PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS. August The first multi-asset PPP to be undertaken in the US using a bundled approach;

Similar documents
PennDOT Rapid Bridge Replacement Project

Elazig Hospital PPP. June 2017

Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners LLC

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THE PENNSYLVANIA RAPID BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Solutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co. April 22, 2008

The Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships

THE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ( OTP3 )

Meeting the State s Transportation Needs Julie Brogan Deputy Director, ODOT Division of Innovative Delivery

Management s Discussion and Analysis

Review of Construction Contract CN157 with Gulf Group, Inc. Office of Operations Bureau of Design and Construction. Report: A-1617DEP-003

April 25, Martin Klepper Executive Director

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR STIP AND TIP MODIFICATIONS

Massachusetts State Treasurer s Office. Debt Management Department

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Modifications

A P3 Success Story RTD s EAGLE P3 Project

XII. Public Private Partnerships for Public Transport Investments

Exhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Lehigh Valley Transportation Study's Procedures for TIP M odifications

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Revisions

Introduction to Alternative Procurement Delivery

Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for Transportation Improvement Program Revisions

Value for Money (VfM) Analysis Virginia s experiences and lessons learned

India: Public Private Partnerships in Highways Sector

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Act 44 Financial Plan Fiscal Year 2017

ANNUAL LETTER. Visit our Highway Department Website!

I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings

VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT TRILLIUM HEALTH PARTNERS CREDIT VALLEY HOSPITAL SITE PRIORITY AREAS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) Central Valley Opportunity Center Winton Vocational Training Center Project Proposals Due: February 21, 2014

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan

Public Review Draft PORT OF HOOD RIVER RULE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR BRIDGE PROJECTS AND BRIDGE PROJECT ACTIVITIES

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION HIGHSPIRE, PENNSYLVANIA FORMAL TELEPHONE MEETING OCTOBER 7, :00 AM AGENDA

Improving Management Presentations

F = MA : CSG SLC WEBINAR DECEMBER 16, J. Douglas Koelemay, Director

P3 CONTRACTS. Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. November 2016

Debt. Summary of Policy. utilized in, lead and senior manager roles when appropriate

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

I-66 RFI Response Vinci Concessions USA 25 November 2013

P3 Financing. Barney Allison. Peter Luchetti. Alfonso Mendez. Partner, Nossaman LLP. Managing Partner, Table Rock Capital

Department of the Auditor General. Highlights

Markit iboxx infrastructure bond indices - measuring an emerging asset class. Investment Grade USD, EUR, GBP and USD High Yield February 2017

Stephen Gaj Leader, Asset Management Team Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction FHWA

LOCAL MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

MAJOR BUSINESS TERMS FOR THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DBFOM DELIVERY METHOD

MOTORIST TAXATION REVENUE AND ROAD SPENDING

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS What? Why? Who? How? Where? and Here. I-77 HOT Lanes P3 Project. Lake Norman Transportation Summit March 13, 2013

Conditions of Contract

Exhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

Exhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

LONG-TERM WARRANTY CONTRACTS RISK OR REWARD?

DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP, DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, FINANCE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT

Railroad DOT Mitigation Strategies (R16) Master Project Agreement

Municipality of the District of Chester

What Every Transportation Manager Should Know About GARVEEs

Florida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (RFQ)

DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

P3 Financing Stan Ladner, Butler Snow LLP Josh Evans, Bostonia Partners LLC

SINGLE ELECTRICITY MARKET COMMITTEE

Instructions for Completing the Annual Road and Street Finance Report

Allen County Highway Engineering Department Problems and Progress

Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control Procedure

The Bridges of Wellington County

Texas' LBJ Freeway Managed Lanes P3

SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania

AAPA Finance Seminar Seaport Project Financing

RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 67 TRANSPORTATION

Superannuation investment in infrastructure. Steps to further efficiency

North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee

PART 3. Comprehensive Agreement Between Department and Design-Builder

Pennsylvania Turnpike ----Public Ownership, Private

MassDOT Highway ACEC State Markets Conference April 5, Jonathan Gulliver, Highway Administrator John J. Bechard, P.E., Deputy Chief Engineer

State Infrastructure Bank Annual Report to the United States Department of Transportation

Anticipated Contract Value Bid Bond Change Order Client Services (CS) Client Services Agreement (CSA) Competitive Solicitation

