FOLLOWING UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CLAIMANTS THROUGH CONNECTICUT S THE RECESSION OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES. Manisha Srivastava Economist, DOL OCTOBER

Similar documents
Nonfarm jobs grow by 1,500 in October; unemployment rate unchanged at 4.2%

Nonfarm jobs increase by 6,100 in June; unemployment rate at 4.4%

Nonfarm jobs fall by 500 in September; unemployment rate falls to 4.2%

Nonfarm jobs fall by 400 in February; unemployment rate unchanged at 3.8%

Nonfarm jobs decline 2,000 in September; unemployment rate falls to 4.6%

Nonfarm jobs fall by 2,000 in March; unemployment rate at 4.5%

Nonfarm jobs down 1,600 in February; unemployment rate at 4.7%

Nonfarm jobs climb 6,700 in May; unemployment rate steady at 4.9%

Nonfarm jobs slip 1,700 in December; unemployment rate declines to 4.4%

May brings largest nonfarm job gain in 2014 (+5,800); unemployment rate unchanged

LABOR SITUATION Office of Research

Unemployed By Manisha Srivastava, CCT Economist, DOL,

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. Job Polarization in Connecticut DECEMBER December In October... IN THIS ISSUE...

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT

State of Ohio Workforce. 2 nd Quarter

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. Long Term Industry and Occupational Projections: By Matthew Krzyzek and Patrick J.

3/25/2008 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS IN ILLINOIS. Nonfarm Employment Change in Nonfarm Employment by Decade

If the Economy s so Bad, Why Is the Unemployment Rate so Low?

James K. Polk United States President ( ) Mecklenburg County NC

The State of Working Florida 2011

By Sarah Pilipaitis, CT DOL Economist

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS HAWAII'S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AT NEW RECORD 2.0 PERCENT IN NOVEMBER

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. HAWAII'S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AT 2.2 PERCENT IN SEPTEMBER Jobs Increase 11,600 Over the Year

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. The Monthly Snapshot Is Not the Whole Picture By Patrick J. Flaherty, Economist,

Delaware Annual Economic Report 2008

Annual Evaluation of the Hawaii Unemployment Compensation Fund

LABOR SITUATION Office of Research

Nevada Adds 2,800 Jobs in September to 1,394,100 While Unemployment Remains Unchanged at 4.5%

By Jungmin Charles Joo, DOL

Isle Of Wight half year business confidence report

White Pine County. Economic and Demographic Profile, 1999

A LOOK AT CONNECTICUT S OLDER WORKERS

Key Labor Market and Economic Metrics

2010 Economic Forecast: U.S. and State Conditions

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. Covered Employment and AUGUST August In June... IN THIS ISSUE...

THDA STIMULUS SECOND MORTGAGE PROGRAM REPORT

Department of Labor s Office of Research.

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT Housing Market in Review By Kolie Sun, Senior Research Analyst, DECD JULY 2018 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST 1

Nonfarm Employment After our annual revision, Connecticut gained (based on annual average, not seasonally

Self-Employment Assistance Program Net Impact Study

BLS Data: Wisconsin Adds Statistically Significant 35,900 Private-Sector, 22,800 Manufacturing Jobs Over Year

Annual Evaluation of the Hawaii Unemployment Compensation Fund

Horry County. S.C. Department of Employment & Workforce. Business Intelligence Department

Monthly Labour Force Survey Statistics December 2018

Monthly Labour Force Survey Statistics November 2018

Marion County. S.C. Department of Employment & Workforce. Business Intelligence Department

By Alissa K. DeJonge, Vice President of Research, Connecticut Economic Resource Center, Inc.

Michigan s January Unemployment Rate Moves Up Seasonally

THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC

NATIONAL SUMMARY OF FIRST-TIME CLAIMANTS FOR UI

Employment Data (establishment)

nc today october 2006 Photo courtesy of NC Division of Tourism, Film and Sports development. Linn Cove Viaduct, Blue Ridge Parkway, NC

Understanding Child Poverty in the Midst of Great Wealth


ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. Are Gig Jobs Transforming the Labor Markets? By Patrick J. Flaherty, Assistant Director of Research, DOL

Current Employment Statistics

BTP Stop and Search Data - August 2012

Current Employment Statistics

Employment Law Project. The Crisis of Long Term Unemployment and the Need for Bold Action to Sustain the Unemployed and Support the Recovery 1

