Research Accounting & Analysis Grant & Contract Accounting? Management Accounting & Analysis

Similar documents
Research Accounting & Analysis University of Washington

Research Accounting & Analysis University of Washington Operational Performance Dashboard

Business & Financial Services December 2017

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

Assessment Method 1: Evaluate users' training needs.

Operational Performance Dashboard March 2010 FY 2010 Quarter 3 (January - March 2010) Final

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

Operational Performance Dashboard March 2012 FY 2012 Quarter 3 (Jan - March 2012)

The Financial Reporting Checklists Every Firm should be Doing

Operational Performance Dashboard December 2010 FY 2011 Quarter 2 (Oct - Dec 2010) Final

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

FY2019 MEIF / Auxiliary Services / E&G Budget Discussion

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) FY16 Award Transition to Payment Management System (PMS) Subaccounts

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

FY BUDGET PROCESS APPENDIX #1 OPERATING BUDGET IMPROVEMENT TARGET MEASUREMENT UC BERKELEY BUDGET GUIDELINES AND ASSUMPTIONS

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending November 30, To FCC Contract Oversight Sub Committee

Performance Report October 2018

Looking at a Variety of Municipal Valuation Metrics

1.2 The purpose of the Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to:

Affordable Care Act Implementation Alert

EMPLOYER MUNICIPAL QUARTERLY WITHHOLDING BOOKLET

Big Walnut Local School District

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending April 30, To FCC Contract Oversight Sub Committee

Historical Pricing PJM COMED, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: FINANCIAL REPORT 03/31/2013

Big Walnut Local School District

Asset Manager Performance Comparison

University of Washington Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap - Executive Summary

Asset Manager Performance Comparison

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Russell 2000 Index Options

Sample Charter Financial Month End Report. May 31, 20XX

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending September 30, To NANC

Chapter 6. Solution: Austin Electronics. State of Economy Sales Probability

Historical Pricing PJM PSEG, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17 AT 11:30 AM

Division of Bond Finance Interest Rate Calculations. Revenue Estimating Conference Interest Rates Used for Appropriations, including PECO Bond Rates

London Borough of Barnet Pension Fund. Communication Strategy (2018)

Conflict of Interest Updates: Policy, Travel (PHS) and Rolling disclosures. OSP Forum August 20,

Economic and Travel Indicator

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending January 31, To NANC

Economic and Travel Indicator

Budget Manager Meeting. February 20, 2018

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending April 30, To NANC

Budget Presentation. Chemeketa Community College April 12, 2017

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY BUDGET PRIMER

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending January 31, To B&C Working Group

Factor Leave Accruals. Accruing Vacation and Sick Leave

FY19 BUDGET TIMETABLE

PI WORKCENTER REFERENCE GUIDE

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE

ONTARIO-MICHIGAN BORDER TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP Planning/Need and Feasibility Study. 1. Work Accomplished This Period (4 Weeks)

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending August 31, 2016 To B&C Working Group September 15, 2016

Using projections to manage your programs

Fiscal Year 2018 Project 1 Annual Budget

Ch. 13 Practice Questions Solution

Integrated Resource Planning Process University of Wisconsin-Parkside June 21, 2012

Unrestricted Cash / Board Designated Cash & Investments December 2015

Atlanta Public Schools Board of Education Budget Commission. September 20, 2018

PHOENIX ENERGY MARKETING CONSULTANTS INC. HISTORICAL NATURAL GAS & CRUDE OIL PRICES UPDATED TO July, 2018

Approve Financial Stability Plan (aka Project FIT) for UW Medicine

MEDICAID FEDERAL SHARE OF MATCHING FUNDS

Development of Economy and Financial Markets of Kazakhstan

HRAs and Health Care Reform Fees... The Patient- Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

DECEMBER KPI REPORT. Service Provider SLA Performance Core and Non-Core Settlement Systems Core and Non-Core BSC Systems. Supplier Performance

Power Accountants Association Annual Meeting Potential Impacts from Oct 2015 Rate Change

Work Program Integration Initiative (WPII)

Exam 1 Problem Solving Questions Review

Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waiver Monthly Surplus-Deficit Report for Waiver Program Expenditures. June 20, 2016

Economic and Travel Indicator

Planning and Control for the Non-Financial Manager

Making the Numbers Work

Regional overview Gisborne

STAFF REPORT Corporate Services

METRO. Monthly Board Report. June 2006

Dashboards Tools May 14 & 15, 2013 NonProfit Learning Center Discussion Leader: Kay Sohl

Effective Budgeting and Cost Control. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

Japan Securities Finance Co.,Ltd

Economic and Travel Indicator

Budget Retreat Financial Status. Presented to Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners February 20, 2014

QUESTION 2. QUESTION 3 Which one of the following is most indicative of a flexible short-term financial policy?

