Economic and Social Council

Similar documents
Spain France. England Netherlands. Wales Ukraine. Republic of Ireland Czech Republic. Romania Albania. Serbia Israel. FYR Macedonia Latvia

FCCC/SBI/2010/10/Add.1

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - APRIL 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - MAY 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Comparing pay trends in the public services and private sector. Labour Research Department 7 June 2018 Brussels

FY18 Campaign Terms. CAMPAIGN AGREEMENT ( Campaign Agreement ) FOR CEE DYNAMICS 365 CSP CAMPAIGN ( Program )

Double Tax Treaties. Necessity of Declaration on Tax Beneficial Ownership In case of capital gains tax. DTA Country Withholding Tax Rates (%)

Using health spending to achieve fiscal consolidation objectives?

Enterprise Europe Network SME growth forecast

TRADE IN GOODS OF BULGARIA WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - JUNE 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Enterprise Europe Network SME growth outlook

The following table shall replace the table in Annex B to the Protocol:

InnovFin SME Guarantee

Entitlement to NHS Hospital Treatment for Non-Resident UK Citizens

Scale of Assessment of Members' Contributions for 2008

United Nations Environment Programme

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND PREVENTION (AIG) DIVISIONAL MEETING (2008)

Economic and Social Council

FAQs. 1. Event registration. Dear participants,

THE INVERTING PYRAMID: DEMOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES TO THE PENSION SYSTEMS IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA

Slovenia Country Profile

Financial situation by the end of Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received by 31 December 2016 (in Euro)...3

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Financial situation by the end of Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received by 31 December 2017 (in Euro)...3

Latvia Country Profile

Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol pursuant to its Article 3, paragraph 9 (the Doha Amendment)

Report Penalties and measures imposed under the UCITS Directive in 2016 and 2017

EU-28 RECOVERED PAPER STATISTICS. Mr. Giampiero MAGNAGHI On behalf of EuRIC

Borderline cases for salary, social contribution and tax

Approach to Employment Injury (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 CROATIA

EU BUDGET AND NATIONAL BUDGETS

Co-facilitators non-paper on proposed amendments to the Kyoto Protocol

Information Leaflet No. 5

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 UKRAINE. New paths ahead for international tax controversy

Coach Plus Breakdown Insurance

DG TAXUD. STAT/11/100 1 July 2011

Performance of EBRD Private Equity Funds Portfolio Data to 31 st December EBRD 2011, all rights reserved

Performance of Private Equity Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS

Draft decision -/CMP.7

European Advertising Business Climate Index Q4 2016/Q #AdIndex2017

Information Leaflet No. 5

Lithuania Country Profile

English - Or. French EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

TRENDS AND MARKERS Signatories to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime

LIFESTYLE REWARDS 2017 GENERAL INFORMATION & POLICIES

Long Term Reform Agenda International Perspective

Legal and commercial information - cost estimation for the financing plan

EUREKA Programme A European Research Programme. > Not an EU-Programme (but complementarity and co-operation - ERA)

Lowest implicit tax rates on labour in Malta, on consumption in Spain and on capital in Lithuania

How to complete a payment application form (NI)

EUROPA - Press Releases - Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax...of GDP in 2008 Steady decline in top corporate income tax rate since 2000

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

Live Long and Prosper? Demographic Change and Europe s Pensions Crisis. Dr. Jochen Pimpertz Brussels, 10 November 2015

Croatia Country Profile

The Budapest Treaty. on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure

Performance of Private Equity Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS Data to 31 December 2008

Slovakia Country Profile

Pension Reforms Revisited Asta Zviniene Sr. Social Protection Specialist Human Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank

FOREWORD. Estonia. Services provided by member firms include:

Finland Country Profile

11 th Economic Trends Survey of the Impact of Economic Downturn

ICAO Resolution on GMBM Assembly Decisions & Next Steps

EU State aid: Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy making of -

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU PRELIMINARY DATA

JOINT STATEMENT. The representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of

A. INTRODUCTION AND FINANCING OF THE GENERAL BUDGET. EXPENDITURE Description Budget Budget Change (%)

Ukraine. WTS Global Country TP Guide Last Update: December Legal Basis

Fiscal rules in Lithuania

Quarterly Gross Domestic Product of Montenegro 2st quarter 2016

Agreements with other countries

MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

BTSF FOOD HYGIENE AND FLEXIBILITY. Notification To NCPs

NOTE. for the Interparliamentary Meeting of the Committee on Budgets

Quarterly Gross Domestic Product of Montenegro 3 rd quarter 2017

34 th Associates Meeting - Andorra, 25 May Item 5: Evolution of economic governance in the EU

Tax Card 2018 Effective from 1 January 2018 The Republic of Estonia

The Architectural Profession in Europe 2012

Gerry Weber International AG

Consumer Credit. Introduction. June, the 6th (2013)