We are in the midst of a weak and fragile recovery, with unemployment grinding

Economic Indicator Movement Status (Favorable/Unfavorable)

Nonfarm jobs grow by 6,000 in December; unemployment rate unchanged at 4.6%

September jobs decline by 7,600; state s unemployment rate continues to fall

5.7% 5,895,200 13,778

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT Economic Outlook: Steady Growth Globally, Slower Growth Yet Positive Potential for Connecticut JANUARY 2019

Minnesota Energy Industry

NEVADA SUB-STATE LABOR MARKET OVERVIEW. October 2018

State nonfarm jobs rebound to recovery high; unemployment rate falls to recovery low

NEW ORLEANS REGIONAL COUNCIL FOR BUSINESS ECONOMICS

Crisis of Long-Term Unemployment is Far From Over Now Reaching Most Segments of the Labor Market By

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. State Economic Indexes (SEI), By Jungmin Charles Joo and Dana Placzek, DOL OCTOBER 2017

Issue Brief. Workers Displaced From Employment, : Implications for Employee Benefits and Income Security

Nevada s Unemployment Rate Drops Again in February

ECONOMIC DIGEST THE CONNECTICUT. State Housing Market Continued its Recovery in 2013 By Kolie Sun, Senior Research Analyst, DECD JULY 2014

Table 1: Major Indicators of Labor Market Activity for New Jersey Seasonally Adjusted 2016 Benchmark Labor Force Data (resident)

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: August 2017 HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY. Piraeus, 9 November 2017

Rifle city Demographic and Economic Profile

Issue Brief. Salary Reduction Plans and Individual Saving for Retirement EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE

The Impact of the Recession on Employment-Based Health Coverage

Issue Brief. Characteristics of the Nonelderly with Selected Sources of Health Insurance and Lengths of Uninsured Spells

Nevada s Metro Areas Experience Drop in Unemployment in December

The Health of Jefferson County: 2010 Demographic Update

Industry Overview. Austin Community College. Emsi Q Data Set. June Emsi Q Data Set

Vol.24 No.4 A joint publication of the Connecticut Department of Labor & the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development

FOR THE STUDY OF RACE AND ETHNICITY

Evaluation of Latvia s Public Works Program (WWS)

What Does the Unemployment Rate Indicate About the Weak Labor Market?

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: October 2018 HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY. Piraeus, 10 January 2019

Permian Basin Workforce Development Area* February 2016

Research & Policy Brief Number 4 December 2009

North Carolina s June Employment Figures Released

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: November 2016 HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY. Piraeus, February 9, 2017

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: January 2018 HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY. Piraeus, 12 April 2018

AIDS Drug Assistance Program. Improving Health... Promoting Wellness

Metropolitan Statistical Area

The Interaction of Workforce Development Programs and Unemployment Compensation by Individuals with Disabilities in Washington State

Economic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018

Today's jobs data: what you need to know

Transcription:

FOLLOWING CONNECTICUT S UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CLAIMANTS THROUGH THE RECESSION OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES PREPARED BY Manisha Srivastava Economist, DOL Connecticut Department of Labor 200 Folly Brook Blvd. Wethersfield, CT 06109 DIRECTOR Andrew Condon, Ph.D. COMMISSIONER Glenn Marshall OCTOBER CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR LABOR MARKET INFORMATION WWW1.CTDOL.STATE.CT.US/LMI

The recession of the late 2000 s is the worst to hit the United States since the depression of the 1930 s. Nineteen months after the official completion of Connecticut s recession, the unemployment rate is still stubbornly stuck around 9%. Based on data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), it is estimated about 119,000 jobs were lost in Connecticut through December 2009. Connecticut gained 24,300 jobs from January 2010, the end of Connecticut s recession, to January. However, from January to July, only about 8,500 have been created. At the current level of job growth, it will take many years to employ those laid off by the recession. Who are these workers affected by the recession? How many of them exhausted all unemployment insurance (UI) benefits available to them? How many of these exhaustees are now employed? What industries did they previously work in, and what industries are they now employed in? How old are they, and where do they live? These are just some of the questions we are going to explore using UI claimant history data, which is a record of the UI claims filed each week. It is important to note the following data does not speak for all of Connecticut s unemployed, rather just those who were eligible to receive UI benefits. Connecticut s UI Claimants Graph 1 shows the number of claimants by week from the start of the U.S. recession in December 2007 to August. Connecticut was averaging about 35,000 to 50,000 claims a week just prior to the recession. At the peak, from January 2010 to May 2010, there were just under 180,000 claims per week. According to the latest data available, 125,437 claims were filed on August 27,. On that date, 61,090 claimants filed under the regular UI program (the initial 6 months of unemployment), and another 64,347 claimants filed under the federally funded UI extension programs (Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) and Extended Benefits (EB)). The EB program is scheduled to cease on December 17, with final payments made the last week of December. The EUC program will end on June 9, 2012. However, claimants will only be able to complete the tier of EUC they are on as of the first week of January 2012. 1

