Public-Private. League of Women Voters. Nick Farber, Operations Manager, High Performance Transportation Enterprise. April 3, 2018

Similar documents
Public-Private Partnerships 101

Public Private Partnerships 101

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM

P3: OPPORTUNITIES FOR AMERICA S INFRASTRUCTURE. Greg Hummel

Finance Tools for Project Advancement

Overview of Highway Public-Private Partnerships (P3s)

P3 CONTRACTS. Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. November 2016

Managed Lanes: Transaction Strategies from the PPP Forefront

THE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ( OTP3 )

AVAILABILITY PAYMENTS What Can We Learn from Surface Transportation Projects? Pamela Bailey Campbell President, LeighFisher

Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Private Financing for Port Infrastructure

The Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships

I-77 Managed Lanes Project Project Update. Ned Curran & Louis Mitchell September 2014

Florida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3)

AGENDA ITEM #9 SUMMARY

The Comparative Benefits of Revenue Risk vs. Availability Payment P3s

Fredric W. Kessler, Esq.

An Overview of P3s in Maryland

Irvine Corona Expressway Project Financing Review

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016

Colorado Trans II Referendum Survey. April 8 th - 9 th, 2015

Our current fiscal challenge

MAJOR BUSINESS TERMS FOR THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DBFOM DELIVERY METHOD

A P3 Success Story RTD s EAGLE P3 Project

Partnerships in Transportation Workshop Transportation PPPs beyond Toll Roads

Solutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co. April 22, 2008

Countywide Dialogue on Transportation

Public Private Partnerships. Virginia GFOA s 2015 Fall Conference. prepared for. by JoAnne Carter, Managing Director.

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

THE COLORADO WAY. How Your Vote Can Create Widespread Economic Prosperity

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009

Model Concession Agreement for Highways: An Overview

47th Annual Workshop on Transportation Law

Public Private Partnerships What is That??? Raymond Partridge, Program Manager July 17, 2013

Description of the Submission / Conditions Precedent

Long-Term Projection of Traffic and Revenues for Equity Analysis

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

70 th Annual Meeting CSG WEST August 18 th, 2017

University Link LRT Extension

Public-Private Partnerships (P3)

Minnesota Smart Transportation:

The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States

Public-Private Partnerships and Innovative Finance

Honolulu Rail Transit Project

I-66 RFI Response Vinci Concessions USA 25 November 2013

Public-Private Partnerships for Transit

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS P3. N&C Consulting Government Procurement & Compliance

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB3202 Project Name. Kenya Nairobi Urban Toll Road PRG Region

Renegotiations & Bankruptcies in U.S. surface transportation P3s

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1049

I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

The Potential for Financing the Jefferson Parkway Using Toll Revenue

Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act

FY2011 Budget Forum. District of Columbia. October 19, 2009

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS What? Why? Who? How? Where? and Here. I-77 HOT Lanes P3 Project. Lake Norman Transportation Summit March 13, 2013

Overview of the framework

Emerging Trends in Port Infrastructure: Using P3s to Maximize Value

DRAFT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT UNDER THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1995 (AS AMENDED)

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2800 CHAPTER... AN ACT

Introduction to Alternative Procurement Delivery

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

An Introduction to PPP s

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation. North Carolina Turnpike Authority Beau Memory March 14, 2017

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011

Bringing Virginia s Transportation Funding Up to Speed. August 25, 2014 John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Sheppard Subway Extensions

Review of FasTracks Status and Future Strategic Direction

MAJOR BUSINESS TERMS I-64 HAMPTON ROADS BRIDGE-TUNNEL EXPANSION PROJECT IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. March 14, 2019

F = MA : CSG SLC WEBINAR DECEMBER 16, J. Douglas Koelemay, Director

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

MPACT64. Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado. We Can t Afford to Wait

Review of 91 Toll Road Funding

Best Practice in National Support for Urban Transportation

The Annual William O. Lipinski i Symposium on Transportation Policy

Appendix D: USING TOLL REVENUE TO FINANCE HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

THE USE OF FEDERAL INNOVATIVE FINANCE TECHNIQUES IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL BELTWAY BY MARTIN J. LUBY

Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses

Infrastructure Financing and Ratings. Cherian George Florida Transportation Commission Cape Canaveral

Public Private Partnerships

New Hampshire Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Good Roads for Less Money

SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS & DEBT SCHEDULES

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: HIGHWAY P3S

Availability Payment or Revenue-Risk P3 Concessions? Pros and Cons for Highway Infrastructure

ATTACHMENT 2. Purpose. To provide guidance on proposed policy for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes. Action

Purpose. 2 Third Crossing Business Plan

St. Croix River Crossing Project: Innovative Financing Study. January 2011

To P3 or Not to P3 By JohN Gross

of the ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS regarding an AIRPORT-TO-INTERNATIONAL DRIVE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM Resolution No.

