Looking Backward and Forward, Americans See Less Progress in Their Lives

Similar documents
Public Says a Secure Job Is the Ticket to the Middle Class

A Third of Americans Say They Like Doing Their Income Taxes

Adults in Their Late 30s Most Concerned More Americans Worry about Financing Retirement

Tax System Seen as Unfair, in Need of Overhaul

IV. EXPECTATIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Walking Away. A Third of the Public Says It s Sometimes OK to Stop Paying a Mortgage FOR RELEASE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2010

Sagging Personal Finances Halt a Gain in Confidence

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 19, 2013

Ratings of Finances Reach Two-Year High

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, April, 2017, With Budget Debate Looming, Growing Share of Public Prefers Bigger Government

Consumer Confidence Starts 2005 at Precisely its Long-Term Average

PRINCETON SURVEY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE PRESS STATE OF THE UNION POLL

PEW SOCIAL & DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS JULY 2012 MIDDLE CLASS UPDATE SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE JULY 16-JULY 26, 2012 TOTAL N=2,508

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Quality of Life in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being and Church Life: 2012 Nebraska Rural Poll Results: A Research Report

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

AMERICA AT HOME SURVEY American Attitudes on Homeownership, the Home-Buying Process, and the Impact of Student Loan Debt

Obama Job Approval Slips as Economic Pessimism Rises

Redistribution under OASDI: How Much and to Whom?

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Massachusetts Household Survey on Health Insurance Status, 2007

This document provides additional information on the survey, its respondents, and the variables

Consumer Perceptions and Reactions to the CARD Act

Confidence Edges Lower But Not All That Low

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Interview dates: October 23-30, 2006 Interviews: 900 black respondents, 706 registered voters, 361 likely voters (202)

Confidence Edges Up, But Expectations Are Grim

Well-Being in Non-Metropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of the Present and Views of the Future

Credit Crunch and Energy Costs Shadow Financial Outlook ECONOMIC INEQUALITY SEEN AS RISING, BOOM BYPASSES POOR

Economic Optimism Gains, But Current Ratings, Not So

2014 WINTER REPORT ON NEW JERSEY CONSUMER CONFIDENCE

Consumer Confidence Gains Some Ground

Confidence Edges Up As Gas Prices Abate

Public Attitudes Toward Social Security and Private Accounts

Segmentation Survey. Results of Quantitative Research

Two Weeks Before the Election Confidence is a Point from its Low

Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2008

NEW JERSEY VOTERS TELL RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL THAT COUNTRY WILL REMAIN DIVIDED

RICHARD A. EASTERLIN. Is Reported Happiness Five Years Ago Comparable to Present Happiness? A Cautionary Note

Boomers at Midlife. The AARP Life Stage Study. Wave 2

Heartland Monitor Poll XXI

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being Nebraska Rural Poll Results

PERCEPTIONS OF EXTREME WEATHER AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN VIRGINIA

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: NEW JERSEYANS WORRY ABOUT GUN VIOLENCE. Voters prefer controlling gun ownership to protecting owner rights

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE AND POLICY RESEARCH

Consumer Confidence Continues to Fade

Perceptions of Well-Being and Personal Finances Among Rural Nebraskans

Saving and Investing Among High Income African-American and White Americans

Consumer Overdraft Survey: Methodology and Topline Result

Kansas Policy Survey: Spring 2001 Survey Results Short Version

Client Experience With Investment Call Centers 2011 Investment Call Center Satisfaction Survey

Confidence Rests at a Five-Month Peak

GARDEN STATE IS OPTIMISTIC ABOUT BUSH S PRESIDENCY But Residents Affections Follow Clinton

EMBARGOED UNTIL 12:01AM THURSDAY APRIL 9, 2015 CHRISTIE S NEGATIVE RATINGS CONTINUE; NEW LOWS FOR OVERALL JOB APPROVAL, SANDY, AND TAXES

Gain on Personal Finances Tug Confidence to 2009 High

CHRISTIE RATING CLIMBS TO 50 PERCENT IN RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL

Now I have some questions about work and family

La Plata County Ballot Measure Poll May 2015

How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 National Adults

Eagleton Institute of Politics Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 191 Ryders Lane New Brunswick, New Jersey

How the Survey was Conducted

BY Kim Parker, Rich Morin and Juliana Horowitz

Quality of Life in Rural Nebraska: Trends and Changes

Consumer Confidence: Average

the General Assembly. That is compared to 41 percent who would prefer Republican control.