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: FINANCIAL REPORT 09/30/2018

Economic and Travel Indicator

CPA Australia Plan Your Own Enterprise Competition

Initiative of National Department of Health to accelerate Health Infrastructure Service Delivery

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: FINANCIAL REPORT 06/30/2017

BOARD OF TRUSTEES YEARLY CALENDAR

MANAGING FOR RESULTS: An Implementation Plan for the City of Portland

The ABCP Market. For the IMF Conference on Operationalizing Systemic Risk Monitoring, May 27, 2010

Regional overview Hawke's Bay

Ohlone Community College District

Economic and Travel Indicator

Mechanics of Cash Flow Forecasting

SERVICE CENTER GUIDELINES

Integrated Planning and Budgeting

Transcription:

Research Accounting & Analysis Grant & Contract Accounting? Management Accounting & Analysis Operational Performance Dashboard for August 20 Quarter 3 FY 20 (April - June 20) Grant and Contract Accounting Mission As a professional accounting team, our mission is to provide support to the UW Research Community by proactively delivering consistent, accurate and timely financial products and services. We anticipate and creatively respond to the needs of our customers through collaboration and commitment to continuous improvement. Management Accounting and Analysis Mission Our mission is to craft a department that anticipates and is responsive to the costing and other informational needs of the campus community. Enhance services by collaboratively analyzing and developing data, methodologies, and policies to maximize flexibility for academic departments while complying with governmental regulations. Our key processes include: Reporting Invoicing Compliance Cash Management Recharge Accounting Oversight Develop and Negotiate Indirect Cost Rates (F&A) For questions about this report, contact Vincent Lau, Grant & Contract Accounting, vlau@u.washington.edu

Research Accounting and Analysis Page 2 of 20 University of Washington - 10/2/20

Customer Perspective Process Measure Research Accounting and Analysis Operational Performance Dashboard for Quarter 3 Fiscal Year (August 20) Financial Perspective Current Output Measure Target Gap (Target - Output) Process Measure Current Output Measure Target Gap (Target - Output) New Budgets 1) Average number of days from receipt of award in GCS to notification of budget number received by Principal Investigator from GCA. * 1. (Aug ) 13.0 1. Billing 11) Unbilled cost reimbursable expenditures as a percentage of monthly cost reimbursable expenditures.* 78. (Aug ) 30. 8. Customer Satisfaction 2) Customer Satisfaction Survey (measured in ref. to a possible.0 average for all areas surveyed); next survey results due in mid 20 3.0 (1999) 3.2 0.2 Aged Receivables 12) Percent of aged receivables outstanding more than 10 days overdue. 19.% (Aug ) 1..% RTEs 3) Number of days to process Request to Transfer Expenditures (RTEs) submitted by departments to GCA. 3.9 (Aug ).0 No gap DHHS 13) Potential liability from DHHS Awards that are closing in the next 3 years. $2.8 M (Qtr-) $.0 M $19.8 M Closings ) Percent of budgets expired more than 10 days and not closed. 23.% (Aug ) 20. 3.% F&A Indirect Cost 1) Percent of dollar increase from year to year (fiscal) for indirect-cost recovery * 9.7% (rolling -year average). No gap Recharge Centers ) Percent of submitted recharge that MAA has approved See Graph See Graph See Graph Web Pages ) Percent of all Management Accounting and Analysis (MAA) WEB pages, links and major revisions completed Internal Business Process Perspective Process Measure 7. (Qtr-) Current Output Measure 90. by June 0 Target 23. Gap (Target - Output) Learning and Growth Perspective Process Measure Current Output Measure Target Gap (Target - Output) Cash Applied 7) Percent of cash applied to budgets. 100. (Qtr-) 97. No gap EDPs 1) % Of staff with active EDPs % (Qtr-). FSRs 8) Percent of final (and interim) Financial Status Reports (FSRs) completed within 90 days of budget expiration..7% (Aug ) 8. 19.3% Employee Satisfaction 1) Employee Satisfaction (next survey in 20); points possible:.0 3.7 (Last done in 2000).00 0.2 FECs 9) Faculty Effort Certificates (FECs) overdue. Qtr- available in mid-october 200 3.% (Qtr3-) 3. 0.% Cost- Share 10) % Of budgets expired more than 90 days with unmet cost sharing. * (UNDER REVIEW) * Measure is on FM Dashboard. Rolling 12-month average; all days are calendar days 33.3% (June ) 20. 13.3% Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 3 of 20

