Page 2 of 5 Options Attachments None 1. Do not transition the programs to CCTA and provide direction back to TRANSPAC. Changes from Committee Backgrou

Similar documents
Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: July 20, 2016 Subject Summary of Issues Recommendations Approval of FY Transp

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT March 4, 2015 Page 2 of 2 reduce motor vehicle emissions. The funds are generated by a $4 vehicle r

4.A.14-2

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT March 1, 2018 Page 2 of 9 Below is a summary of the FY adopted budget and the proposed midy

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 3 Background Consistent with the Measure J Expenditure Plan, the proposed allocation is calcula

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT October 6, 2016 Page 2 of 4 Attachments (Attachment A, handout at APC meeting replaced Attachment A

Introduction Project Overview How Express Lanes Work 101 Managed Lane Financial Forecast Performance Comparison Ownership Considerations Transit

Page 2 of 9 project costs are included in the budget consistent with the adopted Measure C and Measure J Strategic Plans. Below is a summary of the FY

Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance & Improvement Funds for Fiscal Years and

Memorandum. Date: June 14, 2018 To: From:

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Expenditure Plan and directed Air District staff to enter into a funding agreement with the A

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Previous Central County Program 20a fund allocations helped advance transportation programs p

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Committee a comparison between the old and new guidelines for Authority reference. Background

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AUDITING SERVICES. RFP No

Financial Feasibility of Contra Costa County Ferry Service,

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. June 30, 2008

INVEST Demonstration. Demonstration of the FHWA/FTA INVEST Assessment Tool. Robin Mayhew, AICP October 16, 2014

The Potential for Shared Use Mobility in Affordable Housing Complexes in Rural California

Public Transportation

CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT AUTHORITY CONCORD, CALIFORNIA BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16

B. Resolution P Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT October 1, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Changes from Committee Background MTC committed a

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

FY and FY Draft Budget Operations Committee January 24, 2017

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)

DEVELOPING YOUR ANNUAL TRIP REDUCTION PLAN. Transportation Coordinator Association webinar December 7, 2011

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT April 5, 2017 Page 2 of 2 funds that are being applied toward implementation of the Authority s Priority Development A

Draft TransAction Plan: Overview and Findings. Keith Jasper, NVTA July 10, 2017

THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 14 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF

Metro. Receive and File the analysis of the elimination of the monthly FasTrak account maintenance fee.

Ad Hoc Financial Stability Committee MINUTES

MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA

EXHIBIT 10-I NOTICE TO PROPOSERS DBE INFORMATION

CMAQ COST-EFFECTIVENESS THRESHOLD DOCUMENTATION FOR THE STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 2011 FTIP

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent.

CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT AUTHORITY CONCORD, CALIFORNIA BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT JUNE 30, 2015

MTC OVERVIEW OF SB 1 (BEALL AND FRAZIER)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA

ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

BART s Business Model

Draft TransAction Plan: Overview and Findings. Martin E. Nohe, Chairman July 13, 2017

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: Management Letter for the Financial Statements Audit July 1, 2002, Through June 30, 2003

CHICAGO TITLE BAY AREA ZONE 4 RESIDENTIAL (1-4) SCHEDULE OF TITLE & ESCROW FEES. For use in the following counties:

MEMORANDUM. Attachment 4 CITY COUNCIL DAN BUCKSHI, CITY MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 15, 2019

Arlington Transportation Demand Managment Strategic Plan FY FY2040

Agenda Item No. 6d January 27, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, Interim City Manager

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

To: Board of Directors Date: December 21, 2017

Draft West Los Angeles Transportation Improvement and Mitigation Specific Plan

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FISCAL POLICY

AGENDA DATE: April 17, 2019 ITEM NO. 12. SUBJECT: Consider Action to Increase the Compensation of Zone 7 Board Members

Introduction of the 2019 Proposed Budget December 4, 2018

Downtown Syracuse Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Study. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) FY Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan OUTLINE OF DRAFT PLAN

Public Transportation

Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities INFORMATION ITEM. DATE: July 12, 2018

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22,

VICTOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY) BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016

TRAVEL, CONFERENCE, TRAINING AND BUSINESS EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICY

Parking Cash Out. Transportation Solutions Workshop Series April 19, 2017

Citizens Advisory Committee April 24, 2013

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Public Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

TRANSPORTATION 138 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $4,660, % of Community Development

Measure B Expenditures Across All Programs FY Report Card

CONGRESS OKAYS CASH OUT

Memorandum. Agenda Item 2. TO: Conunission. DA TE: December 8, FR: Executive Director. RE: Regional Measure 3. Background

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN S FINAL SALES TAX RENEWAL EXPENDITURE PLAN

Approval of Bus Advertising Service Contract with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Christy Wegener, Director of Planning and Operations

