Supplementary Materials for

Similar documents
Hasil Common Effect Model

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

Openness and Inflation

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

Quantitative evidence of post-crisis structural macroeconomic changes

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

1.4 Show the steps necessary to obtain relative PPP in growth rates.

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

Volume-5, Issue-1, June-2018 ISSN No:

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

The Frequency of Wars*

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

Return on Assets and Financial Soundness Analysis: Case Study of Grain Industry Companies in Uzbekistan

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

esia/perkembangan/

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

Debt and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Jordan as a Case Study

THE IMPACT OF BANKING RISKS ON THE CAPITAL OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN LIBYA

FTSE BIRR. ftserussell.com. FTSE Russell 1

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

Exchange Rate and Economic Performance - A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

Economic and social factors influence on unemployment in Romania at the local level

Solution to Exercise E5.

Back from the Dead: the GFC and the Resurrection of Long Term Unemployment

Business Survey and Short-Term Projection

9. Assessing the impact of the credit guarantee fund for SMEs in the field of agriculture - The case of Hungary

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

An Examination of Seasonality in Indian Stock Markets With Reference to NSE

THE IMPACT OF INSURANCE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

Model : ASI = C + MONSUP + MONSUP(-1) + INTRATE + INFLRATE. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

The Causality between Revenues and Expenditure of the Federal and Provincial Governments of Pakistan

THE CAUSALITY BETWEEN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURE OF THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS OF PAKISTAN

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

An Empirical Analysis Of The Impact Of Aid On Povertyinselected Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) Countries:

X. Einkommensfunktion II

The Study on Tax Incentive Policies of China's Photovoltaic Industry Jian Xu 1,a, Zhenji Jin 2,b,*

GLOBALISATION, TRADE OPENNESS AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN ROMANIA

Received: 4 September Revised: 9 September Accepted: 19 September. Foreign Institutional Investment on Indian Capital Market: An Empirical Analysis

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

The Impact of Credit Risk Management in the Profitability of Albanian Commercial Banks During the Period

Economy May Wake Up Without Consumers Prodding? Chart 1

An Empirical Research on the Relationship Between Non-Interest Income Business and Operation Performance of Commercial Banks

THE IMPACT OF OIL REVENUES ON BUDGET DEFICIT IN SELECTED OIL COUNTRIES

TRADING VOLUME REACTIONS AND THE ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD (IAS 1): PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN INDONESIA

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

The Impacts of Financial Crisis on Pakistan Economy: An Empirical Approach

ijcrb.webs.com INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AUGUST 2012 VOL 4, NO 4

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(6): Research Article

TURKISH STOCK MARKET DEPENDENCY TO INTERNATIONAL MARKETS AND EXCHANGE RATE

Transcription:

www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6186/851/suppl/dc1 Supplementary Materials for Income Inequality in the Developing World Martin Ravallion This PDF file includes: Fig. S1 Tables S1 to S4 E-mail: mr1185@georgetown.edu Published 23 May 2014, Science 344, 851 (2014) DOI: 10.1126/science.1251875

