Risk Management for Cattle Feedlots: Futures Buy and Sell Signals

Similar documents
Risk Management for Cattle Feedlots: Futures Buy and Sell Signals

Risk Management for Pork Producers: Futures Buy and Sell Signals

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Futures and Options Live Cattle Feeder Cattle. Tim Petry Livestock Marketing Economist NDSU Extension

Futures and Options Live Cattle Feeder Cattle. Tim Petry Livestock Marketing Economist NDSU Extension Service

USING RISK MANAGEMENT TOOLS: A LIVESTOCK APPLICATION

Risk Management in Today s Cattle Business. J & F Oklahoma Holdings, Inc.

ECON 337 Agricultural Marketing Spring Exam I. Answer each of the following questions by circling True or False (2 point each).

Pricing Considerations Cattle Pricing and Risk Management

Managing Hog Price Risk: Futures, Options, and Packer Contracts

Four Types of Price Variation: Applications for Marketing and Risk Management

Introduction to Futures & Options Markets for Livestock

Business & Financial Services December 2017

Answer each of the following questions by circling True or False (2 points each).

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Technical Analysis: Alternatives To Chart Analysis

2013 Risk and Profit Conference Breakout Session Presenters. 4. Basics of Futures and Options: Part 1

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Agriculture & Natural Resources

Should I Buy Stocker Calves This Fall or a Fishing License?

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

Table of Contents. Introduction

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

LGM-Dairy: Livestock Gross Margin for Dairy

Regional overview Gisborne

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

Homework Assignment 2; Due February 8, 2018 (Beginning of Class)

1. (35 points) Assume a farmer derives utility from Income in the following manner

Regional overview Hawke's Bay

High Dividend Stocks In Rising Interest Rate Environments

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

Risk Management Programs for Forage and Livestock Producers. Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia

Livestock Risk Protection (LRP)

Illinois Job Index Note: BLS revised its estimates for the number of jobs and seasonal adjustment method at the beginning of 2010.

200 Years Of The U.S. Stock Market

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

ACE 427 Spring Lecture 6. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of January 31

Algo Trading System RTM

Historical Pricing PJM COMED, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Andrew P. Griffith Assistant Professor Livestock Extension Economist

Using Basis Information in a Hog Marketing Program

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

Beef Industry Risk Management: Alternatives and Resources for Producers

Notes on a California Perspective of the Dairy Margin Protection Program (DMPP)

FERC EL Settlement Agreement

Historical Pricing PJM PSEG, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Tim Petry Livestock Economist Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

Cattle Market And Controversy

CPA Australia Plan Your Own Enterprise Competition

Big Walnut Local School District

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

Regional overview Auckland

Fall 2017 Crop Outlook Webinar

Feeder Cattle Market Update AgriClear, All Rights Reserved.

Day 2 (Notice Day) Prior to open of trade, the clearinghouse matches the seller with the oldest long position and notifies both parties.

Average Local Bases fur An Aggregation of Cattle Markets in Ohio. Stephen Ott and E. Dean Baldwin. Introduction

Egg Entrepreneurship Records

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

Illinois Job Index. Growth Rate %

Risk Management for Stocker Cattle. R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D. Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia

Division of Bond Finance Interest Rate Calculations. Revenue Estimating Conference Interest Rates Used for Appropriations, including PECO Bond Rates

Development of Economy and Financial Markets of Kazakhstan

Indicators of the Kansas Economy

DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATION

Cost Estimation of a Manufacturing Company

Dairy Outlook and Utilizing MPP- and LGM-Dairy: Kenny Burdine University of Kentucky Agricultural Economics

Mean-Reversion in Dairy Prices and Horizon-Specific Subsidies for Dairy Insurance Products

1.2 The purpose of the Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to:

VIX Hedging September 30, 2015 Pravit Chintawongvanich, Head of Risk Strategy

Basis Data for Forward Pricing Feeder Cattle: Oregon-Washington; Shasta, California; Billings, Montana

