Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Hasil Common Effect Model

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

MỘT SỐ KHUYẾT TẬT CỦA MÔ HÌNH HỒI QUY

Openness and Inflation

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

esia/perkembangan/

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

LAMPIRAN 1: OUTPUT SPSS

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

Nexus between stock exchange index and exchange rates

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Supplementary Materials for

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

Trading Volume and Fama-French Three Factor Model on Excess Return. Empirical Evidence from Nairobi Security Exchange

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

THE DETERMINANT OF INFLATION IN INDONESIA: PARTIAL ADJUSTMENT MODEL APPROACH

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

Can the Taylor Rule Describe the Monetary Policy in China?

Time Series Analysis of Inflation and RBI Policy Rates

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

The Estimation Model for Measuring Performance of Stock Mutual Funds Based on ARCH / GARCH Model

An Analysis of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Foreign Exchange Rate

Does it influence? Macro variables on stock returns.

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

Factors Affecting the Movement of Stock Market: Evidence from India

The Effects of Oil Price Volatility on Some Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria: Application of Garch and Var Models

Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan

Mathematical Model for Estimating Income Tax Revenues in the Philippines through Regression Analysis Using Matrices

A Test of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem Using Market Evaluations of Kazakhstani Banks

EXTERNAL FACTORS INFLUENCE ON INFLATION: THE CASE OF ROMANIA

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

The Impact of Earnings Announcement Surprise on Stock Prices

ARDL Approach for Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Pakistan ( ): An Empirical Study

Foreign Exchange Reserves: Bangladesh Perspective

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

MICROFINANCE LENDING TO SHGs AND ITS NEXUS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN INDIA: AN ARDL ANALYSIS

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

Determinants of Merchandise Export Performance in Sri Lanka

NATIONALLY HELD PUBLIC DEBT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: AN APPLICATION TO THE US ECONOMY

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF CORPORATE PROFITABILITY COMPONENTS AND FUTURE EARNINGS

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

An Analysis of the Relationship between Public Spending Components and Private investments in Nigeria

Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Nigeria

X. Einkommensfunktion II

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Economics and Finance 10 ( 2014 )

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Efficiency of Operational Activity of Commercial Banks in Romania

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

Effect of Profitability and Financial Leverage on Capita Structure in Pakistan Textile Firms

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

Transcription:

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran I Data Tahun PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) Luas Sawit (ha) Angkatan Kerja (Jiwa) 1986 24698580 84581 8438 19733 1237717 1987 26991625 106279 10128 22122 1243818 1988 28797996 409895 16538 22979 1243899 1989 30155125 566236 62827 22718 1267197 1990 32296969 661591 73008 24440 1411138 1991 34452601 882715 88740 26182 1450205 1992 36866473 1129266 98448 37698 1549014 1993 38919400 1719405 99109 52119 1621747 1994 41853813 1984511 108476 66424 1682633 1995 45453341 2106779 122280 71771 1713331 1996 49763618 2370619 172091 81966 1752533 1997 54384855 2619652 335228 98896 1725533 1998 51990359 3020296 644135 135176 1787677 1999 53418481 3103129 884419 160247 1901686 2000 54992517 3395910 1829085 87131 1778795 2001 56297049 3681354 2496978 163945 1771550 2002 58860718 3871001 2851082 170008 1827278 2003 60662857 4411370 3545991 180986 1901757 2004 63569412 4437965 4023741 184553 1954343 2005 66546697 4096567 5633475 192547 1993428 2006 70286937 7256213 5605522 220406 1969298 2007 74521663 4579583 6627638 250500 2143823 2008 78559608 5201255 7611365 308596 2157549 2009 82300545 6339180 9813786 289334 2200895 2010 86065854 8381742 10199052 522508 2197325 2011 90797590 10004669 12205479 625532 2233195 2012 96161928 13177576 19390833 773945 2182524 2013 101980339 17266077 28194885 906486 2140166 2014 107113786 24474623 30340629 929360 2320229 2015 112261168 30420152 55583763 1046212 2357224 2016 118184632 40383786 75430409 1055656 2388758 Sumber: Badan Pusat Statistik Kalimantan Barat (diolah)

