INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

Similar documents
Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives

Overall ROR: 30,000(0.20) + 70,000(0.14) = 100,000(x) x = 15.8% Prepare a tabulation of cash flow for the alternatives shown below.

IE463 Chapter 3. Objective: INVESTMENT APPRAISAL (Applications of Money-Time Relationships)

Chapter 7 Rate of Return Analysis

i* = IRR i*? IRR more sign changes Passes: unique i* = IRR

IE463 Chapter 4. Objective: COMPARING INVESTMENT AND COST ALTERNATIVES

Engineering Economics

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

IE 343 Midterm Exam 2

COMPARING ALTERNATIVES

Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives

Chapter 7 Rate of Return Analysis

IE 343 Midterm Exam 2

SOLUTIONS TO SELECTED PROBLEMS. Student: You should work the problem completely before referring to the solution. CHAPTER 1

Engineering Economy. Lecture 8 Evaluating a Single Project IRR continued Payback Period. NE 364 Engineering Economy

INVESTMENT CRITERIA. Net Present Value (NPV)

ENG2000 Chapter 17 Evaluating and Comparing Projects: The IRR. ENG2000: R.I. Hornsey CM_2: 1

IE 343 Section 1 Engineering Economy Exam 2 Review Problems Solutions Instructor: Tian Ni March 30, 2012

Chapter 8. Rate of Return Analysis. Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 5th edition

Comparison and Selection among Alternatives Created By Eng.Maysa Gharaybeh

Chapter 15 Inflation

Department of Humanities. Sub: Engineering Economics and Costing (BHU1302) (4-0-0) Syllabus

Inflation Homework. 1. Life = 4 years

CHAPTER 7: ENGINEERING ECONOMICS

Chapter One. Definition and Basic terms and terminology of engineering economy

IE2140 Engineering Economy Tutorial 3 (Lab 1) Using Excel Financial Functions for Project Evaluation

Chapter 6 Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives 6-1

IE 343 Midterm Exam. March 7 th Closed book, closed notes.

Lecture 5 Present-Worth Analysis

ECLT 5930/SEEM 5740: Engineering Economics Second Term

Present Worth Analysis

Carefully read all directions given in a problem. Please show all work for all problems, and clearly label all formulas.

CAPITAL BUDGETING Shenandoah Furniture, Inc.

TECHNO-ECONOMICS OF OIL & GAS PROJECT. Dr. ARSEGIANTO

Sixth Edition. Global Edition CONTEMPORARY ENGINEERING ECONOMICS. Chan S. Park Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Auburn University

Chapter 13 Breakeven and Payback Analysis

7 - Engineering Economic Analysis

# 6. Comparing Alternatives

Nominal and Effective Interest Rates

Chapter 7. Net Present Value and Other Investment Rules

MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS Circle the correct answer on this test paper and record it on the computer answer sheet.

8: Economic Criteria

Other Analysis Techniques. Future Worth Analysis (FWA) Benefit-Cost Ratio Analysis (BCRA) Payback Period

Chapter 4. Establishing the Planning Horizon & MARR. Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 5th edition

Financial Management Bachelors of Business Administration Study Notes & Tutorial Questions Chapter 1: Investment & Project Appraisal

ACCTG101 Revision MODULES 10 & 11 LITTLE NOTABLES EXCLUSIVE - VICKY TANG

Chapter 10 The Basics of Capital Budgeting: Evaluating Cash Flows ANSWERS TO SELECTED END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

Mutually Exclusive Choose at most one From the Set

29/09/2010. Outline Module 4. Selection of Alternatives. Proposals for Investment Alternatives. Module 4: Present Worth Analysis

University 18 Lessons Financial Management. Unit 2: Capital Budgeting Decisions

Dr. Maddah ENMG 400 Engineering Economy 07/06/09. Chapter 5 Present Worth (Value) Analysis

FREDERICK OWUSU PREMPEH

1 Week Recap Week 2

Chapter 7: Investment Decision Rules

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND LIFE CYCLE COSTING SECTION I

Tax Homework. A B C Installed cost $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 Net Uniform annual before 3,000 6,000 10,000

Investment Decision Criteria. Principles Applied in This Chapter. Disney s Capital Budgeting Decision

CS 413 Software Project Management LECTURE 8 COST MANAGEMENT FOR SOFTWARE PROJECT - II CASH FLOW ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

Seminar on Financial Management for Engineers. Institute of Engineers Pakistan (IEP)

MENG 547 Energy Management & Utilization

Economic Decision Making Using Fuzzy Numbers Shih-Ming Lee, Kuo-Lung Lin, Sushil Gupta. Florida International University Miami, Florida

