Common Deficiencies in Employee Benefit Plan Limited Scope Audit Certifications

Similar documents
Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center. Plan advisory. Limited scope audits. of employee benefit plans

Statutory and Regulatory Basis Congress and the U.S. Department of Labor permit limited scope audits of ERISA plans.

Final Balloted Draft

Updates to Peer Reviews of EBP Audits, including 403(b) Plan Considerations

ASB Meeting January 16-19, 2018

Effective monitoring of outsourced plan recordkeeping and reporting functions

Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards, Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements of Employee Benefit Plans Subject to ERISA

Hot Topics IN PLAN AUDITS

Agenda Item 4 Reporting on ERISA Financial Statements Cover Letter and Issues Paper

ASB Meeting July 23-26, 2018

CPE. Advanced Auditing for Defined Contribution Retirement Plans

Audit Engagement Letter a. [CPA Firm s Letterhead]

SM SERVICE AGREEMENT. . The Plan Year in which Client engages MVP to begin providing services

The importance of hiring a quality auditor

Reviewing Workpapers -- Avoiding Deficient Audits

2015 Employee Benefit Plan Audit Conference Basic Audit Workshop Maryland Association of CPA s Columbia, Maryland April 27, 2015

MACPA Employee Benefit Plan Conference. May 19, EBPAQC Update. Ian MacKay, CPA Director EBPAQC

RE: Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards, Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements of Employee Benefit Plans Subject to ERISA

Employee benefit plan large filers: Meeting your compliance and fiduciary requirements. April 20, 2016

SUMMARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR FINAL RULE UNDER SECTION 408(b)(2) SERVICE PROVIDER FEE DISCLOSURE. February 6, 2012

Overview and Introduction. Basic Audit Workshop. Discussion Leaders. Michael E. Auerbach Marilee P. Lau Employee Benefit Plan Audit Conference

Reporting on Internal Control in an Integrated Audit

Compilation Engagements

Wipfli LLP 11 Scott Street, Suite 400 Wausau, WI PO Box 8010 Wausau, WI fax

That s A Wrap! Lessons Learned During the Prior Year Audit Season. May 6, 2014

Preparation of Financial Statements

Proof of Fee Disclosure -An Example

The Importance of Hiring a Quality Auditor. to Perform Your Employee Benefit Plan Audit. Plan Advisory

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS FOR NFPs. Bertha Minnihan, Partner, Moss Adams LLP Brad Wall, Partner, Moss Adams LLP

Date: October 25, 2010 TCRS : Department Of Labor Final Regulations Relating To Participant Fee Disclosure

Report of Independent Accountants

2012 MACPA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS CONFERENCE MAY 8, 2012 Department of Labor Update

STATEMENT OF MARILEE LAU, CPA, AND MICHELE WELDON, CPA ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS BEFORE THE

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN AUDITS - CFO S RESPONSIBILITIES. Gary Broder, Bob Hamilton & Hosanna Custodio

ANNUAL REPORT ON THE INTERIM INSPECTION PROGRAM RELATED TO AUDITS OF BROKERS AND DEALERS (PCAOB Release No August 20, 2018)

Multiple Employer Retirement Plans and Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements

US Department of Labor Issues Final Rule on Service Provider Fee Disclosure

Meeting Standards Related to Expenses

Accounting Standards Update (ASU)

Welcome To. Cecil Patterson, Jr., CPA

Keeping Your Organization s Retirement Plan in Shape: A Two-Part CAPLAW Webinar Series. Webinar One: Ins and Outs of Retirement Plan Audits

EBPFAQ Introduction. Indiana Society of CPAs September 17, 2013 Concurrent Session 2: The EBP Market 2013 Address Common Questions

RETIREMENT PLAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT TRINITY PORTFOLIO ADVISORS LLC

Thank you, Gary D. Campbell, CFA President. Enc. 5. Compliance Employer Vendor Letter

Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit Plans: Have you considered everything?

12/31/14. SSARS No. 21. SSARS No. 21. Changes to Reporting & Documentation. Released October 23, 2014

Re: Proposed Statement On Auditing Standards Forming An Opinion And Reporting On Financial Statements Of Employee Benefit Plans Subject To ERISA

An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated With an Audit of Financial Statements

GUIDE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SERVICES: COMPILATION, REVIEW AND AUDIT. To make your business #CPAPOWERED, call today and let s get started.

Re: Exposure Draft of the 2020 Global Investment Performance Standards (August 31, 2018).