Notes: 1. Prior corresponding period (pcp) 12 months to 31 March Statutory EBITDA represents Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) + tax expense +

Managed Futures: A Real Alternative

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

Revenue Estimating Conference Tobacco Tax and Surcharge Executive Summary

PHOENIX ENERGY MARKETING CONSULTANTS INC. HISTORICAL NATURAL GAS & CRUDE OIL PRICES UPDATED TO July, 2018

Constructing a Cash Flow Forecast

Factor Leave Accruals. Accruing Vacation and Sick Leave

Use of Futures and Options in a Retained Ownership Program

THE BASIS FOR FED CATTLE AND FEEDER CATTLE IN OHIO, July June Carl Zulauf Brian Watkins Carl Zimmerman* February 1983

MONTHLY MILK & FEED MARKET UPDATE

Department of Public Welfare (DPW)

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

The Margin Protection Program for Dairy in the 2014 Farm Bill (AEC ) September 2014

Transparency in the U.S. Repo Market

MEDICAID FEDERAL SHARE OF MATCHING FUNDS

Performance Report October 2018

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS. Self-Study Guide to Hedging with Livestock Futures and Options

Monthly Labour Force Survey Statistics December 2018

Monthly Labour Force Survey Statistics November 2018

Security Analysis: Performance

of RBC Dominion Securities Your Money, Well Managed October, 2013 Professional Wealth Management Since 1901

General BI Subjects. The Adjustments Clause

QUESTION 2. QUESTION 3 Which one of the following is most indicative of a flexible short-term financial policy?

HEDGING WITH FUTURES. Understanding Price Risk

2014 Iowa Farm Business Management Career Development Event. INDIVIDUAL EXAM (150 pts.)

Interest Rates. Countrywide Building Society. Saving Data Sheet. Gross (% per annum)

1: Product Profitability Analysis - Exercise

Transcription:

Risk Management for Cattle Feedlots: Futures Buy and Sell Signals John Lawrence and Sam Behrens 1 Iowa State University In recent years, the narrow feeding margin in cattle feeding has increased the need for effective risk management. Live Cattle futures is a tool for managing price risk that has been available since the mid- 1960s, but has seldom been used by Iowa cattle feeders. Producers often charge that futures are too complicated to use, listing margin calls and lack of profit potential as faults of this tool. Because futures markets are very efficient, it is impractical to believe that there is a simple, but profitable strategy that will work every time. However, there are strategies that can narrow the wide array of marketing choices into a more manageable set of choices to evaluate. In a separate paper, Live Cattle Futures and Options, How Have They Done, alternative marketing tools for cattle feeders are evaluated over a 10-year period. The evaluation examined the percentage of time that futures and options strategies achieved breakeven plus or minus a fixed amount. The analysis in that paper assumed that the producer made one decision at the start of the feeding period, i.e., when the cattle go into the feedlot, and that he/she held that market position until the cattle were sold six months later. This simplified analysis allowed alternative strategies to be compared fairly. In reality, a producer can make marketing decisions any day that the market is open. The decision then becomes one of market timing when to buy or sell a futures contract to reduce price risk or increase the net price received. This paper will evaluate alternative market timing decision rules more specifically, moving average (MA) strategies to determine when to enter or exit the futures market. Following a brief description of moving average procedures is a comparison of 42 different MA combinations over 10 years of data and two time horizons. Market timing signals As mentioned earlier, the futures market very quickly adjusts to information. It is nearly impossible for a trading strategy to remain successful for very long. Traders begin to use the information to make buy and sell decisions. As more people use the information, the results become more diluted. Market timing and technical trading rules are no different. These trading decisions are often simple enough to be programmed into a computer and are automatically exercised if the trading rule is triggered. While 1 Extension Livestock Economist and Associate Professor, and Undergraduate Research Assistant, Iowa State University Department of Economics

