LEGAL ASPECTS OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS

Similar documents
COMMISSION DECISION. of

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Information Circular. INFCIRC/830 Date: 30 November 2011

Euratom research and training programme under Horizon-2020

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

BREXIT BRIEFING. Euratom and Brexit. British Medical Association bma.org.uk

Convention on Nuclear Safety 7 th Review Meeting 2017

Council of the European Union Brussels, 31 March 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

Introduction to Nuclear Law

Statement on behalf of the Euratom Community

EU science policy and instruments. Richard Burger Science Counsellor Delegation of the European Commission to Russia 01 October 2009

Nuclear Safeguards in the European Community - A Regional Approach

LEAVING THE EU THE EURATOM TREATY PART 2: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 31 and 32 thereof,

Statement on behalf of the Euratom Community

Division for Europe STRATEGY FOR THE TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME IN THE EUROPE REGION

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS

Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation

Nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre Euratom Research & Training Programme

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 June /14 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0340 (NLE) ATO 45

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 August 2002 (OR. en) 11382/02 Interinstitutional File: 2001/0125 (CNS) LIMITE RECH 136 ATO 103

The European Waste Directive: Gunnar Buckau, JRC-ITU

E&T in Radioactive Waste Disposal

A European Industrial Initiative for Sustainable Fission (SET Plan),

Nuclear safeguards and security activities under Euratom research and training programme

The European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom):

Joint IAEA OECD/NEA International Reporting System for Operating Experience

The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia takes part in some of the work of the OECD (agreement of 28th October 1961).

Construction of a new nuclear capacity at the site of Kozloduy NPP. Licensing and Environmental Impact Assessment

on the Regular Budget appropriations for 1993 at the September 1992 dollar/schilling exchange rate Note by the Secretariat

SET-PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Pickering Whole-Site Risk

Horizon 2020 : The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Fission EU research : activities under Horizon 2020 ( )

Course 2: The EUR Document

Seminar on neutron research centre in the Øresund region (European Spallation Source) 29 November ESS, P&T and EU

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMISSION NUCLEAR SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUB-COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH 4 TH APRIL 2006

EU Council Adopts Revised Nuclear Safety Directive

Multilateral Nuclear Approaches International Uranium Enrichment Center

Guide. Commission Recommendation

Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management. 15 July - 3 August, Financing Structures for a Nuclear Power Plant Project

European Joint Programme in Radioactive Waste Management

THE CEA FINANCIAL REPORT 2014

Statement on behalf of DG Energy

Planning for future: towards rev D

1. Conditions of the simplified public exchange offer and of the beginning of the period of voluntary conversion of Non-Voting Preferred Shares

Fifth REWIEW MEETING Convention on Nuclear Safety

European Joint Research Programme in the management and disposal of radioactive waste

1 st Topical Peer Review Public event 22 nd November 2018 Brussels. P. Tiippana TPR Board Chairman

EU Nuclear Legislation

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation. {SEC(2011) 1472 final} {SEC(2011) 1473 final}

Euratom success stories in facilitating Pan-European E&T Collaborative Efforts

Contents. Introduction P Overview P What is Euratom? P. 03

Nuclear Fission, Safety and Radiation Protection. Deadline: 13 November 2012, at , Brussels local time 1

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Elements of National Law and Decommissioning

12 th GIF-IAEA Interface Meeting Vienna March 2018

Possible Financing Schemes for Current and Near Term Nuclear Power Projects

EUROPEAN UTILITY REQUIREMENTS: ACTIONS IN PROGRESS AND NEXT STEPS

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Towards HORIZON 2020: the EU s research, development and innovation framework

the EUR works in

INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY COOPERATION (IFNEC)

Action Document for Turkey Nuclear Safety Cooperation. Total estimated cost: EUR 3 million Total amount of EU budget contribution EUR 3 million 6.

Regional Cooperation on Spent Fuel management Status and Prospects in Europe, Arab Regions and Asia

Euratom Joint Programme in Radioactive Waste Management - from Reflections (2015) to Requirements (2016)

COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-8

Nuclear Innovation Cooperation In the Low-Carbon Perspective

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2013 (OR. en) 16463/13 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0400 (NLE) RECH 550 COMPET 843 ATO 147

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Petras Auštrevičius (PE v03-00)

The next steps Pierre BERBEY

Nuclear Safeguards Policy Issues

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT

Final PF2 Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes Part II of the Horizontal Programme on Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection

Propects towards a Nuclear Liability Directive

Agreed Framework between the United States of America and the Democratic Republic of Korea (1994)

National Documentation Center (EKT/NHRF) Introduction to FP7

INDIA & FRANCE. 30/11/2012 Bernard Dufresne Economic Counsellor French Consulate General in Mumbai

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Justification, Optimization and Dose Limits: The recent evolutions of National Regulations in European Countries

Official Journal of the European Union L 196/67

Joint ICTP-IAEA School of Nuclear Energy Management August Financing Nuclear Projects. N. Barkatullah IAEA, Vienna Austria

UK New Nuclear: Hinkley Point C Case Study

Nuclear New Build: Risk and Finance

Meeting of the Group of Experts established under Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty. Luxembourg, November 2015 SUMMARY REPORT

EuropeAid. Presentation to Serbia Brussels, July, 2014

AREVA: successfully facing current industry challenges

Official Journal of the European Union L 330/31 COMMISSION

India s Civil Nuclear Liability Law

Reference document 2007

HEHORANDUM. Article I. The Programme covers all recognized branches of fundamental research, including hurnanities, social sciences, economics.

