Strengthening Unemployment Insurance

Similar documents
The Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States

The Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States

Unemployment Insurance: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

State Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey

NELP Briefing Paper. Indexed State Taxable Wage Bases: Taking A Significant Step Toward Better UI Financing

WikiLeaks Document Release

820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:

The Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

Unemployment Insurance: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Credit Where Credit is (Over) Due

Phase-Out of Federal Unemployment Insurance

NCSL FISCAL BRIEF: PROJECTED STATE TAX GROWTH IN FY 2012 AND BEYOND

The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro

Motor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on An Overview of Changes in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) for Medicaid July 2011

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

The Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States

Unemployment Insurance: Programs and Benefits

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

CAPITOL research. States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Recovery Act Expires. health

WikiLeaks Document Release

The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *

National Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008

Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions

CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State

DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State

State Income Tax Tables

US Economic Briefing: Consumer Confidence

10 yrs. The benefit is capped at 80% of FAS. An elected official may. 2% (first 10 yrs.); or 2.25% (second 10 yrs.); or 2.5% over 20 yrs.

US Economic Briefing: Consumer Confidence

STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

Unemployment Insurance: Programs and Benefits

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

8, ADP,

Termination Final Pay Requirements

BY THE NUMBERS 2016: Another Lackluster Year for State Tax Revenue

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

CRS Report for Congress

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

ATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

Financing State Accounts in the Unemployment Trust Fund: Title XII Advances and Alternative Payment Options

2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes

Financing Unemployment Benefits in Today s Tough Economic Times

2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER

Total State and Local Business Taxes

USING INCOME TAXES TO ADDRESS STATE BUDGET SHORTFALLS. By Elizabeth C. McNichol

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State

TA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17

TANF FUNDS MAY BE USED TO CREATE OR EXPAND REFUNDABLE STATE CHILD CARE TAX CREDITS

UPDATED BRIEF WITH 2016 DATA

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

Preparing for Recession in the States: Strengthen the Unemployment Insurance System

Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income

STATES CAN RETAIN THEIR ESTATE TAXES EVEN AS THE FEDERAL ESTATE TAX IS PHASED OUT. By Elizabeth C. McNichol, Iris J. Lav and Joseph Llobrera

Virginia Has Improved The Tax Treatment of Low-Income Families, And an EITC Modeled on The Federal EITC Would Go Further.

(In effect as of January 1, 2006*) TABLE 17. OFFSET PROVISIONS IN STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016

SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE NUTRITION TITLE By Dorothy Rosenbaum and Stacy Dean

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1998, it represented 18.2 percent of all food stamp

Committee on Ways and Means Democrats

Federal Rates and Limits

REFORMING THE TAX TREATMENT OF S-CORPORATIONS AND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES CAN HELP STATES FINANCE PUBLIC SERVICES By Michael Mazerov

FISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans

WikiLeaks Document Release

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1999, it 20.1 percent of all food stamp households. Over

UNMET NEED HITS RECORD LEVEL FOR THE UNEMPLOYED

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

Fiscal Policy Project

Restoring Unemployment Insurance as Social Insurance

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. Figure 1. Leading indices. 1/18 2/18 3/18 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/1811/1812/18 1/19 Mississippi

Unemployment Compensation (Insurance) and Military Service

Crisis of Long-Term Unemployment is Far From Over Now Reaching Most Segments of the Labor Market By

PAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS

Ability-to-Repay Statutes

Federal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I

Taxes and Economic Competitiveness. Dale Craymer President, Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (512)

Undocumented Immigrants are:

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

Chapter D State and Local Governments

State Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 2015 mirrored rise in overall health care costs

Payroll for Small Businesses: How Legislative Changes Will Affect Your Business in 2011

!!!!!!!! Testimony!of! Andrew!Stettner! National!Employment!Law!Project!!!! Hearing!Before!the! U.S.!House!of!Representatives,!

J.P. Morgan Funds 2018 Distribution Notice

SENATE PROPOSAL TO ADD UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS IMPROVES EFFECTIVENESS OF STIMULUS BILL by Chad Stone, Sharon Parrott, and Martha Coven

2016 Client Payroll Information Guide

State Unemployment Insurance Roundup National Employment Law Project

State Estate Taxes BECAUSE YOU ASKED ADVANCED MARKETS

White Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

Hired and Non-Owned Liability Supplemental Application All questions must be answered in full. Application must be signed and dated by the applicant.

Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

STATE BUDGET UPDATE: SPRING 2012

FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference

FARM BILL CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT DOMESTIC NUTRITION IMPROVEMENTS By Dorothy Rosenbaum 1

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Buffalo Commons Centers, Institutes, Programs 4-27-2010 Strengthening Unemployment Insurance Robert Mietlicki Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/buffalocommons Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. Support this valuable resource today! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Centers, Institutes, Programs at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Commons by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

Strengthening Unemployment Insurance Abstract A person s eligibility for unemployment insurance in New York State is determined by the New York State Unemployment Insurance Law. A person may be eligible for benefits if he lost his job due to a lack of work, such as the end of seasonal or temporary employment or the downsizing of a company. A person may also be eligible if he was fired because he did not meet an employer s qualifications for a job. A worker may be denied unemployment benefits if he was fired for cause, quit his job, or was not working because of a work stoppage in violation of a current collective bargaining agreement. Keywords Buffalo, Poverty/Low Wage Work/Income Inequality, Public Assistance, Wages and Benefits, Policy Brief, PPG, PDF This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/buffalocommons/316

Policy Brief April 27, 2010 Strengthening Unemployment Insurance Robert Mietlicki Unemployment insurance is temporary income for eligible workers who become unemployed through no fault of their own and who are ready, willing, and able to work and have sufficient wages in covered employment. 1 New York s eligibility rules and benefit levels are similar to those of most states. The greatest issue facing unemployment insurance is the solvency of the trust funds that finance it. Raising benefit levels and length of eligibility would be beneficial, if it is accompanied by a higher, indexed taxable wage base to keep the fund solvent. What are the basic eligibility requirements for Unemployment Insurance in New York State? A person s eligibility for unemployment insurance in New York State is determined by the New York State Unemployment Insurance Law. A person may be eligible for benefits if he lost his job due to a lack of work, such as the end of seasonal or temporary employment or the downsizing of a company. A person may also be eligible if he was fired because he did not meet an employer s qualifications for a job. A worker may be denied unemployment benefits if he was fired for cause, quit his job, or was not working because of a work stoppage in violation of a current collective bargaining agreement. Under the New York State Unemployment Insurance Law, there are two base periods that a person can use to qualify for unemployment benefits. 2 The Basic Base Period is [t]he first four of the last five completed calendar quarters prior to the calendar quarter in which [a person s] claim

begins. 3 The Alternate Base Period is [t]he last four completed calendar quarters in which [a person s] claim begins. 4 To qualify for benefits a person must meet three requirements: 1. He must have worked and received wages in at least two calendar quarters of his base period; 2. He must have been paid at least $1,600 in one of the calendar quarters of his base period; and, 3. His total wages for his base period must be one and half times his high quarter wages. 5 There is an exception to the third requirement for people whose high quarter wages are $8,910 or higher. For these people, their earnings in the other calendar quarters must be at least half of $8,910, or $4,455. 6 How is a person s eligibility determined? Eligibility is first determined by looking to a person s Basic base period. If he qualifies under his Basic base period, this base period will be used to establish the claim. 7 If a person does not qualify under his Basic base period, he can try to establish eligibility under his Alternate base period. 8 If a person qualifies under his Basic base period, but thinks his benefits will be greater under his Alternate base period, he has 10 days from the initial monetary notice to have his rate changed using his Alternate base period. 9 A person s benefit rate is determined using his actual high quarter wages provided by his employer to the New York State Wage Reporting system. 10 Generally, a person s weekly benefits rate is one twenty-sixth (1/26) the high quarter wages paid [in his] base period. 11 There is an exception for people whose high quarter wages were $3,575 or less. For people in this situation, their weekly benefit rate is one twenty-fifth of their high quarter wages. 12 2

What are the current Unemployment benefits in New York? The maximum weekly benefit level is $405. 13 A person s claim lasts one year, called his benefit year. 14 During this time period, he can only receive 26 times [his] full benefit rate. 15 Also, a person s weekly benefit payment will be reduced by one-quarter for each day he works or for each day he is no longer eligible to receive benefits. 16 For purposes of adjusting benefits based on work completed, a person is employed on any day he performs services. 17 The person need not be paid on that day for the work. 18 Self-employment or free-lance work for another is considered work. 19 Therefore, work can be defined as [a]ny activity which brings in or may bring in income at any time. 20 Finally, if a person earns more than $405 in any week during his benefit year, he can receive no benefits for that week. 21 What must a person do to maintain eligibility? After becoming eligible for unemployment insurance, a person must maintain his eligibility throughout his benefit year. To be eligible for benefits, [a person] must be available for work and demonstrate that availability by actively looking for work while [he is] claiming benefits. 22 A person will not receive benefits if he does not seek suitable work, which is defined as work for which [he is] reasonably fitted by training and/or experience. 23 After receiving 13 weeks of benefits, suitable work for a claimant will also include any work that you are capable of performing whether or not you have any experience or training in such work, unless you obtain work through a union hiring hall or have a definite date to return to work. 24 This work must pay a prevailing wage for similar work and must pay the person at least 80% of his high quarter wages. 25 Finally, a person must travel a reasonable distance for work. 26 How do New York s eligibility rules compare to other states? In terms of eligibility, almost all states use the same formula as New York for determining a person s Basic Base Period, which is the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters preceding the filing of the claim. 27 In contrast, Massachusetts uses the four completed calendar quarters 3