technical trading rules like MA may not be able to beat the market consistently, they do indicate market trends and a directional change in the trends. A moving average is a simple average of closing futures prices over a given period of time, i.e., five days. A new MA can be calculated by removing the oldest price and adding the newest price to the average. Moving average trading rules involve a short-term MA (e.g., 5 days) and a long-term MA (e.g., 20 days). The MA numbers can be plotted on a graph (Figure 1). The short-term MA will change direction more quickly than the long-term MA. Yet, the short-term MA still averages several days together to remove the day-to-day market noise. A change in market direction is signaled when the short-term crosses the long-term MA. For example, if the short-term MA crosses the long-term from below it signals an upturn in the price trend. If the short-term MA crosses from above, it signals a downturn in the trend. $82 $80 December 2000 Live Cattle Futures Closing Price and 5 and 20 Day Moving Average Close 5-day 20-day $78 $76 $74 $72 $70 $68 6/1 6/29 7/27 8/24 9/21 10/19 11/16 12/14 Figure 1. The combination of short-term and long-term MAs acts as a filter for market signals and determines how quickly one reacts to those signals. The trade-off is that the fewer the days included in the MA, the more often the market will trigger a trade, and the more often a commission is paid. The more days included in the MA, the fewer the number of trades will be signaled. There will be fewer

trades, but there may also be missed opportunities. Which combination of short-term and long-term MAs is most profitable and least risky? That is the focus of this analysis and report. Procedures Daily futures prices for the Live Cattle futures contracts were examined using 120 months of sales data from 1989-1998. All six contract months were used and evaluated for a producer who was selling fed cattle on or near the 15th of each month after they had been on feed either six months (yearlings) or ten months (light weight calves). Cost of production for the producer was assumed to be equal to that shown by the Iowa State University Extension Estimated Livestock Returns for the appropriate marketing month. A total of 42 different short-term long-term combinations were considered in the analysis for a short hedger. Table 1 summarizes the results; the full results can be found at http://www.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/lawrence/acrobat/cattleaveragelink.pdf. Results from alternative moving average futures strategies Table 1 ranks the strategies by hedging returns (combined cash and futures) and lists the five most profitable MA combinations by selling month for the time period evaluated, and shows the average return ($/cwt) for a hedger following the strategy. It also lists a risk ranking for each strategy. The 25th percentile cutoff is the measure of risk used and is defined as the 10-year average return at the 25th percentile. That is, 25 percent of the time, returns were less than this number; 75 percent of the time, returns were greater than this number. Producers can thus decide if they can risk a 1 in 4 chance of a lower return. The risk ranking lists the 25th percentile value for each strategy from highest to lowest. A higher 25th percentile value has a higher and more preferred risk ranking. Although somewhat arbitrary, Table 1 lists the five most profitable strategies and their risk ranking out of the 42 combinations. A good strategy is one that has a high average return and low risk (a 1 or 2 on both scales). For example, with May marketings over a 6-month hedging period, the #1 ranked average return was ranked #23 on risk, the 15-42 day combination. However, the #2 strategy in returns was #1 on risk (15-24 day combination), suggesting that giving up a small amount of average return was accompanied by a less risky strategy. Note that no single strategy is the best in every month; some work better than others in certain months. In some months the cash market compared well to the futures strategies, but was less favorable in other months. Also, there is very little difference in the average returns of the top five strategies in some cases.

