Lecture 1: Empirical Properties of Returns

Similar documents
Statistical Analysis of Data from the Stock Markets. UiO-STK4510 Autumn 2015

Introduction to Computational Finance and Financial Econometrics Descriptive Statistics

Financial Risk Forecasting Chapter 1 Financial markets, prices and risk

Economics 483. Midterm Exam. 1. Consider the following monthly data for Microsoft stock over the period December 1995 through December 1996:

DazStat. Introduction. Installation. DazStat is an Excel add-in for Excel 2003 and Excel 2007.

Fin285a:Computer Simulations and Risk Assessment Section 3.2 Stylized facts of financial data Danielson,

Lecture 6: Non Normal Distributions

Quantitative Finance Conditional Heteroskedastic Models

Midterm Exam. b. What are the continuously compounded returns for the two stocks?

Chapter 4 Level of Volatility in the Indian Stock Market

Washington University Fall Economics 487. Project Proposal due Monday 10/22 Final Project due Monday 12/3

Supervisor, Prof. Ph.D. Moisă ALTĂR. MSc. Student, Octavian ALEXANDRU

Variance clustering. Two motivations, volatility clustering, and implied volatility

2018 AAPM: Normal and non normal distributions: Why understanding distributions are important when designing experiments and analyzing data

Example 1 of econometric analysis: the Market Model

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Washington University Fall Economics 487

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Graduate School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2008, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Homework Assignment #1

Random Effects ANOVA

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

Lecture 5a: ARCH Models

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Financial Time Series and Their Characteristics

Parametric Statistics: Exploring Assumptions.

GGraph. Males Only. Premium. Experience. GGraph. Gender. 1 0: R 2 Linear = : R 2 Linear = Page 1

Handout seminar 6, ECON4150

University of Zürich, Switzerland

Lecture Note: Analysis of Financial Time Series Spring 2008, Ruey S. Tsay. Seasonal Time Series: TS with periodic patterns and useful in

Occasional Paper. Risk Measurement Illiquidity Distortions. Jiaqi Chen and Michael L. Tindall

I. Return Calculations (20 pts, 4 points each)

Problem Set 4 Answer Key

Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2008: More Volatility Models. Mr. Ruey Tsay

Final Exam Suggested Solutions

Economics 424/Applied Mathematics 540. Final Exam Solutions

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Working Paper Series. WPS No. 797 March Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models

Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2017: More Volatility Models. Mr. Ruey Tsay

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Data Distributions and Normality

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

A Study of Stock Return Distributions of Leading Indian Bank s

Time series: Variance modelling

Random Walks vs Random Variables. The Random Walk Model. Simple rate of return to an asset is: Simple rate of return

Time series analysis on return of spot gold price

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Conditional Heteroscedasticity

Fitting parametric distributions using R: the fitdistrplus package

Descriptive Statistics for Financial Time Series

VOLATILITY. Time Varying Volatility

Forecasting Volatility of USD/MUR Exchange Rate using a GARCH (1,1) model with GED and Student s-t errors

1. Distinguish three missing data mechanisms:

STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY, NON-LINEARITY AND THIN TRADING EFFECTS IN SOME SELECTED COMPANIES IN GHANA

QQ Plots Stat 342, Spring 2014 Prof. Guttorp - TA Aaron Zimmerman

Are hedge fund returns predictable? Author. Published. Journal Title. Copyright Statement. Downloaded from. Link to published version

Financial Time Series and Volatility Prediction using NoVaS Transformations

Financial Econometrics (FinMetrics04) Time-series Statistics Concepts Exploratory Data Analysis Testing for Normality Empirical VaR

Financial Time Series Lecture 4: Univariate Volatility Models. Conditional Heteroscedastic Models

Exam 2 Spring 2015 Statistics for Applications 4/9/2015

Monetary Economics Measuring Asset Returns. Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Testing the Long-Memory Features in Return and Volatility of NSE Index

Weak Form Efficiency of Gold Prices in the Indian Market

Chapter 1. Descriptive Statistics for Financial Data. 1.1 UnivariateDescriptiveStatistics

Financial Econometrics

Empirical Asset Pricing for Tactical Asset Allocation

Two-Sample T-Test for Superiority by a Margin

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm 2014

Simple Descriptive Statistics

QQ PLOT Yunsi Wang, Tyler Steele, Eva Zhang Spring 2016

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

Two-Sample T-Test for Non-Inferiority

Business Statistics 41000: Probability 3

Properties of financail time series GARCH(p,q) models Risk premium and ARCH-M models Leverage effects and asymmetric GARCH models.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Graduate School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2003, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay

