EUA MEMBER CONSULTATION A CONTRIBUTION TO THE ERASMUS+ MID-TERM REVIEW
|
|
- Edith Henry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EUA MEMBER CONSULTATION A CONTRIBUTION TO THE ERASMUS+ MID-TERM REVIEW
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 Participation in sub-questionnaires on specific actions KA1: Student Mobility KA1: Staff Mobility KA2: Strategic Partnerships KA2: Capacity Building in Higher Education I do not wish to continue - I submit now KA1: Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees KA2: Knowledge Alliances KA3: Support to Reforms in the Higher Education Area
9 Armenia Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Georgia Iceland Ireland Kazakhstan Lithuania Luxembourg Serbia Belarus Finland FYR Macedonia Greece Hungary Slovenia Ukraine Slovakia Switzerland Bulgaria Norway Denmark Portugal Romania Turkey Czech Republic Netherlands Sweden Austria Belgium France United Kingdom Italy Spain Germany Poland Sample distribution EUA member non-eua member Size of participating institutions by number of students enrolled 2 40% very small - less than 7,500 small - betweeen 7,500 and 14,999 14% medium - between 15,000 and 24,999 19% very large - more than 25,000
10 Survey participant position 13% 5% Level of experience with EU funding programmes for E&T 3% 16% 65% 35% 62% International Office Other service, please indicate Vice-rector's office Rector's office Very experienced Just started Some experience No experience at all
11
12 ERASMUS+ compared to the LLP: Opportunities It offers better opportunities for collaboration and exchange with partners outside of Europe 73% 9% 6% 12% It offers better opportunities for mobility 56% 32% 6% It offers better opportunities for collaboration and exchange with partners outside of the higher education sector (industry, schools, NGOs ) 55% 19% 3% 23% It offers better opportunities for collaboration with European university partners 3 4 9% Yes About the same No I do not know
13 ERASMUS+ compared to the LLP: Simplification It is more flexible in the use of the grants (allocation and reallocation to different purposes within the budgets) 35% % Applications are easier 31% 41% 22% The new programme structure makes things easier 30% 22% 40% 8% The programme rules are easier to follow 18% 3 38% Implementation is easier 1 38% 38% 8% It has less administrative burden 12% 16% 65% Yes About the same No I do not know
14 Erasmus+ management support Management of the project by the National Agency is smooth and transparent 56% 33% 9% 3% Support from the National Agency is usually helpful and efficient 55% 36% 8% 1% Support from the National Agency is usually prompt and without much delay 54% 36% 9% 1% Management of the project by EACEA is smooth and transparent 31% 26% 11% 32% Support from the EACEA is usually helpful and efficient 25% 33% 11% 31% Support from the EACEA is usually prompt and without much delay 22% 33% 13% 32% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
15 Erasmus+ tools The Erasmus+ Programme Guide provides clear and easy to find answers to most issues 24% 53% 22% 1% The Mobility Tool is a useful support tool for grant management 22% 40% 32% 5% Information on suitable calls and funding opportunities are easy to find on the website, and are generally well promoted 35% 50% 13% 2% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
16 ERASMUS+ funding rules and procedures It has clear funding rules 48% 44% 8% Use of grants is flexible 24% 4 26% 3% Financial reporting and accounting is easy 20% 42% 33% 6% Recording of staff costs and completion of time sheets is straightforward 18% 39% 21% 23% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know Mobility: cost coverage as an obstacle for participation 28% 3% 18% Yes, fully No, not really 51% Yes, to some extent I do not know
17 Cooperation: cost coverage as an obstacle for participation 11% 18% 2 Yes, fully No, not really 44% Yes, to some extent I do not know
18
19
20 Erasmus+ priorities Languages 28% 53% 12% Vulnerable groups 1 45% 19% 18% Remote areas 12% 43% 18% 2 Refugees 5% 15% 2 53% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
21
22 Erasmus+ improving mobility With Erasmus+, student mobility has improved 26% 36% 32% With Erasmus+, staff mobility has improved 29% 42% 18% 10% With Erasmus+, Erasmus Mundus has improved % Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
23 KA1 - Student mobility opportunities We will continue to use this action 8 11% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for European students to study in Europe 84% 15% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for non-eu students to study in Europe 69% 24% 4% 3% It is an attractive opportunity for European students to study outside of Europe 48% 36% 13% 3% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
24 KA1 - student mobility administration Support from the National Agency is sufficient 56% 3 5% 1% The inter-institutional agreement requirements are appropriate 39% 46% 13% 1% For the student, the application process is straightforward, and with no major problems 33% 44% 21% 2% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 32% 50% 18% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 32% 38% 28% 2% The reporting requirements for students are appropriate and make sense 29% 52% 18% 1% The rules of programme cause no major problems to students 28% 51% 21% The action is sufficiently flexible 26% 50% 20% 3% With the new Erasmus+, this action has improved 26% 36% 32% Management of the student mobility grants via Mobility Tool works well 24% 42% 29% 5% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (=not unnecessarily bureaucratic & work intensive) 19% 36% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know 44% 1%
25 KA1 - Student mobility funding The overall number of available grants is sufficient 1 40% 42% 1% Funding ceilings for travel costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder students from participating) 16% 44% 29% 11% The amount of funding provided to the student is appropriate (= while it may not cover the full costs, it usually does not hinder students from participating) 11% 54% 35% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
26 Erasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE) Erasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE) Yes, it has improved the quality of our internationalisation activities 64% No, as we are already quality assured but it may be useful for other institutions 26% No, it is not useful for any institution and should be abolished I do not know 5% 6% Online Linguistic Support Tool (OLS)
27 Do you believe that Online Linguistic Support (OLS) tool in its present shape is useful? It contributes to promoting language learning and linguistic diversity 28% 48% 9% 14% It is beneficial and relevant for students 24% 54% 11% 11% It provides good quality language courses 16% 44% 6% 34% It is a reliable tool for assessing language skills 16% 56% 1 11% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
28 KA1 - Staff mobility opportunities We will continue to use this action 88% 11% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for teaching staff 66% 29% 3% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for administrative (nonteaching) staff 66% 33% 1% It is useful that it allows for the sending of university staff to enterprises (though we have not used this function) 28% 39% 26% It is useful that it allows for the sending of university staff to enterprises (and we have been using this function) 16% 1 20% 4 Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
