TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

Similar documents
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

$46,400,000 to be funded from gifts ($37,400,000) and external financing ($9,000,000)

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY

CHAIR OF THE BOARD CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

How to Participate in the Environmental Review Process. September 29, 2016

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM CONSENT

VICE PRESIDENT, BUDGET AND CAPITAL RESOURCES, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

UC MERCED CAPITAL PLANNING PROCESS CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Issued: February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of Contents...1

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE

5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Truckee Railyard Draft Master Plan EIR. Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendices A-B SCH No

A. Certify the UCLA Long Range Development Plan Amendment (2017) and Student Housing Projects Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of Completion of the DEIR that was filed by mail with the State Office of

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM

RECOMMENDATION. c. Approve a total project cost of $3,300,000

BOARD OF GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA Project Summary Florida International University Athletic Stadium Expansion, Phase I

UCR Campus Planning. Capital Asset Strategies REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ON-CALL NON-PROJECT SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES APRIL 2018

CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDELINES

CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 ACTION ITEM

RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on July 24, 2017 a Scoping Meeting was noticed and held pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083; and,

Addendum to Environmental Impact Report

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM

STAFF REPORT. Nishi Student Housing Application: Processing Directions

UCM DA 176. September 7, 2018 VICE CHANCELLOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

2.2 Negative Declaration Preparation of a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration

The Regents of the University of California. COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS COMMITTEE ON FINANCE January 14, 2004

The America s Cup in San Francisco

NOVATO GENERAL PLAN 2035 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

In accordance with authority previously delegated by the Regents, interim or concurrence action was taken on routine or emergency matters as follows:

Minutes Capital Planning and Budget Committee Thursday, August 23, 2012

Administrative Code Chapter 31 Amendments

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

2. Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), dated December Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, dated December 2007.

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Housing Authority D Successor Agency D Oversight Board D

JORDAN DOWNS SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Proposed Menlo Gateway Project Development Agreement Term Sheet

[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]

Introduction P O L I C Y D O C U M E N T P A R T 1

ACTION ITEM APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING, SANTA MONICA ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL LEGAL SETTLEMENT, LOS ANGELES CAMPUS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FY 2018 Capital Development Plan University of Arizona

1. I N T R O D U C T I O N

Approve a project to construct the Sports Performance Center

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

CEQA Checklist for School Districts

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 CMR: 346:06

One Gateway PI; Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA goulr-~y,~...-.

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

RESOLUTION NO

C. ESTIMATED COSTS OF LRDP PROPOSALS

Asset Liability Management Semi-Annual Borrower Reports (SABRe)

Public Health & Safety Bond Program 2016

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) Central Valley Opportunity Center Winton Vocational Training Center Project Proposals Due: February 21, 2014

Asset Liability Management Semi-Annual Borrower Reports (SABRe)

Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building. Draft Program. Mission Model Initial Program Development

MUROC JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT KERN COUNTY NORTH EDWARDS, CALIFORNIA

AGENDA for Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents

City of Stockton Community Development Department 345 N. El Dorado Street Stockton, CA 95202

Request for Qualifications

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education Report

NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board Agenda Letter

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent.

Project Summary University of Florida University Athletic Association, Inc. Athletic Improvements. Baseball Stadium Complex

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON REGENTS PROCEDURES: ACTION ITEM PROPOSED REVISIONS TO REGENTS POLICIES ON CAPITAL PROJECTS

WHEREAS, The revised GMO Guidelines, which implement the requirements of the GMO, are set forth below;

Semi-Annual Borrower Reports (SABRe) for Housing & Food Services, Intercollegiate Athletics and School of Medicine South Lake Union

Civic Center Facilities Master Plan

I. ACTION ITEM PRESENTATION

SPECIAL EVENTS PROCEDURE

Date:July 30, 2003 Board Members - Parks and Recreation General Manager - Parks and Recreation CHAMPLAIN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTRE ADDITION

Meeting No. 1,072 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-20

AGENDA ITEM Public Utilities Commission City and County of San Francisco

Reasonable Modification from the Planning Code

RULE BANKING OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (ERCs) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Adopted & Effective 10/22/97; Adopted & Effective (date of adoption))

Chabot College Project List Biology Building Phase 1 $0 $0 $0 Measure B $0 $0 $0 Measure A 2016 $0 $0 $0

City of Del Mar Staff Report

October 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8

San Francisco Planning Department

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Update on Athletic Program Budgets UNLV, UNR and CSN

PROJECT BUDGET PRESENTATION

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis

3. A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SUBJECT:

Merced Vision 2030 General Plan

Disclaimer for Review of Plans

Transportation Sustainability Program

PORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RESOLUTION NO

Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING

Informacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213)

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM PROJECT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

Transcription:

