DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Hasil Common Effect Model

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

esia/perkembangan/

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Openness and Inflation

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Supplementary Materials for

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

MỘT SỐ KHUYẾT TẬT CỦA MÔ HÌNH HỒI QUY

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

THE DETERMINANT OF INFLATION IN INDONESIA: PARTIAL ADJUSTMENT MODEL APPROACH

Volume-5, Issue-1, June-2018 ISSN No:

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

Nexus between stock exchange index and exchange rates

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Economics and Finance 10 ( 2014 )

X. Einkommensfunktion II

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

Gloria Gonzalez-Rivera Forecasting For Economics and Business Solutions Manual

The Effects of Oil Price Volatility on Some Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria: Application of Garch and Var Models

The Estimation Model for Measuring Performance of Stock Mutual Funds Based on ARCH / GARCH Model

Mathematical Model for Estimating Income Tax Revenues in the Philippines through Regression Analysis Using Matrices

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

FACTORS AFFECTING QUASI MONEY AFTER THE 1998 ECONOMIC CRISIS IN INDONESIA

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur

Efficiency of Operational Activity of Commercial Banks in Romania

Business Survey and Short-Term Projection

Effect of Profitability and Financial Leverage on Capita Structure in Pakistan Textile Firms

9. Assessing the impact of the credit guarantee fund for SMEs in the field of agriculture - The case of Hungary

A Test of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem Using Market Evaluations of Kazakhstani Banks

Time Series Analysis of Inflation and RBI Policy Rates

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

The Credit Cycle and the Business Cycle in the Economy of Turkey

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Trading Volume and Fama-French Three Factor Model on Excess Return. Empirical Evidence from Nairobi Security Exchange

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

Solution to Exercise E5.

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Factors Affecting the Volatility of the Jakarta Composite Index before and after the Merger of Two Stock and Bond Markets in Indonesia

Can the Taylor Rule Describe the Monetary Policy in China?

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

Relationship of Business Risk, Financial and Performance : Evidence From Indonesia

EXTERNAL FACTORS INFLUENCE ON INFLATION: THE CASE OF ROMANIA

Transcription:

Lampiran 1 Tahu n Volume Impor Bawang Merah Konsums i Bawang Merah Perkapit a di Indonesi a DATA PENELITIAN Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia Harga Bawang Merah Impor Nilai Tukar Volume Impor Periode Sebelumnya MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 (ton) (kg) (Rupiah) (Ton) ( US $ / Ton) (Rp / Ton) (Rupiah / US$) 22 32.93,8 2,26 8.546,5 766.572 275,4 2.564.32 9.311,19 47.95,3 23 42.7,9 2,227 9.34,9 762.795 294,5 2.525.965 8.577,13 32.93,8 24 48.93, 2,195 1.447,1 757.399 291, 2.61.25 8.938,85 42.7,9 25 53.78, 2,367 12.435,3 732.61 29, 2.4.62 8.278, 48.93, 26 79.84, 2.86 14.741,63 794.931 384, 3.223.68 8.395, 53.78, 27 17.649, 3,14 17.179,22 82.81 41, 3.371.43 8.223, 79.84, 28 128.15, 2,743 21.13,54 853.615 42, 4.599. 1.95, 17.649, 29 67.33, 2,524 23.647,7 965.164 43, 4.42. 9.4, 128.15, 21 73.27, 2,529 26.786,8 1.48.934 462, 4.253.842 8.991, 67.33, 211 156.381, 2,362 3.424,4 893.124 483, 4.234.944 8.768, 73.27, 212 119.55, 2,764 33.338,9 964.221 445,6 4.1.857 9.23, 156.381, Sumber: Data BPS, Deptan Holtikultura, Dirjen Pangan, dan FAO, diolah (kg) xiii 88

Lampiran 2 Hasil Pengolahan Data pada Eviews 7.2 1. Hasil Regresi Persamaan Permintaan Impor Bawang Merah di Indonesia (MB) Dependent Variable: MB Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:27 C 21518.5 4639.71 4.644998.97 X1 18341.28 9543.636 1.921833.127 X2 4.582521.748284 6.12441.36 X3 -.41492.35567-11.54124.3 X4.47143.7784 6.56523.38 X5-6.43338 4.51643-1.424432.2274 X6 -.258145.13351-2.497749.669 R-squared.991326 Mean dependent var 8263.61 Adjusted R-squared.978314 S.D. dependent var 39929.17 S.E. of regression 5879.981 Akaike info criterion 2.45762 Sum squared resid 1.38E+8 Schwarz criterion 2.7183 Log likelihood -15.5169 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.2981 F-statistic 76.18926 Durbin-Watson stat 1.998142 Prob(F-statistic).446 2. Hasil Uji Normalitas 5 4 3 2 1 Series: Residuals Sample 22 212 Observations 11 Mean -2.24e-11 Median 965.8425 Maximum 4259.398 Minimum -8984.213 Std. Dev. 3718.827 Skewness -1.285246 Kurtosis 4.12527 Jarque-Bera 3.585539 Probability.166498-1 -75-5 -25 25 5 xiv 89

