REPORT ON THE WORKING OF THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961 FOR THE YEAR 2010

Similar documents
POPULATION PROJECTIONS Figures Maps Tables/Statements Notes

Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals or Liquidators (Recommendation) Guidelines, 2018

Post and Telecommunications

International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) Status of Urban Co-Operative Banks in India

FOREWORD. Shri A.B. Chakraborty, Officer-in-charge, and Dr.Goutam Chatterjee, Adviser, provided guidance in bringing out the publication.

JOINT STOCK COMPANIES

Note on ICP-CPI Synergies: an Indian Perspective and Experience

STATE DOMESTIC PRODUCT

2011: Annexure I. Guidelines/Norms for Utilization of Funds for conducting Soeio-Economic and Caste Census

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2557

4.4 Building Name 4.5 Block/Sector. 4.8 City 4.9 State Code (Refer to State Code in instructions)

EXPORT OF GOODS AND SOFTWARE REALISATION AND REPATRIATION OF EXPORT PROCEEDS LIBERALISATION

State Government Borrowing: April September 2015

... (Please leave one blank box between two words) 2. Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the person (see instructions)

CONTENTS AT A GLANCE DIRECT TAX INDIRECT TAX CORPORATE LAWS

CONTENTS A BRIEF HISTORY AND FUNCTIONING OF THE RNI OFFICE 1-10 GENERAL REVIEW 11-15

ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS FOR FINANCIAL INCLUSION

Eligible students have to contact our branches where they have availed/availing loans.

The detailed press note issued by Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation is attached herewith for information of the members.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, COOPERATION AND FARMERS WELFARE

1,14,915 cr GoI allocations for Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) in FY

GST Update M.S. CHHAJED & CO. GST UPDATE 2/

A Study of Corruption for Issuing Aadharr Card in India by Using Mathematical Modeling

IRDA Public Disclosures

IRDA Public Disclosures

Labour Regulations: Coverage in North East India

IRDA Public Disclosures

Dr. Najmi Shabbir Lecturer Shia P.G. College, Lucknow

FEE RULES. o Samples/models actual cost; o Postal charges additional; o Inspection of records 1st hour free and Rs 5 for each subsequent 15 mins.

Microfinance Industry Penetration in India: A State - wise Analysis in Context of Micro Credit

OUTSTANDING GOVERNMENT DEBT

IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 9 ISSN:

IRDA Public Disclosures

THE INDIAN HOUSEHOLD SAVINGS LANDSCAPE

Financial Results Q3/FY February 2019

OUTSTANDING GOVERNMENT DEBT

A Class 2 Digital Signature Certificate is available for download after verification based on a trusted and pre-verified database.

GST Concept and Design

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) NOTIFICATION INCOME-TAX

CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION (A GOVT. OF INDIA UNDERTAKING)

FARMER SUICIDES. Will the Minister of AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE क य ण ½ãâ ããè be pleased to state:

Banking Sector Liberalization in India: Some Disturbing Trends

India s CSR reporting survey 2018

1,07,758 cr GoI allocations for Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) in FY

The Critical Role of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises in Employment Generation: An Indian Experience

Analyzing Data of Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana

Dependence of States on Central Transfers: State-wise Analysis

IRDA Public Disclosures

FORM L-1-A : Revenue Account. FORM L-1-A : Revenue Account UP TO THE QUARTER ENDED ON JUNE Non Participating (Linked) Total

Investor Presentation

Customers perception on Pradan Manthri Jan Dhan Yojana in Shivamogga District of Karnataka State, India.