106 Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ADOPTION OF FINDINGS, AND APPROVAL OF DESIGN FOR MULTI-USE STADIUM, DAVIS CAMPUS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Campus: Project: Action: Executive Architect: Davis Multi-Use Stadium Approval of C and E Phases of Capital Budget, Adoption of Findings, and Approval of Design Ellerbe Becket, San Francisco Total Cost: $29,750,000. Previous Actions: January 2003: P (Preliminary Plans) $1,416,000 May 2004: W (Working Drawings) $1,378,000, for a revised total of $2,794,000 November 2003: Certified LRDP EIR analyzing this project Project Summary: Davis existing stadium, Toomey Field, was built in 1948 and has grown outdated and obsolete for current campus requirements. The Multi-Use Stadium project would replace the existing facility of 5,000 seats, as well as provide an additional 5,000 new seats, for a total of 10,000 seats. The Stadium would also contain enclosed support space of 24,185 assignable square feet (asf) within a total area of 30,231 gross square feet (gsf). Building cost for the project is $223/gsf (support buildings only; does not include stadium, bleachers, and field) with an efficiency ratio of 80 percent. The project would meet the current and future needs of the Intercollegiate Athletic Program at UC Davis and will be home to UC Davis Football, Women s Lacrosse, and regulation soccer.

COMMITTEE ON -2-106 The President is requesting approval of the full budget, approval of design, and adoption of findings for the Multi-Use Stadium project. As referenced above, the P (preliminary plans) and W (working drawings) phases of the budget have already been approved by The Regents. Approval of this recommendation would allow the campus to proceed with the C (construction) and E (equipment) phases of the work, for a total project cost of $29,750,000. Construction would begin in spring 2005, and occupancy is scheduled for fall 2006.

COMMITTEE ON -3-106 RECOMMENDATION (1) The President recommends that the Committee on Grounds and Buildings recommend to The Regents that, subject to the concurrence of the Committee on Finance: a. The 2004-05 Budget for Capital Improvements for the subject project be amended as follows: From: Davis: Multi-Use Stadium preliminary plans and working drawings $2,794,000 funding comprised of preliminary plans from campus funds ($1,416,000) and working drawings from gifts ($1,378,000) To: Davis: Multi-Use Stadium preliminary plans, working drawings, construction and equipment $29,750,000 to be funded from external financing ($20,795,000), Facilities and Campus Enhancement and Legal Education Enhancement and Access Program net revenues ($2,950,000) and gift funds ($6,005,000). (2) The President recommends that, upon review and consideration of the environmental consequences of the proposed project as indicated in the 2003 Long Range Development Plan Environmental Impact Report (LRDP EIR), the Committee on Grounds and Buildings recommend that The Regents: a. Adopt the attached Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring Program; and b. Approve the design of the Multi-Use Stadium, Davis campus. A Key to the abbreviations and the project description are attached.

COMMITTEE ON -4-106 KEY Capital Improvement Program Abbreviations S P W C E Studies Preliminary Plans Working Drawings Construction Equipment - State Funds (no abbreviation) F G HR I LB LR N R U X CCCI EPI Federal Funds Gifts Hospital Reserve Funds California Institutes for Science and Innovation Bank Loans or Bonds (External Financing includes Garamendi, Bonds, Stand-By, Interim and Bank Loans) Regents Loans (Internal Loans) Reserves other than University Registration Fee (Housing and Parking Reserves) University Registration Fee Reserves Regents Appropriations (President s Funds, Educational Fund) Campus Funds California Construction Cost Index Equipment Price Index 2004-05 Budget for Capital Improvements

COMMITTEE ON -5-106 and Capital Improvement Program Scheduled for Regents Allocation, Loans, Income Reserves, University Registration Fee Reserves, Gift Funds and Miscellaneous Funds Campus and Project Title Proposed (Total Cost) Approved 2004-05 Davis P $1,416,000 X P ($ 1,416,000) X Multi-Use Stadium W $1,378,000 G P $ 1,416,000 LB C $ 4,547,000 G C $19,379,000 LB C $ 2,950,000 N E $ 80,000 G BACKGROUND The Davis campus requests approval of the full budget, approval of design, and adoption of findings for the Multi-Use Stadium project. As described more fully below, the P (preliminary plans) and W (working drawings) phases of the budget have already been approved by The Regents. Approval of this recommendation would allow the campus to proceed with the C (construction) and E (equipment) phases of the work, for a total project cost of $29,750,000. Pending approval by the Committee on Grounds and Buildings, the Committee on Finance will be requested to approve external financing in the amount of $20,795,000 at its meeting of January 19, 2005. Davis existing stadium, Toomey Field, was built in 1948 and has grown outdated and obsolete for current campus requirements. The Multi-Use Stadium project would replace the existing facility of 5,000 seats, as well as provide an additional 5,000 new seats, for a total of 10,000 seats. The Multi-Use Stadium project would be designed to accommodate the possible future build-out of an additional 20,000 seats (which would be presented to The Regents as a separate project, subject to future availability of funds). The project would be home to UC Davis Football, Women s Lacrosse, and regulation soccer programs, and is planned to meet current and future needs of the Intercollegiate Athletic Program at UC Davis.

