acres (1 acre = 4046m 2 ). 40% no-auto household and 60% one-auto household Transit trips/day/1000 population 600 400 200 50 100 150 200 no-auto/h 1-auto/H Person/Acre

Direct generation model Demonstration Example: Calculate population density = 5000/50 = 100 persons/acre Transit trips/day/1000 population 600 510 400 250 200 50 100 150 200 no-auto/h 1-auto/H Person/Acre

Direct generation model Demonstration Example: Summary from figure: For no-auto household: 510 transit trips/day/ 1000 population For 1-auto household: 250 transit trips/day/ 1000 population Then total trips: (0.4*510*5)+(0.6*250*5)= 1770 transit/day

Method 2 Trip end model

Trip end model Allocating transit prior trip distribution using mode split curve. Reminder: Trip generation Trip distribution Modal split Transit Estimation Remarks: Transit estimation are based on land use (e.g. population density) Trip end model does not take into account quality of service

Trip end model Process: 1.Generating OD- matrix (total trip production and attractions by trip purpose) 2.Compute urban traffic factor (reflect the relationship between the auto ownership and population density ) 3.Determine % of trips using transit using mode choice curve 4.Apply auto occupancy

Trip end model Demonstration via example: Determine the % of residents expected to use transit for a zone with 1.8 household per auto and a residential density of 15000 persons/km 2 Urban Traffic Factor 100 Transit Mode Split (%) 75 50 25 10 20 30 40 50 60 UTF

Trip end model Demonstration via example: UTF= (1/1000)*1.8*15000 = 27 Urban Traffic Factor 100 Transit Mode Split (%) 75 50 45% The expected % of transit mode split is ~45% 25 10 20 30 40 27 50 60 UTF

Method 3 Trip interchange model

Trip interchange model This model take into account level of service variables in estimating the transit mode split. such as: Travel time Excess time (e.g. waiting time) Travel costs Financial status of trip maker

Trip interchange model To perform trip interchange model, we have to compute promotion of trips between zone and impedance factor using QRS method (quick response system). Formula: MS t MS a I ijx I b ijt I b ija MS auto =[ ; or, Iijt b + ] MS transit =[ Ib ija Iijt b + ] Ib ija MS t =(1 MS a ) 100 : proportion of trips between zone i and j using transit : proportion of trips between zone i and j using auto : a value referred to as the impedance of travel of mode m, between i and j, which is a measure of the total cost of the trip impedance =(travel timein vehicle,min)+[2.5(excess time, min)] + (3 trip cost income earned, min ) x : b : an exponent, which depends on trip purpose t : transit mode a : auto mode

Trip interchange model travel time in-vehicle is the time spent travelling in the vehicle. excess time is time spent traveling but not in the vehicle, including waiting for any mean of transportation. The impedance factor is determined for each zone pair (i,j) and it represents a measure of the expenditure required to make the trip by either auto or transit.

Trip interchange model Information or data needed to estimate mode choice include: Distance between zones transit fare out-of-pocket cost parking cost highway and transit speed exponent value, b median income excess time

Trip interchange model Example. For illustrating the application of QRS method, we assume that the data shown in the table have been developed for travel between a suburban zone S and a downtown zone D. Determine the percent of work trips by auto and transit. An exponent value of 2.0 is used for work travel. Median income is 24.000 euros per year. Table: Travel data between two zones, S and D Auto Transit Distance 10km 8km Cost per km 0,15euros 0,10euros Ecess time 5 min 8 min Parking Cost 1,5euros(or 0,75/ - Speed 30km/h 20km/h

Trip interchange model

Method 4 logit model

logit model the idea behind this model is to consider the relative utility of each mode as a summation of each model attribute. the choice of a mode is expressed as probability distribution

logit model in case of two modes: auto (A) and transit (T) are being considered, then the probability pf selecting the auto as a mean of transportation is expressed as follows: P (A) = e U A e U A + e U T Cost for mode A and T out-of-pocket cost Parking cost U x = a 1 t v ij + a 2 t w ij + a 3 t t ij + a 4 t nij + a 5 F ij + a 6 Φ j + δ Travel time in-vehicle Walking time Waiting time Fare charge Parameter for confort

logit model

logit model