29 KA1 Staff mobility administration Support from the National Agency is sufficient 5 38% 3% 2% For the staff, the application process is straightforward, and with no major problems 52% 3 8% 3% The programme rules cause no major problems to staff 50% 41% 9% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 48% 45% 8% The inter-institutional agreement requirements are appropriate 4 41% 9% 3% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 45% 43% 10% 2% The reporting requirements for staff are appropriate and make sense 42% 48% 10% The action is sufficiently flexible 34% 54% 10% 2% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 32% 43% 25% With the new Erasmus+, this action has improved 29% 42% 18% 10% Management of the staff mobility grants via the Mobility Tool works well 23% 46% 25% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
30 KA1 Staff mobility funding The overall number of available grants is sufficient 29% 41% 29% 1% Funding ceilings are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participating) 28% 4 24% 2% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient (= while it may not cover the full costs, it usually does not hinder participation) 24% 52% 24% Funding ceilings for travel costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 24% 43% 33% 1% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
31 KA1 Erasmus Mundus opportunities It is an attractive opportunity for international students 7 20% 3% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation among European higher education institutions 6 33% We will continue to use this action 53% 3 3% It is an attractive opportunity for European students 50% 4 3% It is an attractive opportunity for including international higher education institutions 43% 4 10% It is an attractive opportunity for teaching staff 33% 60% 3% 3% It is an attractive opportunity for including nonuniversity partners (industries, NGOs etc.) 30% 50% 13% With Erasmus+, this action has improved % Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
32 KA1 Erasmus Mundus administration The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 3 50% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 33% 33% 20% 13% The partnership requirements are reasonable 33% 5 3% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 1 53% 23% The application process is straightforward % 13% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 13% 33% 4 The action is sufficiently flexible 13% 5 20% 10% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
33 KA1 Erasmus Mundus funding The funding ceilings are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 13% 63% 1 The amount of funding provided by the action is sufficient 10% 5 30% 3% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
34 Capacity building Knowledge alliances Strategic partnerships Key Action 2: Available opportunities - Success rates It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation among European higher education institutions 68% 2 4% 2% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 15% 43% 35% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation between higher education institutions and business 60% 35% 5% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 11% 11% 63% 16% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation for a HEI from Partner countries (non-eu/eea) 81% 16% 3% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 11% 51% 22% 16% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
35 KA2 -Strategic Partnership opportunities We will continue to apply for these projects 69% 24% 2% 6% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation among European higher education institutions 68% 2 4% 2% This action is a useful addition to EU funding opportunities 59% 3 2% 2% It is an attractive opportunity for including non-university partners (industries, NGOs etc.) 56% 29% It is an attractive opportunity for including international higher education institutions 49% 29% 18% 4% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
36 KA2 Strategic Partnerships administration The partnership requirements are reasonable 42% 49% 5% 4% The application process is straightforward 31% 54% 13% 2% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work 30% 54% 15% 2% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 28% 43% 19% 11% The action is sufficiently flexible 22% 54% 20% 4% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 20% 65% 13% 2% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 15% 43% 35% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
37 KA2 Strategic Partnerships funding The funding ceilings for staff are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 1 55% 25% 4% The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 11% 59% 22% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient 56% 31% 6% The overall number of available grants is sufficient 4% 26% 59% 11% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
38 KA2 Strategic Partnerships structure and decentralisation Management of the projects by the National Agency works well 38% 43% 6% 13% The selection process by the National Agency is clear, fully transparent, and well-managed 3 44% 13% 6% It would be better to have this action selected and managed at European level 23% 11% 53% 13% The separation of the action in two strands supporting cooperation for innovation and exchange of best practices is clear and makes sense 13% 50% 25% 12% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
39 KA2 Knowledge Alliances opportunities It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation between higher education institutions and business 60% 35% 5% We will continue to apply for these projects 53% 11% 3 This action is a useful addition to the EU funding opportunities 53% 3 5% 5% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
40 KA2 Knowledge Alliances administration The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 25% 55% 10% 10% The partnership requirements are reasonable 25% 60% 5% 10% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 21% 63% 11% 5% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 16% 26% 26% 32% Management of the projects at the EACEA works well 16% 26% 58% The application and selection process managed by EACEA works well 16% 4 3 The application process is straightforward 15% 45% 20% 20% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 11% 11% 63% 16% The action is sufficiently flexible 5% 65% 30% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
41 KA2 Knowledge Alliances funding The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient 20% 45% 20% 15% The funding ceilings for staff are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 15% 50% 20% 15% The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 5% 55% 25% 15% The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 5% 55% 25% 15% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
42 KA2 Capacity Building opportunities It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation for a HEI from Partner countries (non-eu/eea) 81% 16% 3% We will continue to apply for these projects 73% 22% 5% Merging different programmes that existed before (Alfa, Tempus, Asia Link etc.) into one was in principle a good idea 68% 19% 3% 11% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation for a HEI from Programme countries (= EU/EEA) 51% 46% 3% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know KA2 Capacity Building administration The partnership requirements are reasonable 43% 51% 3% 3% The application process is straightforward 43% 43% 11% 3% The application and selection process managed by EACEA works well 35% 38% 2 Management of the projects at the EACEA works well 30% 35% 35% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 30% 54% 14% 3% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply % 3% The action is sufficiently flexible 19% 73% 8% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 11% 51% 22% 16% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
