Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna. CCSBT: Progress with Management of Fishing Capacity / Catch and Allocation

Similar documents
The Extended Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT),

ITLOS_F3_ /3/04 5:37 PM Page 71 REQUEST FOR THE PRESCRIPTION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES SUBMITTED BY AUSTRALIA

COMMISSION FOURTEENTH REGULAR SESSION Manila, Philippines 3 7 December 2017

Voluntary Guidelines for flag State performance

Improving performance in the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing

IOTC-2018-S22-INF01 SUBMITTED BY: EUROPEAN UNION Explanatory Memorandum

Closing the gap: Comparing tuna RFMO port State measures with the FAO Agreement on Port State Measures

Declaration of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly The reform of European fisheries policy and its impact on ACP countries

THE DEFINITION OF IUU FISHING

Estimating the Costs of Quota Share Trading Restrictions in the Alaskan Halibut ITQ Program: Using Linear Programming

Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 May 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW OF THE 2009 FAO AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES 2

PROPOSAL IATTC-93 D-1

Recommendation GFCM/41/2017/7 on a regional plan of action to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in the GFCM area of application

EN Official Journal of the European Union C 324/17

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MARITIME AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES

Cost Recovery in Fisheries Management: The Australian Experience

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Evaluation. Accompanying the document. Recommendation for a

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

The New Member Problem in the Cooperative Management of the Northern Atlantic Bluefin Tuna

By: Richard Banks, Poseidon

COMMISSION ELEVENTH REGULAR SESSION

FISHERIES MEASURES FOR MARINE NATURA 2000 SITES A consistent approach to requests for fisheries management measures under the Common Fisheries Policy

PALAU ARRANGEMENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE WESTERN PACIFIC TUNA FISHERY - MANAGEMENT SCHEME (LONGLINE VESSEL DAY SCHEME) (ADOPTED MARCH 2015)

AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSERVATION OF DOLPHINS

ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT

The Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Twenty-third Session. Hobart, Tasmania February 2010 REVIEW OF FISHERY STATISTICS

Official Journal of the European Union L 85/15

Brexit Paper 23: Fisheries

CMM 2.07 Conservation and Management Measure on Minimum Standards of Inspection in Port

The UK quota system. Chris Williams, New Economics Foundation. Contact:

A Review of Methods for Calculating Contributions in the International Whaling Commission and Other Fisheries Organizations

7 th Annual Meeting of the Commission January, The Hague, The Netherlands

FISHERIES SERVICES CANADA

6 TH MEETING OF THE COMPLIANCE AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE (CTC6) The Hague, The Netherlands, 23 to 27 January 2019

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

LONDON, 12 MARCH 2014

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURE FOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING SCHEME

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR FLAG STATE PERFORMANCE - A NEW TOOL AGAINST IUU FISHING

Agenda Hosting arrangements for WCPFC annual sessions hosted by SIDS

FOURTH MEETING INTERSESSIONAL WORKING GROUP REGIONAL OBSERVER PROGRAMME (IWG-ROP4)

RECRUITMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PNA OFFICE

EU EDF 9 B Scientific Support for Oceanic Fisheries Management in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (SCIFISH)

ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2018 should be no more than tonnes.

Brexit and the Fisheries Bill the Government Perspective. Jo Anderson Fisheries Bill and Engagement

2018 COM Doc. No. COC-323 / 2018 November 12, 2018 (5:35 PM)

International treaty examination of the Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

PROPOSAL IATTC-87 C-1B

SCRS Report 2018 PLENARY. Secretariat activities in research and statistics

RBM in the EU. Gothenburg 14 April Erik Lindebo Senior Consultant, Environmental Defense Fund Europe

2nd Meeting of the Compliance & Technical Committee Auckland, New Zealand: January 2015

(New York, April 2007) Report SUMMARY

Initial Report of the Monkfish Plan Development Team. to the New England Fishery Management Council s Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC)

Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

The implementation of Integrated Fisheries Management in Western Australia. Greg Paust and Kevin Donohue

APPENDIX 4 TO ANNEX XI REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 4.11 RESERVATIONS BY THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY. All sectors

Biological data collection for fisheries on highly migratory species

Grouper-Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program 5-year Review

SUPPORTING THE TAC/QUOTA SYSTEM. Brief analysis of the failings in the establishment, application and control of the TAC system

The Implications of Brexit for Fisheries in the North Sea

Assume we know: the growth curve for biomass and the behaviour of individuals in the industry.

EC REGULATION 1005/2008 TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED (IUU) FISHING INFORMATION NOTE

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

The reform of the Common Fisheries Policy

5556/09 AK/SC/mm DG E II

2017 FINANCIAL REPORT 1

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EX-ANTE EVALUATION

EU access agreements and the combat against IUU fishing

Port State Measures and Port Inspection

UK and Norway after the Common Fisheries Policy BARRIE DEAS NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN S ORGANISATIONS

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Advice June 2014

FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1074

FISHERIES SERVICES SPAIN

3.3.9 Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

FISHERIES INTERCOM GROUP EU Common Fisheries Policy Reform & New Agenda for EU Aquaculture. SAINT-MALO 25 September 2013

Official Journal of the European Union L 60/1 REGULATIONS

Advice September Herring in Subareas I, II, and V, and in Divisions IVa and XIVa (Norwegian spring-spawning herring).