200,000 180,000 160,000 Graph 1: Total Weekly UI Claims in Connecticut EUC/EB Claimants Regular Claimaints 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Dec-07 Mar-08 Jun-08 Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Sep-09 Dec-09 Mar-10 Jun-10 Sep-10 Dec-10 Mar-11 Jun-11 Note: not shown in Graph 1 are Trade Readjustment Allowance (TRA) claimants, who generally make up anywhere from 0 to 400 claimants per week. Graph 2 shows the number of exhaustees from Connecticut s UI program by week. Exhaustees are UI claimants that exhausted all possible benefits available to them (99 weeks at the maximum). As of August 27,, there are 55,501 exhaustees of Connecticut s UI program. After receiving almost two years of UI benefits, the first exhaustees appeared on May 15, 2010. Since then, Connecticut has averaged about 650 exhaustees per week. The spike in the number of exhaustees in the winter of 2010/ corresponds to the deep job losses two years back in the winter of 2008/2009. On a positive note, the number of weekly exhaustees has been trending downwards. 2

1400 Graph 2: Weekly Exhaustees of Connecticut's UI Program 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Note: Not shown in Graph 2 are the approximate 11,500 individuals who exhausted UI benefits on May 15, 2010. This large initial group of exhaustees is due to a reach-back at the start of the federal extensions to find unemployed UI claimants that had recently exhausted all regular UI benefits available to them. Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Reemployed Exhaustees Using Connecticut s UI wage records to analyze reemployment finds that only 24.7% of individuals who exhausted benefits by the end of March were reemployed in the second quarter of. Table 1 below further breaks down exhaustee reemployment by quarter of exhausting UI benefits and quarter of reemployment. Note the trend indicated by the colored cells, which show percent of reemployment based on number of quarters since exhausting benefits. The initial set of exhaustees from the second quarter of 2010 fared poorly in reemployment compared to the rest of the exhaustees. For the rest of the exhaustees, about 26-27% were reemployed the second quarter out after exhausting benefits. Connecticut's wage records collected for administering the UI program were used to determine exhaustee reemployment. It is important to note that due to limitations in the data, the resulting reemployment numbers are lower than they may be in actuality for Connecticut s exhaustees. For instance, some number of exhaustees may have chosen to retire, and therefore are not actively seeking reemployment. Alternatively, some exhaustees may have found employment outside of Connecticut. Finally, the wage records do not contain data on certain types of employment, including self-employment, unpaid family workers, and some religious organizations to name a few. For these reasons, the reemployment figures presented below may understate the actual reemployment level of Connecticut s exhaustees. 3