43 KA2 Capacity Building funding The overall amount of available grants is sufficient 1 31% 39% 14% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient 16% 49% 30% 5% The funding ceilings for staff are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 14% 49% 35% 3% The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder participation) 8% 5 30% 5% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
44
45
46
47 It offers better opportunities for collaboration and exchange with partners outside of Europe 73% 9% 6% 12% It offers better opportunities for mobility 56% 32% 6% It offers better opportunities for collaboration and exchange with partners outside of the higher education sector (industry, schools, NGOs ) 55% 19% 3% 23% It offers better opportunities for collaboration with European university partners 3 4 9% It is more flexible in the use of the grants (allocation and reallocation to different purposes within the budgets) 35% % Applications are easier 31% 41% 22% The new programme structure makes things easier 30% 22% 40% 8% The programme rules are easier to follow 18% 3 38% Implementation is easier 1 38% 38% 8% It has less administrative burden 12% 16% 65% Yes About the same No I do not know
48 Management of the project by the National Agency is smooth and transparent 56% 33% 9% 3% Support from the National Agency (the agency of the EC that manages the contracts) is usually helpful and efficient 55% 36% 8% 1% Support from the National Agency (the agency of the EC that manages the contracts) is usually prompt and without much delay 54% 36% 9% 1% Information on suitable calls and funding opportunities are easy to find on the website, and are generally well promoted 35% 50% 13% 2% Management of the project by EACEA is smooth and transparent 31% 26% 11% 32% Support from the EACEA (the agency of the EC that manages the contracts) is usually helpful and efficient 25% 33% 11% 31% The Erasmus Users Guide provides clear and easy to find answers to most issues 24% 53% 22% 1% The Mobility Tool is a useful support tool for grant management 22% 40% 32% 5% Support from the EACEA (the agency of the EC that manages the contracts) is usually prompt and without much delay 22% 33% 13% 32% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
49 It has clear funding rules 48% 44% 8% 0% Use of grants is flexible 24% 4 26% 3% Financial reporting and accounting is easy 20% 42% 33% 6% Mobility: As grants do not cover the full cost, this is an obstacle for participation 18% 51% 28% 3% Cooperation: As ceilings and allowances (staff cost, travel etc.) do not cover the full cost, this is an obstacle for participation 18% 44% 2 11% Recording of staff costs and completion of time sheets is straightforward 18% 39% 21% 23% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
50 We will continue to use this action 8 11% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for European students to study in Europe 84% 15% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for non-eu students to study in Europe 69% 24% 4% 3% Support from the National Agency is sufficient 56% 3 5% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for European students to study outside of Europe 48% 36% 13% 3% The inter-institutional agreement requirements are appropriate 39% 46% 13% 1% For the student, the application process is straightforward, and with no major problems 33% 44% 21% 2% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 32% 50% 18% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 32% 38% 28% 2% The reporting requirements for students are appropriate and make sense 29% 52% 18% 1% The rules of programme cause no major problems to students 28% 51% 21% The action is sufficiently flexible 26% 50% 20% 3% With the new Erasmus+, this action has improved 26% 36% 32% Management of the student mobility grants via Mobility Tool works well 24% 42% 29% 5% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 19% 36% 44% 1% The overall number of available grants is sufficient 1 40% 42% 1% Funding ceilings for travel costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder students from participating) The amount of funding provided to the student is appropriate (= while it may not cover the full costs, it usually does not hinder students from participating) 16% 11% 44% 54% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know 29% 35% 11%
51 We will continue to use this action 88% 11% 1% It is an attractive opportunity for teaching staff 66% 29% 3% It is an attractive opportunity for administrative (nonteaching) staff 66% 33% 1% Support from the National Agency is sufficient 5 38% 3% 2% For the staff, the application process is straightforward, and with no major problems 52% 3 8% 3% The rules of programme cause no major problems to staff 50% 41% 9% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 48% 45% 8% The inter-institutional agreement requirements are appropriate 4 41% 9% 3% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 45% 43% 10% 2% The reporting requirements for staff are appropriate and make sense 42% 48% 10% The action is sufficiently flexible 34% 54% 10% 2% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 32% 43% 25% With the new Erasmus+, this action has improved 29% 42% 18% 10% The overall number of available grants is sufficient 29% 41% 29% 1% It is useful that it allows for sending university staff to enterprises (though we have not used this function) 28% 39% 26% Funding ceilings are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 28% 4 24% 2% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient (= while it may not cover the full costs, it usually does not hinder staff from participating) Funding ceilings for travel costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 24% 24% 52% 43% 24% 33% 1% Management of the staff mobility grants via the Mobility Tool works well 23% 46% 25% It is useful that it allows for sending university staff to enterprises (and we have been using this function) 16% 1 20% 4 Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
52 It is attractive opportunity for international students 7 20% 3% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation among European higher education institutions 6 33% We will continue to use this action 53% 3 3% It is an attractive opportunity for European students 50% 4 3% It is an attractive opportunity for including international higher education institutions 43% 4 10% 0% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 3 50% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 33% 33% 20% 13% The partnership requirements are reasonable 33% 5 3% It is an attractive opportunity for teaching staff 33% 60% 3% 3% It is an attractive opportunity for including nonuniversity partners (industries, NGOs etc.) 30% 50% 13% With the new Erasmus+, this action has improved % The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 1 53% 23% The application process is straightforward % 13% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 13% 33% 4 The funding ceilings are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 13% 63% 1 The action is sufficiently flexible 13% 5 20% 10% The amount of funding provided by the action is sufficient. 10% 5 30% 3% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not really I do not know
