Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research

Similar documents
Summary: Windsor, Connecticut; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research. March 12,

Summary: San Benito, Texas; General Obligation

Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation

April 10,

28 ИЮНЯ 2012 Г. 1

Linden-Kildare Consolidated Independent School District, Texas; General Obligation

Summary: San Mateo County Community College District, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents

Shenandoah, Texas; General Obligation

Apex Town, North Carolina; General Obligation

Burlington, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Hartford County Metropolitan District, Connecticut; General Obligation

Springfield, Michigan; General Obligation

Canton, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Wicomico County, Maryland; General Obligation

PPPs, Contingent Liabilities And Sovereign s Credit Quality

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Southern California Metropolitan Water District; General Obligation; Water/Sewer

Parker Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

Frederick City, Maryland; General Obligation

Navigators International Insurance Co. Ltd. Assigned 'A' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Bay City, Michigan; General Obligation

Chicago Board of Education; General Obligation

Montebello Public Financing Authority Montebello, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; General Obligation

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Puerto Rico; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security

Research Update: Grupo de Inversiones Suramericana S.A. 'BBB-' Ratings Affirmed, Off CreditWatch On Successful Capitalization Plan.

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

Summary: Fresno, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Lyndhurst Township, New Jersey; General Obligation

Jacksonville, Florida; General Obligation; Miscellaneous Tax

Albany County Airport Authority, New York Albany International Airport; Airport

St. Marys County, Maryland; General Obligation

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

City of Windsor 'AA' Ratings Affirmed On Low Debt Burden And Exceptional Liquidity; Outlook Stable

Illinois Finance Authority Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group; Joint Criteria; System

Mound, MInnesota; General Obligation

Bristol, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Sovereign Rating Trends In Central America

Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

City of Winnipeg 'AA' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Interactive Brokers LLC

U.K.-Based Housing Association Notting Hill Home Ownership Assigned 'AA' Rating; Outlook Stable

Three Euler Hermes Companies Upgraded To 'AA' From 'AA-' Due To Revised Status Within The Allianz Group; Outlook Stable

Research Update: Kingdom of Belgium Outlook Revised To Negative On Political Deadlock; 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed.

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. Upgraded To 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

S&P's Views Of GASB's Proposed Changes In Government Pension Accounting

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax

Standard & Poor s Presentation Virginia GFOA

Oak Park Village, Illinois; General Obligation

Brightwaters Village, New York; General Obligation

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, Oregon; Miscellaneous Tax

Stonington, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Gabriel Petek, CFA Managing Director U.S. Public Finance Copyright 2016 by S&P Global. All rights reserved.

Providence Water Supply Board, Rhode Island; Water/Sewer

Petroleos Mexicanos, Its Subsidiaries, And Comision Federal de Electricidad Outlooks Revised To Stable From Negative

RMBS ARREARS STATISTICS

Spain-Based Banco Popular Espanol Ratings Raised To 'BBB+/A-2' On Acquisition By Santander; Outlook Positive

Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1, Washington; Retail Electric

Research Update: Telekom Austria AG Downgraded To 'BBB' On Likely Weaker Credit Measures; 'A-2' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Stable.

Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico Downgraded To 'CC' From 'CCC-' On Imminent Default; Outlook Negative

U.K. Life Insurer Scottish Equitable 'A+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Petroleos Mexicanos And Subsidiaries Upgraded To Foreign Currency 'BBB+' And Local Currency 'A' On Sovereign Upgrade

Mont Blanc Capital Corp. (As Of June 2014)

Mediobanca SpA. Primary Credit Analyst: Regina Argenio, Milan (39) ;

Swiss Financial Services Provider PostFinance AG Assigned 'AA+/A-1+' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Chubb Insurance Singapore Ltd.

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Germany-Based Santander Consumer Bank Outlook Revised To Stable From Positive; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Health Care Service Corp. d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Montana Downgraded

Territory of Yukon 'AA' Rating Affirmed On Exceptional Liquidity And Very Low Debt Burden

S&P Global Ratings: Natural Disasters Credit Update

Royal Bank of Scotland International Rated 'BBB/A-2'; Outlook Positive

Territory of Yukon 'AA' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Is Stable

Dell Inc. Corporate Credit Rating Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Positive On Debt Reduction Expectations

Connecticut; State Revolving Funds/Pools

Dutch Bank LeasePlan 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Placed On Watch Negative On Potential Ownership Change

Banco de Credito del Peru And Subsidiary Upgraded To 'BBB+' From 'BBB' On Stronger Capitalization, Outlook Stable

Germany-Based Specialty Insurer Inter Hannover Downgraded To 'A+' On Change Of Group Structure; Outlook Stable

Marine Insurer The Swedish Club Outlook Revised To Positive On Continuing Solid Operating Performance; Ratings Affirmed

AXA China Region Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. And AXA China Region Insurance Co. Ltd. Rated 'AA-'; Outlook Stable

Dutch Energy Distribution Network Operator Enexis Holding N.V. Assigned 'A-1' Short-Term Rating

Research Update: Austria-Based KA Finanz 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

Italian Multi-Utility Hera Outlook Revised To Negative On Delayed Credit Metric Recovery; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

