CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS MANAGEMENT & EOT DELAYS ANALYSIS Presented by : Hany Ismail, MSc, PMP
CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS MANAGEMENT EOT DELAYS ANALYSIS LESSON 7 TIME IMPACT WINDOW DELAY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE TIME IMPACT WINDOW ANALYSIS
Agenda Introduction. Why is TIA preferred technique? Analysis Technique Analysis Technique Steps Smart s Time Periods
Introduction Time Impact Analysis Technique is Actual Based Approach Which depends on the actual consequence and dates happened in the site during the execution not only the planning schedule. TIA is widely recognized by the construction industry as the most accepted method to quantify schedule delay. In this method the analyst develops and adds a model of the change to an approved schedule to quantify the delay to project completion
TIA is preferred delay analysis technique TIA is preferred delay analysis technique for the following reasons it allows assessment of the actual state of progress at the time the delay event occurred. the responsibility for delay prior to the impact of the delaying event is not material to the calculation of the effect of the delaying event itself. It determines whether the delay event impacted the critical path. The exact impact of the delay event can be calculated.
Analysis Technique analysis is a time impact technique which focus on the impact of delays in specific periods of time, identifying gains or losses ( delays and recovery ) to the actual critical and sub-critical paths as they occur with each period of time. The project life cycle is divided into a series of consecutive time s.
Analysis Technique Cont For Each window - Each window is analyzed to identify the activities that were impacted, delay or recovery and the results are investigated to identify the events that caused the deviation in progress. - Analysis steps
Technique Analysis Steps Step 1 : Incorporate delay events that have been occurred in the period Step 2 : Establish the impact on time for Completion.
Technique Analysis Steps Step 3 : Update the impacted programme with progress with in the window period. Construction Claims Management & EOT Delay Analysis Step 4 : Establish the impact on the Time for Completion. D1 : Impact delay period due to Employer Delay Events D2 : Impact delay period due to Contactor Delays from the update.
CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS MANAGEMENT EOT DELAYS ANALYSIS CASE STUDY BANK XYZ PROJECT
Technique Case study General Information Project Planned Start Date : 12,March,2012. Project Planned Finish Date : 22,April,. Available Updates Programme : 4 Programme
Technique Case study- 0 Start (1) Finish (2) Duration (3) = 2-1 Prog. Source Programme Project Finish date Contractor Delay Employer Total Entitlemen t P0 Appr. Baseline A.01 22,April, W0 31 P1 P0+Delay Events 13,May, P2 P1+Progress update on DD 14,May, Total Entitlement
Technique Case study- 1 Start (1) Finish (2) Duration (3) = 2-1 Prog. Source Programme Project Finish date Contractor Delay Employer Total Entitlemen t P3 Approved P2 14,May, W1 264 P4 P3+Delay Events 25,May, P5 P4+Progress update on DD 3,Jun, Total Entitlement
Technique Case study- 2 Start (1) Finish (2) Duration (3) = 2-1 Prog. Source Programme Project Finish date Contractor Delay Employer Total Entitlemen t P6 Approved P5 3,Jun, W2 264 P7 P6+Delay Events 9,July, P8 P7+Progress update on DD 21,July, Total Entitlement
Technique Case study- 3 Start (1) Finish (2) Duration (3) = 2-1 Prog. Source Programme Project Finish date Contractor Delay Employer Total Entitlemen t P9 Approved P8 21,July, W3 79 P10 P9+Delay Events 15,Aug, P11 P10+Progres s update on DD 15,Sep., Total Entitlement
Technique Case study- Summary Start Finish window Duration 0 10-Mar-12 10-Apr-12 31 window 1 11-Apr-12 31-Dec-12 264 2 1-Jan-13 1-Feb-13 31 3 2-Feb-13 22-Apr-13 79 Programme P0 P1 Programme Approved BaseLine P0+Delay Events Project Finish Date Contractor Delay Delay Employer Delay 22-Apr-13 0 0 13-May-13 21 Total Entitlement P2 P1+Progress update on DD 14-May-13 1 22 P3 Approved P2 14-May-13 P4 P3+Delay Events 25-May-13 11 P5 P4+Progress update on DD 3-Jun-13 9 20 P6 Approved P5 3-Jun-13 P7 P6+Delay Events 9-Jul-13 36 P8 P7+Progress update on DD 21-Jul-13 12 48 P9 Approved P8 21-Jul-13 P10 P9+Delay Events 15-Aug-13 25 P11 P10+Progress update on DD Total Entitlement 15-Sep-13 31 56
Technique Case study- Conclusion According to the previous analysis the contractor entitled for (93) Calendar day as Excusable Delays Total Entitlement 146 Calendar Day Excusable 93 Day Non-Excusable 53 Day Compensable Non- Compensable
Thank You We hope you enjoy our lecture today Hope to receive your feedback and recommendations Contact Info INFO@PLANNINGENGINEER.NET Mobile : +20 1277767728 /PlanningEngineerDotNet /groups/4809645