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC's Guide to Audits of Employee Benefit Plans. Twenty sixth Edition (February 2016)

ACCOUNTING & AUDITING UPDATE

THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A CLAIMS MADE POLICY

ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING SUPPLEMENT NO

The Peterson Company Retirement Savings Plan

Schwab Bank Collective Trust Funds

Overview and Introduction. Basic Audit Workshop. Discussion Leaders. Michael Auerbach Marilee P. Lau 4/29/2013

MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND SEIU PROPERTY SERVICES NEW ENGLAND TRAINING FUND

Getting Ready for the 2009 Form 5500

Fiduciary compliance reviews: For your defined-contribution plan

Fund Operating Guidelines for the SSGA US Bank-Maintained Commingled Funds 1

Q & A HELPFUL TIPS TO PREPARE FOR A RETIREMENT PLAN AUDIT. Plan sponsor Q&A JUL 2016

ASB Meeting October 13-15, Possible SAS for Reporting on Internal Control and Compliance in an Employee Benefit Plan Audit

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 11-K

Managing Employer Fiduciary Issues for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Sponsors in 2013

IFRS APPLICATION AROUND THE WORLD JURISDICTIONAL PROFILE: Israel

Kathleen M. Jackson, CPA Novak Francella LLC Bala Cynwyd, PA

John Russon, CPA Audit Partner, CNM LLP

Private Companies Practice Section. Avoid potholes. for a smooth ride to peer review. i Avoid potholes for a smooth ride to peer review

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

DOL Opinion Letter 95-17A

Obtaining Quality Employee Benefit Plan Audit Services: The Request for Proposal and Auditor Evaluation Process

Chapter 17. Auditors Reports. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Copyright 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 11-K

October 21, Re: «Plan_Name» Dear «Primary_Contact Prefix» «Primary_Contact Last_Name»:

CHAPTER 2 DOL FINAL REGULATIONS ON ERISA SECTION 408(b)(2) DOL FINAL REGULATIONS ON ERISA SECTION 408(b)(2)

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Agenda Item 1A Statement on May 2018 Standards for 24 Accounting and Review Services

EXPOSURE DRAFT PROPOSED STATEMENT ON STANDARDS FOR ACCOUNTING AND REVIEW SERVICES

EBP ACCOUNTING, AUDITING AND REGULATORY UPDATE

Reporting on an Audit:

Memo No. Issue Date May 27, Meeting Date(s) EITF June 10, EITF Issue No. 16-B, Employee Benefit Plan Master Trust Reporting

IFRS APPLICATION AROUND THE WORLD JURISDICTIONAL PROFILE: Papua New Guinea

401(k) Fee Disclosure Form

AU-C Section 930, Interim Financial Information Proposed SSARS Review of Financial Statements Explanation for Differences

ROLLINS COLLEGE RETIREMENT PLAN

THE ETHICS INTERPRETATIONS AND ETHICS RULINGS CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 31, 2013

COMPARISON OF GREATBANC TRUST COMPANY (GB) PROCESS AGREEMENT, FIRST BANKERS TRUST SERVICES (FBTS) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND JOYNER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Farm Credit Foundations Pre-409A Frozen Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Financial Statements December 31, 2013 and 2012

Frequently Asked Questions On The Small Pension Plan Audit Waiver Regulation

benefits magazine december 2017 MAGAZINE

Perspectives on Fiduciary Responsibility

DOL Update. Employee Benefit Plans Audit Conference May 6, 2013

Retirement Plan Compliance and Controls

ACCOUNTANTS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE APPLICATION

Agenda Item 2A PROPOSED STATEMENT ON STANDARDS FOR ACCOUNTING AND REVIEW SERVICES REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS

Presenters. James Jaramillo. Rose Ann Abraham, CPA. Todd Solomon, JD. Partner, McDermott Will & Emery LLP. Partner, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

ROTH Individual Retirement Account

How-To Guide for the. Plan and Investment Disclosure

Transcription:

Common Deficiencies in Employee Benefit Plan Limited Scope Audit Certifications Copyright 2017 by The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY 10036-8775

Common Deficiences in Employee Benefit Plan Limited Scope Audit Certifications Contents Common Deficiencies in Employee Benefit Plan... 1 Limited Scope Audit Certifications... 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 Plan Administrator s Responsibilities for Determining the Acceptability of a Limited Scope Certification...3 Auditor s Responsibilities for Determining Whether a Certification Can be Relied Upon to Limit the Scope of the Audit...4 Common Deficiencies in Limited Scope Certifications...4 No Certification or Incomplete Certification...4 Omissions and Errors in the Certification...4 Information Improperly Certified...5 Incorrect/Improper Information Certified...5 Limited Scope Certification...6