53 We will continue to apply for these projects 69% 24% 2% 6% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation among European higher education institutions 68% 2 4% This action is a useful addition to the EU funding opportunities 59% 3 2% It is an attractive opportunity for including non-university partners (industries, NGOs etc.) 56% 29% It is an attractive opportunity for including international higher education institutions 49% 29% 18% 4% The partnership requirements are reasonable 42% 49% 5% 4% Management of the projects by the National Agency works well 38% 43% 6% 13% The selection process by the National Agency is clear, fully transparent, and well-managed 3 44% 13% 6% The application process is straightforward 31% 54% 13% 2% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 30% 54% 15% 2% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 28% 43% 19% 11% It would be better to have this action selected and managed at European level 23% 11% 53% 13% The action is sufficiently flexible 22% 54% 20% 4% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 20% 65% 13% 2% The funding ceilings for staff are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 1 55% 25% 4% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 15% 43% 35% The separation of the action in two strands supporting cooperation for innovation and exchange of best practices is clear and makes sense The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 13% 11% 50% 59% 25% 22% 12% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient 56% 31% 6% The overall number of available grants is sufficient 4% 26% 59% 11% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
54 It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation between higher education institutions and business 60% 35% 5% We will continue to apply for these projects 53% 11% 3 This action is a useful addition to the EU funding opportunities 53% 3 5% 5% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 25% 55% 10% 10% The partnership requirements are reasonable 25% 60% 5% 10% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply 21% 63% 11% 5% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient 20% 45% 20% 15% We have experienced no major problems with the action over the past year 16% 26% 26% 32% Management of the projects at the EACEA works well 16% 26% 58% The application and selection process managed by EACEA works well 16% 4 3 The funding ceilings for staff are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 15% 50% 20% 15% The application process is straightforward 15% 45% 20% 20% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 11% 11% 63% 16% The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 5% 55% 25% 15% The action is sufficiently flexible 5% 65% 30% The overall amount of available grants is sufficient 20% 60% 20% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
55 It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation for a HEI from Partner countries (non-eu/eea) 81% 16% 3% We will continue to apply for these projects 73% 22% 5% Merging different programmes that existed before (Alfa, Tempus, Asia Link etc.) into one was in principle a good idea 68% 19% 3% 11% It is an attractive opportunity for cooperation for a HEI from Programme countries (= EU/EEA) 51% 46% 3% The partnership requirements are reasonable 43% 51% 3% 3% The application process is straightforward 43% 43% 11% 3% The application and selection process managed by EACEA works well 35% 38% 2 Management of the projects at the EACEA works well 30% 35% 35% The requirements for the higher education institutions are appropriate (= not unnecessarily bureaucratic and work intensive) 30% 54% 14% 3% The financial rules are clear and easy to apply % 3% The action is sufficiently flexible 19% 73% 8% The overall amount of available grants is sufficient 1 31% 39% 14% The amount of funding provided by the grant is sufficient 16% 49% 30% 5% The funding ceilings for staff are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 14% 49% 35% 3% Preparing applications is worth the time investment - in terms of success rate 11% 51% 22% 16% The funding ceilings for other costs are appropriate (= while they may not cover the full costs, they usually do not hinder from participating) 8% 5 30% 5% Yes, fully Yes, to some extent No, not at all I do not know
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64 The European University Association (EUA) is the representative organisation of universities and national rectors conferences in 47 European countries. EUA plays a crucial role in the Bologna Process and in influencing EU policies on higher education, research and innovation. Thanks to its interaction with a range of other European and international organisations EUA ensures that the independent voice of European universities is heard wherever decisions are being taken that will impact on their activities. The Association provides a unique expertise in higher education and research as well as a forum for exchange of ideas and good practice among universities. The results of EUA s work are made available to members and stakeholders through conferences, seminars, website and publications. European University Association asbl Avenue de l Yser Brussels, Belgium Tel: Fax:
Spain France. England Netherlands. Wales Ukraine. Republic of Ireland Czech Republic. Romania Albania. Serbia Israel. FYR Macedonia Latvia
Germany Belgium Portugal Spain France Switzerland Italy England Netherlands Iceland Poland Croatia Slovakia Russia Austria Wales Ukraine Sweden Bosnia-Herzegovina Republic of Ireland Czech Republic Turkey
More informationEconomic and Social Council
United Nations ECE/MP.PP/WG.1/2011/L.7 Economic and Social Council Distr.: Limited 25 November 2010 Original: English Economic Commission for Europe Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on Access to
More informationApproach to Employment Injury (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD
Approach to (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD The benefits of protection can be divided in three main groups. The cash benefits include disability pensions, survivor's pensions and other short-
More informationComparing pay trends in the public services and private sector. Labour Research Department 7 June 2018 Brussels
Comparing pay trends in the public services and private sector Labour Research Department 7 June 2018 Brussels Issued to be covered The trends examined The varying patterns over 14 years and the impact
More informationFinancial situation by the end of Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received by 31 December 2016 (in Euro)...3
European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources (ECPGR) Phase IX (2014 2018) Financial Report CONTENTS Financial situation by the end of...2 Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received
More informationEnterprise Europe Network SME growth outlook
Enterprise Europe Network SME growth outlook 2018-19 een.ec.europa.eu 2 Enterprise Europe Network SME growth outlook 2018-19 Foreword The European Commission wants to ensure that small and medium-sized
More informationDouble Tax Treaties. Necessity of Declaration on Tax Beneficial Ownership In case of capital gains tax. DTA Country Withholding Tax Rates (%)
Double Tax Treaties DTA Country Withholding Tax Rates (%) Albania 0 0 5/10 1 No No No Armenia 5/10 9 0 5/10 1 Yes 2 No Yes Australia 10 0 15 No No No Austria 0 0 10 No No No Azerbaijan 8 0 8 Yes No Yes
More informationInnovFin SME Guarantee
InnovFin SME Guarantee Implementation Update Reporting date: 30/09/2017 Disclaimer This presentation contains general information about the implementation results of InnovFin SME Guarantee, a facility
More informationBorderline cases for salary, social contribution and tax
Version Abstract 1 (5) 2015-04-21 Veronica Andersson Salary and labour cost statistics Borderline cases for salary, social contribution and tax (Workshop on Labour Cost Survey, Rome, Italy 5-6 May 2015)
More informationCross-border mergers and divisions
Cross-border mergers and divisions Cross-border mergers and divisions Consultation by the European Commission, DG MARKT INTRODUCTION Preliminary Remark The purpose of this questionnaire is to collect information,
More informationEU State aid: Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy making of -
EU State aid: Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 - making of - NHO Seminar Oslo, 5 November 2014 Guido Lobrano, Senior Legal Adviser Summary What is BUSINESSEUROPE?