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT May 3, 2017 Page 2 of 5 previous (2013) RTP. Furthermore, the region is expected to create 820,000 new housing units,

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS

MONEY ON THE TABLE EXPANDING TRANSIT BENEFITS CITYWIDE A REPORT BY THE RIDERS ALLIANCE. Principal Author: Benjamin Lowe

TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

Successor Agency to Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency

FUNDING SOURCES Restricted vs. Un-Restricted Funding Sources Fund Balances and Projected Funding Availability IBank Loan

Additionally, the UPWP serves as a source for the following information:

Regional Transportation Plan Checklist (Revised February 2010)

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

TRANSIT LIFE CYCLE POLICIES

Chapter 6. Transportation Planning and Programming. Chapter 6

D. Smith. san josé evergreen COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM CTR Efficiency Act Implementation FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

DRCOG is local officials working together to address the region's challenges for today and tomorrow. Metro Vision 2040

Subject: Creation of an Eco Pass

In their own words. From the Orange County Transportation Authority:

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SFY 2015 Annual Report

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY S EMPLOYMENT AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT S AUTO LOAN PROGRAM: KEEPING EMPLOYMENT EQUALS YOUR SUCCESS (KEYS)

Measure B Expenditures Across All Programs FY Report Card

Transcription:

Meeting Date: Subject Summary of Issues Recommendations Financial Implications Approve Transition of Central and East County 511 Contra Costa and Safe Transportation for Children Program Oversight to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority TRANSPAC has requested to transition the oversight of the Central and East County Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Central County Measure J Safe Transportation for Children (STFC) programs to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority). Authority staff is proposing that the Authority contract the programs to its existing project management consultant to ensure a fast and seamless transition of existing programs. The Authority would provide oversight of the program through the contract. The development of a TDM strategic plan is also proposed to ensure the program continues to meet its goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles travelled. 1. Authorize the transition of the Central and East County Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Central County Safe Transportation For Children (STFC) Programs to CCTA. 2. Authorize Authority staff to negotiate a contract amendment and revision to the scope of work with its existing project management consultant, Stantec to deliver the TDM and STFC programs in Central and East County. 3. Authorize Authority staff to work with the City of Pleasant Hill to, either by amendment or termination, discharge existing agreements 17PH.14 and 16PH.TDM to release any unspent allocations back to CCTA. Funding for the program comes from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) and Central County Measure J Safe Transportation for Children Program. These funds would need to be reallocated from the City of Pleasant Hill to the Authority to provide this program. The funding for this program exists in the proposed FY 2016-17 draft budget. 10-1

Page 2 of 5 Options Attachments None 1. Do not transition the programs to CCTA and provide direction back to TRANSPAC. Changes from Committee Background 511 Contra Costa (511CC) provides TDM service and support to jurisdictions and residents who live and work in Contra Costa County. Funding is provided by the Authority to support the 511CC program using three primary funding sources: Transportation Fund for Clean Air (Bay Area Air Quality Management District), Measure J (Program 17 Commute Alternatives), and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (Metropolitan Transportation Commission). Funds are managed by three separate agreements with three separate offices that provide the 511CC program. The graphic below shows the general structure of the program. Funding Provider CCTA 511 Contra Costa WCCTAC City of Pleasant Hill City of San Ramon Estimated FY 2016-17 Funding Levels TDM West TFCA $318,701 MJ $185,005 MTC $15,890 TOTAL $519,596 TDM Central TFCA454,886 MJ $264,060 MTC $22,680 TOTAL $741,626 STFC Central MJ $425,000 TOTAL $425,000 TDM East TFCA $346,780 MJ $201,305 MTC $17,290 TOTAL $565,375 TDM TFCA $283,602 MJ $164,630 MTC $14,140 TOTAL $462,372 511CC Office Service Area West County Central County Central County East County Southwest County 10-2