Q4 FY 13. Investor Information

Disclosures - LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES- WEBSITE

Subject: Allocation of foodgrains under Welfare Institutions and Hostels Scheme

IRDA PUBLIC DISCLOSURES FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Analysis of State Budgets :

Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006

Schemes->Margin Money Scheme of Khadi & Village Industries Commission (KVIC) MARGIN MONEY SCHEME OF KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION (KVIC)

SOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED DRAFT 1000 MW GRID CONNECTED ROOF TOP SOLAR PV SCHEME FOR GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS UNDER CAPEX AND RESCO MODELS

PERIODIC DISCLOSURES FORM NL-1-A-REVENUE ACCOUNT TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED IRDAI Registration No. 108, dated January 22, 2001

Year Ended March 31, 2011

By : Brijesh Srivastava, Principal Systems Analyst(NIC-DRD)

BUDGET BRIEFS Vol 9/Issue 3 Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) GOI, ,07,758 cr

Micro Finance and Poverty Alleviation: An Analysis with SHGS Contribution

(b) whether the Government has paid insurance claims as compensation for damage of crops due to floods and drought during the current year;

AN EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL INCLUSION

INDICATORS DATA SOURCE REMARKS Demographics. Population Census, Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India

Commercial Banks, Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth in India

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 1.5 Stat.900 Version 89. Release Notes

Self Help Groups, Eradication of Poverty and Inclusive Growth

Gram Panchayat Development Plan(GPDP) Ministry of Panchayati Raj

Forthcoming in Yojana, May Composite Development Index: An Explanatory Note

Fire Marine Miscellaneous Total Fire Marine Miscellaneous Total 3,37,441 23,19,275 2,14,17,685 2,40,74,401 2,67,675 22,58,259 1,81,45,741 2,06,71,675

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, COOPERATION AND FARMERS WELFARE

Re-organisation of Field Formations in CBEC in. GST Regime

14 th Finance Commission: Review and Outcomes. Economics. February 25, 2015

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO TO BE ANSWERED ON

POVERTY ESTIMATES IN INDIA: SOME KEY ISSUES

Employment and Inequalities

Senior Citizens: Problems and Welfare

Financial Results Q2 & H1 FY November 06, 2015

BUDGET BRIEFS Volume 9, Issue 4 National Health Mission (NHM) GOI,

FINANCIAL INCLUSION: PRESENT SCENARIO OF PRADHAN MANTRI JAN DHAN YOJANA SCHEME IN INDIA

GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF ACCOUNTING DATA UNDER THE CPPC SYSTEM BY AUTHORIZED BANKS. [e-scroll]

LIBRARY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC FINANCE AND POLICY 18/2- SATSANG VIHAR MARG, SPECIAL INSTITUTIONAL AREA,

FORM L-1-A : Revenue Account. FORM L-1-A : Revenue Account UP TO THE QUARTER ENDED ON JUNE Non Participating. (Linked) Individual

Measuring Outreach of Microfinance in India Towards A Comprehensive Index

Ujwal Discom Assurance Yojana

Financial Results Q1 FY July 28, 2015

TRADE UNIONS IN INDIA 2008

The Planning Commission uses the Expert Group1 method

Particulars Schedule FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, (a) Premium 7,708,794 22,405,865 8,363,801 24,295,165

PORTFOLIO MICROMETER. Issue. 14 data as of 30 th June 2015

Disclosures -NON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

XVII. STATUTORY FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS. TABLE 17.1 INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO INDUSTRIES (Rs.

The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (NREGA) Annual Report. April 2008-March 2009

GST Round up. Contents. News Headlines. 2 Analysis. GST Laws 3

IJMIE Volume 2, Issue 8 ISSN:

Indian Regional Rural Banks Growth and Performance

INDIA BPO PROMOTION SCHEME (IBPS)

Transcription:

