Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada; General Obligation

Similar documents
Summary: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; General Obligation

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California

1

1

Summary: Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX)

Research Update: Iceland Foreign Currency Rating Lowered To 'BBB-' On Mounting Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Commerzbank AG And Dresdner Bank AG Outlooks To Negative On Worsening Credit Conditions; 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed

Research Update: Glitnir Bank Downgraded To 'BBB+' On Weak Economy, Reduced Funding And Earnings Prospects

Research Update: Petroliam Nasional Bhd. Ratings Affirmed; Proposed Notes Assigned 'A-' Rating

Summary: Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX)

Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia

Summary: Windsor, Connecticut; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research. March 12,

1

Summary: San Mateo County Community College District, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, Oregon; Miscellaneous Tax

Parker Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

Glossary Of Islamic Finance Terms

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; General Obligation

Southern California Metropolitan Water District; General Obligation; Water/Sewer

Summary: San Benito, Texas; General Obligation

Shenandoah, Texas; General Obligation

Canton, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation

Hartford County Metropolitan District, Connecticut; General Obligation

Canopius Managing Agents - Syndicate 4444

Leveraged Finance: Standard & Poor s Revises Its Approach To Rating Speculative-Grade Credits

PUBLIC FINANCE. Cranston, Rhode Island. US$6.74 mil GO BANs dtd 10/04/2007 due 10/02/2008. Short Term Rating SP-1+ New

Wicomico County, Maryland; General Obligation

Banco Inbursa S.A. 1

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research

Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

Luzerner Kantonalbank

Mound, MInnesota; General Obligation

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Chicago Board of Education; General Obligation

Connecticut; State Revolving Funds/Pools

Apex Town, North Carolina; General Obligation

S&P Comments On Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2010-H1's Potential Credit Strengths And Risk Considerations

Monrovia, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Linden-Kildare Consolidated Independent School District, Texas; General Obligation

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

Bristol, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Frederick City, Maryland; General Obligation

Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1, Washington; Retail Electric

Nationale Borg-Maatschappij N.V.

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Jacksonville, Florida; General Obligation; Miscellaneous Tax

Burlington, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Santa Monica Public Financing Authority, California Santa Monica; Appropriations; General Obligation

Summary: Fresno, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Sales Tax

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Stonington, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Connecticut; Gas Tax

Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec

Providence Water Supply Board, Rhode Island; Water/Sewer

Lyndhurst Township, New Jersey; General Obligation

Albany County Airport Authority, New York Albany International Airport; Airport

Illinois Finance Authority Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group; Joint Criteria; System

Montebello Public Financing Authority Montebello, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Springfield, Michigan; General Obligation

Brightwaters Village, New York; General Obligation

Bay City, Michigan; General Obligation

Big Changes In Standard & Poor's Rating Criteria

(/en_us/web/guest/home) MidMichigan Health, MI Bond Rating Outlook Revised To Positive On Operational Performance, Solid Balance Sheet Metrics

Oak Park Village, Illinois; General Obligation

Tacoma, Washington; Retail Electric

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

St. Marys County, Maryland; General Obligation

Fort Bend Independent School District, Texas; CP; General Obligation; School State Program

Illinois Housing Development Authority; Multifamily Whole Loan

Dominion Resources Inc. And Subsidiaries Downgraded To 'BBB+' On Acquisition Of Questar Corp.; Outlook Stable

General Criteria: Rating Implications Of Exchange Offers And Similar Restructurings, Update

Research Update: Ratings Lowered On Three Mortgage Insurer Groups: Old Republic, PMI, And Radian

Smithfield, Rhode Island; General Obligation

Virginia Beach, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

Public Finance Authority, Wisconsin Coral Academy Of Science-Las Vegas, Nevada; Charter Schools

Sales Tax Securitization Corporation of Chicago Chicago; Sales Tax

Puerto Rico; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security

Alaska; Appropriations; General Obligation; Moral Obligation

Lancaster County Hospital Authority, Pennsylvania Masonic Villages of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania; Long Term Care

Wicomico County, Maryland; General Obligation

Build NYC Resource Corp. YMCA Of Greater New York; Non-Profit Organizations

City of Winnipeg 'AA' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Florida Turnpike Enterprise; Toll Roads Bridges

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Gainesville, Florida Gainesville Regional Utilities; CP; Combined Utility

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina; CP; Joint Criteria; System

Richmond, Virginia; General Obligation

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

S&P Updates U.S. Local Governments GO Criteria

Maryland; General Obligation

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY Issuer Credit Rating Lowered To 'A+' From 'AA-'

Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority, California Anaheim; Retail Electric; Wholesale Electric

Summary: Rhode Island Turnpike And Bridge Authority; Toll Roads Bridges. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research

Funds Rating Criteria: Market Price Exposure

Lubbock (City of), TX

Transcription:

October 8, 2008 Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada; General Obligation Primary Credit Analyst: Le T Quach, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5013; le_quach@standardandpoors.com Secondary Credit Analyst: Paul Dyson, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5079; paul_dyson@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Wastewater System Local Economy - Growing But At Reduced Levels Financial Management Assessment (FMA): 'Strong' www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 1 Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without S&P's permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page. 675816 301027627

Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada; General Obligation Credit Profile US$250. mil GO Lmt Tax wtr Reclam bnds ser 2008 due 07/01/2038 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable New Clark Cnty Wtr Reclamation Dist GO bnds (ltd tax) ser 2007 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Upgraded Clark Cnty Wtr Reclamation Dist ltd tax go rfdg bnds ser 2003 dtd 04/01/2003 due 07/01/2004-2012 Unenhanced Rating AAA(SPUR)/Stable Upgraded Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its rating and underlying rating (SPUR) to 'AAA' from 'AA+' on Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nev.'s series 2003 and series 2007 limited-tax general obligation (GO) bonds. In addition, Standard & Poor's assigned its 'AAA' rating to the district's series 2008 limited-tax GO bonds. The raised ratings reflect the district's continued strong financial performance and very strong liquidity position. The rating also reflects the district's: Growing service area economy that includes the Las Vegas Strip, with good income levels; Strong projected coverage levels; and Very strong liquidity position, with cash and unrestricted investments equaling about seven years of cash on hand. The bonds are secured by the district's limited tax GO pledge, subject to the limit on overlapping tax rates of $3.64 per $100 of assessed value (AV). The bonds are additionally secured by a pledge of net system revenues, and the district has historically not levied an ad valorem tax because pledged revenues have been sufficient to pay debt service on all the district's bonds and obligations; however, in any year in which those revenues are insufficient to pay debt service, the district is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes to pay debt service. The Clark County Water Reclamation District provides wastewater treatment services to 212,226 predominantly residential customer accounts in unincorporated portions of Clark County, including the Las Vegas Strip, and the communities of Blue Diamond, Indian Springs, Laughlin, Overton, and Searchlight. The system's customer base has exhibited strong growth over the past few years, increasing at an average annual rate of 7.6% since fiscal 2004. There is no customer concentration; the 10 leading customers provide about 11% of operating revenues in fiscal 2008 (unaudited). The district's board comprises members of the Clark County Board of Commissioners and sets sewer rates after a public hearing. The district recently approved annual rate increases of about 6% through 2013. Wastewater rates remain competitive nationally at about $15.83 a month. Customers are billed annually for sewer service with an option to pay annually, semiannually, or quarterly. Delinquent payments serve as a lien on property and are billed Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect October 8, 2008 2

Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada; General Obligation through the property tax collection process. As such, collections have been historically strong and delinquency rates have been low. The capital improvement plan (CIP) for fiscals 2009-2013 is large, totaling $1.3 billion, primarily providing for upgrades to existing infrastructure and growth-related expansions as well as required federal and state improvements. The CIP will be funded primarily through debt issuances. The district plans to issue $398 million in new limited-tax GO debt in 2009, $437 million in 2010, and $120 million in 2011. The district's financial performance has been strong. Annual debt service coverage from pledged revenues has ranged from 6.9x to 36.3x since fiscal 2004. Based on the district's fiscal 2009 budget, annual debt service coverage is projected to be 4.3x. System growth throughout the service area has resulted in strong connection fee revenues averaging $63 million since fiscal 2004, which supported the district's build-up of strong cash reserves. The district's liquidity position is very strong, with 2,440 days' cash in fiscal 2008 (unaudited). Outlook The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the district's strong operating and financial position will continue, coupled with ongoing management of the CIP. Approved multiyear rate increases are expected to offset rising debt service costs associated with planned future debt issuance. Wastewater System The district's sewer service area covers about 100 square miles, including the Las Vegas Strip. In addition to the large hotels/casinos served by the main system, the district also operates sewer service facilities for the towns of Overton, Laughlin, Searchlight, Blue Diamond, and Indian Springs. The customer base is overwhelmingly residential (96% of total accounts), and there is no customer concentration. In fiscal 2008, the 10 leading users accounted for just 11% of operating revenues. The total number of accounts has increased at an annual rate of 8% since fiscal 2004. Given the current housing slowdown evident in Clark County and nationally, the number of new sewer connections has slowed. However, some construction projects are still underway on Clark County's Las Vegas Strip, including expansions of existing casinos and the development of new residential condominiums and retail spaces. The main treatment plant has 106 million gallons per day (mgd) of treatment capacity to meet average daily flows of 97 mgd. Plans are to increase average daily treatment capacity to 160 mgd within the next five years. In addition, an average of 7.5 mgd of effluent water is reclaimed for irrigation and industrial uses. Local Economy - Growing But At Reduced Levels District AV has increased at an average annual rate of 24% since fiscal 2005 to reach $59.8 billion in fiscal 2009. The district represents 53% of Clark County's fiscal 2009 total AV. Including this issuance, overall debt within the district on a per capita basis is moderate at $3,383 but low as a percent of market value at 1.7%. Clark County had a 2007 population of 1.98 million; since 2000, the population has grown 44% from 1.37 million. Of the state's 2.7 million residents, 73% live in Clark County. The Las Vegas-Clark County metropolitan area has long been a draw for new residents and homebuilders, leading to property values that rose dramatically and peaked in late 2006, due partly to speculation and increased access to borrowing in the residential real estate market. This www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 3

Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada; General Obligation has led to a currently stagnant residential real estate market, with rising foreclosures and evidence of falling prices. In recent years, property values reached heights that have proven unsustainable, as median new sales prices have fallen 41% from the peak in August 2006. Some construction activity is continuing on the Las Vegas Strip, which is home to many large casino-hotel complexes. Income indicators for the county are good, with median household effective buying income measuring 109% of the nation in 2007. Financial Management Assessment (FMA): 'Strong' Clark County Water Reclamation District's management practices are considered to be 'strong' under Standard & Poor's Financial Management Assessment (FMA). In our framework, an FMA of 'strong' indicates that practices are strong, well embedded and likely sustainable. The county uses multiple internal and external sources to build its budget and incorporates derived trends into its long-term financial and capital plans, which are updated yearly. Budgets are also reviewed monthly by its board. The county has an adopted debt management policy that prescribes the size of debt burden, debt limits, and circumstances for using debt. In addition, the district maintains several designated, unrestricted reserves including an operating reserve equal to 90 days' of the previous year's operations & maintenance (O&M) expenditures. The district also has a policy to maintain a capital contingency reserve equal to 12 months of total budgeted capital repair and replacement. As of July 1, 2008, the balance of this account was $127 million. The district has a policy to maintain a capital expansion contingency reserve that is set aside in the event of an unanticipated need for capital expansion. The reserve amount is equal to 12 months' budgeted capital expansion projects and as of July 1, 2008, the balance of this account was $138 million. The district also maintains a budget stabilization reserve (equal to 5% of current budgeted O&M expenditures). The district has established an other post-employment fund and in fiscal 2008 began depositing its annual required contribution of $1.4 million into the fund. Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect October 8, 2008 4

Copyright 2008 Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P). S&P and/or its third party licensors have exclusive proprietary rights in the data or information provided herein. This data/information may only be used internally for business purposes and shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. Dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this data/information in any form is strictly prohibited except with the prior written permission of S&P. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by S&P, its affiliates or its third party licensors, S&P, its affiliates and its third party licensors do not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. S&P GIVES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall S&P, its affiliates and its third party licensors be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscriber's or others use of the data/information contained herein. Access to the data or information contained herein is subject to termination in the event any agreement with a thirdparty of information or software is terminated. Analytic services provided by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (Ratings Services) are the result of separate activities designed to preserve the independence and objectivity of ratings opinions. The credit ratings and observations contained herein are solely statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or make any other investment decisions. Accordingly, any user of the information contained herein should not rely on any credit rating or other opinion contained herein in making any investment decision. Ratings are based on information received by Ratings Services. Other divisions of Standard & Poor's may have information that is not available to Ratings Services. Standard & Poor's has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of non-public information received during the ratings process. Ratings Services receives compensation for its ratings. Such compensation is normally paid either by the issuers of such securities or third parties participating in marketing the securities. While Standard & Poor's reserves the right to disseminate the rating, it receives no payment for doing so, except for subscriptions to its publications. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1)212.438.9823 or by e-mail to: research_request@standardandpoors.com. Copyright 1994-2008 Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 5 675816 301027627