More informationFinancial situation by the end of Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received by 31 December 2017 (in Euro)...3
European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources (ECPGR) Phase IX (2014 2018) 2017 Financial Report CONTENTS Financial situation by the end of 2017...2 Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase
More informationThe current state of the electricity market in Bulgaria
The current state of the electricity market in Bulgaria Towards market liberalization Current state of the market Generation 42 TWh Export - 18% Losses - 9% Regulated market 33% Domestic free market -
More informationBULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - APRIL 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)
BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - APRIL 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA) In the period January - April 2017 Bulgarian exports to the EU increased by 8.6% 2016 and amounted to 10 418.6 Million BGN
More informationBULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - MAY 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)
BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - MAY 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA) In the period January - May 2017 Bulgarian exports to the EU increased by 10.8% 2016 and added up to 13 283.0 Million BGN (Annex,
More informationEnterprise Europe Network SME growth forecast
Enterprise Europe Network SME growth forecast 2017-18 een.ec.europa.eu Foreword Since we came into office three years ago, this European Commission has put the creation of more jobs and growth at the centre
More informationSlovenia Country Profile
Slovenia Country Profile EU Tax Centre July 2015 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Slovenia EU Member State Double Tax Treaties With: Albania Armenia Austria
More informationEuropean Advertising Business Climate Index Q4 2016/Q #AdIndex2017
European Advertising Business Climate Index Q4 216/Q1 217 ABOUT Quarterly survey of European advertising and market research companies Provides information about: managers assessment of their business
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels,.4.29 COM(28) 86 final/ 2 ANNEXES to 3 ANNEX to the REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE
More informationDEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE
DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE STATISTICS BY REGION 5. EUROPE 6 edition 5.. ODA TO EUROPE - SUMMARY 5... Top ODA receipts by recipient USD million, net disbursements in 5... Trends in ODA Turkey % Ukraine
More informationHow to complete a payment application form (NI)
How to complete a payment application form (NI) This form should be used for making a payment from a Northern Ireland Ulster Bank account. 1. Applicant Details If you are a signal number indemnity holder,
More informationEU-28 RECOVERED PAPER STATISTICS. Mr. Giampiero MAGNAGHI On behalf of EuRIC
EU-28 RECOVERED PAPER STATISTICS Mr. Giampiero MAGNAGHI On behalf of EuRIC CONTENTS EU-28 Paper and Board: Consumption and Production EU-28 Recovered Paper: Effective Consumption and Collection EU-28 -
More informationLive Long and Prosper? Demographic Change and Europe s Pensions Crisis. Dr. Jochen Pimpertz Brussels, 10 November 2015
Live Long and Prosper? Demographic Change and Europe s Pensions Crisis Dr. Jochen Pimpertz Brussels, 10 November 2015 Old-age-dependency ratio, EU28 45,9 49,4 50,2 39,0 27,5 31,8 2013 2020 2030 2040 2050
More informationTAXATION OF TRUSTS IN ISRAEL. An Opportunity For Foreign Residents. Dr. Avi Nov
TAXATION OF TRUSTS IN ISRAEL An Opportunity For Foreign Residents Dr. Avi Nov Short Bio Dr. Avi Nov is an Israeli lawyer who represents taxpayers, individuals and entities. Areas of Practice: Tax Law,
More informationANNEX III FINANCIAL AND CONTRACTUAL RULES
Ref. Ares(2016)3996406-29/07/2016 ANNEX III FINANCIAL AND CONTRACTUAL RULES [In parts II, III and IV of this Annex, the NA has to include only the parts that are relevant for the Key Action and field concerned.
More informationOnline Insurance Europe: BEST PRACTICES & TRENDS
Online Insurance Europe: S & TRENDS NEW EDITION 2015 Your Benefits EUROPE S S & TRENDS: The first and only analysis of the current online insurance best practices in all of Europe. Over 100 best practices,
More informationSummary of key findings
1 VAT/GST treatment of cross-border services: 2017 survey Supplies of e-services to consumers (B2C) (see footnote 1) Supplies of e-services to businesses (B2B) 1(a). Is a non-resident 1(b). If there is
More informationElectricity & Gas Prices in Ireland. Annex Business Electricity Prices per kwh 2 nd Semester (July December) 2016
Electricity & Gas Prices in Ireland Annex Business Electricity Prices per kwh 2 nd Semester (July December) 2016 ENERGY POLICY STATISTICAL SUPPORT UNIT 1 Electricity & Gas Prices in Ireland Annex Business
More informationUsing health spending to achieve fiscal consolidation objectives?