What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Presented by: Harris Poll

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016

Additional releases on voter reactions to the budget and the governor s education proposals will be provided over the coming week.

OVAL OFFICE, CHRISTIE PERFECT TOGETHER? NEW JERSEY VOTERS DON T SEE GOVERNOR AS GOOD FIT FOR PRESIDENT

How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 National Adults

How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist National Poll of 1,197 Adults

The Arkansas Poll, 2010 Summary Report

The August 2018 AP-NORC Center Poll

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: ADLER, RUNYAN TIED IN THIRD DISTRICT CONGRESSIONAL RACE

Ohio Voters Age 50+ and the 2014 Election. Key Findings from a Survey among Likely Voters Age 50/over Conducted June 2014 for

SLIM MAJORITY OF N.J. VOTERS APPROVE CHRISTIE S OVERALL JOB PERFORMANCE; REMAIN LESS POSITIVE ON MOST INDIVIDUAL ISSUES

FIVE MONTHS AFTER SANDY CHRISTIE STILL GOING STRONG, BUT RATINGS SHOW SOME SLIPPAGE, RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL FINDS

PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until 2:00 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Consumer Confidence Steady; Much Weaker in the Northeast

Fact Sheet. Health Insurance Coverage in Minnesota, Early Results from the 2009 Minnesota Health Access Survey. February, 2010

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: ADLER MAINTAINS LEAD IN 3RD DISTRICT

AARP Election Survey Results. U.S. National. Prepared for AARP Strategic Issues Research

Arkansas Voters Age 50+ and the 2014 Election. Key Findings from a Survey among Likely Voters Age 50/over Conducted June 2014 for

Perceptions of Long-term Care and the Economic Recession

THE IMPACT OF INTERGENERATIONAL WEALTH ON RETIREMENT

Michigan Voters Age 50+ and the 2014 Election. Key Findings from a Survey among Likely Voters Age 50/over Conducted June 2014 for

CCES 2014 Methods and Survey Procedures

The December 2017 AP-NORC Center Poll

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

PPI ALERT November 2011

Right direction 33% 34% Wrong track 57% 56% Neither 3% 2% Don t know / Refused 7% 7%

Voices of 50+ Hispanics in Arizona: Dreams & Challenges

Confidence and Oil Prices: A Potentially Volatile Mix

ASSOCIATED PRESS: TAXES STUDY CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS RELEASE DATE: APRIL 7, 2005 PROJECT # REGISTERED VOTERS/ PARTY AFFILIATION

2016 AARP SURVEY: GUBERNATORIAL ISSUES FACING NORTH CAROLINA VOTERS AGES 45+

OSBA State Funding Survey

Gas Prices Hurt, But it's Been Worse

Two Points from its Low, Confidence Looks Like 92

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

WHO S LEFT TO HIRE? WORKFORCE AND UNEMPLOYMENT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY BENJAMIN FRIEDMAN JANUARY 23, 2019

Transcription:

Looking Backward and Forward, Americans See Less Progress in Their Lives FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Paul Taylor, Executive Vice President Cary Funk, Senior Project Director Peyton Craighill, Project Director MEDIA INQUIRIES CONTACT: Pew Research Center 202 419 4332 http://pewresearch.org

1 Looking Backward and Forward, Americans See Less Progress in Their Lives In the past four years, some of the edge has come off good old American optimism. Just under half (49%) of the respondents in a new Pew Research Center survey rate the quality of the life they expect to be leading five years from now higher than their current quality of life. As recently as 2002, more than six-in-ten (61%) Americans said their future would be better than their present. The new Pew survey also finds that a quarter of adults rate their life five years from now the same as they rate their current life, while just 12% rate the future worse (the remaining 14% say they aren t sure). Thus, looking at only the "worse" and "better" ratings, Americans continue to tilt heavily positive by a ratio of four-toone in their outlook about the future. Even so, the downturn in personal optimism since 2002 is the sharpest recorded in the more than 40 years that both Pew and the Gallup organization have been conducting this "ladder of life" survey. 1 In the 2006 Pew survey, as in all previous surveys in this series, Americans rate the present above the past and the future above the present. However, taking into account all three sets of ratings (past, present, future), Americans are on average about one-third less upbeat about the trajectory of their lives now than they were in 1999, at the height of a prolonged economic boom. The Pew telephone survey was conducted from June 20 through July 16, 2006 among a What Does the Next Five Years Hold for You? Percent rating 70 60 50 40 30 20 51 30 Future BETTER than present Future SAME as present 10 7 7 12 Future WORSE than present 0 1964 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 Note: Based on ratings of your life today compared with your life five years from now Source: Surveys from 1964 to 1985 by Gallup How Have the Past Five Years Been for You? Percent rating 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 49 31 16 Present BETTER than past Present SAME as past Present WORSE than past 0 1964 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 Note: Based on ratings of your life today compared with your life five years ago Source: Surveys from 1964 to 1985 by Gallup 57 26 16 61 23 49 48 27 21 1 This battery of questions was developed by Hadley Cantril and colleagues and has been asked by a number of different organizations over the years. See Cantril, Hadley. 1965. The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