Quarter Exhausted Benefits Table 1: Number of Reemployed Exhaustees by Quarter of Exhaustion and Quarter of Reemployment Number of exhaustees Percent of exhaustees employed by Quarter employed by Quarter Total Number of Exhaustees by Quarter 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 Q1 Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 Q1 Q2 2010 Q2 15,314 2,151 2,932 2,900 3,227 14.0% 19.1% 18.9% 21.1% 2010 Q3 7,419 1,798 1,920 2,077 24.2% 25.9% 28.0% 2010 Q4 10,047 2,068 2,705 20.6% 26.9% Q1 10,392 2,647 25.5% Total 43,172 2,151 4,730 6,888 10,656 14.0% 20.8% 21.0% 24.7% Note: Each quarter s reemployment number is a snapshot for the quarter and does not indicate individuals sustained employment quarter to quarter. In an effort to isolate exhaustees that may have retired or found work out of state, Table 1 was reproduced for a subset of exhaustees. Table 2 below shows reemployment for exhaustees that reside in Connecticut and are 64 years or younger. By excluding said individuals, exhaustee reemployment reaches 30.3% in the second quarter of. At the maximum, 2010 quarter three exhaustees reached a 34.1% reemployment level three quarters out after exhausting benefits. Quarter Exhausted Benefits Table 2: Number of Reemployed Exhaustees (Residing in Connecticut and 64 years or younger) by Quarter of Exhaustion and Quarter of Employment Total Number of Exhaustees by Quarter 2010 Q3 Number of exhaustees employed by Quarter 2010 Q4 Q1 Q2 2010 Q3 Percent of exhaustees employed by Quarter 2010 Q4 Q1 Q2 2010 Q2 11,355 2,044 2,739 2,726 3,022 18.0% 24.1% 24.0% 26.6% 2010 Q3 5,731 1,693 1,818 1,957 29.5% 31.7% 34.1% 2010 Q4 7,856 1,951 2,525 24.8% 32.1% Q1 8,056 2,503 31.1% Total 32,998 2,044 4,432 6,495 10,007 18.0% 25.9% 26.0% 30.3% Comparison of Pre- Post- Unemployment Earnings A comparison of post-unemployment earnings as a percent of pre-unemployment earnings finds that 65% of reemployed exhaustees are making 75% or less of what they previously earned. Another 10% of reemployed exhaustees are earning between 75% to 90% of their prior earnings, and about 25% are making 90% or more of their prior wage. 4

One possible explanation for the large amount of low post-unemployment earnings is that the post-unemployment wage may be for part-time work whereas the pre-unemployment earning may be based on full-time work. UI wage records do not contain indicators for part-time versus full-time work. Thus, the findings in Graph 3 may be a result of comparing part-time to full-time earnings for some individuals. Regardless, the fact remains that large numbers of exhaustees that did find employment are making just a fraction of what they previously earned. Graph 3: Post-Unemployment Earnings as a Percent of Pre-Unemployment Earnings 8% 4% 19% 9% 10% 4% 22% Less than 25% Between 25% to 50% Between 50% to 75% Between 75% to 90% Between 90% to 110% Between 110% to 125% Between 125% to 200% Above 200% 24% Note: Data based on the 2,211 exhaustees that met the criteria for inclusion. For inclusion, exhaustees needed to have wage records for three subsequent quarters after exhausting benefits. E.g., 2010 Q2 exhaustees that had wage records in 2010 Q3, 2010 Q4, and Q1, and 2010 Q3 exhaustees that had wage records in 2010 Q4, Q1, and Q2. Further, for inclusion exhaustees had to have wage records for three quarters prior to receiving UI benefits. The post-unemployment earnings as a percent of pre-unemployment earnings was calculated based on the earnings of the middle quarter of the pre-unemployment and post-unemployment wage records. The middle of three quarters was used to eliminate individuals that only worked for part of a quarter. Looking only at the post-unemployment earnings of the 2,211 exhaustees analyzed in Graph 3 finds that 89% are earning $40,000 or less a year. Another 8% are earning between $40,000 to $60,000 a year. As previously mentioned, these earnings may be for part-time work rather than full-time work. The frequency distribution for reemployed exhaustees postunemployment wages is displayed in Graph 4. 5

Graph 4: Post-Unemployment Earnings for Reemployed Exhaustees Number of Workers 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Yearly Wage in Thousands 100 1 100% 80% 60% 40% 0% Cumulative Percent Note: The yearly wage was calculated by quadrupling the quarterly wage. Comparison of Pre- to Post- Unemployment Industries for Reemployed Exhaustees This section continues analysis on reemployed exhaustees by comparing pre- to postunemployment industries; later on in the report, the prior industry for all UI Claimants is presented. A comparison of the pre-unemployment industry to post-unemployment industry of reemployed exhaustees finds at the maximum (in Health Care and Social Assistance) only 50% of exhaustees remained in the same industry. Construction retained about 38% of exhaustees, whereas Manufacturing only retained about of exhaustees. Graph 5 below shows the percent of exhaustees working in the same industry post-unemployment, and Graph 6 shows a detailed breakdown for select industries. 6