Common Deficiencies in Employee Benefit Plan Limited Scope Audit Certifications INTRODUCTION Under certain circumstances, plan management may elect to adopt an exemption under ERISA section 103(a)(3)(C) that allows plan administrators to instruct the auditor not to perform any additional procedures with respect to the investment information prepared and certified by a bank or similar institution or by an insurance carrier that is regulated, supervised, and subject to periodic examination by a state or federal agency. This limited scope audit exemption is implemented by Title 29 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 2520.103-8 that outlines the DOL s rules and regulations for reporting and disclosure under ERISA. One of the most common deficiencies found in EBP audits by the Department of Labor (DOL) and AICPA Peer Review program is the improper use of the ERISA limited scope exemption because the certification did not meet the requirements in the CFR for an acceptable certification. The limited scope certification should be prepared by a qualified institution, and should be in writing and signed, either manually or electronically, by a person authorized to represent the qualified institution. It should be specific to the plan subject to audit, and the investments and investment information covered by the certification should be as of and for the period ended on the financial statement date. The limited scope exemption is available only if the qualified certifying institution certifies both the accuracy and completeness of the investment information submitted. The Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center has developed this tool to help plan administrators understand their responsibilities for determining the acceptability of a limited scope certification; help auditors understand their responsibilities for determining whether a certification can be relied upon to limit the scope of the audit; and to help both plan administrators and auditors identify common deficiencies in limited scope certifications. It also includes an illustration of a proper certification. This tool may be used in conjunction with the EBPAQC Tool Documentation of the Evaluation of a Certification for Use in a Limited Scope Audit, and the EBPAQC Topix Primer, Limited Scope Audits. Plan Administrator s Responsibilities for Determining the Acceptability of a Limited Scope Certification As noted in an Information Letter issued by the DOL in May 2002, consistent with the obligation of plan administrators to file complete and accurate annual reports, it is the responsibility of the plan administrator to determine whether the conditions for limiting the scope of the audit, as set forth in ERISA and DOL regulations, have been satisfied. Plan administrators also should take steps to make sure they understand the nature and scope of the certification the institution has provided before concluding that the certified information may be used to satisfy the administrator s obligation to report the current value of the assets on the plan s annual report (Form 5500 Series) and in the plan s financial statements. The DOL observed that if there is a question as to whether a party providing a certification as an authorized representative of a financial institution holding plan assets is in fact authorized to represent the financial entity for this purpose, as may be the case where there is not an explicit statement of authority included as part of the certification, the plan administrator must take steps to resolve this question before authorizing limited scope reporting. As part of its fiduciary duties, the plan administrator is responsible for determining whether the financial statements and note disclosures related to investment information are prepared in accordance with GAAP and in compliance with DOL rules and regulations. In situations where the plan administrator becomes aware that adequate year-end valuation procedures have not been performed, and, therefore, the financial statements may