2 nationally representative sample of 2,003 adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. The ladder of life series employs what researchers call a self-anchoring scale. Respondents are first asked to give a numerical rating to their present quality of life. Then, having anchored themselves in the present, they are asked to rate the past and future the same way. They are not asked if they think the future (or past) is better or worse. They are simply asked, in succession, to rate three points in time on the same numerical scale. According to the 2006 survey, Americans on average give a 6.8 rating (on a zero to ten scale) to their current lives; a 6.1 rating to their lives five years ago and a 7.8 rating to the lives they expect to be leading in another five years. That adds up to an aggregate average of 1.7 rating points worth of forward progress between five years ago and five years hence. This 1.7 figure in 2006 is a bit below the historical average of 2.0 for all surveys taken since 1964. However, it is fully a third below the 1999 figure of 2.5 the highest measure of forward progress recorded by this battery of questions. In the seven years since 1999, the economic boom has long since passed and levels of satisfaction with the state of the nation have fallen off sharply. They are in the low 30 percent range now, down from the mid to high 50 percentage range in the late 1990s. So at a time when people have come to feel worse about the state of the nation, they are also feeling less optimistic about their own prospects for personal progress. The Changing Quality of Life: The Public Rates Their Present, Past and Future Mean ratings on 0 to 10 scale 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 5 years from now Present life 5 years ago 1964 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 Source: Surveys from 1964 to 1985 by Gallup This correlation may seem self-evident, but it needs to be kept in perspective. Survey researchers through the years have noted that there is very little correlation between satisfaction with one s own current quality of life and satisfaction with the current state of the nation 2. The former is a stable trend that changes little over time; the latter moves up and down a lot in response to changes in the economy or other major national events. However, it is not uncommon to find a correlation between feelings about the current state of the nation and feelings about one s future quality of life, as the latest Pew findings show. 7.8 6.8 6.1 2 Lipset, Seymour Martin and William Schneider. 1987. The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor and Government in the Public Mind, second edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

3 The Trajectory of Life Who s Moving Ahead? Needless to say, not all Americans are of the same mind as they assess whether they ve made progress in life and whether they expect to make more in the future. The groups most likely to forecast future personal progress include younger adults, blacks and Hispanics. The findings show that as people grow older, and especially as they move into their elderly years, their expectations for an improving quality of life decline sharply. Also, blacks and Hispanics are more likely than whites to forecast personal progress for themselves. (On the other hand, whites as a group place themselves considerably higher on the present ladder of life than either blacks or Hispanics place themselves.) The groups most likely to say they have made progress over the past five years include younger adults, college graduates and people with higher incomes. Most of these demographic differences have been present in the findings from this battery of questions over the years; however, the correlation between income levels and assessments of past progress have grown stronger over the course of the past four years. Future Outlook by Demographic Groups Comparing your present life with your future life Optmistic Life will be the same Pessimistic DK All adults Men Women White Black Hispanic 49 51 48 46 58 59 18-29 72 30-49 60 50-64 39 65+ 15 36 College grad Some college HS grad or less 47 57 47 Family Income: $100K+ $50K - $99K $30K - $49K Less than $30K 52 57 51 48 26 29 15 10 12 12 11 13 8 8 13 8 24 6 29 19 18 33 11 23 9 22 13 32 10 26 10 27 12 18 14 In 2002, 45% of those in the lowest income bracket saw themselves as having made progress, compared with 57% of those in the highest bracket a 12 percentage point gap. This year, 39% of those in the lowest bracket see themselves as having made progress, compared with 59% of those in the highest Republican Democrat Independent bracket a 20 percentage point gap. This gap, while significantly larger than it was four years earlier, is not unprecedented. 51 48 50 33 23 22 14 13 Note: Based on ratings of your life today compared with your life five years from now. Whites and blacks include all non-hispanic. Hispanics are of any race. 8