(/en_us/web/guest/home) MidMichigan Health, MI Bond Rating Outlook Revised To Positive On Operational Performance, Solid Balance Sheet Metrics

Research Update: The Currency Exchange Fund N.V. (TCX) Outlook Revised To Negative From Stable; 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina; CP; Joint Criteria; System

Banca Popolare dell'alto Adige Outlook Revised To Positive From Stable; 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

Comision Federal de Electricidad, PEMEX, And Subsidiaries Local Currency Ratings Cut To 'A-' On Change In S&P Criteria

Temasek Holdings 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed On Close Government Ties; Outlook Stable

Qatar-Based Doha Bank Assurance 'BBB+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Icelandic Bank Islandsbanki Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3' After Change To Agreement With Glitnir; Outlook Still Stable

Austria-Based KA Finanz Downgraded To 'A-/A-2' On Revised Expectation Of State Support; Outlook Stable

Delta Lloyd Operating Entities Upgraded To 'A' On Integration Into And Core Status To NN Group; Outlook Stable

Estonian Power Utility Eesti Energia 'BBB' Ratings On CreditWatch Negative On Announced Plans To Acquire Nelja Energia

Euler Hermes Group Core Subsidiaries Affirmed At 'AA-' On Improved Enterprise Risk Management; Outlook Stable

Irish Life Assurance Rating Raised To 'A-' Based On Criteria For Rating Above The Sovereign; Outlook Stable

ING Verzekeringen N.V.

Elenia Finance Oyj. Primary Credit Analyst: Alf Stenqvist, Stockholm (46) ;

Transcription:

February 24, 2010 Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation Primary Credit Analyst: Brian J Marshall, Dallas (1) 214-871-1414; brian_marshall@standardandpoors.com Secondary Credit Analyst: Omar Tabani, Dallas 214-871-1472; omar_tabani@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Research www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 1

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation Credit Profile US$15. mil GO bonds ser 2010 dtd 03/01/2010 due 09/01/2024 Long Term Rating A/Stable New Orleans Parish Law Enforcement Dist GO bnds ser 2008 dtd 12/01/2008 due 09/01/2018 Long Term Rating A/Stable Upgraded Orleans Parish Law Enforcement Dist GO bnds ser 2001 dtd 03/01/2001 due 03/01/2002-2016 Unenhanced Rating A(SPUR)/Stable Upgraded Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its rating to 'A' from 'BBB' on the Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, La.'s existing general obligation (GO) debt. At the same time, we assigned an 'A' rating and stable outlook to the district's series 2010 GO bonds. The upgrade is based on the district's ability to maintain healthy reserves during a significant capital program and projected strengthening of its financial position in the near term. The rating also reflects our opinion that: The district provides a limited but essential service in the housing of city, state, and federal inmates, allowing for high demand for its operation, given its location within the city of New Orleans and the presence of state and federal courts within its boundaries. The consolidation of the civil sheriff's department and the criminal sheriff's department into one office headed by the criminal sheriff on May 3, 2010, which will add more than $3.8 million to the sheriff office's general fund balance without significant additional expenses. Assessed value (AV) growth will allow the district to maintain its 2.9 millage levy to service its debt and its recently authorized $63 million bond package; The increase in the number of prisoners served by the district lessens the district's dependence on per diem increases to maintain budget structural stability; and Completed and submitted applications that have resulted in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) commitment to fund $237.5 million in construction projects. Under program guidelines, 100% of the architecture and engineering costs are immediately available as well as roughly 75% of the project cost. The rating is constrained, in our view, by: The district's dependence on New Orleans for roughly half of its general fund revenues; Future significant capital needs in the form of new construction through 2011, when management projects to have the capacity to house between 4,500 and 5,000 prisoners; FEMA will fund over 85% of project costs while Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal February 24, 2010 2