not be prepared in accordance with GAAP, the plan administrator may request the qualified certifying institution to recertify or amend the certification for such investments at their appropriate year-end values, or to exclude such investments from the certification. If the trustee or custodian amends the certification to exclude such investments from the certification, the plan administrator is responsible for determining the fair values of such investments as of the plan year-end and engaging the auditor to perform full-scope audit procedures on the investments excluded from the certification. If the certification is not amended, it is the plan administrator s responsibility to determine whether the financial statements and note disclosures related to such investment information are prepared in accordance with DOL rules and regulations and generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Auditor s Responsibilities for Determining Whether a Certification Can be Relied Upon to Limit the Scope of the Audit The AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, Employee Benefit Plans (Guide), establishes certain responsibilities the auditor has related to determining whether it can be relied upon to limit the scope of the audit as permitted by ERISA section 103(a)(3)(C), including obtaining and reading a copy of the certification from the plan administrator, and determining whether the entity issuing the certification is a qualifying institution under DOL regulations. The AICPA Audit Guide also notes that although the auditor has no responsibility to test the accuracy or completeness of the investment information certified by the qualifying institution, if the auditor becomes aware that the certified information is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise unsatisfactory, further inquiry may be necessary, which might result in additional testing or modification to the auditor s report. In certain instances, a limited-scope audit may no longer be appropriate. If, for example, the auditor becomes aware that adequate year-end valuation procedures have not been performed and, therefore, the financial statements may not be prepared in accordance with GAAP, it is important for the auditor to communicate those findings to the plan administrator. Common Deficiencies in Limited Scope Certifications No Certification or Incomplete Certification The plan administrator instructs the auditor to perform a limited scope audit but does not obtain a certification from the qualified certifying institution. The plan changed custodians during the year, and neither entity certified the investment information. For example, the Plan used Entity X during the 20X5 plan year, but changed to Entity Y on 12/31/X5. Neither Entity X nor Entity Y certified to the assets; for administrative ease the statements of Entity X showed the assets as liquidated and certified as a zero balance at 12/31/X5. Entity Y did not receive the assets until 1/9/X6 so appropriately could not certify as being held by Entity Y at 12/31/X5. The plan changed custodians during the year, and only received a certification from one of the custodians. Omissions and Errors in the Certification The certification does not include the plan name. The certification is not attached to plan investment information, so it s not clear what information is certified. The qualified certifying institution certifies to either the completeness or accuracy of the investment information, but not both. The certification is not signed. The certification is signed by an individual who is not authorized to represent the qualified institution. The certification(s) do not cover the entire period under audit. The certification does not cover the stated period (for example, the plan was terminated during the year (on 6/30/X6) but the certification states that it is as of and for the period ended 12/31/X6). The certification does not include all investments (for example, it covers separate account assets but does not cover general account assets). The certification is issued by an entity other than a qualified institution (for example, a recordkeeper that is not a bank, trust company, or insurance company) or similar institution, and is not acting as an agent

for a qualified institution (for example, brokerage arms of certain banks/providers or investment companies). Qualifying language that conflicts with the assertion that certified information is accurate and complete (for example, a certification containing the following disclaimer language may impair the usefulness of the certification: Values reflected for publicly-traded assets are from unaffiliated financial industry sources believed to be reliable. Values for non-publicly-traded assets may be determined from other unaffiliated sources. Assets for which a current value is unavailable may be reflected at the last reported price, at par, or may be shown as having nominal or no value. Reported values may not be the price at which an asset may be sold. Asset values are updated as pricing becomes available from external sources, and may be updated less frequently than statements are generated. Information Improperly Certified Plan investments are certified by two different custodians when only one of them held the assets. The incorrect entity certifies the plan s investment information. This can happen when plans change custodians/trustees or merge with another plan. For example, Plan A merged into Plan B on 1/5/X6, and the transfer of Plan A s assets occurred on 1/15/X6. Prior to the merger Entity A was custodian for Plan A, and Entity B was custodian for Plan B; Entity B is the custodian for the merged Plan B. Entity B backdated the merger transaction to 12/31/X5 for a smooth transition on recordkeeping and certified all investment information, even though the processing and actual receipt of Plan A s assets had not yet occurred, and Entity A still held those assets. The certified statements include assets that are held by a separate custodian. Incorrect/Improper Information Certified The entity certifies current year ESOP units and activity, but the shares are certified at prior year values. Plan investments are improperly categorized in the certification (for example, the plan invests in a hedge fund that is listed in the certification as mutual funds). The certification includes investments purchased after year-end. For example, the certifying entity bought investments on 12/31/X5 related to payroll deferrals that were made and transmitted on 1/1/X6, before they received the cash, and included them in the 12/31/X5 certification. The certified statements list the incorrect asset value due to errors in cutoff. For example, a plan purchases assets on 12/30/X5 (trade date) but the entity certifies the asset value is zero assuming the transaction will take 2 days to settle, but the actual settlement date was 12/31/X5. The certified trust statements include contribution and investment activity from the next period, indicating poor cutoff.

Limited Scope Certification Example limited scope certification that complies with the requirements of 29CFR 2520.103-5c. What to look for Prepared by a qualified institution (or authorized agent). ABC Institution [letterhead] Specifies the plan name. Attached to (or included with) the plan investment information being certified. Covers the entire period under audit. The institution certifies to both the completeness and accuracy of the investment information (no caveats or other qualifying language). Signed by an authorized representative of the qualified institution. Re: XYZ Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan And Trust Enclosed are the certified Trust Statements for the above referenced Plan(s) for the following periods: Certified Trust Statement covering the annual period through 10/31/X5 and Certified Trust Statement beginning 11/01/X5 through the end of the reporting period ABC National Bank hereby certifies that the information furnished pursuant to 29CFR2520.103-5c is complete and accurate. Please contact your Plan Manager if you have questions. Sincerely, Jane Doe Jane Doe Vice President, ABC National Bank