Using health spending to achieve fiscal consolidation objectives? Dr. Tamás Evetovits Senior Health Financing Specialist WHO Regional Office for Europe Outline Let s get the objectives right Dealing with
More informationPublic stakeholder consultation on the Euratom Research and Training Programme
Public stakeholder consultation on the Euratom Research and Training Programme Fields marked with * are mandatory. The Euratom Research and Training Programme 2014-2018 is the European programme for funding
More informationFCCC/SBI/2010/10/Add.1
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Distr.: General 25 August 2010 Original: English Subsidiary Body for Implementation Contents Report of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation on its
More informationEUREKA Programme A European Research Programme. > Not an EU-Programme (but complementarity and co-operation - ERA)
EUREKA EUREKA Programme...... Shaping tomorrow s innovations today EUREKA in glance > 2 A European Research Programme > Not an EU-Programme (but complementarity and co-operation - ERA) > Bottom-up project
More informationPUBLIC PROCUREMENT INDICATORS 2011, Brussels, 5 December 2012
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT INDICATORS 2011, Brussels, 5 December 2012 1. INTRODUCTION This document provides estimates of three indicators of performance in public procurement within the EU. The indicators are
More informationThe way to Eurostars II
EUREKA Inter-institutional Capacity Building & Awarness Workshop The way to Eurostars II Pedro de Sampaio Nunes Head of EUREKA Secretariat Beirut, 11-12 July 2013 Doing business through technology What
More informationReport Penalties and measures imposed under the UCITS Directive in 2016 and 2017
Report Penalties and measures imposed under the Directive in 206 and 207 4 April 209 ESMA34-45-65 4 April 209 ESMA34-45-65 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 2 Background and relevant regulatory
More informationFinancial wealth of private households worldwide
Economic Research Financial wealth of private households worldwide Munich, October 217 Recovery in turbulent times Assets and liabilities of private households worldwide in EUR trillion and annualrate
More informationEU BUDGET AND NATIONAL BUDGETS
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT ON BUDGETARY AFFAIRS EU BUDGET AND NATIONAL BUDGETS 1999-2009 October 2010 INDEX Foreward 3 Table 1. EU and National budgets 1999-2009; EU-27
More informationPerformance of EBRD Private Equity Funds Portfolio Data to 31 st December EBRD 2011, all rights reserved
Performance of EBRD Private Equity Funds Portfolio Data to 31 st December 2010 0 Portfolio Overview 1 EBRD in Private Equity EBRD s portfolio of funds: over 15 years of investing in the asset class 133
More informationFAQs. 1. Event registration. Dear participants,
FAQs Dear participants, We have compiled a catalogue of the most frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify some of the questions that may arise within the framework of the event or its preparation.
More informationLong Term Reform Agenda International Perspective
Long Term Reform Agenda International Perspective Asta Zviniene Sr. Social Protection Specialist Human Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank October 28 th, 2010 We will look
More informationEFPIA Disclosure Code 2016 Disclosures Shire Pharmaceuticals (including Baxalta US Inc.)
EFPIA Disclosure Code 2016 Disclosures Shire Pharmaceuticals (including Baxalta US Inc.) 1 Section 1: Reporting Approach for 2016 Data: On June 3rd, 2016, Shire acquired Baxalta. Due to the complexity
More informationLithuania Country Profile
Lithuania Country Profile EU Tax Centre June 2017 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Lithuania EU Member State Yes Double Tax Treaties With: Armenia Austria Azerbaijan
More informationPerformance of Private Equity Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS
Performance of Private Equity Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS Data to 31 December 26 1 EBRD in Private Equity EBRD s portfolio of funds: 15 years of investing in the asset class Investment
More informationThe Launch of the European Platform of Universities engaged in Energy research (EPUE)
The Launch of the European Platform of Universities engaged in Energy research (EPUE) Ulrich Stimming Technische Universität München HRK Hochschulrektorenkonferenz Informations- und Strategietag 13. 14.
More informationFY18 Campaign Terms. CAMPAIGN AGREEMENT ( Campaign Agreement ) FOR CEE DYNAMICS 365 CSP CAMPAIGN ( Program )
1. PROGRAM OVERVIEW CAMPAIGN AGREEMENT ( Campaign Agreement ) FOR CEE DYNAMICS 365 CSP CAMPAIGN ( Program ) OFFERED BY MIOL (MICROSOFT EOC) ( Microsoft ) and/or OFFERED BY MS Subsidiary ( Microsoft ) Microsoft
More information11 th Economic Trends Survey of the Impact of Economic Downturn
11 th Economic Trends Survey 11 th Economic Trends Survey of the Impact of Economic Downturn 11 th Economic Trends Survey COUNTRY ANSWERS Austria 155 Belgium 133 Bulgaria 192 Croatia 185 Cyprus 1 Czech
More informationANNUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION. of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.2.2017 COM(2017) 67 final ANNUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 EN EN
More informationCoach Plus Breakdown Insurance
1 Coach Plus Breakdown Insurance Specialist cover for UK and Europe Coach Plus Breakdown Annual Multi-trip Insurance 2018 Underwriting Guide - valid from 1st January 2018 Travel must take place within
More informationTHE INVERTING PYRAMID: DEMOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES TO THE PENSION SYSTEMS IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA
THE INVERTING PYRAMID: DEMOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES TO THE PENSION SYSTEMS IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA 1 Anita M. Schwarz Lead Economist Human Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank
More informationTable of Contents. 1 created by
Table of Contents Overview... 2 Exemption Application Instructions for U.S. Tax Residents Living in the U.S.... 3 Exemption Application Instructions for Tax Residents of European Union Member States (other
More informationFiscal rules in Lithuania
Fiscal rules in Lithuania Algimantas Rimkūnas Vice Minister, Ministry of Finance of Lithuania 3 June, 2016 Evolution of National and EU Fiscal Regulations Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) Maastricht Treaty
More informationFINANCIAL PLAN for CONSTRUCTION and EXPLOITATION PHASE
FINANCIAL PLAN for CONSTRUCTION and EXPLOITATION PHASE Deliverable 8S-2.2 June 2011 Editors: Bente Maegaard, Steven Krauwer Contributor: Peter Wittenburg All rights reserved by UCPH on behalf of CLARIN
More informationBTSF FOOD HYGIENE AND FLEXIBILITY. Notification To NCPs
BTSF FOOD HYGIENE AND FLEXIBILITY Notification To NCPs Organisation and implementation of training activities on food hygiene and the flexibility provisions provided in the food hygiene package under the
More informationInformation Leaflet No. 5
Information Leaflet No. 5 REGISTRATION OF EXTERNAL COMPANIES INFORMATION LEAFLET NO. 5 / May 2017 1. INTRODUCTION An external (foreign) limited company registered abroad may establish a branch in the State.