REPORT ON THE WORKING OF THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961 FOR THE YEAR 2010 1. Scope and Objective 1.1 The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 extends to the whole of the Indian Union and applies to every factory, mine, plantation and circus industry including any such establishments belonging to government but excluding all the establishments covered under the provisions of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. The State Governments are, however, empowered to extend the provisions of the Act to any other establishment subject to the prior approval of the Central Government. The Act also applies to Shops and Commercial Establishments in which 10 or more persons are employed or were employed on any day of the preceding 12 months, and establishments wherein persons are employed for the exhibition of equestrian, acrobatic and other performances. Every woman entitled to the payment of maternity benefit under the Act shall, notwithstanding the application of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 to the factory or other establishments in which she is employed, continue to be so entitled until she becomes qualified to claim maternity benefit under Section 50 of the Act. There is no wage limit for coverage under the Maternity Benefit Act provided a woman is not covered under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. 2. Main Provisions 2.1 The Act regulates the payment of maternity benefits to women employees in certain establishments for certain specified periods before and after the child birth and prescribes for the payment of maternity benefits to them at the rate of average daily wage for the period of their actual absence from duty. The maximum period for which any woman shall be entitled to maternity benefit shall be twelve weeks, that is to say, six weeks up to and including the day of her delivery and six weeks immediately following that day. The Act was last amended by the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 1988 which came into force from 10 th January, 1989. The amended Act provides, inter-alia, for extension of its provisions to Shops and other Commercial Establishments employing 10 or more persons. The qualifying period of service for the entitlement of maternity benefit under the Act has been reduced from 160 days to 80 days of actual work in the preceding twelve months and the rate of medical bonus payable to women employees has been enhanced from Rs. 250 to Rs. 2500 if the employer does not provide prenatal confinement and post-natal care free of charge. The average daily wage of a woman worker for this purpose is to be calculated on the basis of wage earned by her for the days on which she worked during the period of three calendar months immediately preceding the date of her absence

on account of maternity and the rate of maternity benefit would be fixed at the average daily wages for three calendar months or minimum wages fixed or revised under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 or Rs. 10 per day, whichever is higher. 2.2 A provision has also been made for filing of complaints, if any, with the competent court by the aggrieved women workers, or office bearers of a registered trade union of which such women workers are members or a voluntary organisation, or an inspector notified under the Act. The complaints can be filed only with the prior approval of the Inspector. These provisions of the amended Act were brought into force with effect from 10.1.1989. Under the Act, there are also provisions for certain other benefits in case of miscarriage, premature birth or illness arising out of pregnancy. 3. Administration of the Act 3.1 The Central Government is responsible for administration of the provisions of the Act in Mines and in Circus Industry, while the concerned State Governments are responsible for the enforcement of the Act in factories, plantations and other establishments. The Central Government has entrusted the responsibility of administration of the Act to the Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) in respect of Circus Industry. 4. Working of the Act during the year 2010 4.1 In the factory sector, out of 35,293 factories /establishments covered by the Act, 37.58 % submitted annual returns (Table-1). The average daily employment of women workers in these establishments was 5,05,962 of which only 2115 (0.42 %) claimed maternity benefit during the year 2010. However, 1476 claims involving an amount of Rs. 11,43,67,246 including special bonus to the tune of Rs. 5,12,02,449 were accepted and settled. 4.2 In Plantation Sector out of 2,154 plantations 67.27 per cent submitted returns where in 10,61,441 women workers were employed daily. Of the average daily employment of 10,61,441 women workers 32552 (3.07 %) claimed maternity benefit during the year. However, 32,071 claims involving an amount of Rs. 5,73,20,225 including special bonus to the tune of Rs. 20,60,846 were accepted and settled. 4.3 In other establishments, out of 40,562 establishments only 10.93 % submitted returns, in which the average daily employment of women workers was 2,17,969. Of the average daily employment of 2,17,969 women workers, 2,781(1.28 %) claimed maternity benefit. However, only 860 claims involving an amount of Rs. 83,49,380 including special bonus to the tune of Rs. 21,08,910 were accepted and paid.