4 Where People Stand Now About four-in-ten (41%) Americans rate their life today on one of the top three steps of the ladder of life (from 8 to 10), three-in-ten put themselves just below that as a six or seven and 26% rate their life at the lower levels (from 0 to 5). These figures are about the same as they have been since 2002, though fewer put their life on the highest steps of the ladder today than did so in the late 1990 s. Present Ratings by Demographic Groups Percent rating their life today as high on the ladder of life (steps 8-10) All adults Men Women 41 38 43 Income is strongly correlated with how people rate their present life. Two-thirds of those with incomes of $100,000 or more place themselves on the three highest steps of the ladder (8 to 10). A quarter of those with incomes under $30,000 do the same. A multiple regression analysis found that income was the strongest socio demographic predictor of present life evaluations. 3 White Black Hispanic 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ 45 30 24 39 38 43 47 Other groups that are more likely to see themselves on the top three steps of the ladder include whites, more so than blacks or Hispanics; college graduates more so than those with less education; women more so than men; Republicans more so than either Democrats or independents; frequent church attendees more so than those who go to religious services less often; and married people more so than singles. These patterns have been present in this battery of questions over the years. College grad Some college HS grad or less Family Income: $100K+ $50K - $99K $30K - $49K Less than $30K People who live in areas with low unemployment say their quality of life is higher than do people who live in areas of high unemployment. And, not surprisingly, workers who say they are satisfied with their jobs are more likely to rate their overall quality of life higher. There are also correlations between one s level of work satisfaction and one s assessment of personal progress although, depending on the time frame, these correlations operate in opposite directions. People who are satisfied with their job are more likely than others to say they have made progress over the past five years. However, looking forward, the opposite is true: people who are dissatisfied with their job are more likely than others to say they expect to make progress in the next five years. 49 42 35 43 40 67 Note: Whites and blacks include all non-hispanic. Hispanics are of any race. 3 Based on a linear regression analysis predicting ladder of life evaluations from the following independent variables: gender, race, age, education, income, party identification, marital status, having minor-age children, church attendance, and local unemployment conditions.

5 International Comparisons In 2002 the Pew Global Attitudes Survey administered this same ladder of life battery of questions in 44 countries; it found that Americans placed in the middle to upper middle ranges compared with publics of other countries. Looking backward, Americans were more inclined to say they had made progress than were the publics of any country surveyed in Europe or the Middle East and most of the countries surveyed in Asia, Latin America and Africa. Looking forward, Americans were more optimistic than almost all of the publics of Europe, the Middle East and Latin America, but were less optimistic than most of the publics of Africa and Asia. How Come the Future Never Lives Up to Its Advance Billing? Year after year, these ladder of life survey findings all share the same anomaly: the future, once it finally arrives, never measures up to today s expectation of it. To give just one example, in 1997 the public, on average, expected to enjoy an 8.2 quality of life in 2002. But by the time 2002 rolled around, the public, on average, rated the present as just a 6.9. (See chart.) This apparent paradox in human perception applies to self-assessments of the past as well (the public rates the past worse in retrospect than they rated it at the time). As a result, at any given moment, the public as a whole believe they were worse off in the past and will be better off in the future. That suggests a blissful state of constant human progress. But there s just one problem: over the course of time, the public s evaluations of the present rarely changes. So what gives? Some psychologists have theorized that human beings are hard-wired to imagine brighter tomorrows because the act of doing so is pleasurable in and of itself. 4 Thinkers from other disciplines have other theories. For example, economist Richard Easterlin of the University of Southern California has suggested that this paradox can be explained by the interaction between human nature and rising personal income. 5 Over the course off their adult lives, Easterlin notes, most people acquire more money and material goods. That s a big part of the reason they expect tomorrow to be better than today (and rate today better than yesterday). However, as people get more, they also want more and so they never achieve the increased level of satisfaction that they thought they would. This is a neither a new insight nor a new dilemma. Back in 1776, long before survey researchers started asking their questions, writer Samuel Johnson observed: Life is a progress from want to want, not from enjoyment to enjoyment. 4 Gilbert, Daniel. 2006. Stumbling on Happiness. New York: Knopf. 5 Easterlin, Richard A. 2002. The Income-Happiness Relationship. In Wolfgang Glatzer, ed., Rich and Poor: Disparities, Perceptions, Concomitants. Boston: Kluwer Academic. pp. 157-175.