Graph 5: Percent of Exhaustees Working in the Same Industry Post-Unemployment Construction 38% Manufacturing Wholesale Trade 14% Retail Trade 42% Transportation & Utilities 22% Information 4% Finance & Insurance 25% Real Estate and Rental & Leasing 15% Prof., Sci., & Tech. Services Mgmt of Companies & Enterprises 7% Admin & Support Educational Services 37% 39% Health Care & Social Assistance 50% Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation Accommodation & Food Services 43% Other Services (except Pub Admin) Public Administration 27% 29% 0% 10% 30% 40% 50% 60% Note: Data for exhaustees with three quarters of post-unemployment wage record and making at least $600 or more per employer. A majority of exhaustees who found reemployment, regardless of orginating industry, are now employed in Retail Trade, Administration & Support, Health Care, or Accomodation & Food Services. For exhaustees from Manufacturing, Construction, and Finance & Insurance, about 30%, 15%, and 14% respectively are now in Administration & Support. In Retail Trade, about 42% stayed within the industry, with another 10% to of exhaustees from each of the other industries shown in Graph 6 moving into Retail Trade. 7

Graph 6: Pre-Unemployment to Post-Unemployment Industry for Select Industries Retail Trade Admin. & Support Health Care Acc. & Food Services Same Industry Other Industry 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 10% 0% Construction Manufacturing Retail Trade Finance & Insurance Admin. & Support Health Care Acc. & Food Services Pre-Unemployment Industry Note: Data for exhaustees with three quarters of post-unemployment wage record and making at least $600 or more per employer. Demographics of Connecticut s UI Claimants In the following section, we examine demographic data for exhaustees and current claimants including gender, race, age group, residency, and industry of prior employment based on information from Connecticut s UI system. The data behind the following graphs is presented in Appendix A. The specific cohorts of analysis are: All Exhaustees o Reemployed Exhaustees (in Quarter 2) Current Long-Term (EUC/EB) Claimants Current Regular Claimants Analyzing exhaustees and current claimants allows one to understand the entirety of the issue from the UI point of view: individuals who exited the system and individuals still within the system (potential exhaustees). 8

Age Distribution of UI Claimants UI claimants that found employment after exhausting benefits tend to be younger in comparison to all exhaustees, as shown in Graph 7. Exhaustees that are 49 years old or younger are 7% more likely to be working. Exhaustees between 50 to 64 years old make up the largest subset of all exhaustees at 34%, and they are 5% less likely to be working when compared to reemployed exhaustees. 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 15% 10% 5% 0% 27% Graph 7: Age Distribution of UI Claimants: Working Exhaustees vs. All Exhaustees 32% 39% 34% 29% All Exhaustees Reemployed Exhaustees 14% 21-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Age Bracket 4% A comparison of exhaustees, current long-term claimants, and current regular claimants finds current claimants tend to be younger, indicating younger claimants tend to find employment quicker and therefore are less likely to reach the point of exhausting benefits. As shown in Graph 8, the distribution of 16-34 year old current claimants is 8-11% greater than the distribution of exhaustees from the same age group. There is essentially no difference between 35-49 year olds, but exhaustees are overly represented by individuals 50 years and older by between 9-12%. The fact that exhaustees tend to be older is especially problematic given the finding in Graph 7 that it is more difficult for older exhaustees to find employment. Furthermore, in comparison to the other age brackets, UI claimants in general are overly represented by individuals 50 years and older. 9

60% 50% 40% 30% All Exhaustees Graph 8: Age Distribution for UI Claimants: Exhaustees and Current Long-Term/Regular Claimants Current Long-Term Claimants Current Regular Claimants 28% 31% 32% 32% 33% 48% 39% 36% 10% 0% 16-34 35-49 50+ Age Bracket Gender, Race, and Residency of UI Claimants A comparison to the 2010 labor force shows males initially suffered a greater impact from the recession, but now females are more adversely affected. Graph 9 shows current longterm claimants are 3% more likely to be male in comparison to the 2010 labor force. However, current regular claimants are 3% more likely to be female in comparison to the 2010 labor force. There is a full 6% difference in the gender distribution between current long-term and current regular claimants. 60% 50% 40% Graph 9: Gender of UI Claimants versus 2010 Labor Force 55% 52% 49% 48% 45% 51% 30% 10% 0% Males Females 2010 Labor Force Current Long-Term Claimants Current Regular Claimants 10