Emergency Relief Program. Ammon Heier, FHWA ER Coordinator

Procurement. OP January 2011 Page 1 of 10. Revised July 1, 2014

Industry Guideline: Appointing property valuers when lending to small businesses and primary producers

An Overview of P3s in Maryland

Description of the Submission / Conditions Precedent

DRAFT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT UNDER THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1995 (AS AMENDED)

Debt Management Policy

Elizabeth River Crossings OpCo, LLC Midtown Tunnel Project Monthly Report Owners and Holders Pursuant to Continuing Disclosure Agreement

Subsection Policies (policy #)

Prioritising bridge replacements

2018 Annual Report. Highway Department Accomplishments

Appendix E: Revenues and Cost Estimates

MAINTENANCE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION, INSPECTION, AND REPORTING

Experience of Implementing Transportation PPPs in India. Abhijit Bhaumik August 6, 2015

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

I-77 Managed Lanes Project Project Update. Ned Curran & Louis Mitchell September 2014

Briefing Memorandum: Second Nile Crossing at Jinja- Uganda. ICA Meeting: Financing Transport for Growth in Africa

Plenary 2: Public-Private Partnerships. Monday, 12:00 to 13:00

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

The Transportation Partnership Opportunity Fund

What Are Availability-Based Projects?

STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GUIDELINES & MODEL

Transcription:

Image courtesy of Plenary Group (https://plenarygroup.com) August 2017 PROJECT OVERVIEW The USD 1.1 billion Pennsylvania Rapid Bridge Replacement (RBR) Project is the first multi-asset public-private partnership (PPP) project to be undertaken in the US, using a bundled contract approach to replace 558 structurally deficient (SD) bridges across Pennsylvania. The project is being delivered as a Design-Build-Finance- Operate-Maintain (DBFOM), availability payment, PPP concession, between the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and the Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners (PWKP) consortium. The consortium was awarded the contract in October 2014. The RBR Project could have significant applications in other US states, helping to boost the grade of America s infrastructure and address the backlog in civil infrastructure maintenance. Pennsylvania has over 4,500 SD bridges, the second highest figure in the country after Iowa. Roughly 20% of Pennsylvania s bridges are SD, while the national average is 9.1%. The RBR Project will make a substantial contribution to reducing the large backlog of SD bridges in the state. PWKP is managing the financing, design and construction of the replacement bridges and will then be responsible for their maintenance for 25 years after construction. Construction is expected to take approximately four years from commercial close. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS The first multi-asset PPP to be undertaken in the US using a bundled approach; The first PPP transaction in the state of Pennsylvania; The largest roadway project in Pennsylvania s history; The bundling of assets is expected to reduce the total cost of the project by 20%; Construction will occur at a much faster rate than what would have been achieved using a traditional procurement program; The largest ever Private Activity Bond (PAB) issuance in the history of the Federal PAB program (at time of issuance) (see the Financial Breakdown section of this note for details); US$721.5 million par value represents the largest ever allocated PAB issuance for a PPP transaction. The project will involve the full demolition and replacement of all 558 replacement bridges, which are primarily single and multi-span bridges on smaller state highways, many located in rural areas. The bridges in the project are of a similar size and design, allowing for prefabrication, mass production, equipment reutilisation and standardisation.