4.4 The number of claims made per 100 women workers employed in factories, plantations and other establishment along with the average amount of maternity benefits paid in respect of the units submitting returns are presented in Table 2. While the percentage reflects the incidence of claims per hundred women workers employed, the average amount of maternity benefits paid per accepted claim indicates the extent of incidence of monetary impact per case. The percentage of women workers claiming maternity benefits to the total number of women workers employed in factories was the highest at 45.45% in Meghalaya, followed by 3.62% in Jammu & Kashmir and 2.41% in Goa. In plantations, the highest percentage was in Tripura i.e. 4.79% followed by Tamil Nadu 4.21% and Assam 3.08%. So far as the other establishments are concerned the aforesaid percentage i.e. 13.95% relates to the state of Himachal Pradesh only. The table also reveals that the highest average amount of maternity benefits paid was Rs. 2,28,667 in Uttar Pradesh in the factory sector and Rs. 14,364 in Kerala in the plantation sector. In case of other establishments an average amount of Rs. 2,48,260 was paid as maternity benefits to the women workers in Tamil Nadu. 4.5 The details relating to the number of complaints received, number of complaints investigated, number of prosecutions launched, number of convictions obtained and the amount of fine levied in factories, plantations and other establishments are given in Table 3. In the factory sector, 1 prosecution was launched in Odisha. In the plantation sector, 2 complaints were received and investigated in Kerala and 30 prosecutions were launched in Tamil Nadu. In case of other establishments, 8 cases were investigated in Tamil Nadu and 8 prosecutions were launched and 5 convictions obtained with fine of Rs. 2500. 4.6 The statistics pertaining to maternity benefits paid under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 during the year 2009-10 are presented in Table 4. The extent of coverage under the Act varied from State to State. The number of women workers who claimed maternity benefit under this Act was the highest in Karnataka 5968 (25.16 %) followed by Tamil Nadu 5370 (22.64 %), Kerala 3760 (15.85 %) and Maharashtra 3298 (13.90%). The amount of maternity benefit paid was highest in Tamil Nadu State (Rs.7,75,18,099) followed by Karnataka (Rs. 7,70,74,717), Maharashtra (Rs. 6,12,74,097) and Kerala (Rs. 5,20,48,496) during 2009-10. In all, 23,721 women workers claimed the maternity benefit and Rs. 35,91,60,578 was paid to them as maternity benefit under the ESI Act, 1948.

4.7 Since women workers can claim maternity benefits either under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 or under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, the total of the respective figures under these Acts is expected to reflect the progress in the extension of the particular benefit to eligible women workers. The total number of claims paid under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 and the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 was 57,560 and the total amount paid as maternity benefits under both these statutes comes to Rs. 53,91,97,429 during the year, 2010. 5. Limitations of statistics: The report is based on the information received from 20 States and 3 Union Territories whereas the Act extends to whole of India. There are States/UT s such as Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Uttarakhand, Union territories of Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu, and NCT Delhi which have not submitted the annual returns for the year, 2010. In view of this, the report may not be truly representative in nature. Similarly, all-india figures in the report may not be truly comparable over the years as the responding States/UTs vary from year to year.

Table-1 State-wise maternity benefits paid in Factories, Plantations and Other Establishments during the year 2010 I State/Union Territory Number of establishments covered by the Maternity Benefit Act Number of establishments submitting returns Response Rate (%) Average No. of women workers employed daily in establishments submitting returns No. of women who claimed maternity benefit during the year 1 2 3 4 5 6 FACTORIES 1 Andhra Pradesh 13051 4665 35.74 62682 217 (0.35) 2 Assam - - - - - - 3 Bihar 11 8 72.73 28 - - 4 Chhattisgarh 2855 176 6.16 1475 4 (0.27) 5 Goa 71 70 98.59 872 21 (2.41) 6 Haryana 620 608 98.06 17379 331 (1.90) 7 Himachal Pradesh 1371 559 40.77 3692 13 (0.35) 8 Jammu & Kashmir 334 156 46.71 1078 39 (3.62) 9 Jharkhand 315 314 99.68 5444 24 (0.44) 10 Karnataka 8226 5461 66.39 184236 894 (0.49) 11 Kerala 2977 702 23.58 216698 486 (0.22) 12 Meghalaya 97 6 6.19 11 5 (45.45) 13 Odisha 662 22 3.32 958 12 (1.25) 14 Punjab 578 51 8.82 523 2 (0.38) 15 Rajasthan 2721 13 0.48 267 5 (1.87) 16 Tamil Nadu - - - - - - 17 Tripura 486 160 32.92 3506 - - 18 Uttar Pradesh 502 107 21.31 2636 42 (1.59) 19 Chandigarh - - - - - - 20 Mizoram - - - - - - 21 Nagaland - - - - - - 22 Lakshadeep - - - - - - 23 Puducherry 416 186 44.71 4477 20 (0.45) Total 35293 13264 37.58 505962 2115 (0.42) II PLANTATIONS 1 Assam 757 535 70.67 1009923 31058 (3.08) 2 Himachal Pradesh 17 14 82.35 147 - - 3 Karnataka 6 6-6 - - 4 Kerala 672 434 64.58 28233 480 (1.70) 5 Tamil Nadu 596 400 67.11 16278 686 (4.21) 6 Tripura 106 60 56.60 6854 328 (4.79) Total 2154 1449 67.27 1061441 32552 (3.07) III OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS 1 Himachal Pradesh @ 1-43 6 (13.95) 2 Karnataka 18891 242 1.28 17048 255 (1.50) 3 Rajasthan 16584 18 0.11 6547 - - 4 Tamil Nadu 5087 4171 81.99 194331 2520 (1.30) Total 40562 4432 10.93 217969 2781 (1.28) Note - = Nil. Figures in brackets in col. 6 are percentages with reference to column 5. @ Figure not available mentioned in the Annual Return of HP