STAT Chapter 6: Sampling Distributions

Financial Data Analysis, WS08/09. Roman Liesenfeld, University of Kiel 1

Modeling Exchange Rate Volatility using APARCH Models

Estimating dynamic volatility of returns for Deutsche Bank

Two Way ANOVA in R Solutions

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Gloria Gonzalez-Rivera Forecasting For Economics and Business Solutions Manual

Valid Missing Total. N Percent N Percent N Percent , ,0% 0,0% 2 100,0% 1, ,0% 0,0% 2 100,0% 2, ,0% 0,0% 5 100,0%

Interrelationship between Profitability, Financial Leverage and Capital Structure of Textile Industry in India Dr. Ruchi Malhotra

Fat tails and 4th Moments: Practical Problems of Variance Estimation

EVA Tutorial #1 BLOCK MAXIMA APPROACH IN HYDROLOGIC/CLIMATE APPLICATIONS. Rick Katz

An Empirical Research on Chinese Stock Market Volatility Based. on Garch

Financial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford

Models Multivariate GARCH Models Updated: April

The suitability of Beta as a measure of market-related risks for alternative investment funds

Prerequisites for modeling price and return data series for the Bucharest Stock Exchange

Modelling catastrophic risk in international equity markets: An extreme value approach. JOHN COTTER University College Dublin

Spillover effect: A study for major capital markets and Romania capital market

Simulation of Extreme Events in the Presence of Spatial Dependence

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Model Construction & Forecast Based Portfolio Allocation:

Transcription:

Lecture 1: Empirical Properties of Returns Econ 589 Eric Zivot Spring 2011 Updated: March 29, 2011 Daily CC Returns on MSFT -0.3 r(t) -0.2-0.1 0.1 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1

Daily CC Returns on S&P 500-0.20 0 5-0.15-0.10-5 0 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Distribution of Daily CC Returns on MSFT Percent of Total 60 50 40 30 20 Daily CC Returns on MSFT Sample Quantiles: min 1Q median 3Q max -0.3583-1282 0 1554 0.1787 Sample Moments: mean std skewness kurtosis 01278 2539-0.7275 16.12 Number of Observations: 4365 10 0-0.3-0.2-0.1 0.1 0.2 x 2

Distribution of Daily CC Returns on S&P 500 Percent of Total 60 50 40 30 20 Daily CC Returns on S&P 500 Sample Quantiles: min 1Q median 3Q max -0.229-04697 004677 0581 8709 Sample Moments: mean std skewness kurtosis 003276 1135-2.083 45.18 Number of Observations: 4365 10 0-0.20-0.15-0.10-5 5 0.10 x Normal QQ-Plot Test for Normality 0.2 0.1-0.1 10/26/1987-0.2 Daily CC Returns on MSFT 10/19/2000 Test for Normality: Jarque-Bera Null Hypothesis: data is normally distributed MSFT Test Stat 31685.64 p.value 0 Dist. under Null: chi-square with 2 degrees of freedom Total Observ.: 4365-0.3 10/19/1987-2 0 2 3

QQ-Plot: Student-t with 4 degrees of freedom Daily CC Returns on MSFT 0.2 06/30/2003 0.1-0.1-0.2 03/17/1986-0.3 03/14/1986-10 -5 0 5 10 Skew Normal Distribution shape=5 shape=-5 pdf 0.2 0.4 0.6 pdf 0.2 0.4 0.6-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 shape=0 shape=1000 pdf 0.1 0.2 pdf 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 ξ = 0, ω = 1 4

Skew t Distribution shape=5 shape=-5 St St pdft 0.2 0.4 0.6 Sn pdft 0.2 0.4 0.6 Sn -4-2 0 2 4-4 -2 0 2 4 shape=0 shape=1000 pdft 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 St Sn pdft 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 St Sn -4-2 0 2 4-4 -2 0 2 4 ξ = 0, ω = 1, ν = 5 QQ-Plot: MLE of Skew-t for MSFT location = -04, scale = 20, shape = 0.298, df = 4.973 msft -0.3-0.2-0.1 0.1 0.2 mle computed with R package sn, qqplot() from R package car -0.1 0.1 0.2 st quantiles 5

Normal QQ-Plot Test for Normality 005 5 Daily CC Returns on S&P 500 10/21/1987 Test for Normality: Jarque-Bera Null Hypothesis: data is normally distributed -5 10/26/1987-0.10-0.15-0.20 SP500 Test Stat 326705.3 p.value Dist. under Null: chi-square with 2 degrees of freedom Total Observ.: 4365 10/19/1987-2 0 2 QQ-Plot: Student-t with 4 degrees of freedom 0.1 Daily CC Returns on S&P 500 06/30/2003-0.1 03/17/1986-0.2 03/14/1986-10 -5 0 5 10 6