preceding the benefit year, while Minnesota uses the last four calendar quarters as long as the effective date of the person s claim is not in the immediate month following the forth calendar quarter. 28 Like New York State, 41 other states have provisions for determining an Alternative Base Period or an Extended Base Period. 29 States use four different methods for determining a person s monetary eligibility. The four methods are Multiple of High-Quarter Wages, Multiple of Weekly Benefit Amount, Flat Qualifying Amount and Weeks/Hours of Employment. 25 states use the Multiple of High-Quarter Wages method, 13 states use the Multiple of Weekly Benefit Amount Method, seven states us the Flat Qualifying Amount method and five states use the Weeks/Hours of Employment method. 30 How do New York s current benefits compare to other states? State benefit levels are a combination of the weekly benefit payment and the number of weeks a person is eligible for benefits. In terms of maximum weekly payments, New York State fits in with a majority of the other states. Most states provide average benefit payments in the range of $300 to $500. 31 The average weekly benefit payment for the 50 states and Washington, D.C. is $410. 32 States that provide the highest maximum weekly benefit payments are: 33 STATE MAXIMUM BENEFIT LEVEL Massachusetts $628-942 Rhode Island $528-660 Pennsylvania $558-566 Connecticut $519-594 New Jersey $584 States that provide the lowest maximum weekly benefit payments are: 34 STATE MAXIMUM BENEFIT LEVEL Mississippi $230 Arizona $240 Alabama $255 Tennessee $275 Florida $275 4

While Florida pays one of the lowest maximum weekly benefits, it provides them for the longest, with a maximum of 79 weeks. 35 How does New York eligibility length compare to other states? New York State is slightly above average in terms of the maximum number of weeks a person is eligible for benefits. 36 In New York, the maximum length of eligibility is 72 weeks. 37 The average maximum number of weeks for the 50 states and Washington, D.C. is 67.33 weeks. 38 Seventeen states and Washington, D.C. provide benefits for a maximum of 79 weeks. 39 States that provide benefits for the longest are: 40 STATE Rhode Island Ohio Alaska Minnesota New Jersey States that provide benefits for the shortest are: 41 STATE Oklahoma North Dakota Nebraska South Dakota Louisiana MAXIMUM ELIGIBILTY LENGTH 79 weeks 79 weeks 79 weeks 79 weeks 79 weeks MAXIMUM ELIGIBILTY LENGTH 42 weeks 42 weeks 42 weeks 42 weeks 42 weeks Only Rhode Island and New Jersey make the top five in terms of maximum weekly benefit payments and maximum number of weeks a person is eligible. 42 Thirteen other states provide benefits for a maximum number of 72 weeks. 43 The 20 remaining states provide benefits for a maximum number of weeks ranging from 49 to 59. 44 All states in the top five in terms of lowest maximum weekly benefit payments provide benefits for a maximum of at least 59 weeks. 45 5

What is the biggest issue confronting New York s Unemployment Insurance system? Solvency and financing are the main issues New York needs to confront. Unemployment insurance is financed through unemployment insurance trust funds. The U.S. Treasury maintains 59 accounts in the Federal Unemployment Trust Fund, one for each state and nine others. 46 The state accounts consist of contributions and reimbursements collected by the states. 47 In New York, the trust fund is mainly funded by a tax on a wage base paid by employers who employ people in areas of covered employment. New York employers must pay a tax on the first $8,500 earned by each of their employees. 48 The federal government also imposes an unemployment insurance tax on a federal taxable wage base of $7,000, which results in an annual federal unemployment insurance tax of $56 per employee. 49 Finally, New York employs an experience rating system, where employers contributions are varied based on their experience with the risk of unemployment. 50 Basically, employers who have higher unemployment insurance claims filed by their former employees will have to pay higher taxes in the future. According to the National Employment Law Project, New York s unemployment insurance trust fund is insolvent. The current balance of 6