Compared to the composition of the 2010 labor force, current UI claimants are 30% less likely to be white, 4% more likely to be black, and 4% more likely to be Hispanic. Unfortunately, the race for about 15% of UI claimants is unknown. 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 10% 0% Graph 10: Race of Current UI Claimants versus 2010 Labor Force 85% 55% 10% 14% 14% 4% 10% 2% White Black Asian - Pacific Islander 2010 Labor Force Current Claimants Hispanic 15% Information Not Available The place of residency for UI claimants closely tracked the residency of the entire 2010 labor force. An exception was Waterbury, which is the home of 7% of current UI claimants but only about 5% of the 2010 labor force. Conversely, Bridgeport-Stamford residents represent about 25% of Connecticut s 2010 labor force, but only of its current claimants. Approximately 9% of Connecticut s UI claimants live outside Connecticut. 35% 30% 25% 31% 30% 25% Graph 11: Place of Residency for Current UI Claimants versus 2010 Labor Force 2010 Labor Force Current Claimants 15% 17% 17% 10% 5% 8% 7% 7% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 9% 0% Hartford Bridgepor t- Stamford New Haven Norwich- New London Waterbury Danbury Willimanti c- Danielson Torrington Enfield Out of State 11

Prior Industry of UI Claimants Graph 12 shows, based on CPS data, Connecticut s change in employment by industry during the recession. Manufacturing and Construction accounted for 33% of all the job losses, with Retail Trade and Administration & Support Services accounting for 24% of all job losses. There was a gain of 8,700 jobs in Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance during the recession. Graph 12: Change in CT Employment by Industry: March 2008 to January 2010 Manufacturing Construction Admin & Support & Waste Mgmt. Retail Trade Prof.; Sci.; and Tech. Srvcs. Government Wholesale Trade Finance and Insurance Acc. and Food Services Information Transportation and Utilities Other Services Real Estate Arts; Entertainment; and Recreation Mgmt. of Companies Nat. Resources & Mining Educational Services Health Care and Soc. Assistance -25-20 -15-10 -5 0 5 Thousands 12

Graph 13 shows the prior industry of employment for exhaustees and current long-term claimants. It is interesting to note that though Construction accounted for larger job losses during the recession, there are more claimants in Retail Trade and Admin & Support. Furthermore, even though the Education and Health Services industries grew during the recession, claimants from these industries still make up about 13% of exhaustees and longterm claimants. Manufacturing Construction Admin & Support & Waste Mgmt. Retail Trade Prof.; Sci.; and Tech. Srvcs. Public Administration Wholesale Trade Finance and Insurance Acc. and Food Services Information Transportation and Utilities Other Services Real Estate Arts; Entertainment; and Recreation Mgmt. of Companies Nat. Resources & Mining Educational Services Health Care and Soc. Assistance Graph 13: Prior Industry for Exhaustees and Current Long-Term Claimants 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Number of Claimants Thousands Concluding Remarks Over 55,000 claimants have exhausted UI benefits in Connecticut. By June 2012 it is expected there will be approximately 78,000 exhaustees without jobs, assuming the current path of slow job growth and reemployment rate. Based on UI wage records only about 25% to 35% of exhaustees find employment, and even for those that are reemployed, most are making less than they previously earned. Further, older workers, who face additional challenges in finding work, make up a large percent of the exhaustees. With UI claimants spread out across all industries, the task of supporting and propelling Connecticut s unemployed out of the hole caused by the recession will remain an important task for years to come. 13

Appendix A: Demographic Data for Connecticut's Unemployment Insurance Claimants Data as of August 27, Current Regular Claimants Current Long- Term (EUC/EB) Claimants Exhaustees Exhaustees Working Q2 Current Regular Claimants Current Long- Term (EUC/EB) Claimants Exhaustees Exhaustees Working Q2 Total 61,090 64,030 55,501 10,656 61,090 64,030 55,501 10,656 Gender Male 29,672 35,102 31,034 6,069 48.6% 54.8% 55.9% 57.0% Female 31,418 28,928 24,467 4,587 51.4% 45.2% 44.1% 43.0% Race White 32,620 36,443 33,318 6,041 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 56.7% Black 8,666 8,735 7,668 1,684 14.2% 13.6% 13.8% 15.8% Asian, Pacific Islander 986 1,207 1,451 227 1.6% 1.9% 2.6% 2.1% Native American, Alaskan Native 164 213 210 40 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% Hispanic 8,544 9,379 7,364 1,562 14.0% 14.6% 13.3% 14.7% Information Not Available 10,110 8,053 5,490 1,102 16.5% 12.6% 9.9% 10.3% Age Group 16-20 932 350 59 10 1.5% 0.5% 0.1% 0.1% 21-34 17,914 17,843 10,977 2,923 29.3% 27.9% 19.8% 27.4% 35-49 20,202 20,650 17,778 4,143 33.1% 32.3% 32.0% 38.9% 50-64 17,931 19,628 18,903 3,103 29.4% 30.7% 34.1% 29.1% 65+ 3,985 5,482 7,692 455 6.5% 8.6% 13.9% 4.3% Unknown 126 77 92 22 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% Residency (WIA) North Central WIA 17,087 17,657 14,783 3,296 28.0% 27.6% 26.6% 30.9% South Central WIA 12,627 12,990 10,850 2,291 20.7% 20.3% 19.5% 21.5% Southwest WIA 10,970 11,138 10,320 1,961 18.0% 17.4% 18.6% 18.4% Northwest WIA 8,833 8,879 7,968 1,689 14.5% 13.9% 14.4% 15.9% Eastern WIA 6,717 6,755 5,327 1,158 11.0% 10.5% 9.6% 10.9% Out of State 4,856 6,611 6,253 261 7.9% 10.3% 11.3% 2.4%