How to read the table Selling Date Month in which you will be selling your cattle. Average Hedge Ranking Ranks the average return from hedging over ten years. A #1 ranking means that that strategy returned the highest average hedge return over ten years out of 42 strategies. Strategy The combination of short-term and long-term moving average ranked in the top five according to average net hedge. Average Net Hedge Gives the average hedging return ($/cwt live weight) dollar amount that was gained or lost if you had used that strategy over ten years. Risk Ranking Returns the ranking according to 25th percentile. That is, returns were less than this number 25 percent of the time, and greater than this number 75 percent of the time. A ranking of #1 means that, out of 42 strategies, that strategy was the least risky. 25th Percentile Gives the return that resulted 25% of the time. In other words, 75% of the time you will receive a higher return than the number listed. How to use this table 1. Determine if hedging with futures is appropriate for the operation and the time period considered. The report Live Cattle Futures and Options, How Have They Done compares futures contracts to alternative options strategies by profit objectives and selling month. 2. Locate the month in the selling date column in which you will be selling your cattle. 3. Consider either a 6-month or a 10-month time frame to match your feeding period. 4. Locate the results. For example, if you plan on selling your fed cattle in September after a 6-month feeding period, you have a couple of options. The 15-36 day strategy ranks first in average hedge return, but second in risk. The 18-30 strategy ranks second in average hedge return, but first in risk. Both strategies fared better than staying in the cash market.

Live Cattle Futures Results From Alternative Hedging Strategies For Years 1989-1998. 6-Month Hedges 10-Month Hedges Selling Hedge Avg. Net Risk 25% Hedge Avg. Net Risk 25% Date Ranking Strategy Hedge Ranking* Percentile Ranking Strategy Hedge Ranking* Percentile February Contracts Jan. 15 1 18-30 day 0.78 9-3.15 1 18-50 day -0.16 11-3.56 2 12-48 day 0.69 17-3.54 2 12-48 day -0.30 5-3.11 3 15-48 day 0.66 15-3.51 3 18-30 day -0.32 19-4.42 4 12-50 day 0.64 20-3.73 4 15-48 day -0.33 4-3.01 5 18-48 day 0.53 7-3.03 5 18-48 day -0.35 2-2.78 Cash only 1.57-2.27 Feb. 15 1 12-50 day 1.98 2-1.54 1 3-30 day 2.08 8-1.96 2 15-48 day 1.94 8-1.76 2 3-24 day 1.95 7-1.91 3 18-48 day 1.88 9-1.90 3 3-21 day 1.42 1-0.85 4 18-50 day 1.87 10-1.90 4 3-12 day 1.25 2-1.47 5 15-50 day 1.78 3-1.54 5 18-50 day 0.82 5-1.61 Cash only 2.19-2.09 April Contracts Mar. 15 1 18-42 day 3.50 3 0.44 1 18-48 day 4.03 1 0.56 2 12-42 day 3.18 9-0.12 2 18-42 day 4.00 6 0.02 3 18-48 day 3.16 4 0.44 3 18-50 day 3.76 3 0.39 4 9-42 day 3.03 11-0.22 4 15-50 day 3.55 4 0.29 5 15-42 day 2.97 7-0.03 5 15-42 day 3.51 8-0.19 Cash Only 3.45-0.57 Apr. 15 1 18-42 day 4.52 7-1.22 1 18-48 day 3.94 2 1.55 2 15-42 day 4.19 8-1.41 2 18-42 day 3.93 4 0.94 3 15-50 day 4.17 5-1.10 3 15-50 day 3.56 3 1.24 4 18-48 day 4.17 10-1.47 4 15-42 day 3.48 5 0.70 5 15-48 day 4.05 11-1.51 5 15-48 day 3.34 1 1.58 Cash only 2.72-0.35 June Contracts May 15 1 15-42 day 3.63 23-1.24 1 15-24 day 3.06 3 0.39 2 15-24 day 3.61 1 1.47 2 15-42 day 3.00 25-2.32 3 18-42 day 3.56 22-1.14 3 18-42 day 2.98 20-1.44 4 15-27 day 3.36 2 1.47 4 15-27 day 2.93 1 0.81 5 18-48 day 3.21 21-1.14 5 15-30 day 2.88 11-0.66 Cash only 1.38-3.36 Jun. 15 1 15-42 day 2.90 10-0.07 1 15-24 day 2.13 10-1.16 2 18-42 day 2.82 6 0.03 2 18-42 day 2.10 1-0.12 3 15-24 day 2.57 3 0.06 3 15-42 day 1.89 12-1.17 4 18-48 day 2.54 12-0.28 4 18-36 day 1.87 7-0.88 5 15-27 day 2.33 5 0.06 5 15-27 day 1.72 4-0.33 Cash only 0.20-1.65