Hasil Regresi - Uji Multikolinieritas Dependent Variable: X1 Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:33 C 3.244322 1.613712 2.1471.16 X2-2.19E-5 3.37E-5 -.651816.5433 X3-5.11E-7 1.65E-6 -.39679.7693 X4 3.3E-7 3.33E-7.99923.3672 X5 -.171.197 -.864426.4269 X6 6.5E-6 4.2E-6 1.57528.192 R-squared.545538 Mean dependent var 2.45691 Adjusted R-squared.9175 S.D. dependent var.2891 S.E. of regression.275535 Akaike info criterion.562249 Sum squared resid.379598 Schwarz criterion.779283 Log likelihood 2.9763 Hannan-Quinn criter..42544 F-statistic 1.242 Durbin-Watson stat 3.137994 Prob(F-statistic).42313 Dependent Variable: X2 Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:33 C 1934.38 26335.54.722764.522 X1-3569.26 5475.869 -.651816.5433 X3.164.21.8161.4592 X4.7682.3137 2.44925.58 X5-4.166344 1.953-2.13335.86 X6.8197.5289 1.594736.1717 R-squared.91912 Mean dependent var 18896.81 Adjusted R-squared.83825 S.D. dependent var 8736.588 S.E. of regression 3514.185 Akaike info criterion 19.46945 Sum squared resid 61747474 Schwarz criterion 19.68649 Log likelihood -11.82 Hannan-Quinn criter. 19.33265 F-statistic 11.36131 Durbin-Watson stat 1.417279 Prob(F-statistic).9249 xv 9

Dependent Variable: X3 Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:34 C 686487.3 494774.9 1.387474.224 X1-3689.81 118864.3 -.39679.7693 X2 7.99684 8.856776.8161.4592 X4.44152.95859.46594.6644 X5-4.2852 56.75564 -.75412.9428 X6.7631 1.2996.58527.9556 R-squared.751384 Mean dependent var 849288.6 Adjusted R-squared.52769 S.D. dependent var 14847.9 S.E. of regression 73933.13 Akaike info criterion 25.56216 Sum squared resid 2.73E+1 Schwarz criterion 25.7792 Log likelihood -134.5919 Hannan-Quinn criter. 25.42535 F-statistic 3.22273 Durbin-Watson stat 2.111223 Prob(F-statistic).12563 Dependent Variable: X4 Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:35 C -3541229. 213829. -1.65635.1586 X1 496751.2 5131.7.99923.3672 X2 7.99572 28.98672 2.44925.58 X3.921865 2.1472.46594.6644 X5 444.5721 166.7453 2.666175.446 X6-4.833379 5.53535 -.873944.4221 R-squared.91513 Mean dependent var 3437986. Adjusted R-squared.8326 S.D. dependent var 819851.8 S.E. of regression 337828.9 Akaike info criterion 28.692 Sum squared resid 5.71E+11 Schwarz criterion 28.81795 Log likelihood -151.351 Hannan-Quinn criter. 28.46411 F-statistic 1.77896 Durbin-Watson stat 1.596743 Prob(F-statistic).1388 xvi 91

Dependent Variable: X5 Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:35 C 7763.22 2995.679 2.591467.488 X1-761.9377 881.4381 -.864426.4269 X2 -.114367.5361-2.13335.86 X3 -.265.352 -.75412.9428 X4.1321.495 2.666175.446 X6.12585.8547 1.472476.29 R-squared.79162 Mean dependent var 93.197 Adjusted R-squared.418323 S.D. dependent var 763.493 S.E. of regression 582.2349 Akaike info criterion 15.8748 Sum squared resid 1694988. Schwarz criterion 16.9111 Log likelihood -81.3742 Hannan-Quinn criter. 15.73727 F-statistic 2.438336 Durbin-Watson stat 2.53634 Prob(F-statistic).175152 Dependent Variable: X6 Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:35 C -259871.1 163244.7-1.591912.1723 X1 5162.2 34241.51 1.57528.192 X2 4.242 2.636174 1.594736.1717 X3.95.153852.58527.9556 X4 -.27416.31371 -.873944.4221 X5 24.3374 16.32199 1.472476.29 R-squared.78873 Mean dependent var 76125.64 Adjusted R-squared.577461 S.D. dependent var 39141.95 S.E. of regression 25443.45 Akaike info criterion 23.42876 Sum squared resid 3.24E+9 Schwarz criterion 23.64579 Log likelihood -122.8582 Hannan-Quinn criter. 23.29195 F-statistic 3.733288 Durbin-Watson stat 2.55652 Prob(F-statistic).87293 xvii 92

3. Hasi Regresi Uji Heterokedastisitas Heteroskedasticity Test: Glejser F-statistic.61521 Prob. F(6,4).717 Obs*R-squared 5.279181 Prob. Chi-Square(6).585 Scaled explained SS 2.11265 Prob. Chi-Square(6).912 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: ARESID Date: 3/27/14 Time: 1:43 C -361.6273 2162.45 -.17169.9871 X1 2478.316 434.61.5796.5986 X2.2723.34332.6895.5755 X3 -.3716.16177 -.229734.8296 X4 -.4485.354-1.266747.274 X5 1.17653 2.54138.572529.5976 X6.1441.476.36356.7746 R-squared.479926 Mean dependent var 2751.684 Adjusted R-squared -.3186 S.D. dependent var 2345.363 S.E. of regression 2674.317 Akaike info criterion 18.8819 Sum squared resid 2867882 Schwarz criterion 19.13511 Log likelihood -96.8546 Hannan-Quinn criter. 18.72229 F-statistic.61521 Durbin-Watson stat 2.69346 Prob(F-statistic).716991 xviii 93