Table-1 State-wise maternity benefits paid in Factories, Plantations and Other Establishments during the year 2010 I State/Union Territory No. of claims accepted and paid either fully or partially Number of cases in which special Total amount of maternity Amount of Bonus (included under Total From Current year Claims bonus was paid benefits paid (in Rs.). Col. 10) (in Rs) 1 7 8 9 10 11 FACTORIES 1 Andhra Pradesh 164 156 5 14585071 14281 2 Assam - - - - - 3 Bihar - - - 19058-4 Chhattisgarh 4 4 2 527261-5 Goa 21-6 676298-6 Haryana 331 331 247 45311234 78098 7 Himachal Pradesh 13-11 521113 27500 8 Jammu & Kashmir - - - 221000 221000 9 Jharkhand 24 - - 573718-10 Karnataka 871 835 836 44967115 46623645 11 Kerala 5 2 2 372058 21088 12 Meghalaya 5 5 5 70520 33310 13 Odisha 7 - - 539181-14 Punjab 2 2-12820 - 15 Rajasthan 5 - - - - 16 Tamil Nadu - - - - - 17 Tripura - - - - - 18 Uttar Pradesh 24 16 228 5488000 4183527 19 Chandigarh - - - - - 20 Mizoram - - - - - 21 Nagaland - - - - - 22 Lakshadeep - - - - - 23 Puducherry - - - 482799 - Total 1476 1351 1342 114367246 51202449 II PLANTATIONS 1 Assam 31058 3405 879 47913241 1107927 2 Himachal Pradesh - - - - - 3 Karnataka - - - - - 4 Kerala 480 480-6894618 - 5 Tamil Nadu 205 128 29 1559447-6 Tripura 328 328 328 952919 952919 Total 32071 4341 1236 57320225 2060846 III OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS 1 Himachal Pradesh 6 3 56922 7500 2 Karnataka 255 255 255 596410 596410 3 Rajasthan - - - - - 4 Tamil Nadu 31-602 7696048 1505000 Total 292 255 860 8349380 2108910 Note - = Nil.

Table-2 Percentage of claims made and the average amount of maternity benefits paid in Factories, Plantations and Others (By States) during the year 2010 I II III State/Union Territory No. of claims made per 100 women workers employed ( %) Claims made and Benefits paid Average amount of maternity benefits paid per accepted claim (in Rs.) 1 2 3 FACTORIES 1 Andhra Pradesh 0.35 88933 2 Assam - - 3 Bihar - - 4 Chhattisgarh 0.27 131815 5 Goa 2.41 32205 6 Haryana 1.90 136892 7 Himachal Pradesh 0.35 40086 8 Jammu & Kashmir 3.62-9 Jharkhand 0.44 23905 10 Karnataka 0.49 51627 11 Kerala 0.22 74412 12 Meghalaya 45.45 14104 13 Odisha 1.25 77026 14 Punjab 0.38 6410 15 Rajasthan 1.87-16 Tamil Nadu - - 17 Tripura - - 18 Uttar Pradesh 1.59 228667 19 Chandigarh - - 20 Mizoram - - 21 Nagaland - - 22 Lakshadeep - - 23 Puducherry 0.45 - Total 0.42 77485 PLANTATIONS 1 Assam 3.08 1543 2 Himachal Pradesh - - 3 Karnataka - - 4 Kerala 1.70 14364 5 Tamil Nadu 4.21 7607 6 Tripura 4.79 2905 Total 3.07 1787 Other Establishments 1 Himachal Pradesh 13.95 9487 2 Karnataka 1.50 2339 3 Rajasthan - - 4 Tamil Nadu 1.30 248260 Total 1.28 28594 - = Nil.