Multi-asset PPPs are already being used in many jurisdictions to replace and maintain existing civil infrastructure, such as street lighting and schools. Many of these assets have not traditionally been considered suitable for PPP delivery due to their inability to provide value for money as an individual asset or a small bundle. By bundling multiple assets into a single project on a larger scale, investors have the opportunity to participate in a broader range of infrastructure sectors, such as local road and water infrastructure, and community facilities. WHY USE THE PPP APPROACH? The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania decided to take advantage of two legislative changes to bring its SD bridges into a state of good repair: Act 88 (2012), which authorises public-private transportation projects in the state, and Act 89 (2013), which increased annual state highway funding by restructuring the state s gas tax and increasing a variety of fees. The reasons for using a PPP approach as opposed to a traditional procurement method are outlined below. Key Advantages: Cost reduction of 20% compared to original PennDOT estimates using a traditional procurement method; Estimated date of completion for all bridges is years in advance of PennDOT s original estimate using a non-ppp approach; Access to innovative design solutions, such as prefabrication of standardised construction materials; Greater incentives to deliver the project on time and within budget; Efficient service delivery linked to availability and milestone payments; Minimisation of transaction costs through a single procurement process; and Consistent risk allocation, enabling more efficient contract administration and allocation of resources. Bundling the bridges together in a multi-asset PPP contract is expected to reduce the total cost of replacing the bridges by 20%, and at a rate of replacement many years in advance of what the state would have been able to achieve under a non-ppp approach. PennDOT estimated that it would take up to 20 years to replace all of the bridges using a traditional procurement and construction program. The batching of the projects will allow the bridges to be replaced and maintained at an average cost of $1.6 million each, versus $2 million each if completed by PennDOT. The bridges selected as eligible for the project have similar characteristics; most importantly, they are relatively small and can be designed and constructed to standard sizes. The similarity of the bridges allows for streamlined design, prefabrication (mass production) of standardised components such as beams, and the replacements can be done relatively quickly. All of these factors make bundling the projects as one PPP contract the most efficient and cost effective way to deliver the bridge projects. PROJECT TIMELINE Key dates in the procurement timeline are shown below: December 2013 Requests For Qualification (RFQ) out for Pennsylvania bridges PPP. January 2014 RFQ deadline extension for Pennsylvania bridges PPP. March 2014 Four shortlisted on Pennsylvania bridges PPP. July 2014 US Department of Transportation approves PABs for Pennsylvania bridges PPP. October 2014 Plenary-Walsh team wins Pennsylvania bridges PPP. January 2015 Plenary reaches commercial close on Pennsylvania bridges PPP. March 2015 Plenary and Walsh reach financial close on Pennsylvania bridges PPP. June 2017 RBR Project s 200th bridge has just been completed. GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE HUB 02

CONTRACTUAL STRUCTURE The diagram below illustrates the main contractual components of the project structure. Private Activity Bondholders Project Partnership Agreement PennDot Payments Plenary Group & Walsh Investors Equity Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners (Development Entity) Bonds Debt Issuer (Pennsylvania Economic Development Authority) Design-Build Agreement Long-term Maintenance Agreement Walsh Construction Company & Granite Construction Company Walsh Infrastructure Management Design Contract HDR FINANCE BREAKDOWN SOURCE OF FUNDS Tax-exempt PABs Equity Milestone Payments Availability Payments TOTAL AMOUNT US$793 million US$58 million US$224 million US$35 million US$1.11 billion and priced with the lowest yields to maturity of any uninsured BBB level PPP bond issuance (at the time of issuance), with repayment sourced from milestone and availability payments throughout the 25-year operating term based on achievement of required asset performance levels. The equity providers were Plenary Group (80%) and Walsh Group (20%). Milestone Payments will be paid by PennDOT to PWKP according to a defined schedule and, while subject to deductions for non-performance, are also linked to the achievement of prescribed levels of work in place. The project is financed through a combination of taxexempt Private Activity Bonds (PABs), private equity, milestone payments, and availability payments. PABs refer to the application of tax exempt debt instruments for private investment, resulting in lower interest rates on the debt and access to the lower cost of capital from the US tax exempt bond market. The PABs for the Pennsylvania RBR Project were allocated by the US Department of Transportation (USDOT), structured and offered by Plenary, and received a BBB investment rating from S&P. The bonds were issued in tranches with maturities ranging from 4 to 28 years, The Availability Payments include both a fixed element (90%) and an indexed element (10%) which is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) following Substantial Project Completion. Monthly Availability Payments are calculated based on the proportional number of bridges to have achieved Substantial Completion, along with a deduction factor during the construction phase to incentivise full Project Completion. Availability payments are paid by PennDOT to PWKP and are subject to deductions for certain non-compliance as defined in the Public-Private Transportation Partnership Agreement (PPA) between PennDOT and PWKP, including lane closures, lack of prescribed NBIS (National Bridge Inspection Standards) bridge ratings, etc. GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE HUB 03