Lampiran II Hasil Uji Asumsi Klasik 1. Uji Normalitas 12 10 8 6 4 2 Series: Residuals Sample 1986 2016 Observations 31 Mean -1.60e-15 Median 0.002643 Maximum 0.091157 Minimum -0.093964 Std. Dev. 0.038842 Skewness -0.179561 Kurtosis 3.158439 Jarque-Bera 0.199010 Probability 0.905286 0-0.100-0.075-0.050-0.025 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 2. Uji Autokorelasi Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test: F-statistic 1.442145 Prob. F(2,24) 0.2562 Obs*R-squared 3.325845 Prob. Chi-Square(2) 0.1896 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID Date: 02/26/18 Time: 16:59 Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero. C -0.569250 2.047607-0.278008 0.7834 LOG(PMDN) -0.002193 0.018946-0.115760 0.9088 LOG(PMA) 0.000563 0.012735 0.044206 0.9651 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) -0.005836 0.027430-0.212743 0.8333 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 0.046046 0.161008 0.285988 0.7773 RESID(-1) 0.319472 0.207914 1.536559 0.1375 RESID(-2) -0.209458 0.205638-1.018579 0.3186 R-squared 0.107285 Mean dependent var -1.60E-15 Adjusted R-squared -0.115893 S.D. dependent var 0.038842 S.E. of regression 0.041031 Akaike info criterion -3.353313 Sum squared resid 0.040404 Schwarz criterion -3.029509 Log likelihood 58.97635 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.247761 F-statistic 0.480715 Durbin-Watson stat 1.960414 Prob(F-statistic) 0.816001

3. Uji Heteroskedastisitas Heteroskedasticity Test: Glejser F-statistic 0.976682 Prob. F(4,26) 0.4373 Obs*R-squared 4.049543 Prob. Chi-Square(4) 0.3993 Scaled explained SS 3.760235 Prob. Chi-Square(4) 0.4394 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: ARESID Date: 02/26/18 Time: 17:00 C -1.703265 1.213577-1.403508 0.1723 LOG(PMDN) 0.004033 0.011366 0.354828 0.7256 LOG(PMA) -0.010327 0.007421-1.391659 0.1758 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) -0.006109 0.015544-0.392983 0.6975 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 0.131110 0.095255 1.376406 0.1804 R-squared 0.130630 Mean dependent var 0.029540 Adjusted R-squared -0.003119 S.D. dependent var 0.024636 S.E. of regression 0.024675 Akaike info criterion -4.419382 Sum squared resid 0.015830 Schwarz criterion -4.188093 Log likelihood 73.50041 Hannan-Quinn criter. -4.343987 F-statistic 0.976682 Durbin-Watson stat 1.246450 Prob(F-statistic) 0.437251

4. Uji Multikolinearitas a. R 2 Majemuk Dependent Variable: LOG(PDRB) Date: 02/26/18 Time: 17:00 C 8.115570 2.052040 3.954880 0.0005 LOG(PMDN) 0.036448 0.019220 1.896391 0.0691 LOG(PMA) 0.038356 0.012548 3.056810 0.0051 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) 0.162418 0.026283 6.179481 0.0000 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 0.467245 0.161067 2.900932 0.0075 R-squared 0.992461 Mean dependent var 17.85304 Adjusted R-squared 0.991302 S.D. dependent var 0.447354 S.E. of regression 0.041723 Akaike info criterion -3.368857 Sum squared resid 0.045260 Schwarz criterion -3.137569 Log likelihood 57.21728 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.293463 F-statistic 855.7245 Durbin-Watson stat 1.486680 b. R 2 Parsial Dependent Variable: LOG(PMDN) Date: 02/26/18 Time: 17:01 C -35.65364 19.36803-1.840850 0.0767 LOG(PMA) 0.204357 0.119330 1.712541 0.0983 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) 0.190466 0.260617 0.730826 0.4712 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 3.156959 1.493990 2.113106 0.0440 R-squared 0.924796 Mean dependent var 14.94062 Adjusted R-squared 0.916440 S.D. dependent var 1.445264 S.E. of regression 0.417778 Akaike info criterion 1.212181 Sum squared resid 4.712538 Schwarz criterion 1.397212 Log likelihood -14.78881 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.272496 F-statistic 110.6749 Durbin-Watson stat 0.653013