Table - 3 Number of complaints received and prosecutions launched (By States) during the year 2010 State/Union Territory No. of complaints received No. of complaints investigated No. of prosecutions launched No. of convictions obtained Amount of fine levied (Rs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 I FACTORIES 1 Andhra Pradesh - - - - - 2 Assam - - - - - 3 Bihar - - - - - 4 Chhattisgarh - - - - - 5 Goa - - - - - 6 Haryana - - - - - 7 Himachal Pradesh - - - - - 8 Jammu & Kashmir - - - - - 9 Jharkhand - - - - - 10 Karnataka - - - - - 11 Kerala - - - - - 12 Meghalaya - - - - - 13 Odisha - - 1 - - 14 Punjab - - - - - 15 Rajasthan - - - - - 16 Tamil Nadu - - - - - 17 Tripura - - - - - 18 Uttar Pradesh - - - - - 19 Chandigarh - - - - - 20 Mizoram - - - - - 21 Nagaland - - - - - 22 Lakshadeep - - - - - 23 Pudducherry - - - - - Total 0 0 1 0 0 II PLANTATIONS 1 Assam - - - - - 2 Himachal Pradesh - - - - - 3 Karnataka - - - - - 4 Kerala 2 2 - - - 5 Tamil Nadu - - 30 - - 6 Tripura - - - - - Total 2 2 30 0 0 III OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS 1 Himachal Pradesh - - - - - 2 Karnataka - - - - - 3 Odisha - - 1 - - 4 Rajasthan - - - - - 5 Tamil Nadu 8 8 8 5 2500 Total 8 8 9 5 2500 - = Nil

Table - 4 Maternity benefits paid under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 during the financial year 2009-2010 Sl. No. State/Union Territory No. of insured women as on 31.3.2010 Number of maternity benefit case (confinement) during the year 2009-2010 Amount paid during the year 2009-2010 1 2 3 4 5 1 Andhra Pradesh 172200 1160 (4.89) 24766813 2 Assam, Meghalaya & Tripura 6000 68 (0.29) 1099665 3 Bihar 3800 22 (0.09) 339200 4 Chhattisgarh 3750 11 (0.05) 144578 5 Delhi 70400 403 (1.70) 8746971 6 Goa 23500 362 (1.53) 6315280 7 Gujarat 66000 462 (1.95) 6919486 8 Haryana 29800 485 (2.04) 7716431 9 Himachal Pradesh 31850 202 (0.85) 2543267 10 Jammu & Kashmir 16500 44 (0.19) 543602 11 Jharkhand 15050 62 (0.26) 799697 12 Karnataka 466300 5968 (25.16) 77074717 13 Kerala 229950 3760 (15.85) 52048496 14 Madhya Pradesh 22050 133 (0.56) 2104732 15 Maharashtra 301600 3298 (13.90) 61274097 16 Odisha 16950 150 (0.63) 1578168 17 Punjab 107450 262 (1.10) 4260103 18 Rajasthan 41300 277 (1.17) 4056366 19 Tamil Nadu 499800 5370 (22.64) 77518099 20 Uttar Pradesh 38350 514 (2.17) 7812562 21 Uttarakhand 4000 36 (0.15) 548270 22 West Bengal 51750 233 (0.98) 3681754 23 Chandigarh 20400 99 (0.42) 1918827 24 Puducherry 21500 340 (1.43) 5349397 All India 2260250 23721 (100) 359160578 Source: Note. The Employees State Insurance Corporation New Delhi Figures in brackets in col. 4 are percentages of the All India