CONSTRUCTION More than 2,000 SD bridges were screened by PennDOT prior to issuance of the final Request for Proposals. A host of factors were considered, including age, length, number of lanes, and average daily traffic, as well as impact on utilities, railroads, and a wide range of potential environmental impacts. Walsh Construction and Granite Construction Joint Venture (Walsh/Granite) is subject to specific lane maintenance requirements, detour requirements and calendar restrictions pertaining to the construction scheduling and logistics for each replacement bridge. Single-span bridges will be allowed to close for no more than 75 days, and multiple-span bridges for no more than 110 days. The replacement bridges have been divided into two categories to facilitate the construction process: Early Completion Bridges (ECBs) Remaining Eligible Bridges (REBs) There are 87 ECBs, for which PennDOT provided TS&L (type, size and location) plans, government approvals, Right of Way, and utility clearances, to facilitate the start of construction in 2015. PWKP has full responsibility for the design, coordination of utility work, and acquiring the necessary permits and government approvals for the 471 REBs. The above arrangement was possible thanks to an Early Development Agreement between the US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and PennDOT, whereby the FHWA granted approval under SEP-15 1 to PennDOT to allow PWKP to obtain the necessary permits and approvals for each REB in the project. Ordinarily, it would be prohibited for the concessionaire, in this case PWKP, to be responsible for permitting and approvals under FHWA s Design-Build Contracting regulations. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The main ongoing operational responsibilities are as follows: PennDOT PWKP Snow and ice removal and control; Emergency and incident first response; Pavement striping, reflectors, etc.; Asphalt maintenance (after first 5 years); Vegetation control in right of way (off-structure). Maintain all bridges at a condition rating of NBIS 7 or greater; Perform bi-annual NBIS inspections and preventative maintenance; Traffic management during maintenance activities; Identify and correct all damages to the project from emergencies or incidents; Control any vegetation growth on the bridge structures; Maintain any stream channels within 50 feet of each bridge; Maintain asphalt pavement constructed as part of the work for 5 years from Substantial Project Completion; Provide a contact to receive public feedback on the bridges. The construction plan, using a local approach, envisions that the majority of bridge construction work will be performed primarily by Pennsylvania-based subcontractors. The large quantity of construction materials required for the project will also be primarily sourced from suppliers and fabricators located in and near Pennsylvania, providing a large and steady volume of orders over the three year construction period. Bridge designs and components will be standardised as much as possible to facilitate efficient design approvals, permitting, materials procurement, and construction. 1 The US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a division of the US Department of Transportation, established the SEP-15 program to encourage tests and experimentation in procurements of federal aid transportation projects. Among the specific objectives of SEP-15 is the promotion of project management flexibility, innovation, improved efficiency, and timely project implementation. SEP-15 addresses, but is not limited to, four major components of project delivery: contracting; compliance with environmental requirements; right-of-way acquisition and project finance. GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE HUB 04

APPENDIX Details of the Project The RBR Project is expected to create efficiencies through economies of scale, innovation and optimal risk allocation that will allow PennDOT to deliver more bridges faster and at a lower whole-life cost than is possible when using a traditional design, bid, build procurement. The RBR Project will improve the connectivity of Pennsylvania s transportation network, while minimising the impacts on the travelling public. The improved connectivity, including the removal or modification of certain weight restrictions on some replacement bridges, will increase the efficiency of freight and commercial movements, which will benefit the state s economy. Map of ECBs to be replaced in Pennsylvania. Map of REBs to be replaced in Pennsylvania. Images courtesy of BATIC Institute Additional details on the Pennsylvania RBR Project can be found at: http://www.penndot.gov/projectandprograms/p3forpa/pages/rapid-bridge-replacement-project.aspx http://parapidbridges.com https://plenarygroup.com/projects/north-america/pennsylvania-rapid-bridge-replacement The staff of the Global Infrastructure Hub (GI Hub) have prepared this summary of the Pennsylvania Rapid Bridge Replacement Project, and any opinions, findings and recommendations contained herein are not necessarily the views of the GI Hub Board of Directors, or the G20 member countries, or of other countries which are donors of the GI Hub. In this document, the GI Hub is not seeking to provide professional advice and, to the extent permitted by law, the GI Hub disclaims liability to any person or organisation in respect of anything done, or omitted to be done, in reliance upon information contained in this document. Office Address Level 23, 68 Pitt St Sydney NSW 2000 Postal Address PO Box R1947, Royal Exchange Sydney NSW 1225 Australia Tel +61 2 8315 5300 Email contact@gihub.org www.gihub.org