6 About the Pew Social Trends Reports The Pew social trends reports explore the behaviors and attitudes of Americans in key realms of their lives family, community, health, finance, work and leisure. Reports analyze changes over time in social behaviors and probe for differences and similarities between key sub-groups in the population. The surveys are conducted by the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan fact tank that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Survey reports are the result of the collaborative effort of the social trends staff, which consists of: Paul Taylor, Executive Vice President Cary Funk, Senior Project Director Peyton Craighill, Project Director About the Survey Results for this survey are based on telephone interviews conducted with a nationally representative sample of adults, ages 18 years and older, living in continental U.S. telephone households. The sample design included a representative sample of 1,182 respondents and an oversample of 821 respondents ages 18 to 64. The data are weighted to produce a final sample that is representative of the general population of adults in the continental United States. Interviews conducted June 20-July 16, 2006 2,003 interviews Margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.5 percentage points for results based on the total sample at the 95% confidence level. The margin of sampling error is higher for results based on subgroups of respondents. Survey interviews conducted under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias in the findings of opinion polls.

7 PEW SOCIAL TRENDS FINAL TOPLINE June 20 July 16, 2006 N=2003 Q.1 All in all, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way things are going in this country, today? Satisfied Dissatisfied Don t know/ Refused June 2006 33 60 7=100 May 2006 29 65 6=100 March 2006 32 63 5=100 January 2006 34 61 5=100 Late November 2005 34 59 7=100 Early October 2005 29 65 6=100 July 2005 35 58 7=100 Late May 2005 39 57 4=100 February 2005 38 56 6=100 January 2005 40 54 6=100 December 2004 39 54 7=100 Mid-October 2004 36 58 6=100 July 2004 38 55 7=100 May 2004 33 61 6=100 Late February 2004 39 55 6=100 Early January 2004 45 48 7=100 December 2003 44 47 9=100 October 2003 38 56 6=100 August 2003 40 53 7=100 April 2003 6 50 41 9=100 January 2003 44 50 6=100 November 2002 41 48 11=100 September 2002 7 41 55 4=100 Late August 2002 47 44 9=100 May 2002 44 44 12=100 March 2002 50 40 10=100 Late September 2001 57 34 9=100 Early September 2001 41 53 6=100 June 2001 43 52 5=100 March 2001 47 45 8=100 February 2001 46 43 11=100 January 2001 55 41 4=100 October 2000 (RVs) 54 39 7=100 September 2000 51 41 8=100 June 2000 47 45 8=100 April 2000 48 43 9=100 August 1999 56 39 5=100 6 Asked April 8, 2003 only; N=395 7 The September 2002 trend is from a Pew Global Attitudes Project survey, fielded August 19 to September 8, 2002 and released December 4, 2002.

8 Q.1 CONTINUED Don t know/ Satisfied Dissatisfied Refused January 1999 53 41 6=100 November 1998 46 44 10=100 Early September 1998 54 42 4=100 Late August 1998 55 41 4=100 Early August 1998 50 44 6=100 February 1998 59 37 4=100 January 1998 46 50 4=100 September 1997 45 49 6=100 August 1997 49 46 5=100 January 1997 38 58 4=100 July 1996 29 67 4=100 March 1996 28 70 2=100 October 1995 23 73 4=100 June 1995 73 2=100 April 1995 23 74 3=100 July 1994 24 73 3=100 March 1994 24 71 5=100 October 1993 22 73 5=100 September 1993 20 75 5=100 May 1993 22 71 7=100 January 1993 39 50 11=100 January 1992 28 68 4=100 November 1991 34 61 5=100 Late February 1991 (Gallup) 66 31 3=100 August 1990 47 48 5=100 May 1990 41 54 5=100 January 1989 45 50 5=100 September 1988 (RVs) 50 45 5=100 May 1988 41 54 5=100 January 1988 39 55 6=100