Global Financial Management

Investment Decision Criteria. Principles Applied in This Chapter. Learning Objectives

MGT201 Lecture No. 11

Financial Mathematics II. ANNUITY (Series of payments or receipts) Definition ( ) m = parts of the year

AFM 271. Midterm Examination #2. Friday June 17, K. Vetzal. Answer Key

Analyzing Project Cash Flows. Chapter 12

IE 360 Engineering Economic Analysis Exam 2 Sample Test - Dr. Park Copyright 1998

Engineering Economics, ENGR 610 Final Exam (35%)

FINANCE FOR EVERYONE SPREADSHEETS

CHAPTER 6 MAKING CAPITAL INVESTMENT DECISIONS

CHAPTER 6 MAKING CAPITAL INVESTMENT DECISIONS

International Project Management. prof.dr MILOŠ D. MILOVANČEVIĆ

Describe the importance of capital investments and the capital budgeting process

LO 1: Cash Flow. Cash Payback Technique. Equal Annual Cash Flows: Cost of Capital Investment / Net Annual Cash Flow = Cash Payback Period

Capital Budgeting Decisions

The Mathematics of Interest An Example Assume a bank pays 8% interest on a $100 deposit made today. How much

Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news

Question: Insurance doesn t have much depreciation or inventory. What accounting methods affect return on book equity for insurance?

Commercestudyguide.com Capital Budgeting. Definition of Capital Budgeting. Nature of Capital Budgeting. The process of Capital Budgeting

Chapter 5 Present Worth Analysis

Corporate Finance, Module 4: Net Present Value vs Other Valuation Models

KING FAHAD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS COLLEGE OF ENVIROMENTAL DESGIN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

Introduction to Engineering Economic Analysis DR. AHMED ELYAMANY

Six Ways to Perform Economic Evaluations of Projects

What Is a Project? How Do We Justify a Project? 1.011Project Evaluation: Comparing Costs & Benefits Carl D. Martland

3 Leasing Decisions. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

BFC2140: Corporate Finance 1

Finance 402: Problem Set 5 Solutions

Multiple Choice: 5 points each

Chapter 1. Engineering Economy is a collection of techniques that simplify comparisons of

Capital Budgeting Decisions

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT PROBLEMS. Problem No.1

FINANCIAL DECISION RULES FOR PROJECT EVALUATION SPREADSHEETS

CAPITAL BUDGETING AND THE INVESTMENT DECISION

Financial Analysis Refresher

Strategic Investment & Finance Solutions to Exercises

Lesson 7 and 8 THE TIME VALUE OF MONEY. ACTUALIZATION AND CAPITALIZATION. CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES

UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA PEPERIKSAAN SEMESTER II TEST- 1 SESI 2010/2011 MATA PELAJARAN : EKONOMI PEMBUATAN (MANUFACTURING ECONOMY) B 0 5 0

The formula for the net present value is: 1. NPV. 2. NPV = CF 0 + CF 1 (1+ r) n + CF 2 (1+ r) n

Transcription:

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

Introduction You put money in a bank account and expect to get a return 1 percent You can think of investment/business/project in the same way Every investment/business/project has their own return, however choose the largest return

Internal Rate Of Return Analysis IRR (internal rate of return): produce rate of return while NPV equals to zero The value of the interest rate (return), i *, can be calculated by applying present worth analysis or annual worth analysis or future worth analysis

Equation NPV = 0 Pw inflow PW outflow = 0 Equation PWinflow AW inflow FW inflow = PWoutflow = AWoutflow = Fwoutflow You can use trial error to find rate of return by applying interpolation

Single Alternative You may have to estimate rate of return (i) first then select the decision The value of I will be compared to MARR value What is MARR?

Suppose you inherited Rp 500Million

Assume you have 2 alternatives leave the money in the savings account to earn 6% interest over 10 years this will be your opportunity cost rate or minimum return required (MARR) for any investment. Opening steak restaurant will earn 20% return over 5 years

Summary This business will bring in a 20 % rate of return on investment. This business will result in a net surplus Rp. 100.000.000 in NPW.

Decision Criterion If i* MARR The alternative deserves to be selected

Example Baker co has planed to purchase a machine worth to Rp.39.000.000. The annual saving will be estimated at Rp.7.000.000. It has 7 years of useful life and at the end of its useful life the company will sold and approximately worth to Rp.8.000.000. if Baker Co has chosen 8 % as MARR, does the Baker co s decision of buying a machine profitable?