Dependent Variable: LOG(PMA) Date: 02/26/18 Time: 17:02 C -49.57928 29.99172-1.653099 0.1099 LOG(PMDN) 0.479451 0.279965 1.712541 0.0983 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) 1.024002 0.351666 2.911860 0.0071 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 3.069298 2.398690 1.279573 0.2116 R-squared 0.946818 Mean dependent var 13.94840 Adjusted R-squared 0.940909 S.D. dependent var 2.632460 S.E. of regression 0.639916 Akaike info criterion 2.064953 Sum squared resid 11.05628 Schwarz criterion 2.249984 Log likelihood -28.00677 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.125269 F-statistic 160.2304 Durbin-Watson stat 0.553812 Dependent Variable: LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) Date: 02/26/18 Time: 17:02 C -28.24985 14.00714-2.016817 0.0538 LOG(PMDN) 0.101845 0.139356 0.730826 0.4712 LOG(PMA) 0.233383 0.080149 2.911860 0.0071 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 2.452139 1.080816 2.268785 0.0315 R-squared 0.947637 Mean dependent var 11.85743 Adjusted R-squared 0.941819 S.D. dependent var 1.266537 S.E. of regression 0.305497 Akaike info criterion 0.586161 Sum squared resid 2.519867 Schwarz criterion 0.771191 Log likelihood -5.085491 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.646476 F-statistic 162.8787 Durbin-Watson stat 0.624024

Dependent Variable: LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) Date: 02/26/18 Time: 17:03 C 12.70228 0.189203 67.13586 0.0000 LOG(PMDN) 0.044951 0.021273 2.113106 0.0440 LOG(PMA) 0.018628 0.014558 1.279573 0.2116 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) 0.065297 0.028781 2.268785 0.0315 R-squared 0.943670 Mean dependent var 14.40797 Adjusted R-squared 0.937412 S.D. dependent var 0.199267 S.E. of regression 0.049852 Akaike info criterion -3.039603 Sum squared resid 0.067101 Schwarz criterion -2.854572 Log likelihood 51.11384 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.979287 F-statistic 150.7738 Durbin-Watson stat 0.755442

Lampiran III Hasil Regresi Linier Dependent Variable: PDRB Date: 02/26/18 Time: 16:57 C -29967518 4375220. -6.849375 0.0000 PMDN -0.148318 0.468821-0.316363 0.7543 PMA 0.102034 0.212717 0.479671 0.6355 LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF 37.95083 5.527076 6.866349 0.0000 ANGKATAN_KERJA 44.27884 2.786689 15.88941 0.0000 R-squared 0.989179 Mean dependent var 62232469 Adjusted R-squared 0.987514 S.D. dependent var 26782343 S.E. of regression 2992700. Akaike info criterion 32.80794 Sum squared resid 2.33E+14 Schwarz criterion 33.03923 Log likelihood -503.5231 Hannan-Quinn criter. 32.88333 F-statistic 594.1648 Durbin-Watson stat 1.481922 Hasil Regresi Log Linier Dependent Variable: LOG(PDRB) Date: 02/26/18 Time: 16:58 C 8.115570 2.052040 3.954880 0.0005 LOG(PMDN) 0.036448 0.019220 1.896391 0.0691 LOG(PMA) 0.038356 0.012548 3.056810 0.0051 LOG(LUAS_LAHAN_PRODUKTIF) 0.162418 0.026283 6.179481 0.0000 LOG(ANGKATAN_KERJA) 0.467245 0.161067 2.900932 0.0075 R-squared 0.992461 Mean dependent var 17.85304 Adjusted R-squared 0.991302 S.D. dependent var 0.447354 S.E. of regression 0.041723 Akaike info criterion -3.368857 Sum squared resid 0.045260 Schwarz criterion -3.137569 Log likelihood 57.21728 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.293463 F-statistic 855.7245 Durbin-Watson stat 1.486680