Coherence Report Insights from the External Evaluation of the External Financing Instruments Final Report - Annexes July 2017

Annual Meeting of the National Contact Points for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

NEW AREVA HOLDING. December 31, 2016

Setting JET on Track. Prof. Donato Palumbo Honorary General Director Research EURATOM

SYSTEMIC ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS (IIAs)

C 368/24 Official Journal of the European Union

Transcription:

LEGAL ASPECTS OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS IAEA TM-52851 Anne-Lise Teani 10 FEBRUARY 2016 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 AVRIL 2012 PAGE 1

INTRODUCTION What is a strategic partnership? Not a legal concept no definition in international law Key elements to recognize a strategic partnership : a project a long-term relationship For the purpose of this technical meeting, a strategic partnerships is: Dedicated to the expansion/introduction of NPP ( the Project ) International (at least 2 countries involved): - The presentation will not address purely domestic projects - The presentation will not address multilateral strategic partnerships (ex: ITER) Therefore, this presentation aims at introducing the main legal aspects of an international (mainly bilateral) strategic partnership dedicated to the expansion/introduction of NPP 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 2

WHO ARE THE PARTNERS? Large number of partners involved in that kind of projects from sovereign actors to private entities: States State owned entities Regulators Private companies Suppliers Insurance companies This large number of partners will result in: Multiple agreements between the different actors of the 2 countries involved Several layers of commitments Establishing a hierarchy between the different layers ot commitments is essential IAEA (or Euratom at the European level) might also be a key actor in strategic partnerships even though they cannot be considered as partners. Ex: Agreement dated 1977 between the Agency, France and South Africa for the implementation of safeguards in respect of the Koeberg nuclear powerstation. 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 3

LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS The legal framework of a strategic partnership is complex and implies several layers of commitment: At the top of the framework stand an intergovernmental agreement At the center of the partnership stand the commercial contract Agreements Around these 2 fundamental legal instruments a lot of public entities collaborate to secure/develop and prolong the strategic partnership: - Regulators of both countries might collaborate in the field of nuclear safety, radiation protection and licensing - Waste management agencies might also enter into a partnership to implement at the very early stage of the Projet a waste management strategy - R&D organizations of both countries might develop common new projects and exchange of scientists (ex: secondee agreements) - Schools/Universities of both countries might collaborate in the field of education and training The completness of this framework is a prerequisite for a global and long term partnership 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 4

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS (I) At the top of the hierarchy of a strategic partnership stand the intergovernmental agreement Indeed, the decision to expand or introduce NPP in a country is highly political and rests with the State itself In the same way, for a «vendor», a State which masters the nuclear technology, the decision to design and build a NPP outside of its territory is taken by the public authorities and shall be consistent with international standards and non proliferation rules Therefore, an agreement between the 2 interested States is classic but not absolutely necessary. Example of Public Private Partnership (PPP): for the construction of 2 EPR in Hinkley Point, EDF signed a PPP with the british Governement and there is no dedicated intergovernmental agreement between France and UK The negociation of an intergovernmental agreement can be very long. Most of the time, the intergovernmental agreement is preceded by political declarations, Memorandum of Understanding, letters of intention 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 5

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS (II) There are two main categories of intergovernmental agreements: General agreements: - In France, approximately 25 intergovernmental agreements - Generic title Cooperation in the field of peaceful uses of nuclear energy - Large scope of cooperation (energy production/mining/ waste management/r&d projects/nuclear safety ) - Implementation of the areas of cooperation might be delegated to «competent authorities» (for example: Atomic Energy Commission) - Concluded for long periods of time (classic provision: 20 years with possible or implicit renewal) - The existence of a general agreement will facilitate the negociation of a project related agreement Project related agreements: - The scope of the agreement is limited to the project - The agreement can be connected with a pre-existing general agreement - The negociation might be shorter (especially if you already have a general agreement) - Concluded for a long period of time too (30 years is classic) 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 6

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS - MAIN PROVISIONS TO BE NEGOCIATED If a country is interested in a nuclear cooperation with France, the following provisions will need to be discussed: Protection of information Intellectual property Nuclear safety radiation protection Nuclear third party liability Peaceful use Transfers and retransfers Safeguards Physical protection and nuclear security Settlement of disputes Duration Comment: the negotiation of such provisions is complex and take a lot of time to reduce undue delay in the negociation of the commercial contract, both processes can be launched simultaneously (with 2 teams of negotiators). At the national level, it could be very useful to create a joint committee that will coordinate the 2 negotiations.this coordination will ensure the consistency of the «package». In any event, once the 2 texts are finalized, in France, the intergovernmental agreement shall be signed first. 4 FÉVRIER 2016 CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 7

FOCUS ON LOWER PUBLIC AGREEMENTS Concluded by public entities. They strengthen and complete the intergovernmental and commercial relationship. Most of the time concluded on non-commercial basis Examples: Cooperation in the field of scientific and technological research or Cooperation on education and training in the field of nuclear science and technology Provisions to be negociated : Areas of cooperation (research reactors, waste management, fuel cycle, emergency prepardness ) Forms of cooperation (exchange of general information, exchange of scientific and technical information on specific topics, short visits of scientists, joint R&D projects, exchange or secondment of staff, training of staff) Confidentiality Intellectual property Publications Implementation of research collaboration agreements through secondee agreements (negociated on a personal and case by case basis) CEA 10 FEBRUARY 2016 PAGE 8

PAGE 9 CEA 10 AVRIL 2012 Commissariat à l énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives Centre de Saclay 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex Etablissement public à caractère industriel et commercial RCS Paris B 775 685 019 4 FÉVRIER 2016