Output Measure #1 New Budgets Number of Days from Receipt of Award to PI Notification (12 Month Rolling Average = 1. Days) Number of Calendar Days 2 20 1 10 0 13 1 10 18 1 12 8 12 8 9 17 9 21 1 1 1 1 1 13 19 1 Target = 13 Days Avg. Number of Days in New Account Setup Process - Award through PI Notification Number of Calendar Days 1 1 12 10 8 2 0 9 7 7 12 9 7 3 2 7 2 3 3 10 1 2 3 3 7 10 3 1 10 10 9 9 7 8 3 3 9 1 9 Award - Nea (GCS) NEA - PI Notify (GCA) Target = 3 days from NEA to PI notification by GCA NEA = Notice to Establish Account. The NEA is sent by Grant & Contract Services to the New Accounts section of GCA. Note: Data relates to grants only, since July 20 Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page of 20

Output Measure #2 Customer Satisfaction 1999 Customer Satisfaction Survey.00 3.0 3.00 3.13 2.8 3.0 2.0 2.00 1.0 1.00 0.0 0.00 Accuracy Timeliness Professionalism Target = 3.2 for 20 Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page of 20

Output Measure #3 Request to Transfer Expenditures (RTEs) Number of Calendar Days 9 8 7 3 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 7 Number of Days to Process RTEs (12 Month Rolling Average = 3.9 Days) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Target = Days 8 2 1 8 3 2 Total Number of RTEs per Month 800 00 00 331 3 23 82 37 37 09 19 72 29 3 1 37 81 3 98 9 97 0 3 8 727 20 200 0 Note: Materiality level changed from $0 to $20 for total deficits or total cash in March 20. Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page of 20

Output Measure # Closings 8 Percent of Budgets Expired More Than 10 Days and Not Closed (12 Month Rolling Average = 23.%) 2 18% 1% 1% 22% 23% 29% 29% 23% 27% 2% 2% 2% 23% Non-Letter of Credit Interim & Final Combined Letter of Credit Interim & Final Combined Combined Combined Target = 2 2000 100 1000 101 Number of Budgets Expired More Than 10 Days and Not Closed 1730 1719 111 17 18 10 1292 1339 1381 99 88 137 00 0 Non-Letter of Credit Interim & Final Combined Letter of Credit Interim & Final Combined Combined Target = 120 Budgets Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 7 of 20

Output Measure # Recharge Centers 120 100 Average Number of Days from Rate Submission to Approval for Recharge Center Proposals (July 20 - June 20) 98 Number of Calendar Days 80 0 0 82 Target = 2 1 Target = Target = 73 20 20 Target = 17 0 1-2 3- -20 >20 (17 Proposals) (1 Proposals) (1 Proposals) (7 Proposals) Number of Rates Avg # of Days Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 8 of 20

Output Measure # Web Pages Percent of All Web Pages, Links and Major Revisions Completed 10 9 100 90 Percentage Complete 8 7 3 2 1 1% 2 % 19% 8 % 22 % 22 3% 29 3% 29 % 3 7% 3 80 70 0 0 0 30 20 10 0 Number of Pages Qtr - Qtr 1- Qtr 2- Qtr 3- Qtr - Qtr 1- Qtr 2- Qtr 3- Qtr - Number of Web Pages Completed Percentage of Web Pages Completed Target = 9 of Web Pages Completed by End of 200 Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 9 of 20