Live Cattle Futures Results From Alternative Hedging Strategies For Years 1989-1998. 6-Month Hedges 10-Month Hedges Selling Hedge Avg. Net Risk 25% Hedge Avg. Net Risk 25% Date Ranking Strategy Hedge Ranking* Percentile Ranking Strategy Hedge Ranking* Percentile August Contracts Jul. 15 1 12-24 day 0.64 3-1.19 1 18-30 day 0.19 20-3.42 2 12-36 day 0.63 1-0.57 2 12-24 day 0.16 6-2.56 3 15-36 day 0.62 7-1.42 3 12-36 day -0.09 1-1.93 4 15-27 day 0.33 18-2.52 4 12-30 day -0.12 4-2.32 5 12-30 day 0.32 5-1.34 5 12-27 day -0.18 11-2.92 Cash only -0.99-3.45 Aug. 15 1 18-27 day -0.41 3-4.46 1 18-30 day -0.41 2-4.20 2 18-30 day -0.43 2-4.20 2 18-24 day -0.95 3-4.61 3 18-24 day -0.79 1-3.06 3 12-24 day -1.33 5-5.06 4 12-36 day -1.05 19-6.50 4 12-30 day -1.41 21-7.29 5 12-24 day -1.13 5-5.58 5 12-27 day -1.47 7-5.95 Cash only -6.90-4.83 October Contracts Sep. 15 1 15-36 day 0.20 1-0.87 1 15-36 day 0.15 1-0.89 2 18-30 day -0.10 2-1.18 2 15-42 day -0.23 2-1.84 3 15-42 day -0.10 3-1.85 3 18-30 day -0.36 3-2.24 4 18-27 day -0.31 12-3.59 4 18-36 day -0.67 11-3.94 5 18-36 day -0.36 16-3.95 5 18-42 day -0.78 5-3.20 Cash only -0.78-4.78 Oct. 15 1 3-30 day -0.57 8-4.57 1 18-30 day -0.35 1-1.90 2 5-24 day -0.69 21-5.61 2 15-42 day -0.69 4-3.05 3 5-30 day -0.72 27-6.03 3 18-36 day -0.77 6-3.60 4 5-36 day -0.76 15-5.15 4 15-36 day -0.87 3-2.62 5 15-36 day -0.91 2-2.87 5 18-27 day -0.89 2-1.92 Cash Only -0.65-4.73 December Contracts Nov. 15 1 18-27 day -0.46 8-4.77 1 18-27 day 0.50 1-1.73 2 15-36 day -0.54 13-5.27 2 18-30 day 0.08 2-1.93 3 18-36 day -0.59 1-3.74 3 12-36 day -0.09 12-3.09 4 15-30 day -0.64 15-5.34 4 12-42 day -0.12 10-2.88 5 18-30 day -0.69 14-5.28 5 12-24 day -0.28 3-2.05 Cash only -0.08-4.16 Dec. 15 1 15-27 day 0.30 11-5.72 1 12-42 day -0.99 24-6.81 2 15-30 day -0.23 9-5.65 2 18-27 day -1.05 15-5.96 3 12-42 day -0.35 20-6.18 3 15-42 day -1.30 19-6.23 4 15-36 day -0.37 8-5.63 4 12-36 day -1.34 17-6.16 5 15-42 day -0.53 13-5.83 5 15-36 day -1.52 20-6.32 Cash only -0.44-4.33 *42 different moving average day combinations