Table S1: Inequality measures (MLD) between and within countries by region and year Region 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2010 Total inequality East Asia and Pacific 0.283 0.234 0.229 0.272 0.313 0.296 0.322 0.349 0.328 0.366 0.362 Eastern Europe and Central Asia 0.283 0.274 0.283 0.409 0.340 0.358 0.305 0.281 0.279 0.291 0.285 Latin America and the Caribbean 0.636 0.652 0.655 0.657 0.695 0.715 0.713 0.725 0.648 0.609 0.613 Middle East and North Africa 0.358 0.379 0.311 0.290 0.292 0.298 0.311 0.333 0.261 0.266 0.265 South Asia 0.164 0.173 0.175 0.165 0.166 0.186 0.194 0.191 0.193 0.195 0.198 Sub-Saharan Africa 0.503 0.533 0.552 0.552 0.521 0.471 0.475 0.509 0.502 0.531 0.541 Total 0.651 0.591 0.569 0.576 0.585 0.540 0.518 0.528 0.520 0.567 0.578 Inequality between-countries East Asia and Pacific 0.158 0.100 0.079 0.093 0.113 0.092 0.104 0.108 0.089 0.110 0.108 Eastern Europe and Central Asia 0.155 0.144 0.152 0.151 0.067 0.095 0.089 0.077 0.062 0.066 0.074 Latin America and the Caribbean 0.096 0.101 0.090 0.058 0.037 0.051 0.043 0.042 0.045 0.048 0.061 Middle East and North Africa 0.101 0.122 0.063 0.054 0.060 0.071 0.081 0.104 0.042 0.052 0.043 South Asia 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.012 0.009 0.011 0.014 0.016 Sub-Saharan Africa 0.165 0.186 0.176 0.177 0.166 0.140 0.149 0.164 0.141 0.184 0.185 Total 0.446 0.378 0.344 0.329 0.325 0.276 0.252 0.250 0.249 0.296 0.304 Inequality within-countries East Asia and Pacific 0.125 0.133 0.150 0.179 0.201 0.204 0.218 0.241 0.238 0.256 0.254 Eastern Europe and Central Asia 0.128 0.130 0.131 0.258 0.272 0.263 0.216 0.204 0.217 0.225 0.211 Latin America and the Caribbean 0.541 0.551 0.565 0.600 0.658 0.664 0.670 0.683 0.603 0.561 0.552 Middle East and North Africa 0.256 0.257 0.249 0.236 0.232 0.227 0.229 0.230 0.219 0.215 0.223 South Asia 0.156 0.165 0.168 0.155 0.157 0.178 0.182 0.182 0.182 0.181 0.182 Sub-Saharan Africa 0.338 0.347 0.376 0.375 0.355 0.331 0.326 0.345 0.361 0.347 0.356 Total 0.205 0.213 0.226 0.247 0.260 0.264 0.266 0.277 0.271 0.271 0.274

Table S2: Testing for higher inequality in LAC controlling for income surveys Regressing MLD across countries on dummy variable for LAC plus dummy variable for income surveys (INC=1) (a) Earliest survey Dependent Variable: MLD1 Date: 04/02/14 Time: 09:21 Included observations: 100 C 0.290998 0.019313 15.06750 0.0000 LAC 0.230060 0.060440 3.806443 0.0002 INC -0.070182 0.060607-1.157992 0.2497 R-squared 0.177526 Mean dependent var 0.318451 Adjusted R-squared 0.160568 S.D. dependent var 0.195296 S.E. of regression 0.178931 Akaike info criterion -0.574087 Sum squared resid 3.105596 Schwarz criterion -0.495932 Log likelihood 31.70437 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.542457 F-statistic 10.46845 Durbin-Watson stat 2.117709 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000076 (b) Latest survey Dependent Variable: MLD2 Date: 04/02/14 Time: 09:25 Included observations: 103 C 0.270733 0.017573 15.40578 0.0000 REG3 0.203482 0.047438 4.289454 0.0000 INC 0.004898 0.041660 0.117565 0.9066 R-squared 0.256788 Mean dependent var 0.317787 Adjusted R-squared 0.241923 S.D. dependent var 0.170671 S.E. of regression 0.148599 Akaike info criterion -0.946437 Sum squared resid 2.208167 Schwarz criterion -0.869697 Log likelihood 51.74148 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.915354 F-statistic 17.27553 Durbin-Watson stat 2.216325 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Table S3: Regressions for change in inequality at country level MLDt=MLD for t=1,2 (earliest and latest survey date) GINIt=Gini index for t=1,2 GM=annualized difference in log means between t=1 and t=2 GMSQ=annualized difference in squared log means GPCE=annualized difference in log PCE between t=1 and t=2 GPCESQ=annualized difference in squared log PCE PCE=private consumption expenditure per capita from national accounts Mean and PCE are all real, 2005 prices. (a) Using growth rates based on survey means Dependent Variable: (MLD2-MLD1)/TAU Date: 02/08/14 Time: 16:50 Included observations: 99 C 0.000645 0.001495 0.431770 0.6669 GM -0.198293 0.146572-1.352875 0.1793 GMSQ 0.013622 0.014846 0.917559 0.3611 R-squared 0.060825 Mean dependent var -0.000155 Adjusted R-squared 0.041259 S.D. dependent var 0.014260 S.E. of regression 0.013962 Akaike info criterion -5.675061 Sum squared resid 0.018715 Schwarz criterion -5.596421 Log likelihood 283.9155 Hannan-Quinn criter. -5.643243 F-statistic 3.108668 Durbin-Watson stat 1.712074 Prob(F-statistic) 0.049186 Dependent Variable: (GINI2-GINI1)/TAU Date: 02/08/14 Time: 16:52 Included observations: 100 C 0.114978 0.088192 1.303727 0.1954 GM -6.714924 12.06684-0.556478 0.5792 GMSQ 0.081011 1.228045 0.065967 0.9475 R-squared 0.130763 Mean dependent var 0.067650 Adjusted R-squared 0.112841 S.D. dependent var 0.893229 S.E. of regression 0.841325 Akaike info criterion 2.521863 Sum squared resid 68.65923 Schwarz criterion 2.600018 Log likelihood -123.0931 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.553493 F-statistic 7.296076 Durbin-Watson stat 1.418286 Prob(F-statistic) 0.001117