9 Q.2 Let s talk about the quality of your life. Imagine a ladder with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top. Suppose the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you; and the bottom, the worst possible life for you. On which step of the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time? You can name any number between 0 and 10. High (8-10) Medium (6-7) Low (0-5) Don t Know/ Refused Mean Rating On which step of the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time? 41 30 26 3=100 6.8 2005 Pew Global Attitudes 8 40 29 30 1=100 6.7 2002 Pew Global Attitudes 43 32 24 1=100 6.9 1999 43 31 1=100 6.9 1998 48 31 21 *=100 7.1 1997 47 31 22 *=100 7.0 1996 37 33 29 1=100 6.7 1989 31 35 34 *=100 6.4 1987 33 36 30 1=100 6.5 1985 Gallup 31 36 33 *=100 6.4 1979 Gallup 34 31 33 2=100 6.5 1976 Gallup 38 30 32 *=100 6.7 1974 Gallup 36 28 36 *=100 6.4 1972 Gallup 34 28 38 *=100 6.4 1971 Gallup 34 30 34 2=100 6.5 1964 Gallup 36 33 30 1=100 6.7 8 The trends from 2005 and 2002 are from Pew Global Attitudes surveys. The question was worded Here is a ladder representing the ladder of life. Let s suppose the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you; and the bottom, the worst possible life for you. On which step of the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time?

10 Q.3 And on which step would you say you stood five years ago? Zero is the worst possible life and 10 the best possible life. High (8-10) Medium (6-7) Low (0-5) Don t Know/ Refused Mean Rating And on which step would you say you stood five years ago? 31 26 40 3=100 6.1 2005 Pew Global Attitudes 31 26 41 2=100 6.1 2002 Pew Global Attitudes 32 23 43 2=100 6.1 1999 27 23 49 1=100 5.7 1998 29 23 48 *=100 5.9 1997 28 46 1=100 5.9 1996 26 27 46 1=100 5.8 1989 28 27 44 1=100 6.0 1987 28 26 45 1=100 5.8 1985 Gallup 27 48 *=100 5.7 1979 Gallup 28 24 48 *=100 5.8 1976 Gallup 29 22 49 *=100 5.7 1974 Gallup 24 22 54 *=100 5.4 1972 Gallup 24 23 53 *=100 5.5 1971 Gallup 27 47 1=100 5.8 1964 Gallup 28 24 47 1=100 5.8 Q.4 And on what number step do you think you will be five years from now? Zero is the worst possible life and 10 is the best possible life. High (8-10) Medium (6-7) Low (0-5) Don t Know/ Refused Mean Rating And on what number step do you think you will be five years from now? 60 13 14 13=100 7.8 2005 Pew Global Attitudes 59 14 17 10=100 7.7 2002 Pew Global Attitudes 71 10 11 8=100 8.3 1999 69 14 10 7=100 8.2 1998 72 14 11 3=100 8.2 1997 73 13 10 4=100 8.2 1996 64 16 16 4=100 7.7 1989 56 21 18 5=100 7.4 1987 61 19 14 6=100 7.7 1985 Gallup 59 19 16 6=100 7.6 1979 Gallup 57 18 19 6=100 7.5 1976 Gallup 60 18 14 8=100 7.7 1974 Gallup 55 18 18 9=100 7.4 1972 Gallup 58 17 16 9=100 7.6 1971 Gallup 52 18 16 14=100 7.5 1964 Gallup 57 22 11 10=100 7.8

11 COMPARING PRESENT TO FUTURE LIFE (Q.2 AND Q.4) Ratings of your future life compared with the present. Future life will be -- Future life will be the SAME as present -- Future life will be Don t BETTER than present Present is positive Present is negative WORSE than present Know 2006 49 21 4 12 14=100 2005 49 24 4 12 11=100 2002 61 20 3 7 9=100 1999 60 21 3 8 8=100 1998 58 26 3 10 3=100 1997 59 3 9 4=100 1996 55 22 5 13 5=100 1989 55 20 5 15 5=100 1987 59 20 4 11 6=100 1985 Gallup 57 19 5 12 7=100 1979 Gallup 52 20 6 15 7=100 1976 Gallup 52 4 11 8=100 1964 Gallup 51 5 7 12=100 COMPARING PRESENT TO PAST LIFE (Q.2 AND Q.3) Ratings of your past life compared with the present. Present life is --- Present life is the SAME as the past --- Present life is Don t BETTER than the past Present is positive Present is negative WORSE than the past Know 2006 48 21 6 21 4=100 2005 48 19 6 2=100 2002 51 20 5 21 3=100 1999 56 20 8 15 1=100 1998 56 21 6 16 1=100 1997 57 21 5 16 1=100 1996 51 20 6 21 2=100 1989 47 18 8 26 1=100 1987 53 17 6 24 0=100 1985 Gallup 51 15 7 2=100 1979 Gallup 52 15 6 2=100 1976 Gallup 54 18 6 20 2=100 1964 Gallup 49 24 7 16 4=100 QUESTION 5 TO END IN PREVIOUS RELEASE OR HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE

12 Present Ratings by Political Groups and Church Attendance Percent rating their life today as high on the ladder of life (steps 8-10) All adults 41 Republicans Democrats Independents 34 36 56 Conservatives Moderates Liberals Attend church: Weekly or more Monthly or less Seldom or never 48 39 37 46 40 33 Present Ratings by Marital and Parenting Status Percent rating their life today as high on the ladder of life (steps 8-10) All adults 41 Married Not married 35 46 Have kids under 18 Have kids 18+ only Not a parent 38 37 46

13 Present Ratings by Local Unemployment Conditions Percent rating their life today as high on the ladder of life (steps 8-10) All adults 41 Unemployment in local area: Low Medium High 40 35 47 Note: Local unemployment conditions based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data of average 2005 unemployment in metropolitan or county areas. Present Ratings by Employment Situation Percent rating their life today as high on the ladder of life (steps 8-10) All adults 41 Employed, not retired 42 Not employed, not retired 31 Retired 45 Job satisfaction: Completely satisfied 57 Mostly satisfied 39 Mostly/completely dissatisfied 20 Note: Job satisfaction asked of all employed adults.

14 Present Ratings among Women Women s ratings of their life today on a scale from 0 to 10 on the ladder of life High All rating other Mean (8-10) ratings rating N % % All women 43 57=100 6.84 1069 Employment status Working women 46 54=100 7.00 621 Women, not working 40 60=100 6.66 444 Retired women 47 53=100 6.85 234 Other not working 32 68=100 6.45 209 Parenting status Have children under 18 38 62=100 6.67 414 No children under 18 46 54=100 6.95 650 Have children 18+ only 49 51=100 6.95 409 Not a mother 43 57=100 6.94 241 Parenting and Employment Status Working mothers 44 56=100 6.84 268 Working, no children under 18 49 51=100 7.11 351 Mothers, not working 29 71=100 6.39 145 Not working, no children under 18 45 55=100 6.78 297

15 Future Outlook by Employment Situation Comparing your present life with your future life Optmistic Life will be the same Pessimistic DK All adults 49 12 Employed, not retired 59 24 9 Not employed, not retired 57 16 8 Retired 21 34 21 Job satisfaction: Completely satisfied 56 30 8 Mostly satisfied 58 9 Mostly/completely dissatisfied 64 14 13 Note: Based on ratings of your life today compared with your life five years from now. Job satisfaction asked of all employed adults.

16 Comparison with Past by Demographic Groups Comparing your present life with your past life Made progress Same as past Slipped DK All adults 48 27 21 Men 49 26 21 Women 46 29 21 White 47 30 20 Black 44 21 28 Hispanic 51 20 18 18-29 58 20 18 30-49 56 22 18 50-64 42 30 27 65+ 44 22 College grad 56 24 18 Some college 49 29 21 HS grad or less 42 29 22 Family Income: $100K+ 59 14 $50K - $99K 58 17 $30K - $49K 46 26 Less than $30K 39 27 28 Republican 53 33 11 Democrat 45 24 26 Independent 49 23 Note: Based on ratings of your life today compared with your life five years ago. Whites and blacks include all non-hispanic. Hispanics are of any race.

17 Comparison with Past by Employment Situation Comparing your present life with your past life Made progress Same as past Slipped DK All adults 48 27 21 Employed, not retired 55 24 19 Not employed, not retired 49 22 23 Retired 29 41 23 Job satisfaction: Completely satisfied 57 28 13 Mostly satisfied 55 23 20 Mostly/completely dissatisfied 45 19 32 Note: Based on ratings of your life today compared with your life five years ago. Job satisfaction asked of all employed adults.