the trust fund is -$3,001,000,000. 51 New York, however, is not alone. Thirty-three other states and the U.S. Virgin Islands are currently insolvent. 52 California has the lowest trust fund balance at minus $8,409,000,000. 53 How can New York strengthen its unemployment benefits? The only way to strengthen New York s unemployment insurance benefits is to solve the trust fund solvency issue. New York State is in no position to increase the maximum weekly benefit payments or the maximum number of weeks a person is eligible for benefits until the financing issue is resolved. The insolvency can be attributed to two factors. First, through the course of the recent recession, unemployment has risen dramatically. As unemployment insurance claims rise and the length that people are receiving unemployment insurance lengthens, states have to pay more out of their trust funds. 54 Second, as companies have downsized and businesses have failed, the tax contributions of employers into the trust funds have decreased. 55 The first step New York can take towards solving its unemployment insurance financing problems is to raise the level of the taxable wage base. Most of the states with solvency problems have low taxable wage bases. For example, Michigan, with a taxable wage base of $9,000, has a current trust fund balance of minus 3,783,000,000. 56 States in the best financial shape, however, have higher taxable wage bases. Washington, which has a current trust fund balance of $2,108,000,000 57, has an indexed taxable wage base of $36,800. 58 Generally, [o]f the 33 states and the Virgin Islands that are currently insolvent, 20 have a taxable wage base of $10,000 or less and 26 have taxable wage bases that are less than $15,000. 59 Therefore, New York should pass legislation that would raise its taxable wage base and annually adjust it upwardly based on the overall growth in average wages throughout the state, creating an indexed taxable wage base. [O]f the 13 states likely to remain solvent during 2010, 10 states 7

have an indexed taxable wage base. 60 Even Louisiana, which has a low taxable wage base of $8,000, 61 has a current trust fund balance of $1,022,000,000 because it the base is indexed and has kept up with the times. 62 An indexed taxable wage base makes sense for New York employers and employees. It would put an end to the regressive nature of the unemployment tax that, regardless of wage level, caps all taxes at $8,500. How would increased benefits help unemployed workers? If New York can make its trust fund solvent, an increase in benefits to unemployed workers would be extremely beneficial. Increased benefits would prevent workers from slipping into poverty and place money in the hands of those people most likely to spend it, which would in turn fuel economic growth. Several bills that would increase unemployment benefits are in front of the New York State legislature. For example, Assembly Bill 04920A would amend the current unemployment insurance law to provide gradual increases in the maximum benefit level to $525 in 2010, $575 in 2011, $625 in 2012 and then indexed to one-half the weekly benefit rate from 2013 onward. 63 The bill would also increase the taxable wage base to $11,500 in 2010, $13,000 in 2011, $15,000 in 2012 and then indexed with inflation from 2013 onward. 64 The last action on the bill was on January 6, 2010 when it was referred to the Labor Committee. 65 Passage of the bill would help unemployed workers while fixing the financing problems. 1 New York State Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Information for Claimants: A Handbook for Persons Claiming Benefits under the New York State Unemployment Insurance Law at 1, http://www.labor.state.ny.us/formsdocs/ui/tc318_3e.pdf. 2 Id at 2. 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Id at 3. 6 Id. 7 Id. 8 Id. 9 Id. 10 Id at 4. 11 Id. 12 Id. 13 Id. 14 Id at 5. 15 Id. 8

16 New York State Department of Labor, Before You Apply for Unemployment: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.labor.state.ny.us/ui/claimantinfo/beforeyouapplyfaq.shtm#9. 17 Id. 18 Id. 19 Id. 20 Id. 21 Id. 22 New York State Department of Labor, supra note 1, at 8. 23 Id. 24 Id. 25 Id. 26 Id. 27 United States Department of Labor, Comparison of State Unemployment Laws, Monetary Entitlement, http://www.ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/pdf/uilawcompar/2010/monetary.pdf. 28 Id. 29 Id. 30 Id. 31 File Unemployment, Unemployment Benefits Comparison by State, http://fileunemployment.org/unemployment-benefits-comparison-by-state. 32 Id. 33 Id. 34 Id. 35 Id. 36 Id. 37 Id. 38 Id. 39 Id. 40 Id. 41 Id. 42 Id. 43 Id. 44 Id. 45 Id. 46 United States Department of Labor, Comparison of State Unemployment Laws, Financing, http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/pdf/uilawcompar/2010/financing.pdf. 47 Id. 48 Id. 49 Id. 50 Id. 51 National Employment Law Project, Understanding the Unemployment Trust Fund Crisis of 2010, Appendix, http://www.nelp.org/page/- /UI/solvencyupdate2010.pdf?nocdn=1. 52 Id. 53 Id. 54 Id at 1. 55 Id. 56 Id at appendix. 57 Id at appendix. 58 United States Department of Labor, supra note 43. 59 National Employment Law Project, supra note 43, at 3. 60 National Employment Law Project, supra note 48, at 3. 61 United States Department of Labor, supra note 43. 9

62 Id at appendix. 63 New York State Assembly, A04920 Summary, http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=a04920&summary=y&actions=y&v otes=y&memo=y&text=y. 64 Id. 65 Id. Partnership for the Public Good 237 Main St., Suite 1200, Buffalo NY 14203 www.ppgbuffalo.org 10