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation future bonds sales will fund the remainder; and Adequate income levels, which have not strained property tax collection rates. An unlimited parishwide ad valorem tax secures the bonds. The district is a component unit of Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Office. The criminal sheriff's office is charged with keeping the jails and preserving the peace, and it serves as executive officer of the criminal district courts. The law enforcement district will continue to levy and collect ad valorem taxes to secure GO debt following the May 3, 2010, merger and consolidation of the criminal sheriff and civil sheriff offices into one office to be known as the Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans. The new office will be responsible for all functions, duties, and responsibilities performed by both the criminal sheriff and civil sheriff. Bond proceeds will be used to construct, improve, renovate, and repair jails and other criminal sheriff facilities. Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District is coterminous with the city of New Orleans and Orleans Parish and has a population of over 336,000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. For 2010, the population is estimated at more than 383,000, an increase of nearly 100,000 in the past two years. In January 2010, the state of Louisiana was awarded roughly $474 million in funds from FEMA for storm-related damages to Charity Hospital. The award should help significantly in New Orleans' continued rebuilding. Income levels are adequate, with per capita median household income equal to 86% of the national average. Unemployment is about 6%. The district currently operates seven detention facilities with over 3,514 beds, compared with 12 facilities and 7,900 beds before Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005. Officials plan to increase capacity to roughly 4,500-5,000 by 2013. Despite the reduction in operating revenues, district officials have been able to achieve balanced operations by reducing operating expenditures, in particular those related to personnel. The district has reduced its staff to 750 currently, from 1,200 people pre-katrina. It has substantial flexibility to complete the reconstruction of its facilities. Resources available to the district include more than $237 million in committed funds from FEMA and a $63 million bond program, which was approved by an overwhelming majority of the district's voters in October 2008. These resources will fund a 500-bed temporary jail facility within six months and the bulk of an 1,800-bed facility scheduled to open in 2010. In addition, a 1,500-bed facility is scheduled to open next year. Management projects reaching its target prison population of 4,700 after the opening of its 1,500-bed facility. Roughly 500 federal prisoners, up from 316 in 2008, are projected to be housed in the new facility at that time. In our opinion, the budgetary challenges associated with the ramp-up in facilities are manageable, given the district's proven ability to make operating cuts if necessary, along with a steady increase in the number of prisoners. The increase in prisoners, along with expenditure cuts, has allowed the district to maintain a stable financial position in the midst of its major capital plan. Another factor that will keep the general fund healthy is the projected reduction of 50 security workers through attrition. Since fiscal 2008, district officials have adopted a capital budget that assumed an 85% collection rate of property taxes and a tax rate of 2.9 mills, which is lower than the three mills historically levied by the district. Over the past four years, AV has increased to $2.8 billion for fiscal 2010, from $1.7 billion in fiscal 2006 due to property reappraisal and new construction. Market value is estimated at over $30 billion. There is no concentration among the district's leading taxpayers. AV has exceeded the losses, which represented a $470 million decrease following Katrina. Currently, FEMA grants of roughly $237 million have been awarded and roughly $178 million is now available. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 3

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation The sheriff's office closed fiscal 2008 (Dec. 31) with a $5.9 million unreserved general balance, or 9.5% of operations. The sheriff's office projects ending fiscal 2009 with a $2.4 unreserved general fund balance, or 4% of operations following a planned $3.5 million drawdown related to increased operational costs. A general fund balance of $5.7 million, or 10.2% of operations, is projected for fiscal 2010 following the consolidation of the civil and criminal sheriffs' offices into one sheriff's office to be known as the Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans. After a full year of operating as the Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans, the office's unreserved general fund balance is projected to close 2011 at $8.5 million, or 13.5% of operations. Fiscal 2012 is projected to end with an unreserved general fund balance of $12.1 million, or 20% of operations. Projections are based on the current number of inmates housed, along with, starting in fiscal 2010, a portion of the 500 inmates who will occupy the temporary facility within six months, and the audited fiscal 2009 civil sheriff office's financials. The merger and consolidation of the civil sheriff's office and the criminal sheriff's office into one office on May 3, 2010, will not have a significant operational impact on the budget for the Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans. In fact, at the date of consolidation, $3.8 million of liquid cash assets will become part of the sheriff's office's general fund. Along with its conservative projections, the criminal sheriff's office has a number of measures that may also be implemented to strengthen its financial position. For example, management is prepared to delay its proposed salary raises. Also, management has access to roughly $10 million of revenues in an internal service fund. The district could also introduce an operations levy, which would require voter approval. Based on the district's fiscal 2010 AV, a levy of one mill would produce over $2.4 million, assuming a collection rate of 85%. Following fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007 and 2008 collection rates have been 93% and 97%, respectively. Management projects plant maintenance and capital outlay costs will stabilize following the completion of its facility in fiscal 2013, which, with continued increased housing capacity, will allow reserves to strengthen beyond the above projections. Most of the sheriff's office's recurring operating revenues are attributed to charges to house city, state, and federal inmates, which amounted to $28 million, or 64% of operational general fund revenue at fiscal year-end 2008. The city of New Orleans comprised $23.8 million, or 54% of operational general fund revenues, followed by the federal government (6%), and the state (4%). Federal grants, including FEMA awards, on behalf of payments tied to city vehicles, and other revenues accounted for the office's other primary revenue source at 39% of total general fund revenues. The district's overall debt burden is moderate at 4.6% of market value. Carrying charges are moderate at 9% and amortization of principal is average, with 100% repaid within 20 years. This issue is the third installment of a recently approved $63 million bond authorization. Officials plan to issue $20 million of additional debt within the next 24 months. Outlook The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the district's property tax base will remain stable as New Orleans rebuilds following Katrina and that property tax collections will remain sufficient to cover debt service on the bonds. The pace of construction and renovation of prison facilities to house inmates will be critical to the long-term stability of the district's major operational revenue stream. New Orleans' ability to continue to provide the necessary resources to support the housing of its inmates at the district's facilities will be key to the rating's stability. Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal February 24, 2010 4

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation Related Research USPF Criteria: GO Debt, Oct. 12, 2006 USPF Criteria: Special-Purpose Districts, June 14, 2007 Complete ratings information is available to RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal subscribers at www.globalcreditportal.com and RatingsDirect subscribers at www.ratingsdirect.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 5

Copyright ( c ) 2010 by Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P's opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal February 24, 2010 6