More informationFor further information, please see online or contact
For further information, please see http://ec.europa.eu/research/sme-techweb online or contact Lieve.VanWoensel@ec.europa.eu Sixth Progress Report on participation in the 7 th R&D Framework Programme Statistical
More informationTRADE IN GOODS OF BULGARIA WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - JUNE 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA)
TRADE IN GOODS OF BULGARIA WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - JUNE 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA) In the period January - June 2018 the exports of goods from Bulgaria to the EU increased by 10.7% 2017 and amounted
More informationEntitlement to NHS Hospital Treatment for Non-Resident UK Citizens
Entitlement to NHS Hospital Treatment for Non-Resident UK Citizens Entitlement to Free NHS Hospital Treatment by Non-Resident UK Citizens This leaflet has been compiled to explain the entitlement requirements
More informationThe Architectural Profession in Europe 2012
The Architectural Profession in Europe 2012 - A Sector Study Commissioned by the Architects Council of Europe Chapter 2: Architecture the Market December 2012 2 Architecture - the Market The Construction
More informationACCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND PREVENTION (AIG) DIVISIONAL MEETING (2008)
International Civil Aviation Organization AIG/08-WP/36 5/9/08 WORKING PAPER ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND PREVENTION (AIG) DIVISIONAL MEETING (2008) Montréal, 13 to 18 October 2008 Agenda Item 6: Regional
More informationMacroeconomic scenarios for skill demand and supply projections, including dealing with the recession
Alphametrics (AM) Alphametrics Ltd Macroeconomic scenarios for skill demand and supply projections, including dealing with the recession Paper presented at Skillsnet technical workshop on: Forecasting
More informationSlovakia Country Profile
Slovakia Country Profile EU Tax Centre July 2016 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Slovakia EU Member State Double Tax Treaties Yes With: Australia Austria Belarus
More information2017 Figures summary 1
Annual Press Conference on January 18 th 2018 EIB Group Results 2017 2017 Figures summary 1 European Investment Bank (EIB) financing EUR 69.88 billion signed European Investment Fund (EIF) financing EUR
More informationAPA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 CROATIA
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 CROATIA Managing uncertainty in the new tax environment CROATIA KEY FEATURES Competent authority APA provisions/ guidance Types of APAs available APA acceptance criteria Key
More informationGlobal Assessment of Environmental-Economic Accounting and Supporting Statistics
Global Assessment of Environmental-Economic Accounting and Supporting Statistics Additional analysis Version 3.0 THE SOUTH AFRICA I KNOW, THE HOME I UNDERSTAND Contents Abbreviations and acronyms Figures
More informationMacroeconomic overview SEE and Macedonia
Macroeconomic overview SEE and Macedonia Zoltan Arokszallasi Chief Analyst, Macro & FX/FI Research Erste Group Bank Erste Investors Breakfast, 29 September, Skopje 02. Oktober SEE shows mixed performance
More informationCroatia Country Profile
Croatia Country Profile EU Tax Centre June 2017 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Croatia EU Member State Double Tax Treaties With: Albania Armenia Austria Azerbaijan
More informationNOTE. for the Interparliamentary Meeting of the Committee on Budgets
NOTE for the Interparliamentary Meeting of the Committee on Budgets THE ROLE OF THE EU BUDGET TO SUPPORT MEMBER STATES IN ACHIEVING THEIR ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES AS AGREED WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationName Organisation Date
European Public Leadership Driving Innovation In Construction and Operations Name Organisation Date Construction: declining productivity and low digitalisation Productivity Digitalisation Other non-farm
More informationInformation Leaflet No. 5
Information Leaflet No. 5 REGISTRATION OF EXTERNAL COMPANIES INFORMATION LEAFLET NO. 5 / FEBRUARY 2018 ii 1. INTRODUCTION An external (foreign) limited company registered abroad may establish a branch
More informationICAEW practising certificate guidance notes
ICAEW practising certificate guidance notes WHY WOULD I NEED A PRACTISING CERTIFICATE? You must have a practising certificate if you want to engage in public practice and provide accountancy services to
More informationL 201/58 Official Journal of the European Union
L 201/58 Official Journal of the European Union 30.7.2008 DECISION No 743/2008/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 9 July 2008 on the Community s participation in a research and development
More informationMedicines for Europe (MFE) HCP/HCO/PO Disclosure Transparency Requirements. Samsung Bioepis Methodology Note
Medicines for Europe (MFE) HCP/HCO/PO Disclosure Transparency Requirements Samsung Bioepis Methodology Note 1 Contents 1. Overview of the MFE Requirements 2. Decisions 3. Submission Requirements 4. Categories
More informationPerformance of Private Equity Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS Data to 31 December 2008
Performance of Private Equity Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS Data to 31 December 2008 1 EBRD in Private Equity EBRD s portfolio of funds: over 15 years of investing in the asset class
More informationRaising the retirement age is the labour market ready for active ageing: evidence from EB and Eurofound research
Raising the retirement age is the labour market ready for active ageing: evidence from EB and Eurofound research Robert Anderson, EUROFOUND, Dublin Reforming pension systems in Europe and Central Asia
More informationLatvia Country Profile
Latvia Country Profile EU Tax Centre June 2018 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Latvia EU Member State Double Tax Treaties With: Albania Armenia Austria Azerbaijan
More informationNick THIJS Senior Lecturer European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA)
Nick THIJS Senior Lecturer European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA) Who s EIPA? Europe s leading centre of excellence on European integration and the new challenges for public management. Created
More informationTax Card 2018 Effective from 1 January 2018 The Republic of Estonia
Tax Card 2018 Effective from 1 January 2018 The Republic of Estonia KPMG Baltics OÜ kpmg.com/ee CORPORATE INCOME TAX In Estonia, corporate income tax is not levied when profit is earned but when it is
More informationQuarterly Gross Domestic Product of Montenegro 3 rd quarter 2017
MONTENEGRO STATISTICAL OFFICE R E L E A S E No: 224 Podgorica, 22 December 2017 When using the data, please name the source Quarterly Gross Domestic Product of Montenegro 3 rd quarter 2017 The release
More informationDefining Issues. EU Audit Reforms: The Countdown Begins. April 2016, No Key Facts for U.S. Companies
Defining Issues April 2016, No. 16-12 EU Audit Reforms: The Countdown Begins Only two months remain before the European Union (EU) audit reforms come into full effect. These reforms will affect many U.S.