The current state of the electricity market in Bulgaria

Proposal by the Chair to facilitate negotiations

5 th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES May 2012, La Rochelle, France RESOLUTION 5.21 FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

FSMA_2017_05-01 of 24/02/2017

Second SHA2011-based pilot data collection 2014

Withholding Tax Handbook BELGIUM. Version 1.2 Last Updated: June 20, New York Hong Kong London Madrid Milan Sydney

Electricity & Gas Prices in Ireland. Annex Business Electricity Prices per kwh 2 nd Semester (July December) 2016

Austria Country Profile

EUA MEMBER CONSULTATION A CONTRIBUTION TO THE ERASMUS+ MID-TERM REVIEW

ORD ISIN: DE / CINS CUSIP: D (ADR: / US )

Contents. Andreas Athinodorou Managing Director International Tax Planning

Draft proposal by the Chair to facilitate preparations for negotiations

Summary of key findings

Quarterly Gross Domestic Product of Montenegro 4 th quarter 2018 (p)

Taxation trends in the European Union Further increase in VAT rates in 2012 Corporate and top personal income tax rates inch up after long decline

Albania. Restructuring Public Expenditure to Sustain Growth. Public Expenditure and Institutional Review

TAXATION (IMPLEMENTATION) (CONVENTION ON MUTUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE IN TAX MATTERS) (AMENDMENT OF REGULATIONS No. 3) (JERSEY) ORDER 2017

(of 19 March 2013) Valid from 1 January A. Taxpayers

Withholding Tax Rate under DTAA

Transcription:

United Nations ECE/MP.PP/WG.1/2011/L.7 Economic and Social Council Distr.: Limited 25 November 2010 Original: English Economic Commission for Europe Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters Working Group of the Parties Thirteenth meeting Geneva, 9 11 February 2011 Item 6 (d) of the provisional agenda Programme of work and operation of the Convention: financial matters Draft decision on financial arrangements Prepared by the Bureau with the assistance of the secretariat Summary This document contains a proposed draft decision on financial arrangements, which was prepared in accordance with the decision of the Working Group of the Parties to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) taken at its twelfth meeting (30 June 2 July 2010; ECE/MP.PP/WG.1/2010/2, para. 45) and a decision by the Bureau of the Meeting of the Parties to the Convention taken at its twenty-sixth meeting (9 November 2010). The Working Group may wish to consider the present draft decision with a view of submitting it for consideration and adoption by the Meeting of the Parties at its fourth session, which will be held in Chisinau from 15 to 17 June 2011. GE.10-25871

The Meeting of the Parties, Recalling article 10, paragraph 3, of the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), which states that the Meeting of the Parties to the Convention may, as necessary, consider establishing financial arrangements on a consensus basis, Recalling also its decisions I/13, II/6 and III/7, through which an interim voluntary scheme of contributions based on a system of shares, open to contributions from Parties, Signatories and other States having opted to participate in it, has been established and maintained, Recognizing the need to: (a) Ensure that sufficient resources are available for implementing the Convention s work programme; (b) Establish a scheme of financial contributions which is transparent and accessible to all Parties, Signatories and other States and organizations wishing to contribute; (c) Establish financial arrangements under the Convention based on the principles of a fair sharing of the burden, stable and predictable sources of funding, accountability and sound financial management, Noting that the amounts contributed under the interim voluntary scheme have fallen short of the estimated costs of implementing the work programme and that the financial burden has not been evenly distributed, with significant numbers of Parties and Signatories not contributing at all, Believing that the financial arrangements in place under the Convention will need to be kept under periodic review by the Meeting to ensure that they continue to meet the goals of stability, predictability and a fair sharing of the burden, 1. Establishes a voluntary scheme of contributions aimed at covering the costs of activities under the work programme that are not covered by the United Nations regular budget, based on the following principles: (a) The Parties should collectively ensure that the costs of the activities of the work programme that are not covered by the United Nations regular budget are covered through the financial scheme; (b) The burden of covering the costs of the activities may be distributed among the Parties to the Convention in proportion to the United Nations scale of assessments; 1 (c) Each Party may decide to contribute each year, as a minimum, the amount derived from applying the adjusted scale of assessments referred to in subparagraph (b) to the total estimated costs of the activities; (d) dollars; No Party or Signatory is expected to contribute less than 200 United States 1 The United Nations scale of assessments is adopted by the General Assembly for a three-year period. It provides the basis for calculating the contributions of Member States to the United Nations regular budget. In February 2010, the General Assembly adopted a scale for the period 2010 2012 (resolution A/RES/64/248). The fundamental principle for calculating Member States contributions is that the expenses of the Organization shall be apportioned among Member States according to capacity to pay (resolution A/RES/58/1 B of 3 March 2004). 2