Page 3 of 5 Currently, on an annual basis, the Authority enters into funding agreements with three entities to provide the 511CC program West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC), the City of Pleasant Hill and the City of San Ramon. WCCTAC provides TDM services to the residents, employers and jurisdictions in West County. The WCCTAC office also administers the Guaranteed Ride Home program for the entire county. For the City of Pleasant Hill, specific staff provides TDM services to the residents, employers and jurisdictions in both Central County and East County; they also provide the carpool and transit incentive program for the entire county. In addition to TDM functions, the Pleasant Hill office also has staff dedicated to administering the Central County Safe Transportation for Children (STFC) program through separate Measure J Program 21 sub-regional funds. These City employees work out of an office separate from other City offices. The last agreement is with the City of San Ramon to provide TDM services to the residents, employers and jurisdictions in the Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT) area including the San Ramon Valley and Lamorinda jurisdictions. This office also administers the vanpool program for the entire county. In the case of the Pleasant Hill and San Ramon agreements, they provide both employees and fiscal oversight while project selection, programming and budget development are done through TRANSPAC and SWAT, respectively. Recent staffing changes including the retirements of TRANSPAC Executive Director and the TDM Program Director left TRANSPAC with options regarding decisions on how the TDM program could be delivered in the future. Based on this, TRANSPAC has asked CCTA to look at options for restructuring the program as it is related to both TRANSPAC and TRANSPLAN so that TRANSPAC would no longer provide direct oversight of the TDM program in those sub-regions. Because many of the programs provided require several months of advanced planning and bookings, a seamless transition that takes into account the ongoing nature of program delivery is important. The current TDM/STFC programs pertaining to Central and East County have seven dedicated staff employed by the City of Pleasant Hill - four full time receiving full benefits, and three part-time with no benefits. One of the full time staff is dedicated to the STFC program and one is dedicated to TDM. Two of the part time staff are dedicated to the STFC program. The balance of the staff provides service to both programs. 10-3

Page 4 of 5 Options Considered In an effort to consider different program delivery models, Authority staff looked at the following options: Option 1 No Change In this option the program would stay within the City of Pleasant Hill and the employees would be subject to employment decisions by the City. The Authority would continue to contract with the City for the project management of various TDM and STFC programs provided to Central and East County jurisdictions. TRANSPAC has indicated this is not a preferred option. Option 2 Transition some or all of the existing staff to the Authority / Contract some program tasks to a consultant. In this option the Authority would hire all or part of the current staff and take over the program for Central and East County. Authority staff has concerns in three areas with this option. First it doesn t make sense for the Authority to run only two sub-regional programs rather than the entire county; second absorbing staff into the Authority could have significant financial impacts on current and future pension costs paid by the Authority; lastly, there is currently no room in the Authority offices for more staff and splitting the staff into different office locations is neither desirable nor efficient. Because of these reasons this option is also not preferred. Option 3 The Authority contracts delivery of the entire program to a consultant. This option would shift program tasks currently being delivered by city staff to the Authority for contracting to its project management consultant, Stantec. In initial discussions with Stantec they are motivated to take on the work and build the program beyond its current status. Stantec has some TDM experience on the Treasure Island Development Project and has indicated that they would likely hire current staff as appropriate to maintain an existing level of service and program continuity. With Stantec currently under contract with the Authority staff believes a transition can be made with the least program delivery impacts with the current program budget. This option is the recommended option for consideration. On October 8, 2015, TRANSPAC took action requesting that the City of Pleasant Hill enter into a cooperative agreement with the Authority to deliver the FY 2016-17 TDM and STFC program for Central and East County. On May 12, 2016, TRANSPAC rescinded 10-4

Page 5 of 5 that action indicating that they no longer wanted to provide program oversight and indicated a request for the Authority to take over that role. With this recommendation from TRANSPAC, the Authority does not anticipate entering into an agreement with the City of Pleasant Hill for the FY 2016-17 TDM/STFC program. There are currently two open cooperative agreements with the City; agreement 17PH.14 is from FY 2013-14 and has an unspent allocation available in the amount of $770,342 in Measure J STFC funds. All TDM funds in the agreement have been expended. A second open agreement is from last fiscal year, 16PH.TDM. This agreement has $1,873,389 allocated funding in TFCA, Measure J Commute Alternative and Measure J STFC. If the Authority authorizes the transition of the program to the Authority these two cooperative agreements will need to be closed and the unspent allocations made available to the Authority to support the TDM/STFC program. Development of a Contra Costa TDM Strategic Plan Authority staff and staff from the three 511CC offices have been working on developing a scope of work for the development of a Contra Costa Transportation Demand Management Strategic Plan. The strategic plan would look at developing performance objectives for TDM projects and programs and evaluate the existing program in meeting those objectives. In addition to the program elements, the strategic plan would make recommendations for most effective delivery method of the TDM strategy. The current programs have been in operation for many years and it is likely some have run their course with respect to how effective they remain in facilitating mode shift. Staff believes that emerging technologies and innovative transportation delivery options could have a substantially positive effect on greenhouse gas reductions and vehicle miles travelled. These innovations will not only make modal choice more efficient and real time which is good for the traveller but will also improve the ability to monitor and evaluate actual data generated in real time to better evaluate services. The process by which the program markets itself will also change significantly with these new technologies. The 511CC group anticipates bringing a proposed Scope of Work for the Strategic Plan to the Authority for approval in late summer. Recommendations Staff recommends implementing Option 3, which transitions 511CC to CCTA with program delivery by consultant. 10-5

This Page Intentionally Blank