Output Measure #7 Cash Applied 10 Percent Of Cash Applied to Budgets 10 10 10 10 99% 99% 98% 98% 9% 98% 9% 9% 9% 91% 99% 9 Checks amount % applied EFT amount % applied LOCs amount % applied Target = 97% 10 98% 9% 9% 92% 9 99% Percent of Total Cash Received in Quarter That is Applied By End of 1st Month Following End of Quarter 99% 99% Target = 97% 98% 10 Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 10 of 20

Output Measure #8 Financial Status Reports (FSRs) 10 8 2 31% 21% % 7% Percent of Financial Status Reports Completed by Sponsor Due Date (12 Month Rolling Average =.7%) 9% 9% 8 % % 7% 8% 1% 7% % 9% % % 8% 8% % 7% 77% 89% Target = 8% Federal and Non-Federal FSRs Completed by Sponsor Due Date 10 8 2 Letter of Credit Interim & Final Combined Non-Letter of Credit Interim & Final Combined Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 11 of 20

Output Measure #9 Faculty Effort Certification (FECs) 9% 8% 8.2% Percent of FECs Overdue at End of Calendar Quarter (12 Month Rolling Average = 3.%) 7% % % % 3% 2% 1%.%.3%.2% 3.% 3.% 2.8% 1.7% 0.% 0.7% 0.% 0.% 0.7% 0.7% 0.% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Qtr 1 - Qtr 2- Qtr 3- Qtr - Qtr 1- Qtr 2- Qtr 3- % overdue Total % overdue over 2 Qtrs % overdue over Qtrs Target = % of Total FECs Overdue to 3. by 200 Target = % of FECs Overdue by 2 Qtrs to.% by 200 Note: Measurements for an academic quarter are not available until the end of the following quarter. Q- will be available at the end of Q1-0 (early October 20) Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 12 of 20

Output Measure #10 Cost Share Percent of Budgets 3% 3 2% 2 1% 1 % 23.% Budgets Requiring Cost Share with Unmet Cost Share 90 Days afer Expiration 7 33.3% % of Expired Budgets with Unmet Cost Share 90 Day after Expiration Number of Budgets with Unmet Cost Share 90 Days after Expiration Target = 2 8 7 3 2 1 0 Number of Budgets Number of Budgets 70 0 0 0 30 20 10 0 $3,792,8 Note: Cost share includes committed and mandatory. 38 Total Number of Expired Budgets with Unmet Cost Share and Total Dollar Amount of Unmet Cost Share,07,18 1 Total Number of Expired Budgets with Unmet Cost Share $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 13 of 20 $0 Total Dollar Amount of Unmet Cost Share

Output Measure #11 Billing Billing -- August 20 Expenditures Billed Difference (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Scheduled Payment Budgets $ 12. $ 209. $ 8.22 Scheduled Invoice Budgets $ 199.88 $ 2.0 $ 2.2 Cost Reimbursable and Fixed Price Budgets $ 329.71 $ 327.13 $ (2.8) Total $. $ 739.19 $ 8.1 Annual Lost Interest on Cost Reimbursable Expenditures Annual Lost Interest on Unbilled Portion: 12 month rolling average $ 9,08,33 % Unbilled Cost Reimbursable Expenditures -- Current Month $1,0,00 $00,00 $,28 Annual Lost Interest on Current Month Billing: (if accounts billed 10 days faster each month) $ 8,,132 $ % 11,21 $7,381,0 $0 Grand Total -- Lost Interest $ 9,89 Deficits Avg. Advance Other Billing Freq. Net Unbilled Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 1 of 20

