3DEP Coalition Meeting. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems November 10, 2016

Similar documents
3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Status and Plans. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems June 26, 2017

National Elevation Data for National Flood Insurance Policy; NFIP & 3DEP Efforts John JB Byrd of John M. Palatiello & Associates, Inc.

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

The LiDAR Program in Missouri Branson LiDAR Workshop. Ray Fox Geospatial Liaison to Missouri Chair, MGISAC Data Development

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. December 2010 FEMA FLOOD MAPS

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

Flood Risk Assessment in the

Discovery Report. Cache River Watershed, Alexander, Johnson, Pulaski, and Union Counties, Illinois

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

RichSmith_slate-FEMA_320x240.wmv.

CNMS and FOA: A Year in Review. Rick Sacbibit, P.E. Andy Read, CFM FEMA HQ, Risk Analysis Division June 4, 2015

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Abington Township Public Meeting

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

State of South Carolina Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

U.S. Updates: Climate Change, Maintenance and Investigations

County of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan, 2015 Update

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

On March 21, 2014, President Obama signed the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 into law.

Table 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

NFIP Mapping Issues. Wendy Lathrop, PLS, CFM. Cadastral Consulting, LLC

Tarrant County, TX Monthly Progress Report No. 33 (FEMA Contract No, HSFEHQ-09-D-0369) Task Order 01

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Orange County Flood Insurance Study Update

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

FEMA s Flood Mapping Program

State of Vermont Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Project Application

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Mitigation in a Changing Environment: Preserving our Heritage while Investing in Mitigation for a More Resilient Nation

SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA

Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study. Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo

Floodplain Management Plan

Calhoun County Flood Insurance Study Update

Enough about me! Topics Covered

King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016

What Was Updated in 2004 in Hennepin Countywide Maps?

THE $64,000 FLOOD INSURANCE BILL

Thurston County, WA Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan Annual Progress Report CRS Activity 510

N.C. Floodplain Mapping Program

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

DECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Flood Solutions. Summer 2018

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Southwest Florida Discovery Kick-Off Meeting. February 4, 2014

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Mercer County Kick-off Meeting December 6, 2006

Improving Flood Hazard Identification & Flood Risk Communication: Lessons Learned from Dam Failures in South Carolina

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

LOCAL OFFICIALS MEETING Lake Wausau Physical Map Revision MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN FEBRUARY 9, 2017

FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING SCIENCE. Gardner Bent, U.S. Geological Survey, New England Water Science Center

ROI for Joining CRS. Floodplain Management Association Conference. Sacramento, CA. September 2016

FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE CORRIDOR EVALUATION

Suwannee River Water Management District

Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force: Final Report

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program

The maximum allowable valley storage decrease for the 100-year flood and Standard Project Flood are 0.0% and 5.0%, respectively.

DRAFT. Prioritizing the Implementation of Harris County Flood Control District 2018 Bond Projects

WASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS

PARK COUNTY, WYOMING AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Outreach Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program. GAFM Technical Conference Flood Risk Outreach and Policy Session

Physical Map Revisions as a Result of Updated Coastal Flood Hazards

Preliminary Work Map Release

Not Your Average Risk Assessment: Multi-Stage Risk Assessments for Sites in the Passaic River Basin Stuart Geiger, CFM Joseph Ruggeri, PE, CFM

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Silver Jackets - Flood Risk Management Program

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Flood Smart Communities

The National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: An Introduction and Discussion of the RDO Role. October 2, :00-3:15 pm ET

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

Wildfire and Flood Hazards, Using GIS Tools to Assess Risk

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECT (CAP) Federal Interest Determination

September Three Steps for Implementing a Complete Flood Management Plan

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

Meeting the Nation s Levee Challenges

ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS

Transcription:

+ 3DEP Coalition Meeting Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems November 10, 2016

+ 2 3DEP Status 2023

+ 3 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Mission Critical Applications Geologic Hazards Infrastructure Management Flood Risk Management Aviation Safety Precision Forestry Alternative Energy Archaeology

+ 4 3DEP For America s Infrastructure The significant challenge of improving the Nation s infrastructure depends on high-quality elevation data Lidar point cloud (top) and a derived bare-earth digital elevation model (bottom) for Denver, CO Uses include: Route, grade, line-of-sight, and utility surveys and corridor mapping Terrain and other obstruction identification for aviation Dam, levee, and coastal-structure failure modeling and mitigation Hydraulic and hydrologic modeling Evaluations of geologic, coastal, and other natural hazards, and geotechnical evaluations Permit application and construction plan development and evaluation Drainage issues and cut-and-fill estimate requirements Vegetation, topographic, and geomorphologic feature analysis As-built model development Preliminary engineering, estimate development, and quantity estimation activities Bridge site selection Base-map and elevation model creation