More informationFSMA_2017_05-01 of 24/02/2017
FSMA_2017_05-01 of 24/02/2017 This Communication is addressed to Belgian alternative investment fund managers who intend to market, to professional investors, units or shares of European Economic Area
More informationThe Global Philanthropy Environment Index 2018
The Global Philanthropy Environment Index 2018 European Edition LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY INDIANA UNIVERSITY OCTOBER, 2018 EUROPE AT A GLANCE The European special edition of the 2018 Global Philanthropy
More informationThe Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN)
2013/ACT/NET/002 Session 1 The Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN) Purpose: Information Submitted by: CARIN Anti-Corruption and Transparency Network Preparatory Meeting Bali, Indonesia 18-19
More informationAPA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 UKRAINE. New paths ahead for international tax controversy
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 UKRAINE New paths ahead for international tax controversy UKRAINE APA PROGRAM KEY FEATURES Competent authority Relevant provisions Types of APAs available Acceptance criteria
More informationFOREWORD. Estonia. Services provided by member firms include:
2016/17 FOREWORD A country's tax regime is always a key factor for any business considering moving into new markets. What is the corporate tax rate? Are there any incentives for overseas businesses? Are
More informationPension Reforms Revisited Asta Zviniene Sr. Social Protection Specialist Human Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank
Pension Reforms Revisited Asta Zviniene Sr. Social Protection Specialist Human Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank All Countries in the Europe and Central Asia Region Have
More informationFinland Country Profile
Finland Country Profile EU Tax Centre July 2016 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Finland EU Member State Double Tax Treaties With: Argentina Armenia Australia
More informationThis document explains the methodology underlying Roche s EFPIA disclosure
This document explains the methodology underlying Roche s EFPIA disclosure It is common in many innovation-led industries for companies to engage independent experts or specialist organizations. Collaborations
More informationDrafting Effective International Contracts: Workshop-seminar on International Sales, Agency and Distributorship Contracts
Drafting Effective International Contracts: Workshop-seminar on International Sales, Agency and Distributorship Contracts Goodwill Indemnity and Similar Rights in Agency and Distributorship Contracts:
More information17th EHFG Electing Health The Europe We Want!
01 03 October 2014 17th EHFG Electing Health The Europe We Want! For more information about the final programme, speakers or the EHFG conference please contact us directly! Follow us on our social media
More information, , , ,00
ConsolidatedBudget KA3 Support for Policy Reform - National Authorities for Apprenticeships Before completing this table please read carefully the instructions available on CALL FOR PROPOSALS EACEA 13/2014
More informationEMPLOYMENT RATE Employed/Working age population (15-64 years)
1 EMPLOYMENT RATE 1980-2003 Employed/Working age population (15-64 years 80 % Finland (Com 75 70 65 60 EU-15 Finland (Stat. Fin. 55 50 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 9.9.2002/SAK /TL Source: European
More informationEN RLMM 2018 Monday 10 & Tuesday 11 September Exeter, UK
Dr Andrew Dean Changing Need for Qualifications, Soft Skills and Competencies: Assessment in Regional Labour Market Monitoring EN RLMM 2018 Monday 10 & Tuesday 11 September Exeter, UK YOUR HOSTS Marchmont
More informationWithholding Tax Rate under DTAA
Withholding Tax Rate under DTAA Country Albania 10% 10% 10% 10% Armenia 10% Australia 15% 15% 10%/15% [Note 2] 10%/15% [Note 2] Austria 10% Bangladesh Belarus a) 10% (if at least 10% of recipient company);
More informationPublic consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility
Contribution ID: 9d8a55f8-5d8e-41d1-b1e9-bb155224c3a4 Date: 07/03/2018 15:16:10 Public consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility Fields marked with * are mandatory. Public consultation
More informationFeatures offered by BU for the Network for inbound parcels - December 2016
Features offered by BU for the Network for inbound parcels - December 2016 Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland (Chronopost) (DPD) Germany
More informationCrowdfunding in the EU
Crowdfunding in the EU Answering this questionnaire will take about 10-15 minutes. You are allowed to skip questions that you cannot, or do not wish to, answer. Please note that you cannot save your answers
More informationVALUE ADDED TAX COMMITTEE (ARTICLE 398 OF DIRECTIVE 2006/112/EC) WORKING PAPER NO 924
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value added tax taxud.c.1(2017)1561748 EN Brussels, 14 March 2017 VALUE ADDED TAX COMMITTEE (ARTICLE
More informationGerry Weber International AG
The German Tax Agency (the BZSt) offers an electronic tax relief program (the DTV) designed to facilitate and accelerate German tax reclaims on equities by financial institutions. Acupay provides custodian
More informationDG TAXUD. STAT/11/100 1 July 2011
DG TAXUD STAT/11/100 1 July 2011 Taxation trends in the European Union Recession drove EU27 overall tax revenue down to 38.4% of GDP in 2009 Half of the Member States hiked the standard rate of VAT since
More informationCyprus New Double Tax Treaties Become Effective
Seize the advantage of our expertise Cyprus New Double Tax Treaties Become Effective Cyprus Double Tax Treaty (DTT) network has been expanded with four new agreements with Lithuania, Norway, Spain and
More information