(e) Contributions shall be made in cash and shall not be earmarked for a particular activity; (f) Additional contributions may be made in cash or in kind and may be earmarked for a particular activity; (g) Contributions in cash shall be made through the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Trust Fund for Local Technical Cooperation (Aarhus Convention project); (h) Contributions for a given calendar year should be made by the end of the preceding year, so as to secure staff costs for the smooth functioning of the secretariat, as a priority, and the timely and effective implementation of the priority activities of the programme of work for 2012 2014; 2. Decides that the Parties could contribute each year towards the costs of activities under the work programme in accordance with the scheme established through paragraph 1, the indicative contribution of each Party for 2012 being as shown in the annex; 3. Invites Signatories, other interested States and organizations to contribute, in cash or in kind, towards covering the costs of the work programme; 4. Encourages Parties that have historically contributed generously to maintain, or return to, their previous levels of contribution; 5. Also encourages Parties that have so far not contributed, or have contributed significantly less than the amounts stipulated in paragraph 1 (d), to increase their contributions during the current and future budget cycles to the specified levels, and requests the Bureau to liaise with such Parties where appropriate concerning the achievement of this goal; 6. Requests the secretariat, in accordance with the financial rules of the United Nations, to monitor the expenditure of the funds and to prepare annual reports for review by the Working Group of the Parties in order to ensure that the level of contributions matches the level of funding needed for the implementation of the work programme; 7. Also requests the Working Group of the Parties to consider, in the light of these annual reports, whether changes would be required in the content or timeframe of the work programme, in the event that the level of actual and/or pledged contributions does not match the level of funding needed; 8. Further requests the secretariat to prepare a comprehensive report for each session of the Meeting of the Parties, including information on how much Parties and other participating States and organizations have contributed to the budget of the Convention in cash and in kind, and on how the contributions were spent; 9. Agrees to review the operation of the scheme of financial arrangements at its fifth meeting. 3

Annex United Nations scale of assessment-based levels of contribution to the Aarhus trust fund Column A: Countries (Parties and Signatories) Column B: United Nations scale of assessments Column C: Adjusted United Nations scale of assessments a Column D: Amount to be contributed for 2012 (US$) b Albania 0.010 0.024 Armenia 0.005 0.012 Austria 0.851 2.051 Azerbaijan 0.015 0.036 Belarus 0.042 0.101 Belgium 1.075 2.591 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.014 0.034 Bulgaria 0.038 0.092 Croatia 0.097 0.234 Cyprus 0.046 0.111 Czech Republic 0.349 0.841 Denmark 0.736 1.774 Estonia 0.040 0.096 Finland 0.566 1.364 France 6.123 14.756 Georgia 0.006 0.015 Germany 8.018 19.323 Greece 0.691 1.665 Hungary 0.291 0.701 Italy 4.999 12.048 Kazakhstan 0.076 0.183 Kyrgyzstan 0.001 0.002 Latvia 0.038 0.092 Liechtenstein 0.009 0.022 Lithuania 0.065 0.157 Luxembourg 0.090 0.217 Malta 0.017 0.041 Moldova 0.002 0.005 Montenegro 0.004 0.010 Netherlands 1.855 4.471 Norway 0.871 2.099 Poland 0.828 1.995 Portugal 0.511 1.232 4

Column A: Countries (Parties and Signatories) Column B: United Nations scale of assessments Column C: Adjusted United Nations scale of assessments a Column D: Amount to be contributed for 2012 (US$) b Romania 0.177 0.427 Serbia 0.037 0.089 Slovakia 0.142 0.342 Slovenia 0.103 0.248 Spain 3.177 7.657 Sweden 1.064 2.564 Tajikistan 0.002 0.005 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 0.007 0.017 Turkmenistan 0.026 0.063 Ukraine 0.087 0.210 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 6.604 15.916 Iceland 0.042 0.101 Ireland 0.498 1.200 Monaco 0.003 0.007 Switzerland 1.130 2.723 European Union c Total 41.000 100.000 a The percentages from the United Nations scale of assessments have been adjusted for the Aarhus Convention by using a multiplier of 2.41, in order to arrive at a total of 100 per cent. b Subject to footnote 3 below on the contribution of the European Union (EU), the figures in column D would be derived by multiplying the percentage value in column C by the annual estimated cost requirement of the work programme, as specified in the draft decision on the work programme 2012 2014. The actual amounts for the contribution of each Party and Signatory between 2012 and 2014 have not been included in this annex, given that the draft decision on the work programme for 2012 2014 and the associated cost estimates are still to be discussed. These figures could be included either in this annex or be integrated in the decision on the work programme for 2012 2014. c A percentage has not been assigned to the EU, since the EU is not included in the United Nations scale of assessments and therefore it is not possible to calculate the level of its contribution on the same basis as with the other Parties and Signatories (i.e., on the basis of the adapted United Nations scale of assessments). Possible alternative ways of estimating the level of contributions to be made by the EU include: (a) using historical contributions of the EU as the basis of calculation, and deducting this from the total estimated cost requirement prior to applying the United Nations scale of assessments to the other Parties; or (b) assigning a chosen percentage, which is not derived from the United Nations scale of assessments. 5