COMMITTEE ON -6-106 The Regents authorized the campus to proceed with P (preliminary plans) at its meeting of January 2003. At the May 2004 meeting, The Regents approved the campus to continue with the W (working drawings) phase of the project, with gift funds in the amount of $1,378,000, for a total of $2,794,000. The campus is now ready to begin work on the C phase (construction), followed by the E phase (equipment), and seeks Regental approval to do so. For more information on Financial Feasibility see Attachment 2. In December 2004, the appointment of Ellerbe Becket, of San Francisco, California, as executive architect for this project, was administratively approved within the Office of the President. Project Description and Design The Multi-Use Stadium would be built on a site north of the Health Science District, southeast of Hutchison Drive and west of La Rue Road. The proposed project is consistent with the Physical Education/Intercollegiate Athletics/Recreation land use designation in the 2003 UC Davis Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). The Stadium field would be approximately 16 feet below grade, with seating located on both sloping sides for 10,000 seats. The complex would also contain enclosed stadium support facilities totaling 24,185 assignable square feet (ASF), within a total area of 30,231 GSF, which would include public restrooms, concessions, press box, operations space, separate areas for the home team with 120 lockers, visitors team section with 60 lockers, an equipment storage room, and a sports medicine room. Seating for persons with disabilities and their companions would meet or exceed regulatory requirements. Support space buildings will be clad primarily with concrete block in colors and textures that are compatible with recently completed nearby buildings, including the Aquatics Center and the Activities and Recreation Center. The design of the Multi-Use Stadium has been reviewed in accordance with University policy by an independent design consultant and value engineering teams. UC Davis Architects & Engineers Department would manage the project with assistance from the executive design professional s project team, with outside consultants and testing agencies as necessary. The Campus Architect will perform project oversight. Construction of the project would begin in May 2005 and would be completed in September 2006. Additional project details are provided in Attachment 1.

COMMITTEE ON -7-106 Environmental Impact Summary An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act to analyze the environmental effects of the 2003 LRDP, including project-level review of the Multi-use Stadium found in Vol. III, section 4.0 of the LRDP EIR. The Regents certified the EIR in November 2003. Environmental Impact Report Organization In December 2003, a Davis neighborhood group filed a lawsuit challenging the sufficiency of the UC Davis 2003 LRDP EIR. In June 2004, the Alameda Superior Court denied the petition and found that the LRDP EIR was adequate under CEQA. In September 2004, the neighborhood group filed a notice that they would appeal the Superior Court decision. Implementation of the Multi-use Stadium Project has the potential to result in several significant impacts on the environment. A detailed summary of these impacts is included in the Findings and in the Summary Chapter of Section 4.0, Volume III of the Draft EIR in the table entitled Stadium Complex Project, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Cumulative Impacts are included in the Findings and in the LRDP Summary Chapter of Volume I of the Draft EIR in the table entitled Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Many of these impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels following implementation of proposed mitigation measures. However, significant and unavoidable impacts from the Multi-use Stadium and the 2003 LRDP would remain in the following categories: Aesthetics - Adverse effects on scenic vistas west across agricultural lands to the Coast Range. Air Quality - Construction activities would result in emissions of criteria air pollutants. Hydrology and Water Quality - Increased water extraction and increased impervious surfaces could result in a net deficit in the deep and/or shallow/intermediate aquifers and could contribute to local subsidence. Noise - Increases in noise levels due to increased traffic would result in substantial temporary noise levels in excess of standards for noise-sensitive land uses. Cumulative Impacts Summary In addition to the project specific impacts, the project will contribute to cumulative impacts in the following areas: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Transportation. Mitigation measures are available that would reduce many of these regional cumulative impacts to a less-than-significant level.