Current Regular Claimants Current Long- Term (EUC/EB) Claimants Exhaustees Exhaustees Working Q2 Current Regular Claimants Current Long- Term (EUC/EB) Claimants Exhaustees Exhaustees Working Q2 Total 61,090 64,030 55,501 10,656 61,090 64,030 55,501 10,656 Residency (LMA) Bridgeport-Stamford 12,488 12,643 11,791 2,240 20.4% 19.7% 21.2% 21.0% Danbury 1,934 1,732 1,750 372 3.2% 2.7% 3.2% 3.5% Enfield 1,357 1,329 1,141 237 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% Hartford 18,725 19,082 15,892 3,565 30.7% 29.8% 28.6% 33.5% New Haven 10,278 10,714 8,870 1,834 16.8% 16.7% 16.0% 17.2% Norwich-New London 4,095 4,157 3,229 715 6.7% 6.5% 5.8% 6.7% Torrington 1,449 1,472 1,236 229 2.4% 2.3% 2.2% 2.1% Waterbury 4,189 4,494 3,864 890 6.9% 7.0% 7.0% 8.4% Willimantic-Danielson 1,719 1,796 1,475 313 2.8% 2.8% 2.7% 2.9% Out of State 4,856 6,611 6,253 261 7.9% 10.3% 11.3% 2.4% Prior Industry (Based on Employer Charge Percent) Natural Resources & Mining 342 426 206 22 0.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.2% Construction 4,449 6,095 5,131 1,045 7.3% 9.5% 9.2% 9.8% Manufacturing 5,103 8,060 9,172 1,864 8.4% 12.6% 16.5% 17.5% Wholesale Trade 2,166 3,287 3,612 749 3.5% 5.1% 6.5% 7.0% Retail Trade 6,974 8,309 6,934 1,403 11.4% 13.0% 12.5% 13.2% Transportation & Utilities 6,705 2,082 1,706 359 11.0% 3.3% 3.1% 3.4% Information 1,168 1,762 1,783 275 1.9% 2.8% 3.2% 2.6% Finance & Insurance 2,960 3,977 3,468 654 4.8% 6.2% 6.2% 6.1% Real Estate and Rental & Leasing 841 1,117 1,175 183 1.4% 1.7% 2.1% 1.7% Prof., Sci., & Tech. Services 2,966 3,031 2,989 493 4.9% 4.7% 5.4% 4.6% Mgmt of Companies & Enterprises 273 456 587 102 0.4% 0.7% 1.1% 1.0% Admin & Support & Waste Mgmt. & Remed 6,023 6,294 5,642 1,150 9.9% 9.8% 10.2% 10.8% Educational Services 2,696 2,027 1,391 211 4.4% 3.2% 2.5% 2.0% Health Care & Social Assistance 7,017 6,886 4,665 884 11.5% 10.8% 8.4% 8.3% Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation 1,351 1,901 1,294 213 2.2% 3.0% 2.3% 2.0% Accommodation & Food Services 5,338 3,775 2,712 558 8.7% 5.9% 4.9% 5.2% Other Services (except Pub Admin) 2,031 2,155 1,827 311 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 2.9% Public Administration 969 1,003 497 73 1.6% 1.6% 0.9% 0.7% Unclassified establishment 1,717 1,386 711 109 2.8% 2.2% 1.3% 1.0%