(b) Using growth rates based on national accounts consumption per person Dependent Variable: (MLD2-MLD1)/TAU Date: 02/08/14 Time: 16:54 Included observations: 90 C 0.001795 0.001773 1.012295 0.3142 GPCE -0.617108 0.329791-1.871207 0.0647 GPCESQ 0.053270 0.032318 1.648336 0.1029 R-squared 0.101568 Mean dependent var -0.000174 Adjusted R-squared 0.080914 S.D. dependent var 0.013741 S.E. of regression 0.013173 Akaike info criterion -5.788548 Sum squared resid 0.015097 Schwarz criterion -5.705221 Log likelihood 263.4847 Hannan-Quinn criter. -5.754946 F-statistic 4.917682 Durbin-Watson stat 1.835567 Prob(F-statistic) 0.009476 Dependent Variable: (GINI2-GINI1)/TAU Date: 02/08/14 Time: 16:52 Included observations: 91 C 0.219759 0.118320 1.857337 0.0666 GPCE -32.03168 17.51453-1.828863 0.0708 GPCESQ 2.471500 1.687768 1.464360 0.1467 R-squared 0.104213 Mean dependent var 0.059895 Adjusted R-squared 0.083854 S.D. dependent var 0.804731 S.E. of regression 0.770252 Akaike info criterion 2.348213 Sum squared resid 52.20936 Schwarz criterion 2.430989 Log likelihood -103.8437 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.381608 F-statistic 5.118810 Durbin-Watson stat 1.661664 Prob(F-statistic) 0.007889

Table S4: Testing for the impact of growth on inequality using an Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimator IV regression of the growth rate in the headcount index for $2 a day (GH2) on growth rate in survey mean (GM) using growth rate of private consumption (GPCE) from national accounts as the IV (following Ravallion, 2001, as suggested by a reviewer for Science). This assumes that errors in national accounts consumption are uncorrelated with those in survey means. Dependent Variable: GH2 Method: Two-Stage Least Squares Date: 03/22/14 Time: 16:35 Included observations: 90 Instrument specification: GPCE Constant added to instrument list C 0.050130 0.013303 3.768366 0.0003 GM -3.628489 0.479484-7.567487 0.0000 R-squared 0.718094 Mean dependent var 0.027030 Adjusted R-squared 0.714890 S.D. dependent var 0.213856 S.E. of regression 0.114190 Sum squared resid 1.147455 F-statistic 123.3449 Durbin-Watson stat 1.973433 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Second-Stage SSR 2.462019 J-statistic 0.000000 Instrument rank 2 Same regression but this time using $1.25 a day Dependent Variable: GH1 Method: Two-Stage Least Squares Date: 03/22/14 Time: 16:42 Included observations: 83 Instrument specification: GPCE Constant added to instrument list C 0.028159 0.012488 2.254936 0.0268 GM -2.898388 0.561441-5.162405 0.0000 R-squared 0.729232 Mean dependent var 0.010496 Adjusted R-squared 0.725889 S.D. dependent var 0.198597 S.E. of regression 0.103977 Sum squared resid 0.875702 F-statistic 92.60993 Durbin-Watson stat 1.582109 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Second-Stage SSR 2.232920 J-statistic 0.000000 Instrument rank 2

Fig. S1: Rates of poverty reduction plotted against growth rates of mean household income.6 Annualized log difference in the poverty rate.5.4.3.2.1.0 -.1 $2 per day $1.25 per day -.2 -.3-14 -12-10 -8-6 -4-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Growth rate in household income per capita (% per annuum)