Building a Sustainable Future for Ireland s Fishing Fleet

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Baltic Sea and Greater North Sea Ecoregions Published 20 November 2015

Coordination effects in area-specific management regimes -

The relationship between the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and ICCAT recommendation 09-06: implications for ICCAT negotiations

Executive Summary 1. IUU fishing has important economic, environmental and social effects

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

Response to the Commission s proposal for a multi-annual plan for the North Sea COM (2016) 493 Final 27th of September 2016

FINAL REPORT. Measurement data and analysis. as specified in the specific contracts 5&6 on Modules 3&4. under the Framework Contract n ENTR/06/61

( ) Page: 1/39 FISHERIES SUBSIDIES COMPILATION MATRIX OF TEXTUAL PROPOSALS RECEIVED TO DATE INTRODUCTION BY THE CHAIR

Fisheries & Food (SAGPyA)

INTERIM AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A FRAMEWORK FOR AN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA STATES ON THE ONE PART AND

Issues and Options for Disciplines on Subsidies to Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing

SUBMISSION TO PRIMARY PRODUCTION SELECT COMMITTEE FISHERIES (FOREIGN CHARTER VESSELS AND OTHER MATTERS) AMENDMENT BILL

A Simple Buyback Auction for Fisheries Management. Ted Groves, UCSD John Ledyard, Caltech

Joint NGO recommendations for 2018 total allowable catches

NEA(05) An opening statement was made on behalf of the Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) attending the Annual Meeting (Annex 1).

Cod (Gadus morhua) in subareas 1 and 2 (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

Transcription:

Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna CCSBT: Progress with Management of Fishing Capacity / Catch and Allocation Brisbane, Australia 29 June to 1 July, 2010

Management of Fishing Capacity and Catch CCSBT s primary conservation measure is the setting and allocation of a Total Allowable Catch (TAC) for SBT. o All Members and CNMs have been granted an allocation of the TAC. o Non-cooperating non-members do not have an allocation and are discouraged from fishing for SBT by being denied access to SBT markets of Members and CNMs. CCSBT has not managed fishing capacity directly. Instead: o Individual Members & CNMs decide how much fishing capacity is appropriate for their allocation of the TAC. 5 Members have individual quota systems for SBT fishing. Some have ITQ systems. Some have undertaken capacity reduction programs. The remaining Member and the 3 CNMs take SBT as a bycatch. There has been a reduction in the size of the main SBT fleets over the last 6 years.

Number of Vessels >100t Authorised to Fish for SBT 900 800 700 600 500 Post-2004 Members/CNMs 400 300 Pre-2004 Members/CNMs 200 100 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

16000 Global Total Allowable Catch of SBT 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Decisions taken for future management of the catch To be based on a Management Procedure (Decision Rule): The CCSBT Management Procedure (MP) is scheduled to be finalised in 2010. An emergency rule will be developed as part of the MP for exceptional circumstances such as recruitment lower than historically low levels. The MP is scheduled to be implemented in 2011 and be the basis for TAC setting for 2012 and beyond. In the event that an MP cannot be finalised by 2012, a reduction in the TAC for 2012 to 5,000t - 6,000t has been agreed unless CCSBT decides otherwise based upon the new stock assessment.

Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Appropriate MCS measures at both the RFMO and national levels are essential to quantify and control the catch for TAC based management. The CCSBT has implemented: o a Comprehensive CDS, o Monitoring transhipments at sea, o VMS requirements, o Monthly catch reporting, o requirements to develop Compliance Action Plans. CCSBT is also in the process of conducting a compliance risk assessment.

Allocation of the TAC the Convention The CCSBT s Convention specifies six matters to be considered when deciding upon allocations: o Relevant scientific evidence. o The need for orderly and sustainable development of southern bluefin tuna fisheries. o The interests of Parties through whose exclusive economic or fishery zones southern bluefin tuna migrates. o The interests of Parties whose vessels engage in fishing for southern bluefin tuna including those which have historically engaged in such fishing and those which have southern bluefin tuna fisheries under development. o The contribution of each Party to conservation and enhancement of, and scientific research on, southern bluefin tuna. o Any other factors which the Commission deems appropriate.

Allocation of the TAC in practice CCSBT informally considers allocation matters specified in the convention, but it has not developed a formal procedure for determining the size of allocations. In practise: o Allocations for new entrants have been determined through negotiation and taking into account recent past catches and individual circumstances. o Setting of subsequent allocations for Members and CNMs has to a large degree been established with respect to previous allocations, but also with negotiation depending on circumstances at the time. o Decisions on allocations to CNMs are reviewed on an annual basis. o Since 2006, the TAC and allocations to Members have been for a 2 or 3 year period (but subject to exceptional circumstances such as declining stock status).

Allocation of the TAC recent developments From 2006, the allocation to Members has evolved into 3 tiers of allocation. This has provided some flexibility for allocation decisions. o Nominal Catch Limit: Long-term allocation before any reductions are applied and is used in determining the financial contributions to the CCSBT. o Allocated Catch Limit: The reduced catch allocated for a specific period. This is not necessarily in proportion to the nominal catch. o Effective Catch Limit: Allocated catch minus any additional agreed voluntary reductions for a specific period. In October 2009, a long-standing allocation issue (since CCSBT 1-1994) was finally resolved, resulting in changes to 3 Member s Nominal Catch Limit. The CCSBT has agreed to start discussion on quota allocation rules which may be used from 2012.

Proportional "Effective" Allocations of the TAC 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna In Summary CCSBT manages the SBT catch primarily through a global TAC and allocations of that TAC instead of direct limitations on fishing capacity. The Global TAC for SBT has been reduced twice since 2004 due to serious concerns with the state of the stock. The number of authorised fishing vessels has also declined. An MP is planned to be the basis for future setting of the TAC. There are no formal procedures for allocation of the TAC, but the Convention specifies matters that must be considered. Catch history and past allocations have had a significant influence on allocation decisions, but individual circumstances have also been taken into account. Discussion on quota allocation rules which may be used from 2012 is scheduled to commence in 2010.