Millions $1.0 $12.0 $10.0 $8.0 $.0 $.0 $2.0 $- Billable Cost Reimbursable Expenditures Not Billed $12.1$12.2 $12.0 $10.8 $9.9 $9.0 $7.7 $.3 $7.0 $7.1 $7.8 $8.8 $9.2 $9. $9.2 $7. $7. $.7 $.9 $.8 $. $. $7. $. $.9 Aug ' Sept ' Oct. ' Nov ' Dec ' Jan ' Feb ' Mar ' Apr ' May ' June ' July ' Aug ' Target = $2.3 million Sept ' Oct ' Nov ' Dec ' Jan ' Feb ' March ' Apr ' May ' June ' July ' Aug ' 20 1 10 Unbilled Cost Reimbursable Expenditures as a Percentage of Monthly Cost Reimbursable Expenditures* 173.1% 19.8% 18.% 13.8% 19.2% 12.% 128.1% 113.% 11.9% 107.9% 112.1% 113.1% 92. 79.1% 70.1% 9.% 72.7% 80.2%91.8% 7.3% 83.% 9.3% 78. 73.8% Sept ' Oct. ' Nov ' Dec ' Jan ' Feb ' Mar ' Apr ' May ' June ' July ' Aug ' Target = 3 Sept ' Oct ' Nov ' Dec ' Jan ' Feb ' March ' Apr ' May ' June ' July ' Aug ' * When result < 10, unbilled expenditures are less than total monthly expenditures (unbilled < current monthly expends). * When result > 10, unbilled expenditures are greater than total monthly expenditures (unbilled > current monthly expends). Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 1 of 20

Output Measure #12 Aged Receivables 10 9 8 7 3 2 1 Outstanding Aged Receivables Outstanding Aged Receivables (Rolling 12-month average) Over 10 Days 2% 91-10 days 11% 1-90 days % 1-90 days old 91-10 days old 11+ days Millions $10 $8 $ $ Outstanding Aged Receivables More Than 10 Days Old.7...1..7 7.1 7.9 7.7.2.3 3 2% 2 1% 1 Percent of Aged Receivables Outstanding More than 10 Days Old 2% 2% 21% 2 22% 23% 2 19% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% $2 $0 Target = $ million % Target = 1% Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 1 of 20

Output Measure #13 DHHS 3 2 3 Potential Liability from DHHS Awards that are Closing in the Next 3 Years (Potential Liability Expressed as a Percentage) 39% 32% 28% 29% 23% 1 1% 2% 2% 1% 0.9% 1.3% Qtr 3 Qtr Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr Percentage Based on Number of Budgets Percentage Based on Award Dollars Millions $30.0 $2.0 $20.0 $1.0 $10.0 $.0 $- $20.2 Potential Liability from DHHS Awards that are Closing in the Next 3 Years (Potential Liability Expressed in Dollars) $27. $2. 172 * 1970 * 211 * 132 * 1790 * 189 * Qtr 3 Qtr Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr $21.2 Target = $ Million $17.2 $2.8 A liability occurs when what the UW shows as the authorized amount for an award is greater than the award amount currently authorized by DHHS. Percentage based on number of budgets compares the number of budgets where there is a liability compared to the total number of DHHS budgets. Percentage based on award dollars compares the award dollars on budgets where there is a liability compared to the total award dollars for DHHS budgets. * Number of budgets where UW award differs from PMS award Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 17 of 20

Output Measure #1 F&A Indirect Cost $10 $10 $120 $100 $80 $0 $0 $20 $0 Percent of Dollar Increase from Year-to-Year for Indirect Cost Revenues (Rolling yr Average 9.7%) $8 $89 $91 $97 $109 199 199 1997 1998 1999 2000 20 20 20 $118 Target - % increase from previous year $12 $139 $13 Percent Needing Investigation 10 8 2 Buildings with Room Listing Not Complete for the F&A Rate Proposal by Percent Needing Investigation and Number of Incomplete Room Lists 20 300 20 18 170 200 121 128 113 89.3% 9 10 3.% 8.% 100 1.%. 38.8% 32.% 0 0 Dec 20 Jan 20 Feb 20 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 % of Buildings Needing Investigation # of Buildings With Incomplete Room Lists Number of Buildings With Incomplete Room Lists Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 18 of 20

Output Measure #1 EDPs Employee Development Plans (EDPs) 3% 8% % 3 3 31% 3% 32% 3% 3 2 1 Qtr Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr Target = Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 19 of 20

Output Measure #1 Employee Satisfaction.00 Employee Satisfaction Survey (Average 3.7 in 2000).00 3.80 3.8 3.92 3. 3.9 3.90 3.87 3.80 3.3 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Morale Performance Feedback Leadership Physical Work Environment Internal Process Partners Communication Teamwork Training External Process Partners Target.0 of possible.0 Research Accounting and Analysis University of Washington - 10/2/20 Page 20 of 20