Agenda Item No. 6d January 27, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, Interim City Manager

SH 249 EXTENSION PROJECT DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TERM SHEET DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

Florida Department of Transportation

BALANCED CONCESSIONS FOR THE AIRPORT INDUSTRY DELIVERING WIN-WIN OUTCOMES FOR SUCCESSFUL AIRPORT CONCESSION CONTRACTS

Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses

JP Morgan Public Finance Transportation Utility Conference

Transcription:

-Private Partnerships 101 League of Women Voters Nick Farber, Operations Manager, High Performance Transportation Enterprise April 3, 2018

What is Driving the Need? Continued Growth 1991 2015 2040 3.3 million 5.4 million 7.8 million 27.7 billion vehicles miles traveled 50.5 billion vehicle miles traveled 72.3 billion vehicle miles traveled All dollar figures adjusted for inflation 2

What is Driving the Need? No Increase in Gas Tax 1991 $1.14/gal. AverageGasPrice Avalanchelogo Denver s Stapleton airport 4 years away from closing $15,473 AveragePriceofa NewCar President GeorgeH.W.Bush $109,071 MetroDenverMedian HomePrice Dan Reeves was Broncos head coach with John Elway as Quarterback and Gary Kubiak asbackupqb 3 Terminator2 released Broncoslogo

CDOT s Budget: Focus on Maintaining the System $800,000,000 $700,000,000 $600,000,000 Significant $500,000,000 Focus on Maintenance $400,000,000 Generally No $300,000,000 New Funds for New Capacity* $200,000,000 $100,000,000 $- 4 4

Required to aggressively pursue innovative means of more efficiently financing important transportation projects: - Private Partnerships -Operating concession agreements -User fee-based project financing (tolls) -Annual performance payment agreements Exists to make Coloradans commutes better 5

What are -Private Partnerships? -private partnerships (P3s) are contractual agreements formed between a public agency and a private sector entity that allow for greater private sector participation in the delivery and financing of transportation projects (FHWA) 6

Private Partnerships 7

WHY use P3 to deliver a project? Project Acceleration Risk Allocation Engineering Innovation Life Cycle Costs/ Value For Money Many types of P3 Toll/revenue risk DBFOM DBM Revenue share? Risks and Roles are transferred Not designing a project, but establishing performance standards for design Not engineering a project, but creating performance standards for engineering Not plowing the highway, but creating performance standards for plowing 8

Types of P3: Availability Developer responsible for design, construction, operation, maintenance and financing In return, Govt provides Payment for the initial design and construction work typical to a DB contract; and For ongoing operations and maintenance, Govt provides availability payments Concept of availability payments derived from Developer being required to have the facility available Often used in transit projects and other projects where transfer of revenue risk may not be the best value for money

Types of P3: Concession Like Availability, Developer responsible for design, construction, operation, maintenance and financing Unlike Availability, Developer in Concession receives funds actually received and bears risk from traffic and revenue perspectives Notwithstanding risk allocation, Govt typically provides firm amount of parameters for operations Govt has opportunity to benefit from excess revenues

How to Define Risks in P3s Risk is an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive or negative effect on at least one project variable: Planning / Environmental Political will Schedule Project or Program Development Financing Design/Engineering/Construction O&M Revenue Changes in Law Change in Market Conditions Termination

How to Define Risks in P3s Risk DBB DB DBFOM Change in Scope Environment Permits Shared Private ROW Shared Utilities Shared Shared Design Private Private Ground Conditions Private Hazmat Shared Construction Private Private Private QA / QC Shared Private Final Acceptance Private Private O&M Private Financing Private Force Majeure Shared Shared

Why P3s Are Attractive Options Value for Money Risks Retained by Sector Project Costs Operations & Maintenance Costs Financing Costs Capital Costs Delivery Risks Retained by Sector Operations & Maintenance Costs Financing Costs Capital Costs Private Delivery

Protecting the What about the risk to the public? What controls are there for fares or tolls? Do we want private entities getting excessive financial returns? How do we address poor service delivery? What happens if a Developer goes bankrupt? So the Developer defaults, how can we terminate and what is the result? What does the public get back when a P3 contract is over?

Protecting the How do we police excessive returns? Competitive process brings the process to the market Prevents one-off instances where a Developer can receive a super profit since competitive market requires Developers to fight for being awarded the project Parameters are the same for all bidders Capping the upside? Revenue sharing

Protecting the How do we address poor service delivery? Structure escalation of remedies upon defaults Performance monitoring Step-in and self-help rights

Protecting the What happens in the event of insolvency? Commercial debt markets are incentivized to assist and keep the project moving forward Ownership typically remains with the Govt even in full Concession structures Sub-contract direct agreements provide maximum continuity for construction and operations

Protecting the What are termination rights? Ultimate right by either Developer or Govt in the event of sustained failures or even one-time material failures to the project Govt still maintains ownership of assets

Protecting the What happens when the P3 term is over? The parties agree at outset to delivery obligations Process starts years (even a decade or more for some) to ensure compliance can and will occur

ANALYZING CORRIDORS When CDOT asks HPTE to explore possible financing, HPTE will: Examine cost (construction + lifecycle) data, potential revenues Provide matrix of risks and identify best value Consider what possible risks to transfer: Toll revenues? Long-term annual and capital maintenance costs? Ongoing operations? Innovation of design, construction schedule and scope potential? 20

Safeguards to the When considering private investment, CDOT: Decides what project to build Decides how much money is available and for how long Outlines expectations for the project Retains oversight rights Maintains ownership of the highway Protects against private company bankruptcy or other defaults 21

HPTE Commitment to Engagement and Transparency HPTE Transparency and Outreach: HPTE Transparency Policy Executive Order D14-010 US 36 Audit Recommendations Transparency and Involvement Minimum of three Town Hall Meetings for the public Coordinate with local governments Held to maximize the public s convenience Legislative and public reporting requirements Explicit recognition of transit consideration 22

P3s Are Working in Colorado INSERT US36 PHASE II PHOTO HERE

What s Next for HPTE? Parking Facilities Road X Hyperloop Digital Communication Networks? Land/Right of Way Development? Tunnel Lighting? In-Road EV Charging? Employee Housing? Airports?

Opportunities Challenges

CHOICE NEW CDOT STRATEGY Reduce delay on most seriously congested corridors Use toll pricing to manage congestion Maintain reliable travel times now and in the future Promote transit and carpooling (where viable) Always offered along free general purpose lane 26