COMMITTEE ON -8-106 However, because these mitigation measures are outside the jurisdiction of the University of California, implementation cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the impact remains significant and unavoidable. Public Review of Draft LRDP EIR The Draft 2003 Long Range Development Plan EIR, including this project, was issued on May 5, 2003. The initial comment period of 60 days (May 5, 2003 through July 3, 2003) was extended an additional 30 days to August 5, 2003. The Draft EIR was widely circulated. Three public hearings were held: two on June 2, 2003, and a third public hearing was held on July 28, 2003. Approximately 150 comment letters or emails were received during the public review period and 13 individuals provided oral comments on the Draft LRDP EIR. Comment letters related specifically to the Multi-Use Stadium project generally raised concerns about impacts associated with traffic, noise and lighting during events. Several comments were received expressing the opinion that the site should be used for housing instead of for a stadium. Responses to all comments on the 2003 LRDP EIR are located in Volumes IV and V. Alternatives In addition to the alternatives proposed for 2003 LRDP project; the LRDP EIR analyzed four alternatives to the proposed Multi-use Stadium project: A smaller stadium, An alternative site north of Interstate 80 along Old Davis Road, Two alternative sites on the west campus west of State Route 113, and No project. In addition, alternatives considered but rejected as infeasible included enlargement of the existing stadium and including a track around the field in the new stadium. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The UC Davis campus would be responsible for implementing all mitigation measures within the jurisdiction of The Regents to implement, continuing programs, and procedures that serve to reduce environmental impacts identified in the EIR. To assure that all measures, programs, and procedures are implemented in accordance with CEQA, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared and is included in the Final EIR. Volume I contains the LRDP related mitigation measures and Volume III Section 4.2 contains the project-specific mitigation measures. The MMRP provides a reporting mechanism for the mitigation measures and programs and procedures that are made conditions of approval to reduce or avoid significant effects on the environment.

COMMITTEE ON -9-106 Findings The attached Findings discuss the project s environmental impacts, mitigation measures, mitigation monitoring program, and alternatives. The Findings also set forth overriding considerations for approval of the project in view of its unavoidable significant impacts. Project Budget The total project cost of $29,750,000 would be funded from external financing ($19,900,000 long-term debt and $895,000 short term debt), Facilities and Campus Enhancements (FACE) and the Legal Education Enhancement and Access Program (LEEAP) net reserves ($2,950,000), and gifts ($6,005,000). Pending approval of this action by the Committee on Grounds & Buildings, approval of external financing will be requested from the Committee on Finance at its January 2005 meeting. Gift Campaign The gift campaign for the project is under way, and as of December 2004 the campus has raised gifts totaling $2,315,000. The fund raising status is as follows: Gifts Received $ 951,000 Pledges Received $ 1,364,000 Gifts To Be Raised $ 3,690,000 Total: $ 6,005,000 In compliance with Regents policy that all funds necessary to complete construction are to be in-hand, campus funds have been encumbered to cover pledges to be collected and gifts to be raised. The campus will be repaid as additional gifts are received. (Attachments: 1 below and 2)

PROJECT STATISTICS MULTI-USE STADIUM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET DAVIS CAMPUS CCCI 4286 ATTACHMENT 1 Costs Category Stadium, Bleachers & Fields Amounts Support Buildings Amounts Total Cost Amounts % of Total Site Clearance $1,171,000 $62,000 $1,233,000 4.2% Building $5,887,000 $6,735,000 $12,622,000 42.5% Exterior Utilities $1,479,000 $1,003,000 $2,482,000 8.4% Site Development $6,541,000 $52,000 $6,593,000 22.2% A/E Fees (a) $1,285,000 $755,000 $2,040,000 6.9% Campus Administration (b) $709,000 $416,000 $1,125,000 3.8% Surveys & Tests $295,000 $175,000 $470,000 1.6% Special Items (c) $1,224,000 $734,000 $1,958,000 6.6% Contingency $723,000 $424,000 $1,147,000 3.9% Total $19,314,000 $10,356,000 $29,670,000 100% Group 2 & 3 Equipment $80,000 Total Project (d) $29,750,000 100% Statistics Support Category Buildings Gross Square Feet (e) 30,231 Assignable Square Feet (e) 24,185 Ratio ASF/GSF 80% Building Cost/GSF $223 Total Seats 10,000 (stadium only) Construction Cost/Seat $2,293 (stadium and support buildings) Comparable University Projects at CCCI 4286 Support Buildings only Project Building Cost/GSF Ratio ASF/GSF Date of latest Approval UCD Aquatics Center (Buildings only) $258 85% 9/17/2001 Total Stadium Project Within the UC system, there are no recent projects that could be considered directly comparable to the UC Davis Multi-Use Stadium. It is also difficult to identify direct comps outside the UC system given the wide variations in program, and the small number of projects recently executed in California. These differences notwithstanding, construction cost of projects reviewed in the course of this examination ranged from $2,000 to $5,000 per seat. Construction cost of UCD s Multi-Use Stadium is at the low end of that range ($2,293 per seat), reflecting a cost-conscious approach to the project. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) A/E fees include executive architect fees for basic services of $1,700,000, which is 7.4% of the approved construction budget. Campus Administration includes project management and inspection. Special Items include Detailed Project Program, design reviews, cost estimation, environmental study, seismic review, value engineering, and other special consultants. Current formal estimates verify that projected costs are within the approved budget. Gross square feet (GSF) is the total area, including usable area and space occupied by the structure itself. Assignable square feet (ASF) is the net usable area.