+ 5 6.7% of the lower 49 and territories added in FY16

+ 6 3DEP Data Contracted in FY16 PRELIMINARY Results Subject to Change Broad Agency Announcement Other partnerships TOTAL 3DEP Funds USGS FEMA NRCS Partner Contributions Other Feds Non- Federal $6.5 M $2.1 M $3.9 M $0.8 M $14.4 M $12.5 M $15.2 M $2.7 M $9.9 M $6.1 M $0.6 M $2.0 M $18.6 M $2.6 M $9.2 M $11.9 M $10.0 M $1.4 M $16.4 M $31.2 M $17.8 M Total Project Value Square Miles $27.8 M 121.0 K $21.2 M 82.1 K $49.0 M 203.1 K Additional investments were made in FY16 that are being contracted in FY17: $44.8M Lidar; $1.2M for Alaska IfSAR FY15 $39M and 150,000 square miles

+ 7 + 7 Alaska IfSAR 77% Available or In Work

+ 8 3DEP Funding BALLPARK Estimate of Gap Across All Partners/Total Program Includes Alaska IfSAR Complete Acquisition in 2020 (Accelerated program) Complete Acquisition in 2023 (8 year program)

+ 9 3DEP Funding FY16 USGS Budget Estimates Includes Alaska IfSAR USGS Base budget (includes acquisition and operations) Increase (FY16 enacted, FY17 proposed President s budget) Total USGS 3DEP budget FY17 $21.4 M $25.7M $4.3 M $4.9 M $25.7 M $30.6 M Funding Gap Estimates House 17 mark: "an increase of $2,194,000 is provided for 3-D elevation mapping" Senate 17 mark: "program increases include $2,000,000 for 3D Elevation program and $2,500,000 for Alaska mapping program" Complete Acquisition in 2020 (Accelerated program) Complete Acquisition in 2023 (8 year program)

+ 10 FY17 Broad Agency Announcement Preliminary results of proposals 36 proposals in 23 states Total value of ~$28.4M ~121,000 sq miles 27 propose to use GPSC, 9 propose to use partner contract Partners offering $17.3M and seeking $11.1M from 3DEP Getting ready to award first round for $2.8M with $2.1 through GPSC

+ 11 BAA Intersection with Federal AOIs Example

+ 12 + 12 BAA Intersection with Federal AOIs

+ 13 Moving to a more systematic approach What needs to change? Move from an annual, opportunistic process to a unified multi-year plan Move from patchwork irregular acquisition footprints to some defined unit (cell-based, watershed, county etc.) Capture more non-federal investments through greater lead times for planning Defined units facilitate planning and understanding costs, allow for improved reporting and justification of investments Eventually plan nationwide coverage Move from this to something more like this

+ 14 Development of a Multi-Year Plan Tasking from May 2016 3DEP Executive Forum 3DEP Working Group tasked to develop a multi-year plan Initial progress report at October 20 meeting Timeline Recommended standardized /planning delivery unit via national tiling scheme January, 2017 Each agency define planned data acquisition and requirements for minimum next year March, 2017 Development of a Communication Plan / Strategy March, 2017 Present recommendations to Executive Forum March, 2017 Goal to begin implementing in FY18

+ 15 Accelerating the 3DEP Unified Plan Refining and Strengthening Federal Best Practices As a Federal community Implement a Federal-wide multiyear data acquisition plan 3DEP budget initiative In our agencies Participate in 3DEP budget initiative Seek non-federal partners via the BAA for any Federal data investments Ensure that investments in data meet 3DEP quality levels Implement an agency policy to work within the unified Federal 3DEP plan for data acquisition and sharing Coordinate internally to link regional/field offices into 3DEP data acquisition process Share 3DEP-quality datasets acquired outside of the data acquisition process to be ingestion into national holdings Sign 3DEP governance memorandum of understanding (when available) Assign agency representatives to 3DEP Executive Forum and Working Group Promote 3DEP to agency constituents to participate in or support the national 3DEP effort Encourage or require that Federal grant monies used for elevation data acquisition result in the data being collected to 3DEP standards and contributed to the national holdings

+ 16 Thank you!