QQ-Plot: MLE of Skew-t for SP500 location = 01, scale = 07, shape = -99, df = 3.329 sp500-0.10-5 0 5 0.10-0.20-0.15 - mle computed with R package sn, qqplot() from R package car -0.10-5 0 5 0.10 st quantiles Monthly CC Returns on MSFT r(t) -0.4-0.3 3-0.2-0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 7

Monthly CC Returns on S&P500-0.20-0.15-0.10-5 0 0..05 0.10 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Distribution for Monthly Returns on MSFT 30 Monthly CC Returns on MSFT Sample Quantiles: min 1Q median 3Q max -0.3861-3587 336 9736 0.4384 Percent of Total 20 Sample Moments: mean std skewness kurtosis 3357 0.1145 0.1845 4.004 Number of Observations: 208 10 0-0.4-0.2 0.2 0.4 x 8

Distribution for Monthly Returns on S&P 500 30 25 Monthly CC Returns on S&P500 Sample Quantiles: min 1Q median 3Q max -0.2066-1921 122 3875 0.125 Percent of Total 20 15 10 Sample Moments: mean std skewness kurtosis 08219 459-0.8377 5.186 Number of Observations: 208 5 0-0.2-0.1 0.1 x Normal QQ-Plot Tests for Normality 0.4 0.2-0.2 01/01/1987 01/01/2001 Test for Normality: Shapiro-Wilks MSFT Test Stat 0.9906 p.value 0.9558 Dist. under Null: normal Total Observ.: 208 Test for Normality: Jarque-Bera MSFT Test Stat 9.9223 p.value 070 04/01/2000-0.4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 Dist. under Null: chi-square with 2 degrees of freedom Total Observ.: 208 9

QQ-Plot: Student s t with 10 df 0.4 06/01/2003 05/01/2003 0.2-0.2 03/01/1986-0.4-2 0 2 Normal QQ-Plot Tests for Normality 0.1 Monthly CC Returns on S&P500 01/01/1987 Test for Normality: Shapiro-Wilks SP500 Test Stat 0.9699 p.value 154 Dist. under Null: normal Total Observ.: 208 Test for Normality: Jarque-Bera -0.1 08/01/1998-0.2 10/01/1987-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 SP500 Test Stat 65.7551 p.value 000 Dist. under Null: chi-square with 2 degrees of freedom Total Observ.: 208 10

QQ-Plot: Student s t with 7 df Monthly CC Returns on S&P500 0.1 06/01/2003-0.1 04/01/1986 03/01/1986-0.2-4 -2 0 2 4 Testing for Autocorrelation Test for Autocorrelation: Ljung-Box Daily CC Returns on MSFT Null Hypothesis: no autocorrelation.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.4 0 0 10 20 30 Daily CC Returns on S&P 500 0 10 20 30 SP500 Test Stat 35.1892 p.value 191 Dist. under Null: chi-square with 20 degrees of freedom Total Observ.: 4365 Test for Autocorrelation: Ljung-Box Null Hypothesis: no autocorrelation MSFT Test Stat 43.2323 p.value 019 Dist. under Null: chi-square with 20 degrees of freedom Total Observ.: 4365 11

Stylized Facts of Daily Asset Returns Microsoft Returns S & P 500 Returns 0.30 0.10-0 Microsoft Squared Returns S & P 500 Squared Returns -0 0.20 5 Volatility clustering 0 8 00 40 Microsoft Absolute Returns S & P 500 Absolute Returns 0 0.30 0 0.30 Sample Autocorrelations of Daily Returns Microsoft Returns S&P 500 Returns 0.6 0.6 Microsoft Squared Returns Dependence in volatility S&P 500 Squared Returns 0.6 0.6 Microsoft Absolute Returns Microsoft Absolute Returns 0.6 0.6 12

Stylized Facts for Monthly Asset Returns Microsoft Returns S&P 500 Returns -0.3 0.4-0.20 0.10 Microsoft Squared Returns Less volatility clustering S&P 500 Squared Returns 2 0.18 05 Microsoft Squared Returns Less volatility dependence S&P 500 Squared Returns 0.6 0.6 MSFT and S&P 500 Daily Returns SP500 0.1-0.2-0.1 Sample covariance matrix MSFT SP500 MSFT 006380948 001700987 SP500 001700987 001262902 MSFT Sample correlation matrix MSFT SP500 MSFT 1.0000000 0.5992023 SP500 0.5992023 1.0000000-0.3-0.2-0.1 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 13

EWMA Volatilities and Correlations EWMA Conditional Volatilities EWMA Conditional Correlation SP500 1 2 3 4 6 8 2 4 6 MSFT 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Correlations 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003 14