Using Present Worth Analysis PW inflow = PW outflow 8.000.000(P/F,i*,7) + 7.000.000(P/A,i*,7) = 39.000.000 if i*= 9%, then 8.000.000(0,54703) + 7.000.000(5,03295) = 39.606.890 if i*= 10%, then 8.000.000(0,51316) + 7.000.000(4,86842) = 38.184.220

i* PW 9 % 39.606.890 X % 39.000.000 10 % 38.184.220 i* = 9 + x = 9 + 0,426585 = 9,43% Since i* MARR, then the decision is favorable

Using Annual Worth AW inflow = AW outflow 8.000.000(A/F,i*,7) + 7.000.000 = 39.000.000(A/P,i*,7) 8.000.000(A/F,i*,7) - 39.000.000(A/P,i*,7) = 7.000.000 if i*= 9% 8.000.000(0,10869) 39.000.000 (0,19869) = -6.159.390 if i*= 10% 8.000.000(0,10541) 39.000.000 (0,20541) = -7.167.710

i* AW 9 % -6.159.390 X % -7.000.000 10 % -7.167.710 i* =9 + x = 9 + 0,833674 = 9,83% Since i* MARR, then the decision is favorable

Using Future Worth FW Inflow = FW outflow 8.000.000 + 7.000.000 (F/A,i*,7) = 39.000.000(F/P,i*,7) 39.000.000(F/P,i*,7) - 7.000.000 (F/A,i*,7) = 8.000.000 if i*= 9% 39.000.000 (1,82804) 7.000.000(9,20043) = 6.890.550 if i*= 10% 39.000.000 (1,94872) 7.000.000(9,48717) = 9.589.890

i* FW 9 % 6.890.550 X % 8.000.000 10 % 9.589.890 i* = 9 + x = 9 + 0,411008 = 9,41% Since i* MARR, then the decision is favorable

The different results When we applied present worth, annual worth, atau future worth to select the decision, the probability of having different results still exists and can influence to final decision To eliminate this problem, you may calculate using incremental analysis

Incremental Analysis 1. Order the alternatives ascendingly 2. Estimate the first I You have to compare the first alternative with d nothing DN) in first iteration If the estimation produces i*< MARR, then DN is acceptable If the estimation produces i* MARR, the first alternative will change DN position as acceptable decision, The later alternative or may be second alternative (challenger) will be benchmarked to first alternative

3. Calculate incremental cash flow from both alternative at a certain period using this formula Incremental cash flow=second alternative s cash flow first alternative s cash flow 4. Calculate i* dari from incremental cash flow, you may apply linear interpolation 5. If i* < MARR, the first alternative is till acceptable, however if i* MARR, the second alternative will replace former acceptable decision and next alternative will be challenger alternative 6. Repeat step 3 to 5 until all alternatives has been benchmarked one by one. The last acceptable result will be final and chosen alternative

Problem : Baker co has planed to purchase a machine to increase the productivity rate. 2 alternatives has rise up with 10 yeas useful life If annual MARR 9%, which machine should be invested? Mesin Initial Annual profit Salvage value (Rp.) investment (Rp.) (Rp.) X 4.000.000 1.000.000 2.500.000 Y 12.000.000 3.000.000 3.000.000

First step 1 (sorting the alternatives) The alternatives should be sorted ascendingly 1. DN alternatives (investment = 0) 2. first alternative machine X (initial value of machine X = 4.000.000) 3. second alternative machine Y (Initial value of machine Y = 12.000.000)

Step 2 Estimate first I Membandingkan DN dengan Mesin X Step 3 (calculate incremental cash flow)

Step 4 (calculate i* form incremental cash flow) 1.000.000(P/A,i*,9) + 3.500.000 (P/F,i*,10) = 4.000.000 if i*= 20% 1.000.000 (4,03097) + 3.500.000(0,16151) = 4.596.255 if i*= 25% 1.000.000 (3,46313) + 3.500.000(0,10737) = 3.838.925

Using linear interpolation for 4.000.000 can gain internal rate of return : i* = 20 + x = 24% (Step 5 feasibility analysis) since i* MARR, then purchasing machine x is acceptable (Step 6) purchase machine X deserves to be selected the second alternative will be challenger alternative

Repeat step 3 to 6 Membandingkan Mesin X dengan Mesin Y Step 3 (calculate incremental cash flow)

Step 4 (calculate i* form incremental cash flow) 2.000.000(P/A,i*,9) + 2.500.000 (P/F,i*,10) = 8.000.000 if i*= 20% 2.000.000 (4,03097) + 2.500.000(0,16151) = 8.465.715 If i*= 25% 2.000.000 (3,46313) + 2.500.000(0,10737) = 7.194.685

Step 5 (feasibility test) Using linear interpolation for 4.000.000 can gain internal rate of return : i*= 20 + x = 22% since i* MARR, then choose machine Y.